Treadmill Abuse Murder Trial: Victim's Pediatrician Testifies

COURT TV
2 May 202465:39

Summary

TLDRThe trial of Christopher Gregory, accused of first-degree murder in the death of his 6-year-old son, Cory, continues in New Jersey. The prosecution alleges that Gregory forced Cory to run on a treadmill at dangerously high speeds, leading to his death. Video evidence shows the child falling multiple times. The defense argues that the child's injuries could have been caused by playing football. The pediatrician, Dr. Nancy Deacon, who examined Cory a day before his death, testified about the boy's condition, noting his reluctance to speak about his injuries. She observed numerous bruises in various stages of healing, which raised concerns about possible abuse. Despite the child's seemingly normal physical presentation, Dr. Deacon recommended immediate hospitalization, suspecting internal injuries. The trial is ongoing, with the defense facing an uphill battle due to the graphic nature of the video evidence and the child's tragic death.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ“ The trial is focused on Christopher Gregory, who is accused of first-degree murder for the death of his 6-year-old son, Cory, after forcing him to run on a treadmill at high speeds.
  • ๐ŸŽฅ The state presented video evidence showing Cory falling multiple times on the treadmill, which was played in court and was described as difficult to watch.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš•๏ธ Pediatrician Nancy Deacon testified, noting that Cory appeared relatively normal during her examination, except for several bruises, which raised concerns about potential abuse.
  • ๐Ÿฅ Despite the initial normal appearance, Corey was sent to the hospital for further evaluation due to the doctor's concerns about the nature and extent of the bruises.
  • ๐Ÿค” The defense argues that the doctor had to prod Corey for information, which could imply that his disclosures were not entirely spontaneous.
  • ๐Ÿง The judge considered the doctor's testimony, including the issue of whether she had to encourage Corey to speak, which could affect the credibility of his statements.
  • ๐Ÿšจ There was a discussion about the hearsay rule and the admissibility of statements made by Corey regarding what his father told him, which could be considered double hearsay.
  • ๐Ÿคจ The defense suggested that the case might be difficult to defend due to the graphic nature of the video evidence and the boy's injuries, hinting at a potential uphill battle for the defense team.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ถ The jury was presented with the timeline of events, including the doctor's examination and Corey's subsequent hospitalization, which occurred shortly before his death.
  • ๐Ÿง  The doctor's expertise and teaching background were highlighted during the cross-examination, emphasizing her experience in pediatric medicine.
  • ๐Ÿ“ The doctor's testimony included a detailed account of the various bruises and their stages of healing, suggesting that some of the injuries could not be easily explained by a single incident.

Q & A

  • What are the charges against Christopher Gregory?

    -Christopher Gregory is charged with endangering the welfare of a child and first-degree murder in the death of his 6-year-old son, Corey.

  • What was the reason given for forcing the child to run on the treadmill?

    -Christopher Gregory believed his son, Corey, was too fat, which led him to force the child to run on the treadmill at impossibly high speeds for a child of that age.

  • What evidence was presented by the state?

    -The state presented video evidence showing Christopher Gregory forcing Corey to run on the treadmill, causing the child to repeatedly fall down.

  • What did the pediatrician observe during Corey's examination?

    -The pediatrician observed that Corey appeared very sick, had multiple bruises, and showed no signs of distress such as difficulty breathing or fever. However, the child was later found to have serious internal injuries.

  • How did Corey's mother react during the examination?

    -Corey's mother appeared very worried and concerned during the examination. She became tearful when Corey explained how he got his bruises.

  • What was the doctor's impression of Corey's condition after the examination?

    -Despite Corey presenting with multiple bruises, the doctor's initial impression was that his vital signs were normal for his age, and he did not show signs of immediate distress or severe injury.

  • What was the issue with the doctor's testimony regarding the hearsay rule?

    -The doctor's testimony included information that Corey had told her about what his father told him, which could be considered double hearsay. This created a problem as it may not be admissible in court.

  • What was the defense's strategy in cross-examining the doctor?

    -The defense questioned the doctor's methods, particularly her need to prod Corey for information, which could suggest that the child was reluctant to speak and that the information provided might not be entirely reliable.

  • What was the judge's ruling on the doctor's testimony?

    -The judge decided not to strike the doctor's testimony but gave a curative instruction to the jury, advising them on how to consider the doctor's testimony, especially regarding the statements made by Corey.

  • What was the significance of the doctor's testimony about the different stages of healing in Corey's bruises?

