"This Is Where We Draw The Line!" | Iran Attacks Israel
Summary
TLDRIn a heated debate moderated by Piers Morgan, a panel consisting of comedian Dave Smith, conservative commentator Deborah Lee, Palestinian American activist Nadin Kiswani, and Iranian British American activist and lawyer El Labon discussed the escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, particularly focusing on the recent military exchanges and their implications. The conversation covered a range of topics, including the sovereignty of nations, the role of the United States in the conflict, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and the strategies employed by Israel in response to perceived threats from Hamas and Iran. The participants expressed divergent views on the legitimacy of military actions, the impact of global perception on the conflict, and the potential for a peaceful resolution. The debate underscored the complexity of the situation and the deep divisions in opinions regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Takeaways
- ๐ The debate revolves around the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, with a focus on the recent military actions and their implications for the region.
- ๐ฏ Israel's attack on an Iranian consulate in Syria, which resulted in the death of military leaders, has been seen by some as a significant provocation and a potential catalyst for further conflict.
- ๐ข Iran's retaliatory strike was viewed by some as a theatrical move to appease domestic audiences, while others argue it signifies a real escalation in hostilities.
- ๐ค There is a debate over whether the international response, including the lack of U.S. support for further Israeli offensive actions, will deter future aggression.
- ๐ก๏ธ The effectiveness of Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system is highlighted as a key factor in minimizing casualties during the missile exchange.
- ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ Calls for a unified standard when it comes to national sovereignty and the right of countries to defend themselves, with implications for the broader Middle East conflict.
- ๐จ Concerns are raised about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with discussions about the impact of ongoing violence and the international community's response.
- ๐ค There is a call for a global coalition to support diplomatic solutions and to address the root causes of conflict, rather than perpetuating a cycle of violence.
- โ The role of the United States and other international powers in influencing the conflict is discussed, with differing views on their effectiveness and intentions.
- ๐ A discussion on the potential long-term effects of the conflict on regional stability and global perceptions of the parties involved, including the risk of further isolation for Israel.
- ๐๏ธ An appeal for peace and the need for leadership that genuinely seeks a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, drawing parallels to other historical conflicts that have been resolved.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the debate?
-The main topic of the debate is the ongoing situation with Iran and Israel, including the recent attacks and the potential for escalating conflict in the region.
What was the reason for Israel's attack on the Iranian consulate in Syria?
-Israel attacked the Iranian consulate in Syria in response to what they believed was collaboration with Hezbollah and other groups, following an incident on October 7th.
What was the nature of Iran's response to Israel's attack?
-Iran responded with a direct attack on Israel, launching 300 missiles, which is considered a significant escalation and a departure from their previous tactics.
What does Dave Smith believe about the potential for a wider war?
-Dave Smith believes that there is a threat of a wider war in the region and that the situation has been tense since October 7th. He also suggests that Iran's response was largely for domestic consumption and to save face.
What does Deborah Lee argue about Israel's right to defend itself?
-Deborah Lee argues that it is extremely important for a sovereign country like Israel to defend itself against attacks, and she emphasizes the importance of deterrence in the Middle East.
What is Nadin Kiswani's view on the situation in Gaza?
-Nadin Kiswani believes that there is a genocide happening in Gaza and criticizes Israel's actions, comparing it to the actions of Nazi Germany and apartheid South Africa.
What does El Labon emphasize about the Islamic Republic's activities?
-El Labon emphasizes that the Islamic Republic has been training, sponsoring, and funding its proxies to attack Israel, and criticizes the distortion of the narrative that frames Iran as a victim.
What is the role of the Iron Dome in protecting Israel?
-The Iron Dome is a missile defense system that has protected millions of lives in Israel by intercepting incoming rockets and missiles, preventing widespread casualties.
What does the debate highlight about the complexity of the Israel-Palestine conflict?
-The debate highlights the deep divisions and differing perspectives on the conflict, with discussions on sovereignty, the role of the United States, the impact of Iran, and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
What is the significance of the protests in the United States regarding the conflict?
-The protests in the United States reflect the global concern and solidarity with the Palestinian cause. However, the debate also touches on the potential negative impact of certain protest actions, such as chanting 'death to America'.
What does the discussion imply about the need for leadership committed to peace?
-The discussion implies that for a peaceful resolution to be achieved, there needs to be a significant shift in leadership on both sides with a genuine desire to forge peace, similar to what eventually happened in Northern Ireland.
Outlines
๐ Introduction to the Debate on Middle East Conflicts
The video script opens with a discussion led by Piers Morgan, focusing on the tensions between Iran, Israel, and the ongoing situation in Gaza. The panel consists of various perspectives including comedian Dave Smith, conservative commentator Deborah Lee, Palestinian American activist Nadin Kiswani, and Iranian British American activist and lawyer El Labon. The conversation begins with the recent military actions and debates whether the missile exchange was a show of force or a sign of escalating conflict. Dave Smith suggests that the Iranian response was primarily for domestic reasons and that wider war can be avoided with careful diplomacy.
๐ฐ Analysis of Israel's Military Actions and Regional Implications
The second paragraph delves into the debate over Israel's attack on an Iranian consulate in Syria and the subsequent Iranian missile response. The panelists discuss the potential ramifications for the region, with some arguing that Israel's actions are a matter of sovereignty and self-defense, while others condemn the violence and call for an end to the conflict. The discussion touches on the international response, the role of the United States, and the importance of deterrence in maintaining peace in the Middle East.
