The Faulkner Focus 5/28/24 FULL END SHOW | BREAKING NEWS TODAY May 28, 2024

المطبخ العراقي
28 May 202438:22

Summary

TLDR在这段视频脚本中,讨论了美国前总统特朗普在纽约的刑事审判,以及政治界对此案件的反应。辩护律师托德·布兰奇强调了特朗普的无辜,批评了检察官依赖迈克尔·科恩的证词,科恩是特朗普的前律师,也是一名被定罪的说谎者。同时,提到了拜登竞选团队如何利用这个审判来攻击特朗普,强调他对美国民主的威胁。此外,还提到了特朗普的儿子亨特·拜登即将面临的枪支和税务指控的审判。整个讨论集中在案件的政治影响和法律细节上,暗示了审判结果可能对即将到来的总统选举产生影响。

Takeaways

  • 🗣️ 该视频剧本讨论了前总统唐纳德·特朗普在纽约的刑事审判,以及与此相关的政治和社会反响。
  • 📢 特朗普的辩护律师托德·布兰奇(Tod Blanche)在结案陈词中强调,曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格(Alvin Bragg)没有充分证据,认为这是一个不应该发生的审判。
  • 🎥 法庭外,支持特朗普的人士和拜登竞选团队的成员,包括演员罗伯特·戴罗(Robert Dairo),都表达了各自对审判的看法。
  • 📊 讨论了陪审团可能的五种裁决结果:全部有罪、部分有罪、全部无罪、僵局陪审团或法官裁决。
  • 👤 迈克尔·科恩(Michael Cohen)作为此案的关键证人,他的可信度受到辩护方的质疑,他曾是特朗普的律师,但后来因作伪证而被定罪。
  • 🤔 法庭辩论中提到了其他未被召唤的证人,包括艾伦·魏塞尔伯格(Allen Weisselberg),他可能对案件有重要影响,但没有被检方召唤出庭。
  • 📚 法律专家乔纳森·特利(Jonathan Turley)认为,针对特朗普的案件因缺乏证据或明确罪行而应该被判无罪。
  • 🏛️ 讨论了白宫和拜登总统可能对审判结果的反应,预计拜登将在白宫就此案发表讲话。
  • 👨‍👦 还提到了总统拜登的儿子亨特·拜登(Hunter Biden)即将面临的两项审判,涉及枪支和税务指控。
  • 🔍 剧本中还涉及了对特朗普的政治攻击,包括提及1月6日国会山事件,以及对美国民主的所谓威胁。

Q & A

  • 特朗普的辩护团队在纽约刑事审判中的主要论点是什么?

    -特朗普的辩护团队主要论点是曼哈顿地区检察官Alan Bragg没有足够的证据,认为这是一个不应该发生的审判,是出于政治动机的迫害,特朗普本人对支付给Stormy Daniels的款项并不知情,且与所谓的计划无关。

  • 为什么辩护律师Tod Blanche强调迈克尔·科恩(Michael Cohen)的可信度问题?

    -Tod Blanche强调迈克尔·科恩的可信度问题,因为科恩是此案中唯一的关键证人,但他过去有在法庭上撒谎的历史,辩护团队试图说服陪审团不应相信科恩的证词。

  • 在审判中,有哪些证人对特朗普的案件有重要影响?

    -审判中有多位证人出现,包括小报出版商David Pecker,性工作者Stormy Daniels,以及迈克尔·科恩的前法律顾问Robert Costello等,但他们的证词与案件的实际指控关系不大。

  • 为什么说迈克尔·科恩是此案中唯一的关键证人?

    -迈克尔·科恩是特朗普的前律师,他直接涉及到了案件中的支付问题,并且是控方试图证明特朗普有罪的主要证人。尽管他的可信度受到质疑,但他是控方构建案件的核心。

  • 为什么辩护团队认为特朗普不应该为迈克尔·科恩的行为负责?

    -辩护团队认为特朗普没有参与准备文件、发票和支票的工作,他只是认为他在为迈克尔·科恩的法律服务支付合理的费用,因此不应该为科恩的行为负责。

  • 特朗普本人对于这次审判的态度是怎样的?

    -特朗普本人对这次审判持批评态度,他认为这是一个'危险的一天'和'悲哀的一天',认为这是一个被操纵的法庭案件,不应该在总统选举期间进行。

  • 为什么说这次审判对美国来说是一个危险的日子?

    -这次审判被认为是对美国法治和公正的考验,特朗普的支持者可能认为这是政治迫害,而反对者可能认为这是追求正义的必要步骤,因此它可能加剧社会分裂和政治对立。

  • 为什么说这次审判与政治有关?

    -这次审判与政治有关,因为它发生在总统选举的背景下,而且涉及到的是美国前总统特朗普。此外,白宫已经表示,无论判决结果如何,拜登总统都将在白宫就此案件发表讲话。

  • 为什么拜登总统选择在白宫而不是在竞选活动中就特朗普的案件发表讲话?

    -拜登总统选择在白宫发表讲话可能是为了避免给人留下政治宣传的印象,试图显示出对司法程序的尊重,并将讲话定位为总统的官方立场。

  • 为什么说这次审判是曼哈顿地区检察官Alan Bragg的一个风险?

