'Full 9-alarm fire': Honig reacts to transcript from Trump hush money trial

CNN
24 Apr 202410:05

Summary

TLDRThe transcript from a trial reveals a detailed account of interactions between David Pecker, CEO of the National Enquirer's parent company, and Donald Trump, focusing on the handling of Karen McDougal's story. McDougal, a former Playboy model, alleges a relationship with Trump, which was allegedly suppressed by Pecker. Pecker's testimony details a phone call from Trump inquiring about McDougal and the suggestion to buy her story. Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, is described as agitated and under pressure during calls about the matter. The transcript also includes Pecker's observation of Trump's meticulous review of invoices and checks, suggesting Trump's direct involvement in financial transactions. The summary indicates a high-stakes situation within Trump's circle and the National Enquirer, with implications for the ongoing legal case.

Takeaways

  • 📰 The transcript from the trial reveals a deep dive into the alleged cover-up of a story involving former Playboy model Karen McDougal and Donald Trump by David Pecker.
  • 🤝 David Pecker, the Chairman of American Media Inc., testified about his interactions with Trump and his former attorney, Michael Cohen, regarding the Karen McDougal story.
  • 📞 Trump allegedly asked Pecker about the rumors surrounding McDougal and was advised by Pecker to buy the story to keep it out of the press, which Trump initially seemed hesitant to do.
  • 📉 Michael Cohen was described as being very agitated and anxious during calls about McDougal, suggesting he was under significant pressure to resolve the situation.
  • 💸 Trump was portrayed as being detail-oriented and closely involved in the financial transactions related to the alleged cover-up, including signing checks.
  • 🚫 The transcript indicates that there was a conscious effort to avoid creating a paper trail for the alleged affair between Trump and McDougal.
  • 🤔 Pecker's testimony suggests that he is not aligned with Trump, as he provided detailed accounts of his interactions that could potentially harm Trump's case.
  • 💭 The discussion implies that Trump was cautious about his money and reluctant to pay large sums for the story, indicating the financial aspect was a significant concern for him.
  • 🔍 The prosecution aims to establish a clear chain of communication and intent, showing that Trump was not only aware of the situation but actively involved in handling it.
  • 📉 The transcript suggests a sense of panic or urgency within Trump's circle regarding the McDougal story, highlighting the high stakes of the situation.
  • 📈 The case is complex, and the prosecution is building it incrementally, with the transcript serving as a foundation for further investigation and potential evidence.

Q & A

  • What is the significance of the transcript from the trial mentioned in the script?

    -The transcript is significant as it provides a detailed account of the proceedings in a case involving David Pecker, the former CEO of the National Enquirer, and allegations related to Donald Trump and his alleged relationships with Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels.

  • What does Karen McDougal claim about her contract and her reasons for telling her story?

    -Karen McDougal claims that her contract is illegal, she was not presented correctly, and she was lied to. She wants the rights back to her story because she feels others are discussing her truth without her consent.

  • How does David Pecker describe his interactions with Donald Trump regarding Karen McDougal?

    -David Pecker recounts being pulled out of a meeting by a phone call from Donald Trump, who asked about the rumors regarding Karen McDougal. Pecker advised Trump to buy the story to take it off the market, but Trump said he would think about it and have Michael Cohen call Pecker back.

  • What is the role of Michael Cohen in the alleged scheme?

    -Michael Cohen is portrayed as an intermediary between David Pecker and Donald Trump. He is described as being very agitated and under pressure during calls about Karen McDougal, suggesting he was acting on Trump's behalf.

  • What does the prosecutor, Josh Stein Glass, ask David Pecker about Michael Cohen's tone during the calls?

    -Josh Stein Glass asks Pecker to describe Michael Cohen's tone during the calls about Karen McDougal, to which Pecker responds that Cohen was very agitated and seemed increasingly anxious with each call.

  • How does the script suggest that Donald Trump was involved in the handling of the Karen McDougal story?

    -The script suggests that Trump was very detail-oriented and closely involved in the handling of the Karen McDougal story. It mentions that Trump would review invoices and checks, indicating a high level of personal involvement.

  • What is the implication of David Pecker's testimony about Donald Trump's business practices?

    -Pecker's testimony implies that Trump was not only aware of the corporate records but also actively involved in reviewing and signing off on financial transactions, including those related to the alleged hush money payments.

  • Why is the fact that David Pecker had direct contact with Donald Trump significant?

