Meet the Press full broadcast — March 24

NBC News
24 Mar 202447:40

Summary

TLDRIn this interview, former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer discusses the impact of the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, and his views on the current state of the Supreme Court. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the real-world consequences of court rulings and expresses disappointment over the leak of the draft opinion. Justice Breyer also shares his thoughts on the retirement process and the ideological balance of the Court, highlighting the need for a non-partisan approach to judicial appointments.

Takeaways

  • 💰 President Biden has a cash advantage over Donald Trump in the 2024 campaign, highlighting the financial disparity between the two potential candidates.
  • 🏦 Trump's legal bills are mounting, and he is seeking campaign donors to help pay them, indicating financial strain on his campaign.
  • 🤝 Ronna McDaniel, former RNC chair, discusses the tension and friction within the Republican Party, particularly regarding the handling of debates and the nomination process.
  • 🚨 McDaniel's interview raises questions about the role of the RNC in the 2020 election and the party's future direction.
  • 🎤 The panel discussion highlights the importance of journalistic integrity and the challenges of representing diverse viewpoints in the media.
  • 📖 Retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer speaks on the impact of the Dobbs decision and the importance of considering real-world consequences in constitutional interpretation.
  • 🚨 Breyer's retirement and the changing ideological balance on the Supreme Court are discussed, emphasizing the impact of these changes on future court decisions.
  • 🤔 The conversation with Breyer touches on the potential for compromise in Supreme Court decisions, but also the difficulty in predicting the long-term effects of such decisions.
  • 📉 Trust in the Supreme Court is reported to be near an all-time low, reflecting increased political polarization and public skepticism.
  • 🏛️ The historical context of Supreme Court nominations is provided, contrasting the bipartisan support for Breyer's appointment with the current highly partisan confirmation process.
  • 📚 Breyer's new book, 'Reading the Constitution,' is mentioned as a resource for understanding his perspective on constitutional interpretation and the role of the Court.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of discussion in the interview with Ronna McDaniel?

    -The main topic of discussion in the interview with Ronna McDaniel is her stepping down as RNC Chair, her views on the 2020 election, the Republican Party's stance on various issues, and her thoughts on the current political climate.

  • What was Ronna McDaniel's response to the claim that she enabled Donald Trump to spread election lies?

    -Ronna McDaniel defended her actions by stating that there were genuine concerns about the 2020 election at the time, but she also acknowledged that Joe Biden is the legitimate President and that the election was certified and done.

  • How did Ronna McDaniel address the issue of her credibility after her statements on the 2020 election?

    -Ronna McDaniel argued that she has always acknowledged Biden as the President and that expressing concerns about the election does not negate his legitimacy. She also emphasized her commitment to the Republican Party and her belief in having different viewpoints in the country's political discourse.

  • What was Justice Stephen Breyer's stance on the overturning of Roe v. Wade?

    -Justice Stephen Breyer dissented on the overturning of Roe v. Wade and expressed disappointment in the decision, highlighting the life-altering consequences of such a ruling and the importance of considering the real-world impacts of constitutional interpretations.

  • What did Justice Breyer suggest about the Supreme Court's decision-making process?

    -Justice Breyer suggested that the Supreme Court's decision-making process should not be solely based on the original text of the Constitution but should also consider the real-world consequences of its rulings, emphasizing the importance of understanding the details relevant to important decisions.

  • How did Justice Breyer respond to the question about the potential for a compromise on the Dobbs case?

    -Justice Breyer did not provide a direct answer to the question about a potential compromise on the Dobbs case. He stated that he usually hopes for compromise but did not want to speculate or make news about the case.

  • What was the context behind the discussion on the Supreme Court's handling of the 2020 election cases?

    -The context behind the discussion on the Supreme Court's handling of the 2020 election cases was the then-upcoming arguments about Donald Trump's claim to be immune from criminal prosecution for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The discussion revolved around the Court's decision to take up the case and the potential impact on public trust in the Court.

  • What was the panel's reaction to Ronna McDaniel's interview?

    -The panel expressed mixed reactions to Ronna McDaniel's interview. Some panelists questioned her credibility and motives, given her role as a paid contributor to NBC News and her past actions as RNC Chair. Others discussed the importance of ideological diversity in media and the challenges of navigating political interviews.

  • What did the panel discuss regarding the future of the Supreme Court and its legitimacy?

    -The panel discussed the decreasing public trust in the Supreme Court, the hyperpartisan politics affecting its confirmation process, and the historical context of Justice Breyer's own confirmation, which was less partisan than recent ones. They also touched on the potential benefits of term limits for Supreme Court Justices.

  • How did Justice Breyer view the impact of the Dobbs decision?

    -Justice Breyer anticipated that the Dobbs decision would lead to a number of issues coming to the courts, particularly due to the overruling of Roe v. Wade. He expressed his belief that the decision had real-world consequences and was a significant departure from the Court's previous interpretations of the Constitution.

  • What was Justice Breyer's perspective on the retirement of Supreme Court Justices?

    -Justice Breyer acknowledged that deciding to retire from the Supreme Court is a difficult decision. He mentioned considering the right time to retire, the opportunity for others to serve, and the challenges of making tough decisions at an advanced age.

Outlines

00:00

💰 Campaign Finances and Legal Bills

The paragraph discusses the financial aspects of the 2024 campaign, highlighting President Biden's cash advantage over Donald Trump. It mentions Trump's legal bills and his request for campaign donors to help pay them. The conversation shifts to Ronna McDaniel, former RNC chair, discussing the Republican Party's financial strategy and the impact of Trump's legal issues on the campaign.

05:01

🗳️ Election Integrity and RNC's Role

This section delves into the former President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and the stress this has placed on American institutions. It includes an exclusive interview with former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, discussing the weight of considering cases central to the presidential election. The conversation also touches on the Supreme Court's decision on Trump's immunity and prosecution for his election subversion efforts.

10:01

🎙️ Ronna McDaniel's Interview and RNC's Strategy

In this segment, Ronna McDaniel shares insights into her decision to step down as RNC chair, the tension during the debates, and her stance on Trump's potential return as the party's nominee. McDaniel discusses the fundraising agreement between the Trump campaign and the RNC, and her views on using donations to pay Trump's legal bills. She also addresses criticisms about her tenure as RNC chair.

15:02

🚨 Trump's January 6th Remarks and McDaniel's Response

The paragraph focuses on the aftermath of the 2020 election, particularly the events of January 6th. McDaniel strongly condemns the violence that occurred, stating it does not represent the Republican Party. She discusses Trump's comments about freeing those convicted of crimes related to January 6th and her disagreement with such a stance. McDaniel emphasizes the importance of not attacking the Capitol and the necessity of denouncing the events of that day.

20:03

📞 The Controversial Phone Call and Election Certification

This section details a controversial phone call involving Ronna McDaniel and Donald Trump, urging Michigan officials not to certify the election results. McDaniel defends her actions by stating her concern was for the safety of the officials after they faced threats and intimidation. She clarifies her position on the election certification process and the need for audits, while also expressing regret for the threats faced by election workers.

25:04

🤝 Bipartisanship and the Future of the RNC

The discussion here revolves around the challenges of bipartisanship and the future direction of the Republican Party. McDaniel talks about the importance of different viewpoints and the need for respectful dialogue. She also addresses criticisms of her credibility and the perception that she enabled Trump's election lies. McDaniel emphasizes her commitment to the country and her desire for open conversations in the political discourse.

30:04

👨‍⚖️ Justice Breyer on Interpreting the Constitution

Justice Stephen Breyer shares his views on interpreting the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of considering the real-world consequences of rulings. He discusses the change in how people interpret legal documents and the potential impact of the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade. Breyer also touches on the role of the Supreme Court in the current political climate and the importance of public trust in the institution.

35:09

📚 Justice Breyer's New Book and Legal Philosophy

Justice Breyer discusses his new book, which advocates for looking beyond the original text of the Constitution to understand the intentions behind it. He explains why he believes this approach is crucial for interpreting the law and making decisions. The conversation also includes Breyer's thoughts on the potential for compromise in legal decisions and his views on the leak of the Dobbs draft opinion.

40:10

🎖️ Justice Breyer's Tenure and Retirement

In this part, Justice Breyer reflects on his tenure on the Supreme Court and the decision to retire. He discusses the difficulty of leaving the Court and the considerations that went into his decision. Breyer also talks about the potential benefits of having term limits for Supreme Court Justices and his belief that such a system would not be harmful.

45:11

🏛️ The Changing Confirmation Process and Public Trust

The panelists discuss the changing landscape of Supreme Court nominations, noting the increasing politicization and the impact on public trust. They reflect on Justice Breyer's confirmation process, which was bipartisan, and contrast it with more recent, highly partisan confirmations. The conversation highlights the need for reform in the confirmation process to preserve the integrity of the judiciary.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and has the ultimate jurisdiction over all federal and state courts. In the video, former Justice Stephen Breyer discusses his time on the Supreme Court and the importance of understanding the details relevant to important decisions made by the Court.

💡Roe v. Wade

Roe v. Wade is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court that established a woman's legal right to have an abortion. The video discusses the overturning of this decision in the Dobbs case, which has significant implications for reproductive rights in the United States.

💡Originalism

Originalism is a legal philosophy that advocates for interpreting the Constitution based on its original meaning or the intent of its framers. In the video, Justice Breyer critiques the approach of originalism, arguing that it is not always practical or sufficient for understanding the Constitution's application to modern issues.

💡Compromise

In the context of the video, a compromise refers to the possibility of finding a middle ground or agreement in legal decisions, particularly in contentious cases like those involving abortion rights. Justice Breyer mentions his hope for compromise, indicating a preference for solutions that balance competing interests and rights.

💡Leak

A leak refers to the unauthorized disclosure of information, typically kept confidential or secret. In the video, the discussion revolves around the leak of the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, which had significant repercussions for the Supreme Court's operations and the trust in the institution.

💡Retirement

In the context of the video, retirement refers to Justice Breyer's decision to step down from the Supreme Court, which he describes as a difficult choice influenced by various factors, including age and the desire to allow others the opportunity to serve.

💡Ideological Balance

Ideological balance refers to the even distribution of political or philosophical views within a group or institution, such as the Supreme Court. In the video, Justice Breyer suggests that considerations of ideological balance were partly behind his decision to retire.

💡Confirmation Process

The confirmation process is the series of steps taken to appoint a justice to the Supreme Court, including nomination by the President and review by the Senate. The video highlights the increasing partisanship in this process and contrasts it with the bipartisan support for Justice Breyer's appointment in 1994.

💡Public Trust

Public trust refers to the confidence and faith that the public has in an institution or system. In the video, Justice Breyer expresses concern about the erosion of public trust in the Supreme Court, which he attributes in part to the politicization of the confirmation process and the impact of leaks.

💡Partisan Politics

Partisan politics refers to the practice of promoting the policies and interests of a particular political party, often to the exclusion of the opposition. The video script indicates a concern about the increasing influence of partisan politics on the Supreme Court, particularly in the context of nominations and confirmations.

Highlights

President Biden has a cash advantage in the 2024 campaign, contrasting with Donald Trump's lead in the polls.

Trump's legal bills are mounting, and he is urging campaign donors to help pay them.

Ronna McDaniel, the former RNC chair, discusses the tension and friction during the debate process.

McDaniel implies she was pushed out of her role due to Trump's desire to have his allies take over.

The RNC is now fully formed in Trump's image, with Trump's daughter-in-law and a new fundraiser benefiting his campaign and legal bills.

McDaniel defends the RNC's role in the 2020 election and the subsequent legal battles.

Justice Stephen Breyer speaks out about the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and his thoughts on potential compromises.

Breyer's retirement from the Supreme Court and his perspectives on the nomination process and the Court's public trust.

The panel discusses the credibility of Ronna McDaniel as a contributor to NBC News and her past actions as RNC chair.

Justice Breyer's views on the importance of understanding the real-world consequences of Supreme Court rulings.

The discussion on whether the public deserves to know the verdict in the election subversion case before November.

Breyer's thoughts on the potential for future overturning of Dobbs and the impact of the leaked draft opinion.

The historical context of Supreme Court nominations and the changing political landscape.

Justice Breyer's suggestions for term limits on Supreme Court Justices to avoid politicization.

The challenges of deciding to retire from the Supreme Court and the considerations involved.

Justice Breyer's reflections on his time at the Supreme Court and the difficulty of stepping down.

The panel's insights into the future of the Supreme Court and the implications of Justice Breyer's retirement.

