The Faulkner Focus 5/28/24 FULL END SHOW | BREAKING NEWS TODAY May 28, 2024
Summary
TLDR在这段视频脚本中,讨论了美国前总统特朗普在纽约的刑事审判,以及政治界对此案件的反应。辩护律师托德·布兰奇强调了特朗普的无辜,批评了检察官依赖迈克尔·科恩的证词,科恩是特朗普的前律师,也是一名被定罪的说谎者。同时,提到了拜登竞选团队如何利用这个审判来攻击特朗普,强调他对美国民主的威胁。此外,还提到了特朗普的儿子亨特·拜登即将面临的枪支和税务指控的审判。整个讨论集中在案件的政治影响和法律细节上,暗示了审判结果可能对即将到来的总统选举产生影响。
Takeaways
- 🗣️ 该视频剧本讨论了前总统唐纳德·特朗普在纽约的刑事审判,以及与此相关的政治和社会反响。
- 📢 特朗普的辩护律师托德·布兰奇(Tod Blanche)在结案陈词中强调,曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格(Alvin Bragg)没有充分证据,认为这是一个不应该发生的审判。
- 🎥 法庭外,支持特朗普的人士和拜登竞选团队的成员,包括演员罗伯特·戴罗(Robert Dairo),都表达了各自对审判的看法。
- 📊 讨论了陪审团可能的五种裁决结果:全部有罪、部分有罪、全部无罪、僵局陪审团或法官裁决。
- 👤 迈克尔·科恩(Michael Cohen)作为此案的关键证人,他的可信度受到辩护方的质疑,他曾是特朗普的律师,但后来因作伪证而被定罪。
- 🤔 法庭辩论中提到了其他未被召唤的证人,包括艾伦·魏塞尔伯格(Allen Weisselberg),他可能对案件有重要影响,但没有被检方召唤出庭。
- 📚 法律专家乔纳森·特利(Jonathan Turley)认为,针对特朗普的案件因缺乏证据或明确罪行而应该被判无罪。
- 🏛️ 讨论了白宫和拜登总统可能对审判结果的反应,预计拜登将在白宫就此案发表讲话。
- 👨👦 还提到了总统拜登的儿子亨特·拜登(Hunter Biden)即将面临的两项审判,涉及枪支和税务指控。
- 🔍 剧本中还涉及了对特朗普的政治攻击,包括提及1月6日国会山事件,以及对美国民主的所谓威胁。
Q & A
特朗普的辩护团队在纽约刑事审判中的主要论点是什么?
-特朗普的辩护团队主要论点是曼哈顿地区检察官Alan Bragg没有足够的证据,认为这是一个不应该发生的审判,是出于政治动机的迫害,特朗普本人对支付给Stormy Daniels的款项并不知情,且与所谓的计划无关。
为什么辩护律师Tod Blanche强调迈克尔·科恩(Michael Cohen)的可信度问题?
-Tod Blanche强调迈克尔·科恩的可信度问题,因为科恩是此案中唯一的关键证人,但他过去有在法庭上撒谎的历史,辩护团队试图说服陪审团不应相信科恩的证词。
在审判中,有哪些证人对特朗普的案件有重要影响?
-审判中有多位证人出现,包括小报出版商David Pecker,性工作者Stormy Daniels,以及迈克尔·科恩的前法律顾问Robert Costello等,但他们的证词与案件的实际指控关系不大。
为什么说迈克尔·科恩是此案中唯一的关键证人?
-迈克尔·科恩是特朗普的前律师,他直接涉及到了案件中的支付问题,并且是控方试图证明特朗普有罪的主要证人。尽管他的可信度受到质疑,但他是控方构建案件的核心。
为什么辩护团队认为特朗普不应该为迈克尔·科恩的行为负责?
-辩护团队认为特朗普没有参与准备文件、发票和支票的工作,他只是认为他在为迈克尔·科恩的法律服务支付合理的费用,因此不应该为科恩的行为负责。
特朗普本人对于这次审判的态度是怎样的?
-特朗普本人对这次审判持批评态度,他认为这是一个'危险的一天'和'悲哀的一天',认为这是一个被操纵的法庭案件,不应该在总统选举期间进行。
为什么说这次审判对美国来说是一个危险的日子?
