‘Cows coming home!’: Mary Trump says ‘unprepared’ Donald is ‘short circuiting’ in court

MSNBC
16 Apr 202409:30

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses the impact of a judge's strict instructions on Donald Trump, who is accustomed to controlling narratives. The judge warns Trump of the consequences of disrupting court proceedings, including exclusion and potential jail time. The conversation explores Trump's psychological response to the loss of control in a criminal trial setting, which is a novel experience for him. The participants debate the absence of cameras in the courtroom, with some arguing it prevents Trump from spinning the narrative to his advantage, while others suggest it's a disservice to the public, who have a right to witness the judicial process. The summary highlights the unique challenges Trump faces in a formal trial environment and the broader implications for transparency in the American legal system.

Takeaways

  • 📜 The transcript discusses Mary Trump's relationship with her uncle, Donald Trump, and the implications of a judge's instructions to him regarding courtroom behavior.
  • 👨‍⚖️ Donald Trump is informed by a judge that he must be present at his trial, cannot disrupt proceedings, and faces potential jail time for misconduct.
  • 🚫 The judge warns Trump that failure to appear in court will result in an arrest warrant, highlighting the seriousness of the situation.
  • 🤔 Mary Trump is asked to comment on how her uncle might be processing these strict instructions and the limitations they impose on his usual activities.
  • 💭 It is suggested that Trump is unaccustomed to not controlling the narrative or proceedings, which could lead to a significant psychological impact.
  • 🧵 The discussion touches on Trump's history of fundraising off perceived grievances and how this situation might be used similarly.
  • 🚷 The standard operating procedure of a 'parking warning' in criminal courtrooms is emphasized, indicating Trump is not being treated differently from other defendants.
  • 📺 There is a debate about the absence of cameras in the courtroom, with arguments presented for both transparency and the potential for Trump to exploit the situation.
  • 😴 A New York Times reporter noted that Trump fell asleep during the trial, which could be due to exhaustion from tweeting or psychological stress.
  • 🤔 The lack of visual and audio access to the trial is considered a disservice to the public, who have a right to witness the judicial process.
  • 👥 The conversation includes speculation on how Trump's behavior in the controlled environment of a courtroom might be perceived by those not typically part of his base.
  • ⚖️ The importance of the American public seeing the judicial process at work is underscored, especially given the significance of the trial.

Q & A

  • What is a 'parking warning' in the context of a criminal trial?

    -A 'parking warning' is a standard operating procedure in criminal trials where the defendant is informed of their rights and the consequences of disrupting court proceedings, which may include exclusion from the courtroom and potential jail time.

  • How might Donald Trump's reaction to the 'parking warning' be different from other defendants due to his personality?

    -Donald Trump, having been used to controlling narratives and proceedings, might find it challenging to adapt to a situation where he has limited control. His personality, which includes a need for control and a history of reacting strongly when feeling cornered, could make it difficult for him to comply with the court's instructions.

  • Why might the absence of cameras in the courtroom be considered a 'travesty'?

    -The absence of cameras in the courtroom could be seen as a 'travesty' because it prevents the public from witnessing the judicial process unfold in real-time. This is particularly significant given the high-profile nature of the case and the public interest in seeing justice served transparently.

  • What could be some potential negative effects of having cameras in the courtroom for Donald Trump?

    -Having cameras in the courtroom could provide Donald Trump with additional ammunition to fundraise and rally his base. It might also allow him to control the narrative outside the courtroom by spinning the events to his advantage.

  • How might the presence of cameras affect the public's perception of Donald Trump during the trial?

    -The presence of cameras could reveal aspects of Trump's behavior that typically play well with his base but may not resonate as positively with a broader audience. His lack of impulse control and focus could be perceived negatively in the strict setting of a courtroom.

  • Why did Donald Trump reportedly fall asleep during the trial, according to the New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman?

    -It is suggested that Donald Trump may have fallen asleep due to being tired from being up all night tweeting, but it could also be attributed to the psychological stress and trauma he is experiencing as a result of the situation he finds himself in.

  • What is the significance of this trial in American history?

    -This trial is significant as it involves a former president who is seeking to return to the White House, making it one of the most important trials in American history. It highlights the judicial process and the accountability of even the highest officeholders.

  • Why might Donald Trump's campaign activities be affected by the trial?

    -The trial could affect Trump's campaign activities because he would be required to attend court on specific days, potentially limiting his ability to participate in campaign events, rallies, or other political engagements.

  • What is the general consensus on the importance of transparency in the judicial process?

    -The general consensus is that transparency in the judicial process is crucial. It allows the public to see the justice system at work and ensures that the proceedings are fair and open, which is particularly important in high-profile cases.