The importance of public trust in the Supreme Court and the impact of recent events on this trust.

Transcripts

00:09

>>> THIS SUNDAY, PARTY TAKEOVER.

00:12

>>> THIS SUNDAY, PARTY TAKEOVER.

00:13

DONALD TRUMP MAY BE LEADING IN

00:14

THE POLLS, BUT IT'S PRESIDENT

00:16

BIDEN WHO HAS THE CASH ADVANTAGE

00:18

IN THE 2024 CAMPAIGN.

00:19

>> WE HAVE TO RAISE A LOT OF

00:21

MONEY.

00:22

>> AS HIS LEGAL BILLS MOUNT,

00:25

TRUMP WANTS CAMPAIGN DONORS TO

00:27

HELP PAY THEM.

00:28

>> WE HAVE A LOT OF CASH AND WE

00:29

HAVE A GREAT COMPANY, BUT THEY

00:31

WANT TO TAKE IT AWAY.

00:32

THEY'D LIKE TO TAKE THE CASH

00:34

AWAY SO I CAN'T USE IT ON THE

00:35

CAMPAIGN.

00:36

>> IS THAT A WINNING STRATEGY?

00:38

I'LL SPEAK WITH RONNA McDANIEL.

00:40

THE FORMER CHAIRWOMAN OF THE

00:42

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE.

00:43

PLUS, SUPREME DECISIONS.

00:45

FORMER SUPREME COURT JUSTICE

00:46

STEPHEN BREYER SPEAKS OUT ABOUT

00:48

THE DECISION TO OVERTURN ROE V.

00:50

WADE.

00:50

>> DID YOU THINK THAT A

00:53

COMPROMISE WAS POSSIBLE BEFORE

00:55

THE WEEK AROUND 15 WEEKS?

00:57

>> I USUALLY HOPE FOR

00:58

COMPROMISE.

00:59

>> AND HIS DECISION TO STEP DOWN

01:01

FROM THE COURT.

01:03

>> IF IT WASN'T FOR YOU TO

01:05

DECIDE TO RETIRE.

01:06

>> JOINING ME FOR INSIGHT AND

01:08

ANALYSIS ARE, NBC NEWS CHIEF

01:10

POLITICAL ANALYST CHUCK TODD.

01:12

KIMBERLY ATKINS STOHR, SENIOR

01:14

OPINION WRITER FOR THE BOSTON

01:18

GLOBE AND STEPHEN HAYES, EDITOR

01:20

OF THE DISPATCH.

01:21

WELL

01:22

WELCOME TO SUNDAY.

01:24

IT'S MEET THE PRESS".

01:25

>> FROM NBC NEWS IN WASHINGTON,

01:27

THE LONGEST RUNNING SHOW IN

01:28

TELEVISION HISTORY, THIS IS

01:30

"MEET THE PRESS" WITH KRISTEN

01:32

WELKER.

01:33

>>> GOOD SUNDAY MORNING.

01:35

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP'S

01:36

EFFORT TO OVERTURN THE 2020

01:38

ELECTION IS PUTTING AN

01:40

UNPRECEDENTED STRESS TEST ON

01:42

AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS AHEAD OF

01:44

THE 2024 ELECTION.

01:46

WITH A SUPREME COURT ALREADY

01:47

DECIDING TRUMP CAN REMAIN ON THE

01:50

BALLOT IN COLORADO, NOW WEIGHING

01:51

WHETHER HE HAS TOTAL IMMUNITY

01:53

AND PROSECUTION FOR HIS ELECTION

01:55

SUBVERSION EFFORTS, THIS WEEK I

01:57

SPOKE EXCLUSIVELY WITH FORMER

01:58

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE STEPHEN

02:01

BREYER WHERE I ASKED HIM ABOUT

02:05

THE WEIGHT A JUSTICE FIELDS WHEN

02:07

CONSIDERING THESE CASES THAT

02:08

HAVE BECOME CENTRAL TO THE

02:09

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

02:10

>> CAN YOU DESCRIBE THE WEIGHT

02:12

THAT YOU FELT, THAT ONE FEELS AS

02:16

A JUSTICE WHEN YOU ARE PRESENTED

02:19

WITH A CASE OF A PRESIDENTIAL

02:20

ELECTION.

02:21

>> THIS IS NOT JUST AN ELECTION.

02:25

IMAGINE YOU WERE ON THE COURT

02:27

THAT DECIDED BROWN VERSUS BOARD

02:28

OF EDUCATION.

02:29

IMAGINE THAT YOU WERE ON THE

02:33

COURT THAT HAD TO DECIDE, WELL,

02:35

FOR EXAMPLE, WHETHER PRESIDENT

02:38

NIXON WAS IMMUNE FROM GIVING --

02:41

DIDN'T HAVE TO TURN THE TAPES

02:44

OVER TO R.G. COX.

02:45

IMAGINE THAT.

02:46

>> MORE OF MY INTERVIEW WITH

02:48

JUSTICE BREYER IS COMING UP, BUT

02:50

FIRST, I'LL BE JOINED BY FORMER

02:53

RNC CHAIR RONNA McDANIEL IN HER

02:55

FIRST INTERVIEW SINCE STEPPING

02:56

DOWN AS PARTY CHAIR.

02:57

IN FULL DISCLOSURE TO OUR

02:59

VIEWERS, THIS INTERVIEW WAS

03:00

SCHEDULED WEEKS BEFORE IT WAS

03:02

ANNOUNCED THAT McDANIEL HAD

03:04

BECOME A PAID NBC NEWS

03:05

CONTRIBUTOR.

03:06

THIS WILL BE A NEWS INTERVIEW,

03:08

AND I WAS NOT INVOLVED IN HER

03:09

HIRING.

03:11

THIS WEEK WE EARN WELLEDLEARNED

03:14

TRUMP'S GRIP ON THE REPUBLICAN

03:17

PARTY IS IMPACTING THE GOP'S

03:18

BOTTOM LINE.

03:19

IT HAS MORE THAN DOUBLE THE CASH

03:22

OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, WHILE THE

03:25

PRESIDENT HAS SHARPENED HIS

03:27

ATTACKS WITH HIS PREDECESSOR

03:29

OVER HIS MOUNTING LEGAL DEBTS.

03:31

TRUMP HAS A NEW FUNDRAISER WITH

03:33

THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL

03:35

COMMITTEE THAT WILL FILTER

03:37

DONATIONS TO BOTH HIS CAMPAIGN

03:39

AND THE SUPER PAC PAYING HIS

03:42

CAMPAIGN BEFORE THE RNC GETTING

03:43

A CUT.

03:45

WITH MICHAEL WATLEY AND HIS

03:47

DAUGHTER-IN-LAW, LAURA TRUMP,

03:48

THE PARTY IS NOW FULLY FORMED IN

03:50

TRUMP'S IMAGE.

03:51

>> WE ARE GOING TO DETERMINE THE

03:53

FATE OF NOT ONLY THE UNITED

03:55

STATES, BUT OF THE ENTIRE WORLD

03:58

AND THIS BODY, THE RNC, IS GOING

04:01

TO BE THE VANGUARD OF A MOVEMENT

04:06

THAT WILL WORK TIRELESSLY EVERY

04:09

SINGLE DAY TO ELECT OUR NOMINEE

04:11

DONALD J. TRUMP.

04:11

>> WE ARE GOING TO MAKE SURE

04:14

THAT EVERY SINGLE PENNY OF EVERY

04:16

DOLLAR RAISED GOES TOWARDS ONE

04:18

GOAL WHICH IS WINNING.

04:19

>> JOINING ME NOW IS FORMER RNC

04:22

CHAIR RONNA McDANIEL.

04:25

WELCOME BACK TO "MEET THE PRESS"

04:27

THANKS FOR BEING HERE.

04:29

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

04:30

>> LET'S START WITH YOUR

04:32

DECISION TO STEP DOWN AS RNC

04:32

CHAIR.

04:33

IF YOU CAN TAKE ME BEHIND THE

04:36

SCENES A LITTLE BIT.

04:38

WERE YOU PUSHED OUT OF YOUR

04:39

ROLE?

04:41

>> THERE'S NO QUESTION THAT AS

04:43

RNC CHAIR WE HAVE TO REMAIN

04:46

NEUTRAL ANDEE WE HAD DEBATES AND

04:47

THERE WAS TENSION AND FRICTION

04:49

THAT STARTED DURING THAT

04:49

PROCESS.

04:50

IT WAS WELL PLAYED OUT IN THE

04:52

MEDIA, AND I KNEW AT THAT POINT

04:53

WHEN I WAS DOING THAT ROLE AND

04:55

WE WERE GOING TO HAVE DEBATES

04:57

THAT WHEN THE NOMINEE CAME

04:58

FORWARD AND IT WAS LIKELY TO BE

05:00

PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT THEY WOULD

05:01

WANT TO SWITCH, AND THAT'S HIS

05:03

RIGHT AS A NOMINEE.

05:05

>> SO WERE YOU PUSHED OUT BY

05:07

HIM?

05:07

>> HE ABSOLUTELY WANTED ME TO

05:11

MOVE ASIDE AND WANTED MICHAEL

05:13

WHATLEY AND LARA TRUMP TO COME

05:15

IN.

05:16

>> YOU PUT OUT THAT STATEMENT

05:19

EFFECTIVELY CALLING ON NIKKI

05:21

HALEY TO STEP OUT OF THE RACE?

05:23

CAN YOU SAY YOU WERE NEUTRAL?

05:24

>> I CAN'T.

05:25

WE HAD A NEUTRAL PRIMARY AND WE

05:28

HAD DEBATES AND THE DEMOCRATS

05:30

DIDN'T HAVE DEBATES AND NOW THEY

05:33

HAVE RFK JR. AS A THIRD PARTY, I

05:36

THINK THAT'S SO IMPORTANT TO OUR

05:38

PUBLIC DISCOURSE SO YES, I WAS

05:40

NEUTRAL, BUT AS I SAID AT THAT

05:41

TIME THERE WAS NO MATH AND NO

05:43

PATH AND THAT WAS TRUE, AND SO

05:44

WE DID NEED TO CONSOLIDATE

05:46

BEHIND THE NOMINEE AND THAT'S

05:47

WHAT I DID.

05:48

>> YOU TALK ABOUT THE TEPGDZS

05:50

AROUND THE DEBATES.

05:52

WAS THERE A BREAKING POINT WITH

05:53

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP

05:54

AND YOU?

05:56

>> IT WAS A LOT OF TENSION WITH

05:58

THE CAMPAIGN.

05:59

HE REALLY DID NOT FEEL LIKE WE

06:00

SHOULD HAVE DEBATES.

06:01

HE SAID THIS PUBLICLY.

06:03

I GOT A LOT OF PHONE CALLS.

06:05

>> FROM HIM?

06:07

PHONE CALLS FROM TRUMP DIRECTLY.

06:09

>> FROM HIS CAMPAIGN AND I

06:10

TALKED TO HIM DIRECTLY.

06:12

>> YOU SAW SUPPORTERS.

06:13

DON'T GIVE TO THE RNC.

06:15

DON'T HAVE DEBATES.

06:16

LISTEN, THERE ARE A LOT OF

06:17

PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT PRESIDENT

06:19

TRUMP IN OUR PARTY, BUT THERE

06:20

ARE OTHERS WHO DIDN'T AND THEY

06:22

NEEDED TO SEE THAT PROCESS TO

06:23

PLAY OUT TO SAY THIS WAS FAIR,

06:26

MY CANDIDATE WAS GIVEN AN

06:27

OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THE

06:28

AMERICAN PEOPLE.

06:29

THE VOTERS DECIDED, AND THIS IS

06:31

THE NOMINEE, AND BECAUSE WE LET

06:33

THAT PROCESS PLAY OUT HE HAS --

06:35

HE'S THE NOMINEE WITHOUT A THIRD

06:37

PARTY RUNNING AGAINST HIM WHICH

06:38

IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THE

06:39

DEMOCRATS DID.

06:40

>> YOU WERE REPLACED BY DONALD

06:43

TRUMP'S HAND PICKED ALLIES

06:45

INCLUDING HIS DAUGHTER-IN-LAW

06:46

LARA TRUMP AND NOW THERE IS A

06:48

FUND-RAISING AGREEMENT WHICH

06:50

BASICALLY MEANS THE DONATIONS GO

06:51

TO THE SUPER PAC TO PAY FOR HIS

06:54

LEGAL BILLS BEFORE THEY GO TO

06:55

THE RNC.