    -这次审判是Alan Bragg的风险,因为他在许多其他人(包括联邦调查局)放弃追究之后,仍然决定提起诉讼。如果审判结果对特朗普有利,可能会对Bragg的职业声誉和未来的政治生涯造成影响。

Outlines

00:00

📢 特朗普纽约刑事审判:辩护方结案陈词

特朗普的辩护律师托德·布兰奇在纽约刑事审判中进行结案陈词,强调特朗普与案件中涉及的文件、发票和支票准备无关,认为曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格没有提出足够的证据。布兰奇还指出,特朗普的前律师迈克尔·科恩作为检方的关键证人,其可信度受到质疑,因为科恩曾被定罪为骗子,并且在法庭上多次撒谎。特朗普在审判前表示,这个案子本应在七年前提出,而不是在他的总统选举期间,他认为这是一个被操纵的法庭案件。

05:01

🗣️ 法律专家分析:特朗普案件应判无罪

宪法律师和福克斯新闻撰稿人乔纳森·特利认为,针对特朗普的案件缺乏证据,应该被驳回。他指出,案件主要依赖于迈克尔·科恩的证词,而科恩是唯一的证人,且未能确立犯罪行为的发生。特利还提到,案件似乎是出于政治动机,旨在阻止特朗普,而不是基于法律事实。此外,他提到了罗伯特·戴罗的言论,暗示这起案件是关于特朗普对美国的破坏,而非实际的罪行。

10:03

🤔 陪审团裁决的五种可能及其政治影响

随着特朗普案件的审判接近尾声,讨论了陪审团可能的五种裁决结果:全部有罪、部分有罪、全部无罪、僵局陪审团或法官的裁决。分析了每种结果对政治的影响,包括特朗普如果被判有罪或无罪可能对即将到来的总统选举产生的影响。同时,提到了拜登竞选团队如何利用这个案件来攻击特朗普,以及他们如何将焦点放在特朗普对美国民主的威胁上。

15:04

👥 法庭内外:特朗普支持者与反对者的对峙

法庭外,特朗普的支持者和反对者发生了对峙。特朗普的支持者在公园集会,而拜登竞选团队的支持者,包括演员罗伯特·戴罗,举行了新闻发布会。戴罗在讲话中提到特朗普想要破坏美国,而特朗普的支持者则回应表示他们爱特朗普和他们的国家。法庭内,特朗普的辩护团队继续他们的结案陈词,强调特朗普的无辜,并试图削弱科恩证词的可信度。

20:05

📚 法律分析:为何特朗普案应判无罪

法律专家和前检察官特雷·高蒂和李·泽尔登讨论了为何特朗普案件应该判决无罪。他们指出,科恩作为唯一的关键证人,其证词不足以证明特朗普的罪行。高蒂提到,科恩曾表示他在为特朗普提供法律服务时,特朗普并未参与任何不当行为。泽尔登则强调,科恩的可信度问题以及他作为被定罪的伪证者的历史,使得他的证词不足以构成有罪判决的基础。

25:07

🎙️ 政治评论:拜登对特朗普案件的沉默即将打破

据报道,一旦特朗普案件的裁决结果出炉,美国总统拜登将打破沉默,从白宫而非竞选集会上发表讲话。分析人士认为,这表明拜登将此案视为其竞选活动的一部分,旨在强调特朗普对美国民主的威胁。同时,拜登的竞选团队正在利用1月6日的国会山事件来警告选民,如果特朗普再次当选,他可能不会和平离开白宫。

30:27

🎶 音乐插曲

在视频脚本中,有一个段落包含了音乐元素,但没有提供具体的内容或对话。因此,这部分可能是视频节目中的过渡或间隔部分,用以调整节目节奏或为接下来的内容提供背景音乐。

36:02

📞 特朗普另一法律案件:联邦层面的诉讼

在特朗普纽约刑事审判的同时,还有另一起涉及特朗普的联邦法律案件正在进展中。这部分内容在脚本中并未详细说明,但从上下文中可以推测,这可能与特朗普的政治活动或其商业行为有关,且可能对他的法律地位产生影响。

Mindmap

Keywords

💡特朗普

特朗普是视频中提及的美国前总统,围绕他展开的刑事审判是视频讨论的核心内容。特朗普被指控与支付给Stormy Daniels的封口费有关的犯罪行为,这直接关系到视频的主题和讨论焦点。

💡刑事审判

刑事审判是指对被控犯罪行为的个人或实体进行的法律程序。在视频中,特朗普正在经历一场刑事审判,这关系到他的名誉和法律地位,是整个视频讨论的中心议题。

💡封口费

封口费通常指的是为了阻止某人公开某些信息而支付的款项。视频中,特朗普被指控支付封口费给Stormy Daniels,以阻止她公开与特朗普有关的负面信息,这是审判的关键要素之一。

💡迈克尔·科恩

迈克尔·科恩是特朗普的前律师,他在视频中作为检方的关键证人出现。科恩的证词和他对特朗普行为的描述对审判结果有重大影响,他的角色和可信度是视频讨论的重要方面。

💡Stormy Daniels

Stormy Daniels是一名成人影片演员,她与特朗普之间的所谓关系及封口费事件是视频讨论的焦点之一。她的角色和与特朗普的关联构成了刑事审判的背景故事。

💡政治

视频中提到政治因素对审判的影响,暗示审判可能受到政治动机的驱动。政治在视频中被用作分析审判背后可能的动机和影响,是理解视频内容的关键概念之一。

💡白宫

白宫作为美国总统的官邸和办公室,在视频中提到,暗示了美国总统可能对审判结果发表意见,这表明了政府对事件的关注和可能的政治立场。

💡证人

证人在刑事审判中提供证据的人。视频中提到了多个证人,包括Stormy Daniels和迈克尔·科恩,他们的证词对审判结果至关重要。

💡辩护

辩护是法律程序中被告方提出的理由和证据,用以反驳指控。视频中特朗普的辩护团队为其辩护,辩护策略和论点是理解视频内容的重要组成部分。

💡审判结果

审判结果是法官或陪审团对案件的最终裁决。视频中多次提到对审判结果的预测和等待,这是整个视频叙事的高潮和观众关注的焦点。

Highlights

特朗普的辩护律师托德·布兰奇(Tod Blanche)在纽约刑事审判的结案陈词中表示,曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格(Alvin Bragg)没有案件,这是一场不应该发生的审判。

