‘The Five’ reacts to Trump’s unanimous Supreme Court victory

Fox News
4 Mar 202412:16

Summary

TLDRThe transcript details Donald Trump's celebration of a 9-0 Supreme Court victory allowing him to be on the ballot, despite Colorado's attempt to bar him due to the Insurrectionist Clause. Reactions from experts and pundits are shared, with some expressing disappointment and concerns about threats to democracy, while others hail the decision as upholding constitutional rights and the will of voters. The ruling's implications for upcoming elections and the ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump are also discussed, highlighting the intense polarization and high stakes involved.

Takeaways

  • 😃 Donald Trump celebrated a 9-0 Supreme Court victory allowing him to be on the ballot, despite attempts to bar him under the Insurrectionist Clause of the 14th Amendment.
  • 😔 Critics expressed disappointment, stating that the ruling undermines the ability to hold accountable those who violated their oaths and threatened democracy.
  • 🤔 The decision impacts over 30 states and sets a precedent that states cannot bar federal candidates from running.
  • 🤬 Trump supporters accused his critics of being consumed by hatred and disregarding the Constitution in their efforts to stop him at all costs.
  • ✊ The ruling was seen as a win for democracy, ensuring that voters can have their voices heard rather than being disenfranchised by legal challenges.
  • 🧐 While the conservative justices ruled that Congress has the sole authority on this issue, some liberal justices disagreed with the broadness of the decision.
  • 😏 Trump's supporters claim that each legal challenge he overcomes only strengthens his position and popularity among his base.
  • 🙄 Critics accused Trump's detractors of engaging in a campaign of lawfare, using legal challenges as a strategy to circumvent the will of the voters.
  • 🤯 The decision highlights the deep political divisions and polarization surrounding Trump's candidacy and the 2024 election.
  • ⚖️ The ruling underscores the pivotal role of the Supreme Court in adjudicating high-stakes political issues and shaping the democratic process.

Q & A

  • What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding Donald Trump's eligibility to run for president?

    -The Supreme Court unanimously ruled 9-0 in favor of Donald Trump, rejecting Colorado's attempt to keep him off the presidential ballot due to the insurrectionist clause of the 14th Amendment.

  • Why did Colorado try to keep Trump off the ballot?

    -Colorado attempted to keep Trump off the ballot based on the insurrectionist clause of the 14th Amendment, citing his alleged involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot, though he was never charged with insurrection.

  • How did the Supreme Court's decision impact other states?

    -The ruling impacted over 30 states that were considering similar efforts to bar Trump from running for president based on the insurrectionist clause.

  • What was the reaction of Trump's supporters to the Supreme Court's decision?

    -Trump's supporters celebrated the decision as a victory for democracy and a rejection of what they saw as politically motivated attempts to prevent Trump from running for office.

  • How did Trump's opponents react to the Supreme Court's decision?

    -Trump's opponents expressed disappointment and concern that the decision would allow someone they consider a threat to democracy to run for president again.

  • What was the reasoning behind the Supreme Court's unanimous decision?

    -The conservative justices argued that Congress, not individual states, has the sole authority to determine if the insurrectionist clause applies, while the liberal justices disagreed with how broad the decision was in giving Congress exclusive power.

  • How did the media's coverage of the case impact public perception?

    -The script suggests that the media gave false hope to Trump's opponents by indicating the case had a chance, only to reverse course after the unanimous decision, leading to accusations of lying and misleading the public.

  • What does the script imply about the broader strategy of Trump's opponents?

    -The script implies that Trump's opponents are pursuing a strategy of using legal challenges and indictments to label him as a felon, with the goal of dissuading voters from supporting him, rather than relying on winning at the ballot box.

  • How did the Supreme Court's decision impact the upcoming presidential election?

    -The decision affirmed that voters, not the courts or individual states, would ultimately decide whether Trump could run for president again, making the upcoming election crucial in determining his political future.

  • What was the significance of the 9-0 unanimous decision?

