Shocking Truth: Google Bard vs ChatGPT vs Chatsonic vs Perplexity AI!
TLDRIn the AI chat bot showdown, Google Bard, ChatSonix, Perplexity AI, and ChatGPT were compared across three prompts. Google Bard was fast but lacked depth, ChatSonix provided detailed results with sources, Perplexity excelled in web research with accurate text and images, and ChatGPT demonstrated creativity and专业性 in crafting responses. ChatSonix emerged as the overall winner for its high-quality, usable outputs, while ChatGPT excelled in creativity and convincingness.
Takeaways
- 🤖 Google Bard is quick but lacks depth in responses, offering limited user interaction and immediate answers without showing progress.
- 🚀 ChatSonicic is slower in providing results but compensates with detailed information from multiple sources, enhancing the quality of the output.
- 🌟 Perplexity AI stands out for its fast response time, visual progress indication, and inclusion of both text and images, leading to a comprehensive user experience.
- 📝 ChatGPT requires an additional prompt to search the internet but excels when enabled, providing detailed, well-structured, and creative content.
- ⚽️ In the soccer-related prompt, Perplexity AI delivered the best results with accurate text and numerous images, outperforming the other AI chatbots.
- 📧 For the HR warning email task, ChatGPT produced the most professional and usable content, demonstrating a clear understanding of the task and adding creative elements not specified in the prompt.
- 💡 In the sales email prompt, ChatGPT again outperformed with a creative and convincing email, including unique selling points and a pricing discount, showcasing its ability to generate strong sales copy.
- 🥇 Overall, ChatGPT and ChatSonicic are the top choices for tasks requiring high-quality writing and creativity, with Perplexity AI being the best for web-based research with sources and images.
- 📉 Google Bard currently falls short in competition, showing the need for more human input and development to improve its usability and output quality.
- 🔍 Users should select an AI chatbot based on their specific needs, considering factors such as speed, depth, creativity, and the ability to incorporate internet research effectively.
Q & A
Which AI chat bot is new to the market competing with existing ones?
-Google Bard is the new AI chat bot entering the market to compete with existing ones.
What are the three main categories of prompts used to test the AI chat bots?
-The three main categories of prompts used to test the AI chat bots are soccer-related, professional work life, and sales role in a professional context.
How does Google Bard perform in terms of speed and user experience?
-Google Bard is quick in providing answers, and the user does not see the writing progress. Once finished, the answer pops up immediately, offering a smooth user experience.
What is the main drawback of ChatSonic when it comes to searching?
-The main drawback of ChatSonic is that it takes a lot of time to search, which can be frustrating for users who need quick results.
How does Perplexity AI differ from the other AI chat bots in terms of user feedback?
-Perplexity AI provides good user feedback by showing the writing progress and rewards users with pictures as well as sources, enhancing the overall user experience.
What is the main advantage of ChatGPT when its internet browsing feature is enabled?
-When ChatGPT's internet browsing feature is enabled, it provides good results with progress visualization, sources, and even pictures, despite the slower search time compared to Perplexity AI.
Which AI chat bot performed the best in the HR-related prompt?
-ChatGPT performed the best in the HR-related prompt, creating a formally perfect email with a good structure and a high level of creativity.
How did ChatSonic handle the sales-related prompt about a new gin?
-ChatSonic took some time to think of an answer but eventually provided a good and convincing sales email with unique selling points and style elements that highlight the product's features.
What was the main issue with Google Bard's performance in the sales-related prompt?
-Google Bard was overwhelmed with the sales-related prompt, resulting in a low level of creativity and an unusable sales email that was not strong or convincing.
Which AI chat bot is recommended for high-quality writing tasks requiring creativity?
-ChatGPT and ChatSonic are recommended for high-quality writing tasks requiring creativity, as they provide usable and well-structured outcomes.
Which AI chat bot excels in web-based research with sources and pictures?
-Perplexity AI excels in web-based research with sources and pictures, providing the best results in terms of accuracy and visual content.
Outlines
🤖 AI Chat Bots Comparison: Features and Evaluation
This paragraph introduces the comparison of Google Bard, Chat Sonic, and Perplexity, along with Chat GPT, in the realm of AI chat bots. It outlines the strengths and weaknesses of each bot and emphasizes the importance of personal evaluation to determine which AI best suits individual needs. The paragraph presents three prompts to test the capabilities of these AIs: one related to soccer and two related to professional work life. The evaluation criteria include speed, user feedback, search quality, creativity, and applicability in real-world contexts. Google Bard is noted for its speed but lacks in-depth content. Chat Sonic offers detailed results with sources, albeit slower. Perplexity is recognized for its fast response and high-quality output with pictures and sources. Chat GPT requires an extra prompt to search the internet but provides comprehensive and creative responses when enabled. The paragraph concludes that Perplexity delivers the best results for the soccer-related prompt, while Chat GPT and Chat Sonic are the top choices for creative writing tasks.
📝 HR and Sales Challenges: AI Chat Bots' Performance
The second paragraph delves into the performance of the AI chat bots in specific professional scenarios: human resources and sales. It begins with an HR-related task, where Bard's response is quick but lacks creativity and quality, necessitating human input for practical use. Chat Sonic's response is comprehensive and usable with minor adjustments, while Perplexity's output is short and precise but not as convincing. Chat GPT excels in creating a professional and creative email, showcasing a high level of creativity and structure. The paragraph then shifts to a sales role, where Bard struggles to create a compelling email, Chat Sonic eventually provides a convincing email with unique selling points, and Perplexity offers a brief but visually appealing response. Chat GPT, however, stands out by crafting a strong and convincing sales email with unique selling features and a well-structured format. The paragraph concludes that Google Bard is currently outperformed by Perplexity, Chat Sonic, and Chat GPT, with the latter two being the best choices for tasks requiring creativity and high-quality writing.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI chat bots
💡Benchmark
💡Soccer
💡Professional work life
💡Google Bard
💡ChatSonics
💡Perplexity AI
💡ChatGPT
💡User feedback
💡Sales email
💡Web-based research
Highlights
Google Bard, ChatSonix, Perplexity AI, and ChatGPT are compared in an AI chat bots battle.
Each AI chat bot has its own strengths and weaknesses, and users should evaluate which one fits their needs best.
Three prompts are used to test the AI chat bots, including one about soccer and two related to professional work life.
Google Bard provides quick but brief responses without showing writing progress.
ChatSonix takes longer to search but offers multiple sources, enhancing search quality.
Perplexity AI offers fast responses with good user feedback and includes pictures and sources.
ChatGPT requires an extra prompt to search the internet but provides good results with visualized progress.
In the soccer-related prompt, Perplexity AI wins with the best results, including accurate text and many pictures.
For the HR-related prompt, ChatGPT creates a professional and usable warning email with added creativity.
ChatSonix provides a comprehensive and real-world applicable response with minor adjustments needed.
Bard's response for the HR prompt is low in creativity and quality, requiring more human input.
In the sales-related prompt, ChatGPT's sales email is strong, convincing, and creatively highlights unique selling points.
ChatSonix's sales email is convincing but took longer to generate and lacked some output initially.
Perplexity's sales email is short but includes visualized selling points and a woman-owned business angle.
Google Bard's sales email is far from strong and convincing, and is not usable.
Overall, ChatGPT and ChatSonix are the best choices for high-quality writing requiring creativity.
Perplexity is the winner for web-based research with sources and pictures.
Google Bard cannot compete with Perplexity, ChatSonix, and ChatGPT at the moment.