Ai URUTTU - பொய் சொல்லி மாட்டிக்கொண்ட GOOGLE😅 | Gemini Ai FAKE 🤯 #gemini #chatgpt
TLDRThe video script discusses the release of Google's AI, Gemini, which is portrayed as a competitor to ChatGPT. It highlights the AI's supposed ability to interact live with users through video, but then reveals that the demonstrations are staged using photos rather than live video. The script also accuses Google of misleading marketing by claiming Gemini scored higher than human benchmarks on certain tests, which is disputed by the speaker. The video suggests that such AI stunts are marketing strategies for fundraising and IPOs, drawing parallels to the dot com bubble of 2000.
Takeaways
- 🚀 Google recently released an AI model named Gemini, aiming to compete with ChatGPT.
- 🎥 The promotional video for Gemini AI showcased its ability to interact live with users and recognize objects in real-time, but the video was later revealed to be misleading.
- 🔍 The video demonstrated Gemini AI's capability to describe drawings and make inferences, but it was later clarified that the interactions were not live.
- 🎭 The script suggests that the video was heavily edited and not a true representation of the AI's capabilities.
- 🤔 The presenter questions the authenticity of Google's claims about Gemini's performance on benchmarks compared to human and other AI models.
- 📉 The script implies that Google's marketing tactics may have led to a temporary dip in their stock value due to public skepticism.
- 📈 The discussion highlights a historical precedent, the dot com bubble of 2000, to explain the potential motivations behind Google's actions.
- 💡 AIs, according to the script, are being used as a fundraising stunt by companies to attract investments, similar to the dot com era.
- 🎓 The script raises questions about the educational aspect of AI, questioning how one can learn AI without a solid foundation in computer science.
- 🌐 The video transcript became a topic of discussion and debate, with the presenter encouraging viewers to share their thoughts in the comments.
- 📊 The presenter invites viewers to speculate on the longevity of the AI bubble and its potential impact on the industry.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video transcript?
-The main topic of the video transcript is the critique of Google's AI, Gemini, and the discussion around its capabilities, marketing strategies, and comparisons to other AI models like ChatGPT.
What does Gemini AI claim to see when shown a piece of paper?
-Gemini AI claims to see a white paper and later identifies it as an unfinished boat drawing, which is incorrect as it is actually a crocodile on the road.
How does the video transcript describe Google's approach to developing and marketing AI technology?
-The video transcript describes Google's approach as a marketing stunt aimed at boosting stock prices and competing with other AI technologies like ChatGPT, rather than focusing on genuine innovation and accurate representation of its AI's capabilities.
What is the significance of the 'Chain of Thoughts' (CoT) in the context of AI model benchmarking?
-The 'Chain of Thoughts' (CoT) is a benchmarking strategy where AI models are given multiple choice questions based on a set of themes. The AI's ability to answer these questions correctly is used to measure its performance and compare it with human responses.
What is the claim made by the video about Google's benchmarking results for Gemini and GPT-4?
-The video claims that Google has falsely reported the benchmarking results, stating that Gemini scored higher than GPT-4 in certain aspects, despite the actual performance being lower.
How does the video transcript view the trend of AI courses in colleges?
-The video transcript questions the validity of AI courses in colleges, suggesting that a solid foundation in computer science, including programming, data structures, mathematics, and other related subjects, is necessary to understand and work with AI technology effectively.
What historical event is the video comparing the current AI trend to?
-The video compares the current AI trend to the dot com bubble of the early 2000s, suggesting that the hype and investment in AI may not always lead to sustainable growth and innovation.
What is the role of an editor in the development of AI models as suggested in the video?
-The video humorously suggests that instead of hiring many engineers, Google thought it would be easier to just hire a good editor to create promotional materials, implying that the company is more focused on marketing than actual AI development.
What is the video's stance on the future of AI technology?
-The video predicts that the current hype around AI might be temporary and that, similar to the dot com bubble, only a few companies will survive and provide meaningful innovation in the field.