    -The doctor's testimony about the varying stages of healing in Corey's bruises suggested that the injuries were not all from a single incident. This could imply that Corey had been subjected to repeated abuse.

  • What action did the doctor take after examining Corey?

    -The doctor recommended that Corey be taken immediately to the hospital for further evaluation and expert care, as she was concerned about his condition and potential internal injuries.

Outlines

00:00

๐Ÿ˜€ Treadmill Abuse Trial Begins

The video script opens with a live report from Court TV about the treadmill abuse murder trial in New Jersey. Christopher Gregory is on trial for forcing his 6-year-old son, Cory, to run on a treadmill at high speeds, which led to the boy's death. The state has presented video evidence of the abuse, and a pediatrician who examined Cory the day before his death is set to testify. The report also mentions the challenges in proving the direct causation between the abuse and Cory's death.

05:03

๐Ÿ˜ข Testimony of the Pediatrician

The pediatrician, Nancy Deacon, recounts her examination of Cory, noting his calm demeanor and the various bruises on his body. She describes the boy's vital signs as normal for his age, but her observations raised concerns that led her to inquire further about the bruises. Cory's mother became emotional during the examination, and the doctor's testimony is expected to be a critical part of the trial.

10:03

๐Ÿค” Legal Analysis of the Case

A legal expert, Nima Amini, discusses the difficulty of defending Christopher Gregory due to the graphic nature of the video evidence. The expert suggests that the defense may struggle to argue that something else caused Cory's death, given the special duty of care a parent has to a child. There is also discussion about a potential plea deal that was offered but rejected by the defendant.

15:07

๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚๏ธ The Doctor's Examination and Injuries

Doctor Deacon provides a detailed account of her physical examination of Cory, noting his normal activity and the presence of bruises and other injuries. She explains the medical assessment process and the importance of understanding the child's condition. The doctor's testimony is interrupted for a sidebar discussion about the admissibility of certain statements made by Cory regarding his father's actions.

20:07

๐Ÿšซ Legal Ruling on Hearsay Evidence

The judge rules on the admissibility of hearsay evidence in the trial. The judge decides not to strike the doctor's testimony but provides a limiting instruction to the jury regarding the weight they should give to certain statements made by the child to the doctor. The judge emphasizes the importance of considering the child's credibility and the circumstances under which the statements were made.

25:08

๐Ÿ” Detailed Examination Findings

Doctor Deacon continues her testimony, detailing the results of her comprehensive examination of Cory, which included checking his eyes, ears, throat, heart, lungs, abdomen, and musculoskeletal system. She describes the various bruises and injuries she observed, noting their locations and appearances. The doctor's thorough examination provides crucial evidence for the trial.

30:11

๐Ÿฅ Urgent Hospital Referral

Doctor Deacon testifies about her recommendation to immediately take Cory to the hospital following her examination. She expresses her concerns about the severity of his injuries and the need for further evaluation. The doctor's actions and her communication with the emergency department physician and a caseworker from Child Protective Services highlight her seriousness in addressing the child's condition.

35:12

๐Ÿค” Cross-Examination and Medical Background

The defense begins its cross-examination of Doctor Deacon, focusing on her medical education and experience. The doctor outlines her qualifications, including her osteopathic medical degree, internship, and pediatric residency. The defense also questions the doctor about her teaching role and her approach to patient interviews, aiming to establish her credibility and the reliability of her examination.

40:13

๐Ÿ“ Documentation and Patient Interaction

The cross-examination continues with the defense questioning Doctor Deacon about her documentation practices and her interaction with Cory during the examination. The defense highlights that the doctor had to prod Cory for information, which could suggest reluctance on the child's part. The discussion touches on the importance of patient safety and the ethical considerations in medical examinations.

45:21

๐Ÿง Assessing the Bruises and Injuries

Doctor Deacon is questioned about the various bruises and injuries she observed on Cory's body. She explains the different stages of healing and the implications they have for determining the timing of the injuries. The doctor's assessment provides insight into the nature and severity of the abuse and helps the jury understand the timeline of events leading up to Cory's death.

50:24

๐Ÿˆ The Football Incident and Inconsistencies

The defense challenges Doctor Deacon on the inconsistencies between Cory's statements about playing football and the timing of his injuries. The doctor explains her understanding of Cory's activities and the healing process of the bruises. The cross-examination aims to cast doubt on the doctor's findings and the prosecution's narrative of the case.

