Treadmill Abuse Murder Trial: Victim's Pediatrician Testifies

COURT TV
2 May 202465:39

Summary

TLDRThe trial of Christopher Gregory, accused of first-degree murder in the death of his 6-year-old son, Cory, continues in New Jersey. The prosecution alleges that Gregory forced Cory to run on a treadmill at dangerously high speeds, leading to his death. Video evidence shows the child falling multiple times. The defense argues that the child's injuries could have been caused by playing football. The pediatrician, Dr. Nancy Deacon, who examined Cory a day before his death, testified about the boy's condition, noting his reluctance to speak about his injuries. She observed numerous bruises in various stages of healing, which raised concerns about possible abuse. Despite the child's seemingly normal physical presentation, Dr. Deacon recommended immediate hospitalization, suspecting internal injuries. The trial is ongoing, with the defense facing an uphill battle due to the graphic nature of the video evidence and the child's tragic death.

Takeaways

  • πŸ“ The trial is focused on Christopher Gregory, who is accused of first-degree murder for the death of his 6-year-old son, Cory, after forcing him to run on a treadmill at high speeds.
  • πŸŽ₯ The state presented video evidence showing Cory falling multiple times on the treadmill, which was played in court and was described as difficult to watch.
  • πŸ‘©β€βš•οΈ Pediatrician Nancy Deacon testified, noting that Cory appeared relatively normal during her examination, except for several bruises, which raised concerns about potential abuse.
  • πŸ₯ Despite the initial normal appearance, Corey was sent to the hospital for further evaluation due to the doctor's concerns about the nature and extent of the bruises.
  • πŸ€” The defense argues that the doctor had to prod Corey for information, which could imply that his disclosures were not entirely spontaneous.
  • 🧐 The judge considered the doctor's testimony, including the issue of whether she had to encourage Corey to speak, which could affect the credibility of his statements.
  • 🚨 There was a discussion about the hearsay rule and the admissibility of statements made by Corey regarding what his father told him, which could be considered double hearsay.
  • 🀨 The defense suggested that the case might be difficult to defend due to the graphic nature of the video evidence and the boy's injuries, hinting at a potential uphill battle for the defense team.
  • πŸ‘Ά The jury was presented with the timeline of events, including the doctor's examination and Corey's subsequent hospitalization, which occurred shortly before his death.
  • 🧠 The doctor's expertise and teaching background were highlighted during the cross-examination, emphasizing her experience in pediatric medicine.
  • πŸ“ The doctor's testimony included a detailed account of the various bruises and their stages of healing, suggesting that some of the injuries could not be easily explained by a single incident.

Q & A

  • What are the charges against Christopher Gregory?

    -Christopher Gregory is charged with endangering the welfare of a child and first-degree murder in the death of his 6-year-old son, Corey.

  • What was the reason given for forcing the child to run on the treadmill?

    -Christopher Gregory believed his son, Corey, was too fat, which led him to force the child to run on the treadmill at impossibly high speeds for a child of that age.

  • What evidence was presented by the state?

    -The state presented video evidence showing Christopher Gregory forcing Corey to run on the treadmill, causing the child to repeatedly fall down.

  • What did the pediatrician observe during Corey's examination?

    -The pediatrician observed that Corey appeared very sick, had multiple bruises, and showed no signs of distress such as difficulty breathing or fever. However, the child was later found to have serious internal injuries.

  • How did Corey's mother react during the examination?

    -Corey's mother appeared very worried and concerned during the examination. She became tearful when Corey explained how he got his bruises.

  • What was the doctor's impression of Corey's condition after the examination?

    -Despite Corey presenting with multiple bruises, the doctor's initial impression was that his vital signs were normal for his age, and he did not show signs of immediate distress or severe injury.

  • What was the issue with the doctor's testimony regarding the hearsay rule?

    -The doctor's testimony included information that Corey had told her about what his father told him, which could be considered double hearsay. This created a problem as it may not be admissible in court.

  • What was the defense's strategy in cross-examining the doctor?

    -The defense questioned the doctor's methods, particularly her need to prod Corey for information, which could suggest that the child was reluctant to speak and that the information provided might not be entirely reliable.

  • What was the judge's ruling on the doctor's testimony?

    -The judge decided not to strike the doctor's testimony but gave a curative instruction to the jury, advising them on how to consider the doctor's testimony, especially regarding the statements made by Corey.

  • What was the significance of the doctor's testimony about the different stages of healing in Corey's bruises?

    -The doctor's testimony about the varying stages of healing in Corey's bruises suggested that the injuries were not all from a single incident. This could imply that Corey had been subjected to repeated abuse.

  • What action did the doctor take after examining Corey?

    -The doctor recommended that Corey be taken immediately to the hospital for further evaluation and expert care, as she was concerned about his condition and potential internal injuries.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ˜€ Treadmill Abuse Trial Begins

The video script opens with a live report from Court TV about the treadmill abuse murder trial in New Jersey. Christopher Gregory is on trial for forcing his 6-year-old son, Cory, to run on a treadmill at high speeds, which led to the boy's death. The state has presented video evidence of the abuse, and a pediatrician who examined Cory the day before his death is set to testify. The report also mentions the challenges in proving the direct causation between the abuse and Cory's death.

05:03

😒 Testimony of the Pediatrician

The pediatrician, Nancy Deacon, recounts her examination of Cory, noting his calm demeanor and the various bruises on his body. She describes the boy's vital signs as normal for his age, but her observations raised concerns that led her to inquire further about the bruises. Cory's mother became emotional during the examination, and the doctor's testimony is expected to be a critical part of the trial.

10:03

πŸ€” Legal Analysis of the Case

A legal expert, Nima Amini, discusses the difficulty of defending Christopher Gregory due to the graphic nature of the video evidence. The expert suggests that the defense may struggle to argue that something else caused Cory's death, given the special duty of care a parent has to a child. There is also discussion about a potential plea deal that was offered but rejected by the defendant.

15:07

πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈ The Doctor's Examination and Injuries

Doctor Deacon provides a detailed account of her physical examination of Cory, noting his normal activity and the presence of bruises and other injuries. She explains the medical assessment process and the importance of understanding the child's condition. The doctor's testimony is interrupted for a sidebar discussion about the admissibility of certain statements made by Cory regarding his father's actions.

20:07

🚫 Legal Ruling on Hearsay Evidence

The judge rules on the admissibility of hearsay evidence in the trial. The judge decides not to strike the doctor's testimony but provides a limiting instruction to the jury regarding the weight they should give to certain statements made by the child to the doctor. The judge emphasizes the importance of considering the child's credibility and the circumstances under which the statements were made.

25:08

πŸ” Detailed Examination Findings

Doctor Deacon continues her testimony, detailing the results of her comprehensive examination of Cory, which included checking his eyes, ears, throat, heart, lungs, abdomen, and musculoskeletal system. She describes the various bruises and injuries she observed, noting their locations and appearances. The doctor's thorough examination provides crucial evidence for the trial.

30:11

πŸ₯ Urgent Hospital Referral

Doctor Deacon testifies about her recommendation to immediately take Cory to the hospital following her examination. She expresses her concerns about the severity of his injuries and the need for further evaluation. The doctor's actions and her communication with the emergency department physician and a caseworker from Child Protective Services highlight her seriousness in addressing the child's condition.

35:12

πŸ€” Cross-Examination and Medical Background

The defense begins its cross-examination of Doctor Deacon, focusing on her medical education and experience. The doctor outlines her qualifications, including her osteopathic medical degree, internship, and pediatric residency. The defense also questions the doctor about her teaching role and her approach to patient interviews, aiming to establish her credibility and the reliability of her examination.