    -The unanimous 9-0 decision was seen as a decisive victory for Trump and a resounding rejection of the legal efforts to disqualify him from running for president, suggesting that the court found the arguments against him unconvincing.

Outlines

00:00

🗳️ Trump's Victory at the Supreme Court

This paragraph discusses Donald Trump's victory at the Supreme Court, where the court rejected Colorado's attempt to keep him off the ballot due to the insurrectionist clause of the 14th Amendment. Despite not being charged with insurrection, the decision is celebrated as a win for democracy. However, critics express disappointment, believing that states should be able to bar oath-breaking candidates, and warn that democracy remains under threat.

05:01

⚖️ Dissecting the Supreme Court Ruling

The summary delves into the nuances of the Supreme Court's ruling. It highlights the unanimous decision by the conservative justices, who stated that Congress decides on such matters. The liberal justices objected to the breadth of the decision, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed reservations about limiting the authority to Congress alone. Concerns were raised about the timing of the ruling and its potential impact on the volatile political climate.

10:03

🎯 Strategies and Criticisms Surrounding Trump's Legal Battles

This paragraph critiques the strategies employed by Democrats and the media in their efforts to prevent Trump's candidacy. It accuses them of engaging in tactics such as labeling Trump as a felon, circumventing the will of the people through legal maneuvering, and relying on polling data rather than evidence. The paragraph also alleges a broader campaign to undermine Trump's political success and portrays the legal battles as a means to an end, rather than a pursuit of justice.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Insurrection

Insurrection refers to a violent uprising or rebellion against an established government or authority. In the context of the video, it is used in relation to the events of January 6, 2021, when supporters of former President Donald Trump stormed the US Capitol building, disrupting the certification of the 2020 presidential election results. The video discusses the Supreme Court's decision regarding Trump's eligibility to appear on the ballot, which was challenged based on the Insurrectionist Clause of the 14th Amendment, which bars individuals who have engaged in insurrection from holding federal office.

💡14th Amendment

The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution is a crucial amendment that addresses citizenship rights, due process, and equal protection under the law. In the video, the focus is on the Insurrectionist Clause of the 14th Amendment, which states that individuals who have engaged in insurrection against the United States or given aid and comfort to its enemies cannot hold federal office. The video discusses the Supreme Court's ruling on whether this clause could be used to disqualify Donald Trump from appearing on the ballot due to his alleged involvement in the events of January 6, 2021.

💡Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. In the video, the Supreme Court's unanimous 9-0 decision is celebrated by Donald Trump and his supporters, as the Court rejected Colorado's attempt to keep Trump off the ballot based on the Insurrectionist Clause. The video highlights the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling, which impacts over 30 states and has implications for Trump's ability to run for federal office in the upcoming election.

💡Democracy

Democracy is a system of government in which power is vested in the people, who exercise their will through elected representatives or direct voting. In the video, concerns are raised about the threat to democracy posed by the events surrounding January 6, 2021, and the potential disqualification of a presidential candidate. The ruling is seen by some as protecting democracy by ensuring that voters have the opportunity to choose their preferred candidate, while others argue that democracy remains under attack and that the upcoming election will be crucial for its preservation.

💡Ballot

A ballot is a document or system used to record votes in an election. In the context of the video, the Supreme Court's ruling ensures that Donald Trump's name will appear on the ballot in various states, allowing voters to choose him as a candidate in the upcoming presidential election. The video highlights the significance of this decision, as it overrules attempts by some states to keep Trump off the ballot based on the Insurrectionist Clause.

💡Indictment

An indictment is a formal accusation or charge of a crime, typically issued by a grand jury or prosecuting authority. The video mentions that every time Donald Trump is indicted (referring to the various legal cases and investigations against him), his support among his base seems to grow stronger. This suggests that the legal challenges and indictments aimed at disqualifying or discrediting Trump may have the opposite effect on his supporters, galvanizing their support for him.

