Who is the AI music King? Udio VS Suno showdown
TLDRIn this showdown, the AI music platforms Udio and Suno are compared based on the quality of their generated music. The comparison involves using identical prompts to create a heartfelt indie pop song and an electronica song, and evaluating the lyrics, fidelity, and vocal expressions produced by each. Udio impresses with higher fidelity and more convincing vocals, despite its slower generation speed and shorter song lengths. The video also discusses potential improvements and the competitive dynamic between the two AI music platforms.
Takeaways
- 🎵 The video compares two AI music platforms: Udio and Sunno, focusing on their ability to generate quality music and lyrics.
- 🔍 Both platforms were tested with the same prompt: a heartfelt indie pop song about surviving a zombie apocalypse.
- 🎤 Udio's output has higher fidelity than Sunno's, which is limited to a low-quality MP3 format.
- 💡 Udio's higher quality samples offer more flexibility for music producers to improve and manipulate the vocals.
- 🚀 Udio can generate about 30 seconds of music at a time, while Sunno can produce longer pieces, up to two minutes.
- 🔄 The workflow of starting with a small sample and developing it into a full song is preferred by the reviewer.
- 🎶 Sunno tends to repeat similar lyrics across different versions, while Udio shows potential for more diverse lyrics.
- 📶 The reviewer discusses an upcoming AI tool, Audio SR, which may improve the fidelity of AI-generated music.
- 🧪 The reviewer experiments with different voice modifications in Music F, an audio editing platform, to enhance Udio's output.
- 🎧 Udio's male vocals show promise, but there are still some issues with the transition and quality when compared to female vocals.
- 🏃 The competition between Udio and Sunno is expected to drive innovation and improvements in AI music generation technology.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video transcript?
-The main topic of the video transcript is a comparison between two AI music generation platforms, Udio and Suno, based on their ability to create music using specific prompts.
What type of music was generated using both Udio and Suno?
-The type of music generated was a heartfelt indie pop song with a female singer, themed around surviving a zombie apocalypse.
What are the advantages of higher fidelity in music generation as mentioned in the transcript?
-Higher fidelity allows for better sound quality, which makes it easier to extract high-quality samples from the music, enhancing the flexibility for music producers to improve and manipulate the vocals.
What is the typical length of music generated by Udio at a time?
-Udio typically generates about 30 seconds of music at a time, although it is possible to extend the length.
How does the workflow of starting with a small sample and then developing it compare to generating longer pieces?
-Starting with a small sample allows for more customization throughout the construction of the song, as it provides a seed from which the song can be extended and lyrics can be modified.
What is the issue with the lyrics generated by both Udio and Suno?
-The issue with the lyrics generated by both platforms is that they often lack originality and tend to repeat the same material, making it challenging to produce unique and compelling lyrics.
What feature does the speaker find impressive about Udio's music generation?
-The speaker finds Udio's higher fidelity and clarity of the voice impressive, which suggests better sound quality compared to Suno.
What is the process the speaker uses to improve the vocals of AI-generated music?
-The speaker extracts the vocals from the AI-generated music and then attempts to improve the quality of the vocals, potentially changing the voice of the singer in the process.
What is the issue the speaker encounters when trying to convert male vocals generated by Udio using Music F's convert voice feature?
-The speaker finds that the transition using the male voice is not quite there, with some glitchiness and artifacts present in the converted voice, possibly due to issues with lower registers.
What is the speaker's opinion on the future competition between Udio and Suno?
-The speaker believes that Udio's current capabilities are pushing Suno to compete harder, which is beneficial for consumers as it drives innovation and improvement in AI music generation.
What is the speaker's final verdict on Udio's performance in the comparison?
-The speaker concludes that Udio is currently better than Suno in many ways, despite the longer generation time and current limitations on the number of simultaneous generations.
Outlines
🎵 Head-to-Head Comparison of AI Music Generation Tools
The paragraph introduces a comparison between two AI music generation tools, Udio and Tuno. The author explains that they will use the same prompts for both tools and compare the results. The first generation from both tools is discussed, with a focus on the quality and expressiveness of the vocals produced. The author notes that while Tuno is known for its expressive vocals, Udio offers higher fidelity, which could be advantageous for music producers looking to extract and improve vocal samples. However, Udio seems to generate only about 30 seconds of music at a time, compared to Tuno's longer song generations.
📝 Analyzing Lyrics and Fidelity in AI-Generated Music
The author delves into the importance of lyrics in AI-generated music and the challenges of producing good lyrics. The second generation from both Udio and Tuno is evaluated, with attention to the lyrics' quality and originality. The author expresses a desire for better lyrical content and notes that both tools struggle with this aspect. The fidelity of the music is also discussed, with the author hoping that Udio's higher quality output will allow for better vocal sample extraction and improvement.
🎧 Critiquing the Mixing and Singer Selection in AI Music
The paragraph focuses on the critique of the mixing quality in the AI-generated music and the selection of singers. The author finds that Tuno tends to have obnoxious transient harmonics, while Udio's clarity of voice is praised. The author also discusses the ability to customize the singer's gender in both tools and notes that Udio seems to adhere more closely to the specified singer gender. The paragraph ends with a critique of Udio's struggle with the electronica genre and the author's decision to not listen to the rest of the Udio-generated song due to its poor quality.
🔄 Experimenting with Voice Features and Music Production
The author describes their workflow with AI-generated music, including the use of stem splitters and voice conversion features. They express excitement about the potential of Udio's higher fidelity for male voice extraction and improvement. The author also discusses their intention to experiment with different voice features, such as adding reverb and converting female voices to male, to enhance the quality of the AI-generated music. The paragraph concludes with the author's plan to further test and improve the quality of male vocals generated by AI tools.
🛠️ Exploring AI Music Tools and Their Capabilities
The author explores the capabilities of different AI music tools, including Music F and Emy, which are competitors to Udio. They discuss the features offered by these tools, such as stem splitting, voice extraction, and the ability to create new voices by mixing them. The author also shares their experience with using these tools to produce male vocals and their intention to continue testing and refining their methods for creating high-quality AI-generated voices. The paragraph ends with the author's anticipation of future updates and videos focusing on AI and professional music production.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI music
💡Udio
💡Suno
💡Fidelity
💡Lyrics generation
💡Music production
💡Vocal extraction
💡Indie pop song
💡Zombie apocalypse
💡Electronica
💡Rapture
Highlights
Today's comparison is between Udio and Suno, two AI music platforms.
Both platforms are known for their AI-generated music and evolving tech.
The test prompt is for a heartfelt indie pop song about surviving a zombie apocalypse.
Udio's first generation has a higher fidelity than Suno's output.
Suno's vocals are expressive but often reuse similar material.
Udio offers the option to use your own lyrics, similar to Suno.
Udio's generation time is longer, possibly due to quality differences.
An upcoming app, Audio SR, aims to improve AI music fidelity.
Suno's low fidelity limits the use of male vocals in final products.
Udio's higher quality makes voice extraction potentially easier.
Suno's custom mode allows for specific prompts, like requesting a female singer.
Udio sometimes struggles with adhering to specified singer gender.
The AI-generated lyrics can sound different when sung, changing their perceived quality.
Udio's voice inflection and human-like singing is impressive.
The reviewer plans to use Udio's higher fidelity for male voice experiments.
Udio's generated music can be extended and improved in music production software.
The reviewer concludes that Udio is currently better than Suno in many ways.
Competition between Udio and Suno will drive innovation in AI music production.