40:13

πŸ“ Documentation and Patient Interaction

The cross-examination continues with the defense questioning Doctor Deacon about her documentation practices and her interaction with Cory during the examination. The defense highlights that the doctor had to prod Cory for information, which could suggest reluctance on the child's part. The discussion touches on the importance of patient safety and the ethical considerations in medical examinations.

45:21

🧐 Assessing the Bruises and Injuries

Doctor Deacon is questioned about the various bruises and injuries she observed on Cory's body. She explains the different stages of healing and the implications they have for determining the timing of the injuries. The doctor's assessment provides insight into the nature and severity of the abuse and helps the jury understand the timeline of events leading up to Cory's death.

50:24

🏈 The Football Incident and Inconsistencies

The defense challenges Doctor Deacon on the inconsistencies between Cory's statements about playing football and the timing of his injuries. The doctor explains her understanding of Cory's activities and the healing process of the bruises. The cross-examination aims to cast doubt on the doctor's findings and the prosecution's narrative of the case.

55:32

πŸ›‘ Closing Remarks and Testimony Conclusion

The video script concludes with the end of Doctor Deacon's testimony. The doctor's evidence is a critical part of the prosecution's case, and her detailed account of Cory's injuries and her professional assessment provide a strong foundation for the charges against Christopher Gregory.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Treadmill Abuse

Treadmill abuse refers to the act of forcing someone, in this case a child, to run on a treadmill at speeds that are dangerous or inappropriate for their physical capabilities. In the video, it is a central theme as the defendant, Christopher Gregory, is accused of such abuse towards his son, Cory, which is believed to have resulted in fatal injuries.

πŸ’‘First-degree Murder

First-degree murder is a classification of homicide that involves premeditation and is considered the most serious level of murder. In the context of the video, Christopher Gregory is charged with first-degree murder for the death of his son, Corey, implying that the prosecution believes the act was intentional and planned.

πŸ’‘Endangering the Welfare of a Child

This is a legal term referring to a crime where the safety, well-being, or welfare of a child is put at risk by the actions or inactions of an adult. In the video, it is one of the charges against the defendant, suggesting that his actions of forcing his son to run on a treadmill at high speeds were seen as jeopardizing the child's welfare.

πŸ’‘Pediatrician

A pediatrician is a medical doctor who specializes in the health and care of infants, children, and adolescents. In the video, the pediatrician's testimony is crucial as she examined Corey the day before his death and her observations and findings provide insight into his health condition, which is directly related to the charges against the defendant.

πŸ’‘Vital Signs

Vital signs are a group of clinical measures that are used to determine the state of a person's health, including blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. The video mentions that Corey's vital signs were normal, which is significant as it contrasts with the severity of the injuries he later sustained.

πŸ’‘Chronic Abuse

Chronic abuse refers to ongoing and repeated instances of maltreatment or neglect. The video discusses the child being a victim of chronic abuse, which is an important aspect in the case as it speaks to the pattern of behavior by the defendant and the severity of the situation.

πŸ’‘Medical Examination

A medical examination is a thorough health assessment performed by a medical professional. In the video, the medical examination of Corey by the pediatrician is detailed, highlighting the process and findings that are pivotal to understanding the child's condition and the potential implications for the trial.

πŸ’‘Bruises

Bruises are marks on the skin caused by blood vessels breaking under the skin due to an injury. The video script describes various bruises on Corey's body, which are a key piece of evidence in the case as they suggest physical trauma and potential abuse.

πŸ’‘Cross-Examination

Cross-examination is a legal process in which a witness is questioned by the opposing counsel to test the credibility and accuracy of their testimony. In the video, the pediatrician is undergoing cross-examination, which is a critical part of the trial where the defense can challenge her observations and the implications of her findings.

πŸ’‘Double Hearsay

Double hearsay refers to a statement made by one person, repeated by another, and then used as evidence. It is typically inadmissible in court due to concerns about its reliability. In the video, there is a discussion about the potential issue of double hearsay related to what Corey told his father, which he then relayed to the doctor.

πŸ’‘Child Protective Services (CPS)

CPS refers to the government agencies responsible for the protection of children from abuse and neglect. In the video, it is mentioned that CPS was already involved with the family, indicating that concerns for the child's welfare preceded the fatal incident.

Highlights

Christopher Gregory is on trial for first-degree murder, accused of forcing his 6-year-old son, Cory, to run on a treadmill at dangerously high speeds, leading to the child's death.

The prosecution presented video evidence showing Cory repeatedly falling while running on the treadmill.

Corey's pediatrician testified, describing the boy's condition the day before his death, noting he appeared very sick but was breathing easily.

The doctor observed that Cory seemed reluctant to discuss his injuries, which were later attributed to playing football.

Cory's mother appeared very worried and concerned during the examination, indicating a potentially tense home environment.

The defense argued that the doctor's testimony could be prejudicial, as it suggested the child's reluctance to speak might imply abuse.

The judge ruled that the doctor's testimony would not be struck but would be given a curative instruction to the jury.

The doctor detailed the various bruises and injuries found on Cory's body, indicating different stages of healing.

The defense questioned the doctor's methods and the thoroughness of her examination, suggesting potential gaps in the medical assessment.

The doctor clarified that she recommended immediate hospitalization for Cory due to the severity and number of bruises.

The judge considered the hearsay rule and its exceptions in relation to Cory's statements about the injuries.

The defense suggested that the bruises could have resulted from normal childhood activities, not necessarily abuse.

The prosecution argued that the extent of Cory's injuries were inconsistent with normal play, indicating a pattern of abuse.

The doctor's testimony highlighted the discrepancy between Cory's outward appearance and the severity of his injuries.

The defense faced challenges in countering the graphic nature of the video evidence showing Cory's treatment on the treadmill.

The judge's decision to allow cross-examination on the doctor's testimony could impact the jury's perception of the case.

The doctor's credibility and the reliability of her observations are central to the case's outcome.

Transcripts

00:07

Welcome back to court TV live

00:08

on Michael Aiello we're

00:09

switching gears now to go to

00:09

New Jersey for the treadmill

00:12

abuse

00:14

murder trial. Defendant

00:14

Christopher Gregory is accused

00:15

of forcing his 6 year-old son

00:16

Cory to run on a treadmill that

00:17

really impossibly high speeds

00:19

for

00:20

a kid that young because he

00:23

believed the boy was

00:24

too fat. Gregor is charged with

00:25

endangering the welfare of a

00:26

child and first-degree murder

00:28

in the death

00:30

of Corey. The state presented

00:30

video evidence of Gregor

00:31

forcing Korean the treadmill in

00:33

his

00:36

apartment gym. Showing Corey

00:37

repeatedly falling down as he

00:38

tried to stand it was really

00:39

tough to watch now the

00:40

pediatrician who examine Corey

00:42

the day before

00:43

he died took the stand today,

00:44

so we'll get you inside the

00:45

courtroom for that testimony.

00:45

β™ͺ

00:46

β™ͺ

00:47

>> That's where I saw him in

00:50

the exam.

00:53

>> Duration of course exam.

01:09

And the way that Iran was

01:09

anybody else in the room other

01:12

than that people use crack.

01:18

Initial observations of.

01:31

>> Entered the room

01:32

who are.

01:32

>> He was sitting on the exam

01:33

table that's where he had been

01:36

brought to get his

01:38

blood pressure take and his

01:39

polls and his breathing and its

01:42

pull stocks. She was sitting

01:43

there and he's the nurse asked

01:45

him to take his. His shirt off

01:48

Syria's pants on sure often use

01:51

sitting quietly on the

01:52

exam table. And his mother was

02:11

>> Yeah so you as it is

02:13

a pediatrician.