06:56

IS IT APPROPRIATE FOR DONALD

06:58

TRUMP TO ASK DONORS TO PAY FOR

07:00

HIS LEGAL BILLS.

07:01

>> AS LONG AS THE DONORS KNOW

07:03

THAT THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING.

07:05

IT IS IN THE WATERFALL OF IT.

07:07

IT IS SAVE AMERICA BEFORE THE

07:07

RNC.

07:08

WHAT I ALSO THINK THAT MEANS IS

07:11

THAT THE CAMPAIGNS OR THE RNC IS

07:12

BEING TRUTHFUL WHEN THEY SAY

07:13

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO PAY THE

07:15

LEGAL BILLS AND IT IS GOING TO

07:17

RUN THROUGH THE SAVE AMERICA

07:17

PACT.

07:18

>> ULTIMATELY, THESE DONATIONS

07:20

ARE GOING FIRST TO PAY HIS LEGAL

07:21

BILLS.

07:22

PEOPLE WHO MAY BE STRUGGLING IN

07:24

SOME CASES TO MAKE ENDS MEET, IS

07:26

THERE NOT AN ETHICAL CHALLENGE

07:27

WITH THAT?

07:28

>> IF THEY FEEL TRONGLY TO

07:31

SUPPORT HIS LEGAL BILLS THEN

07:32

THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO,

07:34

AND I THINK HE'S BEING VERY OPEN

07:36

THAT THEY'RE HELPING WITH HIS

07:38

LEGAL BILLS.

07:39

>> YOU PAID $2 MILLION FOR HIS

07:42

LEGAL BILLS WHILE HE WAS STILL

07:43

IN OFFICE.

07:44

DO YOU HAVE REGRETS OF THAT?

07:46

DO YOU THINK IT WAS APPROPRIATE?

07:47

>> AS A FORMER PRESIDENT AND

07:48

SOMEONE WHO RAISED A LOT OF

07:51

MONEY INTO THE RNC, WE PAID LESS THAN $2 MILLION IN LEGAL BILLS

07:53

THAN $2 MILLION IN LEGAL BILLS

07:55

AND WE DIDN'T ONCE HE BECAME A

08:00

NOMINEE OR CANDIDATE WE CUT THAT

08:01

OFF.

08:02

IT'S DIFFERENT WHEN YOU'RE A

08:03

FORMER PRESIDENT THAN WHEN

08:04

YOU'RE A CANDIDATE.

08:05

>> ONE TOLD POLITICO YOU WERE A,

08:08

QUOTE, FAILED CHAIR.

08:09

ANOTHER SAID WE LOST THE SENATE

08:11

AND THE WHITE HOUSE WHIL SHE WAS

08:12

CHAIR.

08:12

DID YOU DESERVE TO STAY ON WITH

08:14

THAT TRACK RECORD, RONNA?

08:16

>> YOU KNOW, I PUSH BACK ON THAT

08:17

VERY HARD.

08:18

THE FACT THAT UNDER MY TIME AS

08:20

CHAIR WE'VE HAD MORE WOMEN IN

08:22

CONGRESS EVER THAN IN THE

08:23

HISTORY OF OUR PARTY, THAT WE'VE

08:25

HAD MORE MINORITY GROWTH IN OUR

08:26

PARTY AND THAT DIDN'T JUST

08:27

HAPPEN.

08:28

I HAD OFFICES OPEN IN BLACK,

08:30

ASIAN, HISPANIC COMMUNITIES THAT

08:32

WE HAD IGNORED AS A PARTY AND WE

08:34

HAVE SEEN GROWTH AS A RESULT,

08:35

WHICH BY THE WAY, WE'RE SEEING

08:37

IN THIS ELECTION, AS WELL AND

08:38

THEN I'M GOING TO POINT OUT TO

08:39

THIS.

08:40

THE RNC, WE DON'T DO THE

08:43

MESSAGING AND WE DON'T PICK THE

08:44

CANDIDATES.

08:44

WE'RE A TURNOUT.

08:46

IF YOU LOOK AT 2022, JUST 2022,

08:49

WE TURNED OUT 4 MILLION MORE

08:51

REPUBLICANS AND WE WOULD HAVE

08:53

WON THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE BASED

08:54

ON THE TURNOUT.

08:56

WHAT I SAY TO PEOPLE IF WE'RE

08:57

BUILDING THE ROAD THAT ALL OF

09:01

THE CANDIDATES DRIVE ON, AND ONE

09:03

CANDIDATE GOT TO THE FINISH LINE

09:04

THE ROAD ISN'T THE PROBLEM.

09:06

IT'S CANDIDATE TO CANDIDATE.

09:08

I VIEW MY RNC TENURE AS A

09:10

SUCCESS.

09:11

>> LET'S TALK ABOUT THE ELECTION

09:11

NOW.

09:12

DONALD TRUMP SAYS ONE OF HIS

09:14

FIRST ACTS IF HE IS RE-ELECTED

09:16

TO A SECOND TERM WOULD BE,

09:18

QUOTE, TO FREE THOSE CHARGED AND

09:20

CONVICTED OF CRIMES RELATED TO

09:22

JANUARY 6th.

09:23

DO YOU SUPPORT THAT?

09:24

>> I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR.

09:26

THE VIOLENCE THAT HAPPENED ON

09:28

JANUARY 6th IS UNACCEPTABLE.

09:30

IT DOESN'T REPRESENT OUR

09:32

COUNTRY.

09:32

IT CERTAINLY DOES NOT REPRESENT

09:33

MY PARTY.

09:34

WE SHOULD NOT BE ATTACKING THE

09:36

CAPITOL.

09:36

WE SHOULD NOT BE HAVING

09:37

VIOLENCE.

09:38

I SAID IT THAT DAY.

09:40

I PUT A STATEMENT OUT THAT DAY

09:42

THAT THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

09:45

IF YOU ATTACKED OUR CAPITOL AND

09:47

YOU HAVE BEEN CONVICTED THEN

09:48

THAT SHOULD STAY.

09:49

>> SO THEN TO THE QUESTION,

09:52

THOUGH, DO YOU DISAGREE WITH

09:54

TRUMP SAYING THAT HE'LL FREE

09:56

THOSE --

09:57

>> I DO NOT THINK THAT PEOPLE

09:58

WHO COMMITTED VIOLENT ACTS ON

10:00

JANUARY 6th SHOULD BE FREE.

10:01

>> SO YOU DISAGREE.

10:02

HE'S BEEN SAYING THAT FOR

10:03

MONTHS?

10:04

WHY NOT SPEAK OUT EARLIER?

10:06

WHY NOT SPEAK OUT ABOUT THAT

10:07

NOW?

10:07

>> WHEN YOU'RE THE RNC CHAIR YOU

10:10

TAKE ONE FOR THE WHOLE TEAM,

10:11

RIGHT?

10:11

NOW I CAN GET TO BE MORE MYSELF,

10:13

RIGHT?

10:14

THIS IS WHAT I BELIEVE.

10:15

I DON'T THINK VIOLENCE SHOULD BE

10:17

IN OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE,

10:19

REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT, AND I

10:20

DISAGREE WITH THAT.

10:21

I AGREE WITH HIM ON A WHOLE HOST

10:23

OF OTHER THINGS.

10:24

LET'S CLOSE THE BORDER.

10:25

LET'S MAKE SURE WE HAVE GOOD

10:27

INCOMES FOR PEOPLE.

10:28

LET'S MAKE SURE WE DO A LOT OF

10:30

GREAT THING, BUT ON THAT POINT I

10:32

DON'T THINK WE SHOULD BE FREEING

10:33

PEOPLE WHO VIOLENTLY ATTACKED

10:35

CAPITOL HILL POLICE OFFICERS AND

10:36

ATTACKED THE CAPITOL.

10:38

>> RONNA, THAT IS SUCH A

10:39

FUNDAMENTAL POINT.

10:41

SUCH A FUNDAMENTAL POINT TO OUR

10:43

DEMOCRACY.

10:44

YOU SAY YOU STILL SUPPORT HIM

10:45

AND YOU WILL VOTE FOR HIM BASED

10:47

ON THAT.

10:48

WHAT DO YOU SAY TO THOSE WHO

10:51

HEAR THAT ANSWER AND FEEL IT'S

10:53

HYPOCRITICAL TO VOTE ON HIM.

10:54

>> I THINK WE HAVE TO MAKE A

10:55

CHOICE, RIGHT?

10:56

EVERYBODY IS LOOKING AT THEIR

10:58

CANDIDATES AND THEY MAY SAY I

11:00

DON'T LOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT

11:02

THIS, I DISAGREE WITH THIS AND I

11:04

DON'T LIKE WHEN WHEN THEY SAY

11:05

THIS.

11:05

FOR ME WHEN I LOOK AT MY STATE

11:07

OF MICHIGAN AND THE COST OF

11:09

FOOD, THE COST OF RENT, THE COST

11:12

OF INSURANCE THAT I FEEL LESS

11:13

SAFE.

11:14

CRIME IS ON THE RISE, THAT WE'RE

11:17

SEEING FENTANYL COME ACROSS OUR

11:19

BORDER AND OPEN BORDER, I DON'T

11:20

THINK THERE'S ANY CHOICE, BUT TO

11:22

VOTE FOR THE REPUBLICAN EVEN

11:23

THOUGH YOU MAY HAVE

11:24

DISAGREEMENTS, IT'S HIM ORRED

11:26

BIEN AND THAT'S THE CHOICE.

11:29

>> JUST TO BE CLEAR, CRIME SHOWS

11:32

IT'S GOING DOWN IN MAJOR CITIES

11:34

AND THE FENTANYL IS COMING OVER

11:35

LEGAL PORTS OF ENTRY.

11:37

LET ME GET TO THIS NEXT

11:38

QUESTION.

11:39

MITCH McCONNELL SAID DONALD

11:41

TRUMP WAS PRACTICALLY AND

11:43

MORALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE

11:44

ATTACK ON THE CAPITOL.

11:45

WOULD YOU AGREE WITH HIM?

11:47

>> I DON'T THINK HE WANTED THAT

11:48

ATTACK ON THE CAPITOL, BUT I

11:50

WILL SAY THAT ATTACK IS A DARK

11:52

DAY IN OUR HISTORY.

11:54

THERE IS NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF

11:56

ABOUT THAT DAY AND NOTHING TO

11:57

LOOK BACK ON THAT'S GOOD.

11:59

IT'S CHANGED OUR WHOLE COUNTRY.

12:00

SO I CONDEMN WHAT HAPPENED ON

12:02

JANUARY 6th TO I THINK HE WANTED

12:04

THAT TO HAPPEN OR PUSHED THAT TO

12:05

HAPPEN?

12:05

I DON'T.

12:07

>> NOW HE SEEMS TO BE VERY PROUD

12:09

ABOUT IT.

12:10

HE CALLS IT A BEAUTIFUL DAY.

12:13

A AGAIN, HE TALKS ABOUT FREEING

12:17

THOSE WHO WERE CONVICTED.

12:20

IF YOU ASKED THOSE CONVICTED

12:22

THEY SAY THEY WERE THERE BECAUSE

12:23

HE ASKED THEM TO BE THERE.

12:25

>> THE RNC WAS NOT THERE ON

12:26

JANUARY 6th.

12:27

>> WHAT ABOUT TRUMP?

12:30

MITCH McCONNELL SAID DONALD

12:31

TRUMP WAS PRACTICALLY AND

12:33

MORALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE

12:34

ATTACK ON THE CAPITOL.

12:35

WAS HE?

12:36

>> I DON'T THINK HE WANTED THE

12:39

ATTACK ON THE CAPITOL.

12:40

>> WAS HE RESPONSIBLE?

12:42

>> WHEN I SAY THAT, I DON'T SAY

12:44

HE WANTED THAT TO HAPPEN, BUT I

12:46

DO THINK IT WAS A TERRIBLE DAY

12:48

AND IT'S NOT SOMETHING TO BE

12:49

CELEBRATED AND IT WASN'T A

12:50

BEAUTIFUL DAY.

12:51

THE RNC WAS NOT THERE.

12:52

WE DID NOT COORDINATE.

12:53

WE WERE NOT PART OF PLANNING

12:55

THAT DAY, BUT I ALSO TAKE IT A

12:57

DIFFERENT WAY, KRISTEN.

