How To Check For Plagiarism in Grammarly & Is It Any Good?

Faculty of Apps
18 Oct 202004:37

TLDRThe video script presents a comparative analysis of Grammarly's premium plagiarism tool and a free online alternative, QTex.com. The author tests both tools using four documents, including original content and texts from various sources. While Grammarly's tool occasionally overshoots in detecting plagiarism, QTex.com provides more accurate results in some instances. The video concludes that there isn't a significant difference between Grammarly's premium feature and free online tools, offering viewers valuable insights into effective plagiarism detection methods.

Takeaways

  • 📝 The video compares Grammarly's plagiarism tool with a free online plagiarism checker, QTex.
  • 💰 Grammarly's plagiarism checker is a premium feature, while QTex is free to use.
  • 📚 The test includes four documents: an original piece of writing, a famous quote from Charles Dickens, a movie review from The New York Times, and a paragraph from a high school biology textbook.
  • 🤔 Grammarly incorrectly identified the original writing as similar to content on JustAnswer.com.
  • 📖 QTex did not find any matches for the original writing, indicating a more accurate result.
  • 🎬 For the famous opening lines from 'A Tale of Two Cities', Grammarly failed to find a match, while QTex identified a different source.
  • 🎥 Grammarly successfully identified the New York Times movie review as non-original content.
  • 🏫 QTex also recognized the movie review text, but from an archived version on archive.org.
  • 📖 For the biology textbook paragraph, Grammarly identified a similar text from a different website than where the text was taken.
  • 🔍 Both tools identified the biology textbook paragraph from different educational websites, with QTex finding a site offering the book under a Creative Commons license.
  • 📈 The video concludes that there isn't much difference between Grammarly's premium feature and free online checking tools.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the video?

    -The main topic of the video is a comparison between Grammarly's plagiarism tool and a free online plagiarism tool, QTex.

  • How many documents does the author create for the test?

    -The author creates four documents for the test.

  • What is the source of the first document the author wrote?

    -The first document is the author's own writing, which is a poor-quality piece of text.

  • Which famous introductory paragraph is used in the video for testing?

    -The famous introductory paragraph from Charles Dickens' novel 'A Tale of Two Cities' is used.

  • How does Grammarly's plagiarism checker perform on the author's own writing?

    -Grammarly's plagiarism checker mistakenly identifies the first seven words as similar to a text found on JustAnswer.com, showing it is overzealous in this instance.

  • What is the result of using QTex on the author's own writing?

    -QTex returns a nil result, indicating that the text is 100% original, which is correct.

  • How does Grammarly handle the famous opening lines from 'A Tale of Two Cities'?

    -Grammarly fails to find any matching text on the internet and incorrectly believes the writing to be 100% original.

  • What does QTex identify for the opening lines of 'A Tale of Two Cities'?

    -QTex identifies some of the text from a different website, but it includes a mention of Charles Dickens in the results, making it a better outcome than Grammarly's.

  • How accurate is Grammarly in identifying the source of a New York Times movie review?

    -Grammarly accurately identifies the text as coming from a New York Times newspaper article.

  • What is the result when comparing the biology textbook paragraph using both tools?

    -Both Grammarly and QTex identify the text from different websites, but not the exact source used by the author, showing that while they are somewhat effective, they are not perfect.

  • What is the conclusion the author reaches regarding Grammarly's premium feature versus free checking tools?

    -The author concludes that there isn't much difference between Grammarly's premium plagiarism checker and the free checking tools available on the internet.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Comparing Grammarly's Plagiarism Checker to a Free Online Tool

The video begins with the creator introducing a comparison between Grammarly's premium plagiarism tool and a free online plagiarism checker. The creator sets up the test by preparing four documents, one original and three taken from various sources on the internet, including a famous quote from Charles Dickens, a movie review from The New York Times, and a paragraph from a high school biology textbook. The objective is to evaluate how effectively Grammarly's tool identifies plagiarism in comparison to the free online tool, QTex.com.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Plagiarism Tool

A plagiarism tool is a software or service designed to detect instances of plagiarism in written works by comparing the text against a database of existing content. In the video, the focus is on comparing Grammarly's plagiarism checker with a free online tool, QTex, to evaluate their effectiveness in identifying copied content.