02:13

>> And you know are we rely not

02:16

just on what patients say, but

02:17

how they are acting because

02:18

they don't you know kids don't

02:21

just.

02:22

Tell you something to hurt a

02:25

lot of times

02:28

they don't no word they don't

02:29

so you are always looking from

02:31

the very start how are they

02:32

sitting.

02:32

>> And how are they looking you

02:35

know do

02:36

they look.

02:37

>> Learn are they looking right

02:38

up for you to set up and I for

02:41

retouching patient. We're

02:42

looking for everything we can

02:45

get. It in quietly.

02:51

He was breathing easily.

02:52

He didn't look in any distress.

02:58

And he just looked very sick.

03:08

Contained likes do it.

03:19

so she was sitting and she just

03:20

she looked just very worried.

03:23

>> And and concerned.

03:35

>> he would look at her you

03:36

know, and they they would to

03:37

just look at the you know each

03:39

other as I

03:40

asking first the mother now now

03:41

and getting to find out from

03:44

them.

03:47

Is the history like

03:48

what was happened you know what

03:52

are you

03:53

worried about so when we call

03:56

in and she was listed as the

03:57

independent historian, she was

03:57

the one to give its history as

03:58

parents to you know huge.

04:01

>> First.

04:10

>> So based I I do give

04:13

children

04:14

a chance say what hurts or

04:17

what's up. Problem or.

04:19

What happened it's an injury

04:22

how did you get her.

04:25

So I did that

04:32

at first didn't want to say.

04:41

so I explained to him

04:47

in order to help him I had

04:50

to know.

04:50

>> How we got her what

04:53

happened.

04:57

>> Still Lee has a 2 so I I

05:03

>> we're I think we can help

05:06

you do it if we.

05:09

What happened and complete and

05:12

don't worry

05:15

I need to know so I can.

05:31

And so you you on it.

05:34

And she says them.

05:44

>> You said that he got

05:47

the the trusted arm

05:48

and hip.

05:51

>> Bruises and

05:52

the forehead. It's great when

05:52

he was playing football outside

05:55

on turf.

05:58

And he said that his dad was

05:58

teaching him how to catch a

06:01

football.

06:04

And when I I'm Kristen for

06:07

there and that.

06:12

He said he orders is when he

06:15

fell from a treadmill.

06:25

Was he was explaining this.

06:29

His mother tear it up and

06:32

started

06:34

to tip cry and then he got

06:37

tearful as well.

06:51

I you know with the nurses had.

06:56

Found out and he had a normal

06:57

blood pressure he had what we

07:00

call a pulse ox curse

07:02

that test the finger this

07:05

oxygen level is 98% and his

07:09

pulse rate

07:09

was 90 and his respiratory rate

07:12

was 24.

07:15

His temperature was as normal.

07:18

No fever. And I considered

07:21

vi those vital

07:24

signs North. For his age.

07:34

Yes and I'm noticing here when

07:36

I say he might first thing is

07:39

generally just look

07:40

at that and then you had normal

07:41

activity a normal interaction.

07:43

I got it. He said tell

07:46

me that.

07:50

I have something in my notes

08:05

>> all right so that it will

08:06

issue leads to a sidebar about

08:06

exactly what you can tell this

08:09

jury about what Corey

08:11

told her about what his dad

08:12

told him this of course creates

08:14

a situation of double

08:17

hearsay so that created a

08:17

problem we'll take a break

08:18

right now when we come back

08:19

we'll have more testimony from

08:21

top they're

08:24

Nancy deacon but first we do

08:25

have this quick programming

08:25

note the defendant in the Idaho

08:26

student murders case Brian told

08:27

over will be back in court for

08:29

a

08:30

big hearing.

08:31

>> The judge will hear

08:31

arguments over the state's

08:32

motion to close an upcoming

08:35

hearing on a defense motion

08:36

to compel it's related to

08:39

certain evidence that the

08:40

defense wants prosecutors to

08:41

turn over that hearing at

08:41

01:00PM eastern tomo

09:25

>> All right folks before we

09:26

head back to court, let's bring

09:26

back in president of the West

09:29

Coast

09:31

trial lawyers. Uber Amani Nima

09:31

been done to get your

09:34

impression of this History is

09:35

on already seeing a very very

09:38

it's just an

09:39

awful video of how this this

09:39

defendant treated his But there

09:42

are some issues I think you

09:44

with causation as to whether

09:47

you know that abuse and the

09:48

abuse that we're learning about

09:49

can be attributed to the actual

09:50

cause of death we want to get

09:53

your thoughts on this.

09:54

>> It's a really tough case to

09:55

defend Michael, you know I

09:55

understand they're going to

09:58

argue that you

10:01

know obviously coy didn't die

10:03

immediately you had to seizures

10:04

and some neurological issues

10:06

and so forth but the video

10:07

is so.

10:10

>> You know and.

10:12

>> I mean just watching it

10:15

right now and him by his side,

10:18

I mean just it's

10:18

so bad, I don't think the

10:19

defense is going to be able to

10:21

do anything with this in to

10:24

argue that.

10:25

Something else cause poor

10:28

Corey's

10:30

death. It's really an uphill

10:31

battle on surprise that this

10:33

defendant didn't take them

10:35

30 year offer. I wouldn't be

10:37

surprised that when he's

10:38

convicted he gets sentenced to

10:38

life because someone treating

10:39

their own child like this.

10:42

It's really beyond the pale so

10:45

very tough case

10:46

to defend maybe they're going

10:48

to try to get a lesser included

10:49

like manslaughter. But when you

10:49

have a special duty like this

10:51

to a child. It's very hard to

10:54

win a case like this.

10:56

>> Yeah I agree and what what

10:57

name is talking about is the

10:57

state offered a deal to this

11:00

stuff and that

11:00

they said. If he pled guilty he

11:04

would just get 30 years and he

11:04

would be eligible for parole

11:07

for those

11:08

30 years. But he chose not to

11:08

he wanted to take this to trial

11:11

and again with this type

11:13

of evidence. I don't know I

11:14

struggle to I agree with me but

11:18

the other thing is because of

11:18

this video. It really lets the

11:22

jury viewers who

11:22

are watching I believe that

11:23

this guy's really capable of

11:23

anything so when you hear this

11:26

little boy tell

11:26

this doctor that he had all

11:29

these bruises which seemed to

11:31

match up up with where some of

11:31

these injuries were a bruise on

11:32

his side had a lacerated liver

11:35

playing football.

11:36

It was a bruise or some kind of

11:38

area discoloration in his chest

11:39

he had a lacerated heart I can

11:43

just envision. How this guy

11:43

would have wanted to teach his

11:46

son how to play football on

11:49

turf and causing all those

11:50

bruises. It is a very very

11:52

short leap to think of the type

11:54

of things that he was doing to

11:54

that poor little boy under the

11:55

guise of trying to teach him

11:56

how to play football that

11:56

resulted in these deadly

11:59

injuries.

12:02

>> Do I agree, Michael mean it

12:02

poor coy suffer from so many

12:03

injuries and the defense is

12:06

really not going to have and

12:09

the other possible are

12:10

reasonable X the nation,

12:10

especially in the video is so

12:12

graphic and so violent. The

12:15

young boy

12:17

6 years old and the way he was

12:19

treated and frankly, I mean I

12:20

don't think anyone's going to

12:21

understand what anyone would do

12:23

that this child

12:25

is overweight and needs to run

12:26

of the treadmill, it just

12:26

doesn't make any sense. This is

12:29

a sick and

12:30

twisted father, and I think

12:31

we're going to be a pretty

12:34

quick conviction for Michael.