💡Litigation

Litigation refers to the process of resolving disputes through the judicial system, typically involving lawsuits and legal proceedings. In the video, there is a suggestion that Democrats should stop relying solely on litigation to prevent Donald Trump from appearing on the ballot or winning the election. Instead, they are advised to focus on campaigning and trying to convince voters directly, as the legal challenges have proven unsuccessful in disqualifying Trump.

💡Partisan

Partisan refers to an individual or group that strongly supports a particular political party or cause, often in an overly biased or unreasoning manner. The video portrays the efforts to disqualify Donald Trump as being driven by partisan motivations and a hatred for him, rather than objective legal reasoning. The partisan nature of the challenges is highlighted, with accusations that they stem from a desire to prevent Trump from winning the election at any cost, rather than upholding the principles of democracy.

💡Felon

A felon is an individual who has been convicted of a felony, which is a serious crime punishable by imprisonment or, in some cases, death. The video suggests that the overall strategy of those seeking to disqualify Donald Trump is to label him as a felon, as polls have shown that voters would be less likely to support a candidate with a felony conviction. This strategy is portrayed as being driven by political motivations rather than a genuine concern for justice or the rule of law.

💡Voter

A voter is an individual who has the right to vote in an election, typically based on citizenship and age requirements. The video highlights the importance of the voters' role in deciding the outcome of the election, as the Supreme Court's ruling ensures that Donald Trump's name will appear on the ballot, allowing voters to choose him as a candidate. The video suggests that the legal challenges aimed at disqualifying Trump were an attempt to circumvent the will of the voters and undermine the democratic process.

Highlights

Donald Trump celebrated his 9-0 victory at the Supreme Court, which rejected Colorado's attempt to keep him off the ballot due to the Insurrectionist Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The ruling impacts over 30 states and is seen as a reversal of efforts to prevent Trump from running for office.

Critics express disappointment, believing states should be able to bar oath-breaking candidates, and warn that democracy remains under threat.

Supporters argue the 14th Amendment does not apply to states disqualifying federal candidates, and accuse critics of being consumed by hatred and trying to suppress votes.

The Supreme Court's decision is seen as helping Democrats face reality that litigation will not stop Trump from being on the ballot, and they need to focus on campaigning.

The ruling was not unanimous, with Amy Coney Barrett expressing concern about the broad interpretation that Congress is the only body that can decide on the Insurrectionist Clause.

Critics accuse the media and pundits of falsely raising hopes about the case's success and now admitting they need to win at the ballot box.

Supporters argue that every attempt to indict or challenge Trump has made him stronger, and the opposition's hatred is fueling his momentum.

Some suggest the ruling is a victory, but part of a broader strategy to label Trump as a felon, driven by polling data rather than morality.

The goal is seen as circumventing voters by using lawfare tactics to disqualify Trump, rather than engaging in political debates and campaigns.

Attacks on Justice Clarence Thomas are noted, despite the unanimous decision, possibly due to his wife's involvement.

Suggestions are made to increase the number of Supreme Court justices to balance the conservative majority.

The decision is seen as a reminder that elections, not litigation, are the appropriate way to determine the outcome.

The ruling is described as a sobering moment for those who thought litigation could prevent Trump from being on the ballot.

The decision is praised as a unanimous victory for liberty and the country, and a rebuke of efforts to undermine democracy.

Transcripts

00:36

>> IT IS A VERY BIG DAY FOR

00:40

LIBERTY AND IT IS A GREAT DAY

00:43

FOR THIS COUNTRY.

00:45

>> DONALD TRUMP CELEBRATING HIS

00:49

9-0 VICTORY AT THE

00:49

SUPREME COURT.

00:51

SUPREME COURT.

00:51

THEY REJECTED COLORADO'S ATTEMPT

00:52

TO KEEP HIM OFF THE BALLOT.

00:54

THE DECISION FOLLOWING MONTHS OF

00:55

DEBATE OVER WHETHER HE WAS IN

00:59

VIOLATION OF THE INSURRECTIONIST

01:00

CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT.

01:03

DESPITE HIM NEVER BEING CHARGED

01:05

WITH INSURRECTION AND THIS IS

01:07

QUITE THE REVERSAL.