๐ฅ The Impact of Missile Defense and the Iron Dome
In this section, the conversation shifts to the effectiveness of Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system and its role in protecting Israeli civilians. The panelists express gratitude for the technology that has saved lives, but also debate the broader implications of military force and deterrence. The discussion also addresses the international support for Israel following the missile attacks and the importance of considering the perspectives of all involved nations and their sovereignty.
๐ International Involvement and the Yemen Crisis
The fourth paragraph discusses the international community's involvement in the region's conflicts, particularly the United States' role in the Yemen crisis. The panelists debate the concept of 'whataboutism,' where deflecting from one issue to another is criticized. They also address the humanitarian crisis in Yemen, the involvement of Saudi Arabia, and the broader implications of foreign policy on regional stability.
๐ฝ Reactions to Protests in America and Freedom of Speech
This part of the script focuses on the protests in the United States, where pro-Palestinian demonstrators have been vocal about their opposition to U.S. support for Israel. The panelists debate the limits of free speech, the impact of disruptive protests on public opinion, and the appropriate ways to express dissent. The conversation also touches on the use of provocative chants and slogans during protests and the potential backlash against such tactics.
๐ Addressing Hamas, Terrorism, and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
The sixth paragraph zeroes in on the role of Hamas in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The panelists discuss the challenges Israel faces in dealing with a terrorist organization embedded within a civilian population. They debate whether Israel's military actions are justified and explore alternative strategies for addressing the threat posed by Hamas, including special operations and targeted assassinations.
๐๏ธ The Cycle of Violence and the Need for Peaceful Resolution
In the final paragraph, the discussion centers on the cycle of violence and the potential for a peaceful resolution to the conflicts in the region. The panelists express their views on the need for new leadership with a genuine desire for peace. They draw parallels with the Northern Ireland conflict and emphasize the importance of diplomatic efforts and political will in achieving a lasting peace.
๐ค Conclusion and Thanks to the Panelists
The video script concludes with the host, Piers Morgan, thanking the panelists for their contributions to the debate. He highlights the importance of continued dialogue and the hope for future discussions that can further explore the complex issues surrounding the Middle East conflicts.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กSovereignty
๐กDeterrence
๐กIron Dome
๐กProxy War
๐กHuman Shields
๐กTerrorism
๐กGenocide
๐ก
๐กRetaliation
๐กRegional War
๐กInternational Relations
๐กHumanitarian Crisis
Highlights
Debate on the ongoing situation between Iran, Israel, and Gaza, highlighting the complexity of the conflict and international relations.
Discussion on the recent attack by Israel on an Iranian consulate in Syria and Iran's direct response.
Analysis of whether the conflict is escalating towards a major war in the region.
Dave Smith's perspective on the threat of a wider war and the potential for it to be political theater.
Debate on the sovereignty of Israel and its right to defend against missile attacks.
Deborah Lee's argument on the importance of deterrence in the Middle East and the role of force against terror groups.
Nadin Kiswani's view on the situation in Gaza, the humanitarian crisis, and the world's response to it.
El Labon's frustration with the narrative distortion and the need for a clear understanding of the conflict's roots.
Discussion on the role of the United States in the conflict and its stance on Israel's actions.
The impact of the conflict on global views of Israel and the potential for a shift in alliances.
Concerns about the humanitarian crisis in Yemen and the role of regional powers in exacerbating the situation.
The role of freedom of speech in protests and the controversy over chants like 'death to America'.
Debate on the legitimacy of Hamas and the impact of Israel's strategy in creating the environment for extremist groups.
The argument that Israel's actions in Gaza may fuel the ideology that drives groups like Hamas.
Discussion on the potential for peace and the need for leaders with a genuine desire for peace on both sides.
The importance of addressing the core issues that lead to the conflict, such as the treatment of Palestinians and the occupation.
Final thoughts on the possibility of peace and the need for a new approach to resolve the longstanding conflict.
Transcripts
well welcome to a special Piers Morgan
uncensored debate about the ongoing
situation with Iran and Israel and of
course what's still going on in Gaza uh
passions are running high on both sides
so I brought people from both sides
together today to have a free and Frank
and fearless conversation about exactly
what is going on right now so I've been
joined by the comedian podcaster Dave
Smith first time we've met in public uh
in person great to see you Dave very
nice to meet you the conservative
commentator Deborah Lee great to see you
the Palestinian American activist Nadin
kiswani good to see you back Nadin and
joining us uh remotely from uh Los
Angeles is El Labon who's an Iranian
British American activist and lawyer uh
and it's the front page of the New York
Post today uh after a very powerful
video that you put on uh social media
which has really captured people's
attention uh in which you lambast people
for only now waking up to what has been
going on in Iran uh so welcome to all of
you uh Dave let me start with
you a lot of stuff has been going on in
the last few days and at the center of
it is the fact that Israel attacked a uh
consulate that belongs to Iran in Syria
killing uh some military leaders from uh
Iran and Iran having signaled it would
do this responded with tremendous Force
but also uniquely directly at Israel
from Iran which we haven't seen before
uh some people think this was just
theater that they warned people
deliberately so that this would just be
something that would be for maybe for
the domestic audience at home others
think it actually signals a real
escalation here and we might be
teetering if we're not Camp careful on a
major war in the region what's your take
on this well okay there's no question
that there is a threat of a wider war in
the region and that's been true long
before these missiles went off that's
really been true since October 7th um
you have a lot of Dynamics with the
houthis Hezbollah um and of course Iran
this was clearly theater I mean there
they gave 72 hours warning this was this
was very similar to after Trump uh
assassinated solomani and they sent that
missile at the American base didn't kill