55:32

๐Ÿ›‘ Closing Remarks and Testimony Conclusion

The video script concludes with the end of Doctor Deacon's testimony. The doctor's evidence is a critical part of the prosecution's case, and her detailed account of Cory's injuries and her professional assessment provide a strong foundation for the charges against Christopher Gregory.

Mindmap

Keywords

๐Ÿ’กTreadmill Abuse

Treadmill abuse refers to the act of forcing someone, in this case a child, to run on a treadmill at speeds that are dangerous or inappropriate for their physical capabilities. In the video, it is a central theme as the defendant, Christopher Gregory, is accused of such abuse towards his son, Cory, which is believed to have resulted in fatal injuries.

๐Ÿ’กFirst-degree Murder

First-degree murder is a classification of homicide that involves premeditation and is considered the most serious level of murder. In the context of the video, Christopher Gregory is charged with first-degree murder for the death of his son, Corey, implying that the prosecution believes the act was intentional and planned.

๐Ÿ’กEndangering the Welfare of a Child

This is a legal term referring to a crime where the safety, well-being, or welfare of a child is put at risk by the actions or inactions of an adult. In the video, it is one of the charges against the defendant, suggesting that his actions of forcing his son to run on a treadmill at high speeds were seen as jeopardizing the child's welfare.

๐Ÿ’กPediatrician

A pediatrician is a medical doctor who specializes in the health and care of infants, children, and adolescents. In the video, the pediatrician's testimony is crucial as she examined Corey the day before his death and her observations and findings provide insight into his health condition, which is directly related to the charges against the defendant.

๐Ÿ’กVital Signs

Vital signs are a group of clinical measures that are used to determine the state of a person's health, including blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. The video mentions that Corey's vital signs were normal, which is significant as it contrasts with the severity of the injuries he later sustained.

๐Ÿ’กChronic Abuse

Chronic abuse refers to ongoing and repeated instances of maltreatment or neglect. The video discusses the child being a victim of chronic abuse, which is an important aspect in the case as it speaks to the pattern of behavior by the defendant and the severity of the situation.

๐Ÿ’กMedical Examination

A medical examination is a thorough health assessment performed by a medical professional. In the video, the medical examination of Corey by the pediatrician is detailed, highlighting the process and findings that are pivotal to understanding the child's condition and the potential implications for the trial.

๐Ÿ’กBruises

Bruises are marks on the skin caused by blood vessels breaking under the skin due to an injury. The video script describes various bruises on Corey's body, which are a key piece of evidence in the case as they suggest physical trauma and potential abuse.

๐Ÿ’กCross-Examination

Cross-examination is a legal process in which a witness is questioned by the opposing counsel to test the credibility and accuracy of their testimony. In the video, the pediatrician is undergoing cross-examination, which is a critical part of the trial where the defense can challenge her observations and the implications of her findings.

๐Ÿ’กDouble Hearsay

Double hearsay refers to a statement made by one person, repeated by another, and then used as evidence. It is typically inadmissible in court due to concerns about its reliability. In the video, there is a discussion about the potential issue of double hearsay related to what Corey told his father, which he then relayed to the doctor.

๐Ÿ’กChild Protective Services (CPS)

CPS refers to the government agencies responsible for the protection of children from abuse and neglect. In the video, it is mentioned that CPS was already involved with the family, indicating that concerns for the child's welfare preceded the fatal incident.

Highlights

Christopher Gregory is on trial for first-degree murder, accused of forcing his 6-year-old son, Cory, to run on a treadmill at dangerously high speeds, leading to the child's death.

The prosecution presented video evidence showing Cory repeatedly falling while running on the treadmill.

Corey's pediatrician testified, describing the boy's condition the day before his death, noting he appeared very sick but was breathing easily.

The doctor observed that Cory seemed reluctant to discuss his injuries, which were later attributed to playing football.

Cory's mother appeared very worried and concerned during the examination, indicating a potentially tense home environment.

The defense argued that the doctor's testimony could be prejudicial, as it suggested the child's reluctance to speak might imply abuse.

The judge ruled that the doctor's testimony would not be struck but would be given a curative instruction to the jury.

The doctor detailed the various bruises and injuries found on Cory's body, indicating different stages of healing.

The defense questioned the doctor's methods and the thoroughness of her examination, suggesting potential gaps in the medical assessment.

The doctor clarified that she recommended immediate hospitalization for Cory due to the severity and number of bruises.