特朗普前私人律师迈克尔·科恩(Michael Cohen)被辩护方描述为唯一证人,且其可信度受到质疑。

特朗普本人在庭审前表示,该案件应在七年前提出,而不是在他的总统选举期间,认为这是一个被操纵的法庭案件。

陪审团可能的裁决包括特朗普在所有指控上均被判有罪、部分有罪、完全无罪,或者可能出现僵局陪审团或法官裁决。

法庭外,特朗普的支持者和拜登竞选团队的成员,包括演员罗伯特·戴罗(Robert Dairo),发生了对峙。

福克斯新闻撰稿人乔纳森·特利(Jonathan Turley)认为,针对特朗普的案件因缺乏证据或可认定的罪行而应被驳回。

特朗普的辩护律师强调,特朗普与准备文件、发票和支票无关,他认为自己正在为迈克尔·科恩的法律服务支付费用。

法庭上播放了特朗普前白宫通讯主管霍普·希克斯(Hope Hicks)的证词,她表示特朗普不希望他的家人因与Stormy Daniels的事件而受到伤害或尴尬。

法庭外,特朗普的支持者和反对者之间的紧张气氛加剧,双方都表达了对审判结果的期待和担忧。

拜登竞选团队计划在审判结果出炉后,从白宫发表声明,而不是在竞选活动中,以显示对司法程序的尊重。

特朗普的辩护律师指出,迈克尔·科恩在录音中提到现金,但录音被剪辑,没有特朗普谈论有关150,000美元的证据。

法庭辩论中,辩护方强调科恩作为律师,持续为特朗普提供法律服务,尽管他支付了款项并被辩护方描述为“惯犯骗子”。

法庭辩论中,辩护方指出科恩在作证时承认了他在为特朗普提供法律服务的同时,也在进行其他活动。

特朗普的辩护律师强调,案件与Stormy Daniels或其周围的故事无关,而是关于文件,特朗普与所谓的计划无关。

法庭辩论中,辩护方指出,科恩在法庭上的故事不真实,他在过去曾在宣誓下撒谎。

法庭辩论中,辩护方强调,科恩曾承认自己是骗子,这一点在法庭上被辩护方重复强调。

拜登竞选团队利用审判作为攻击特朗普的手段,警告如果特朗普当选,他可能永远不会离开白宫。

特朗普的辩护律师在结案陈词中指出,科恩是唯一声称特朗普知道付款的人,而你不能相信他的话。

特朗普的辩护律师强调,科恩在录音中被剪辑的部分显示他在撒谎,没有特朗普讨论有关150,000美元的证据。

Transcripts

00:00

at uh January 6 and that some of them

00:02

hadn't told the truth and so on and so

00:04

forth Dao of course dropping his usual

00:06

bad language sorry about that um but in

00:09

the meantime Jason Miller comes out and

00:10

he answers back to that this is the

00:12

first time that Republicans have been

00:14

challenged at all outside the courthouse

00:16

supporting Donald Trump the former

00:19

president inside has had guests inside

00:21

also with him lawmakers of we've seen

00:23

over the last couple of weeks however

00:25

outside has been kind of a more steady

00:27

drum beat for him you've had people GA

00:30

to watch that media from all over the

00:32

world as you might imagine today is the

00:34

first day that the Biden campaign has

00:35

decided that maybe they want to share

00:37

some of that Limelight uh so they've

00:39

stepped in and of course we heard from

00:40

the uh the White House today that at

00:42

some point after the verdict probably

00:44

rather immediately you'll hear not the

00:46

president take a stage that would be you

00:49

know more political cuz who doesn't

00:51

think this is about politics I I don't

00:53

know where that one person is but anyway

00:56

so it won't be on like a stage somewhere

00:57

at a campaign event that he'll speak

00:59

he'll speak to the ation from the White

01:01

House about this case when the verdict

01:03

comes down politics are looming large

01:06

looming large you see it right now let's

01:09

go to the courtroom and what's happening

01:11

in that historic Showdown former

01:13

president Trump's defense is giving its

01:15

closing arguments in his New York

01:17

criminal trial and then it will be the

01:19

prosecution's turn and we've been

01:21

following this together for weeks now

01:22

minute-by-minute coverage reminder on

01:25

the right side of your screen is from

01:26

our team inside the courtroom in the

01:28

Overflow room giving us an everyday Tik

01:31

Tok of what's going on so you can check

01:32

that moment by moment we'll also have

01:34

everything that's going on in analysis

01:36

right here live you are in the fauler

01:38

focus I'm Harris fauler arguments are

01:42

hours long they are a recap by both the

01:45

defense in the prosecution today a recap

01:48

of their key points from The Trial what

01:50

each side wants to put at the top of a

01:52

juror's mind before that person begins

01:55

deliberating in that group of jurors of

01:57

12 22 Witnesses have taken the stand in

02:00

the trial and they include David pecker

02:02

the Tabloid publisher who testified he

02:04

bought and buried negative stories about

02:06

a lot of celebrities not just the former

02:09

president Donald Trump stormmy Daniels

02:11

the sex film worker at the center of the

02:14

case gave well she's a sex film worker

02:16

so the details were graphic who didn't

02:18

see that coming I bet the prosecution

02:21

did anyway what they didn't Bank on was

02:23

how unrelated they were going to be

02:25

taken to the actual charges in question

02:27

she talked about a lot just didn't have

02:29

anything to do with this case Michael

02:31

con the former attorney and so-called

02:34

fixer convicted liar and prisoned for it

02:39

whose credibility has been hit over and

02:42

over again by the defense Robert

02:44

Costello a former legal advisor to

02:46

Michael Cohen who says Michael Cohen is

02:48

a liar was a liar then and is a liar now

02:50

that's a lot of lying but he's on the

02:53

stand as a star witness for the

02:54

prosecution at least he was here's the

02:56

former president before the start of the

02:58

arguments today

03:00

they should have brought this case seven

03:01

years ago not in the middle of my

03:03

presidential election we have a rigged

03:05

court case that should have never been

03:07

brought and it should have been brought

03:09

in another jurisdiction this is a very

03:11

dangerous day for America it's a very

03:13

Saad day thank you are you worried about

03:14

a

03:17

conviction so five ways this could go

03:20

take a look at your screen if you're not

03:21

directly in front of your phone or

03:23

device or TV or whatever you're watching

03:24

on jurors could find Trump guilty on all

03:27

counts jurors could find Trump Trump

03:30

guilty on some counts jurors could

03:32

acquit him of all charges it could also

03:35

potentially end in a hung jury or a

03:37

fifth less likely outcome a bench ruling

03:40

with no jury involved so that would just

03:43

be the judge the New York Post cover

03:46

with a dig at the Manhattan district

03:48