anybody it did not seem like they were
trying to Iran has even come out and
said after this we're done we we
responded they felt I think they needed
to to save face to their own domestic
population and one of the best things
that Donald Trump ever did in his
presidency was after that response from
Iran he said fine you can have the last
word we took out the person we wanted to
take out we didn't lose any any of our
people um Biden clearly has signaled
that he doesn't want Israel to respond
to this Israel would be insane to
respond to Iran as they've claimed
they're going to do why would they be
insane because listen at this point
Israel has lost much of the world uh
over this war and they'd basically be
waving the finger at the US uh to do
this they're they'd be risking a wider
War uh Joe Biden has signaled that
they'd have to go at it alone that he's
not going to back them up on any
offensive attack against Iran what you
know every pro-israeli person that I've
ever met has always talked about uh the
Peril of Israel that we're this tiny
little country surrounded by all of
these hostile Nations and there's so
much anti-Semitism in the world if
that's the case why would you
intentionally try to make this a broader
Regional War okay Deborah why I think
that it's extremely important for a
sovereign country to defend themselves
300 ballistic missiles if that was sent
to any other country the United States
where I'm a resident and I'm a citizen
only a citizen of the United States if
we receive 300 ballistic missiles
overnight even if it took 10 hours 3
days to get here that country would
cease to exist and it's only a question
of sovereignty when it comes to Israel
which in and of itself is an anti-israel
ideology that oh why should Israel be
able to defend themselves I do not want
a bigger War I do not want it to get
bigger I don't want more people dying I
want this war to come to an end as fast
as possible but I think that this can't
be the norm that oh you can just send
ballistic missiles at Israel hundreds
and nothing happens you can just get
away with it I think deterrence is the
most powerful tool we have in the Middle
East and that Terror groups only listen
to force they don't listen to Peaceful
the the ultimate deterrent here was that
Iran fired off 300 missiles and
absolutely nothing apart from one or two
apparently landed anywhere near Israel
one little girl was was badly injured
which is appalling but in terms of what
they were trying to do perhaps with
these missiles and what actually
happened it was a failure so wasn't it
proof that actually unlike October the
7th Israel's defenses held up very well
and wasn't it also extremely pertinent
to this that you had Jordan racing to
help them you had Saudi Arabia racing to
help them you had the UK you had France
and other countries I mean there was a
big Coalition immediately helping Israel
to repel these missiles isn't that in
itself a a pretty clear deterrent that
you can try but you're not going to get
anywhere I mean I think it was great to
see the countries come together in
defense of Israel but this is more of a
testament to the Iron Dome than anything
else thank God for the Iron Dome it is
amazing technology it protected millions
of lives if this did not exist these
Rockets could have fallen they don't
know if it's falling on an Arab family a
Jewish Family a Jews family they just
want to kill people and thank God that
Israel was able to defend themselves
what do you think Israel should do I
mean right now I think they need to do
something I'm not a military adviser but
I think something along the lines that
says you cannot mess with us we are a
sovereign country you can't send 300
ballistic missiles and get away I think
that would either be a threat of force
or I think threatening is rightfully so
right now that would be the first step
saying hey you do this again or we're
going to weaponize we're going to get
ready to come for you you don't touch us
we will destroy it we will blow your
regime off the map and can I just I mean
if we're talking about the principle of
a sovereign country is Iran a sovereign
country is Syria a sovereign country
because Israel bombs Syria every couple
months with impunity okay that in of
itself is not true but Israel we mean
that's a fact Israel BS Syria whenever
they feel like of terrorism they
supported they not they support Kamas
they support no evidence evidence that
they supported October 7 that has
nothing to do with their sov listen
wellist it is a separ attack and this is
you brought up the issue of a sovereign
country and then as soon as I ask the
question we're pivoting to other things
first of all our CIA has said that they
believe the Iranians the Iranians were
shocked on October 7th so there's no
evidence has been provided they were
Israel it's the Islamic regime and the
Islamic Republic does not well the
Islamic that's part of it but the
Islamic Republic has made life a living
hell for Iranians for many years Iranian
Jews live there there was a GL okay I'm
sorry I understand I understand what
you're saying yeah nobody's argu support
I'm not arguing that Iran is not a
repressive government that's not my
argument but you're making the case that
there's the the argument is a sovereign
country and so that's why Israel is in
defense of this I'm just saying is Syria
a sovereign country because as you noted
Pierce that's where this started well
let me bring in Nadine here we we've had
some fiery debates before about what's
happening in Gaza but on this do you
have any defense for what is happening
in terms of what Iran did I mean I agree
with your framing I think that the
ultimate message of deterence was sent
by Iran it was ultimately um their
Embassy their sovereignty that was
attacked at first they actually had two
people that were killed by these um
missiles that Israel sent and they
didn't kill anyone you know just as um
the yemeni people who have been seizing
these ships um are are sending a message
that you know let in humanitarian Aid
and we'll let these ships pass through
it's not about um killing people it's
why why should Israel just accept people
firing rockets at them well why should
anyone accept Israel firing Rockets come
to that part of the debate in a minute
but why should Israel ever accept people
firing rockets at them whether it's the
hoties whether it's Hezbollah whether
it's Hamas whether it's Iran why should
they just in principle they are I mean
you you put it right there they are a
tiny country surrounded by I mean I once
interviewed Netanyahu in Jerusalem and
he took me to a map behind his desk and
it was quite a powerful thing he did
performative but powerful he said watch
and he put his hand on Saudi Arabia he
put his hand on Iran his hand on Egypt
he went round all the big countries
bordering uh Israel and then he took his
thumb and he went watch and he put his
little thumb where Israel was surrounded
by these huge handprint countries people
in Israel feel pretty vulnerable because
of that and they feel vulnerable because