The judge considered the hearsay rule and its exceptions in relation to Cory's statements about the injuries.

The defense suggested that the bruises could have resulted from normal childhood activities, not necessarily abuse.

The prosecution argued that the extent of Cory's injuries were inconsistent with normal play, indicating a pattern of abuse.

The doctor's testimony highlighted the discrepancy between Cory's outward appearance and the severity of his injuries.

The defense faced challenges in countering the graphic nature of the video evidence showing Cory's treatment on the treadmill.

The judge's decision to allow cross-examination on the doctor's testimony could impact the jury's perception of the case.

The doctor's credibility and the reliability of her observations are central to the case's outcome.

Transcripts

00:07

Welcome back to court TV live

00:08

on Michael Aiello we're

00:09

switching gears now to go to

00:09

New Jersey for the treadmill

00:12

abuse

00:14

murder trial. Defendant

00:14

Christopher Gregory is accused

00:15

of forcing his 6 year-old son

00:16

Cory to run on a treadmill that

00:17

really impossibly high speeds

00:19

for

00:20

a kid that young because he

00:23

believed the boy was

00:24

too fat. Gregor is charged with

00:25

endangering the welfare of a

00:26

child and first-degree murder

00:28

in the death

00:30

of Corey. The state presented

00:30

video evidence of Gregor

00:31

forcing Korean the treadmill in

00:33

his

00:36

apartment gym. Showing Corey

00:37

repeatedly falling down as he

00:38

tried to stand it was really

00:39

tough to watch now the

00:40

pediatrician who examine Corey

00:42

the day before

00:43

he died took the stand today,

00:44

so we'll get you inside the

00:45

courtroom for that testimony.

00:45

โ™ช

00:46

โ™ช

00:47

>> That's where I saw him in

00:50

the exam.

00:53

>> Duration of course exam.

01:09

And the way that Iran was

01:09

anybody else in the room other

01:12

than that people use crack.

01:18

Initial observations of.

01:31

>> Entered the room

01:32

who are.

01:32

>> He was sitting on the exam

01:33

table that's where he had been

01:36

brought to get his

01:38

blood pressure take and his

01:39

polls and his breathing and its

01:42

pull stocks. She was sitting

01:43

there and he's the nurse asked

01:45

him to take his. His shirt off

01:48

Syria's pants on sure often use

01:51

sitting quietly on the

01:52

exam table. And his mother was

02:11

>> Yeah so you as it is

02:13

a pediatrician.

02:13

>> And you know are we rely not

02:16

just on what patients say, but

02:17

how they are acting because

02:18

they don't you know kids don't

02:21

just.

02:22

Tell you something to hurt a

02:25

lot of times

02:28

they don't no word they don't

02:29

so you are always looking from

02:31

the very start how are they

02:32

sitting.

02:32

>> And how are they looking you

02:35

know do

02:36

they look.

02:37

>> Learn are they looking right

02:38

up for you to set up and I for

02:41

retouching patient. We're

02:42

looking for everything we can

02:45

get. It in quietly.

02:51

He was breathing easily.

02:52

He didn't look in any distress.

02:58

And he just looked very sick.

03:08

Contained likes do it.

03:19

so she was sitting and she just

03:20

she looked just very worried.

03:23

>> And and concerned.

03:35

>> he would look at her you

03:36

know, and they they would to

03:37

just look at the you know each

03:39

other as I

03:40

asking first the mother now now

03:41

and getting to find out from

03:44

them.

03:47

Is the history like

03:48

what was happened you know what

03:52

are you

03:53

worried about so when we call

03:56

in and she was listed as the

03:57

independent historian, she was

03:57

the one to give its history as

03:58

parents to you know huge.

04:01

>> First.

04:10

>> So based I I do give

04:13

children

04:14

a chance say what hurts or

04:17

what's up. Problem or.

04:19

What happened it's an injury

04:22

how did you get her.

04:25

So I did that

04:32

at first didn't want to say.

04:41

so I explained to him

04:47

in order to help him I had

04:50

to know.

04:50

>> How we got her what

04:53

happened.

04:57

>> Still Lee has a 2 so I I

05:03

>> we're I think we can help

05:06

you do it if we.

05:09

What happened and complete and

05:12

don't worry

05:15

I need to know so I can.

05:31

And so you you on it.

05:34

And she says them.

05:44

>> You said that he got

05:47

the the trusted arm

05:48

and hip.