attorney who brought this case after

03:49

many people including the feds had

03:52

already passed on trying to have this

03:56

adjudicated look at it nothing to brag

03:58

about notice that you just like Alvin

04:00

Bragg the da who brought the case spells

04:02

his last name constitutional law

04:04

attorney and Fox News contributor

04:06

Jonathan Turley is standing by first to

04:08

senior correspondent Eric Shawn to catch

04:10

us up on what already has happened in

04:12

the courthouse

04:14

Eric well lot happening outside the

04:16

courthouse as far as inside the

04:18

courthouse right now it is the case put

04:21

put forward for former president Trump

04:23

by his defense attorney Tod blanch and

04:26

Mr blanch is echoing exactly what his

04:28

client said this morning or arrived here

04:30

in court and that is that Manhattan

04:32

district attorney Alan brag has no

04:36

case everybody says this is crazy this

04:39

is not a trial that should happen it's a

04:42

it's a very sad day this is a dark day

04:44

in America we have a rigged court case

04:47

that should have never been

04:50

brought in aimation of the jury Bland

04:53

said that Trump had nothing to do with

04:55

preparing the paperwork invoices and

04:56

checks and that he did think he was

04:58

properly paying Michael Cohen for his

05:01

Legal Services Bland said quote

05:04

president Trump is innocent he did not

05:06

commit any crimes the district attorney

05:08

did not meet the burden of proof period

05:11

blance told the jury that the case is

05:13

not about Stormy Daniels or the

05:15

salacious story surrounding her but

05:17

about the documents and that Trump had

05:19

nothing to do with the alleged scheme he

05:21

noted that Michael Cohen a repeated liar

05:24

continued to render legal services for

05:26

the former president when he was paying

05:28

him and told everybody who was Trump's

05:30

personal attorney and of course blanch

05:33

brought up that Cohen is an admitted

05:34

serial liar who has lied under oath in

05:37

the past and cannot be believed he said

05:39

quote Cohen lied to you he lied to you

05:42

the story Mr Cohen told on the witness

05:45

stand is not true then prosecutors will

05:48

have the last word in his closing it is

05:50

expected that Assistant Attorney Joshua

05:52

steinglass will lay out the evidence

05:54

against Trump and he will claim that

05:56

Michael Cohen did tell the truth and his

05:58

claims are corroborated ated by other

06:00

Witnesses and the documents and Harris

06:03

as you noted there's a lot of activity

06:04

outside Pro Trump supporters here in the

06:07

park and we heard that uh Biden campaign

06:10

supported a news conference by some

06:12

supporters including actor Robert dairo

06:15

here's part of what daero just

06:17

said I love this

06:20

city I love this city I don't want to

06:23

destroy it Donald Trump wants to destroy

06:26

not only the city but the country and

06:30

eventually he could destroy the

06:33

world well as he was speaking you could

06:35

hear their prot Trump supporters are

06:37

yelling at him saying we love Trump we

06:39

love our country uh saying that merchan

06:43

a judge merchan Juan mchan should be uh

06:46

uh uh actually thrown into jail

06:48

according to one so that's a bit of the

06:50

atmosphere out here well inside the uh

06:53

summations are continuing we expect them

06:55

to continue through at least lunch the

06:57

jury likely getting this case finally

06:59

tomorrow then we will all wait to see

07:03

what happens Harris back to you oh we

07:05

are perched and ready great job Eric

07:06

Sean always thank you Jonathan turley's

07:09

new opinion piece here's why the case

07:12

against Trump should end in not guilty a

07:16

quote from that piece this case should

07:17

have been Mis dismissed for a lack of

07:19

evidence or cognizable crime the jury

07:23

will be reminded that the burden is on

07:25

the government not the defense end of

07:27

quote there and here's at the White

07:28

House today

07:30

in focus with me now great to have you

07:33

Jonathan Turley has stepped away for

07:34

just a second so talk to me if you would

07:37

about the case for Donald Trump and why

07:41

this all just needs to be found not

07:45

guilty well I think that this case uh

07:48

really never re really amounted to much

07:51

other than Michael Cohen which is

07:53

surprised many of us we thought that

07:55

Bragg was holding more evidence and more

07:58

witnesses otherwise no one would go

08:01

forward with this in fact Bragg himself

08:03

said that there was no way he would

08:05

bring a case that would call Michael

08:07

Cohen on the stand well he ended up

08:09

putting on a case that was entirely

08:10

Michael Cohen literally he's the only

08:12

witness that has addressed the elements

08:15

of the crime and even he wasn't able to

08:17

establish that they occurred and so what

08:20

we're really looking at now is really

08:24

what Robert daero said you know I I

08:26

would love to replay it because what

08:28

Robert daero said was this is all about

08:31

Trump destroying America it was no

08:34

reference to the actual crimes this this

08:37

case was a vehicle to stop Trump in his

08:40

View and he says that out in front of

08:41

the courthouse it was a telling moment

08:44

because I think that brag really hopes

08:46

that the jury won't look beyond the

08:48

identity of the defendant that's the

08:51

reason I think the defense has to be

08:54

very honest and very open with this jury

08:57