12:59

WHEN MY KIDS SEE THIS ON THE

13:01

INTERNET AND THEY SEE ALL THESE

13:03

FLAGS AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE

13:05

REPUBLICAN PARTY IS ALL OF THIS,

13:06

IT CHANGES THEM.

13:08

THEY SAY, MOM, WHAT IS GOING ON?

13:10

IT'S FRIGHTENING.

13:11

THIS IS A DARK DAY IN OUR

13:13

HISTORY AND WE CAN NEVER BACK

13:14

AWAY FROM THE FACT THAT WE

13:16

SHOULD ALL BE CONDEMNING THE

13:17

EVENTS OF JANUARY 6th.

13:18

>> I WANT TO TURN NOW TO YOUR

13:20

ACTIONS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE

13:21

2020 ELECTION.

13:22

>> SURE.

13:23

>> ON NOVEMBER 17th YOU AND

13:26

DONALD TRUMP WERE RECORDED

13:28

PUSHING TWO REPUBLICAN MICHIGAN

13:30

OFFICIALS -- ELECTION OFFICIALS

13:31

NOT TO CERTIFY THE RESULTS OF

13:33

THE ELECTION AND ON THE CALL

13:34

YOU'RE RECORDED AS SAYING,

13:35

QUOTE, IF YOU CAN GO HOME

13:37

TONIGHT DO NOT SIGN IT.

13:39

WE WILL GET YOU ATTORNEYS.

13:41

DO YOU HAVE REGRETS ABOUT THAT

13:42

PHONE CALL IN YOUR --

13:43

>> I AM SO GLAD YOU ASKED ME

13:45

ABOUT THIS BECAUSE I'VE NEVER

13:47

HAD A CHANCE TO RESPOND TO THIS,

13:48

AND IF YOU KNOW THE COURSE OF

13:50

WHAT HAPPENED THAT NIGHT, THESE

13:51

TWO INDIVIDUALS WENT INTO A

13:52

HEARING.

13:53

THEY VOTED NO.

13:54

THEY DIDN'T VOTE NOT TO CERTIFY.

13:56

THEY SAID WE WANT AN AUDIT.

13:58

THERE WERE SOME PROBLEMS IN

14:00

WAYNE COUNTY.

14:01

THEY'VE BEEN CONSISTENT AND WELL

14:02

DOCUMENTED OVER SUBSEQUENT

14:03

ELECTIONS AND AS CANVASSERS WE

14:05

THINK WE SHOULD HAVE AN AUDIT.

14:07

THAT'S ALL THEY ASKED FOR.

14:09

ONCE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED,

14:11

THEY WERE CALLED SUCH VICIOUS

14:13

NAMES, SUCH VILE NAMES, FAMILY

14:15

MEMBERS ARE BEING THREATENED

14:17

THAT THEY CHANGED THEIR VOTE AND

14:19

THEY LEFT SHAKEN AND I DID CALL

14:22

THEM AND SAY NOBODY, AND I THINK

14:23

WE SHOULD AGREE ON THIS AS

14:25

REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS,

14:26

NOBODY SHOULD BE THREATENED OR

14:28

BULLIED OR PUSHED TO CHANGE A

14:29

VOTE AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED TO

14:31

THEM, AND I WANT TO THE FINISH

14:32

BY SAYING OUR CALL THAT NIGHT

14:34

WAS TO SAY ARE YOU OKAY?

14:36

THAT'S MY RECOLLECTION.

14:37

IT WAS THREE AND A HALF YEARS

14:38

AGO.

14:39

THESE ARE PEOPLE I KNEW.

14:40

I LIVE IN WAYNE COUNTY.

14:41

ARE YOU OKAY?

14:42

ARE YOU ALL RIGHT?

14:44

VOTE YOUR CONSCIENCE, NOT

14:46

PUSHING THEM TO DO ANYTHING AND

14:49

THEN LET ME ADD ONE OTHER THING,

14:51

SHE WAS THREATENED TO SUCH A

14:54

DEGREE, MONICA, THAT SOMEBODY'S

14:55

GONE TO JAIL.

14:56

I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THE THREATS

14:59

THAT SHE HAD, BUT WE CAN'T AS

15:02

PARTIES SAY WE SHOULDN'T BE

15:03

ATTACKING ELECTION WORKERS AND

15:05

ELECTION WORKERS NEED TO BE SAFE

15:07

AND WHEN IT HAPPENS TO

15:09

REPUBLICANS IGNORE IT AND ONLY

15:11

REPORT IT WHEN IT HAPPENS TO

15:12

DEMOCRATS.

15:13

SOMEONE WENT TO JAIL FOR THESE

15:14

ATTACKS.

15:15

>> I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE

15:16

SAYING ABOUT THE CONCERNS FOR

15:17

HER SAFETY, BUT YOU GOT ON THE

15:20

PHONE WITH HER, WITH THE THEN

15:22

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

15:23

HOW CAN ANYONE --

15:25

>> SAYING YOU SHOULD NOT BE

15:27

BULLIED TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE.

15:28

>> YOU SAID DO NOT SIGN IT.

15:30

IF YOU CAN GO HOME TONIGHT DO

15:33

NOT SIGN IT, HOW CAN PEOPLE SAY

15:35

IT'S ANYTHING OTHER THAN A

15:36

PRESSURE CAMPAIGN.

15:37

>> THE PRESSURE WAS PUT ON THEM

15:39

AFTER THE HOURS AND HOURS OF

15:40

THREATS AND ABUSE THEY WERE

15:42

RECEIVING THAT COERCED THEM TO

15:43

CHANGE THEIR VOTE AND THEY

15:44

SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH

15:45

THAT.

15:45

>> BUT IF THEY'RE ON THE PHONE

15:46

WITH YOU AND DONALD TRUMP WHO

15:47

WAS THEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE

15:48

UNITED STATES --

15:49

>> I WAS NOT TELLING -- WHAT I'M

15:53

SAYING IS I SUPPORT YOU VOTING

15:55

YOUR CONSCIENCE.

15:56

>> DO YOU REGRET MAKING THAT

15:57

PHONE CALL, RONNA?

15:58

>> I REGRET THE FACT THAT PEOPLE

16:00

ARE BEING THREATENED FOR DOING

16:01

THEIR JOB IN THIS COUNTRY.

16:03

I THINK IT'S WRONG TO SAY I WANT

16:05

A SIMPLE AUDIT AND TO HAVE YOUR

16:07

FAMILY BE THREATENED, YOUR

16:09

DAUGHTER BE THREATENED, YOUR

16:11

LIVELIHOOD BE THREATENED, BEING

16:12

CALLED RACIST.

16:13

GO LOOK AT THE TRANSCRYPTS AND

16:15

THIS IS THE ONE THING WE CAN'T

16:17

HAVE ONE STANDARD FOR DEMOCRATS

16:19

AND NOT REPUBLICAN.

16:21

>> UNDERSTOOD.

16:22

RONNA, ULTIMATELY, THERE WERE

16:24

250 AUDITS AND THEY NEVER FOUND

16:26

THERE WAS ANY CORRUPTION.

16:27

DID YOU NOT HAVE A

16:29

RESPONSIBILITY AS RNC CHAIR TO

16:32

SAY BEFORE JANUARY 6th THE

16:34

ELECTION IS NOT RIGGED THAT

16:36

DONALD TRUMP LOST GIVEN THAT

16:38

THERE WERE AUDITS AND GIVEN THAT

16:40

THERE WERE MORE THAN 60 COURT

16:42

CASES THAT OCCURRED ALL ACROSS

16:43

THE COUNTRY AND THAT DONALD

16:44

TRUMP LOST.

16:45

>> THE REALITY IS JOE BIDEN WON.

16:47

HE'S THE PRESIDENT.

16:48

HE'S THE LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT.

16:49

I HAVE ALWAYS SAID, AND I

16:52

CONTINUE TO SAY THERE WERE

16:54

ISSUES IN 2020.

16:55

I BELIEVE BOTH CAN BE TRUE.

16:57

YOU CAN SAY MASSIVE LAWS WERE

16:59

CHANGED AND THEY WERE CHANGED

17:00

THROUGH COURTS OR THROUGH

17:02

SECRETARIES OF STATE AND NOT

17:03

THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

17:04

IN THE NAME OF THE PANDEMIC THAT

17:07

TOOK AWAY SAFEGUARDS TO THE

17:08

ELECTION.

17:08

>> BUT YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THOSE DID

17:10

NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL IN ANY WAY

17:13

OF OVERTURNING ANY ELECTION.

17:15

>> IN NOVEMBER, WHICH BY THE

17:17

WAY, IS WHEN THAT CALL TOOK

17:18

PLACE IN NOVEMBER.

17:19

THE ELECTION HAPPENS IN

17:20

NOVEMBER.

17:20

WE ARE GETTING SO MUCH INCOMING.

17:23

WE HAVE A JOB TO SAY THIS WAS

17:25

DONE CORRECTLY, AND I'LL JUST

17:28

FINISH ABOUT WAYNE COUNTY.

17:28

>> YEAH.

17:29

>> THERE WERE PRECINCTS THAT

17:30

DIDN'T ALIGN.

17:31

THAT'S A FACT.

17:32

THAT'S NOT PROPAGANDA.

17:36

THAT'S FACT SO WHY CAN'T YOU SAY

17:39

HEY, LISTEN, THESE PRECINCTS

17:40

AREN'T ALIGNING.

17:41

LET'S TAKE A LOOK UNDER THE

17:41

HOOD.

17:42

>> YOU JUST SAID JOE BIDEN IS

17:44

THE LEGITIMATE RE-ELECTED

17:45

PRESIDENT AND THIS IS THE FIRST

17:47

TIME YOU HAVE SAID THIS.

17:47

>> IT'S NOT.

17:48

I SAID IT MANY TIMES.

17:49

>> THIS IS WHAT YOU SAID A YEAR

17:51

AGO TO CHRIS WALLACE.

17:52

I WANT TO PLAY YOU WHAT YOU

17:53

SAID.

17:53

>> ARE YOU SAYING AS THE CHAIR

17:55

OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT YOU

17:58

STILL HAVE QUESTIONS AS TO

18:00

WHETHER OR NOT JOE BIDEN WAS

18:02

DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.

18:03

>> JOE BIDEN IS PRESIDENT.

18:05

>> DO YOU THINK HE WON THE

18:06

ELECTION?

18:07

>> I THINK THERE WERE LOTS OF

18:10

PROBLEMS WITHENT TW 20.

18:12

>> ULTIMATELY HE WON THE

18:14

ELECTION, BUT THERE WERE LOTS OF

18:15

PROBLEMS WITH THE 2020 ELECTION.

18:16

>> AND THAT'S FAIR.

18:18

>> I DON'T THINK HE WON IT FAIR.

18:19

I DON'T.

18:19

I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THAT.

18:22

>> YOU DIDN'T SAY HE WON IT FAIR

18:23

AT THAT POINT.

18:26

CAN YOU SAY THAT, DID JOE BIDEN

18:28

WIN IT FAIR AND SQUARE?

18:30

>> FAIR AND SQUARE.

18:32

IT'S CERTIFIED AND DONE.

18:33

WHY HAS IT TAKEN YOU UNTIL NOW

18:35

TO SAY THAT?

18:36

WHY HAS IT TAKEN YOU UNTIL NOW

18:37

TO SAY THAT?

18:38

>> I'M GOING TO PUSH BACK A

18:40

LITTLE BECAUSE I DO THINK IT'S

18:41

FAIR TO SAY THERE WERE PROBLEMS

18:43

IN 2020 AND TO SAY THAT DOES NOT

18:46

MEAN HE'S NOT LEGITIMATE.

18:47

>> IT SUGGESTS THAT THERE WAS

18:48

SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE

18:49

ELECTION AND YOU KNOW THE

18:52

ELECTION WAS THE MOST HEAVILY

18:55

SCRUTINIZED AND CHRIS KREBS SAID

18:56

IT WAS THE MOST SECURE ELECTION

18:57

IN MODERN HISTORY THAT SUGGESTS

18:59

STILL THAT YOU'RE GIVING

19:00

CREDENCE TO THESE ALLEGATIONS.

19:01

>> WHEN YOU HAVE STATES LIKE

19:04

PENNSYLVANIA GO FROM 260,000

19:06

MAIL-IN BALLOTS TO 2.6 MILLION

19:08

SAYING, YOU KNOW WHAT?

19:10

WHEN YOU GET RID OF I.D. FOR ALL

19:12

MAIL-IN BALLOTS THAT'S A

19:13

CONCERN.

