🔥How to Use Turnitin AI Detection Checker For FREE
TLDRThe video discusses AI detection and its relevance to different groups, emphasizing that only those in niche markets, academia, or writing for clients requiring AI testing need to be concerned. It presents a method to check AI-generated content without using Turnitin and compares various AI detection tools, focusing on their accuracy and reliability. The experiment involves testing these tools on original and altered essays to determine which can best proxy Turnitin results, concluding that Copyleaks is a reliable alternative for basic AI detection, while Content at Scale or CrossCheck can be used for transformed outputs.
Takeaways
- 🔍 The video discusses AI detection and its relevance to different groups, emphasizing that those not in niche markets, academia, or writing for clients requiring AI detection shouldn't worry about it.
- ⏱️ The speaker has previously covered their stance on AI detection in every video, and this video further explores the topic with a detailed experiment.
- 📝 The experiment involved generating a list of popular essay topics, creating essays for each, and then testing various AI detectors on the original and altered outputs.
- 🖥️ The AI detectors used in the experiment were Copyleaks, Content at Scale, CrossBlack, and Originality.ai, chosen for their accessibility and free or limited versions.
- 📊 The results showed that Originality.ai was not reliable when compared to Turnitin, with a correlation of almost 40%, which is significantly lower than the desired 0.6 or 0.7 for reliability.
- 🔗 Copyleaks Basic Model showed a 75% correlation with Turnitin, suggesting that it can be used as a proxy for AI detection if Turnitin is not accessible.
- 🔄 The speaker tested altered outputs through undetectable.ai and found that Originality.ai consistently returned 0% AI, which doesn't allow for correlation analysis.
- 📈 The average score for transformed outputs was 0% AI according to Copyleaks and 98% human according to Content at Scale, indicating that transformation techniques can effectively bypass AI detection.
- 🛠️ Users with their own methods of bypassing AI detection can use Copyleaks to check the basic state of AI-generated text, assuming good scores indicate a similar outcome with Turnitin.
- 🆓 Content at Scale and CrossBlack offer free or limited trials that can be easily bypassed by changing browsers or VPNs, providing accessible options for AI detection.
- 🎥 The video aims to provide helpful insights into AI detection tools and their effectiveness, encouraging users to make informed decisions based on the findings.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is AI detection, specifically focusing on how to check outputs for AI generation without using Turnitin and comparing different AI detection tools for accuracy.
What is the speaker's position on AI detection?
-The speaker's position is that one should not worry about AI detection unless they are in a niche market, academia, or writing for clients who test outputs with AI detection tools.
What was the first step in the speaker's experiment on AI detection?
-The first step was to generate a list of 10 popular essay topics using jgpd and then create a 1000-word essay for each topic, resulting in actual word counts between 500 and 600 words.
Which AI detectors were chosen for the experiment?
-Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, and CrossBlack were chosen for the experiment due to their free versions and ease of use without limitations. Originality.ai was also checked but not primarily relied upon.
What was the purpose of testing the AI detectors with low, average, and high-quality outputs?
-The purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of the AI detectors by comparing their readings with the original, human-written, and high-quality AI-generated outputs to determine which tool could best distinguish between AI and human writing.
What did the speaker find about the correlation between Originality and Turnitin?
-The speaker found that there was almost a 40% correlation between Originality and Turnitin, which is less than what is typically needed (0.6 or 0.7) for reliability.
How did CopyLeaks Basic Model perform in comparison with Turnitin?
-CopyLeaks Basic Model showed a 75% correlation with Turnitin, indicating that if a document was flagged by Turnitin, it was likely that CopyLeaks would also flag it as AI-generated.
What was the outcome when using AntiDex.ai to alter AI-generated essays?
-Using AntiDex.ai to alter AI-generated essays resulted in outputs that were consistently detected as 0% AI and 100% human by Turnitin, indicating a high success rate in bypassing AI detection.
What can be concluded from the experiment regarding AI detection tools?