-这次审判被认为是对美国法治和公正的考验,特朗普的支持者可能认为这是政治迫害,而反对者可能认为这是追求正义的必要步骤,因此它可能加剧社会分裂和政治对立。
为什么说这次审判与政治有关?
-这次审判与政治有关,因为它发生在总统选举的背景下,而且涉及到的是美国前总统特朗普。此外,白宫已经表示,无论判决结果如何,拜登总统都将在白宫就此案件发表讲话。
为什么拜登总统选择在白宫而不是在竞选活动中就特朗普的案件发表讲话?
-拜登总统选择在白宫发表讲话可能是为了避免给人留下政治宣传的印象,试图显示出对司法程序的尊重,并将讲话定位为总统的官方立场。
为什么说这次审判是曼哈顿地区检察官Alan Bragg的一个风险?
-这次审判是Alan Bragg的风险,因为他在许多其他人(包括联邦调查局)放弃追究之后,仍然决定提起诉讼。如果审判结果对特朗普有利,可能会对Bragg的职业声誉和未来的政治生涯造成影响。
Outlines
📢 特朗普纽约刑事审判:辩护方结案陈词
特朗普的辩护律师托德·布兰奇在纽约刑事审判中进行结案陈词,强调特朗普与案件中涉及的文件、发票和支票准备无关,认为曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格没有提出足够的证据。布兰奇还指出,特朗普的前律师迈克尔·科恩作为检方的关键证人,其可信度受到质疑,因为科恩曾被定罪为骗子,并且在法庭上多次撒谎。特朗普在审判前表示,这个案子本应在七年前提出,而不是在他的总统选举期间,他认为这是一个被操纵的法庭案件。
🗣️ 法律专家分析:特朗普案件应判无罪
宪法律师和福克斯新闻撰稿人乔纳森·特利认为,针对特朗普的案件缺乏证据,应该被驳回。他指出,案件主要依赖于迈克尔·科恩的证词,而科恩是唯一的证人,且未能确立犯罪行为的发生。特利还提到,案件似乎是出于政治动机,旨在阻止特朗普,而不是基于法律事实。此外,他提到了罗伯特·戴罗的言论,暗示这起案件是关于特朗普对美国的破坏,而非实际的罪行。
🤔 陪审团裁决的五种可能及其政治影响
随着特朗普案件的审判接近尾声,讨论了陪审团可能的五种裁决结果:全部有罪、部分有罪、全部无罪、僵局陪审团或法官的裁决。分析了每种结果对政治的影响,包括特朗普如果被判有罪或无罪可能对即将到来的总统选举产生的影响。同时,提到了拜登竞选团队如何利用这个案件来攻击特朗普,以及他们如何将焦点放在特朗普对美国民主的威胁上。
👥 法庭内外:特朗普支持者与反对者的对峙
法庭外,特朗普的支持者和反对者发生了对峙。特朗普的支持者在公园集会,而拜登竞选团队的支持者,包括演员罗伯特·戴罗,举行了新闻发布会。戴罗在讲话中提到特朗普想要破坏美国,而特朗普的支持者则回应表示他们爱特朗普和他们的国家。法庭内,特朗普的辩护团队继续他们的结案陈词,强调特朗普的无辜,并试图削弱科恩证词的可信度。
📚 法律分析:为何特朗普案应判无罪
法律专家和前检察官特雷·高蒂和李·泽尔登讨论了为何特朗普案件应该判决无罪。他们指出,科恩作为唯一的关键证人,其证词不足以证明特朗普的罪行。高蒂提到,科恩曾表示他在为特朗普提供法律服务时,特朗普并未参与任何不当行为。泽尔登则强调,科恩的可信度问题以及他作为被定罪的伪证者的历史,使得他的证词不足以构成有罪判决的基础。
🎙️ 政治评论:拜登对特朗普案件的沉默即将打破
据报道,一旦特朗普案件的裁决结果出炉,美国总统拜登将打破沉默,从白宫而非竞选集会上发表讲话。分析人士认为,这表明拜登将此案视为其竞选活动的一部分,旨在强调特朗普对美国民主的威胁。同时,拜登的竞选团队正在利用1月6日的国会山事件来警告选民,如果特朗普再次当选,他可能不会和平离开白宫。
🎶 音乐插曲
在视频脚本中,有一个段落包含了音乐元素,但没有提供具体的内容或对话。因此,这部分可能是视频节目中的过渡或间隔部分,用以调整节目节奏或为接下来的内容提供背景音乐。
📞 特朗普另一法律案件:联邦层面的诉讼
在特朗普纽约刑事审判的同时,还有另一起涉及特朗普的联邦法律案件正在进展中。这部分内容在脚本中并未详细说明,但从上下文中可以推测,这可能与特朗普的政治活动或其商业行为有关,且可能对他的法律地位产生影响。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡特朗普
💡刑事审判
💡封口费
💡迈克尔·科恩
💡Stormy Daniels
💡政治
💡白宫
💡证人
💡辩护
💡审判结果
Highlights
特朗普的辩护律师托德·布兰奇(Tod Blanche)在纽约刑事审判的结案陈词中表示,曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格(Alvin Bragg)没有案件,这是一场不应该发生的审判。
特朗普前私人律师迈克尔·科恩(Michael Cohen)被辩护方描述为唯一证人,且其可信度受到质疑。
特朗普本人在庭审前表示,该案件应在七年前提出,而不是在他的总统选举期间,认为这是一个被操纵的法庭案件。
陪审团可能的裁决包括特朗普在所有指控上均被判有罪、部分有罪、完全无罪,或者可能出现僵局陪审团或法官裁决。
法庭外,特朗普的支持者和拜登竞选团队的成员,包括演员罗伯特·戴罗(Robert Dairo),发生了对峙。
福克斯新闻撰稿人乔纳森·特利(Jonathan Turley)认为,针对特朗普的案件因缺乏证据或可认定的罪行而应被驳回。
特朗普的辩护律师强调,特朗普与准备文件、发票和支票无关,他认为自己正在为迈克尔·科恩的法律服务支付费用。
法庭上播放了特朗普前白宫通讯主管霍普·希克斯(Hope Hicks)的证词,她表示特朗普不希望他的家人因与Stormy Daniels的事件而受到伤害或尴尬。
法庭外,特朗普的支持者和反对者之间的紧张气氛加剧,双方都表达了对审判结果的期待和担忧。
拜登竞选团队计划在审判结果出炉后,从白宫发表声明,而不是在竞选活动中,以显示对司法程序的尊重。
特朗普的辩护律师指出,迈克尔·科恩在录音中提到现金,但录音被剪辑,没有特朗普谈论有关150,000美元的证据。
法庭辩论中,辩护方强调科恩作为律师,持续为特朗普提供法律服务,尽管他支付了款项并被辩护方描述为“惯犯骗子”。
法庭辩论中,辩护方指出科恩在作证时承认了他在为特朗普提供法律服务的同时,也在进行其他活动。
特朗普的辩护律师强调,案件与Stormy Daniels或其周围的故事无关,而是关于文件,特朗普与所谓的计划无关。
法庭辩论中,辩护方指出,科恩在法庭上的故事不真实,他在过去曾在宣誓下撒谎。
法庭辩论中,辩护方强调,科恩曾承认自己是骗子,这一点在法庭上被辩护方重复强调。
拜登竞选团队利用审判作为攻击特朗普的手段,警告如果特朗普当选,他可能永远不会离开白宫。
特朗普的辩护律师在结案陈词中指出,科恩是唯一声称特朗普知道付款的人,而你不能相信他的话。
特朗普的辩护律师强调,科恩在录音中被剪辑的部分显示他在撒谎,没有特朗普讨论有关150,000美元的证据。
Transcripts
at uh January 6 and that some of them
hadn't told the truth and so on and so
forth Dao of course dropping his usual
bad language sorry about that um but in
the meantime Jason Miller comes out and
he answers back to that this is the
first time that Republicans have been
challenged at all outside the courthouse
supporting Donald Trump the former
president inside has had guests inside
also with him lawmakers of we've seen
over the last couple of weeks however
outside has been kind of a more steady
drum beat for him you've had people GA
to watch that media from all over the
world as you might imagine today is the
first day that the Biden campaign has
decided that maybe they want to share
some of that Limelight uh so they've
stepped in and of course we heard from
the uh the White House today that at
some point after the verdict probably
rather immediately you'll hear not the
president take a stage that would be you
know more political cuz who doesn't
think this is about politics I I don't
know where that one person is but anyway
so it won't be on like a stage somewhere
at a campaign event that he'll speak
he'll speak to the ation from the White
House about this case when the verdict
comes down politics are looming large
looming large you see it right now let's
go to the courtroom and what's happening
in that historic Showdown former
president Trump's defense is giving its
closing arguments in his New York
criminal trial and then it will be the
prosecution's turn and we've been