12:34

>> Yeah would have to agree I

12:36

think what he was functioning

12:37

from was a place of anger and I

12:38

think he was taking out

12:41

whatever angry at the

12:42

world that at the mom and

12:43

whoever else was involved was

12:44

taking it out on this poor

12:45

little 6 year-old boys just

12:46

it's just a real climate change

12:47

all right stand by we'll get

12:50

back to court now with the

12:51

judge and the attorneys were

12:52

actually discussing initial

12:52

outside the presence of the

12:53

jury and this involves again as

12:55

I the

12:57

double hearsay of words that

12:58

were set to Corey by his father

12:59

that he tells the doctor can

13:00

cheat all tell the jury those

13:01

things let's get back in

13:04

school.

13:07

>> Work hard to.

13:14

>> That existing state of mind.

13:21

Under 8 o 3 C 3.

13:52

>> suspect is what that means.

13:55

Well those reasons it should

13:59

not.

14:11

Reference

14:12

to consistent. PRI of Henri

14:12

court to get additional

14:15

information.

14:27

>> Our first interview with the

14:31

West.

14:31

You see. I'm sure you know 3 C

14:35

3.

14:40

Font actually could be in this

14:44

good thing. The clerics then

14:45

existing state of mind motion

14:50

Such as intent and motive

14:52

design mental feeling pain in

14:53

your body. This typically means

14:57

that.

14:57

Someone who was present the

15:00

same pain. Lakers are hurts.

15:07

Whether need to position or

15:07

someone else those students are

15:10

generally considered inherently

15:11

unreliable people don't

15:11

complain about something like

15:14

that. At

15:16

the moment. The exception to

15:17

the hearsay rule is based upon

15:20

engaged a lot to do.

15:28

I previously found the child

15:28

seems about because as well as

15:31

what.

15:32

Porches by Nathan Paine work

15:35

program. This is working.

15:38

Question

15:39

anybody's child, the physician

15:41

promise not to tell. Anyone

15:45

what I said. That's not a.

15:48

Saint Matthews.

15:50

The motion sensation physical

15:54

condition. Mind.

16:00

Just a month,

16:01

but it's really more concerned

16:04

about sharing someone.

16:07

I don't want to keep rolling is

16:08

challenging you all are happy

16:09

to play football anymore.

16:12

I know she wants to the that I

16:13

do my father, you know I told

16:16

him I felt Riddle.

16:21

You shouldn't beyond the scope

16:24

of seeking medical treatment.

16:25

Beyond the scope of existing.

16:28

Point.

16:34

So I find that this additional

16:37

should not be admitted to the

16:38

jewelry again a tree but you

16:42

have to.

16:44

This rocking for the second

16:44

issue about the doctor's

16:48

testimony at Route one year.

16:55

That she sure proves and we see

16:57

record high for ball injuries

16:58

and then. He said you was life

17:07

At least inconsistent with that

17:10

jury GQ who usually.

17:12

Fusion is that when what

17:13

happened that she was proud of

17:16

him and she said to him you

17:19

complained that.

17:21

She had to know what happened

17:22

or if you're healthy she could

17:25

be safe.

17:33

Who then said that reuses which

17:34

doctor Sean chest storms headed

17:37

from 4.

17:38

Doctor express here that she

17:41

had

17:42

some disbelief a little unsure

17:43

she said of course you just

17:44

believe the richest hole, let's

17:46

just leave them and then

17:47

pressed further. He said he

17:50

felt

17:51

any further. So I just wonder

17:52

what why and she hopes that the

17:53

want to hear the whole purpose

17:56

of doing. Now

17:59

I'm concerned that he

18:01

was result a PRI was results

18:02

saying we can be safe. We

18:05

suggest you Sunday.

18:06

>> All right we're going take a

18:07

break we'll have more of the

18:07

judge's ruling when we come

18:08

back, thanks to be more money

18:09

for joining us this evening.

18:11

Please don't

18:12

go away coming up next. We'll

18:13

continue our special coverage

18:14

of the treadmill abuse murder

18:15

trial in New Jersey. So keep it

18:16

here on Court TV, your front

18:18

row seat to just.

18:33

And when Christian for there

18:36

and that.

18:39

He said he got more bruises

18:43

when he fell from a trend.

18:50

>> Was he was explaining this.

18:57

His mother tear it up and start

18:59

to to cry. And then he got

19:03

tearful as well.

19:11

>> Welcome back to our special

19:12

coverage of the triple abuse

19:16

murder trial in New

19:17

Michael Iowa. Defendant

19:18

Christopher Gregory is accused

19:18

of first-degree murder in the

19:21

death of a 6 year-old son

19:23

Cory Mitchell. Now yesterday

19:23

the jury saw multiple videos of

19:24

the defendant and his son in

19:27

the building's gym.

19:29

6 year-old Corey is on the

19:29

treadmill and Gregor can be

19:32

seen increasing the speed on

19:33

the treadmill. Really until the

19:35

child repeatedly falls while

19:35

running and trying to get back

19:38

on the machine while

19:39

it's running. The prosecutors

19:40

are saying the treadmill

19:42

actually caused Corey's death.

19:43

They do say the child was the

19:45

victim of chronic abuse so

19:46

today, one of Korea's teachers

19:47

testified that she saw several

19:49

bruises on him. Attorneys on

19:52

both sides have been discussing

19:56

the issue with

19:56

the judge and this involves the

19:57

doctor who looked at him

19:58

examined him right before he

20:01

was set to the hospital and the

20:02

problem is she said something

20:05

to the effect that I had to

20:06

Preston will prod him for

20:06

information. The defense is

20:07

arguing that that's prejudicial

20:08

prejudicial they want to

20:09

correct

20:11

of instruction against the

20:12

state is obviously arguing

20:13

against that so let's get back

20:13

into court as the judge

20:14

continues to discuss the issues

20:16

with the terms.

20:19

>> Testimony change.

20:21

We became more detail in just a

20:23

matter of minutes so now what

20:26

about that. Do I just told you

20:27

disregard the whole thing.

20:31

Words are some over rent.

20:32

What you want about Mister

20:32

glued to that question senator.

20:38

Is it true he just testified

20:38

hearing outside the presence of

20:41

drinking say.

20:43

Because we did this last week

20:43

France's she would want to

20:46

transfer from that we don't.

20:48

And you know why why did she do

20:48

that when it's not going to do

20:51

that to us in the first.

20:55

>> Judge I cannot

20:55

answer why she didn't do it in

20:58

the first place I don't

20:59

know it it's how my questions

21:01

came across her, I don't know

21:02

if it's in the context of

21:03

asking about demeanor. I

21:05

honestly thought.

21:09

>> We're more than a

21:11

certain well when you're in

21:12

need and want to mention the

21:13

criticism, but I met you could

21:15

just got to you know get your

21:16

call patients later you see

21:18

Corey first one set but instead

21:20

you develop the room.

21:23

>> I I

21:25

that her injuries were

21:25

different before a jury and

21:26

they were outside the presence

21:27

I was trying.

21:27

>> And to stay that way

21:28

anything that needed to be on

21:32

the record it could be on

21:33

the record.

21:33

>> And as far as what I would

21:34

say I appreciate you for that

21:34

as comments are not critical of

21:38

the prosecution. As far as what

21:41

what she said

21:41

to court.

21:42

>> And I was trying to bring

21:43

that out in a chronological way

21:44

what she said to Corey what it

21:45

you know. The part of the world

21:49

for hearing his statements and

21:49

I think when she told me things

21:52

it was a little.