they're constantly being attacked now I
will come to the other part of that
which is how they responded to October
the 7th I will do that with you but just
on this alone if a country like uh Iran
decides to fire 300 missiles AI what are
you supposed to do as a country I mean
isra the Israelis are clearly trying um
to bring in the US to a regional a
broader Regional War this is what their
MO was from the beginning that wasn't
the question I asked you I think that's
that's what they were trying to do
though no I'm asking you what what
should Israel do in response to what
happened to them what's the correct
response for any country if you're hit
with 300 missiles I think they need to
understand that the world is growing
tired angry and frustrated with the
countless deaths that we're seeing
happening in Gaza tens and tens of
thousands of people so many children uh
people are starving to death people are
freezing to death they need to
understand that the world is angry and
they need to put an end that had nothing
to do with why Iran launched 300
missiles at Israel it was nothing to do
with happened in Gaza except that Israel
would say they attacked the Consulate in
Syria as a part an attack on people they
believed were collaborating with herass
over October the 7th so it does have it
to do with it it does but that wasn't
the main focus was a Revenge attack for
what happened at the consulate you know
I think it wasn't about actually what's
going on in Gaza you know I don't think
that there is really anything left to
debate here aside from the fact that
there is a genocide going on it's been
going on for 6 months Israel is a rogue
state
just as Nazi Germany just as aart South
Africa
was just be honest you want us to take
it you want us to all die to these
missiles that's the honest answer that
you're avoiding here if you can't say it
is wrong for a country to send 300
ballistic missiles to innocent civilians
I could say that they can you say it was
wrong for Israel to put Gazza Under
Siege and blockade for the better part
of the last two decades for them to
murder 40,000 people for to Mur 15,000
children okay your numbers are coming
from Kamas for 1948
by why is it not onas to the Palestinian
people let me let me bring in El who's
trying to get in here elica you are the
only actual Iranian amongst us you were
born there so what is your response to
what you've heard so far well I'm just
I'm really frustrated with the complete
Distortion of the narrative like you're
disc you're talking about these strikes
in Syria first of all not being on an
Iranian Embassy so let's just get our
fact straight it was on a military base
that was next to the Embassy why is the
military base there why is the Islamic
Republic um making Syria vulnerable to
these attacks you want to talk about
bombs on Syria guess who's doing that
guess who's doing that it's the Islamic
Republic by using other countries as a
base so it makes Syrian people
vulnerable to that so let's not just act
like there's strikes on there for no
reason second of all you talk about
civilians people were actually killed in
that strike which targeted senior irgc
leaders who were meeting with Hezbollah
meeting with Hezbollah to do what
exactly cuz let's just talk about what's
been happening for the past six months
much less the past uh four decades which
is that we have seen October 7th okay
which was an act of War let's be clear
um let's dispel this narrative that
there's no evidence that the Islamic
Republic supported that it's been
reported over and again it was reported
in the Wall Street Journal
um Republic no let me finish I'm not
done what do you think that the Islamic
Republic is training sponsoring funding
its proxies for what do you think they
are funding its proxies for in in in in
Israel in um uh sorry in Gaza in in uh
Yemen in in Lebanon and all of that all
of that to strike Israel um on October
7th every single day since October 7th
firing Rockets into Israel and then when
there was a strike on irgc leaders
planning a meeting with Hezbollah to
further attack Israel you want to turn
around and say oh people were killed
guess who was killed the people that
were killed are the people when um the
Islamic Republic struck Israeli
embassies in different countries actual
civilians okay not military senior
personnel and guess who else would have
been killed if it wasn't for the Iron
Dome 300 Rockets you're talking about
hundreds and thousands of deaths so
you're relying on the fact that there
was an Iron Dome to protect the fact
like oh well nothing really happened a
lot happened and a lot would have
happened if Israel didn't have to invest
so much into protecting its civilians
and you can't rely on that as a defense
and not only that let's go back to talk
about when you talk about that that the
strike on solomani and you say oh well
nothing really happened they just did a
small retaliatory whatever that's not
the case they actually let's talk about
flight 752 when they shot down a plane
from tan going to Ukraine killing many
many many innocent people on that plane
because you know what the Islamic
Republic does it takes it out on its own
people that's what they do and that's
what they're doing right now they're CRA
cracking down on Iranian women in the
streets to show that they're the big bad
wolf because they know that they don't
want any smoke with Israel but they want
to remind you who they are and guess who
they're taking it out on on the Iranian
people and this is where we draw the
line we draw the line at this vocal
support for the Islamic Republic Being
Framed as they as the victim in this
story that they have been orchestrating
for decades orchestrating terrorism
Regional stability for decades you want
to talk about the houis that are
fighting for Freedom how dare you how
dare you not acknowledge what the
houthis are doing in Yemen do you do you
listen to yemenis and their voices and
what they have to say they are being
terrorized they are being starved they
are being killed a a a young Arabic
woman is on death row right now in Yemen
for criticizing the hoodis are you
speaking about their rights when you
talk about Yemen people fighting for
freedom in the Red Sea how are you going
to call Freedom takers Freedom Fighters
that's a good let me just jump in I want
to bring in the others because you've
raised some very interesting points
there Dave you were bristling at some of
it though what well look I just think we
have to have one standard here and this
is kind of the point I was getting to
with national sovereignty like let's if
we're going to talk about things let's
have one standard if our concern is over
what's been happening to the people in
Yemen as you said what the houthis are
doing to them do you know what's been
happen happening to the people of Yemen
over the last8 years has been the number
one humanitarian crisis in the world in
the war that Saudi Arabia launched on
them with full backing from the United
States of America both uh uh Obama and
Trump through every day of his
administration we were refueling their