💡Grammarly

Grammarly is an online writing assistant that helps users with grammar, punctuation, style, and other aspects of writing. In the context of the video, Grammarly is specifically being evaluated for its premium plagiarism checking feature.

💡QTex.com

QTex.com is a free online plagiarism detection service that compares submitted text against a vast database of internet sources to identify instances of copied content. In the video, QTex.com is used as a point of comparison to Grammarly's premium plagiarism tool.

💡Charles Dickens

Charles Dickens was an English writer and social critic, known for his novels, including 'A Tale of Two Cities.' In the video, a famous introductory paragraph from his novel is used as an example of text to test the plagiarism tools.

💡New York Times

The New York Times is a well-known American newspaper with a broad online presence. In the video, a movie review from the New York Times is used as a sample text to demonstrate how plagiarism tools identify content from reputable sources.

💡High School Biology Textbook

A high school biology textbook is an educational resource used to teach biology at the secondary education level. In the video, a paragraph from a textbook called 'Concepts of Biology' is used to test the plagiarism tools' ability to recognize copied content from educational materials.

💡Original Work

Original work refers to a piece of writing or content that is created by the author and not copied from other sources. In the video, the author's own writing is used to test the plagiarism tools and see if they correctly identify it as non-plagiarized.

💡Internet Sources

Internet sources refer to the various online platforms and websites where written content can be found. In the context of the video, internet sources are the databases against which the plagiarism tools compare the submitted texts to detect any matches.

💡Comparison

Comparison in this context refers to the process of evaluating two or more items to determine their similarities and differences. The video is centered around comparing the effectiveness of Grammarly's premium plagiarism checker with the free online tool QTex.com.

💡Online Tools

Online tools are web-based applications or services that provide specific functionalities to users over the internet. In the video, both Grammarly and QTex.com are examples of online tools that offer plagiarism detection services.

💡Creative Commons License

A Creative Commons License is a type of public copyright license that enables the free distribution of an original work under certain conditions. In the video, one of the results from the plagiarism check shows a site offering a textbook under this type of license.

Highlights

The video demonstrates the use of Grammarly's plagiarism tool in comparison to a free online plagiarism tool.

Grammarly's plagiarism checker is available only to premium subscribers.

The author has created four documents for the test, including one original piece of writing and three taken from the internet.

The first document is an original, poorly written piece that should not trigger any plagiarism alerts.

The second document is an excerpt from Charles Dickens' 'A Tale of Two Cities' from the Gutenberg Press website.

The third document is a movie review from The New York Times for 'Hubbie Halloween'.

The fourth document is a paragraph from a high school biology textbook 'Concepts of Biology' found on Amazon.

The free online testing site used for comparison is called QTex.com.

Grammarly incorrectly identifies the author's original work as similar to content on JustAnswer.com.

QTex does not find any plagiarism in the author's original work, providing a more accurate result.

Grammarly fails to find matching text for the famous opening lines of 'A Tale of Two Cities', incorrectly marking it as 100% original.

QTex identifies some of the text from 'A Tale of Two Cities' from a different website, providing a better result than Grammarly.

Both Grammarly and QTex successfully identify the New York Times movie review as plagiarized content.

Grammarly and QTex identify different sources for the plagiarized paragraph from the biology textbook, with Grammarly finding a non-Amazon website.

The educational site identified by QTex for the biology textbook paragraph is offering the book under a Creative Commons license.

The video concludes that there is not much difference between Grammarly's premium feature and free checking tools available online.

The author encourages viewers to subscribe to the channel and visit the blog Faculty of Apps for more tips and videos.

Casual Browsing

New! ALCHEMY REFINER for Leonardo AI - How to use it & is it any good?

2024-04-07 06:15:02

how to check plagiarism in Duplichecker

2024-04-15 20:50:01

RVC's Realtime AI Voice Changer - Is It Any Good?

2024-05-17 03:35:02

How to Remove Plagiarism II How to Check Plagiarism using Turnitin II Plagiarism Checker

2024-04-09 22:35:01

LLaVA 1.6 is here...but is it any good? (via Ollama)

2024-03-29 01:00:01

How to check, remove or reduce plagiarism fast

2024-04-09 23:05:02