19:14

WE SHOULD ALL BE CONCERNED ABOUT

19:16

THE CARE, CUSTODY, INTEGRITY OF

19:17

EVERY BALLOT AND THAT'S ALL I'M

19:18

SAYING AND THIS IS A VIEWPOINT

19:20

OF A LOT OF REPUBLICANS AND THEY

19:22

THINK JOE BIDEN'S THE PRESIDENT,

19:23

BUT THEY ALSO THINK THERE WERE

19:25

PROBLEMS AND BOTH CAN BE TRUE.

19:26

>> EVEN THE SUPREME COURT,

19:28

RONNA, DIDN'T TAKE UP CONCERNS

19:30

ABOUT THE ELECTION RESULTS IN

19:31

PENNSYLVANIA AND THE SLEW OF

19:33

OTHER STATES.

19:35

LET ME JUST STICK TO, THOUGH, I

19:38

WANT TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW YOU TO

19:41

ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR

19:41

ROLE.

19:42

THE RNC HELPS THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN

19:46

ASSEMBLE ELECTORS IN MICHIGAN

19:47

AND PROVIDE A PLATFORM FOR TRUMP

19:49

LAWYERS TO HOLD THE NEWS

19:50

CONFERENCE WITH RUDY GIULIANI

19:52

ALING A GLOBAL CONSPIRACY TO RIG

19:54

THE ELECTION AGAINST TRUMP AND

19:55

YOU YOURSELF CALLED THE ELECTION

19:57

RIGGED MULTIPLE TIMES.

19:58

DID YOU ENABLE DONALD TRUMP TO

19:59

SPREAD ELECTION LIES?

20:00

>> LET'S GO BACK TO TIME.

20:02

>> DID YOU?

20:04

>> INITIALLY IN NOVEMBER OF 2020

20:07

THERE WERE CONCERNS EVERYWHERE.

20:09

IMAGINE YOU SAW VIDEOS BEING PUT

20:10

OUT.

20:11

ALL TYPES OF THINGS.

20:13

YOU HAVE TO TRACK THAT DOWN.

20:15

SO WHERE I WAS IN 2020 AND THE

20:18

QUOTES THAT ARE BEING TAKEN FROM

20:21

A VERY LONG TIME AGO.

20:22

THREE AND A HALF YEARS AGO TO

20:24

WHERE I AM TODAY YOU HAVE TO

20:25

ALLOW THE PROCESS TO PLAY OUT,

20:27

AND I THINK IT IS FAIR TO SAY

20:29

THERE WERE CONCERNS THEN, BUT

20:31

NO, BIDEN IS THE PRESIDENT AND

20:33

WE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD AND THIS

20:34

IS IMPORTANT FOR OUR COUNTRY.

20:37

>> RONNA, I THINK WHAT PEOPLE

20:39

STRUGGLE WITH IS BY THE TIME

20:40

JANUARY 6th HAPPENED ALL OF

20:42

THOSE COURT CASES, MORE THAN 60

20:44

COURT CASE HESS BEEN LITIGATED.

20:47

DONALD TRUMP HAD LOST AND THE

20:48

SUPREME COURT SAID THEY'RE NOT

20:49

GOING TO TAKE UP CONCERNS.

20:51

AS HEAD OF THE RNC DID YOU NOT

20:53

HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO SAY

20:54

JOE BIDEN WON?

20:56

>> I'VE SAID THAT.

20:57

>> AT THE TIME.

20:59

AT THE TIME BEFORE JANUARY 6th

21:00

AND YOU'RE STILL SAYING THAT

21:01

THERE WERE CONCERNS THIS MORNING

21:02

AS YOU SIT HERE.

21:04

>> SAYING THERE ARE CONCERNS

21:05

ABOUT THE ELECTION DOESN'T SAY

21:06

HE DIDN'T WIN AND THAT'S THE

21:08

ONLY THING I'M GOING TO SAY.

21:09

LISTEN, WE ARE IN 78 LAWSUITS

21:11

RIGHT NOW AT THE RNC.

21:13

I'LL GIVE YOU ONE EXAMPLE.

21:15

ONE IS IN MONTANA WITH DEMOCRATS

21:17

SUING TO SAY YOU SHOULD BE

21:19

ALLOWED TO BE REGISTERED TO VOTE

21:21

IN TWO STATES.

21:22

WHY ARE YOU SUING TO ALLOW VOTER

21:25

I.D. TO BE REMOVED IN STATES?

21:26

I DISAGREE WITH THAT.

21:28

>> TO YOU, TO THE PEOPLE THAT

21:31

FEEL THAT YOU ENABLED DONALD

21:33

TRUMP AND HIS LIES ABOUT THE

21:34

ELECTION, DO YOU OWE THE PEOPLE

21:36

AN APOLOGY?

21:36

DO YOU OWE THIS COUNTRY AN

21:38

APOLOGY?

21:38

>> I THINK THE FACT THAT WE

21:40

LOOKED AT THINGS IS WHAT

21:42

DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE AND

21:43

REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE OR ALLOWED

21:44

TO LOOK AFTER ELECTIONS AND SAY

21:46

I WANT TO MAKE SURE THIS IS DONE

21:49

IN A TRANSPARENT AND FAIR WAY,

21:50

AND I CERTAINLY DO NOT AGREE

21:53

WITH VIOLENCE OR ANY ATTACKS ON

21:55

OUR CAPITOL, AND I'M GOING TO BE

21:57

VERY CLEAR THAT IS SOMETHING I

21:59

CONDEMN WHOLEHEARTEDLY.

21:59

>> VERY QUICKLY, RONNA, BEFORE I

22:01

LET YOU GO.

22:02

YOU SEEM TO BE CHANGING YOUR

22:05

TONE AS IT RELATES TO JOE BIDEN

22:07

BEING LEGITIMATELY ELECTED.

22:09

WHY SHOULD VIEWERS, WHY SHOULD

22:11

PEOPLE TRUST OR BELIEVE WHAT

22:12

YOU'RE SAYING.

22:13

>> I DON'T THINK I'M CHANGING MY

22:13

TONE AT ALL.

22:15

>> WHY SHOULD PEOPLE TRUST WHAT

22:16

YOU'RE SAYING RIGHT NOW.

22:17

>> ONE, I WILL SAY THIS,

22:19

KRISTEN, VOTERS RIGHT NOW IN

22:20

THIS COUNTRY ARE GOING TO BE

22:23

MAKING A CHOICE IN NOVEMBER AND

22:25

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT 2020.

22:27

A LOT OF PEOPLE DO.

22:29

A LOT OF PEOPLE SAY IT IS

22:31

FUNDAMENTAL TO THE COUNTRY'S

22:32

DEMOCRACY.

22:32

>> I THINK THEY'RE THINKING

22:34

ABOUT INFLATION, THE BORDER,

22:36

CRIME, THEIR KIDS' SCHOOLING,

22:37

AND I THINK IT'S REALLY

22:38

IMPORTANT.

22:39

I REPRESENT 50% OF THIS COUNTRY,

22:42

WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, TO

22:43

BE ABLE TO HAVE DIFFERENT

22:45

VIEWPOINTS AND SAY I DISAGREE

22:46

WITH THAT VIEWPOINT, BUT IT'S

22:48

IMPORTANT TO HEAR IT AND IT'S

22:49

IMPORTANT TO OUR COUNTRY.

22:51

I AM NOT CHANGING MY TUNE.

22:53

THIS IS WHERE I HAVE BEEN, AND

22:55

RIGHT NOW WE'RE HEADING INTO A

22:57

PIVOTAL ELECTION.

22:58

>> SPEAK TO THE PEOPLE WHO HOLD

23:00

YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR ENABLING

23:02

DONALD TRUMP AND HIS MISTRUTHS,

23:04

HIS LIES ABOUT THE ELECTION.

23:05

WHY SHOULD THEY TRUST YOU WHEN

23:08

THEY SAY THEY DON'T?

23:09

>> I THINK YOU SHOULD TRUST ME.

23:11

I MEAN, I CAN'T -- I CAN'T SPEAK

23:14

TO PEOPLE WHO DON'T TRUST A

23:15

DIFFERENT VOICE.

23:16

I THINK YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO

23:17

HEAR FROM DIFFERENT VOICES AND I

23:18

HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO TALK TO YOU

23:20

ABOUT THE CONCERNS I HAD GOING

23:22

INTO THAT ELECTION, AND I WISH

23:23

THERE WAS MORE OF A DIALOGUE

23:24

FROM THAT, BUT LET ME BE VERY

23:25

CLEAR.

23:25

I LOVE THIS COUNTRY.

23:27

I COME FROM A STATE THAT'S BEEN

23:28

OVERLOOKED.

23:29

I DON'T SEE MY STATE REPRESENTED

23:31

IN A LOT OF NEWS MEDIA.

23:33

I DON'T GO HOME AS CHAIRMAN

23:35

RONNA McDANIEL.

23:36

I'M MOM RONNA McDANIEL.

23:37

I GO TO THE GROCERY STORE AND DO

23:39

ALL THESE THINGS AND I REALLY

23:41

FEEL LIKE IF OUR COUNTRY'S GOING

23:43

TO SURVIVE WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO

23:45

HAVE DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS

23:45

LIKE THIS IN A RESPECTFUL WAY.

23:47

WE NEED MORE OF THAT IN OUR

23:50

COUNTRY, BUT WE ALSO CAN'T GO

23:52

INTO OUR ECHO CHAMBERS AND SAY

23:54

I'LL ONLY LISTEN TO WHAT

23:56

DEMOCRATS HAVE TO SAY AND I'LL

23:57

ONLY LISTEN TO WHAT REPUBLICANS

23:58

HAVE TO SAY.

23:59

LISTEN TO IT AND MAKE YOUR OWN

24:01

OPINION.

24:01

>> RONNA McDANIEL, THANK YOU FOR

24:03

BEING HERE THIS MORNING.

24:04

>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

24:06

>> WHEN WE COME BACK, DONALD TRUMP'S LEGAL BATTLES ARE

24:08

TRUMP'S LEGAL BATTLES ARE TESTING THE LIMITS OF HIS PARTY

24:21

>>> WELCOME BACK.

24:21

>>> WELCOME BACK.

24:22

THE PANEL IS HERE HELP CHUCK

24:25

TODD, NBC NEWS CHIEF MITT CAL

24:26

ANALYST.

24:27

KIMBERLY ATKINS STOHR FROM THE

24:29

BOSTON GLOBE AND STEPHEN HAYES,

24:31

CEO AND EDITOR OF THE DISPATCH

24:33

IMPEACH LET'S DIVE RIGHT IN.

24:34

WHAT ARE YOUR TAKEAWAYS?

24:36

>> LET ME DEAL WITH THE ELEPHANT

24:38

IN THE ROOM.

24:39

I THINK OUR BOSSES OWE YOU AN

24:42

APOLOGY FOR PUTTING YOU IN THIS

24:44

SITUATION.

24:45

I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO BELIEVE.

24:48

SHE IS A PAID CONTRIBUTOR TO NBC

24:49

NEWS.

24:50

SHE DIDN'T WANT TO MESS UP HER

24:52

CONTRACT.

24:53

SHE WANTS US TO BELIEVE THAT SHE

24:56

WAS SPEAKING FOR THE RNC THE RNC

24:59

WAS PAYING FOR.

25:00

SHE HAS CREDIBILITY ISSUES.

25:02

IS SHE SPEAKING FOR HERSELF?

25:04

IS SHE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF WHO

25:05

IS PAYING HER?

25:07

ONCE AT THE RNC SHE DID SAY

25:09

THAT, I'M SPEAKING FOR THE

25:09

PARTY.

25:10

I GET THAT.

25:11

THAT'S PART OF THE JOB SO WHAT

25:13

ABOUT HERE?

25:14

I WILL SAY THIS.

25:16

I THINK YOUR INTERVIEW DID A

25:18

GOOD JOB OF EXPOSING I THINK

25:20

MANY OTHER CONTRADICTIONS, AND

25:21

LOOK, THERE'S A REASON WHY

25:23

THERE'S A LOT OF JOURNALISTS AT

25:25

NBC NEWS UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THIS

25:27

BECAUSE MANY OF OUR PROFESSIONAL

25:29

DEALINGS WITH THE RNC OVER THE

25:31

YEARS HAVE BEEN MET WITH

25:32

GASLIGHTING AND CHARACTER

25:33

ASSASSINATION.