  • How might the lack of live audio or video from the courtroom impact the public's understanding of the trial?

    -The lack of live audio or video could limit the public's ability to fully understand the nuances of the trial, including the judge's instructions, the defendant's reactions, and the overall atmosphere of the proceedings. It may also reduce the public's trust in the process if they cannot directly observe it.

  • What is the role of social media, such as live tweeting, in providing updates on the trial?

    -Social media, including live tweeting, serves as a way to provide real-time updates and commentary on the trial. It helps to fill the gap left by the absence of cameras in the courtroom, offering a play-by-play account of the events as they unfold.

  • Why might Donald Trump's behavior in the courtroom be different from his typical public persona?

    -In the courtroom, Donald Trump would be subject to the rules and decorum of the judicial process, which could restrict his typical behavior. He would not be able to control the narrative as he does at rallies or press conferences, potentially revealing a different side of his personality to the public.

Outlines

00:00

🏛️ Donald Trump's Courtroom Dynamics and Psychological Impact

The first paragraph discusses the impact of a judge's restrictions on Donald Trump's behavior during a criminal trial. It highlights Trump's unfamiliarity with not controlling the narrative or proceedings and suggests that this lack of control is causing him significant psychological stress. The discussion also touches on Trump's potential reaction to the situation, including his inability to campaign or engage in his typical behaviors while subject to the court's authority. The paragraph notes the absence of cameras in the courtroom, which prevents the public from witnessing Trump's conduct during the trial, and the reliance on live tweets for information. It concludes by considering whether the lack of visual access to the trial may inadvertently benefit Trump by allowing him to control the narrative post-trial.

05:01

📹 The Debate Over Cameras in the Courtroom

The second paragraph delves into the debate surrounding the presence of cameras in the courtroom during Trump's trial. It contrasts opinions about the potential benefits and drawbacks of having cameras, which would provide a transparent view of the judicial process but could also provide Trump with additional opportunities to fundraise and appeal to his base. The paragraph emphasizes the unique nature of Trump's trial, being a high-profile case with significant historical implications. It also discusses the importance of the public's ability to observe the judicial process, suggesting that the absence of cameras and audio is a disservice to the American people. The conversation concludes with the assertion that regardless of the outcome of the trial, the lack of public visibility into the courtroom proceedings is a loss for transparency and public trust.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Donald Trump

Donald Trump is a former President of the United States and a central figure in the transcript. He is mentioned in the context of a criminal case and a judge's instructions regarding his conduct in court. His personality and behavior are discussed in the context of the trial and its implications for his public image.

💡Judge

A judge is a public official appointed to decide cases in a court of law. In the transcript, the judge is instructing Donald Trump about courtroom conduct and the consequences of disrupting proceedings, highlighting the formal and authoritative role of a judge in a criminal trial.

💡Criminal Case

A criminal case involves a person accused of committing a crime under the law. The transcript discusses Donald Trump's involvement in a criminal case and the potential impact on his behavior and public perception, emphasizing the serious nature of the legal proceedings.

💡Courtroom Conduct

Courtroom conduct refers to the expected behavior of individuals within a court of law. The transcript includes a judge's warning to Donald Trump about the consequences of disrupting the proceedings, illustrating the importance of decorum and respect within a legal setting.

💡Arrest Warrant

An arrest warrant is a legal document issued by a court that authorizes police to arrest an individual. In the transcript, the judge informs Donald Trump that failing to appear in court will result in an arrest warrant, demonstrating the binding nature of court orders and the consequences of non-compliance.

💡

💡Campaigning

Campaigning refers to the activities undertaken by individuals or groups to promote a particular political agenda or candidate. The transcript suggests that Donald Trump's involvement in a criminal trial may limit his ability to campaign, indicating how legal issues can affect political activities.

💡Gag Order

A gag order is a legal restraint that prevents certain information from being publicly disclosed. The transcript mentions a future gag order violation hearing, which implies restrictions on what can be said publicly about the case, highlighting the legal mechanisms that can control the flow of information in a trial.

💡Psychological Trauma

Psychological trauma refers to the emotional and mental stress resulting from a distressing event. The transcript discusses the potential psychological impact of the trial on Donald Trump, suggesting that the experience may be causing him significant stress and discomfort.

💡Narcissism

Narcissism is a personality trait characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance and a need for admiration. The transcript uses the term to describe Donald Trump's alleged reaction to the trial, suggesting that his personality may be influencing his response to the legal proceedings.

💡Livestreaming

Livestreaming is the act of broadcasting live content over the internet. The transcript discusses the lack of live audio or video from the courtroom, which is a point of contention among the speakers. They argue that livestreaming could provide the public with a more transparent view of the trial.