fight their their fighter jets okay we
were very implicated in that war so okay
if you care about horrible things
happening to the people of Yemen then
you better be criticizing Saudi Arabia
and the United States of America this
war just ended over in in the last year
the eight years previous to that were
that's a
whataboutism let me tell I'm not
finished you said you weren't finished
no you said you weren't finished before
I'm not finished now what aboutism is a
word that people yell when you call them
out on their hypocracy I'm saying let's
have one standard abut not I can explain
to you why it's a whataboutism what what
are we teenagers what does this word
even mean I'm putting this into
historical so that you understand okay
or what aboutism deflect from the issue
that was presented the issue that I
presented to you okay it's a logical
fallacy what I presented to you was the
fact that the Yemen people do not
support the houthis and you you brought
up well what about the fact that they
don't support this and this I didn't
bring thatt the way I didn't know hold
on let's just be clear here no let me
explain so you understand I'm not saying
that let me finish my sentence okay go
ahead what I told you is that the yemeni
people have been vocal if you would
listen to their voices you don't listen
to their voices because they the radical
and extremist voices are the ones that
are propped up okay by the algorithm by
the media and the people on the ground
that are telling you they don't support
the the houthis
that's support resistance I'm not uh
certainly I I don't know exactly I'm
open to the idea that there are a lot of
people in Yemen who do not support the
houthis I'm not defending the way the
houthis treat their people I'm not
defending the way the Iranian government
treats their people what I'm saying is
that if we're going to not be Hypocrites
here and we're criticizing them because
we're concerned about how the people of
Yemen are treated where is this uh
criticism for the much bigger disaster
that's been caused in that country over
the last eight years and if you want to
talk in terms of how the people feel it
is as close to unanimous as you're going
to get across the Muslim world that they
are opposed to what Israel is doing to
God and the idea that they wouldn't want
the houis standing up to the isra hang
on some G hang on to say
what Iran has done here it's actually
achieved what many think was almost
impossible is it's made people gravitate
back to Israel right it has brought
people together with Israel because they
thought well actually look at this they
300 rockets launched from Iran uh
clearly presenting a massive threat to
the people of Israel right at the moment
when you're right Global support for
Israel was beginning to fade away pretty
quickly so I I would argue that what
what Iran has done here is a very
self-defeating thing if the desire was
to try and continue to isolate Israel
for what it's been doing in Gaza this is
the worst thing that Iran could have
done listen there there might be
something to that and I'm not saying
that this necessarily was a great
strategic decision um but I don't think
you're right about that I mean look the
when you say the United people or pushed
back toward Israel I think what you're
thinking about is the fact that all of
these countries that you just pointed
out all helped Israel defend themselves
but the truth is that it's not actually
that shocking that Jordan and Saudi
Arabia and look the Sunni Gulf States or
Jordan's not a Gulf State but these
Sunni States here they're American sock
puppets we we buy them off for billions
and billions of dollars and prop them up
they do but what the wider World sees
Dave they just see Israel coming under
attack from Iran and they see two major
Arab countries Jordan and Saudi Arabia
racing to support their defense at a
time when much of the Arab world is in
Rage about what has been happening in G
in terms of how Israel has executed its
attack on uh on Hamas in in response to
October the 7th so you know I I would
agree with you there's no doubt that
that support for Israel had been
dissipating fast but when I saw the
reaction to what happened here I was I
was struck by two two major Arab
countries going well we know this is
unpopular what's happening in Gaza but
this is something we're going to support
Israel but I think you might be
conflating the actions of governments
with popularity amongst the people I
mean I'm I'm open to evidence on this
but I do not see any real realignment
Happening Here look Israel has by the
way they've been conducting this war and
the brutality of it they have been
alienating more of the world than I've
ever seen them alienate in my lifetime
to the point where 50% of democratic
voters believe this is a genocide this
is a major problem for Joe Biden's
re-election campaign and this is just
however you feel about there's no doubt
that they have turned much of the world
away from them and I'm just not seeing
any evidence that roet shot down change
Democrat so pro Israel before October
7th well yeah but that's that's also a
part of an argument let me ask you much
more so the scenes that we've been
seeing in America in the last 48 hours
these concerted protests on major
Bridges around America right through New
York and Washington and so on what we've
been seeing people in Michigan chanting
death to America you know pramas slogans
being chanted and so on what do you make
of this I think it's absolutely hurting
one I think it's just obviously
disgusting to harm regular everyday
civilians the people that are on the
bridge just trying to get to work to the
airport their kids to doctor's
appointments they have nothing to do
with the war that's going on in the
Middle East they have no way to affect
it you're not going to change their mind
by making them miss a flight or anything
like that and I think it's really
hurting their cause that they're
inconveniencing people we've seen this
for months the Christmas tree lighting
the Thanksgiving Day Parade anything
that would bring joy to Americans it
seems like they want to protest to
disrupt it and that's not going to make
Americans more favorable and personally
I live in Manhattan and I've heard many
of I've seen many of the protests and
I've heard them chanting we want another
inata even claiming things like that
that's not getting anybody to support
you that is not helping you separate
yourselves from people you accuse of
committing a genocide which is a Li and
of itself I think that it's really
harming their cause and Americans at
least the people in New York are very
fed up with this stop making our lives
inconvenient you have a freedom to
protest you don't have a freedom to
block traffic and ruin people's lives
that are just trying to get on day okay
n you've been on a lot of these protests
hang on one second come to you but
Nadine you've been on these protests
including
yesterday when I hear people chanting
death to America in the heart of America
that sends a shutter down my spine I'm