following this together for weeks now
minute-by-minute coverage reminder on
the right side of your screen is from
our team inside the courtroom in the
Overflow room giving us an everyday Tik
Tok of what's going on so you can check
that moment by moment we'll also have
everything that's going on in analysis
right here live you are in the fauler
focus I'm Harris fauler arguments are
hours long they are a recap by both the
defense in the prosecution today a recap
of their key points from The Trial what
each side wants to put at the top of a
juror's mind before that person begins
deliberating in that group of jurors of
12 22 Witnesses have taken the stand in
the trial and they include David pecker
the Tabloid publisher who testified he
bought and buried negative stories about
a lot of celebrities not just the former
president Donald Trump stormmy Daniels
the sex film worker at the center of the
case gave well she's a sex film worker
so the details were graphic who didn't
see that coming I bet the prosecution
did anyway what they didn't Bank on was
how unrelated they were going to be
taken to the actual charges in question
she talked about a lot just didn't have
anything to do with this case Michael
con the former attorney and so-called
fixer convicted liar and prisoned for it
whose credibility has been hit over and
over again by the defense Robert
Costello a former legal advisor to
Michael Cohen who says Michael Cohen is
a liar was a liar then and is a liar now
that's a lot of lying but he's on the
stand as a star witness for the
prosecution at least he was here's the
former president before the start of the
arguments today
they should have brought this case seven
years ago not in the middle of my
presidential election we have a rigged
court case that should have never been
brought and it should have been brought
in another jurisdiction this is a very
dangerous day for America it's a very
Saad day thank you are you worried about
a
conviction so five ways this could go
take a look at your screen if you're not
directly in front of your phone or
device or TV or whatever you're watching
on jurors could find Trump guilty on all
counts jurors could find Trump Trump
guilty on some counts jurors could
acquit him of all charges it could also
potentially end in a hung jury or a
fifth less likely outcome a bench ruling
with no jury involved so that would just
be the judge the New York Post cover
with a dig at the Manhattan district
attorney who brought this case after
many people including the feds had
already passed on trying to have this
adjudicated look at it nothing to brag
about notice that you just like Alvin
Bragg the da who brought the case spells
his last name constitutional law
attorney and Fox News contributor
Jonathan Turley is standing by first to
senior correspondent Eric Shawn to catch
us up on what already has happened in
the courthouse
Eric well lot happening outside the
courthouse as far as inside the
courthouse right now it is the case put
put forward for former president Trump
by his defense attorney Tod blanch and
Mr blanch is echoing exactly what his
client said this morning or arrived here
in court and that is that Manhattan
district attorney Alan brag has no
case everybody says this is crazy this
is not a trial that should happen it's a
it's a very sad day this is a dark day
in America we have a rigged court case
that should have never been
brought in aimation of the jury Bland
said that Trump had nothing to do with
preparing the paperwork invoices and
checks and that he did think he was
properly paying Michael Cohen for his
Legal Services Bland said quote
president Trump is innocent he did not
commit any crimes the district attorney
did not meet the burden of proof period
blance told the jury that the case is
not about Stormy Daniels or the
salacious story surrounding her but
about the documents and that Trump had
nothing to do with the alleged scheme he
noted that Michael Cohen a repeated liar
continued to render legal services for
the former president when he was paying
him and told everybody who was Trump's
personal attorney and of course blanch
brought up that Cohen is an admitted
serial liar who has lied under oath in
the past and cannot be believed he said
quote Cohen lied to you he lied to you
the story Mr Cohen told on the witness
stand is not true then prosecutors will
have the last word in his closing it is
expected that Assistant Attorney Joshua
