‘Cows coming home!’: Mary Trump says ‘unprepared’ Donald is ‘short circuiting’ in court

16 Apr 202409:30


TLDRThe transcript discusses the impact of a judge's strict instructions on Donald Trump, who is accustomed to controlling narratives. The judge warns Trump of the consequences of disrupting court proceedings, including exclusion and potential jail time. The conversation explores Trump's psychological response to the loss of control in a criminal trial setting, which is a novel experience for him. The participants debate the absence of cameras in the courtroom, with some arguing it prevents Trump from spinning the narrative to his advantage, while others suggest it's a disservice to the public, who have a right to witness the judicial process. The summary highlights the unique challenges Trump faces in a formal trial environment and the broader implications for transparency in the American legal system.


  • 📜 The transcript discusses Mary Trump's relationship with her uncle, Donald Trump, and the implications of a judge's instructions to him regarding courtroom behavior.
  • 👨‍⚖️ Donald Trump is informed by a judge that he must be present at his trial, cannot disrupt proceedings, and faces potential jail time for misconduct.
  • 🚫 The judge warns Trump that failure to appear in court will result in an arrest warrant, highlighting the seriousness of the situation.
  • 🤔 Mary Trump is asked to comment on how her uncle might be processing these strict instructions and the limitations they impose on his usual activities.
  • 💭 It is suggested that Trump is unaccustomed to not controlling the narrative or proceedings, which could lead to a significant psychological impact.
  • 🧵 The discussion touches on Trump's history of fundraising off perceived grievances and how this situation might be used similarly.
  • 🚷 The standard operating procedure of a 'parking warning' in criminal courtrooms is emphasized, indicating Trump is not being treated differently from other defendants.
  • 📺 There is a debate about the absence of cameras in the courtroom, with arguments presented for both transparency and the potential for Trump to exploit the situation.
  • 😴 A New York Times reporter noted that Trump fell asleep during the trial, which could be due to exhaustion from tweeting or psychological stress.
  • 🤔 The lack of visual and audio access to the trial is considered a disservice to the public, who have a right to witness the judicial process.
  • 👥 The conversation includes speculation on how Trump's behavior in the controlled environment of a courtroom might be perceived by those not typically part of his base.
  • ⚖️ The importance of the American public seeing the judicial process at work is underscored, especially given the significance of the trial.

Q & A

  • What is a 'parking warning' in the context of a criminal trial?

    -A 'parking warning' is a standard operating procedure in criminal trials where the defendant is informed of their rights and the consequences of disrupting court proceedings, which may include exclusion from the courtroom and potential jail time.

  • How might Donald Trump's reaction to the 'parking warning' be different from other defendants due to his personality?

    -Donald Trump, having been used to controlling narratives and proceedings, might find it challenging to adapt to a situation where he has limited control. His personality, which includes a need for control and a history of reacting strongly when feeling cornered, could make it difficult for him to comply with the court's instructions.

  • Why might the absence of cameras in the courtroom be considered a 'travesty'?

    -The absence of cameras in the courtroom could be seen as a 'travesty' because it prevents the public from witnessing the judicial process unfold in real-time. This is particularly significant given the high-profile nature of the case and the public interest in seeing justice served transparently.

  • What could be some potential negative effects of having cameras in the courtroom for Donald Trump?

    -Having cameras in the courtroom could provide Donald Trump with additional ammunition to fundraise and rally his base. It might also allow him to control the narrative outside the courtroom by spinning the events to his advantage.

  • How might the presence of cameras affect the public's perception of Donald Trump during the trial?

    -The presence of cameras could reveal aspects of Trump's behavior that typically play well with his base but may not resonate as positively with a broader audience. His lack of impulse control and focus could be perceived negatively in the strict setting of a courtroom.

  • Why did Donald Trump reportedly fall asleep during the trial, according to the New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman?

    -It is suggested that Donald Trump may have fallen asleep due to being tired from being up all night tweeting, but it could also be attributed to the psychological stress and trauma he is experiencing as a result of the situation he finds himself in.

  • What is the significance of this trial in American history?

    -This trial is significant as it involves a former president who is seeking to return to the White House, making it one of the most important trials in American history. It highlights the judicial process and the accountability of even the highest officeholders.