05:51

>> Bruises and

05:52

the forehead. It's great when

05:52

he was playing football outside

05:55

on turf.

05:58

And he said that his dad was

05:58

teaching him how to catch a

06:01

football.

06:04

And when I I'm Kristen for

06:07

there and that.

06:12

He said he orders is when he

06:15

fell from a treadmill.

06:25

Was he was explaining this.

06:29

His mother tear it up and

06:32

started

06:34

to tip cry and then he got

06:37

tearful as well.

06:51

I you know with the nurses had.

06:56

Found out and he had a normal

06:57

blood pressure he had what we

07:00

call a pulse ox curse

07:02

that test the finger this

07:05

oxygen level is 98% and his

07:09

pulse rate

07:09

was 90 and his respiratory rate

07:12

was 24.

07:15

His temperature was as normal.

07:18

No fever. And I considered

07:21

vi those vital

07:24

signs North. For his age.

07:34

Yes and I'm noticing here when

07:36

I say he might first thing is

07:39

generally just look

07:40

at that and then you had normal

07:41

activity a normal interaction.

07:43

I got it. He said tell

07:46

me that.

07:50

I have something in my notes

08:05

>> all right so that it will

08:06

issue leads to a sidebar about

08:06

exactly what you can tell this

08:09

jury about what Corey

08:11

told her about what his dad

08:12

told him this of course creates

08:14

a situation of double

08:17

hearsay so that created a

08:17

problem we'll take a break

08:18

right now when we come back

08:19

we'll have more testimony from

08:21

top they're

08:24

Nancy deacon but first we do

08:25

have this quick programming

08:25

note the defendant in the Idaho

08:26

student murders case Brian told

08:27

over will be back in court for

08:29

a

08:30

big hearing.

08:31

>> The judge will hear

08:31

arguments over the state's

08:32

motion to close an upcoming

08:35

hearing on a defense motion

08:36

to compel it's related to

08:39

certain evidence that the

08:40

defense wants prosecutors to

08:41

turn over that hearing at

08:41

01:00PM eastern tomo

09:25

>> All right folks before we

09:26

head back to court, let's bring

09:26

back in president of the West

09:29

Coast

09:31

trial lawyers. Uber Amani Nima

09:31

been done to get your

09:34

impression of this History is

09:35

on already seeing a very very

09:38

it's just an

09:39

awful video of how this this

09:39

defendant treated his But there

09:42

are some issues I think you

09:44

with causation as to whether

09:47

you know that abuse and the

09:48

abuse that we're learning about

09:49

can be attributed to the actual

09:50

cause of death we want to get

09:53

your thoughts on this.

09:54

>> It's a really tough case to

09:55

defend Michael, you know I

09:55

understand they're going to

09:58

argue that you

10:01

know obviously coy didn't die

10:03

immediately you had to seizures

10:04

and some neurological issues

10:06

and so forth but the video

10:07

is so.

10:10

>> You know and.

10:12

>> I mean just watching it

10:15

right now and him by his side,

10:18

I mean just it's

10:18

so bad, I don't think the

10:19

defense is going to be able to

10:21

do anything with this in to

10:24

argue that.

10:25

Something else cause poor

10:28

Corey's

10:30

death. It's really an uphill

10:31

battle on surprise that this

10:33

defendant didn't take them

10:35

30 year offer. I wouldn't be

10:37

surprised that when he's

10:38

convicted he gets sentenced to

10:38

life because someone treating

10:39

their own child like this.

10:42

It's really beyond the pale so

10:45

very tough case

10:46

to defend maybe they're going

10:48

to try to get a lesser included

10:49

like manslaughter. But when you

10:49

have a special duty like this

10:51

to a child. It's very hard to

10:54

win a case like this.

10:56

>> Yeah I agree and what what

10:57

name is talking about is the

10:57

state offered a deal to this

11:00

stuff and that

11:00

they said. If he pled guilty he

11:04

would just get 30 years and he

11:04

would be eligible for parole

11:07

for those

11:08

30 years. But he chose not to

11:08

he wanted to take this to trial

11:11

and again with this type

11:13

of evidence. I don't know I

11:14

struggle to I agree with me but

11:18

the other thing is because of

11:18

this video. It really lets the

11:22

jury viewers who

11:22

are watching I believe that

11:23

this guy's really capable of

11:23

anything so when you hear this

11:26

little boy tell

11:26

this doctor that he had all

11:29

these bruises which seemed to

11:31

match up up with where some of

11:31

these injuries were a bruise on

11:32

his side had a lacerated liver

11:35

playing football.