21:54

Jumbled I don't know if she

21:55

appreciated the significance of

21:55

that possibly instead of it

21:58

being occurring

21:58

at separate portions like I was

22:02

trying to do with the one

22:03

'04 hearing I also asked about

22:03

his demeanor think I followed

22:06

up with that question which may

22:06

have closer to say that we

22:09

should I can't.

22:12

But that is why I did try to

22:13

conduct the for hearing the way

22:13

that I did so all of it could

22:16

be fleshed out.

22:22

>> Remarkably difference

22:23

between what we're hearing in

22:23

her case went before the jury.

22:26

I

22:27

don't know I don't think

22:27

anything good as prosecutors

22:30

try Khalid or.

22:33

Something coming out of one for

22:35

your testimony was different.

22:38

Whats the defense adjustment.

23:10

For anyone in this country.

23:16

for 7.

23:25

And in true rulings are.

23:30

>> Designed for the trial judge

23:31

to exercise discretion based

23:32

upon the facts and

23:34

circumstances of Kings.

23:36

General proposition I find

23:45

the doctor described is a

23:45

pretty calm about to come to a

23:46

doctor doctor, the city history

23:49

from you.

23:50

common and history's elicited

23:53

from

23:54

a parent. It's Positions in

23:57

guest.

24:10

>> All those things are

24:11

proving something that that's

24:12

common knowledge that children

24:12

are sometimes reluctant to say

24:15

things. Any interest

24:18

in history. The jury's smart

24:18

enough to make its own

24:19

credibility determinations.

24:22

You see the trend of U.S..

24:28

Crews will ration

24:29

front it. So that's not

24:30

particularly shocking to the

24:31

jury that the doctor observed

24:35

these things.

24:36

So I find the inappropriate for

24:38

me to strike the doctor's

24:41

testimony.

24:47

Declined to do in terms of

24:48

whether or not Mister Hu Jia

24:49

cross-examined the witness on

24:52

the fact that she got.

24:55

It wasn't for the

25:01

it's a problem actual

25:01

transcript from because it just

25:04

You could

25:05

S a dry in what I was thinking

25:08

was.

25:08

Similar to the limiting

25:11

instruction on

25:12

statements up shouldn't I would

25:13

use a limiting instruction to

25:14

the jury a conclusion to start

25:16

your testimony. Here's their

25:18

considerations case. Well

25:20

speaking to allegedly made by

25:24

to the position.

25:28

You see students are not really

25:31

evidence statements made in

25:34

good faith and I actually track

25:38

of persons. The existing.

25:43

She did say she refused to

25:44

condition, thanks to pain as

25:47

well as state aid.

25:52

A good face the purpose of

25:56

medical diagnosis right of

25:57

the net history past present

25:58

symptoms, worsen sedition your

26:00

chairmanship action. They're

26:03

just they're exceptional

26:04

general cause or as well and

26:05

then to get that change in

26:08

structure.

26:10

In considering whether to who

26:13

we actually meet these oral

26:13

statements. You should consider

26:16

and when

26:19

this happens You

26:22

you consideration all the facts

26:22

and circumstances, including

26:23

whether the doctor prodded him

26:26

to make any statements.

26:28

If your consideration we states

26:29

were not not credible and you

26:31

must record them. If you find

26:34

she was made or questions

26:35

credible and do what we think

26:36

that pushes me to find

26:38

countries.

26:42

I think that you

26:46

period yes, a question about

26:46

the cross-examination on what

26:49

do you do what you just know.

26:54

all right we should give the

26:55

court for some time to do look

26:58

rather than just.

27:04

And of course

27:18

>> all right so that's the end

27:20

of the arguments they're

27:21

obviously that was taking place

27:23

outside the presence of the

27:23

jury will be bringing the jury

27:24

back in so the doctor can

27:25

continue her testimony the

27:27

judge really have

27:28

3 choices here. The doctor

27:28

testified on a proper of

27:29

evidence this was outside the

27:31

presence of the jury. She

27:32

didn't mention that you had to

27:33

pick in Prague to get that

27:33

information out so the defense

27:35

said look you want

27:38

to strike all of her testimony

27:39

at this point the judge said no

27:40

I'm not going to go that far he

27:42

could allow them to cross are

27:43

on it. Her previous testimony

27:46

that was outside the presence

27:46

of the jury that deferred but

27:47

now we decided you know what

27:50

I'm gonna give

27:50

a curative instructions going

27:52

to tell them when they look at

27:53

this testimony they have to

27:53

take different things into

27:54

account so that was a choice he

27:56

made he also did

27:59

say though she denies that she

28:02

didn't make that statement

28:02

previously then they will be

28:04

allowed to cross examine her

28:05

and although they don't they

28:06

don't have any kind affidavit

28:08

on it or any kind of record

28:10

of it. They will go back and

28:11

they will have the court

28:11

reporter go back and read back

28:14

what you testify

28:15

too so just came up with a nice

28:16

compromise there all right

28:17

looks like they're set to go

28:17

jury back in that's go back in

28:20

for more of the doctors test.

28:23

>> About the examination.

28:23

I pray that you conducted could

28:24

you please the examination

28:27

that.

28:30

>> Yes

28:33

and it had

28:36

normal activity and alertness

28:38

I'm sitting up without favoring

28:39

anything his eyes when I say

28:42

eyes

28:42

were clear.

28:43

>> I looked at the external

28:46

everything

28:47

looks normal as the whites of

28:47

his eyes like Norm, I look

28:49

inside his eyes with a scoping

28:52

and into that

28:53

back of his eyes that was

28:54

normal I examine teen years can

28:57

now and is.

29:00

Kind of

29:01

membranes knows it weren't for

29:03

the canals would clear his

29:03

throat was clear you didn't

29:05

have any redness of us so he

29:08

had no signs

29:08

of any by rule but I say viral

29:09

statement, I mean you had no

29:12

running no snow.

29:16

You guess. His neck. He can

29:19

move it.

29:20

Directions it was severly

29:22

wasn't favoring it and he had

29:23

no we call 6 cervical and not

29:26

that

29:26

the meat he had no large notes

29:29

anywhere on his neck the other

29:30

thing that I look for when

29:33

there's infection

29:36

if there's tenderness over that

29:37

she going to look at the

29:38

sinuses and I checked and they

29:40

were not.

29:43

Tender and the

29:44

other scientists is that Al

29:45

qaeda and there is no

29:46

tenderness I listened to his

29:48

heart and it was.

29:50

>> Regular rate didn't have

29:50

air.

29:51

>> There's a new normal heart

29:53

sounds.

29:56

his breathing I had already

30:00

observed that he wasn't I'm

30:03

breathing faster Ivey us and

30:05

sucking his what we call

30:06

labor's sucking his ribs and

30:08

look at making any effort he

30:11

was just breathing

30:14

normally quietly and when I

30:14

listen to him with a

30:15

stethoscope his lungs were

30:17

clear.

30:19

And he had what we call good

30:22

air movement. Meaning why he

30:25

could he had a full breath

30:27

and then out knows particularly

30:28

interesting because some of the

30:30

into the I was interested in

30:32

any read injuries. How he did

30:36

all his.

30:40

If I lay down a checked his

30:41

abdomen and it wasn't just

30:44

ended.

