Sweet Baby Backlash Goes NUCLEAR + Suicide Squad & Spider-Man 2 DESTROYED by Woke Company

what's up everyone it's IND demion and

there's a massive culture War battle

currently raging across various

platforms and it's becoming clear as day

that the consumers that actually keep

the game industry up float are fighting

back and the people who want to ruin our

favorite hobby are not pleased at all

and they're demanding that these

individuals be silenced there's quite a

bit to go over so let's get to it this

all started because a user on Steam

decided to release a curator which if

you don't know what those are they're

essentially filter tools that you can

use to find things more effectively on

Steam like you could have a curator that

automatically Combs through steam's

thousands of games and looks for Souls

likes or jrpgs you get the idea it's a

handy tool and it makes life for many

much easier it can also be used to

compile list of games that have other

things in common besides genre and this

curator tool in question compiles all

the games that sweet baby Inc has worked

on into one handy comprehensive list

this has of course pissed off a few

people who work it sweet baby but let's

dial back a second here since not

everyone knows who or what sweet baby

even is to quickly give you the lore

surrounding them sweet baby is a

consulting firm that works primarily on

video games and their sole mission is to

bring inclusivity and diversity into the

games that they work on by handling

things from character interactions

dialogue how concepts are presented and

so on basically when a company doesn't

know how to properly convey a culture or

the Small Things included with a

character so they don't end up making

something racist by accident they call

these consulting firms to ensure they

don't do things in a toned deaf way

obviously from hearing that you might

well think that doesn't sound too bad

right well that's of course the opposite

of what's Happening Here seeing as how

pretty much every game that sweet baby

has touched has been to varying degrees

made worse with their involvement the

latest case would of course be Suicide

Squad kill the Justice League which if

you compare that game to the previous

ones is attached to that being of course

the Batman Arkham games the tonal

differences not to mention how

characters are treated couldn't be any

more different and whenever sweet baby

gets involved it becomes evidently clear

that these products suddenly without

question give favorable care to any

character that isn't a straight white

male Batman and Arkham compared to Squad

is of course one really good example

however the other one that disappointed

me greatly was how Peter Parker was

treated from Spider-Man 2018 compared to

the most recent game in the 2018 game

which had no sweet baby involvement to

my knowledge anyway Peter Parker was an

extremely capable heroic young man and I

would argue that version of Peter and

Spider-Man to be an incredible depiction

of what a modern-day Spiderman should be

so much so that I honestly wish the MCU

Spider-Man was more like that Spidey in

the 2018 Insomniac game then when you

play Spider-Man 2 suddenly Peter seems

weaker and not as capable as a hero

seemingly out of nowhere and Miles

Morales who is clearly a person of color

starts to quickly overshadow Peter and

by the end of Spider-Man 2 miles is

confirmed by Insomniac to be the main

Spider-Man going forward which if you've

played the Insomniac Games miles being

the main character doesn't make really

any sense at all especially considering

that the main villains of the next

inevitable Spider-Man game will

obviously be Green Goblin and Dr Octopus

and F who played these games would know

that Miles has no personal connection to

either of these villains yet of course

Peter obviously does but that doesn't

matter because Peter Parker represents

everything sweet baby and their

Consultants actively work to undermine

or ruin in their entirety so this

company has essentially made video games

across the board more inclusive but

retroactively has also made every single

title they've touched worse because of

their involvement and this steam curator

tool compiles a list of every game that

has had sweet baby involved here I'll

show you some of the games as you can

see they've worked on quite a few AAA

titles already including the son

Spider-Man games Ratchet and Clank which

of course introduced rivet who outshines

ratchet quite often in that game because

she's a girl so that's a part of their

objective too and interestingly enough

you'll also notice quite a few games

that have either not resonated with fans

such as Starfield or games that have

outright bombed and closed Studios like

for spoken in Saints Row even other DC

games that got terrible receptions like

Gotham Knights have also been worked on

by sweet baby as well which is a game

that felt like a pale imitation of the

Batman Arkham series and went out of its

way to make sure that you knew that

Nightwing and Robin are not straight

because ESG reasons as you can see this

tool is also gaining a lot of steam no

pun intended in terms of followers last

night it was around 9,000 follows now as

the making of this video it's around

24,000 and as you can see in real time