and to tell them look we know that some

08:59

of you don't like the defendant the

09:02

question is whether that's enough for

09:03

you or whether you believe that no one

09:06

in New York should be convicted without

09:09

a cognizable crime or evidence because

09:12

this case has neither um Jonathan I want

09:15

to hit this with you because you you you

09:17

brought up who we did see you know the

09:19

one witness that you say actually did at

09:21

least talk about what was happening in

09:24

the case he even during that questioning

09:26

though it was never made clear what the

09:27

underlying crime was and all of this so

09:29

there you have your star witness but the

09:31

other person who didn't testify was

09:33

someone who the New York Times has

09:34

written about the star witness who never

09:36

testified at Trump's trial is is the

09:38

headline for them and they say that

09:40

there was a third person in the room in

09:42

terms of when a check or several checks

09:45

would have been signed and that would be

09:47

uh Alan we

09:48

weiselberg and and the prosecution

09:50

didn't call him to testify although he

09:52

knows the truth this is according to the

09:54

New York Times he has not told it ever

09:57

he is serving time in Riker's Island we

09:59

know that after pleading guilty to a

10:01

perjury in an unrelated civil case

10:03

involving Trump so I I want to ask you

10:05

what could weiselberg have brought this

10:06

case and is that a Miss for the defense

10:09

too they could have called

10:12

him quite frankly I don't think it is a

10:14

Miss for the defense uh for a couple of

10:17

reasons first of all as I said in that

10:18

New York Post piece the absence of

10:21

weiselberg has got to be hit by the uh

10:23

defense in its closing argument there's

10:26

only one reason why the government would

10:28

not call Wis ber and that's that

10:30

weiselberg would contradict Cohen why

10:33

else would you put a Serial purger on

10:34

the stand but not the guy that he keeps

10:37

on referencing it was an agreement

10:39

between Cohen and weiselberg that

10:41

defined this as a retainer and yet they

10:45

didn't call that other half of the

10:47

agreement for the defense there's

10:49

reasons why they didn't call him because

10:52

weiselberg could have been just as they

10:54

saw with Castello used to bring in a

10:56

whole bunch of other areas uh that they

10:59

could control also for weiselberg this

11:01

is a prosecution that has repeatedly

11:03

threatened him to prosecute him again so

11:06

he won't be eager to cross the

11:08

prosecutors and look at another stint at

11:10

Rikers yeah well and what you're saying

11:13

is they probably wouldn't have cut him

11:14

uh you know a sweetheart deal as we've

11:17

seen with some uh Jonathan turle thank

11:19

you so very much for getting us kicked

11:21

off here with what's going on from your

11:23

legal perspective all that experience we

11:25

appreciate it thank you Harris well we

11:27

are following closing arguments minute

11:29

by minute again the right box on your

11:31

screen uh we'll have an update that you

11:34

can just check on the screen real

11:35

quickly and of course all the coverage

11:37

all the analysis a former president of

11:39

the United States now en closing

11:42

arguments the prosecution as you heard

11:44

from Jonathan Turley what will they work

11:46

with a lying star witness a Fox News

11:49

Alert as we are waiting inside the

11:51

courtroom right now are the closing

11:53

arguments that began about 2 hours well

11:55

about 90 minutes or so they're expected

11:57

to go all day long the defense goes

11:58

first first in this New York trial and

12:01

president Trump's defense uh delivering

12:04

that now Trey gouty former Federal

12:06

prosecutor former South Carolina

12:08

congressman and host of Sunday night in

12:10

America right here on fnc Leo Terell

12:14

also a Fox News contributor and Lee

12:17

zeldon former Republican Congressman of

12:19

New York a legal surrogate to former

12:21

president Trump great to see all of you

12:23

um Trey I'm going to start with you and

12:26

and the idea that Michael Cohen is the

12:28

star Witness I want to play something

12:30

and then have you talk out of it this is

12:32

Michael Cohen's former attorney Bob

12:34

Costello who testified at the trial we

12:36

know uh he told Fox that Cohen's

12:39

statements changed on the payment to

12:41

Stormy Daniels that's what this case is

12:43

supposed to be about that payment that

12:45

hush money as it's been called let's

12:47

watch what Bob cast or rather yeah Bob

12:49

Costello and see what he

12:50

said he kept on saying I have nothing on

12:54

Donald Trump and then when we got into

12:56

the discussion of the Stormy Daniels NDA

12:59

he said specifically and I

13:02

cross-examined him on this this was my

13:05

idea it was his idea to take care of the

13:08

NDA because he had been contacted by a

13:10

lawyer for Stormy Daniels who said she

13:12

was going to claim that Donald Trump had

13:14

sex with her cooh said I didn't believe

13:16

the allegation but nevertheless it would

13:19

be embarrassing to Melania that's

13:21

Michael coh's

13:23

words Trey your

13:27

response yeah I was actually in the the

13:29

courtroom last week when Mr Costello

13:31

testified the words he used his

13:34

testimony could have been incredibly

13:36

helpful to the defense regrettably his

13:40

demeanor the manner in which he

13:42

testified was not uh you cannot get into

13:45

