Suno, Udio (and other music AI). We're F*ED and it's really BAD. Seriously.
TLDRPaul, a music creator, expresses his deep concerns about the impact of AI-generated music on the music industry. He argues that AI music platforms, like Sunno AI, which can produce high-quality tracks at a fraction of the cost and time it takes human musicians, will lead to the extinction of human-created stock music. He compares this to the exploitation of natural resources by oil companies, where human creativity and emotion are harvested and sold cheaply, leaving artists helpless. Paul fears that this technology will render most music creators obsolete, as corporations prioritize efficiency and cost over human artistry. Despite his apprehensions, he remains passionate about music and continues to create, believing in the irreplaceable human connection in music creation.
Takeaways
- 🎵 The impact of AI-generated music is becoming increasingly significant for music creators, potentially leading to the decline of human-created stock music.
- 🚀 AI music platforms like Sunno AI are offering services that can produce high volumes of music at a very low cost, which could disrupt the music industry.
- 🤖 AI's ability to learn and reproduce music styles rapidly is seen as both impressive and terrifying by the speaker, who raises concerns about the future of music creation.
- 💸 The economic implications of AI music generation are highlighted, with the potential for it to render human commercial music creators obsolete.
- 📉 Concerns are raised about the legalities of AI learning from copyrighted material and the potential for copyright infringement.
- 🎶 The speaker discusses the emotional and creative toll that the rise of AI in music could have on artists, who may feel that their life's work has been stolen.
- 🌐 A comparison is made to the exploitation by large companies in other industries, suggesting that tech companies are harvesting human creativity for profit.
- 👎 The speaker expresses a strong negative sentiment towards the capitalistic exploitation of AI in music, viewing it as deeply unjust.
- 👷♂️ Despite the grim outlook, the speaker acknowledges the need to adapt and find new ways to earn a living, possibly outside of the music industry.
- 🤔 There's a call for reflection on the societal changes that AI could bring, with a warning that it could lead to a deeply inhuman and unjust society.
- 🌟 The video ends on a hopeful note, emphasizing the irreplaceable human experience and passion for music that AI cannot replicate.
Q & A
What is the main concern expressed by the speaker about music AI like Sunno AI?
-The speaker is concerned that AI music generation is becoming so proficient and inexpensive that it will render human music creators, particularly those in the stock music industry, obsolete and unable to compete.
What does the speaker believe will happen to the stock music industry within a year?
-The speaker believes that within a year, the human investment in creating stock music will be dead, as AI music generators will be able to produce music faster and cheaper than human composers.
What is the speaker's opinion on the legality and ethics of AI music generation?
-The speaker questions the legality of AI music generation due to copyright concerns, as it requires feeding the AI with a lot of material. They also describe it as a form of theft, where human creativity and work are being exploited by AI without the creators' consent.
How does the speaker feel about the impact of AI on music creators?
-The speaker feels that AI is stealing the livelihood of music creators, leaving them helpless and without a means to earn a living from their craft. They express a deep sense of injustice and sadness over this development.
What does the speaker think about the future of commercial music creators?
-The speaker is pessimistic about the future of commercial music creators, stating that they will likely be replaced by AI music generators, which can produce music more quickly and cheaply.
What is the speaker's view on the societal implications of AI music generation?
-The speaker fears that the widespread adoption of AI music generation will lead to a deeply inhuman and unjust society, where human creativity and emotion are commodified and exploited.
What does the speaker suggest as a possible reaction to the rise of AI in music creation?
-The speaker suggests that there may not be a significant societal reaction or revolution against AI in music creation, as artists do not have the same collective bargaining power as other workers, such as miners or farmers.
How does the speaker describe the process of generating music with Sunno AI?
-The speaker describes the process as incredibly easy and cost-effective, with the ability to generate hundreds of songs for a very low price, which they find both impressive and terrifying.
What is the speaker's personal strategy for dealing with the rise of AI in music creation?
-The speaker plans to adjust to the new reality, as they have no choice, but they will continue to create music and run their channel out of passion, despite their opposition to AI in music creation.
What alternative skills does the speaker mention having that could help them outside of music creation?
-The speaker mentions having skills in construction and renovation, including knowledge of doors, windows, ceilings, walls, electricity, and hydraulics, which could provide a fallback if their music career is affected by AI.
How does the speaker summarize their feelings towards AI music generation?