    -The direct contact is significant because it establishes a clear chain of communication between Pecker and Trump, which could be crucial in proving Trump's involvement in the alleged scheme to suppress the Karen McDougal story.

  • What does the script suggest about the nature of the relationship between Donald Trump and Michael Cohen?

    -The script suggests that while Michael Cohen was acting on behalf of Trump, there is a question of reliability due to Cohen's own legal troubles and the fact that he might have been acting independently in some instances.

  • How does the script describe the potential impact of a recorded conversation between Michael Cohen and Donald Trump?

    -The script suggests that the recorded conversation, where Trump allegedly instructs Cohen to 'get it done' regarding the payment to Karen McDougal, could be problematic for the prosecution as it might imply Trump's direct involvement in the alleged scheme.

  • What is the broader context of the discussion about Donald Trump's financial dealings as mentioned in the script?

    -The broader context is that Trump, known for being careful with his money, was reluctant to part with significant sums for the alleged hush money payments. This detail is important as it could reflect his level of concern and involvement in the transactions.

Outlines

00:00

📝 Trial Transcript Analysis

The first paragraph discusses the release of the full trial transcript, highlighting the role of reporters in disseminating court proceedings. It focuses on John Berman's examination of the transcript, particularly the testimony of David Pecker concerning the alleged cover-up of Karen McDougal's story and her alleged relationship with Donald Trump. The summary also includes McDougal's own words from her only television interview, where she expresses her belief that the contract she signed was illegal and her desire to share her truth. The paragraph ends with a discussion on the pressure Michael Cohen was under, as indicated by Pecker's testimony, and the implications of Trump's transition from a public figure to the President of the United States.

05:00

🔍 Direct Communication and Financial Scrutiny

The second paragraph delves into the implications of David Pecker's direct communication with Donald Trump and the establishment of a chain of communication. It raises questions about Michael Cohen's reliability and whether he was truly acting on Trump's behalf. The summary outlines Pecker's observation of Trump's involvement in the transaction and his attention to detail, contradicting the notion that Trump was not closely involved. The paragraph also discusses the significance of Trump's business practices, his reluctance to part with money, and the potential impact of a recorded conversation between Michael Cohen and Donald Trump on the case.

10:01

💵 Financial Concerns and Trump's Involvement

The third paragraph is brief, focusing on the financial aspect of the case that concerned Trump. It suggests that the monetary implications were a significant point of interest for Trump, which aligns with the detailed financial scrutiny mentioned in the previous paragraphs.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Transcript

A transcript is a written version of either spoken language or a conversation, which is being referred to in the context of a trial. In this video, the transcript is of significant importance as it captures the details of the trial proceedings, including testimonies and interactions that are central to understanding the case's developments.

💡David Pecker

David Pecker is the chairman and CEO of American Media, Inc., the company that owns the National Enquirer. In the video, his testimony is highlighted as crucial to the case, particularly regarding his involvement with the alleged 'catch and kill' scheme involving Karen McDougal's story.

💡Karen McDougal

Karen McDougal is a former Playboy model who allegedly had a relationship with Donald Trump. Her story is central to the video's narrative as it involves a 'catch and kill' operation, where a story is bought with the intent of suppressing it, allegedly orchestrated by David Pecker.

💡Catch and Kill

The term 'catch and kill' refers to a practice where a publication acquires the rights to a story with no intention of publishing it, effectively burying the story to protect someone from negative publicity. In the video, this concept is integral as it is suggested that David Pecker used this tactic with Karen McDougal's story about Donald Trump.

💡Michael Cohen

Michael Cohen is an attorney who formerly worked for Donald Trump. In the video, he is depicted as a key figure in the alleged scheme, with references to his anxiety and involvement in discussions about Karen McDougal's story, indicating the pressure he was under.

💡Testimony

Testimony in a legal context refers to the evidence presented by a witness under oath during a trial. In the video, David Pecker's testimony is particularly highlighted as it provides insights into the interactions between him, Michael Cohen, and Donald Trump regarding Karen McDougal's story.

💡Chain of Communication

A chain of communication refers to the sequence of people through whom a message or information passes. In the video, establishing this chain is important to demonstrate the direct contact between David Pecker and Donald Trump, and subsequently, Michael Cohen's involvement.