  • Why might Donald Trump's campaign activities be affected by the trial?

    -The trial could affect Trump's campaign activities because he would be required to attend court on specific days, potentially limiting his ability to participate in campaign events, rallies, or other political engagements.

  • What is the general consensus on the importance of transparency in the judicial process?

    -The general consensus is that transparency in the judicial process is crucial. It allows the public to see the justice system at work and ensures that the proceedings are fair and open, which is particularly important in high-profile cases.

  • How might the lack of live audio or video from the courtroom impact the public's understanding of the trial?

    -The lack of live audio or video could limit the public's ability to fully understand the nuances of the trial, including the judge's instructions, the defendant's reactions, and the overall atmosphere of the proceedings. It may also reduce the public's trust in the process if they cannot directly observe it.

  • What is the role of social media, such as live tweeting, in providing updates on the trial?

    -Social media, including live tweeting, serves as a way to provide real-time updates and commentary on the trial. It helps to fill the gap left by the absence of cameras in the courtroom, offering a play-by-play account of the events as they unfold.

  • Why might Donald Trump's behavior in the courtroom be different from his typical public persona?

    -In the courtroom, Donald Trump would be subject to the rules and decorum of the judicial process, which could restrict his typical behavior. He would not be able to control the narrative as he does at rallies or press conferences, potentially revealing a different side of his personality to the public.



🏛️ Donald Trump's Courtroom Dynamics and Psychological Impact

The first paragraph discusses the impact of a judge's restrictions on Donald Trump's behavior during a criminal trial. It highlights Trump's unfamiliarity with not controlling the narrative or proceedings and suggests that this lack of control is causing him significant psychological stress. The discussion also touches on Trump's potential reaction to the situation, including his inability to campaign or engage in his typical behaviors while subject to the court's authority. The paragraph notes the absence of cameras in the courtroom, which prevents the public from witnessing Trump's conduct during the trial, and the reliance on live tweets for information. It concludes by considering whether the lack of visual access to the trial may inadvertently benefit Trump by allowing him to control the narrative post-trial.


📹 The Debate Over Cameras in the Courtroom

The second paragraph delves into the debate surrounding the presence of cameras in the courtroom during Trump's trial. It contrasts opinions about the potential benefits and drawbacks of having cameras, which would provide a transparent view of the judicial process but could also provide Trump with additional opportunities to fundraise and appeal to his base. The paragraph emphasizes the unique nature of Trump's trial, being a high-profile case with significant historical implications. It also discusses the importance of the public's ability to observe the judicial process, suggesting that the absence of cameras and audio is a disservice to the American people. The conversation concludes with the assertion that regardless of the outcome of the trial, the lack of public visibility into the courtroom proceedings is a loss for transparency and public trust.



💡Donald Trump

Donald Trump is a former President of the United States and a central figure in the transcript. He is mentioned in the context of a criminal case and a judge's instructions regarding his conduct in court. His personality and behavior are discussed in the context of the trial and its implications for his public image.


A judge is a public official appointed to decide cases in a court of law. In the transcript, the judge is instructing Donald Trump about courtroom conduct and the consequences of disrupting proceedings, highlighting the formal and authoritative role of a judge in a criminal trial.

💡Criminal Case

A criminal case involves a person accused of committing a crime under the law. The transcript discusses Donald Trump's involvement in a criminal case and the potential impact on his behavior and public perception, emphasizing the serious nature of the legal proceedings.

💡Courtroom Conduct

Courtroom conduct refers to the expected behavior of individuals within a court of law. The transcript includes a judge's warning to Donald Trump about the consequences of disrupting the proceedings, illustrating the importance of decorum and respect within a legal setting.

💡Arrest Warrant

An arrest warrant is a legal document issued by a court that authorizes police to arrest an individual. In the transcript, the judge informs Donald Trump that failing to appear in court will result in an arrest warrant, demonstrating the binding nature of court orders and the consequences of non-compliance.



Campaigning refers to the activities undertaken by individuals or groups to promote a particular political agenda or candidate. The transcript suggests that Donald Trump's involvement in a criminal trial may limit his ability to campaign, indicating how legal issues can affect political activities.