How does the video transcript address the issue of misinformation in AI demonstrations?
-The video transcript points out that the AI demonstrations presented by companies like Google can be misleading and inaccurate, as seen in the example of the 'unfinshed boat drawing' which was actually a crocodile.
What is the video's suggestion for companies and individuals interested in AI?
-The video suggests that companies and individuals should be cautious of the hype and focus on genuine innovation and accurate representation of AI capabilities, rather than relying on marketing stunts and misleading information.
Outlines
🤖 Google's Gemini AI Demonstration: Fact or Fiction?
The first paragraph discusses the recent release of Google's AI, Gemini, which is claimed to compete with ChatGPT and have live video interaction capabilities. The speaker describes setting up a demonstration with a Sony camera and microphone to interact with Gemini. Throughout the interaction, Gemini provides various responses to what it 'sees' on the paper, including an unfinished boat drawing and a crocodile on the road. The speaker then reveals that the video showcasing Gemini's capabilities is not genuine, and that the AI is not able to interact with live video as advertised. The paragraph concludes with the speaker expressing skepticism about the authenticity of Google's claims and hinting at the possibility of deceit for marketing purposes.
🎥 Unraveling the Truth Behind Google's AI Video
In the second paragraph, the speaker delves deeper into the discrepancies found in Google's promotional video for Gemini AI. The speaker points out that the excitement generated by the video was based on misleading information, as the video was crafted with editing techniques rather than showcasing real-time AI capabilities. The speaker also discusses the stock market's reaction to the video, noting a negative impact on Google's stock price. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes Google's benchmarking methods for the AI, suggesting that the company has manipulated the results to make Gemini appear superior to other models. The paragraph ends with the speaker questioning Google's motives, likening the situation to the dot-com bubble and suggesting that the AI industry may be experiencing a similar bubble.
📚 AI in Education and the Future of the Industry
The final paragraph shifts focus to the prevalence of AI courses in educational institutions and the speaker's skepticism about the practicality of learning AI without a solid foundation in computer science. The speaker questions the value of these courses and compares the current AI trend to the dot-com bubble, suggesting that the industry is experiencing a boom that may not be sustainable. The speaker predicts that, much like the aftermath of the dot-com bubble, a few companies will emerge from the current AI bubble to bring real innovation to the public. The paragraph concludes with the speaker inviting viewers to share their thoughts on the matter and speculate on the longevity of the AI bubble.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Gemini AI
💡ChatGPT
💡Multimodal prompting
💡Fake capabilities
💡Bench marks
💡Chain of Thoughts (CoT)
💡MMLU
💡Marketing stunt
💡Dot com bubble
💡Investment and IPOs
💡AI education
Highlights
Google's release of a new AI called Gemini, aimed at competing with ChatGPT.
Gemini AI's ability to interact live with users, including through video.
The demonstration of Gemini AI's capabilities through a live video feed connected to a laptop.
Gemini AI's initial misinterpretation of a piece of paper as an unfinished boat drawing.
The correction of Gemini AI's interpretation from an undrawn boat to a crocodile.
Gemini AI's humorous and incorrect assertion that a crocodile is on Perungulathur road.
The revelation that the video showcasing Gemini AI's capabilities is fake and only a series of photos.
The discussion on the multi-modal capabilities of GPT-4, which can process both text and images.
Google's intentional misleading of the public with the release of the Gemini AI video.
The impact of Google's misleading information on their stock price and public perception.
The explanation of the MMLU benchmark and how Google allegedly manipulated the results.
The comparison of Gemini AI's performance with GPT-4 in the 5-shot and Chain of Thoughts categories.
The accusation that Google's marketing tactics are dishonest and misleading.
The historical comparison of the AI bubble to the dot com bubble of 2000.
The prediction that the current AI trend may lead to a bubble similar to the dot com era.
The suggestion that AI education in colleges is a trend-following move without solid foundations.
The closing thoughts on the video, inviting viewers to share their opinions on AI.