💡Prosecution

The prosecution in a legal context is the team responsible for presenting the case against the defendant in a criminal trial. In the video, the prosecution is actively involved in questioning and revealing details from the trial's transcript, aiming to build a case around the testimonies and evidence presented.

💡

💡Donald Trump

Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, is a central figure in the video's narrative. The discussions revolve around his alleged involvement in the 'catch and kill' scheme regarding Karen McDougal's story, and the implications it has on his character and the case.

💡Anxiety

Anxiety, as referenced in the video, is the nervous tension felt by Michael Cohen, which is suggested to stem from the pressure applied by Donald Trump. It is used to illustrate the urgency and the weight of the situation that the characters find themselves in.

💡Corporate Records

Corporate records are the official documents and records kept by a company, which may include financial transactions, legal documents, and other business-related records. In the video, the mention of corporate records is significant as it pertains to the legality and traceability of the transactions in question.

💡Daily Transcript Release

The daily transcript release refers to the practice of making the court's daily proceedings publicly available. In the video, it is mentioned that a motion was filed to have these transcripts released, which is a significant aspect of the case's public exposure and transparency.

Highlights

David Pecker, CEO of American Media Inc., testifies about his conversations with Donald Trump and Michael Cohen regarding Karen McDougal's story.

Pecker says Trump asked him what he thought about buying the rights to McDougal's story from the National Enquirer.

Pecker advised Trump to buy the story to take it off the market, but Trump said he would think about it and have Cohen call back.

Pecker describes Cohen as being very agitated and anxious during phone calls about McDougal.

Prosecutor asks Pecker about Michael Cohen's tone during calls, and Pecker says Cohen seemed under a lot of pressure.

Pecker says he assumed Cohen was getting pressure from Trump to resolve the situation.

Pecker testifies that Trump was very detail-oriented and involved in the transaction, despite not knowing specifics like legal fees.

Pecker recounts observing Trump reviewing and signing invoices and checks in his office, indicating his close attention to finances.

Pecker's testimony suggests he is not on Trump's side, as he provides damaging information against him.

The transcript reveals a chain of communication between Pecker, Trump, and Cohen regarding the handling of McDougal's story.

The case hinges on establishing that Trump was aware of and signed off on the corporate records related to the transaction.

Pecker's testimony is just the opening salvo, with more details about the McDougal story expected to emerge.

Prosecutors aim to show that the situation created a 'nine-alarm fire' in Trump's world, causing panic and scrambling.

The transcript includes a rare instance of direct contact between Pecker and Trump, as most interactions were through Cohen.

A key question is whether Cohen was truly acting on Trump's behalf or operating independently.

Pecker testifies that Trump was closely following the McDougal situation and even signed checks related to it.

The defense may argue that Trump's attention to detail is not unusual for a businessman of his caliber.

An upcoming key piece of evidence is a secretly recorded phone call between Cohen and Trump discussing the McDougal payment.

The tape may show Trump telling Cohen to handle the situation without getting into the specifics, which could be problematic for the prosecution.

The case also highlights Trump's reluctance to part with large sums of money, even for matters he considered important.

Transcripts

00:01

News.

00:01

Now we have the full transcript.

00:03

Transcript from the trial today.

00:04

And even though

00:05

virtually nothing happens in court

00:06

without a team of reporters

00:08

posting it online

00:09

almost in real time,

00:10

even the fastest reporter

00:11

can capture the scope and the sweep

00:12

in the full context

00:13

of the complete record does.

00:15

Senior

00:15

John Berman has been going through it,

00:17

including more of David Pecker

00:18

testimony in the caption

00:19

Kill Scheme in the heart of the case.

00:21

Some of it deals with former

00:22

Playboy model Karen McDougal.

00:24

The story of her alleged

00:25

relationship with Trump was caught

00:27

and killed by David Pecker.

00:29

Before we bring

00:30

you details of the transcript,

00:31

I just want to play for you

00:32

what Karen McDougal told me

00:33

in her only television interview

00:34

about why she decided to tell her story.

00:38

I feel like the contract is illegal.

00:40

I feel like I wasn't presented correctly.

00:42

I was lied to.

00:43

And everybody involved in this deal,

00:46

I want the rights back

00:47

and I want to share my truth

00:49

because everyone else

00:49

is talking about my truth, which there

00:52

I need to share my story.

00:53

Do you have any regrets

00:54

about the relationship

00:56

that you say you had with him back then?

00:58

Yeah.

