"TIME OUT!" Alan Dershowitz And Mustafa Barghouti Debate Aaron Bushnell and Israel-Hamas
Summary
TLDRThe video script revolves around a heated debate regarding the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly the situation in Gaza. Professor Cornell West faces scrutiny for his tweet labeling a protester who self-immolated outside the Israeli embassy as a martyr, drawing comparisons to historical figures. Contrasting viewpoints clash, with West defending Palestinians' right to resist occupation and Alan Dershowitz accusing Hamas of using human shields. The discussion escalates as they exchange arguments about terrorism, genocide claims, and the potential for a ceasefire, revealing deep ideological divides on this complex issue.
Takeaways
- 👤 Professor Cornel West defended Aaron Bushnell's self-immolation as an act of 'extraordinary courage' and a protest against the 'genocide' of Palestinians in Gaza.
- ⚖️ There was a heated debate on whether Israel's actions in Gaza constitute 'genocide', with West accusing Israel of enabling genocide while others disagreed with the use of that term.
- 🇵🇸 Mustafa Barghouti, a Palestinian leader, claimed that Israel's actions amount to 'genocide, collective punishment, and ethnic cleansing', citing high civilian casualties and destruction in Gaza.
- 🇮🇱 Alan Dershowitz, an Israeli advocate, argued that Israel is acting in self-defense against Hamas terrorism and denied claims of genocide, accusing Hamas of using human shields.
- 📟 Kamala Harris, the US Vice President, called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza for at least six weeks, highlighting the 'immense scale of suffering' there.
- 🔝 The debate centered around the definition of 'genocide', the use of human shields by Hamas, the proportionality of Israel's response, and the release of hostages as a condition for a ceasefire.
- 💥 Both sides accused each other of propagating lies and misinformation regarding the conflict, leading to a heated and emotional exchange.
- 🕊️ There were calls for a peaceful resolution to the conflict, with some advocating for Hamas to follow the path of non-violence as embraced by leaders like Martin Luther King Jr.
- 📚 Historical accounts and interpretations of events, such as the 1948 partition plan and the origins of the conflict, were also debated.
- 🌐 The debate highlighted the deep divisions and polarized views surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, both internationally and within the United States.
Q & A
What was the main controversy surrounding Cornel West's tweet about Aaron Bushnell?
-Cornel West referred to Aaron Bushnell, who set himself on fire outside the Israeli Embassy in protest, as displaying 'extraordinary courage and commitment.' This drew criticism from many who felt West was glorifying Bushnell's act of self-immolation, which some viewed as the action of someone mentally disturbed.
How did Cornel West justify his characterization of Aaron Bushnell's actions?
-West likened Bushnell's act to moral witnesses like Cato the Younger killing himself to protest the fall of the Roman Republic. West argued that Bushnell was bearing witness to the 'suffering of precious Palestinians in Gaza' and called attention to what he described as a 'genocide' taking place.
What was Ben Shapiro's criticism of Cornel West's tweet?
-Ben Shapiro criticized West for celebrating the 'pseudo heroism of disturbed people lighting themselves on fire,' arguing that such celebration facilitates 'dangerous insanity' in society and puts mentally disturbed individuals at risk.
How did Cornel West respond to the criticism of his tweet?
-West stood by his characterization of Bushnell as a 'martyr,' arguing that trying to bring attention to genocide is a 'higher cause' worth paying the ultimate price for. He also accused his critics of being indifferent to the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza.
What was Alan Dershowitz's main argument against Cornel West's claims?
-Dershowitz argued that West's use of the term 'genocide' to describe Israel's actions is a form of Holocaust denial and a disgrace, given that Israel is simply trying to defend itself. He also accused Hamas of using human shields and maximizing civilian casualties, while Israel tries to minimize them.
How did Mustafa Barghouti respond to Dershowitz's claims?