here as I refresh the page over and over

again the number of follows is steadily

increasing at a healthy rate so this

curator tool is becoming quickly popular

and it's clear fans are happy that it

exists of course the people at Sweet

Baby think its existence is harmful and

actively want it removed and are

resorting to trying to strong arm steam

into Banning the user in question and if

that were to happen Not only would this

user lose their curator tool but access

to their entire library of games on

Steam as well so what are these sweet

baby boys and girls saying exactly well

before I do that just a reminder don't

harass these people let's just analyze

and look over what they're doing and to

be frank with you guys these sweet baby

employees are doing more damage

themselves by bringing attention to this

to begin with but anyway one of these

Consultants is someone named Chris

Kindred who here as you can see tells

their thousands of followers to report

this tool and they also made it apparent

here that they're hoping it works so

that this user user loses their game

Library access Kindred is basically

jangling keys in front of their

followers to mass harass and report

someone that they don't agree with which

is technically against the terms of

service on Twitter and that's why I tell

you to not harass these people because

we cannot stoop to their level there's

also another sweet Bing Bong baby here

whose username is Lego butts that name

might not be familiar to many of you but

let me catch you up on some lore shall I

so thanks to grum over on Twitter he's

the guy who led the original team that

made World of Warcraft produced Diablo

II in Starcraft and more well he's on

our side fellas he thinks sweet baby's a

cancer as well so he's been calling out

all of these people who have all to

varying degrees locked their replies or

accounts entirely but don't worry I got

all the receipts already fellas we're

good over here anyway back to Lego butts

they work for sweet baby as well and

they're of course echoing what that

Kindred person said and wants the

curator to gone and the user banned on

Steam for simply making a curator tool

that does what it's said to do however

it turns out Lego butts is a veteran of

the gamergate era as thanks to Grumps so

back in February 2014 people like Lego

bots who's embed with people like Zoe

Quinn who if you know anything about

gamergate Zoe Quinn is an Infamous

figure during this time she's a raging

feminist who actually through

accusations that weren't true ended up

getting a game developer to how do I see

this on YouTube well they un alive

themselves because of her and she has

been known to use her influence to get

positive reviews on stuff she's worked

on too so back in 2014 Zoe Quinn along

with this Lego buts user launched a Dos

attack against a site they didn't agree

with called the find young capitalists

which was a targeted attack that brought

the site down to its knees because

people like Quinn and Lego didn't agree

with them and Zoe Quinn was even quoted

saying when this happened at Lego butts

oops we dos something on accident then

Quinn said I like how a conversation

between me and Lego butts resulted in

accidentally killing an exploitative

startups website so who are these young

capitalists exactly apparently they were

a charity that was working to get women

to work in video games and through

sponsors and charity they would create

games with the goal of promoting women

for whatever reason Zoe Quinn Lego butts

didn't want this to go through and

though those tweets are still available

on Twitter as of the making of this

video anyway they decided to dock a

charity which resulted in that charity

losing $10,000 in sponsors due to those

companies pulling out due to the docks

and Lego buts went out of their way to

dox people who worked with this charity

because they wanted to I'll link a

Reddit thread in the description if you

want to go over yourself since it's a

lot and obviously since I don't want

this video to be like an hour long I

won't delve too deep into it but the

point here is that people like Lego

butts are intrinsically tied to the

gamergate era and they now work as a

consultant with sweet baby ink so this

is someone who's been heavily involved

with suppressing free speech and

enforcing ideological ideas for a long

time over 10 years at least at this

point anyway so here's what Lego butts

had to say concerning this curator tool

that exposes them again all from Twitter

so let's read together which listen I'm

not sure who uses curator list my guess

is it's people who would never ever buy

the games any of us work on except they

do and don't list those particular games

here but there's just nothing preventing

this even though it's clearly not

curators are for it's doubled in

followers overnight and we get to see

exactly what people are describing it as

a way to avoid inclusivity they're just

saying it and there's no one challenging

them that isn't a complaint it's just a

fact and I can't stay quiet about it nor

should I have to for example at steam

doesn't have guidelines for curators as

far as I can tell that would prevent

someone from starting a curation group

that focuses on say sweet baby Inc and

warns people to not buy games they're