💡Gag Order

A gag order is a legal restraint that prevents certain information from being publicly disclosed. The transcript mentions a future gag order violation hearing, which implies restrictions on what can be said publicly about the case, highlighting the legal mechanisms that can control the flow of information in a trial.

💡Psychological Trauma

Psychological trauma refers to the emotional and mental stress resulting from a distressing event. The transcript discusses the potential psychological impact of the trial on Donald Trump, suggesting that the experience may be causing him significant stress and discomfort.


Narcissism is a personality trait characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance and a need for admiration. The transcript uses the term to describe Donald Trump's alleged reaction to the trial, suggesting that his personality may be influencing his response to the legal proceedings.


Livestreaming is the act of broadcasting live content over the internet. The transcript discusses the lack of live audio or video from the courtroom, which is a point of contention among the speakers. They argue that livestreaming could provide the public with a more transparent view of the trial.

💡Judicial Process

The judicial process refers to the procedures and practices involved in the administration of justice in a court of law. The transcript emphasizes the importance of the judicial process and the public's respect for it, particularly in the context of a high-profile trial involving a former president.


Mary Trump discusses her uncle Donald Trump's relationship and his current legal situation.

A parker warning is issued to Donald Trump, outlining the rules of conduct during his trial.

Trump is informed he could be excluded from the courtroom and face jail time if he disrupts the proceedings.

Mary Trump comments on the psychological impact of the trial on Donald Trump, noting his lack of control over the situation.

The discussion suggests that Trump is likely to raise funds off the trial, positioning himself as an aggrieved party.

Mary Trump explains that this is a rare situation where Trump does not control the narrative or proceedings.

The transcript mentions Trump's past behavior and how it contrasts with the strict conduct required in a criminal courtroom.

Concerns are raised about the lack of cameras in the courtroom, which prevents the public from seeing the judicial process.

Mary Trump speculates on Trump's unpreparedness for the trial and his potential inability to manage the situation well.

The psychological trauma and narcissistic injury Trump might be experiencing due to the trial are discussed.

A New York Times reporter's observation that Trump fell asleep during the trial is mentioned, possibly due to stress or exhaustion.

The absence of cameras in the courtroom is debated, with arguments for and against their presence.

The potential benefit for Trump to control the narrative outside the courtroom is discussed.

Concern is expressed that cameras could provide Trump with more ammunition to rally his base.

The importance of transparency in the judicial process and the public's right to see it is emphasized.

The discussion highlights the significance of the trial in American history, being one of the most significant.

Mary Trump predicts that Trump's lack of impulse control and focus will not play well with the public in a strict courtroom setting.

The transcript concludes with a call for transparency and the public's right to witness the judicial process in action.