25:34

SO IT IS, YOU KNOW, THAT'S WHERE

25:39

YOU BEGIN HERE AND SO WHEN NBC

25:42

MADE THE DECISION TO GIVE HER

25:45

NBC NEWS' CREDIBILITY,IO YOU

25:46

HAVE TO ASK WHAT DOES SHE BRING

25:48

TO NBC NEWS AND WHEN WE MAKE

25:50

DEALS LIKE THIS, AND I'VE BEEN

25:52

AT THIS COMPANY FOR A LONG TIME

25:54

YOU DO IT FOR ACCESS.

25:56

SOMETIMES IT'S ACCESS TO AN

25:57

AUDIENCE.

25:58

SOMETIMES IT'S ACCESS TO AN

25:59

INDIVIDUAL AND WE CAN HAVE A

26:01

JOURNALIST BEING DEBATE ABOUT

26:02

THAT, AND I'M WILLING TO HAVE

26:05

THAT DEBATE, AND IF YOU HAD TOLD

26:07

ME WE WERE HIRING HER AS A

26:11

TECHNICAL ADVISER FOR THE

26:13

REPUBLICAN CONVENTION THAT WOULD

26:14

BE DEFENSIBLE.

26:15

WE'RE TALKING TO HER, BUT LET'S

26:17

SEE WHAT SHE DOES IN INTERVIEWS

26:18

AND MAYBE VET HER WITH ACTUAL

26:20

JOURNALISTS AND SEE IF IT'S A

26:22

TWO-WAY, WHAT SHE CAN BRING TO

26:23

THE NETWORK.

26:24

SO I DO THINK, UNFORTUNATELY,

26:28

THIS INTERVIEW IS ALWAYS GOING

26:29

TO BE LOOKED THROUGH THE PRISM

26:30

OF WHO IS SHE SPEAKING FOR?

26:33

I THINK YOU DID EVERYTHING YOU

26:34

COULD DO.

26:35

YOU GOT PUT INTO AN IMPOSSIBLE

26:38

SITUATION, BOOKING THIS

26:39

INTERVIEW AND THE RUG WAS PULLED

26:42

OUT FROM UNDER YOU AND SHE'S

26:43

PAID TO SHOW UP.

26:45

IT IS UNFORTUNATE FOR THE

26:46

PROGRAM AND I'M GLAD YOU DID THE

26:49

BEST YOU COULD AND THAT'S WHY WE

26:53

ARE HERE TO BOLSTER.

26:54

>> AS A JOURNALIST AND THE LIAR,

26:57

I THINK ABOUT CREDIBILITY ALL OF

26:58

THE TIME.

26:59

CREDIBILITY OF SOURCES AND

27:00

WITNESSES, AND FOR THE REASONS

27:01

THAT YOU LAID OUT AND ALSO THE

27:03

TIMING THAT SHE'S ONLY HERE

27:05

AFTER SHE GOT OUSTED FROM

27:07

TRUMP'S RNC.

27:08

>> THERE HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTS TO

27:11

BOOK HER AS RNC CHAIR ON THIS

27:13

SHOW FOR YEARS.

27:14

>> HER CREDIBILITY IS COMPLETELY

27:17

SHOT, I HAVE TO DO WHAT MAYA

27:19

ANGELOU SAID I BELIEVE WHAT THEY

27:21

DO AND NOT WHAT THEY SAID, I

27:24

KNOW THAT SHE HABITUALLY JOINED

27:27

TRUMP IN ATTACKING MEMBERS OF

27:28

THE PRESS INCLUDING THIS NETWORK

27:29

IN A WAY THAT PUT JOURNALISTS AT

27:31

RISK, IN DANGER, AND WE DO KNOW

27:32

THAT SHE CARRIED WATER FOR

27:34

DONALD TRUMP AND WE KNEW THAT

27:35

SHE DID PARTICIPATE IN EFFORTS

27:38

TO KEEP VOTES IN DETROIT FROM MY

27:40

HOMETOWN, SO I TAKE THIS

27:42

JOURNALISTICALLY SERIOUS AND

27:43

PERSONAL TO KEEP THE VOTES FROM

27:45

MOSTLY BLACK VOTERS IN DETROIT

27:47

FROM BEING COUNTSED THAT NIGHT.

27:49

>> THAT'S PART OF THAT PHONE

27:50

CALL.

27:51

>> CORRECT.

27:52

PART OF THAT PRESSURE CAMPAIGN

27:54

THAT DONALD TRUMP NOW STANDS

27:55

ACCUSED IN THE COURT OF LAW OF

27:56

DOING.

27:57

SO THAT'S WHAT I'M BELIEVING

27:59

WHEN IT COMES TO RONNA McDANIEL

28:01

AND NOT ANYTHING THAT SHE SAID

28:04

TODAY BECAUSE OF THOSE

28:05

CREDIBILITY --

28:06

>> STEPHEN, WHERE DO YOU FALL ON

28:07

THIS?

28:08

>> ON THE OTHER HAND IF YOU READ

28:11

THE CRITICISM OF NBC THAT HAS

28:13

COME SINCE THE ANNOUNCEMENT.

28:14

IT IS CLEAR THAT SOME OF THE

28:16

CRITICS DON'T WANT TO BE

28:18

CONFRONTED WITH REPUBLICAN

28:19

VOICES AND CONSERVATIVE

28:20

ARGUMENTS AND THAT'S BAD.

28:22

WE SHOULD HAVE A ROBUST EXCHANGE

28:24

OF PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE DIFFERENT

28:25

THING, BUT I AGREE WITH WHAT'S

28:26

BEEN SAID HERE.

28:27

I MEAN, THAT'S NOT WHAT RONNA

28:29

McDANIEL IS DOING.

28:31

THAT'S NOT WHAT SHE'S BEEN DOING

28:33

AND SHE HAS HUGE CREDIBILITY

28:35

PROBLEMS NOT BECAUSE SHE'S BEEN

28:37

A PARTISAN SPINNER ON BEHALF OF

28:39

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY BECAUSE SHE

28:42

NOT ONLY PRESIDED, BUT DIRECTED

28:44

AND DROVE THE QANONIZATION OF

28:46

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DURING HER

28:48

TENURE AND IT IS THE CASE THAT

28:49

WHEN YOU LOOK AT WHAT SHE DID

28:51

WITH THE FAKE ELECTORS

28:52

SPECIFICALLY, SHE WASN'T ON THAT

28:54

PHONE CALL BECAUSE SHE FELT BAD

28:55

ABOUT SOMEBODY.

28:56

DONALD TRUMP WAS ON THE CALL.

28:58

HE WAS TELLING THEM, SHE WAS

29:00

SAYING WE'LL GET YOU LAWYERS

29:01

BECAUSE THE ENTIRE SIX-WEEK

29:04

PERIOD AFTER NOVEMBER 2020

29:06

ELECTION WAS ABOUT MAKING THE

29:07

CASE THAT THE ELECTION HAD BEEN

29:08

STOLEN.

29:09

SHE DID A TREMENDOUS DISSERVICE

29:11

TO THE COUNTRY BY MAKING THE

29:13

ARGUMENT THAT LED TO THE EROSION

29:15

OF FAITH.

29:16

WE HAVE HALF OF THE REPUBLICANS

29:18

RIGHT NOW BELIEVE THE ELECTION

29:20

WASN'T FAIR AND EVEN TODAY

29:21

CONFRONTED WITH HER PAST VOTES,

29:23

SHE COULDN'T GIVE YOU A STRAIGHT

29:24

ANSWER UNTIL YOUR FORTH OR FIFTH

29:25

TIME.

29:27

>> CHUCK, FINAL TEN SECONDS.

29:29

LOOK, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THIS

29:35

NETWORK AND FOR ALWAYS TO HAVE A

29:38

WIDE APERTURE IN COVERING VOTERS

29:41

THAT HAVE DESPAIRICAL LEADS AND

29:44

IDEOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ON THIS

29:46

PANEL AND I PRIDE MYSELF IN, YOU

29:49

AND I TAKE PLENTIEN OF GRIEF

29:51

WHEN WE HAVE IDEOLOGICAL AND

29:53

POLITICAL DIVERSITY AND ALL OF

29:55

US IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA DO A

29:57

TERRIBLE JOB OF GEOGRAPHIC

29:59

DIVERSITY AND ALL OF THIS STUFF

30:00

AND I CALL INTO QUESTION AND

30:02

SOMETIMES PEOPLE THINK THEY

30:03

UNDERSTAND THE POLITICS OF THIS

30:04

COUNTRY WHEN THEY'RE SORT OF IN

30:07

A VERY, VERY, VERY BLUE CITY.

30:10

YOU KNOW, THIS IS WASHINGTON

30:11

OPERATIVE.

30:12

I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO

30:13

BRING THE NETWORK WHAT THEY

30:14

THINK IT WANTS TO BRING TO THE

30:15

NETWORK.

30:16

I UNDERSTAND THE MOTIVATION, BUT

30:20

THIS EXECUTION, I THINK, WAS

30:21

POOR.

30:22

>> SOMEONE SAID LAST NIGHT WE

30:24

LIVE IN COMPLICATED TOOMS.

30:25

THANK YOU GUYS FOR BEING HERE.

30:26

I APPRECIATE IT.

30:28

WHEN WE COME BACK, MY

30:29

CONVERSATION WITH RETIRED

30:31

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE STEPHEN

30:32

BREYER, HIS THOUGHT OF OVERTURNING ROE V. WADE AND THE

30:34

OVERTURNING ROE V. WADE AND THE STAT

30:45

>>> WELCOME BACK.

30:45

>>> WELCOME BACK.

30:46

HE SAT ON THE HIGHEST COURT IN

30:48

THE COUNTRY FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS.

30:52

JUSTICE STEPHEN BREYER CONFIRMED

30:53

IN 1994 HELPED SHAPE THE

30:54

NATION'S LAWS THROUGH FOUR

30:56

PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATIONS AND

30:57

RETIRED THE SAME YEAR OF THE

30:59

DOBBS DECISION WHICH OVERTURNED

31:01

THE LANDMARK ABORTION RIGHTS

31:02

CASE ROE V. WADE.

31:04

I SAT DOWN WITH JUSTICE BREYER

31:06

AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL THIS WEEK

31:09

WHERE WE DISCUSSED THE

31:10

CONTROVERSIAL DOBBS DECISION AND

31:11

HIS NEW BOOK, READING THE

31:13

CONSTITUTION IN WHICH HE URGES

31:15

THE JUSTICES TO LOOK BEYOND THE

31:18

WORD AS OX ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN

31:20

THE CONSTITUTION TO THE REAL

31:22

WORLD CONSEQUENCES THAT RULINGS

31:22

MAY HAVE.

31:24

>> YOU TOLD "THE NEW YORK TIMES"

31:26

OF THE COURT TODAY SOMETHING

31:28

IMPORTANT IS GOING ON.

31:29

WHAT DID YOU MEAN ABOUT THAT?

31:32

>> I MEANT REALLY WHAT I'VE BEEN

31:35

WRITING HERE THAT I DON'T -- I

31:39

THINK THE MOST IMPORTANT THING

31:42

OR CHARACTERISTIC TO FOCUS ON IS

31:45

A CHANGE IN THE WAY THAT PEOPLE

31:49

ARE INTERPRETING IN GENERAL THIS

31:52

DOCUMENT AND THE STATUTES

31:54

TOWARDS WHAT DID PEOPLE

31:56

ORIGINALLY, WHEN THIS WAS

31:58

WRITTEN, WHAT DID THEY TAKE

32:01

THESE WORDS TO MEAN IN GENERAL?

32:04

IT'S VERY ATTRACTIVE.

32:06

YOU SAY THAT, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO

32:09

IS READ THIS.

32:09

FABULOUS.

32:10

YOU'VE GOT THE ANSWER.

32:12

JUST READ IT, AND IT'S SIMPLE,

32:16

AND IT WILL STOCK THE JUDGES

32:18

FROM DOING, THEY'LL BE BOUND BY

32:18

THE TEXT.

32:20

YOU SEE, IT SOUNDS GOOD.

32:22

SOUNDS GOOD, BUT IT DOESN'T WORK

32:23

VERY WELL, IN MY OPINION, AND

32:25

THAT'S WHY I'VE SPENT A YEAR AND

32:27

A HALF TRYING TO EXPLAIN WHY.

32:28

>> LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT THE

32:31

IMMUNITY CASE, IF I COULD.