💡Judicial Process

The judicial process refers to the procedures and practices involved in the administration of justice in a court of law. The transcript emphasizes the importance of the judicial process and the public's respect for it, particularly in the context of a high-profile trial involving a former president.

Highlights

Mary Trump discusses her uncle Donald Trump's relationship and his current legal situation.

A parker warning is issued to Donald Trump, outlining the rules of conduct during his trial.

Trump is informed he could be excluded from the courtroom and face jail time if he disrupts the proceedings.

Mary Trump comments on the psychological impact of the trial on Donald Trump, noting his lack of control over the situation.

The discussion suggests that Trump is likely to raise funds off the trial, positioning himself as an aggrieved party.

Mary Trump explains that this is a rare situation where Trump does not control the narrative or proceedings.

The transcript mentions Trump's past behavior and how it contrasts with the strict conduct required in a criminal courtroom.

Concerns are raised about the lack of cameras in the courtroom, which prevents the public from seeing the judicial process.

Mary Trump speculates on Trump's unpreparedness for the trial and his potential inability to manage the situation well.

The psychological trauma and narcissistic injury Trump might be experiencing due to the trial are discussed.

A New York Times reporter's observation that Trump fell asleep during the trial is mentioned, possibly due to stress or exhaustion.

The absence of cameras in the courtroom is debated, with arguments for and against their presence.

The potential benefit for Trump to control the narrative outside the courtroom is discussed.

Concern is expressed that cameras could provide Trump with more ammunition to rally his base.

The importance of transparency in the judicial process and the public's right to see it is emphasized.

The discussion highlights the significance of the trial in American history, being one of the most significant.

Mary Trump predicts that Trump's lack of impulse control and focus will not play well with the public in a strict courtroom setting.

The transcript concludes with a call for transparency and the public's right to witness the judicial process in action.