steinglass will lay out the evidence
against Trump and he will claim that
Michael Cohen did tell the truth and his
claims are corroborated ated by other
Witnesses and the documents and Harris
as you noted there's a lot of activity
outside Pro Trump supporters here in the
park and we heard that uh Biden campaign
supported a news conference by some
supporters including actor Robert dairo
here's part of what daero just
said I love this
city I love this city I don't want to
destroy it Donald Trump wants to destroy
not only the city but the country and
eventually he could destroy the
world well as he was speaking you could
hear their prot Trump supporters are
yelling at him saying we love Trump we
love our country uh saying that merchan
a judge merchan Juan mchan should be uh
uh uh actually thrown into jail
according to one so that's a bit of the
atmosphere out here well inside the uh
summations are continuing we expect them
to continue through at least lunch the
jury likely getting this case finally
tomorrow then we will all wait to see
what happens Harris back to you oh we
are perched and ready great job Eric
Sean always thank you Jonathan turley's
new opinion piece here's why the case
against Trump should end in not guilty a
quote from that piece this case should
have been Mis dismissed for a lack of
evidence or cognizable crime the jury
will be reminded that the burden is on
the government not the defense end of
quote there and here's at the White
House today
in focus with me now great to have you
Jonathan Turley has stepped away for
just a second so talk to me if you would
about the case for Donald Trump and why
this all just needs to be found not
guilty well I think that this case uh
really never re really amounted to much
other than Michael Cohen which is
surprised many of us we thought that
Bragg was holding more evidence and more
witnesses otherwise no one would go
forward with this in fact Bragg himself
said that there was no way he would
bring a case that would call Michael
Cohen on the stand well he ended up
putting on a case that was entirely
Michael Cohen literally he's the only
witness that has addressed the elements
of the crime and even he wasn't able to
establish that they occurred and so what
we're really looking at now is really
what Robert daero said you know I I
would love to replay it because what
Robert daero said was this is all about
Trump destroying America it was no
reference to the actual crimes this this
case was a vehicle to stop Trump in his
View and he says that out in front of
the courthouse it was a telling moment
because I think that brag really hopes
that the jury won't look beyond the
identity of the defendant that's the
reason I think the defense has to be
very honest and very open with this jury
and to tell them look we know that some
of you don't like the defendant the
question is whether that's enough for
you or whether you believe that no one
in New York should be convicted without
a cognizable crime or evidence because
this case has neither um Jonathan I want
to hit this with you because you you you
brought up who we did see you know the
one witness that you say actually did at
least talk about what was happening in
the case he even during that questioning
though it was never made clear what the
underlying crime was and all of this so
there you have your star witness but the
other person who didn't testify was
someone who the New York Times has
written about the star witness who never
testified at Trump's trial is is the
headline for them and they say that
there was a third person in the room in
terms of when a check or several checks
would have been signed and that would be
uh Alan we
weiselberg and and the prosecution
didn't call him to testify although he
knows the truth this is according to the
New York Times he has not told it ever
he is serving time in Riker's Island we
know that after pleading guilty to a
perjury in an unrelated civil case
involving Trump so I I want to ask you
what could weiselberg have brought this
case and is that a Miss for the defense
too they could have called
him quite frankly I don't think it is a
Miss for the defense uh for a couple of
reasons first of all as I said in that
New York Post piece the absence of
weiselberg has got to be hit by the uh
defense in its closing argument there's
only one reason why the government would
not call Wis ber and that's that