-The speaker is deeply troubled and against AI music generation, feeling that it is a form of theft and a threat to human creativity and livelihood. However, they acknowledge they will have to adapt to the changing landscape.
Outlines
😤 The Threat of AI to Stock Music Creation
Paul, the host of the YouTube channel, discusses the alarming impact of AI-generated music on the music industry. He argues that AI's ability to rapidly and cheaply produce music will render human-created stock music obsolete. He shares his personal experience with Sunno AI, a platform that offers a vast amount of music for a fraction of the cost compared to human-made music. Paul expresses his concern for the future of music creators and the potential loss of human creativity in the face of AI.
🎵 AI's Capability to Generate Music in Various Styles
The video continues with Paul demonstrating Sunno AI's ability to generate music based on simple prompts. He showcases how the AI can create corporate music, a fast dubstep track, and even mimic the style of specific bands like Everything But The Girl and Massive Attack. Paul questions the AI's learning process and raises concerns about copyright issues, as the AI seems to have been 'fed' a vast amount of material to achieve such diverse outputs.
😨 The Future of Commercial Music in the Wake of AI
Paul delves into the future of commercial music creators, expressing his belief that they will struggle to compete with AI-generated music. He emphasizes that businesses and corporations will prioritize cost and efficiency over the human element of music creation. He predicts that the market for commercial music will be largely replaced by AI-generated content, leading to a significant loss of opportunities for human musicians and composers.
🤔 Ethical and Legal Concerns of AI in Music
The discussion turns to the ethical and legal implications of AI in music. Paul questions how AI learns to mimic various music styles and whether this process involves copyright infringement. He brings up the opinion of Noam Chomsky, who has criticized generative AI as a form of plagiarism. Paul feels that the use of AI in music is akin to theft, with human creators being robbed of their work and passion.
😔 The Human Cost of AI in Music Creation
Paul expresses his frustration and sadness over the potential loss of human creativity to AI. He empathizes with musicians who have dedicated their lives to music and are now facing the threat of being replaced by machines. He compares the situation to the exploitation of natural resources by large corporations and laments the lack of public outcry over the plight of artists. Paul fears that society will become more inhuman and unjust as a result of AI's encroachment on creative fields.
🤝 The Invaluable Human Connection in Music
Despite his concerns, Paul remains passionate about music and committed to his channel. He acknowledges the inevitability of AI's role in the music industry but maintains that the human connection and the personal experience of creating and enjoying music are irreplaceable. He asserts that while AI may change the market, it cannot replicate the genuine emotions and creativity that humans bring to music. Paul ends on a note of defiance, vowing to continue creating and sharing his love for music with his audience.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Music
💡Stock Music
💡Suno AI
💡Neural Networks
💡Copyright
💡Music Creators
💡Commercial Music
💡Artistic Passion
💡Economic and Social Impact
💡Protests and Resistance
💡Human to Human Experience
Highlights
AI music generation is becoming increasingly skillful, posing a serious threat to human music creators.
The speaker predicts that within a year, human investment in stock music will be obsolete due to AI.
AI music platforms, like Sunno, can generate hundreds of songs for a fraction of the cost of human creation.
The lyrics generated by AI can sometimes be surprisingly good, occasionally exceeding human efforts.
AI's ability to mimic various music styles raises concerns about the future of commercial music creation.
The rapid generation of music by AI could lead to a significant loss of income for professional musicians.
There's a fear that AI-generated music will lead to a lack of originality and creativity in the music industry.
The ethical and legal implications of AI music generation are questioned, with concerns about copyright infringement.
AI's role in music creation is compared to theft, with human creators feeling robbed of their work and livelihood.
The impact of AI on the music industry could be as transformative and potentially destructive as the arrival of Columbus in America.
Human musicians may be forced to find new ways to earn money as their work becomes devalued by AI.
The speaker expresses a strong personal opposition to the capitalistic exploitation of AI in music creation.
Despite the AI threat, human creativity and passion for music are considered irreplaceable.
The speaker remains committed to creating music and engaging with an audience despite the challenges posed by AI.
AI's potential to displace human jobs in music creation is likened to the exploitation by large corporations in other industries.
The societal implications of AI in music are seen as deeply inhuman and unjust, leading to a potential societal transformation.
The speaker bets that human-written stock music will be largely non-existent within a year or two due to AI advancements.
AI is viewed as an extended search engine, capable of searching through human ideas and spitting them out in seconds.