30:47

Why when I say HS and he

30:50

had no enlargement that I could

30:53

feel of his liver

30:54

his clean. Or any mask is that

30:57

I could he

31:00

didn't guard because sometimes

31:00

children don't tell you that

31:04

things hurt so I push

31:04

hard and there was no

31:05

tightening of his muscles there

31:08

was no and I listen to

31:11

bow sounds and you know meaning

31:14

I listen that the stethoscope

31:15

and they were normal so

31:17

everything was good with

31:21

his

31:23

as far as neurologic he was a

31:27

lure. I say we're in

31:27

a times 3 January was he knew

31:31

we was in new ways with.

31:32

Check people's their

31:35

reactivity.

31:38

As I

31:39

move meant as well as cranial

31:43

nerves. There is no truth

31:44

being every.

31:44

>> Things and you know the

31:46

money money money out there

31:49

wasn't any

31:51

true bang.

31:52

>> And then I went on to look

31:55

at is his muscular skeletal

31:58

system. You know I

32:00

noted all of that is the

32:01

finding is on his skin and a

32:04

hand.

32:06

Talk about them now I can keep

32:08

the resting salmon and talk to

32:16

I wanted to make sure you

32:16

didn't have any injuries to his

32:19

muscles or

32:20

bones so I had him raise his

32:23

arms up over

32:23

his head you can do that he

32:26

could move from every way won

32:29

it.

32:30

He I had him get off the table

32:34

and walk

32:40

for me and a jump up and

32:43

I without any difficulty

32:44

without fear, anything in

32:46

normal gate, you and I checked.

32:46

>> Will his muscles which for

32:48

me is all he has well now that

32:48

could push him down he's got

32:51

pushed me away.

32:53

>> All right so then at about

32:57

05:18PM in the

32:58

afternoon on people first Corey

32:59

the 6 year-old boy the victim

33:01

in this case presented

33:02

relatively normal. Other than a

33:03

few brews bruises less than 24

33:04

hours later, he would be dead

33:06

and that's

33:07

the issue in this case all

33:08

right we're going take a break

33:09

here when we come back we'll

33:09

continue with more of that

33:10

doctor's testimony. The record

33:54

Welcome back folks will get you

33:55

back inside the courtroom in

33:56

just a moment, but first I do

33:57

want to bring in my guests for

33:59

this hour,

34:00

joining me deputy public

34:02

defender for La County for them

34:02

today for the great to see you

34:03

thank you so much for joining

34:04

us on the program tonight here

34:05

in our special hour. Here on

34:08

Court TV Let me ask you this.

34:09

I want to get your thoughts on

34:12

this case

34:13

but really what I want to ask

34:14

you is this doctor's testimony

34:16

do you think it presents any

34:18

problem for the prosecution and

34:19

here's why say that because

34:19

she's talking about a kid is

34:22

presenting very very normal.

34:23

We'll find out later that there

34:26

was some very serious injuries

34:27

fat that the defense is called

34:30

claimed was cause other ways

34:31

after his appearance in front

34:32

of this doctor of do you think

34:36

the present any problems that

34:36

he's not showing any pain

34:37

present for the to the normal

34:40

other than some bruises.

34:41

>> Absolutely you know usually

34:42

most child abuse is especially

34:48

>> who received kids later on

34:49

in their care as opposed to

34:52

right from birth with.

34:54

>> Show symptoms of abuse

34:55

pretty early on this kid is

34:55

presenting rather healthy, it

34:57

goes to show there seems to be

35:00

a healthy relationship in

35:00

the home. What it really sounds

35:02

like if I read New Jersey law

35:04

correctly is they have to show

35:06

that he allowed it injury to

35:08

occur her deck was braces

35:09

substantial risk death that was

35:12

not an accident.

35:12

So because the key presented so

35:16

healthy to

35:16

the PD it suggests that what

35:17

happened to this kid really was

35:20

the result of

35:21

an accident and I mean Michael

35:21

you know kids to more these

35:22

days and just you know play on

35:24

monkey bars and you

35:28

dog

35:29

paddle and layoffs. Scotch you

35:31

know they're they play a much

35:31

more robust game so I I don't

35:32

think this is highly unusual

35:35

frankly.

35:36

>> All right Philip stand by

35:39

and get folks back into court

35:39

now for more testimony from

35:40

doctor Nancy deacon again she

35:43

saw him on

35:43

April 1st and the point was at

35:46

05:18AM it was an

35:47

emergency appointment by the

35:48

mom because she was afraid of

35:48

some of the bruises she was

35:49

seeing on let's go back into

35:52

the court.

35:53

>> He says since the ball as

35:57

mask and so

35:58

absolutely nothing.

35:59

>> To that I was worried about

35:59

with his muscles or he's going

36:02

to be a no swelling.

36:04

>> I have stand on each foot

36:07

and

36:11

their way because sometimes

36:12

you've given us so I made sure

36:14

you had no. No problems with he

36:17

had no.

36:23

More than anything that would

36:24

suggest an infection of of his

36:27

scanner and

36:30

you know

36:31

swelling and I have way seen

36:34

help Haitian of

36:36

his chest. I push on all the

36:37

rents in phone wants to make

36:39

sure that there wasn't any sign

36:42

of of red.

36:47

Tenderness anywhere doctor

36:47

remaking a pushing motion with

36:48

your hands when you just yeah,

36:51

making.

36:54

I pushed and pushed every on.

37:06

No and then I did check and

37:09

Italian.

37:12

And there was nothing and

37:13

no problem. Nasa's are

37:15

abnormalities there as well.

37:17

And then an air mass it is that

37:21

ice over on his skin.

37:30

I have a I used to

37:33

buddy chart because to 2

37:34

be able to show and be able to

37:37

remember where I saw any

37:39

lesions on his skin.

37:42

>> That pushed the witness.

37:50

Doctor to show you what's been

37:53

market us 43.

38:01

I do what what is that and this

38:04

is

38:05

my body.

38:05

>> Chart that showed thick and

38:07

I have written down the the

38:10

lesions that I noticed on

38:11

his body. It says it's a it was

38:13

done I labeled it as we're one

38:16

21, wear a mask you.

38:23

>> And does S 43.

38:29

Visit your office on April 1st.

38:38

>> Would you take me through.

38:48

>> Yes, I'm going to start

38:51

ahead and work my

38:53

way down right side of his 5

38:56

President on and what

38:59

is left or had was what I

39:02

described as pretty pink

39:04

regulation to share with the

39:04

tiny scab. What that means is

39:06

that there was dry.

39:09

>> tissue.

39:12

>> With a little scaf doctor

39:12

could you point to point to a

39:15

body part.

39:16

Yeah bring to my left we're

39:19

headed.

39:25

there was a loop or a ruse over

39:28

his left cheek

39:31

and pointing to the the phone

39:31

right here on his left side of

39:34

his face.

39:41

Number 3 was a a large yellow

39:44

green Brewers that

39:47

was located

39:49

overlying his his shoulder is

39:50

trapeze isn't pointing to my

39:53

left shoulder, right here.

40:03

Was another you large yellow

40:07

green ruse.

40:10

When we when we have

40:13

host the arms are like this so

40:16

it was

40:19

on though the left in her.

40:24

I'm standing with my Kyle's the

40:28

same.

40:31

>> 5th.

40:38

>> The thing that I noticed

40:38

what or that I wrote down was a

40:39

blue proves president over the.

40:44

And although I went into the

40:45

inner aspect of you know align

40:48

the bone.

40:54

Re side of

40:57

his chest.

40:59

And it was 2 areas of what I

41:02

call hyper pigment and then

41:05

which was this game was

41:06

white compared to this day.

41:09

Around.

41:10

So for me that means that was a

41:13

a.

41:18

Healing area of you know I

41:19

scanned with its heel. But the

41:22

payment hasn't come back yet.