-Barghouti denied that Hamas uses human shields, calling it 'Israeli propaganda.' He argued that the high civilian casualties in Gaza, including numerous children, constitute genocide, ethnic cleansing, and collective punishment by Israel.
What was the position of Vice President Kamala Harris on the conflict?
-Harris called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza for at least six weeks, citing the 'immense scale of suffering' there. This was part of a negotiated deal being discussed at the time.
What was the main point of contention between Dershowitz and Barghouti?
-A key disagreement was over whether Hamas uses human shields and civilian infrastructure for military purposes. Dershowitz claimed Hamas does this and cited a quote from a Hamas leader, while Barghouti vehemently denied it and called it 'Israeli propaganda.'
What was the proposed solution to the conflict being discussed?
-The proposed solution being discussed involved a six-week ceasefire, coupled with the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas and potentially moving towards a longer ceasefire agreement.
What were the main points of disagreement between the participants in the discussion?
-The main points of disagreement included: whether Israel's actions constitute genocide, the use of human shields by Hamas, the legitimacy of Hamas as a resistance group, the historical context of the conflict, and the conditions for a lasting ceasefire and peace agreement.
Outlines
🗣️ Discussion on Aaron Bushnell's Self-Immolation and Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
The paragraph opens with Cornell West defending his statement praising Aaron Bushnell's self-immolation as an act of courage and commitment to bearing witness to the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza. West draws parallels between Bushnell and historical figures like Cato and argues that his critics are indifferent to the genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza. He maintains a moral stance, stating he will acknowledge courage in calling attention to the suffering, even through self-harm.
🔥 Debate on Hamas, Terrorism, and Israeli Occupation
West and the interviewer engage in a heated debate about Hamas, terrorism, and the Israeli occupation. West argues that Hamas emerged as a counterterrorist group in response to Israeli terrorism and occupation, while the interviewer contends that Hamas is a terrorist organization committing acts of mass terrorism. West criticizes the indifference of Western leaders to Palestinian suffering and their enabling of genocide, while the interviewer accuses West of promoting violence and being biased against Israel. The discussion becomes intense, with both sides defending their positions.
⚖️ Discussion on Genocide, Civilian Casualties, and Moral Consistency
The discussion turns towards the definition of genocide and whether Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide. West maintains a moral consistency, stating that he would condemn the killing of innocent people by any organized army, including Israeli troops, Hamas, or others. He argues that the intent and execution of genocide must be considered, and that Hamas emerged as a response to decades of Israeli occupation and terrorism. The interviewer accuses West of promoting violence and dismissing Hamas' terrorist actions, leading to a heated exchange.
👶 Debate on Children Casualties and Use of Human Shields
The discussion centers on the casualties of children in Gaza and the accusation that Hamas uses human shields. Mustafa Barouti, a Palestinian leader, accuses Israel of killing thousands of Palestinian children and committing genocide, collective punishment, and ethnic cleansing. Alan Dershowitz, an Israeli advocate, argues that Hamas recruits and uses children as human shields, citing a quote from a Hamas leader. Barouti denies the claim, accusing Dershowitz of repeating Israeli propaganda. The debate becomes intense, with both sides presenting their perspectives on the treatment of civilians and children.
🚫 Debate on Hamas' Use of Human Shields and Civilian Casualties
The debate continues over the accusation that Hamas uses civilians as human shields by building tunnels around schools and hospitals. Barouti denies the claim, stating that Hamas builds tunnels to protect civilians from Israeli airstrikes, similar to the Vietnamese during the American War. Dershowitz cites a quote from a Hamas leader praising the use of human shields, leading to a heated exchange over the credibility of the claim and the extent of civilian casualties caused by each side.
☮️ Discussion on Ceasefire, Hostage Release, and Hamas' Future
The discussion shifts towards the proposed ceasefire and the release of hostages. Dershowitz agrees with the American and British plan for a six-week ceasefire coupled with the release of hostages and disabling Hamas from returning to power. Barouti also agrees that Israeli prisoners should be released in exchange for Palestinian prisoners but argues that Palestinians have a right to struggle for freedom from occupation and oppression, following the path of leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. The debate centers on the conditions for peace and the future role of Hamas.