Transcripts

00:01

marry again thanks for joining us mary i know that

00:02

one of the things are always asked is your relationship with

00:06

your uncle who is donald trump but i would to read something

00:08

specifically to you because i thought you'd be the best best

00:11

guess for this and that's going to be something called a

00:15

park are warning if we could bring that up on the screen

00:18

so the following went down with judge were shot down today with

00:21

donald trump or sen says you have the right to be present

00:24

during the trial and to assist your attorneys do you

00:26

understand trump says yes marshawn says if you disrupt

00:30

the proceedings you could be excluded from the courtroom and

00:33

committed to jail based on your conduct and the trial will

00:36

continue on in your absence do you understand trump

00:40

answers yes excuse me i do marshawn then says if you

00:44

do not show up there will be an arrest do you understand

00:49

trump's as i do mary trump mehring himself now

00:53

pun totally intended to a criminal case and a criminal

00:57

courtroom but mary the question i have for you is how

01:00

it is going down in donald trump's head the fact that you

01:03

now have a judge telling him you can't be anywhere but

01:07

court monday tuesday thursday friday he can't come

01:11

in or out until the judge lets him do it it's a mother

01:13

may i experience for him right

01:15

can't campaign can't be doing this and and he's

01:19

looking at a future

01:20

gag order violation hearing that we're going to get into a

01:23

little bit later with our legal voices let me talk about what

01:26

this is doing to donald trump just after how many hours

01:30

seven hours yeah it yeah and and you can go to oral

01:35

arguments in front supreme court i that's right yeah

01:39

before i answer that excellent question i just want to as as

01:43

the lay person in the group just let everybody you guys

01:48

those much better than i but it's really important to

01:51

point out that

01:52

parking warning is it's it's ten or so the donald trump is

01:57

already going to be raising money off of this has the

02:00

aggrieved party as if this is just been created to punish him

02:07

and treated differently from other criminal defendant

02:09

so i think it's always important to remind people that

02:13

this is standard operating procedure

02:17

he just the reason it doesn't feel like that to him is

02:21

because when it is life has she ever been in a situation in

02:25

which he does not control either the narrative or the

02:29

proceedings this is rare and this is i would suggest

02:33

since this is a criminal trial the most serious case in which

02:38

he is had virtually no control over anything that happens

02:41

inside that courtroom and indeed over anything that

02:44

happens to him if you stepped outside of the lines that

02:49

judgment on headset so he is quite honestly i know we said

02:55

this many times and it's been sure many times

02:59

he's freaks out when he feels like the walls are closing and

03:02

he freaks out and and access when he feels more did because

03:09

he so rarely ever has been i mean we're looking at a very

03:13

old and fairly complex psychology that goes back to

03:16

his childhood so for for the cows finally be coming home

03:22

when he's in his late seventies it's something that

03:25

he is not going to be able to manage well i think it's it's

03:29

a travesty as you said katie and joyce that there are no

03:33

cameras in the courtroom that there's no a live audio of

03:37

what's happening in this courtroom thankfully there

03:40

are live streamed live tweets so we can get sort of a play by

03:45

play

03:48

it's very different to be able to see the facial expressions

03:52

and the body language and i think we just need to when we

03:58

do get have the benefit of of the live tweeting and the

04:01

commentary that's going to be coming up later we see

04:05

though in some of the other guests to to take a step back

04:08

and realize that this is a unique situation and all fronts

04:15

life he is totally unprepared for it he never believed it

04:21

would come to this

04:23

there's a reason he tried to get this case the laid up

04:26

until the eleventh hour so he's not fairing well

04:30

the fact that he fell asleep

04:32

with according to new york times reporter maggie haberman

04:35

and there's no reason to doubt her is it because he was just

04:38

tired although that probably true because he was up all

04:41

night tweeting but it's also because of the this

04:45

psychological trauma he's experiencing the narcissistic

04:49

with that he's suffering right now is basically shorts are

04:53

getting him

04:55

so we we don't know if he was asleep he could have

05:00

contemplating beings

05:03

could have been that is he so coming up with a generally

05:05

speaking his contemplative i think it's an adjective for

05:10

him but were your view a sleeping although there there

05:13

were a few moments right when his eyes are closed but

05:14

you know mary i wanted to stick with this idea of the no

05:16

cameras because i've been reading different schools of

05:19

thought

05:20

i'm really good arguments of both sides some people think

05:23

it's a travesty i think the three of us would agree that

05:25

there's no cameras no idea why because i would love to

05:28

see the park or warrants being issued to donald trump as you

05:31

said and as joyce agrees we all agree parker morning is a

05:35

normal experience in a criminal courtroom all criminal

05:38

defendants are advised of a park are warning

05:41

but at this on that but on the flip side some people said

05:44

mary it would just help him because the narrative that he

05:48

does try to control is when he gets out of the courtroom

05:50

he likes to do the spin and so maybe it would be good

05:54

to see him being berated by the judge are being read as parker

05:57

warning the one that we're seeing on the full screen right

05:58

now so mary i mean i guess it is there any merit to the

06:02

idea that actually having cameras or video or audio

06:05

excuse me coming out of the courtroom would be a bad idea

06:08

for somebody like donald trump isn't just going to give more

06:10

ammunition to fundraise

06:13

listen to his base is his base they're not listening to

06:16

us they're not they're not listening to anybody is going

06:20

to contradict don't drop so

06:23

i guess that's true for that but we're talking about the

06:28

most sick significant trial at least one of them in

06:31

american history when a lot

06:34

yeah the the first formal trial of a somebody who was in

06:39

the white house and

06:40

wants to be in the white house again so you're going we're

06:43

going to have a much wider audience than we might

06:47

otherwise of and i think

06:50

the reason one of the main reasons like just a grey is

06:54

with the the assessment that it will help him is because we're

06:58

going to be seeing donald trump again in it in a unique

07:03

context usually at a rally or at a press conference he is

07:08

controlling the room he is controlling the narrative and

07:11

any gaffes or ramblings can be put down to he's riffing

07:17

he's i don't know doing improv you know it's always

07:20

explained away in this situation when he can't do

07:23

that he can't speak out of turn he needs permission and

07:28

we're going to see certain traits that seemed to play well

07:33

with people his his focus sluggishness that's part of

07:37

sec his lack of impulse control right and we're going

07:41

to see them

07:42

in a a very

07:47

strict setting that is you know what the american people

07:51

a good have a lot of respect for the judicial process

07:57

you know jurors it just in case there's any doubt in

08:00

anybody's mind jurors take their jobs very seriously

08:04

and people watching trials take them very seriously especially

08:06

if there's a judge in there who has a very for hand so we're

08:13

going to see donald

08:15

thinking that he's being tough and just looking in that short

08:19

and looking like he just cannot control himself

08:26

it's not going to play well with the people who don't go to

08:29

his rallies to the people who don't tune in all the time

08:33

who were kind of seeing this for the first time and i think

08:37

again not having cameras and audio quite honestly

08:41

regardless of how it plays outside of the courtroom is a

08:44

disservice to the american people we don't make these

08:46

decisions based on who it benefits or not it benefits

08:50

the american people to be able to see the wheels of justice

08:55

turning which by the way we've been denied for very

08:58

very long time

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Donald TrumpCriminal TrialPsychological ImpactCourtroom TransparencyLegal ProceedingsJudge's WarningPolitical ImplicationsMedia CoveragePublic InterestControl LossFundraising Narrative
日本語の要約は必要ですか?