41:26

7 was that was my impression a

41:29

7th

41:30

many years who are wisely

41:33

linear I mean like

41:33

a line and it was present on

41:36

the right lower abdomen.

41:37

I think and I called in to

41:40

score.

41:51

These were superficial fresh

41:53

batch is there a little kid

41:56

below the

41:59

belly button above the to

42:01

and the center of this pie ice,

42:04

superficially me.

42:07

The they looked like called a

42:10

fresh because that you could

42:11

see that there was a high for

42:12

him to stab there was like a

42:12

little bit of Moises to them

42:13

that look like that. Scratch

42:16

that just happened.

42:22

Bruce is a nice meet 3 circles.

42:29

they

42:29

were located on the left lower

42:35

lay the the front part of over

42:38

lie, mission so

42:41

the area.

42:41

>> We're the only You can feel

42:43

the bone on the lower leg.

42:46

>> And then a living.

42:53

And

42:55

1010 11.

42:56

>> What I describe just tiny

42:57

scratches.

43:00

>> On the

43:00

>> front of his ankles between

43:03

that foot. The lower part of

43:06

his life.

43:10

>> All right it's an active 6

43:11

year-old boy there could be

43:12

some bruises that's a lot of

43:13

bruises for one boy and if

43:14

you've got a lot of them

43:15

playing football with his dad,

43:16

something's wrong. There should

43:19

have that those

43:20

kind of he was

43:21

t

43:35

>> Welcome back to our special

43:36

coverage of the treadmill abuse

43:37

murder trial going on in New

43:39

Michael Aiello that

43:40

pre attrition who examined the

43:43

victim 6 year-old

43:45

Corey Mitchell is on the stand

43:46

that she examined him before he

43:46

died just testifying now to

43:47

some of the bruises that she

43:49

noticed

43:50

on him. This was one day before

43:53

he died. She's visiting him she

43:54

taken to the hospital after

43:55

what she sees. But again he

43:56

does percent relatively low

43:59

let's go back to school.

44:02

>> The back of

44:05

his body.

44:16

A large yellow green Roos and

44:19

that was located.

44:29

Kind the muscle tissue.

44:38

14.

44:44

Was another large yellow green

44:47

ruse. And it was located at.

45:06

I'm turning around.

45:20

It was worth it you know that

45:22

last one was 14 when 13 today

45:23

described 13. Was another

45:26

proves located on.

45:41

>> Was that everything he did

45:44

that was part of your Yeah.

45:50

Now is the island of the mind

45:53

I.

45:59

I did so you know it Christmas.

46:02

After his collegues and.

46:11

>> my assessment was normal

46:13

Bruce it numerous bruises with

46:17

different

46:17

stages of healing and healed

46:18

abrasions with a history owing

46:20

on a treadmill and getting hit

46:23

with a football.

46:27

Mostly over pony promised

46:27

prominent says that summer over

46:30

soft tissue areas.

46:40

So so so for me you know.

46:46

There were bruises

46:48

that you could explain you know

46:49

by the ones over bony process

46:54

But the play that children do

46:54

there's there's common areas

46:57

where

46:58

we have.

46:59

>> Bruises and then there's

47:03

areas over soft tissue that.

47:06

>> It takes more of a

47:09

blow more usually to have that

47:10

size of a ruse and that kind of

47:11

injury.

47:13

>> That's what

47:14

I was trying so hard to make

47:15

sure the residency underlying

47:18

Boehner

47:21

to dish because there's

47:24

so big and so throat through my

47:25

mind is well when you have

47:28

those kinds of bruises.

47:29

>> It takes either a bigger

47:32

harder.

47:34

>> Or he might have a reason

47:37

why he. And this is easily.

47:45

So I had I want to rule out any

47:46

bleeding or clotting of

47:49

normality.

47:51

As those children can have

47:54

extensive bruising as well.

47:57

>> Did you make recommendations

47:58

for Corey before he left

48:01

office.

48:03

>> Yeah so AI not known that he

48:06

needed to bring him right.

48:06

You need to go right to the

48:09

hospital.

48:10

I had to be we had to be sure.

48:18

he didn't have a you wasn't at

48:19

risk for even worse leading you

48:22

know and the network.

48:28

honestly from

48:31

I learned.

48:36

And what he he my my whole

48:39

impression of this visit.

48:43

He needed further even even if.

48:49

The DC PMP hadn't been

48:53

involved. I would've call.

48:55

But I thought up takes tended

48:58

to the hospital.

48:59

For further evaluation because

49:03

it would he needed more.

49:06

Evaluation and expert.

49:12

Interviewing more that

49:13

was that's not my role as eject

49:15

general pediatrician. More

49:18

care.

49:19

Before I would consider him

49:22

safe to go home.

49:25

>> When you finish with your

49:26

examination Korea making

49:28

recommendations to the cause,

49:31

anybody though Corey

49:32

and recommendations.

49:33

>> I did so I called and this

49:36

is now corners. You know 6.

49:41

caught you know it's getting

49:42

Lee so a cool when I have a

49:45

concern you know you have

49:48

your eye have a careful record.

49:49

But I wanted to also let them

49:49

know what I was worried about.

49:53

And so I called the emergency

49:57

department physician. I.

50:00

I had wanted him to

50:02

go to Jersey But the time

50:02

constraints and the mother you

50:05

know.

50:10

She did agree to take them

50:11

right across the street from my

50:13

office not I'm is a

50:17

wait list

50:17

community hospice. I sent him

50:18

there I called the doctor that

50:20

was going to see him there.

50:23

And

50:24

I called I'm mark a caseworker

50:27

from DC PMP you have

50:28

I asked to be called after my.

50:32

discussed my findings and

50:36

concerns.

50:46

>> All right so there you heard

50:47

the doctor say there was enough

50:50

there

50:51

for her that if the child

50:51

protective Services had not

50:52

already been involved she would

50:55

have called them the mother

50:55

had already gotten them

50:56

involved and she wanted them

50:57

onto taken to the hospital

50:59

further

50:59

checking up. Alright

51:00

cross-examination is next.

51:00

>> Right

51:45

Well testimony continues in the

51:46

truck with abuse murder trial

51:46

in New Jersey pediatrician

51:49

doctor Nancy deacon is now

51:51

on cross-examination which sets

51:52

a couple of points gets pretty

51:52

intense. So let's get back

51:55

inside.

52:27

>> I think I have a

52:30

>> education.

52:33

Which could have.

52:37

Will Scott University.

52:45

That's from University of

52:48

medicine and Dentistry of

52:49

New Jersey. School of

52:50

osteopathic medicine recess was

52:53

called then what.

52:58

>> we have it.

53:01

>> And internship. As part of

53:04

our to get your your.

53:07

Initial Deo so I did that.

53:13

>> Dexter doctors

53:16

of osteopathy.

53:16

>> The get additional training

53:20

and that's off to should we.

53:23

>> education about the

53:26

connection of.

53:28

>> In mind in the muscles and

53:28

how everything is connected and

53:31

influence each other U K.

53:35

It in person.

53:41

Pediatric residency right, yes

53:44

and those that I

53:45

was at Monmouth Medical Center

53:46

now the interpreter Children's

53:49

Hospital in my mind the

53:49

medical Center.

53:52

>> And they we

53:53

tore right.

53:54

>> And it's part of that I'm

53:57

teaching attending there

53:59

it in. Also tell you I'm a

53:59

teaching. I was a teaching

54:00

attending a one-time et on

54:00

jersey shore as well.

54:03

>> So how.

54:04

Well I continue to teach

54:07

residents.