not even American and we're seeing
similar things happening in the United
Kingdom um I believe passionately in
peaceful protest no doubt about that at
all but when I see what's been going on
with sections and there sections it's
not the whole uh protest crowds it's
unnerving to see this kind of hatred for
America from people living here
um well I'd just like to start off by
saying that the protests have still been
peaceful you know phrases and actions
that have been taken at the protest
haven't actually been violent they
haven't harmed anyone and I don't think
we should focus what do you think about
people chanting death to America as they
did in one video clip last I think that
that's just a phrase maybe said by an
individual well no the whole crowd began
joining in I didn't see that so this guy
this guy said it and then the whole
crowd began chanting it what would you
condemn that I'm here to talk about the
entire you're here to my questions
actually would you condemn what they
were chanting death to America I think
we should condemn Palestinians actually
being killed okay I think that that's
not the question I'm asking you so I
will ask you about Gaza um but on the
question I asked you would you condemn
people in America chanting death to
America what do you say I don't condemn
how people choose to express their rage
verbally I don't condemn that because at
the end of the day the reason they're
saying that is because the US is sending
the tax dollars and the weapons that are
actually you support do you support them
chanting death to America I don't I
don't chant that myself so I don't know
why you're trying me in this type of I'm
asking you to condemn it you don't want
to I'm asking I'm asking do you
therefore should I assume you support
them chant those aren't the chance that
I would I would
personally you must either hang on I
just want to pin you on this you must
surely either condemn it or support it
no you don't need to Neal to America
terrifying how How would how would
anyone do do you think if they went to
AA Enchanted death to Palestine with
Hamas terrorists
nearby I don't I don't understand these
hypotheticals there's actual because
they're very lucky they're very lucky to
be doing a context that you're removing
I'm going to explain the context they
are doing this in a country where
they're very fortunate where freedom of
speech is not just tolerated but
encouraged if you tried to do death to
Palestine as a chance with a crowd in
the middle of Gaza with Hamas people
nearby I suspect you would be killed
pretty quickly
do you are you saying that people who
chant death to America should be killed
in the US or should they be able to
express their freedom of speech I'm
saying First Amendment
right I don't think saying death to
America is a free it is freedom
but come to you one second I'll be very
quick with this but I'm just gonna say I
hate to jump over to the other side of
this issue now but I've just seen this
so many times on your show when you have
someone who I agree with by the way I'm
totally against this this war by Israel
I think they should just stop it I think
the treat byas okay anyway fact matter
yeah the fact is Israel is doing this to
Gaza right now and that's what I'm I'm
literally trying to agree with you about
something get your fact straight just
staying that October 7th happened I'm
saying right now I right now okay right
now Israel is is fighting this War I
think their treatment of the
Palestinians since before the state of
Israel has been totally inexcusable but
I see this on your show all the time
where you'll be asking someone who I
agree with like you broadly on this
topic do you condemn this everybody's
always running away from it and I think
it just makes their argument so much
weaker absolutely stop chanting death to
America stop blocking streets stop
referring to Hamas as Freedom Fighters
you are doing such a disservice to the
people you're trying to advate toally
agree sometimes like these these people
always
say always with respect to you but you
always say things like you're trying to
trap me no I'm not I'm just literally
asking you to condemn something that any
normal rational Humane person it is by
the way instinctively just it is freedom
of speech I mean in America you have the
right to say whatever you want but it's
a stupid thing to say it's a wrong thing
to say you can condemn October 7th you
can condemn Hamas you can condemn these
excesses and still say I think what
Israel is doing to the Palestinian
people is wrong and they ought to stop
it
ient yes I'm I'm happy to condemn plenty
of things on both sides of this let me
bring in El you've been trying to let me
jump in there first of all first of all
when we talk about freedom of speech in
this country per the Constitution we
know that there's not absolute freedom
of speech okay there are nine discret
pockets of exceptions to freedom of
speech one of them being incitement of
violence okay so let's not act like it's
just willy-nilly that you could can go
out there and say death to America
second of all and is very specific
instance this is cover this this is full
intellectualism you're using your legal
background to try to trample People's
First Amendment do not interrupt me
you've been speaking and I have
something to say about this when you say
death to America okay it is with blight
insensitivity about the fact that we are
living in a nation of immigrants do you
understand that we are living in a
nation of immigrants where people come
here to escape you all happy for me to
myself I'm happy to disant myself from
slans like death to America but I think
it's important to understand that the
context of condemning Palestinian
resistance condemning the people in
Gazza paves the way way for this
genocide to be carried out and that's
exactly what we you need to let me my
sentence okay cuz you're not letting me
sentence I don't want to but that was a
significant concession there by Nadine
that she if if we wanted her to distance
herself she will and she has so okay I
accept that when you talk about when you
talk about death to America you are
talking about death to a democratic
nation that designed protect no you
cannot keep interrupting me you cannot
keep interrupting me that's extremely
disrespectful you're talking about death
to a nation that is designed to protect
a nation of immigrants with the rights
and the Privileges afforded to them from
the Constitution who have escaped
countries that were killed for exercises
exercising those rights to free speech
okay this is not a perfect system don't
get me wrong this is not a perfect
system but it's it's a system that we
are working on it is a system that I've
worked in the criminal justice system
for this exact reason okay to improve
this system that I've been working on
for the past 12 years but at no point am
I going to turn around and say death to
a nation that is the only place that we
have for this type of progress for this
type of um protection of minority
communities this type of protection for
immigrants okay and it it's not a