🤼 Heated Debate on Historical Narratives and Use of Human Shields
The debate intensifies as Barouti accuses Dershowitz of repeating Israeli propaganda and challenges him to provide evidence for his claims about Hamas using human shields. Dershowitz promises to provide a quote from a Hamas leader bragging about using human shields, while Barouti remains adamant that Hamas does not engage in such practices. The debate also touches on historical narratives, with Barouti accusing Dershowitz of misrepresenting the acceptance of the 1948 partition plan by Israel. The exchange becomes heated, with both sides questioning each other's credibility and understanding of history.
🔚 Conclusion of the Heated Debate
The debate concludes with Dershowitz challenging Barouti to stake his credibility on the claim that Hamas does not use human shields, while Barouti maintains his position that Hamas does not engage in such practices. The interviewer thanks both guests for their participation in the intense and passionate debate, which covered various aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the use of human shields, civilian casualties, historical narratives, and the future of Hamas.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Genocide
💡Human Shields
💡Ceasefire
💡Hostages
💡Apartheid
💡Terrorism
💡Occupation
💡Self-defense
💡Martyr
💡Ethnic cleansing
Highlights
Cornell West compared Aaron Bushnell's self-immolation to Cato's suicide as an act of moral courage and willingness to bear witness against oppression.
West argued that many of his critics are indifferent to the suffering and genocide happening in Gaza.
West stated he would acknowledge the courage of anyone bearing witness against the killing of innocent people, regardless of their affiliation.
West described the actions in Gaza as a state of emergency requiring urgency, referring to them as massacres happening before our eyes.
West claimed he would be morally consistent in opposing any organized army that kills innocent people, especially children.
West argued that Hamas emerged as a counter-terrorist group responding to the terrorism of the Israeli state, which began in 1948.
Alan Dershowitz accused West of promoting violence by acknowledging Bushnell's actions and called his use of the term 'genocide' for Israel's actions as Holocaust denial.
Mustafa Barghouti stated that over 12,000 Palestinian children have been killed, which he considers an act of genocide.
Barghouti claimed that 4.5% of Gaza's population has been killed or injured, which he stated would be equivalent to 12 million people in the US.
Barghouti accused Israel of committing genocide, collective punishment, and ethnic cleansing simultaneously in Gaza.
Dershowitz challenged Barghouti's claim that Hamas does not use human shields, citing a quote from a Hamas leader praising the use of human shields.
Barghouti equated the Palestinian struggle for freedom to the American Revolution, the Civil Rights Movement, and the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa.
Barghouti stated that if Hamas followed the path of non-violent resistance like Martin Luther King Jr., there would be peace.
Dershowitz argued that if Hamas laid down its arms, there would be peace, while if Israel did so, it would lead to genocide.
The debate centered around whether Hamas uses human shields, with Barghouti denying it and Dershowitz claiming to have evidence from a Hamas leader.