11:36

It was a bruise or some kind of

11:38

area discoloration in his chest

11:39

he had a lacerated heart I can

11:43

just envision. How this guy

11:43

would have wanted to teach his

11:46

son how to play football on

11:49

turf and causing all those

11:50

bruises. It is a very very

11:52

short leap to think of the type

11:54

of things that he was doing to

11:54

that poor little boy under the

11:55

guise of trying to teach him

11:56

how to play football that

11:56

resulted in these deadly

11:59

injuries.

12:02

>> Do I agree, Michael mean it

12:02

poor coy suffer from so many

12:03

injuries and the defense is

12:06

really not going to have and

12:09

the other possible are

12:10

reasonable X the nation,

12:10

especially in the video is so

12:12

graphic and so violent. The

12:15

young boy

12:17

6 years old and the way he was

12:19

treated and frankly, I mean I

12:20

don't think anyone's going to

12:21

understand what anyone would do

12:23

that this child

12:25

is overweight and needs to run

12:26

of the treadmill, it just

12:26

doesn't make any sense. This is

12:29

a sick and

12:30

twisted father, and I think

12:31

we're going to be a pretty

12:34

quick conviction for Michael.

12:34

>> Yeah would have to agree I

12:36

think what he was functioning

12:37

from was a place of anger and I

12:38

think he was taking out

12:41

whatever angry at the

12:42

world that at the mom and

12:43

whoever else was involved was

12:44

taking it out on this poor

12:45

little 6 year-old boys just

12:46

it's just a real climate change

12:47

all right stand by we'll get

12:50

back to court now with the

12:51

judge and the attorneys were

12:52

actually discussing initial

12:52

outside the presence of the

12:53

jury and this involves again as

12:55

I the

12:57

double hearsay of words that

12:58

were set to Corey by his father

12:59

that he tells the doctor can

13:00

cheat all tell the jury those

13:01

things let's get back in

13:04

school.

13:07

>> Work hard to.

13:14

>> That existing state of mind.

13:21

Under 8 o 3 C 3.

13:52

>> suspect is what that means.

13:55

Well those reasons it should

13:59

not.

14:11

Reference

14:12

to consistent. PRI of Henri

14:12

court to get additional

14:15

information.

14:27

>> Our first interview with the

14:31

West.

14:31

You see. I'm sure you know 3 C

14:35

3.

14:40

Font actually could be in this

14:44

good thing. The clerics then

14:45

existing state of mind motion

14:50

Such as intent and motive

14:52

design mental feeling pain in

14:53

your body. This typically means

14:57

that.

14:57

Someone who was present the

15:00

same pain. Lakers are hurts.

15:07

Whether need to position or

15:07

someone else those students are

15:10

generally considered inherently

15:11

unreliable people don't

15:11

complain about something like

15:14

that. At

15:16

the moment. The exception to

15:17

the hearsay rule is based upon

15:20

engaged a lot to do.

15:28

I previously found the child

15:28

seems about because as well as

15:31

what.

15:32

Porches by Nathan Paine work

15:35

program. This is working.

15:38

Question

15:39

anybody's child, the physician

15:41

promise not to tell. Anyone

15:45

what I said. That's not a.

15:48

Saint Matthews.

15:50

The motion sensation physical

15:54

condition. Mind.

16:00

Just a month,

16:01

but it's really more concerned

16:04

about sharing someone.

16:07

I don't want to keep rolling is

16:08

challenging you all are happy

16:09

to play football anymore.

16:12

I know she wants to the that I

16:13

do my father, you know I told

16:16

him I felt Riddle.

16:21

You shouldn't beyond the scope

16:24

of seeking medical treatment.

16:25

Beyond the scope of existing.

16:28

Point.

16:34

So I find that this additional

16:37

should not be admitted to the

16:38

jewelry again a tree but you

16:42

have to.

16:44

This rocking for the second

16:44

issue about the doctor's

16:48

testimony at Route one year.

16:55

That she sure proves and we see

16:57

record high for ball injuries

16:58

and then. He said you was life

17:07

At least inconsistent with that

17:10

jury GQ who usually.

17:12

Fusion is that when what

17:13

happened that she was proud of

17:16

him and she said to him you

17:19

complained that.

17:21

She had to know what happened

17:22

or if you're healthy she could