32:33

IN APRIL THE COURT IS GOING TO

32:34

HEAR ARGUMENTS ABOUT DONALD

32:36

TRUMP'S CLAIM TO BE IMMUNE FROM

32:37

CRIMINAL PROSECUTION FOR HIS

32:40

EFFORTS TO OVERTURN THE 2020

32:41

ELECTION.

32:42

WHY DO YOU THINK THE COURT TOOK

32:44

THE CASE AND WAS IT NECESSARY

32:46

FOR THE COURT TO TAKE THE CASE?

32:47

>> THAT'S ANOTHER ONE, I'M

32:48

SITTING AROUND THE TABLE.

32:50

I'VE READ THE BRIEFS AND THAT

32:51

ISN'T BEING COY.

32:52

IT'S TRUE.

32:53

MY GOODNESS YOU CAN MAKE

32:56

MISTAKES JUST BY SAYING WHAT

32:58

YOUR INITIAL OPINION IS, AND MY

33:01

GOODNESS, HOW OFTEN IT REALLY

33:03

OCCURS.

33:03

I'M NOT JUST TRYING TO GET OUT

33:06

OF THE QUESTION BECAUSE I CAN

33:07

GET OUT OF THE QUESTION BY

33:08

SAYING I'M NOT GOING TO ANSWER

33:09

THE QUESTION, BUT THE POINT IS

33:11

THERE ARE SO MANY TIMES WHEN YOU

33:14

THINK, LOOK, THIS IS HOW

33:15

DECISION MAKING -- AND I BET

33:17

IT'S TRUE FOR YOU AND I BET IT'S

33:19

TRUE FOR THE PEOPLE WHO WORK

33:21

WITH YOU AND I BET IT'S TRUE FOR

33:23

BUSINESS PEOPLE AND OTHERS AND

33:25

THAT'S WHY IT'S GENUINELY

33:27

IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND AS BEST

33:31

YOU CAN THE DETAILS THAT ARE

33:33

RELEVANT TO AN IMPORTANT

33:35

DECISION, AND I THINK THAT'S

33:36

TRUE OF EVERYONE WHO MAKES THOSE

33:38

DECISIONS AND IT'S CERTAINLY

33:39

TRUE OF THE JUSTICE OF THE

33:41

COURT.

33:42

LET ME TRY IT THIS WAY.

33:45

WERE YOU SURPRISED THAT THEY

33:47

TOOK UP THE CASE OR THEY DIDN'T

33:49

NEED TO?

33:50

>> I MAY HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT

33:52

THAT, BUT THAT'S TOO CLOSE.

33:54

TOO CLOSE.

33:55

[ LAUGHTER ]

33:58

LET ME ASK IT THIS WAY, YOU ARE

34:01

A JUDGE WHO KNOWS WHAT IT IS

34:02

LIKE TO TAKE UP A CRITICAL CASE

34:04

IN THE MIDDLE OF A PRESIDENTIAL

34:04

ELECTION.

34:05

>> THAT WAS BUSH V. GORE, YOU

34:07

MEAN?

34:07

>> YES.

34:09

>> I DO REMEMBER THAT AND IN MY

34:11

OPINION I WROTE THEY SHOULDN'T

34:12

HAVE TAKEN IT UP.

34:13

THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT ABOUT BUSH

34:14

V. GORE.

34:15

I WROTE THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE

34:16

TAKEN UP THE OPINION.

34:18

I THINK THEY SHOULD DECIDE IT

34:18

THE WAY.

34:19

THAT WAS MY VIEW.

34:20

WHY?

34:21

IT WAS A VIEW REACHED AFTER A

34:24

CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF WORK.

34:25

>> I KNOW THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING

34:27

TO WEIGH IN ON THE CURRENT CASES

34:30

BEFORE THE COURT, BUT BIG

34:32

PICTURE, JUSTICE BREYER, DO YOU

34:34

THINK THAT THE PEOPLE OF THIS

34:36

COUNTRY DESERVE TO KNOW A

34:37

VERDICT IN THE ELECTION

34:41

SUBVERSION CASE BEFORE NOVEMBER?

34:42

AS A LEGAL MATTER.

34:44

>> YOU'RE STILL GOING.

34:46

YOU HAVE A LOT OF GOOD

34:48

QUESTIONS, BUT THEY'RE ALL

34:49

AIMING AT THE SAME PLACE.

34:50

>> BIG PICTURE.

34:52

DO THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY

34:53

DESERVE TO KNOW?

34:54

>> THE BIG PICTURE IS I'M NOT

34:57

GOING NEAR A CASE THAT'S -- THAT

34:59

IS AN EVEN BIGGER PICTURE.

35:01

>> LET ME ASK YOU THIS, CAN YOU

35:04

TELL ME WHAT YOU THOUGHT ON

35:08

JANUARY 6th AS THOSE, VENTS EVEN

35:10

UNFOLDING?

35:12

>> ON JANUARY 6th.

35:15

THE BIGGEST PICTURE IS TO ME

35:18

THAT I TELL MYSELF.

35:20

DON'T GO NEAR THESE ISSUES.

35:21

I WAS --

35:22

>> WAS IT A TOUGH DAY FOR YOU?

35:24

>> MANY, MANY, MANY, MANY

35:27

ADVANTAGES AND PRIVILEGES WHEN I

35:29

THINK THAT I WAS A MEMBER OF THE

35:31

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED

35:33

STATES AND THERE ARE A FEW

35:35

DISADVANTAGES AND ONE OF THOSE

35:37

DISADVANTAGES IS DON'T SOUND OFF

35:40

ON THINGS THAT ARE RELEVANT,

35:43

MIGHT BECOME CASES, ET CETERA,

35:46

PARTICULARLY WHETHER YOU'RE ON

35:47

THE COURT OR NOT.

35:48

YOU WERE ON THE COURT.

35:50

>> LET'S TALK ABOUT DOBBS.

35:52

IT WOULD BE TWO YEARS SINCE

35:54

DOBBS, AS YOU KNOW, ENDED THE

35:55

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO GET AN

35:56

ABORTION.

35:57

YOU DISSENTED.

36:00

WHAT DO YOU THINK THE IMPACT OF

36:04

DOBBS HAS BEEN. >> WHAT I PUT IN THIS BOOK AND G

36:08

AS DOREN JAGR 6YE0aET MAWOTHHOK >> WHAT I PUT IN THIS BOOK AND G AR

36:44

WE THOUGHT IT PROBABLY WOULD,

36:45

WE THOUGHT IT PROBABLY WOULD,

36:46

AND WE THOUGHT THERE WOULD BE A

36:47

LOT OF ISSUES COMING TO THE

36:50

COURTS, COMING OUT OF THE

36:53

DECISION TO OVERRULE ROE VERSUS

36:54

WADE.

36:55

THAT'S WHAT WE SAID IN THE

36:56

OPINION.

36:57

>> WELL, AND YOU ALSO SAID THE

37:00

MAJORITY'S REFUSAL TO CONSIDER

37:02

THE LIFE-ALTERING CONSEQUENCES

37:03

OF REVERSING ROE IN CASES.

37:06

IT'S A STUNNING INDICTMENT OF

37:07

ITS DECISION.

37:08

THOSE ARE VERY STRONG WORDS.

37:10

>> WE FELT STRONGLY ON THAT

37:12

CASE, YES.

37:14

>> WELL, AND I GUESS THE

37:17

QUESTION IS DO -- IS WHAT YOU

37:20

ANTICIPATED COME TO PASS?

37:22

>> I WANT TO STAY AWAY FROM --

37:25

IT'S NOT THAT I DON'T HAVE

37:27

ANSWERS FOR THESE THINGS IN MY

37:29

MIND, BUT I WANT TO STAY AWAY

37:31

PUBLICLY FROM -- I WANT TO STICK

37:33

AS CLOSELY ON A RECENT CASE AS

37:35

POSSIBLE TO WHAT I SAID IN THIS

37:37

BOOK, AND I DID MY BEST TO STICK

37:40

TO AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO WHAT

37:42

IS ALREADY PUBLIC.

37:44

IN OTHER WORDS, WE HAVE TOTALLY

37:46

OPPOSITE INTERESTS THERE BECAUSE

37:49

MY INTEREST IS NOT TO MAKE NEWS.

37:51

[ LAUGHTER ]

37:52

>> I'M TRYING HARD, JUSTICE

37:53

BREYER.

37:54

>> I KNOW.

37:57

>> LET ME ASK YOU, IN TEXAS

38:00

THERE WERE ESTIMATED TO BE MORE

38:04

THAN 26,000 RAPE-RELATED

38:05

PREGNANCIES AFTER THE FIRST 16

38:07

MONTHS AFTER THE NEAR TOTAL

38:09

ABORTION BAN WAS IN EFFECT AND

38:10

PART OF IT IS THE CONCERNS ABOUT

38:13

A PATCHWORK OF LAWS.

38:14

IS THAT PART -- WAS THAT PART OF

38:17

YOUR CONCERN WHEN YOU DISSENTED

38:18

TO ROE BEING OVERTURNED?

38:20

>> I -- I THOUGHT ROE SHOULD NOT

38:23

BE OVERTURNED.

38:24

I THOUGHT CASEY SHOULD NOT BE

38:25

OVERTURNED.

38:26

>> CAN YOU SEE A WORLD, A

38:29

POSSIBILITY IN WHICH DOBBS IS

38:32

OVERTURNED ONE DAY IN ANOTHER 15

38:33

YEARS?

38:34

>> I DON'T KNOW.

38:35

>> IS IT POSSIBLE?

38:37

>> OH, IT'S POSSIBLE, BUT WHO

38:39

KNOWS?

38:41

>> HOW DISRUPTIVE WAS THE LEAK

38:44

TO THE COURT AND TO THE

38:46

RELATIONSHIPS THAT YOU DESCRIBE?

38:48

>> IT WAS UNFORTUNATE.

38:49

>> WERE YOU ANGRY?

38:52

>> YOU TRY TO AVOID GETTING

38:55

ANGRY WHERE THAT -- YOU TRY IN A

39:00

JOB, YOU TRY TO REMAIN AS CALM,

39:04

REASONABLE AND SERIOUS AS

39:05

POSSIBLE.

39:06

I THINK IT WAS UNFORTUNATE.

39:09

>> HOW MUCH DISCUSSION WAS THERE

39:12

ABOUT A POTENTIAL COMPROMISE

39:13

AROUND 15 WEEKS.

39:15

>> YOU KNOW AS MUCH ABOUT THAT

39:17

AS I DO.

39:18

>> YOU PROBABLY KNOW MORE.

39:21

>> CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS WROTE,

39:23

AND WHEN YOU SEE WHAT IS

39:26

WRITTEN, THE NORMAL SITUATION IS

39:28

BEFORE SOMETHING IS WRITTEN IN

39:30

THE CONFERENCE.

39:31

PEOPLE IN SOME FORM OR OTHER

39:33

WILL DISCUSS WHAT THEY'RE

39:35

THINKING OF WRITING.

39:38

NOT ALWAYS AND NOT IDENTICAL,

39:40

BUT THERE'S USUALLY SOME

39:41

DISCUSSION.

39:42

>> DID YOU THINK THAT A

39:44

COMPROMISE WAS POSSIBLE BEFORE

39:48

THE LEAK AROUND 15 WEEKS?

39:52

I USUALLY HOPE FOR COMPROMISE.

39:54

>> SO YOU WERE HOPEFUL THERE

39:55

COULD BE A COMPROMISE.

39:57

>> YOU WANT TO PUT WORDS IN MY

40:00

MOUTH.

40:00

I'M CAREFUL WITH WHAT I SAY ON

40:02

THIS BECAUSE I SAY OUR INTERESTS

40:03

ARE DIFFERENT.

40:04

I DON'T WANT TO MAKE NEWS.

40:06

I'VE WRITTEN WHAT I THOUGHT.

40:07

IF YOU THINK THERE'S NEWS IN

40:09

HERE OR IN THE DISSENT, GO RIGHT

40:12

AHEAD, BUT I DON'T WANT TO SAY SOMETHING IN ADDITION.

40:14

SOMETHING IN ADDITION.

40:16

>> JUST TO BE CLEAR THEN, DID

40:21

YOU -- DID YOU THINK IT'S

40:23

POSSIBLE?

40:24

>> I ALWAYS THINK IT'S POSSIBLE,

40:26

USUALLY UP UNTIL THE LAST

40:27

MINUTE.