weiselberg would contradict Cohen why
else would you put a Serial purger on
the stand but not the guy that he keeps
on referencing it was an agreement
between Cohen and weiselberg that
defined this as a retainer and yet they
didn't call that other half of the
agreement for the defense there's
reasons why they didn't call him because
weiselberg could have been just as they
saw with Castello used to bring in a
whole bunch of other areas uh that they
could control also for weiselberg this
is a prosecution that has repeatedly
threatened him to prosecute him again so
he won't be eager to cross the
prosecutors and look at another stint at
Rikers yeah well and what you're saying
is they probably wouldn't have cut him
uh you know a sweetheart deal as we've
seen with some uh Jonathan turle thank
you so very much for getting us kicked
off here with what's going on from your
legal perspective all that experience we
appreciate it thank you Harris well we
are following closing arguments minute
by minute again the right box on your
screen uh we'll have an update that you
can just check on the screen real
quickly and of course all the coverage
all the analysis a former president of
the United States now en closing
arguments the prosecution as you heard
from Jonathan Turley what will they work
with a lying star witness a Fox News
Alert as we are waiting inside the
courtroom right now are the closing
arguments that began about 2 hours well
about 90 minutes or so they're expected
to go all day long the defense goes
first first in this New York trial and
president Trump's defense uh delivering
that now Trey gouty former Federal
prosecutor former South Carolina
congressman and host of Sunday night in
America right here on fnc Leo Terell
also a Fox News contributor and Lee
zeldon former Republican Congressman of
New York a legal surrogate to former
president Trump great to see all of you
um Trey I'm going to start with you and
and the idea that Michael Cohen is the
star Witness I want to play something
and then have you talk out of it this is
Michael Cohen's former attorney Bob
Costello who testified at the trial we
know uh he told Fox that Cohen's
statements changed on the payment to
Stormy Daniels that's what this case is
supposed to be about that payment that
hush money as it's been called let's
watch what Bob cast or rather yeah Bob
Costello and see what he
said he kept on saying I have nothing on
Donald Trump and then when we got into
the discussion of the Stormy Daniels NDA
he said specifically and I
cross-examined him on this this was my
idea it was his idea to take care of the
NDA because he had been contacted by a
lawyer for Stormy Daniels who said she
was going to claim that Donald Trump had
sex with her cooh said I didn't believe
the allegation but nevertheless it would
be embarrassing to Melania that's
Michael coh's
words Trey your
response yeah I was actually in the the
courtroom last week when Mr Costello
testified the words he used his
testimony could have been incredibly
helpful to the defense regrettably his
demeanor the manner in which he
testified was not uh you cannot get into
a fight with the judge the jury is going
to relate to the judge so at best I
thought his testimony was a wash and it
may have actually wound up hurting the
defense I will also say this I want to
say hello to my old colleague Lee zeldon
who's a former prosecutor look the
prosecution's going to stand up and say
Michael Costello is I mean Michael C is
not a great witness he he he he he's
convicted perjurer he doesn't like Trump
but guess what we didn't pick him Donald
Trump picked the witnesses I would have
preferred a Catholic none I would have
preferred a first grade school teacher
but that's not who Donald Trump used as
his lawyer that's not who he used to
engage in this Catan kill scheme so we
didn't pick Michael Cohen as a witness
Donald Trump did that is what the
prosecution's going to argue later this
afternoon so um Lee Eldon I didn't
realize you guys had known each other
from your prosecutorial days that's
great information when I interviewed uh
the former president at the White House
it was the day after Michael Cohen had
been um sentenced and that would have
been in December of 2018 when I sat down
with him I asked him why in the world
did you hire this guy and what he said
was he made a mistake that he never
should have hired Michael Cohen that was
was all those years ago and so when the