Transcripts
well pressure is again intensifying on
Israel after US vice president kamla
Harris called for a ceasefire in Gaza
and rebuked the humanitarian catastrophe
there opinions on the war are sharply
divided in America Israel's most
important Ally a fact lay bare by the
death of us Amon Aaron bushnel last week
the 25-year-old set himself a light
outside the Israeli Embassy in
Washington DC shouting free Palestine
and declaring he would no longer be
complicit in genocide well presidential
candidate Dr Cornell West stood up
controversy by posting the following to
X let us ever forget the extraordinary
courage and commitment of brother Aaron
Bushnell who died for truth and Justice
I pray for his precious loved ones let
us rededicate ourselves to genuine
solidarity with Palestinians undergoing
genocidal attacks in real time well many
Jewish commentators said Dr West
comments encourage political violence by
those oppos to Israel's existence but
joining me now to discuss his
controversial post is the independent
president candidate Professor Cornell
West Cornell great to see you thank you
very much for coming back on uncensored
um always a blessing to being
conversation with you my brother and the
feeling is is very mutual let me just
just ask you many people were pretty
surprised by the tone of your uh of your
Tweet not least the fact that you would
categorize what Aaron bushnel did as
extraordinary courage and commitment uh
many people think it was the act of
somebody quite possibly
very seriously mentally ill taking his
life in dramatic circumstances and that
that was not necessarily consistent with
being courageous or
committed well one is that U you think
of ko the younger when he killed himself
as the Roman Empire began to emerge and
the Roman Republic was collapsing and
Ko's killing of himself has become one
of the grand examples of moral courage
and a willingness to Bear witness as to
something that he deeply opposed now I
think it's very interesting that so many
of the people who were critical of me
talking about the courage of my dear
brother Aaron that they don't understand
the depths and scope of the suffering
right now in Gaza and too many of them
actually are even indifferent to the
genocide they're indifferent to the
ethnic cleansing they're indifferent to
the apar like conditions and so I can
understand them saying well I am
promoting violence by acknowledging the
tremendous courage in to engage in a
moral witness in which you kill yourself
as a way of calling attention not to
yourself but to suffering of precious
Palestinians in Gaza that's what Aaron
was doing in the same way Kato was doing
the same thing when they saw Julius
Caesar moving into the highest position
and it was clear that the Republic was
coming to a close and the empire was
being established and there's a whole
host of examples of people who bear
Witness by killing themselves let me ask
you this suicide no that's not the point
it's the cause that they are bearing
witness to and that's where my
difference with so many of my deeply
conservative and and moderate Jewish
brothers and sisters comes in if they're
indifferent to the suffering in Gaza
then it's going to be difficult for me
even have a conversation because for me
it's a state of emergency for me we need
a sense of urgency this these massacres
are taking place before our very eyes we
ought to be on fire we ought to be
deeply concerned let me ask you this
would you have said the same thing if
this Airman had killed himself in this
manner outside the Palestinian Embassy
in Washington DC if there is one
whatever the the uh central location is
for Palestinians in Washington the day
after October the 7th and reversed it
and said I'm doing this in response to
the horror committed by Hamas on Jewish
people in Israel would you have felt the
same way about what
happened oh absolutely murder is murder
though brother that when you kill
innocent people when you kill civilians
those are crimes against humanity now I
have a larger indictment of Israeli apar
I have a larger indictment of the
Israeli occupation of Palestinians but
anytime any organized group kills
innocent people especially innocent
children I will be in opposition that's
true for US troops that's true for
British troops that's true for the IDF
that's true for Iranian troops that's
true for Chinese troops that's true for
Indian troops any
organized Army that kills innocent
people especially children
for me is murder I'm morally consistent
in that regard and that therefore if
somebody kills themselves in order to
call attention to the suffering of
precious innocent people especially
precious innocent children I am going to
acknowledge that courage and say it's
wrong it's wrong it's wrong and I don't
mind being morally consistent and
therefore having people thoroughly
misunderstand me because I do not look
at the world through a narrow set of
ideological lens I try to stay in
contact with the humanity of all
innocent people and all children no