01:01

The only regret I have

01:02

about the relationship

01:03

that I had with Donald

01:04

was the fact that he was married

01:07

and John Berman joined me.

01:09

John, you've been digging

01:09

deeper in the transcript.

01:10

What what stands out?

01:11

First of all,

01:12

this is the transcript of just today.

01:14

So you can see how much paper

01:15

comes out here

01:16

and the part

01:16

where they talk about Karen

01:17

McDougal was at the very end of today's

01:20

hearing, the prosecution

01:21

save the Karen McDougal part in in here.

01:24

David Pecker recounts

01:25

being pulled out of a meeting

01:27

from a phone call by Donald Trump to

01:29

ask about the various

01:31

whispers have been going on

01:32

about Karen McDougal.

01:33

We don't have graphics in this,

01:34

but let me read this to you.

01:35

Pecker says in the testimony

01:37

he mentioned to me, he said,

01:38

I spoke to Michael Michael Cohen.

01:40

He said he told me about that time.

01:43

He told me about that.

01:44

He said he told me about Karen.

01:46

He said to me, what do you think this is,

01:49

Pecker saying that Trump asked him,

01:51

What do you think about Karen McDougal?

01:53

Pecker goes on to say,

01:53

I believe you should buy it.

01:55

I believe you.

01:55

Trump should buy the Karen

01:57

McDougal story.

01:58

Trump said to me, Look,

01:59

everything he says, I don't buy stories.

02:02

And he said that any time you do

02:03

anything like this,

02:04

it always gets out, Pecker says.

02:06

I still

02:06

believe we should take the story off

02:08

the market.

02:08

Trump says,

02:09

Let me think about it,

02:10

and I'll have

02:11

Michael Cohen call you in a few days.

02:13

And this we do have a graphic of later

02:15

in the testimony Pecker talks

02:17

about how he was

02:18

speaking to Michael Cohen.

02:19

This is Josh Stein Glass, the prosecutor.

02:21

How would you describe

02:22

Michael Cohen's tone during those calls

02:24

about Karen McDougal?

02:25

Pecker says Michael was very agitated.

02:28

It looked like

02:28

he was getting a lot of pressure

02:29

to get the answer, like right away.

02:31

Stan Glass asks, What makes you say that?

02:34

Pecker says he kept on calling in.

02:36

Each time he called,

02:37

he seemed more anxious.

02:38

Sunglasses. Did you understand?

02:40

Did you understand?

02:41

As to wear that pressure to find out

02:42

more was coming from, Pecker says.

02:44

Well, you know,

02:45

I assumed he had a conversation with Mr.

02:47

Trump, and Mr.

02:48

Trump was asking Michael Cohen,

02:50

Did we hear anything yet?

02:52

You would have objection.

02:53

You can't assume so.

02:54

As you hear the word assume

02:55

objection, Well,

02:56

he was jumping up

02:57

before I was a witness testify.

03:00

I assume this or I assume that that's not

03:02

those aren't facts or objection. Right.

03:04

I apologize for just

03:06

that's my instinct on what I do.

03:09

Find the transcript fascinating.

03:11

I'm dying to read it.

03:12

And actually,

03:13

a friend of mine, Jim Walden,

03:14

who was a brilliant attorney, he's

03:16

the one who filed the motion

03:17

asking for the daily transcript

03:19

to be released.

03:20

The people who aren't too happy about it,

03:21

the court reporters who get paid

03:23

daily copy to do this.

03:25

But you know, again,

03:27

these aren't crimes

03:28

like nothing that you just spoke about

03:29

is a crime.

03:31

Michael Cohen, being anxious

03:32

is not a crime.

03:33

It just means it's something

03:34

that they're interested in.

03:35

And that'll be when, you know,

03:36

you talk about the relationship

03:37

changing in 2015.

03:39

We now know that

03:41

when you declare yourself

03:42

for public office,

03:44

whether it's city council person

03:46

or prison United States,

03:48

they come out

03:48

they're coming to get you,

03:49

which is now why

03:50

we don't get good people

03:51

running for office anymore

03:52

because they go back to high school

03:54

and see what you did back then.

03:55

So I'm not surprised

03:56

that once Trump goes

03:57

from being a TV star

03:58

and a real estate magnate

04:00

to being president, United States,

04:02

all these people come out

04:03

and yeah, it's

04:04

a mutually beneficial society

04:05

and they're there to help each other.