prosecution makes the argument well he
pick
them everybody has known that all the
way down in the last six years right and
look at where we are today yet Alvin
Bragg picks this case and picks that guy
to be the star witness they did in fact
do the
choosing yeah they really didn't have
anyone else to call to be able to give
this testimony in place of Michael Cohen
uh there was some conversation here
about the CFO weiselberg who the
prosecution decides not to call uh but
weiselberg is not going to testify what
Cohen was testifying to and there was no
other option so you put you put it all
on Michael Cohen to prove your entire
case and this is somebody who is a
convicted perjurer who has contradicted
himself with past statements that have
been made over the years uh now you're
in a situation where you're in court
you're giving closing arguments the
defense has to go first here in this new
york-based trial
and they still don't know what the
underlying charge is to elevate this
from misdemeanor to a felony we might
for the first time hear it during the
prosecution's closing argument but
that's the last word of the entire case
uh and the defense doesn't get an
opportunity to rebut it this is
something that should have been known
UPF front uh and here here we are uh at
this point giving closing arguments
they've entirely relied on this one
person uh and they should have passed on
his prosecution real quickly Le could
they have changed this around I mean I
know in New York and I mentioned that
the defense goes first or in New York I
get it but in a place where you don't
have the crime where you don't know what
that underlying second crime is could
the judge have made his own judgment in
this and said we're going to we're going
to flip-flop it because you've got to
know what to defend and so prosecution
you go first so we can be clear on what
all the crimes are and the jury can be
two and then defend you go second could
that have
happened well I I'll tell you first is
with the judge's Powers when the
prosecution rested the judge just issued
a directed verdict at that point the
judge still could order a directed
verdict at this point flipping the order
in as far as fundamental fairness the
burden is on the government and in this
case where you have to establish that
there's an underlying charge which they
still haven't indicated what it is in
all fairness they should have been
giving the defense an opportunity to
respond all right I I want get back to
and and go forward because Leo I feel
like the jurors may forget some of this
testimony uh and and I would imagine
this is where the defense will go why
would president Trump have not wanted
anybody to know that he had even met a
sex film worker named Stormy Daniels
let's watch hopix his former White House
comms director talk to that uh right
here's what she said in court of course
we can't show you the video cuz we
didn't have C cameras in court but we've
got what she said she said I don't think
he wanted anyone in his his family to be
hurt or embarrassed by what's happening
on the campaign president Trump really
values Mrs Trump's opinion and she
doesn't weigh in all the time but when
she does it's meaningful to him I think
he was just concerned about what her
perception of this would be I know that
was weighing on him
Leo hope hick Harris is a credible
witness she has no dog in the fight so
what she gave the Trump defense team
were
alternatives to the idea that Trump
alleged ually PID this money to hide a
or was a campaign violation she was
credible and that's why her testimony
should be played in hard by the def
defense team let me be very clear about
this the defense team is focusing on
Witnesses or jurors haris that are very
solidly in the Trump camp and I can
guarantee you that the defense team is
aware of the jurors who are in their
camp they're playing to the attorneys
they're play to the two attorneys who
are going to probably provide the
Insight on the information you know what
uh there is in fact a Daily Caller
article about that and it says the panel
of 12 jurors includes a young corporate
law attorney and a civil litigation
attorney and the headline uh was that
perhaps the brag team should worry that
having lawyers on the Trump jury could
lead to an acquittal your thoughts on
that
Leo oh there's no question about it
because I'll tell you right now now most
attorneys do not want attorneys in the