a fight with the judge the jury is going

13:47

to relate to the judge so at best I

13:50

thought his testimony was a wash and it

13:53

may have actually wound up hurting the

13:56

defense I will also say this I want to

13:59

say hello to my old colleague Lee zeldon

14:01

who's a former prosecutor look the

14:03

prosecution's going to stand up and say

14:05

Michael Costello is I mean Michael C is

14:08

not a great witness he he he he he's

14:10

convicted perjurer he doesn't like Trump

14:12

but guess what we didn't pick him Donald

14:15

Trump picked the witnesses I would have

14:16

preferred a Catholic none I would have

14:18

preferred a first grade school teacher

14:20

but that's not who Donald Trump used as

14:22

his lawyer that's not who he used to

14:24

engage in this Catan kill scheme so we

14:27

didn't pick Michael Cohen as a witness

14:29

Donald Trump did that is what the

14:31

prosecution's going to argue later this

14:33

afternoon so um Lee Eldon I didn't

14:36

realize you guys had known each other

14:37

from your prosecutorial days that's

14:39

great information when I interviewed uh

14:42

the former president at the White House

14:44

it was the day after Michael Cohen had

14:46

been um sentenced and that would have

14:49

been in December of 2018 when I sat down

14:51

with him I asked him why in the world

14:52

did you hire this guy and what he said

14:55

was he made a mistake that he never

14:57

should have hired Michael Cohen that was

14:59

was all those years ago and so when the

15:01

prosecution makes the argument well he

15:03

pick

15:04

them everybody has known that all the

15:07

way down in the last six years right and

15:09

look at where we are today yet Alvin

15:11

Bragg picks this case and picks that guy

15:14

to be the star witness they did in fact

15:16

do the

15:18

choosing yeah they really didn't have

15:21

anyone else to call to be able to give

15:24

this testimony in place of Michael Cohen

15:26

uh there was some conversation here

15:28

about the CFO weiselberg who the

15:30

prosecution decides not to call uh but

15:34

weiselberg is not going to testify what

15:36

Cohen was testifying to and there was no

15:38

other option so you put you put it all

15:40

on Michael Cohen to prove your entire

15:42

case and this is somebody who is a

15:44

convicted perjurer who has contradicted

15:47

himself with past statements that have

15:49

been made over the years uh now you're

15:51

in a situation where you're in court

15:53

you're giving closing arguments the

15:55

defense has to go first here in this new

15:57

york-based trial

15:59

and they still don't know what the

16:01

underlying charge is to elevate this

16:03

from misdemeanor to a felony we might

16:06

for the first time hear it during the

16:08

prosecution's closing argument but

16:10

that's the last word of the entire case

16:12

uh and the defense doesn't get an

16:14

opportunity to rebut it this is

16:16

something that should have been known

16:17

UPF front uh and here here we are uh at

16:21

this point giving closing arguments

16:22

they've entirely relied on this one

16:24

person uh and they should have passed on

16:27

his prosecution real quickly Le could

16:29

they have changed this around I mean I

16:31

know in New York and I mentioned that

16:32

the defense goes first or in New York I

16:34

get it but in a place where you don't

16:36

have the crime where you don't know what

16:39

that underlying second crime is could

16:41

the judge have made his own judgment in

16:44

this and said we're going to we're going

16:45

to flip-flop it because you've got to

16:47

know what to defend and so prosecution

16:49

you go first so we can be clear on what

16:51

all the crimes are and the jury can be

16:53

two and then defend you go second could

16:55

that have

16:56

happened well I I'll tell you first is

16:59

with the judge's Powers when the

17:01

prosecution rested the judge just issued

17:04

a directed verdict at that point the

17:06

judge still could order a directed

17:09

verdict at this point flipping the order

17:12

in as far as fundamental fairness the

17:14

burden is on the government and in this

17:16

case where you have to establish that

17:19

there's an underlying charge which they

17:21

still haven't indicated what it is in

17:23

all fairness they should have been

17:25

giving the defense an opportunity to

17:27

respond all right I I want get back to

17:29

and and go forward because Leo I feel

17:31

like the jurors may forget some of this

17:33

testimony uh and and I would imagine

17:36

this is where the defense will go why

17:37

would president Trump have not wanted

17:40

anybody to know that he had even met a

17:44

sex film worker named Stormy Daniels

17:46

let's watch hopix his former White House

17:48

comms director talk to that uh right

17:51

here's what she said in court of course

17:52

we can't show you the video cuz we

17:54

didn't have C cameras in court but we've

17:55

got what she said she said I don't think

17:57

he wanted anyone in his his family to be

17:59

hurt or embarrassed by what's happening

18:00

on the campaign president Trump really

18:03

values Mrs Trump's opinion and she

18:04

doesn't weigh in all the time but when

18:06

she does it's meaningful to him I think

18:08

he was just concerned about what her

18:10

perception of this would be I know that

18:12

was weighing on him

18:14

Leo hope hick Harris is a credible

18:18

witness she has no dog in the fight so

18:21

what she gave the Trump defense team

18:24

were

18:25