04:07

To me, the the anxiety of Michael Cohen

04:10

was spoke to the pressure

04:12

from Trump assumed from Trump.

04:15

So I mean, that's

04:16

the only reason that that matters.

04:17

But the other thing I would just note,

04:18

I mean, the Karen

04:19

McDougal story is not over.

04:21

This is just the beginning

04:23

of what we will learn about

04:24

this Karen McDougal story.

04:25

And when you look

04:27

at the charging documents here for Trump,

04:29

there are some hints

04:30

about where this goes next.

04:33

David Pecker ends up paying her,

04:35

but at some point

04:36

he decides to not get reimbursed

04:38

from Trump world.

04:39

And I'm curious as to why that happened.

04:41

So this is the opening salvo,

04:42

but there's more to come.

04:43

So again,

04:44

you're not going to find the crime A to Z

04:47

found in any one paragraph of testimony.

04:49

Prosecutors have to build a case here.

04:51

And I think two things jump out at me

04:52

from that transcript.

04:53

One this is a full nine alarm

04:55

fire in Trump world

04:56

and in the National Enquirer

04:58

in Pekar's environment.

05:00

They are

05:01

I mean, they're pulling each other

05:02

out of meetings.

05:03

Borderline panicking.

05:04

The other thing is it

05:05

establishes a really important chain

05:06

of communication

05:07

because this is one

05:08

of the rare instances.

05:08

There's a few

05:09

where David Pecker has direct contact

05:11

with Donald Trump.

05:12

Most of it's with Michael Cohen.

05:14

And the weakness

05:15

that Arthur just pointed out is, well,

05:17

how do you know that Michael Cohen

05:18

was truly acting

05:20

on Donald Trump's behalf?

05:21

You can't assume you're right

05:23

and you're

05:23

maybe Michael

05:24

Cohen was just a free agent.

05:25

I mean, Michael

05:25

Cohen is not super reliable,

05:26

but the chain here is David Pecker

05:30

makes contact with Donald Trump,

05:31

who essentially hands him off

05:33

to Michael Cohen says

05:33

Cohen's going to handle

05:34

is you to go and do your thing.

05:36

I'll have Michael Cohen call you

05:37

back in a few days.

05:39

One of the things, though,

05:40

that David Pecker said today

05:42

and correct me

05:43

if I'm wrong on the stand, was that

05:45

according to him,

05:47

Trump was very detail oriented

05:49

and actually paid attention

05:51

to a lot of the mundane details

05:55

of this transaction.

05:56

He's not saying that

05:57

he was aware

05:58

that the line item was a legal fee, but

06:02

he's indicating

06:03

Trump was very much involved in this.

06:05

And what you just read,

06:06

John, also backs that up.

06:08

Then,

06:09

according to Cohen and Bill

06:10

Cohen will probably testify,

06:11

is that Donald

06:11

Trump is breathing down his neck

06:13

very closely

06:14

following the Karen McDougal.

06:16

He talked about how he would sit

06:18

with Trump in Trump Tower

06:19

on the 26th floor

06:20

and Trump's

06:22

assistant at the time

06:22

would come in and bring him

06:24

invoices and checks,

06:25

which I thought was

06:26

a really notable moment

06:27

I have that I could read

06:28

and Donald Trump would sign it.

06:29

I can read that.

06:30

This is from page 1002 of the transcript

06:33

signing checks. Stein Glass.

06:34

Joshua Stein Glass.

06:35

The prosecutor asks,

06:36

Did you have occasion over the years

06:38

to observe Mr.

06:39

Trump's business practices?

06:40

Pecker responds Yes.

06:43

Josh Stein Glass asks, In what context?

06:45

Pecker responds, I was

06:46

I had a meeting with Mr.

06:47

Trump in his office,

06:48

and when I was there,

06:49

his assistant, Rona,

06:50

brought in a batch of invoices

06:52

and checks to sign.

06:53

And I observed Mr.

06:54

Trump and I notice that he reviewed

06:56

the invoice and looked at the check,

06:58

and then he would

06:59

he was signing them

07:00

that tells you a couple of things.

07:02

First of all, it's very important that

07:05

the prosecution

07:06

establish that Donald Trump

07:08

signed, knew

07:10

what knew

07:10

what the corporate records were.

07:12

That's what this whole case is about.

07:14

The other thing that tells you

07:15

is that

07:16

David Pecker is not on Team Trump.