40:28

>> WERE COW YOU SURPRISED THAT

40:30

THE INTERNAL INVESTIGATION

40:31

DIDN'T DETERMINE WHO WAS

40:35

ACTUALLY BEHIND THE LEAK?

40:38

DID YOU --

40:39

>> YOU WANT TO ASK THAT

40:42

QUESTION, ASK THE PEOPLE WHO DO

40:43

INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS LIKE

40:44

THAT.

40:45

THEY'RE THE PEOPLE TO ASK AND

40:47

THAT MAY OCCUR ALL OVER THE

40:49

GOVERNMENT.

40:50

>> BUT DID YOU FEEL BETRAYED BY

40:51

THE LEAK?

40:52

>> THAT'S A STRONGER WAY OF

40:55

PUTTING WHAT YOU'VE ALREADY

40:56

ASKED.

40:57

I WAS DISAPPOINTED.

41:00

I WAS -- I'M SORRY ABOUT THE

41:02

LEAK.

41:03

>> AND DO YOU HAVE A THEORY OF

41:05

THE CASE?

41:06

DO YOU THINK THAT THE LEAKER WAS

41:08

SOMEONE WHO WANTED TO SOUND THE

41:11

ALARM ABOUT ROE BEING OVERTURNED

41:13

OR WANTED THE DRAFT OPINION TO

41:15

BE LOCKED IN PLACE?

41:16

DO YOU HAVE YOUR OWN THEORY?

41:17

>> DO I HAVE MY THEORY ABOUT IT?

41:19

YES.

41:20

>> YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SHARE

41:22

THEM WITH ME.

41:24

>> CORRECT.

41:24

[ LAUGHTER ]

41:25

>> CAN YOU TALK ABOUT IT IN THE

41:27

BROADER CONTEXT, THOUGH?

41:28

DO YOU HAVE A SENSE OF WHAT THE

41:30

MOTIVE OF THE LEAKER WAS?

41:32

>> THAT'S PART OF THE THEORY.

41:34

>> AND GIVEN -- FAIR TO SAY HOW

41:36

THE FACT THAT YOU'RE

41:37

DISAPPOINTED, YOU WERE NOT

41:39

BEHIND THIS IN ANY WAY?

41:43

>> I'M NOT EVEN GOING TO SAY

41:46

THAT.

41:46

I WOULD BE AMAZED IF IT WAS A

41:48

JUDGE.

41:49

>> OKAY.

41:50

>> THERE.

41:51

BUT I DON'T KNOW.

41:52

YOU KNOW, WE NEVER KNOW.

41:56

>> DOBBS HAPPENED IN PART,

42:01

OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE AMY CONEY

42:04

BARRETT REPLACED GINSBURG WHO

42:06

WAS STILL ON THE BENCH.

42:08

DO YOU THINK THERE SHOULD BE AGE

42:10

LIMITS ON THE SUPREME COURT?

42:12

>> I'VE SAID, AND I THINK IT'S

42:13

TRUE.

42:14

I DON'T THINK THAT'S HARMFUL.

42:15

IF YOU HAD LONG TERMS, FOR

42:18

EXAMPLE, THEY'D HAVE TO BE LONG.

42:19

WHY LONG?

42:20

BECAUSE I DON'T THINK YOU WANT

42:22

SOMEONE WHO IS APPOINTED TO THE

42:24

SUPREME COURT TO BE THINKING

42:26

ABOUT HIS NEXT JOB AND SO A

42:28

20-YEAR TERM, I DON'T KNOW,

42:30

18-YEAR TERM.

42:31

FINE.

42:31

FINE.

42:32

I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD BE

42:32

HARMFUL.

42:33

I THINK IT WOULD HAVE HELPED, IN

42:34

MY CASE.

42:36

IT WOULD HAVE HELPED ME CASE --

42:38

IT WOULD HAVE AVOIDED FOR ME

42:40

GOING THROUGH DIFFICULT

42:42

DECISIONS WHEN YOU RETIRE,

42:44

WHAT'S THE RIGHT TIME?

42:45

AND SO THAT WOULD BE OKAY.

42:47

>> HOW DIFFICULT WAS IT FOR YOU

42:49

TO DECIDE TO RETIRE?

42:51

>> IT'S DIFFICULT.

42:53

>> YOU MISS BEING ON THE SUPREME

42:54

COURT?

42:55

>> OF COURSE, BUT YES -- BUT YOU

42:59

KNOW, LIFE, HUMAN LIFE IS TOUGH

43:02

AND MOREOVER, YOU GET OLDER AND

43:06

85, WHICH I AM NOW.

43:09

83, I MEAN, YOU'VE BEEN THERE

43:12

FOR QUITE A WHILE AND OTHER

43:15

PEOPLE ALSO SHOULD HAVE A CHANCE

43:17

AT THIS JOB AND AT SOME POINT

43:19

YOU'RE JUST NOT GOING TO BE ABLE

43:23

TO DO IT, AND I THINK I CAN DO

43:26

IT, NONETHELESS, THERE COMES A

43:28

TIME YOU HAVE TO FIGURE OUT

43:29

WHAT'S THE RIGHT TIME.

43:30

THERE ARE LOTS OF

43:31

CONSIDERATIONS.

43:32

>> WAS THE IDEOLOGICAL BALANCE

43:34

ON THE COURT PART OF YOUR

43:35

CONVERSATION TO RETIRE WHEN YOU

43:36

DID?

43:37

>> THERE WERE A LOT OF THINGS,

43:40

THEREIN, PROBABLY PART.

43:41

>> MORE OF MY CONVERSATION WITH

43:43

THE FORMER JUSTICE AIRS NEXT

43:44

SUNDAY. WHEN WE COME BACK, A LOOK BACK

43:46

WHEN WE COME BACK, A LOOK BACK AT HOW LAWKERS FELMA

43:57

>>> WELCOME BACK.

43:58

>>> WELCOME BACK.

43:59

TRUST IN THE SUPREME COURT IS

44:01

NEAR AN ALL-TIME LOW.

44:03

YET ANOTHER SIGN OF OUR

44:05

HYPERPARTAN POLITICS.

44:06

THE LAST FOUR CONFIRMATIONS TO

44:09

THE HIGH COURT ALL MOSTLY CAME

44:11

DOWN TO PARTY LINE VOTES AND OF

44:13

COURSE, PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA'S

44:15

NOMINATION OF MERRICK GARLAND

44:16

WAS NEVER EVEN BROUGHT TO THE

44:18

FLOOR, BUT IT WASN'T ALWAYS THIS

44:20

WAY.

44:20

NOMINATED BY PRESIDENT BILL

44:22

CLINTON IN 1994, JUSTICE BREYER

44:26

WAS CONFIRMED BY AN 87-9 MARGIN.

44:29

HERE'S HOW THE SENATE LEADERS AT

44:30

THE TIME TALKED ABOUT HIS

44:32

CONFIRMATION PROCESS.

44:33

>> LET ME ASK YOU FIRST ABOUT

44:35

THE SUPREME COURT, THE

44:37

NOMINATION OF STEPHEN BREYER,

44:39

SENATOR DOLE, YOUR REACTION?

44:41

>> GOOD CHOICE.

44:42

NOT A CONSERVATIVE, BUT I THINK

44:45

NOT AS LIBERAL AS BLACKMAN, A

44:48

MAN OF GREAT INTELLECT.

44:50

HE IS RESPECTED BY REPUBLICANS

44:52

OR DEMOCRATS, UNLESS SOMETHING

44:53

UNFORESEEN HAPPENS IT WILL BE AN

44:55

EASY CONFIRMATION.

44:56

>> SENATOR MITCHELL?

44:58

>> THINK HE WILL BE CONFIRMED

45:00

EASILY.

45:01

HE HAS A SOLID RECORD, GOOD

45:03

JURIST.

45:03

I DON'T THINK THE LABELS

45:06

CONSERVATIVE LIBERALS MEAN MUCH

45:08

WHEN APPLIED TO JUDGES.

45:10

HISTORY INDICATES THAT IT'S NOT

45:12

PARTICULARLY PREDICTABLE AS TO

45:13

THE ISSUES THAT WOULD OCCUR

45:15

DURING HIS TENURE OR WHAT THE

45:16

REACTION WOULD BE.

45:18

I THINK HE'S A VERY GOOD JUDGE OF SOUND, LEGAL MIND, GOOD

45:21

OF SOUND, LEGAL MIND, GOOD TRAINING, WELL EXPERIENC

45:30

>> THE PANEL IS BACK.

45:31

>> THE PANEL IS BACK.

45:32

KIMBERLY, I'M GOING TO START

45:33

WITH YOU.

45:34

AS OUR LAWYER AT THE TABLE, WHAT

45:37

WERE YOUR TAKEAWAYS FROM JUSTICE

45:38

BREYER.

45:39

>> FIRST, IT DID NOT SURPRISE ME

45:41

AT ALL THAT HE WOULD NOT SPEAK

45:43

ABOUT ANYTHING ABOUT THE SUPREME

45:43

COURT.

45:44

THAT SAY KNOWN TRADITION AT THE

45:46

U.S. SUPREME COURT.

45:47

WITH RESPECT TO HIS BOOK AND THE

45:49

READING OF THE CONSTITUTION AND

45:51

THE IDEA OF THE CONSERVATIVES

45:52

THAT YOU LOOK AT THE TEXT AND

45:54

SOMEHOW IT MAGICALLY TELLS YOU

45:55

THE ANSWERS ABOUT WHAT THE

45:57

FONDERS INTENDED AND THE BOOK IS

45:59

THERE TO LAY THAT BARE AND IT'S

46:02

NOT JUST JUSTICIS LIKE BREYER

46:04

THAT TALKS ABOUT HOW NOT WISE IT

46:08

IS, AND HOW NONSENSICAL IT IS

46:10

BECAUSE THERE ARE CON FLICKS

46:11

WITHIN THE RIGHTS OF THE

46:13

CONSTITUTION AND OTHER

46:14

REPUBLICANS HAVE SAID THE SAME

46:16

THING AND ANTHONY KENNEDY, DAVID

46:17

SUITOR.

46:18

I WISH THAT THEY WOULD SPEAK,

46:20

TOO, ABOUT THE MISGUIDED WAY

46:22

THAT THE CONSERVATIVES ARE

46:24

READING THE CONSTITUTION IN THE

46:26

NAME OF ORIGINALISM.

46:28

>> STEPHEN, DOBBS IS AT THE

46:30

CENTER OF THE ARGUMENT THAT HE

46:31

MAKES AND THERE ARE REAL WORLD

46:32

CONSEQUENCES.

46:33

>> THERE IS A CONTEXTUALISM AND

46:37

THERE IS AN ARGUMENT TO BE MADE

46:39

FOR CONTEXTUALISM AND IF THERE

46:41

WERE MORE TIME I WOULD MAKE IT,

46:44

BUT ON DOBBS, JUSTICE BREYER

46:45

TALKS ABOUT A POTENTIAL

46:47

COMPROMISE ON DOBBS.

46:49

ISN'T IT BETTER TO JUST

46:51

ADJUDICATE RATHER THAN

46:52

COMPROMISEES.

46:53

>> LET'S REMEMBER WHY THE COURT

46:56

THINKS IT'S POLITICIZED.

46:58

THE JUSTICES THEMSELVES HAVE NOT

46:59

WANTED TO DO THIS.

47:00

THIS HAS BEEN BROUGHT UPON OUR

47:03

POLITICS ON THAT, WHAT IS BROKEN

47:05

IS THE CONFIRMATION PROCESS,

47:07

HOPEFULLY THAT PROCESS DOESN'T

47:09

THEN DESTROY THE JUDICIARY, BUT

47:10

IT IS ON THE U.S. SENATE TO FIX

47:12

THIS, NOT THE COURTS.

47:13

>> AND HE TALKS ABOUT HIS

47:14

CONCERNS ABOUT THE LOSS OF

47:15

PUBLIC TRUST.

47:16

THANKS, YOU GUYS.

47:17

THAT IS ALL FOR TODAY.

47:18

THANK YOU FOR WATCHING.

47:20

WE'LL BE BACK NEXT WEEK BECAUSE

47:22

IF IT'S SUNDAY, IT'S "MEET THE PRESS."

47:25

47:26

47:26

47:26

♪ ♪

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

العلامات ذات الصلة
2024 ElectionsSupreme CourtPolitical InterviewsElection SubversionJudicial DecisionsParty DynamicsLegal AnalysisPolitical DiscoursePublic TrustHistorical Context
هل تحتاج إلى ملخص باللغة العربية؟