-The conclusion is that for basic AI-generated text checking, CopyLeaks can be used. For more transformed outputs, Content at Scale or CrossBlack can be used as proxies for Turnitin to get an idea of how the text might rank with Turnitin.
How can one bypass the limitations of CopyLeaks and CrossBlack?
-The limitations of CopyLeaks and CrossBlack can be bypassed by using a different browser, turning a VPN on and off, or changing the IP address to get additional free tests.
What is the speaker's final recommendation for those concerned about AI detection?
-The speaker recommends that if individuals have their own methods of transforming outputs and want to check the basic state of AI-generated text, they can use CopyLeaks. For transformed outputs, they can use Content at Scale or CrossBlack to gauge how it might perform with Turnitin.
Outlines
🤖 Introduction to AI Detection Concerns and Video Objectives
The speaker begins by addressing the common concerns about AI detection in content creation, emphasizing that worry is unnecessary unless one is in a niche market, academia, or writing for clients who specifically test for AI-generated content. The video's main objective is to introduce a method to check outputs for AI-generated content without using Turnitin, and to compare different AI detection tools for accuracy.
📊 AI Detection Tools Comparison and Experiment Setup
The speaker details the process of selecting AI detection tools for the experiment, mentioning the use of free versions of Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, and CrossCheck, as well as the originality.ai for reference. The experiment involves generating essays on popular topics, using various AI detectors on original and altered outputs to determine their effectiveness. The goal is to find a reliable proxy tool that can accurately predict Turnitin results.
📈 Results Analysis and Recommendations for AI Detection Tools
The speaker presents the results of the AI detection experiment, noting that Originality and CrossCheck did not show reliable correlation with Turnitin scores, while CopyLeaks Basic Model did, indicating it can be used as a proxy for Turnitin. For transformed outputs, Originality consistently returned 0% AI, making it difficult to perform correlation analysis. However, the average human score was high. The speaker suggests using CopyLeaks or CrossCheck for checking transformed outputs, as they can be bypassed for free use, offering a cost-effective solution for AI detection.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI detection
💡Torrented
💡Niche
💡Content at scale
💡Copyleaks
💡Cross black
💡Originality.ai
💡Correlation
💡AI-generated content
💡Transformation
💡Proxy
Highlights
The video discusses AI detection and its concerns, emphasizing that only those in niche markets, academia, or writing for clients should worry about it.
The speaker has consistently stated their position on AI detection across their videos, reassuring viewers that general concerns are often misplaced.
AI-generated content ranks on Google's first page, validating the speaker's claim that AI detection is not a widespread issue for most content creators.
The video introduces a trick to check outputs for AI detection without using Turnitin, a popular academic tool.
A comparison of different AI detection tools is presented, offering insights into their accuracy and reliability.
The process of generating a list of popular essay topics and essays using AI is detailed, providing a foundation for the experiment.
The speaker reviews the best AI content detectors on their blog, offering a resource for viewers interested in learning more about the topic.
Content at Scale, CopyLeaks, and CrossBlack are chosen as AI detection tools for the experiment due to their free versions and accessibility.
Originality.ai is also tested, but it's noted that its scores do not correlate highly with Turnitin, questioning its reliability.
CopyLeaks Basic Model shows a 75% correlation with Turnitin, suggesting it could be a reliable proxy for AI detection.
The experiment's logic is explained, focusing on finding a correlation between AI detection tools to determine their reliability.
Transformed outputs using Undetectable.ai show zero percent AI in Turnitin, indicating a high effectiveness in bypassing AI detection.
Average scores for transformed outputs are near 100 for human-like content, suggesting that transformation techniques are effective.
Content at Scale and CrossBlack can be used to check if outputs pass AI detection, offering alternatives to Turnitin.
The video concludes that if you have methods to bypass AI detection, using CopyLeaks can be a safe bet for general content checks.
For transformed content, Content at Scale or CrossBlack can be used to gauge how it might rank with Turnitin, providing a workaround for those without access.
The video is a helpful resource for understanding AI detection, its tools, and methods for bypassing it, offering practical advice for content creators.