matter what color Palestinian Israeli
Ethiopian Guatemalan I fundamentally
believe that a Palestinian baby has the
same value as an Israeli baby the
problem is you and I know that if
Palestinians were doing this to
Israelis
Biden Harris blinkin all of these folks
who are enabling this genocide enabling
these crimes against humanity they would
have a very different view because
they're not morally consistent they
don't believe that a Palestinian life
has the same value as an Israeli I
certainly do but I certainly think I
certainly do but I also believe that the
the purest definition of genocide is
hamas's view of uh Jewish people in
Israel they want to get rid of all of
them they've made it very clear publicly
since October the 7th that they want to
commit that kind of atrocity again and
again and again and just get rid of all
jewi people in Israel that actually is
the purest definition of genocide isn't
it well genocide has to do with intent
as well as execution would you accept
the
Hamas when Hamas was founded in
1988 as a response to vious Israeli
occupation they were wrong they were
calling for the forms of violent
resistance that too often did include
killing innocent folk because of course
innocent Palestinians had been killed
for 75 years by the IDF and others they
did change their Charter there's been
struggles within the Hamas itself and
the Palestinian people themselves
are how would you put it the Palestinian
people themselves are resisting with
tremendous dignity and Hamas has emerged
as a major institutional vehicle and
that institutional vehicles for me does
involve crimes against humanity when
they kill innocent Folk they've em let's
be clear let's be clear they've emerged
as a terrorist terrorist organization
committing acts of mass terrorism I mean
that's what they are know Hamas is a
counterterrorist group responding to the
terrorism of the IDF and responding to
the terrorism of the Israeli State a
counterterrorist group can inv can can
can commit war crimes brother but they
they didn't initiate it at all if
they're founded in
1988 and the terrorism began in 1948
with the state of Israel that's 40 whole
years let's keep in mind I think it's a
stretch to
call undermine the PLO undermine secular
nationalism promote fundamentalist Islam
as a way of dividing Palestinians that's
why Nathan yahu allowed for Gaza allowed
for Hamas to gain to gain access to the
money from Qatar and others keep the
Palestinians divided and therefore not
having to move to deal with the West
there are look there are many things
that we would find agreement on about
the way Palestinians have been treated
for a very long time it has been a
completely unacceptable occupation
should
not but hang on hang on let me I know
let me finish but the idea that you
categorize Hamas after October 7th as
counter terrorists is ridiculous they
are terrorists and they should be called
what they are anyway let me ask you do
do you think the IDF is terrorist when
they kill innocent Palestinians do you
believe I it depends yes or no my
brother yes or no well okay I I would
ask you this if you yes or no yes or no
hang on you're uncensored you're
uncensored my brother and I've been
asked this question before I have
actually tweeted in 2014 I tweeted that
what Israel was doing then was bordering
on terrorism I'm not afraid of using
that analogy bordering on terrorism the
children are being killed right yes of
course they were children killed on
October the 7th I have serious
misgivings about what's happening
currently in Gaza like most people but
what I would say to you if you were the
head of the Israeli government on
October the 7th out of Interest what
would your response have been to that
horrendous terror attack well I I'll
tell you the answer to that question but
I don't know why you just can't say the
IDF is terrorist killers and innocent
people bordering on it it's wrong no
what why you're uncensored you're a free
man tell the truth from your soul tell
let me tell you what I would what I
would do if I was in Israel I would any
occupation I would end The Siege I would
saying I'm committed to Palestinian
dignity I'm committed to Palestinian
equality and we Palestinians and
Israelis we Jews and and and and and
Palestinians we're going to learn how to
live together in the context of equality
and dignity we're going to have Jewish
safety we're going to have Jewish
security that's the very end and aim of
Israel we never see an annihilation of
Jews we'll never see another Massacre or
holy caust of Jews but we'll never see
an ation and and Massacre and and and
and and and and and vicious attacks on
Palestinians either that's what I would
do not just head of Israel that's what
I'll do in the White House brother
that's what I'll do in the white house
and I'll explain to American people why
it is that Biden and Harris and others
continue to enable this genocide and
then when they finally say ceasefire
they act like they ought we ought to