jury box but in this case we don't know
what the charges are when you have
credibility at issue Todd blanch is
playing to those two attorneys Harris
because he's hoping that they provide
the Insight that this trial judge did
not provide he's hoping that these two
attorneys provide just common sense
logic as far as the rule of law and what
facts were played as of right now we
have three attorneys here on your show
we don't know what the federal charges
are we don't know what facts actually
indicates a crime against Trump but yet
those two attorneys are critical to this
case that's fascinating and you only
need one Trey I've heard you say it so
many times Trey Lee and Leo thank you so
very much for joining me early I
appreciate you former president Trump's
legal team giving their closing
arguments right now and then the
prosecution will do the same thing we're
with you all day long here on Fox News
channel fnc for the cool kids stay here
arguments are underway right now in
former president Trump's new criminal
trial Politico is reporting that once
the verdict is in President Biden will
jump into the pool and actually break
his silence on the case and that he will
do so from the White House rather than
from a campaign stump now remember right
when we got this uh hour started I was
talking about how he would want to I
would imagine avoid the appearance of a
political statement um and so he'll do
this from the White House house but it's
political what's going on so I don't
know hatack anybody does that even come
into play Fox News contributor Charlie
hurt doesn't buy any of this
watch look at all of the big major
issues that Americans actually care
about that took uh Joe Biden a long time
to address it took him a long time to
address the attack in Israel the
terrorist attack in Israel it it has
taken him forever to address the crisis
at the border and I would argue he still
has never actually addressed it but even
before the verdict is read
he's announcing that he's going to
address this issue it's because this is
the issue that that Joe Biden is running
on I think it's going to fail I think
it's the whole thing is blown up in his
face well Donald Trump's trial is
wrapping up and the president's son
Hunter Biden will face two trials during
the campaign on gun and tax charges the
president paid a surprised visit over
the weekend to a key witness in Hunter
Biden's gun trial H his former
girlfriend hi Biden the Widow of
Hunter's brother Bo all of this Politico
is reporting Democrats are and this is a
quote and full-blown freakout over
Biden's re-election chances Peter duy at
the White House Peter to witness the
freak
out we're always looking for a freak out
Harris but despite all of that going on
the Biden campaign they're not talking
about the economy they're not talking
about immigration they're not even in a
swing state they are talking about
democracy in New York
City um we're here primarily because of
the threat that Donald Trump poses to
the United States of America and to our
democracy the president is now expected
to address the Trump verdict guilty or
not guilty from the White House to show
the end result as just part of a normal
judicial proceeding that should be
respected that is according to a report
in Politico that we hope Karine can
flesh out at today's briefing in the
meantime we are getting a better sense
of how the Biden campaign plans to keep
attacking Trump pre verdict they are
invoking n 11 and January 6th and
they're warning that if Trump gets
elected he might never leave the White
House again and the messenger for that
Robert
dairo this buffoon running for president
no never could happen we'd forgotten the
lessons of history that showed us other
clowns who weren't taken seriously until
they became vicious
dictators with Trump we have a second
chance and no one is laughing now
President Biden doesn't have any public
events on his schedule today but the
next couple times that we see him we
expect that to be the theme he's going
to keep talking including when he's at
Normandy in France next week for the
D-Day anniversary he's going to keep
talking about how he is a defender of
democracy with the suggestion that
Donald Trump is not Harris he should go
to
Israel I mean you should he should be in
the middle of the action that that his
policies are are you know colliding with
here on the Homeland with all those
people who have the signs genocide Joe I