associated with which could just list

any game at all anyway remember that

these people do exist and while ignoring

it goes a very long way boosting those

you know are affected and targeted is

the other side of it that needs to also

happen not even sweet baby just everyone

existing that they are angry at for

existing it's pretty funny to see a note

on my steam curator post I guess they

need to defend themselves because

they're completely wrong about

everything sweet baby or any narrative

team does and have no interest in

finding out Lego butts is clearly

attempting to save face and try to paint

sweet baby as this righteous cause but

we know that's anything but the case in

reality the truth is that everything

sweet baby has touched has been ruined

or downright destroyed and it's obvious

that when they are involved with

something things can even get so bad

that they actually end up closing shop

like with fores spoken or Saints Row

which are two games whose Studios Clos

down to how poorly they sold and

reviewed of course users on Twitter then

began replying to these consultants and

they had some good things to say like

this person for example I'm confused why

would this be a problem no matter what

your thoughts are I don't see why it

shouldn't be allowed for a curator to

identify games with some specific

companies involved I'm sure other cators

do similar things for different reasons

cringe I thought you were proud of your

work why hide it this one especially

resonated with me cuz it's true if a

consulting firm like this is so proud of

their work on the video games that they

create why wouldn't they want their work

to be more publicly known the only

reason why you wouldn't want your work

to be known is because you know deep

down in your heart part that what you're

doing is disingenuous and actively Works

to ruin the products you're involved

with there simply can't be any other

reason and that's what many users are

clearly pushing back against everyone is

tired and annoyed of their favorite

games getting destroyed like this time

and again all I wanted was great

Spider-Man games that didn't sideline

Peter Parker or make him seem pathetic

yet as soon as we baby got involved with

Spider-Man it was obvious that anyone

who is white straight or male must be

ruined to make way for the new age of

progress in their minds I guess and

we're clearly all tired of it and it's

clear that when consumers voice their

opinions they just get attacked and

belittled constantly so the only real

course of action that will actually

change things is for consumers to vote

with their wallets which is clearly what

they've been doing and remember that

stuff like Saints Row or for spoken

failed and imploded long before anyone

even knew what sweet baby even was at

the time those games were not boy Ed

because of these Consultants being

involved as like I said their name in

existence was largely unknown at the

time but it was clear that the messages

and handling of these games were

considered so poor that users rejected

them anyway so to say that players

rejected games like those in order to

stick a middle finger to this consulting

firm when again no one really knew they

existed during those game's releases is

just not true at all but now of course

we've been made more aware and that

worries them and they lik are angry cuz

now their name is being attached to

something that will instantly Mark those

games for failure and if the hard work

of the games made are rejected and fail

because of sweet baby's involvement then

obviously going forward less Studios or

Publishers would want to actively work

with sweet babies so their games aren't

marked and rejected in a mass exodus by

Future fans but really that isn't the

fault of the fans or this curator tool

either because sweet baby could have

been a positive change in the games that

they work on but it's clear that their

ideology and group Collective mindset is

anything but what fans want in their

games so really if these people are mad

about this they can't blame anyone but

themselves because I didn't tell these

Consultants to do what they did nor did

any of you watching why is it our fault

that these Consultants have ruined so

many great franchises already then of

course the question becomes well what do

they have to do in the future then of

course this consulting firm will want to

keep getting paid and exist but if they

their name being tied to a project will

instantly flag it for Mass rejection

what do they do now the likely scenario

is they work on future projects in an

uncredited fashion or they get listed in

the credits of future projects with

different names like instead of the

credits of a game just saying sweet baby

in it it'll just say consultants and a

name or something like that but I would

argue going forward now that people are

hyper aware to the existence of this

group and every single game being made

now especially those of Western Studios

will have their credits and development

examined with a surgical lens and every

single game being made will be examined

and studied by literally thousands of

people to ensure each game made is not

stained with the mark of the stinky poor

baby and their woke consultants and

maybe even then they'll just forgo their