01:11

NOW THAT IT HAS FAILED, SHE SAYS

01:13

IT IS UP TO VOTERS TO SAVE

01:16

DEMOCRACY.

01:17

>> MY LARGER REACTION IS

01:19

DISAPPOINTMENT.

01:20

I BELIEVE STATES SHOULD BE ABLE

01:23

TO BAR OATH BREAKING.

01:27

IT WILL BE UP TO AMERICANS.

01:34

DEMOCRACY REMAINS VERY MUCH

01:35

UNDER ATTACK AND UNDER THAT

01:37

THREAT.

01:38

THIS UPCOMING ELECTION WILL BE

01:41

CRUCIAL.

01:44

>> THE RULING IMPACTING OVER 30

01:47

STATES.

01:47

I AM SUPPOSED TO INFORM ALL OF

01:49

YOU WE ARE IN THIS TEMPORARY

01:51

STUDIO SO WE CAN GET READY TO

01:55

SOUP THE LACK -- GET READY FOR

02:05

COVERAGE.

02:06

THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE EIGHT

02:08

NO HUMBLE PIE TODAY.

02:10

>> SHE IS A TRUMP HATER AND THAT

02:13

IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT.

02:14

WHEN YOU GET THE SUPREME COURT

02:17

TO AGREE THAT IT IS

02:21

INCONCEIVABLE AND INCONGRUOUS TO

02:22

ASSUME SOMEONE THAT HOLD STATE

02:26

OFFICE CAN THROW SOMEONE OR

02:27

DISQUALIFY SOMEONE WHO IS A

02:29

CANDIDATE FOR FEDERAL OFFICE,

02:32

THE WHOLE THING -- IF YOU READ

02:34

THE TEXT OF THE SECTION THREE OF

02:36

THE 14TH AMENDMENT, IT IS CLEAR

02:38

IT DOES NOT APPLY TO THE STATES.

02:39

THIS HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF

02:44

MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND

02:44

NANCY PELOSI'S DOCUDRAMA,

02:48

CONVINCING PEOPLE THERE WAS AN

02:51

INSURRECTION AND DONALD TRUMP

02:51

WAS AN INSURRECTIONIST WHEN HE

02:53

HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED OR

02:55

CONVICTED.

02:58

COLORADO'S HIGHEST COURT SHOULD

02:59

BE ABLE TO BAR HIM AND THE

03:02

ILLINOIS -- I THINK SHE WAS A

03:04

TRAFFIC COURT JUDGE IN ILLINOIS.

03:06

SHE THINK SHE SHOULD HAVE THE

03:08

POWER TO DECIDE A NATIONAL,

03:11

FEDERAL ELECTION.

03:12

THESE PEOPLE ARE SO OBSESSED AND

03:13

CONSUMED WITH HATRED THEY DON'T

03:15

CARE WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS.

03:18

TO THEM IT IS ABOUT WE HAVE TO

03:19

STOP HIM AT ALL COSTS.

03:21

THEY TALK ABOUT THREATS TO

03:23

DEMOCRACY WHEN THEY USE LANGUAGE

03:25

LIKE WE HAVE TO SUPPRESS THE

03:26

VOTES IN THEIR DECISION AND THEY

03:29

ARE TRYING TO PREVENT AMERICANS

03:31

FROM VOTING.

03:33

THIS IS A GROUP THAT IS SO

03:35

INTIMIDATED AND FEARFUL THAT

03:36

DONALD TRUMP IS AHEAD OF

03:38

JOE BIDEN THEY WILL USE EVERY

03:38

MEANS THEY CAN AND IN THE END,

03:45

THIS IS AN INTERESTING CASE.

03:47

THE SUPREME COURT REALIZED IT

03:48

WAS IMPORTANT TO DECIDE IT TODAY

03:50

EVEN THOUGH THE COURT WASN'T

03:51

MEETING AT 10:00 A.M., THEY

03:54

ISSUED THE DECISION AND THEY DID

03:55

THAT BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT

03:58

ANYONE TO VOTE ON SUPER TUESDAY

04:00

AND NOT THINK THEIR VOTE WAS

04:02

GOING TO MATTER.