mean then he could have an actual perge
uh Peter du thank you very much I want
to bring back our attorneys Leo Terell
and Lee zeldon who also is Congressman
in New York and we joined by Doug
Collins former Georgia Congressman great
to see you gentlemen all again um I I do
want to hit some of what's going on in
the courtroom right now because this is
key so the defense attorney Todd blanch
is in the middle of closing arguments
right now and he hit this pretty hard um
he says that at the Time Michael Cohen
the president's the former president's
ex attorney was very worried about his
future so Michael Cohen was very worried
about his future what he would be doing
if Trump won or lost and campaign was
not happy he says Cohen made this
decision he says Cohen is the only one
who says Trump knew about the
payment quote and you cannot cannot
believe his words and quote I'm I'm
quoting Todd blanch we're watching the
courtroom did the former president go by
yet I know they're okay thumbs up from
uh Trump just then we're watching this
live and they'll take a quick break here
or is this one going to be through lunch
I am I'm talking okay so just 10 minutes
here when he comes back we'll watch the
screen again see if he says anything and
they'll take their longer lunch break a
little bit later they usually break
closer to noon and and part ways uh
until about 2 o' so Doug I want to come
to you on that last part where attorney
defense attorney blanch said says you
cannot cannot
believe Michael Cohen's words your
response yeah I mean what would give you
any reason to believe I mean that that's
the problem here there's nothing you
know it's this y saying you know is he
lying now or is he lying then and I
think the truth is he just lying all the
time and I think that's the problem that
Michael Cohen has that's the problem the
prosecution had bringing on a Serial
liar and trying to make the jury
convince that by looking at documents or
looking at something else that all of a
sudden he becomes truthful that's the
problem that the prosecution has here
it's the problem that they've had all
along because number one we should have
never been here to start with this is a
prosecution in search of a crime it's
not there Donald Trump didn't do
anything here and frankly they also had
Cohen actually say something not only is
he lying but he did tell the truth at
one point and I think this is something
is really interesting he actually said I
was on legal retainer doing legal work
for Donald Trump at that moment this
trial should have been over the judge
should have sent the jury out and said
this is over there's nothing left here
because that is what they're arguing
about and it didn't happen that just
shows the persecution here all right uh
lee Elden as I come to you I want to go
back to the attorney uh the defense
attorney blanch who is right now working
for the defense and their closing
arguments he's delivering those um he at
one point he does move to how the record
the recording ends he's talking about
that recording blanch says Cohen was
talking about cash remember Cohen was
surreptitiously recording his own client
Donald Trump at the time and he says
that uh the recording cuts off Cohen
says hello to someone so on and so forth
but it was Cohen lying painting a
picture his version and no evidence of
trump talking about uh a duffel bag full
of
$150,000 yeah that that's right the we
don't hear a recording that actually
establishes the elements uh to be able
to prove this crime for the prosecution
there's more questions than answers why
this attorney would be recording his own
client
is something that would probably
undermine his own credibility with this
jury have to jump in and forgive me
because we've got some breaking news
here uh another Trump legal case and
this one is
federal
for for
spee
for
for
[Music]
for
for for
speech spe spe spee speech
than
for
for for
speech
speech
for e
[Music]
he
for
for
fore
spee for
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
ABC World News Tonight with David Muir Full Broadcast - May 7, 2024
'Threatening the president is a crime': Weissmann on why Trump may have violated his bail conditions
Breaking Down Trump’s Options to Pay $454M Civil-Fraud Penalty | WSJ
Brooks and Capehart on Nikki Haley announcing her support for Trump
Trump on trial: New York vs. Donald Trump Day 5 Highlights
Watch The Last Word With Lawrence O’Donnell Highlights: Feb. 19