alternatives to the idea that Trump

18:28

alleged ually PID this money to hide a

18:31

or was a campaign violation she was

18:34

credible and that's why her testimony

18:36

should be played in hard by the def

18:40

defense team let me be very clear about

18:42

this the defense team is focusing on

18:45

Witnesses or jurors haris that are very

18:48

solidly in the Trump camp and I can

18:50

guarantee you that the defense team is

18:52

aware of the jurors who are in their

18:55

camp they're playing to the attorneys

18:58

they're play to the two attorneys who

19:00

are going to probably provide the

19:03

Insight on the information you know what

19:06

uh there is in fact a Daily Caller

19:08

article about that and it says the panel

19:11

of 12 jurors includes a young corporate

19:13

law attorney and a civil litigation

19:15

attorney and the headline uh was that

19:18

perhaps the brag team should worry that

19:20

having lawyers on the Trump jury could

19:22

lead to an acquittal your thoughts on

19:24

that

19:25

Leo oh there's no question about it

19:27

because I'll tell you right now now most

19:29

attorneys do not want attorneys in the

19:31

jury box but in this case we don't know

19:34

what the charges are when you have

19:36

credibility at issue Todd blanch is

19:39

playing to those two attorneys Harris

19:42

because he's hoping that they provide

19:44

the Insight that this trial judge did

19:46

not provide he's hoping that these two

19:49

attorneys provide just common sense

19:51

logic as far as the rule of law and what

19:54

facts were played as of right now we

19:56

have three attorneys here on your show

19:58

we don't know what the federal charges

20:00

are we don't know what facts actually

20:03

indicates a crime against Trump but yet

20:05

those two attorneys are critical to this

20:07

case that's fascinating and you only

20:10

need one Trey I've heard you say it so

20:11

many times Trey Lee and Leo thank you so

20:14

very much for joining me early I

20:15

appreciate you former president Trump's

20:18

legal team giving their closing

20:19

arguments right now and then the

20:21

prosecution will do the same thing we're

20:22

with you all day long here on Fox News

20:24

channel fnc for the cool kids stay here

20:31

arguments are underway right now in

20:32

former president Trump's new criminal

20:34

trial Politico is reporting that once

20:36

the verdict is in President Biden will

20:39

jump into the pool and actually break

20:42

his silence on the case and that he will

20:44

do so from the White House rather than

20:45

from a campaign stump now remember right

20:47

when we got this uh hour started I was

20:50

talking about how he would want to I

20:53

would imagine avoid the appearance of a

20:55

political statement um and so he'll do

20:57

this from the White House house but it's

20:59

political what's going on so I don't

21:01

know hatack anybody does that even come

21:03

into play Fox News contributor Charlie

21:05

hurt doesn't buy any of this

21:07

watch look at all of the big major

21:10

issues that Americans actually care

21:11

about that took uh Joe Biden a long time

21:14

to address it took him a long time to

21:16

address the attack in Israel the

21:18

terrorist attack in Israel it it has

21:20

taken him forever to address the crisis

21:22

at the border and I would argue he still

21:24

has never actually addressed it but even

21:26

before the verdict is read

21:29

he's announcing that he's going to

21:31

address this issue it's because this is

21:34

the issue that that Joe Biden is running

21:36

on I think it's going to fail I think

21:37

it's the whole thing is blown up in his

21:39

face well Donald Trump's trial is

21:42

wrapping up and the president's son

21:43

Hunter Biden will face two trials during

21:45

the campaign on gun and tax charges the

21:48

president paid a surprised visit over

21:49

the weekend to a key witness in Hunter

21:51

Biden's gun trial H his former

21:53

girlfriend hi Biden the Widow of

21:55

Hunter's brother Bo all of this Politico

21:59

is reporting Democrats are and this is a

22:01

quote and full-blown freakout over

22:03

Biden's re-election chances Peter duy at

22:06

the White House Peter to witness the

22:08

freak

22:09

out we're always looking for a freak out

22:12

Harris but despite all of that going on

22:15

the Biden campaign they're not talking

22:17

about the economy they're not talking

22:19

about immigration they're not even in a

22:20

swing state they are talking about

22:23

democracy in New York

22:26

City um we're here primarily because of

22:29

the threat that Donald Trump poses to

22:32

the United States of America and to our

22:35

democracy the president is now expected

22:37

to address the Trump verdict guilty or

22:39

not guilty from the White House to show

22:41

the end result as just part of a normal

22:43

judicial proceeding that should be

22:45

respected that is according to a report

22:46

in Politico that we hope Karine can

22:48

flesh out at today's briefing in the

22:50

meantime we are getting a better sense

22:52

of how the Biden campaign plans to keep

22:54

attacking Trump pre verdict they are

22:57

invoking n 11 and January 6th and

23:00

they're warning that if Trump gets

23:02

elected he might never leave the White

23:04

House again and the messenger for that

23:06

Robert

23:08

dairo this buffoon running for president

23:11

no never could happen we'd forgotten the

23:14

lessons of history that showed us other

23:16

clowns who weren't taken seriously until