04:03

THAT IS SAVING DEMOCRACY, NOT AL

04:11

MAKE SURE COLORADO -- THAT MEANS

04:16

PEOPLE ARE DISENFRANCHISED FROM

04:18

VOTING IN A FEDERAL ELECTION.

04:20

IT IS ALL LUNACY AND TRUMP EIGHT

04:22

AND THE SUPREME COURT KNOCKED IT

04:24

DOWN.

04:25

>> DOES THIS HELP DEMOCRATS DEAL

04:27

WITH REALITY SO THEY STOP

04:30

THINKING THE LITIGATION IS GOING

04:30

TO STOP AND MAYBE HE WON'T BE ON

04:33

THE BALLOT AND START TO THINK WE

04:34

HAVE TO GET SERIOUS ABOUT TRYING

04:36

TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO MAKE THIS

04:40

ELECTION?

04:42

>> THE SECRETARY OF STATE IS

04:46

FURTHER OUT OVER HER SKIS THAN

04:51

THE AVERAGE DEMOCRAT.

04:51

EVEN IF THEY THOUGHT THERE WAS

04:52

MERIT TO THE DECISION, THEY

04:56

STILL WOULD HAVE RATHER HE BE ON

04:57

THE BALLOT BECAUSE OF WHAT THAT

05:01

MEANS FOR THE FUTURE.

05:01

THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN ANOTHER

05:05

JANUARY 6, BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE

05:07

WHO WOULD CLAIM WE DID NOT GET A

05:11

CHANCE TO EXERCISE OUR

05:11

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

05:13

WE THINK THIS IS THE APPROPRIATE

05:14

DECISION BUT WE WOULD RATHER HIS

05:16

NAME BE THERE.

05:17

YOU HEARD THAT WHEN THE MAIN

05:19

DECISION WAS COMING DOWN BECAUSE

05:20

THAT WAS UNILATERAL.

05:23

THAT WAS ONE WOMAN DECIDING.

05:31

IT WAS A SOBERING WEEKEND.

05:33

WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE

05:33

POLLS THAT CAME OUT IN THE NEXT

05:38

BLOCK.

05:42

THE INSURRECTION CLAUSE DOESN'T

05:47

SAY

05:47

INSURRECTIONIST.

05:49

THE SUPREME COURT WAS UNIFIED.

05:53

THERE WERE "THE FIVE"

05:54

CONSERVATIVES WHO SAID CONGRESS

05:57

DECIDES AND JAMIE RASKIN HAS

05:59

TALKED ABOUT THEY WERE WRITING A

06:00

BILL TO HAVE HIM BARRED.

06:03

>> WHICH IS A HUGE WASTE OF

06:06

TIME.

06:06

>> I AM JUST SAYING THAT IS THE

06:08

EFFECT.

06:09

YOU HAD "THE FIVE" CONSERVATIVES

06:10

AND THEN YOU HAD THE FOUR  

06:14

OTHERS.

06:15

THE THREE LIBERAL JUSTICES WHO

06:17

OBJECTED TO HOW BROAD THE

06:21

DECISION WAS IN TERMS OF WHAT WT

06:24

THE CONSERVATIVES SAID WITH

06:25

CONGRESS SAYING THE COLORADO

06:27

CASE DOESN'T WORK BUT IT DOESN'T

06:28

MEAN CONGRESS IS THE ONLY BODY

06:30

THAT SHOULD DECIDE THIS AND YOU

06:32

HAD AMY TONY BARRETT, IT IS

06:37

ESSENTIALLY 5-4 WHO WENT AGAINST

06:38

THIS AND SHE SAID I DON'T AGREE

06:41

WITH EVERYTHING THE LIBERAL

06:44

FEMALE JUSTICES SAID, BUT I WANT

06:46

TO MAKE IT KNOWN THAT IT IS TOO

06:48

SOON TO SAY CONGRESS IS THE ONLY

06:50

DELIBERATING BODY WHO CAN DO

06:51

THIS.