54:08

What kind of residents with

54:09

pediatric residents and how to

54:12

teach for.

54:12

I'm continuing like this my

54:15

entire.

54:18

Careers pediatrician so how

54:21

many

54:21

users that. 90 I finished my

54:24

residency 94 I and I'm CE

54:27

still.

54:30

Clinical

54:37

assistant professor.

54:37

>> at Rutgers Robert Wood, not

54:38

in the Robert Wood Johnson

54:41

Medical Center.

54:44

Take ya Le

54:44

was residents at Monmouth

54:47

Medical Center.

54:51

>> It teaches them had a V P it

54:53

and give how did you think.

54:57

>> You just told the jury.

55:15

And I'm sure when you teach

55:16

your students you tell them how

55:19

important it is.

55:32

When you talk about what Corey

55:35

told. That you need to.

55:38

Coaching to say that.

55:40

That he was reluctant to say

55:43

that to you.

55:47

We need to prop Tim that you

55:47

need to show him he was safe

55:50

can you show we

55:52

begin with in that shot when

55:55

you wrote that you will

55:56

though stage that by the way I

55:57

would believe are important.

56:00

Evaluation.

56:08

>> So I did not document

56:11

exactly what I said.

56:16

>> 10 minutes before charging

56:19

walked into this well did you

56:20

testify at a hearing in this

56:28

Bush will issue a number of

56:31

questions about.

56:38

Before the jury was in.

56:47

It was well look to change.

56:54

>> I said.

57:03

Was reluctant when I asked

57:04

him he hesitated I believe

57:07

that's what I said he has it

57:08

he did. I didn't say a new

57:12

record that he has it he did.

57:12

I said merely I said just what

57:16

he said.

57:25

>> All right so this is all

57:26

about that issue we saw the

57:29

judge talking about The idea

57:32

that during the profit

57:33

for evidence once she did

57:33

mention that you had to pick

57:36

and prodded him to get that

57:36

information how important

57:37

information that's quickly

57:38

bring in deputy public defender

57:40

for La County for

57:41

that debate for that this this

57:41

was dealt with by the judge

57:44

earlier this idea

57:45

that win in the record as well

57:46

as when she testified earlier

57:46

when there was an offer of

57:47

proof she mentioned she had to

57:49

pick

57:51

up right and ultimately I think

57:52

the defense is right for making

57:54

an issue of this because it

57:57

can really sort of help this

57:58

jury understand that if he's

57:58

given the information freely

58:01

that's one thing if he has to

58:01

be prompted that suggests

58:02

something else not helpful to

58:05

the defense.

58:08

>> Yeah obviously you don't

58:10

suggest ability. During a

58:11

medical examination of any

58:13

patients let alone

58:14

a child because it gives the

58:15

impression to the jury and

58:15

you're just making stuff up as

58:18

you

58:19

go along. I got to tell you I

58:20

think it really was going on

58:23

here is more of a

58:24

discovery violation.

58:24

>> If there were parts of her

58:27

proffer that are not in

58:28

the record it's that she

58:31

intended to offer

58:32

through testimony and I think

58:32

it's grounds for a continuance

58:35

or perhaps

58:36

a mistrial because if Council

58:37

did not have this added

58:38

information how are they

58:40

supposed

58:41

to prepare. You know it's one

58:41

thing when you've what dire a

58:42

doctor in expert outside the

58:45

presence of the jury and you

58:47

learn new things during that

58:50

process. But it's another

58:51

to have time to prepare between

58:52

the time you do what do I have

58:53

the time to bring the jury back

58:55

in it's just not enough time

58:58

to prepare.

58:58

>> Yeah, and there really

59:00

wasn't because the profits a

59:01

place that day just a couple of

59:02

minutes before this particular

59:03

testimony all right stand by

59:03

for a moment take folks back

59:04

into court that back on the

59:07

way.

59:14

>> Some portion of the doctor's

59:17

testimony that occurred.

59:19

The position of the defense

59:23

counsel that the doctor.

59:33

At that testimony that some

59:33

time ago probably and

59:36

transcript.

60:01

This is the question.

60:07

I'm approaching you with plenty

60:10

more for good occasion

60:15

as 42. Did you ever take a look

60:16

at this morning to you for a

60:16

moment and tell me if you

60:19

recognize it answer

60:21

I do question what is best for

60:24

you to answer as 42 Corey

60:25

angelo's chart. Okay have to

60:28

take some time

60:31

to review Corey Hart, you tell

60:31

me how pressure election with

60:32

the card is that what Corey

60:35

said you.

60:40

Is that you want me to tell you

60:40

what its members as well are

60:41

just court that question just

60:44

Corey said.

60:47

Answer course says that he got

60:48

a chest arm and hip bruise is

60:49

Jorge gration but he was

60:50

playing football outside of it.

60:51

He said that his dad was

60:54

teaching him how to.

60:56

He said that you got more

60:59

resistant.

61:08

>> He reported it to get back

61:08

You write your waffle you too.

61:32

And the young at home to the

61:35

news about 20 different.

61:38

To see some bruises from.

61:44

We received from one is called

61:47

the teacher.

61:50

>> Well

61:51

that's that's I think the ice

61:52

that I know it you miss

61:55

teaching how many other.

61:58

I have 2 activities actually.

62:06

>> through the back room at the

62:07

hearing.

62:07

>> I I said that the I've

62:08

described to activities said he

62:10

told me about.

62:18

>> It was a father of 3 who was

62:19

playing football outside I'm

62:21

>> He said that

62:22

status page football and to the

62:23

president for the season and

62:26

what was what.

62:34

>> My impression when he was

62:35

talking about was playing

62:35

football with his dad and

62:36

described that way but that was

62:38

my impression. I know of no

62:38

other times playing for poc so.

62:48

And you know 8 that was.

62:49

I don't know when he fell from

62:52

the truck.

62:58

>> If I told you that both the

62:59

treadmill launched 20 of her

63:01

body weight on April 1st we'll

63:02

be with you at that time is

63:05

like yes.

63:10

When he played football is that

63:26

August 28.

63:35

You see any activity he do much

63:36

football and talk with us

63:40

I don't know he was in the

63:43

custody of

63:44

his mother yeah during any of

63:44

that time too I don't know

63:47

where he got this. So when you

63:49

make you a little charging it.

63:52

And you want to find a lot.

63:56

Regulation tissue with time to

63:59

spare. Can you

63:59

tell this jury to contribute

64:03

that to a treadmill.

64:06

A full when he was with his

64:06

mother learning how to catch a

64:07

football with his father of 4

64:10

football

64:10

Troy, a.

64:13

>> Fleck football I can just

64:15

estimate when he died of the

64:15

healing process when it might

64:18

have happened. That's what I

64:21

meant by varying stages.

64:25

>> What you missed it means

64:28

that it's.

64:31

>> It's been probably over a

64:31

week to get you know to 10

64:32

days. Yeah, it's healing.

64:35

It's a.

64:43

>> Right right and you can tell

64:45

anybody year when they heard

64:45

what happened.

64:48

>> I know I can just think

64:50

that there's yellow green which

64:51

is later unit and a side of

64:52

fruit, you know take those

64:52

stages of healing and that

64:55

would it's hard to know

64:59

exactly.

65:03

And Lou Grey are more recent

65:04

against several days, you can't

65:05

really I just described what

65:07

they saw. You have to actually.

65:26

I I'm down here. It says Hypo

65:26

pigment in skin again that's a

65:29

that's an area.

65:32

And I'm just I can't say what

65:33

did he have Michael could be as

65:35

I can just

65:37

telling you.

65:38

>> At that that's going to wrap