Opus Clip vs Vidyo.ai: what's best for automated YouTube Shorts?
TLDRThe video script compares Opus Clip and Video AI, two platforms for creating YouTube shorts from long videos. It highlights Opus Clip's ability to use keywords for better clip selection and its higher number of usable clips. The script also critiques Video AI for its duplication issue and lack of speaker tracking. Opus Clip's customization tools, such as easy clip trimming and b-roll addition, are praised. Finally, Opus Clip's lower pricing is noted as a deciding factor, making it the preferred choice for efficiently creating engaging YouTube shorts.
Takeaways
- 📌 Both Opus Clip and Video AI are platforms designed to create YouTube shorts from longer videos.
- 🔍 Opus Clip allows users to paste links from various platforms like YouTube, Zoom, Rumble, or Streamyard, while Video AI supports only YouTube links.
- 🔑 Opus Clip provides an additional feature of inputting keywords, which gives the AI more direction in selecting clips.
- ⏱️ Both platforms took approximately 20 minutes to generate clips from a 38-minute video, meeting the time-saving objective.
- 📈 Opus Clip generated 20 clips, whereas Video AI produced 18, with Opus Clip yielding 13 usable clips compared to 7 from Video AI.
- 🎥 Video AI sometimes duplicated the original video and failed to focus on the speaking participant, requiring manual cleanup.
- 📊 Opus Clip accurately tracked the correct participant and avoided duplication, streamlining the editing process.
- 🛠️ Both platforms offer customization tools, but Opus Clip allows for more precise editing by setting start and end points with text selection.
- ➕ Video AI enables adding text at any point in the clip, a feature unique to its platform.
- 🌟 Opus Clip has additional features like removing pauses and filler words, and adding b-roll footage to enhance the clips.
- 💰 Opus Clip's pricing starts at $19 per month, which is $10 cheaper than Video AI's starting price of $29 per month.
Q & A
What are the two platforms mentioned in the transcript for creating YouTube shorts from long videos?
-The two platforms mentioned are Opus Clip and Video AI.
How does Opus Clip handle video links from different sources?
-Opus Clip allows users to paste links from YouTube, Zoom, Rumble, or Streamyard, and also supports uploading the original video directly from the computer.
What feature does Opus Clip have at the beginning stage that Video AI doesn't?
-Opus Clip allows users to paste in keywords, which the AI uses to find and create clips, giving it a bit of direction and improving the selection process.
How long did it take for both Opus Clip and Video AI to return with chopped up clips from a 38-minute original video?
-Both Opus Clip and Video AI took approximately 20 minutes to return with the clips.
How many usable clips did the user get from Opus Clip and Video AI respectively?
-The user got 13 usable clips from Opus Clip and only 7 usable clips from Video AI.
What issue did the user encounter with Video AI regarding the duplication of the original source video in the clips?
-Video AI often duplicated the original source video so it would show at both the top and bottom of the clip, which was annoying and required manual cleanup.
How does Opus Clip handle speaker tracking within the clips?
-Opus Clip has live tracking that follows speakers as they move around the frame, ensuring the correct person is focused on during the clip.
What customization tools are available for individual clips in Opus Clip and Video AI?
-Both platforms provide the ability to change the design of subtitles and move the original video around. Opus Clip allows setting start and end points by clicking on words, while Video AI uses a slider. Video AI also allows adding text at any point in the clip, whereas Opus Clip offers the option to remove pauses and fill words, and add b-roll footage.
What are the pricing differences between Opus Clip and Video AI?
-Video AI's monthly pricing starts at $29 for their non-free plan, while Opus Clip's paid plan begins at $19 a month, making Opus Clip $10 cheaper.
Which platform did the user find to be better at finding captivating moments and why?
-The user found Opus Clip to be better at finding captivating moments because it came back with more clips, had better speaker tracking, and provided more usable clips without needing manual cleanup.
What additional feature does Opus Clip offer that Video AI does not, regarding the removal of unwanted sections from the middle of clips?
-Opus Clip allows users to remove whole chunks from the middle of a clip, providing more flexibility and control over the final content, whereas Video AI does not offer this feature.
Outlines
📝 Comparing Opus Clip and Video AI for YouTube Shorts
This paragraph compares the functionality and effectiveness of Opus Clip and Video AI in generating YouTube shorts from longer videos. It highlights the ease of use for both platforms, the ability to upload or link videos from various sources, and the unique feature of Opus Clip that allows users to input keywords for AI to focus on. The paragraph also discusses the time efficiency of both platforms and the number of clips generated, with Opus Clip producing more usable clips compared to Video AI. Additionally, it points out issues with Video AI, such as duplicating the original video and failing to focus on the speaking subject, which contrasts with Opus Clip's ability to track the correct person and avoid duplication.
🛠️ Customization Tools and Pricing Analysis
The second paragraph delves into the customization tools available on both Opus Clip and Video AI, noting differences in adjusting start and end points of clips and the ability to add text. It praises Video AI for its feature to add b-roll footage and remove pauses, while also highlighting Opus Clip's superior performance in these areas. The paragraph concludes with a discussion on pricing, revealing that Opus Clip's paid plan is more affordable than Video AI's, making it a more attractive option for users looking to create YouTube shorts without watermarks.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Opus Clip
💡Video AI
💡YouTube Shorts
💡AI
💡Customization Tools
💡Efficiency
💡Pricing
💡Keywords
💡Live Tracking
💡B-roll Footage
💡Watermark
Highlights
Both Opus Clip and Video AI are platforms designed to create YouTube shorts from long videos.
Opus Clip allows users to paste links from various platforms like YouTube, Zoom, Rumble, or Streamyard, while Video AI supports only YouTube links.
Opus Clip provides the option to input keywords, giving the AI direction when selecting clips, a feature Video AI lacks.
Both platforms took approximately 20 minutes to generate clips from a 38-minute video, demonstrating efficiency in time-saving.
Opus Clip returned 20 clips, while Video AI returned 18, with Opus Clip providing 5 more clips.
Out of the 18 clips from Video AI, only 7 were usable, whereas Opus Clip provided 13 usable clips from 20.
Video AI sometimes duplicated the original video, showing it at both the top and bottom of the clip, which could be problematic.
Opus Clip accurately tracked the correct person talking within the clip, whereas Video AI struggled to identify the speaker.
Both platforms offer customization tools, such as changing the design of subtitles and moving the original video.
Opus Clip makes it easier to change the start and end points of clips by clicking on words, while Video AI requires dragging a slider.
Video AI allows users to add text at any point in the clip, a feature not mentioned for Opus Clip.
Opus Clip offers the ability to remove pauses and fill words, and add b-roll footage to enhance the YouTube short.
Opus Clip allows users to remove sections from the middle of a clip, while Video AI does not provide this feature.
Pricing for Video AI starts at $29 per month for their non-free plan, while Opus Clip's paid plan begins at $19 per month.
In conclusion, Opus Clip seems to be more effective at finding captivating moments and has a lower price point compared to Video AI.
The reviewer suggests that Opus Clip is the better choice for creators looking to generate YouTube shorts efficiently and cost-effectively.