06:53

>> SHE SAID SHE DOESN'T LIKE THE

06:55

FACT THAT THIS IS SETTLING A

06:58

POLITICALLY CHARGED ISSUE IN A

07:01

VOLATILE PRESIDENTIAL SEASON AND

07:02

WHY DIDN'T YOU TURN DOWN THE

07:04

NATIONAL TEMPERATURE ARE NOT UP.

07:06

THAT IS WHAT THE THREE LIBERAL

07:08

JUSTICES WERE DOING.

07:09

>> WHEN YOU TAKE A SHOT AT A

07:12

POLITICIAN AND YOU FAIL, IT

07:14

USUALLY MAKES THAT POLITICIAN

07:16

STRONGER.

07:16

>> THESE ARE THE DAYS I ENJOY

07:20

DOING "THE FIVE."

07:21

YOU LOOK AT YOUR PHONE AND YOU

07:23

SEE 9-0 AND YOU CAN'T WAIT TO

07:24

SIT NEXT TO JESSICA.

07:27

WE CAN ALL JUST BASK IN THE

07:30

GLORY OF THE SUPREME COURT'S

07:31

DECISION, UNANIMOUS, 9-0.

07:34

YOU CAN GET INTO THE WEEDS AND

07:36

TALK ABOUT THE LADY CAUCUS, I

07:38

WOULD RATHER JUST LOOK AT 9-0.

07:41

SO MANY PEOPLE GAVE THE COUNTRY

07:43

FALSE HOPE.

07:46

THESE PEOPLE WENT TO LAW SCHOOL.

07:47

EVEN I CANNOT READ -- EVEN I CAN

07:54

READ THE 14TH AMENDMENT THAT

07:56

THIS WAS NOT GOING TO GO THE WAY

07:57

THE DEMOCRATS THOUGHT IT WAS

07:58

GOING TO GO.

08:01

THESE PEOPLE, THEY CALL THEM

08:03

JUDICIAL PUNDITS AT THE NETWORKS

08:06

AND ON CABLE, CAME OUT STRONGLY

08:08

SAYING THIS CASE HAD A SHOT.

08:11

NOW, THE SAME PEOPLE ARE SAYING,

08:16

WE KNEW IT WAS GOING TO BE A

08:18

UNANIMOUS DECISION.

08:18

THEY ARE LYING TO YOU.

08:22

EVERYONE HAS BEEN LYING TO YOU.

08:24

THEY ARE GETTING EVERYONE'S

08:26

HOPES UP.

08:29

THEY ARE THEY ARE ALL OF A

08:30

SUDDEN HAVING TO GRAPPLE WITH

08:31

THE FACT THAT THIS IS -- THIS IS

08:33

A DIRECT QUOTE, WE ARE GOING TO

08:35

HAVE TO WIN THIS AT THE BALLOT

08:38

BOX.

08:39

THEY ARE ADMITTING THIS WAS THE

08:41

STRATEGY.

08:42

THEY ARE ADMITTING THEY HAVE

08:44

NOTHING EXCEPT LAWYERS AND

08:45

JUDGES.

08:46

THEY WANT TO PERSUADE A FEW

08:48

JUDGES, NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

08:50

IF YOU LOOK AT THE POLLS, THE

08:52

AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE NOT BEEN

08:53

PERSUADED AND IT DOESN'T LOOK

08:55

LIKE THEY WILL BE PERSUADED.

08:57

EVERY TIME HE IS INDICTED, HE IS

09:00

STRONGER.

09:01

EVERY TIME HE BEATS THESE SILLY

09:02

WRAPS, HE IS STRONGER.

09:05

YOU CAN SEE THE GEORGIA CASE,

09:06

THE JACK SMITH DECISION, EVEN

09:10

THE BRAD CASE.

09:11

EVERY TIME THEY HAVE CREATED A

09:12

MONSTER AND THEY ARE OVERRIDING

09:13

HATE FOR THIS MAN.