07:19

He didn't have to give

07:20

that kind of testimony.

07:21

That was

07:22

he was burying Donald Trump with that,

07:24

you know, when I interviewed Jeffrey.

07:26

Well,

07:26

I agree with you, but I'll tell you why.

07:29

I'll tell you one good reason,

07:30

because jaws in 2000

07:32

shark moves on the

07:33

Remora fish is all alone.

07:35

Well, okay.

07:36

I agree with.

07:37

But you could also be anything

07:38

you could have figured out

07:39

a way to charge him

07:40

But but wait a

07:41

you know,

07:42

did David pick horse before the cart?

07:44

I mean, this is witness number one.

07:46

He has even been cross-examined, yet

07:48

there is still a lot of road

07:49

love to go here.

07:50

And I think what they're

07:51

establishing, though,

07:52

is that Trump paid

07:53

very close attention to all.

07:54

We all know his finances.

07:55

He doesn't part easily with his money.

07:57

I was looking Karen

07:58

McDougal wrote a lot down

08:00

about her

08:00

relationship with Trump

08:01

when they were having

08:02

this alleged affair, which Trump denies.

08:04

But she wrote down

08:05

that Trump was so careful with his money,

08:07

he was so worried about

08:07

creating a paper trail

08:09

of their relationship

08:10

that she would book her travel

08:11

when they would meet

08:12

places and Trump would reimburse.

08:13

I mean, let's just

08:14

step back for a second.

08:16

If a guy, a married guy

08:19

is having an affair and and having sex

08:23

allegedly with a porn star

08:25

and it's starting to unravel,

08:29

he's going to pay very close attention,

08:31

I would imagine,

08:32

to every detail

08:34

of how this is being hushed up.

08:35

I mean, is this not just

08:37

this is not something you would do?

08:38

I don't care

08:39

if he's the top

08:40

executive of whatever you would think.

08:43

This is actually something

08:44

I would actually want to

08:46

know all the details.

08:47

And that's I guess this

08:48

he wanted to know.

08:49

He wanted he he says at one point

08:52

to Michael Cohen,

08:53

this has to be paid in cash, doesn't he?

08:55

I mean, at one point he's

08:56

talking about this

08:57

needing to be done in cash.

08:58

That's not a tape

08:59

that Michael Cohen

09:00

that we're going to hear

09:00

soon in this trial,

09:01

Michael Cohen

09:02

secretly recorded Donald Trump

09:03

a shady move. By the way.

09:04

I asked

09:05

I four

09:06

defense lawyers

09:06

in the green room with me today.

09:07

I said,

09:07

have you ever

09:08

even thought about

09:09

this is absolutely something

09:10

that threatens your marriage?

09:12

Are you going to leave it up to

09:13

Michael Cohen?

09:13

Well,

09:14

the guy can go every detail

09:16

without checking, like being an overlord.

09:18

That's what a commonsense,

09:20

rational person would do.

09:21

But the tape

09:21

that we're talking about here

09:22

that Michael Cohen makes up,

09:23

Donald Trump

09:24

actually suggests Donald Trump is like

09:26

just get it done.

09:27

He's not in the weeds

09:28

In fact, at one point,

09:29

Michael Cohen says, no, no, no, no, no,

09:30

I got it.

09:31

Alan and I are going to handle you.

09:33

Don't worry about it.

09:33

We're going to pay him.

09:34

You don't worry about the how and the

09:35

how is the crime.

09:36

So when that tape comes up, that's going

09:37

be a problem. For the prosecution.

09:39

I also think that,

09:40

you know, part of the thing

09:40

about Trump

09:41

paying attention to details is more to

09:43

what Caitlin was saying,

09:44

which is the amount of money,

09:45

even for a very rich person

09:47

like Donald Trump,

09:48

he didn't really want to part ways

09:50

with $150,000

09:52

for Karen McDougal, 130 for Stormy.

09:54

He did not want to part ways

09:55

with that money.

09:56

He has

09:57

to pay his attorney

09:58

he tried to get out of it

09:59

once the election was over.

10:00

So it's really about

10:02

the dollars here

10:03

that was concerning to him.

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
TrumpTrialTranscriptKaren McDougalDavid PeckerNational EnquirerAffair AllegationsLegal FeesNon-DisclosureMedia InfluencePolitical Scandal
Вам нужно реферат на русском языке?