23:19

they became vicious

23:21

dictators with Trump we have a second

23:25

chance and no one is laughing now

23:29

President Biden doesn't have any public

23:31

events on his schedule today but the

23:33

next couple times that we see him we

23:35

expect that to be the theme he's going

23:37

to keep talking including when he's at

23:38

Normandy in France next week for the

23:40

D-Day anniversary he's going to keep

23:41

talking about how he is a defender of

23:43

democracy with the suggestion that

23:45

Donald Trump is not Harris he should go

23:48

to

23:49

Israel I mean you should he should be in

23:52

the middle of the action that that his

23:53

policies are are you know colliding with

23:56

here on the Homeland with all those

23:57

people who have the signs genocide Joe I

24:00

mean then he could have an actual perge

24:03

uh Peter du thank you very much I want

24:05

to bring back our attorneys Leo Terell

24:07

and Lee zeldon who also is Congressman

24:08

in New York and we joined by Doug

24:10

Collins former Georgia Congressman great

24:13

to see you gentlemen all again um I I do

24:15

want to hit some of what's going on in

24:17

the courtroom right now because this is

24:19

key so the defense attorney Todd blanch

24:22

is in the middle of closing arguments

24:23

right now and he hit this pretty hard um

24:27

he says that at the Time Michael Cohen

24:31

the president's the former president's

24:32

ex attorney was very worried about his

24:35

future so Michael Cohen was very worried

24:37

about his future what he would be doing

24:40

if Trump won or lost and campaign was

24:42

not happy he says Cohen made this

24:44

decision he says Cohen is the only one

24:47

who says Trump knew about the

24:50

payment quote and you cannot cannot

24:52

believe his words and quote I'm I'm

24:54

quoting Todd blanch we're watching the

24:56

courtroom did the former president go by

24:58

yet I know they're okay thumbs up from

25:01

uh Trump just then we're watching this

25:04

live and they'll take a quick break here

25:06

or is this one going to be through lunch

25:08

I am I'm talking okay so just 10 minutes

25:11

here when he comes back we'll watch the

25:12

screen again see if he says anything and

25:14

they'll take their longer lunch break a

25:16

little bit later they usually break

25:17

closer to noon and and part ways uh

25:19

until about 2 o' so Doug I want to come

25:23

to you on that last part where attorney

25:26

defense attorney blanch said says you

25:29

cannot cannot

25:30

believe Michael Cohen's words your

25:34

response yeah I mean what would give you

25:36

any reason to believe I mean that that's

25:38

the problem here there's nothing you

25:39

know it's this y saying you know is he

25:41

lying now or is he lying then and I

25:43

think the truth is he just lying all the

25:44

time and I think that's the problem that

25:46

Michael Cohen has that's the problem the

25:47

prosecution had bringing on a Serial

25:49

liar and trying to make the jury

25:51

convince that by looking at documents or

25:55

looking at something else that all of a

25:56

sudden he becomes truthful that's the

25:58

problem that the prosecution has here

25:59

it's the problem that they've had all

26:01

along because number one we should have

26:02

never been here to start with this is a

26:04

prosecution in search of a crime it's

26:05

not there Donald Trump didn't do

26:07

anything here and frankly they also had

26:09

Cohen actually say something not only is

26:11

he lying but he did tell the truth at

26:13

one point and I think this is something

26:14

is really interesting he actually said I

26:16

was on legal retainer doing legal work

26:18

for Donald Trump at that moment this

26:19

trial should have been over the judge

26:21

should have sent the jury out and said

26:22

this is over there's nothing left here

26:24

because that is what they're arguing

26:26

about and it didn't happen that just

26:28

shows the persecution here all right uh

26:30

lee Elden as I come to you I want to go

26:32

back to the attorney uh the defense

26:35

attorney blanch who is right now working

26:37

for the defense and their closing

26:39

arguments he's delivering those um he at

26:42

one point he does move to how the record

26:45

the recording ends he's talking about

26:47

that recording blanch says Cohen was

26:49

talking about cash remember Cohen was

26:51

surreptitiously recording his own client

26:54

Donald Trump at the time and he says

26:56

that uh the recording cuts off Cohen

26:59

says hello to someone so on and so forth

27:01

but it was Cohen lying painting a

27:03

picture his version and no evidence of

27:05

trump talking about uh a duffel bag full

27:08

of

27:13

$150,000 yeah that that's right the we

27:15

don't hear a recording that actually

27:17

establishes the elements uh to be able

27:20

to prove this crime for the prosecution

27:22

there's more questions than answers why

27:25

this attorney would be recording his own

27:27

client

27:28

is something that would probably

27:30

undermine his own credibility with this

27:33

jury have to jump in and forgive me

27:35

because we've got some breaking news

27:37

here uh another Trump legal case and

27:39

this one is

27:57

federal

28:27

for for

29:27

spee

29:57

for

30:26

for

30:41

[Music]

30:56

for

31:26

for for

32:08

speech spe spe spee speech

32:56

than

33:26

for

33:56

for for

34:37

speech

34:56

speech

35:26

for e

36:01

[Music]

36:26

he

36:56

for

37:26

for

37:32

fore

37:56

spee for