09:15

IT IS WEIRD.

09:18

HE HAD A NICE FOUR YEARS.

09:22

NO ONE WAS THROWN IN PRISON, WE

09:24

DIDN'T HAVE ANY WARS, THE

09:26

ECONOMY WAS HOT, THE STOCK

09:27

MARKET WAS HOT.

09:29

THERE WERE PROBLEMS LIKE WE ARE

09:33

DEALING WITH NOW.

09:33

>> ONE THING I NOTICE, THERE ARE

09:38

ALL OF THESE ATTACKS AGAINST

09:41

CLARENCE THOMAS TODAY.

09:44

IT WAS A 9-0 DECISION.

09:45

THEY JUST WANTED TO ATTACK

09:47

CLARENCE THOMAS?

09:50

>> BECAUSE HE IS BLACK.

09:55

>> NO, BECAUSE HIS WIFE.

10:00

>> JESSICA, I AGREE.

10:02

WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT

10:03

THIS MAGGOT SUPREME COURT.

10:08

9-0.

10:09

I HEARD, THIS IS A RUMOR THAT

10:14

SOTO MEYER JUSTICE KAGAN

10:16

WERE LISTENING TO TOBY KEITH

10:18

TWIRLING THEIR RED HATS.

10:20

THIS IS WHY WE NEED TO GET MORE

10:23

JUSTICES INTO THE SUPREME COURT,

10:25

SO WE CAN BALANCE THIS EXTREME

10:27

NINE.

10:28

IT IS A BUMMER THAT IT IS UP TO

10:30

THE VOTERS.

10:34

ELECTIONS SEEM SO OLD-FASHIONED

10:36

WHEN YOU CAN RELY ON LIBERAL

10:38

TRAFFIC JUDGES, LIBERAL

10:39

PROSECUTORS NDA TO CIRCUMVENT

10:41

THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE AND LAW

10:46

FARE IS WHAT DEMOCRATS DO

10:48

INSTEAD OF DEBATING AND

10:51

CAMPAIGNING.

10:53

IMAGINE YOU HAVE THE

10:55

WORLD SERIES AND INSTEAD OF THE

10:57

TEAM PLAYING, THE OWNERS

10:59

INVESTIGATE THE STAR PLAYERS OF

11:01

EACH TEAM, TRYING TO GET THEM

11:03

OUT BEFORE THE GAME IS PLAYED.

11:06

YOU CAN TAKE THIS AS A VICTORY,

11:08

BUT THIS IS PART OF A BIGGER

11:11

STRATEGY.

11:16

THEY ARE DOING IT ALREADY.

11:17

THEY GET LOVE FROM THE MEDIA.

11:20

THE REASON THESE JUDGES ARE

11:22

DOING THIS IS BECAUSE IT IS

11:25

INCENTIVIZED.

11:26

YOU CAN GO FROM SECURITY IN

11:27

COLORADO OR ILLINOIS AND YOU GET

11:31

A WARM BATH UNTIL THE STUNT

11:33

FALLS APART.

11:34

THE BIG PLAY, THE GOAL IS TO

11:35

LABEL TRUMP AS A FELON.

11:39

THEY WILL TRY TO PRETEND THIS IS

11:40

A MORAL MISSION BUT IT IS NOT.

11:43

IT IS DIRECTED BY POLLING.

11:45

THEY SAW A POLL THAT VOTERS

11:47

WOULD BE LESS LIKELY TO VOTE FOR

11:49

TRUMP IF HE WERE A FELON AND

11:51

THEY START THERE AND WORK

11:53

BACKWARDS.

11:54

THEY DON'T CARE IF HE IS GUILTY

11:56

OR IS HE NEEDS TO PAY.

11:58

THEY WANT TO CIRCUMVENT THE

12:00

VOTER BY USING LAW FAIR BASED

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
PoliticsElectionDemocracyLegalControversyTrumpEraPartisanDivideVoterRightsSupremeCourtConstitutionalLaw
Вам нужно реферат на русском языке?