give them a moral Prize or something
after 30,000 precious people have
already been killed yeah listen there's
a lot that you say that I agree with
just to be clear okay no no I I hear you
I hear you okay I just want to read you
what Ben Shapiro said about your Tweet
though about Aaron Bushnell he said our
political environment is facilitating
dangerous Insanity it is easy enough for
people like Cornell West to celebrate
the pseudo heroism of disturbed people
lighting themselves on fire but both the
mentally Disturbed in our society pay
the price for such celebration I mean he
has a point doesn't he you wouldn't want
other people to go and set fire to
themselves
and kill themselves like he did would
you brother I have deep libertarian
sensibilities I believe that people make
choice and they have to take
responsibilities they make decisions
they have to deal with the consequences
I do not promote people killing
themselves not at all but people do a
number of different things I would want
to ask brother Shapiro he's talking
about there's heroes in the Israeli
Defense Forces many of whom are killing
innocent children do do I think that's
sick yes that is morally bankrupt it is
spiritually empty it is ethically
vacuous I come right back at Shapiro
Your Heroes happen to be engaging in
Terrorist activity against Palestinians
and he and you're gonna say Aaron's not
a hero Aaron is a particular person who
exercised a certain kind of witness and
ended up taking the form of killing
himself in order not to bring attention
to himself but to try to give some of
urgency for a genocide do you do you
believe that's what brother super want
to focus on do you believe wants hide
his indifference to the suffering of
Palestinians in the form of attacking
let me ask you how cowardly can you get
my brother do you believe that Aaron
bushnel is a
martyr well martyr and witness really
have the same uh root as you know in the
Greek uh and Martyr means someone who
pays an ultimate cost tied to a higher
cause I believe trying to bring
attention to genocide and bring genocide
to a close is a higher cause and I
believe that his actions was trying to
bring attention to that higher cause so
yes he is a martyr absolutely Dr West uh
always good to talk to you on uncensor
thank blessing stay strong my brother
would you be out to debate all this is
legal scholar and author of war against
the Jews Professor Alan dwizz and the
leader of the Palestinian national
initiative Mustafa barouti well welcome
to both of you um Alan dotz your
response there to Dr West in particular
categorization of Aaron bushnel as a
Marty for setting himself on fire and
and taking his own life in protest what
he said was the genocide of Palestinians
in
Gaza if anybody is going to be a mod
they should take their lives and protest
of hamama using precious children as
human shields uh using a child as a
human shield putting a child a hospital
a school a mosque over Hamas Fighters
and tunnels and other uh weapons that
are used to kill precious Jewish
children is the major reason why so many
civilians particularly so many children
and women have been killed by the way
there is a lower ratio of civilians to
combatants that have been killed in Gaza
than in any Modern Warfare according to
even the Hamas statistics and if you
compare them to the number of people
combatants who have been killed the
ratio is approximately one and a half to
one which is three or four to one the
problem with the problem with that
analogy is that when you actually get
into the statistics and let's accept
this is the Palestinian health authority
it's Hamas run uh but this the numbers
have not been challenged uh as being you
know wildly inaccurate by any other body
but more I'm accepting them for the
moment yeah so more more children have
been killed as a percentage of Civilian
deaths than any other type of conflict
of this nature in Modern Times And the
reason for that is that Gaza Gaza has
two million people of which a million
just over half are under 18 so it's
become de facto a Slaughter of children
that's the problem
well REM remember that Gaza that Hamas
counts anybody under 19 as a child Hamas
recruits children between the ages of 13
and 19 to be terrorists so buy you can't
you can't buy a beer Alan you can't buy
a beer in many American states if you're
under 21 so the definition of what is a
child I
mean but a 19-year-old is not a child a
19-year-old with a gun pointed at an
Israeli who was shot is not a child a
woman who was throwing a bomb at
Israelis is not a child remember too
that my dear friend Cornell also said
that the terrorism by Israel started in
1948 in 1948 Israel was prepared to
accept the two-state solution in a tiny
little State and they were attacked by
all the Arab armies and they fought in
self-defense but Cornell West revealed
his bias against Israel by suggesting
that Israel's terrorism began when it
fought for its own independence and
essentially he's calling for the end of
Israel if he's saying that its