marry again thanks for joining us mary i know that


one of the things are always asked is your relationship with


your uncle who is donald trump but i would to read something


specifically to you because i thought you'd be the best best


guess for this and that's going to be something called a


park are warning if we could bring that up on the screen


so the following went down with judge were shot down today with


donald trump or sen says you have the right to be present


during the trial and to assist your attorneys do you


understand trump says yes marshawn says if you disrupt


the proceedings you could be excluded from the courtroom and


committed to jail based on your conduct and the trial will


continue on in your absence do you understand trump


answers yes excuse me i do marshawn then says if you


do not show up there will be an arrest do you understand


trump's as i do mary trump mehring himself now


pun totally intended to a criminal case and a criminal


courtroom but mary the question i have for you is how


it is going down in donald trump's head the fact that you


now have a judge telling him you can't be anywhere but


court monday tuesday thursday friday he can't come


in or out until the judge lets him do it it's a mother


may i experience for him right


can't campaign can't be doing this and and he's


looking at a future


gag order violation hearing that we're going to get into a


little bit later with our legal voices let me talk about what


this is doing to donald trump just after how many hours


seven hours yeah it yeah and and you can go to oral


arguments in front supreme court i that's right yeah


before i answer that excellent question i just want to as as


the lay person in the group just let everybody you guys


those much better than i but it's really important to


point out that


parking warning is it's it's ten or so the donald trump is


already going to be raising money off of this has the


aggrieved party as if this is just been created to punish him


and treated differently from other criminal defendant


so i think it's always important to remind people that


this is standard operating procedure


he just the reason it doesn't feel like that to him is


because when it is life has she ever been in a situation in


which he does not control either the narrative or the


proceedings this is rare and this is i would suggest


since this is a criminal trial the most serious case in which


he is had virtually no control over anything that happens


inside that courtroom and indeed over anything that


happens to him if you stepped outside of the lines that


judgment on headset so he is quite honestly i know we said


this many times and it's been sure many times


he's freaks out when he feels like the walls are closing and


he freaks out and and access when he feels more did because


he so rarely ever has been i mean we're looking at a very


old and fairly complex psychology that goes back to


his childhood so for for the cows finally be coming home


when he's in his late seventies it's something that


he is not going to be able to manage well i think it's it's


a travesty as you said katie and joyce that there are no


cameras in the courtroom that there's no a live audio of


what's happening in this courtroom thankfully there


are live streamed live tweets so we can get sort of a play by




it's very different to be able to see the facial expressions


and the body language and i think we just need to when we


do get have the benefit of of the live tweeting and the


commentary that's going to be coming up later we see


though in some of the other guests to to take a step back


and realize that this is a unique situation and all fronts


life he is totally unprepared for it he never believed it


would come to this


there's a reason he tried to get this case the laid up


until the eleventh hour so he's not fairing well


the fact that he fell asleep


with according to new york times reporter maggie haberman


and there's no reason to doubt her is it because he was just


tired although that probably true because he was up all


night tweeting but it's also because of the this


psychological trauma he's experiencing the narcissistic


with that he's suffering right now is basically shorts are


getting him


so we we don't know if he was asleep he could have


contemplating beings


could have been that is he so coming up with a generally


speaking his contemplative i think it's an adjective for


him but were your view a sleeping although there there


were a few moments right when his eyes are closed but


you know mary i wanted to stick with this idea of the no


cameras because i've been reading different schools of




i'm really good arguments of both sides some people think


it's a travesty i think the three of us would agree that


there's no cameras no idea why because i would love to


see the park or warrants being issued to donald trump as you


said and as joyce agrees we all agree parker morning is a


normal experience in a criminal courtroom all criminal


defendants are advised of a park are warning


but at this on that but on the flip side some people said


mary it would just help him because the narrative that he


does try to control is when he gets out of the courtroom


he likes to do the spin and so maybe it would be good


to see him being berated by the judge are being read as parker


warning the one that we're seeing on the full screen right


now so mary i mean i guess it is there any merit to the


idea that actually having cameras or video or audio


excuse me coming out of the courtroom would be a bad idea


for somebody like donald trump isn't just going to give more


ammunition to fundraise


listen to his base is his base they're not listening to


us they're not they're not listening to anybody is going


to contradict don't drop so


i guess that's true for that but we're talking about the


most sick significant trial at least one of them in


american history when a lot


yeah the the first formal trial of a somebody who was in


the white house and


wants to be in the white house again so you're going we're


going to have a much wider audience than we might


otherwise of and i think


the reason one of the main reasons like just a grey is


with the the assessment that it will help him is because we're


going to be seeing donald trump again in it in a unique


context usually at a rally or at a press conference he is


controlling the room he is controlling the narrative and


any gaffes or ramblings can be put down to he's riffing


he's i don't know doing improv you know it's always


explained away in this situation when he can't do


that he can't speak out of turn he needs permission and


we're going to see certain traits that seemed to play well


with people his his focus sluggishness that's part of


sec his lack of impulse control right and we're going


to see them


in a a very


strict setting that is you know what the american people


a good have a lot of respect for the judicial process


you know jurors it just in case there's any doubt in


anybody's mind jurors take their jobs very seriously


and people watching trials take them very seriously especially


if there's a judge in there who has a very for hand so we're


going to see donald


thinking that he's being tough and just looking in that short


and looking like he just cannot control himself


it's not going to play well with the people who don't go to


his rallies to the people who don't tune in all the time


who were kind of seeing this for the first time and i think


again not having cameras and audio quite honestly


regardless of how it plays outside of the courtroom is a


disservice to the american people we don't make these


decisions based on who it benefits or not it benefits


the american people to be able to see the wheels of justice


turning which by the way we've been denied for very


very long time