perfect democracy and when it fails we
take to the streets when it failed for
Rodney King what did we do we took to
the streets and the doj got involved and
we made it happen What would happen if
you took to the streets in Iran to
protest the lynchings that they're doing
the many evil St style lynchings that
they're doing every day you would be
killed so you do not have the nerve to
say death to America this is not a
suzero game you absolutely can support
the people of Palestine you absolutely
can stand up for their rights their
right to statehood their right to
Freedom their right to sovereignty as I
do but you do not have the right to
cross those lines and corrode our
Democratic Society that protects us yeah
I agree with you um okay let's just
finally end with just moving just to
Gaza um because obviously it's been
slightly put to one side while we've
been having this uh this ongoing thing
with
Iran Israel's position has been very
clear on this from the start they want
to eliminate Hamas Hamas is dedicated to
getting rid of Israel um we know that
because after October the 7th a
spokesman went on television and
brazenly said if we can do it again and
again and again we will that represents
a clear public existential threat to
Israel and to everyone living there how
does Israel get rid of Hamas who want to
eliminate them in any different way to
the way they're doing it allbe it with
the catastrophic death toll with the
appalling humanitarian crisis and
everything when you have a terrorist
organization embedded amongst a civilian
population with all the tunneling that's
now being found and so on is there any
other way they could do this so if you
accept that they have a justification in
getting rid of a terror group that wants
to destroy them is there a different way
to do this uh well the short answer is
no I don't think there is um I think
look you have to understand what creates
the environment where you have this type
of death cult like Hamas these these
terrorists and look this is not again
this is stuff that the CIA talks about
it was General mistal right okay you
just complained about interrupting right
so anyway it was General mistal no my my
my my page Froze all right oh oh sorry I
apologize was friendly fire It was
friendly fire look General mccristal
this was not like an anti-war Dove right
this was the guy who was running the war
in Afghanistan a serious General he was
the one who coined the term Insurgent
math right what's 10 minus 2 20 because
it when you kill two of the insurgents
they all had Brothers they had fathers
they had friends and they all join up
and so what Israel is doing here is
guaranteeing that there will be more
Hamas or Hamas like groups look here's
the truth okay Israel um and this has
been widely reported uh in The Times of
Israel in heret in the new yor York
Times all over the place uh in the
Jerusalem Post Benjamin Netanyahu
embarked on a strategy of propping up
Hamas it was a very cynical strategy I
don't think that's I don't think that's
even disputable I mean and why but the
most important thing is the because he
wanted to split the the Palestinians
into two groups and why Palestinian
Authority in Hamas because he felt that
it would be better for Israel's security
no no listen well that's really what he
was he said in his own words so that we
never have to give them a state he
propped up I don't think I listen I
don't think Netanyahu has ever one of
the two-state solution I don't think
actually for the last 10 years he's even
shown any desire to have peace but I
just want to say this is where the
Israeli justification completely falls
apart because they're saying well look
we got this terrorist group Hamas
they're hiding in these tunnels and sure
it is awful that we got to kill all
these babies in order to get them but we
just have to do it but when you know
that you actually propped up this group
so that those babies would never get
their freedom to begin with then I'm
sorry you lose that excuse okay Deborah
think it's quite a powerful argument I
do I think Netanyahu at the end of all
this he's got to go right because what's
clear from Israelis is that they support
what he's doing with the war but they
don't support him for what happened
October the 7th they think he should be
held accountable they want him out yeah
I think just addressing your argument
that the framework of everything matters
Israel is not just going in killing
babies Kamas hides among civilians makes
it even harder and Israel is an
obligation about
dang to get their hostages back they're
excuse me watch yourself Israel needs to
get their hostages back they have 180
plus a little bit less now who are still
sitting there and it's crazy that we
have Americans there and Joe Biden's
doing nothing but as far as BB Netanyahu
goes it's I think there's two different
sides here there are people who are
pro-israel who want to see him step down
and there are people who are pro
Palestine who want to see him step down
the pro-israel side for me if it was my
children that were being held hostage
for over six months nobody could stop me
from going in there and getting them
back you know I don't have children so I
think it's a little easier to say that
now giving the circumstances but I just
cannot imagine what these families do
you think Israel should finish the job
absolutely I think Israel should do
anything even if that means attacking
Rafa where there are one and a half
million people many of whom are refugees
listen I I get your point and I do have
children so I can you know put myself in
that situation if I had children who
were being held hostage or children who
were killed on on October 7th I'm sure I
would just want to kill everybody all
I'm asking people to do is just also put
themselves in the other shoe th those
people in Gaza they also have children
and their children have been dying for
many many years also think you I also
think I thinkes
which is completely right but I think
they made a good point about the
ideology that you can kill as many Hamas
terrorists as you like but you won't
kill the ideology in fact what you might
be doing there been a big fear of mine
in the last few months is of what Israel
may be doing in its desire to get rid of
Hamas with all the collateral damage of
all the innocent civilians particularly
children because of the makeup of Gaza
being 50% children that actually what
they're going to do is fuel the ideology
which drove Hamas in the first place
exactly and who's killing and starving
the hostages hang on it's Israel that's
killing its own hostages it's Israel
that's kill starving its own hostages
and even the world Central kitchen
workers that you know the world was
rightly outraged about but where is that
outrage when it comes to 40,000
Palestinians uh and I think ultimately
as long as there is oppression there
will be resistance to it and I said this
on your show before uh in order to truly
kill Palestinian resistance they're
going to have to kill every single
person inza what they're how does this
end you know and I also wanted to
mention something um just generally
about what was spoken before you know
the where's Daddy AI program where they
literally follow um people from Hamas
until they get home and then bomb them
with their families inside of their home
so the idea that you know Hamas is using
human Shields is absolutely ridiculous
and I need to refute that and it by
there's no doubt that Hamas has built
tunnels around hospitals around dayare
centers you know children's centers
schools and so on there's no doubt
they've done that uh they don't even
make a pretense of it so I just don't
think that's an arguable Point anymore
and when it comes to killing people who
are around their families hamash showed
absolutely zero care at all in who they
indiscriminately brutally murdered
brutally murdered were brutally murdered
by the Israeli Army itself the missiles
that caused the
oober L the truth is there were people
who were killed in crossfire but that's
still on Hamas I mean you still can't
like take the blame off of them the
truth is that Hamas does not mind
Palestinians dying what Hamas was trying
to provoke this is what terrorism always
is Right Osama Bin Laden hit us on 911
he said this in his own words it's not
because he thought that would take down
the United States of America he wanted
to lure us into a war in Afghanistan
like he did to the Soviets to bankrupt
us and what does Hamas want in this case
they want Israel to do what they know
Israel was going to do actually I this
is where I think look I don't have uh
all the hard evidence for this but it
seems to me what might be very likely
that's going on here is that Iran's
tentacles are behind a lot of this that
they helped Hamas do what they did in
terms of arming them and giving them
money and so on and that they wanted
something that would draw Israel into
what they would see as a massive over
response and the same with the rocket
firing into Israel is they're trying to
go Israel and potentially United States
into okay what they would see as an over
response which might play into their
hand well maybe you're right I haven't
seen evidence to to say that that I'll
come to you for the final word yeah
well let D finish this point listen I
haven't seen evidence to suggest that it
wouldn't shatter my worldview if I did
but if that's the case what's the answer
then right it's like what what do we do
to fight Osama Bin Laden you don't get
bogged down in a 20-year regime change
War fight them with Special Operations
just like Israel always did before
Netanyahu they never treated the
terrorism problem as a military problem
it was always assassination campaigns
special ops you don't you don't uh just
recklessly kill innocent people in this
way because then you turn Global opinion
against yourself
I think you make a good point let's come
to you because you are front page of a
New York Post today your rhetoric about
this has really resonated with people
let me give the final word to you and I
I think this is the thing that I
struggle with is just there's always
such a distortion of the narrative that
it's really frustrating and hard to
correct look all of us here should be on
the same page this is not a zero sum
game we should all be in alignment in
these things we don't need to be in
opposition you know we we all agree that
Netanyahu isn't going to be in favor of
a two-state solution we all agree that
we need um um um statehood and
sovereignty for both of these nations we
all agree that we want peace between
Israel Palestine and Iran some of these
things are really inappropriately phased
when you say things like you know when
you kill Palestinians you're just
creating a new generation of terrorists
this is extremely racist would you ever
say that about American kids that were
orphaned would you say oh these will
probably grow up to be terrorists that
is the bigotry of low expectations let's
talk about what it really is let's talk
about what is always omitted from the
conversation which is the that have a
group of empowered fundamentalists and
terrorists who take child soldiers and
they say look what happened to you you
know your suffering your oppression that
was caused by this and the only way to
resolve that is for you to become a
martyr it's just like any child
trafficking ring that is at the core of
what creates this fundamentalist
extremist ideology you know and so yes
of course you can say that um anyone
who's oppressed is going to resist but
this is not resistant going into a
different country and slaughtering 1,00
innocent civilians by no stretch is
resistance and so if you want to talk
about you know what's going to happen to
this next generation of extremely
traumatized kids in Gaza I think we can
all acknowledge that just all of the
tragedies that we've witnessed the the
answer is that let's guide them out of
these um extremist fundamentalist
trafficking when they TR to they're mow
down when they try to protest they're
mow down when they go on hunger strike
nobody cares every single Avenue
diplomatic or otherwise political social
that Palestinians have taken in order to
achieve our freedom have either been
ignored people have become imprisoned
for it so what option is left for
Palestinian people other than resist do
you know what I I think I said this to
you before I remember to wrap it up
here's what I say really
quickly we run out of time we've run out
of time but here's what I would say I I
just think that I remember it's a
different situation but some ways there
were lots of parallels the Northern
Ireland Wars which went on for many
decades and everyone thought were
completely unsolvable intractable
because you had two completely different
uh sets of ideologies and they did
eventually get to peace and they they
got there by having leaders who actually
came with a desire for peace and at the
moment I don't see that with anyone in
the Hamas leadership I don't see it with
anyone in the Netanyahu government and
what you need you need to have
completely freshly ship on both sides
that actually has a genuine desire to
forge peace and I hope and pray that the
one thing that comes out of this is that
that you get the right leaders with the
right mentality because Norman Ireland
now is a pretty peaceful place to be and
it was a place where when I grew up they
were bombing British Mainland left right
and center and I never thought that
would be possible in my lifetime but it
was so thank you listen good to see you
Nadine good to see you Deborah good to
see you Dave good to see you elica I
really appreciate the debate uh and and
hope we can do it again thank you very
much thank you so much
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
"You're LYING!" Piers Morgan Hosts Debate On Iran, Israel And Hamas
"I Donโt Need Your Pity!" Rahma Zein vs Mosab Hassan Yousef
HEATED Israel Debate: Destiny Vs. Omar Baddar
โI'm Laughing In Your FACEโ Cenk Uygur vs Emily Schrader On Iran-Israel
Piers Morgan vs Ben Shapiro | On Israel-Hamas, Candace Owens And More
โYouโve NO IDEA How Many Youโve Killed?โ Piers Morgan vs Avi Hyman