Trump Left In TEARS After Judge DESTROYED Him With Wrong Decision!

Speech Of Democracy
21 May 202415:02

Summary

TLDRThe video discusses the indefinite postponement of Donald Trump's trial for mishandling classified documents by Judge Eileen Cannon, a Trump appointee. The judge's decision to delay the trial, along with her use of paperless orders, is criticized as potentially shielding her from appeals and scrutiny. The video suggests that these tactics could be preventing a trial before the November 2024 election, potentially benefiting Trump's presidential campaign. It raises questions about the impartiality of a judge appointed by the defendant and the integrity of the judicial process.

Takeaways

  • πŸ“œ The trial concerning Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents has been indefinitely postponed by the judge in Florida.
  • 🚫 The delay is seen as a strategic move by Trump to avoid criminal charges before the November 2024 US presidential election.
  • 🧐 Judge Eileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, is criticized for her handling of the case, including the use of paperless orders to avoid documentation.
  • πŸ“š The case involves nearly three dozen National Security records, including nuclear secrets, found at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.
  • πŸ’Ό Trump's legal team has argued that these records are his personal property, a claim that Judge Cannon has accepted.
  • πŸ€” The postponement raises questions about whether the trial will occur before the presidential election and the potential impact on Trump's campaign.
  • πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ Prosecutor Jack Smith may attempt to have Judge Cannon removed from the case, but this process could be lengthy and uncertain.
  • 🀝 Judge Cannon's actions are viewed by some as favoring Trump, who appointed her, and there are concerns about her impartiality.
  • πŸ‘₯ The script mentions two of Judge Cannon's clerks quitting mid-term, suggesting possible disagreements or ethical concerns.
  • πŸ“‰ The public interest in resolving the case before the election is highlighted, but the delays suggest a lack of urgency from the court.
  • πŸ•°οΈ The potential for the case to be dismissed if Trump is reelected is noted, emphasizing the political implications of the delays.

Q & A

  • What is the current status of Donald Trump's classified documents case?

    -The trial has been indefinitely postponed by Judge Eileen Cannon, who has laid out a plan through the end of July to handle other issues in the case before announcing a new trial date.

  • What strategy is being suggested that Donald Trump's legal team is employing?

    -The script suggests that Donald Trump's legal team is using delay as a primary strategy to keep him free of criminal charges until after the November 2024 US presidential election.

  • What is the role of Judge Eileen Cannon in the case?

    -Judge Eileen Cannon is the federal judge who has postponed the trial and is accused of using paperless orders to shield herself from scrutiny by the appeals court.

  • Why is there a discussion about the possibility of removing Judge Cannon from the case?

    -There is a discussion because of her perceived bias and the use of paperless orders, which makes it difficult for the prosecution to appeal her decisions and may suggest a lack of impartiality.

  • What is the significance of the November 2024 US presidential election in relation to the case?

    -If Donald Trump is reelected, he may have the power to dismiss Jack Smith and both of his cases, which could potentially impact the outcome of the legal proceedings.

  • What are the accusations against Judge Cannon regarding her handling of the case?

    -The accusations include gross incompetence at best and blatant corruption at worst, with the judge being accused of acting in Trump's favor and delaying the trial for his benefit.

  • What is the Presidential Records Act mentioned in the script?

    -The Presidential Records Act is a law that Trump's legal team argues gives him rights to the documents found at Mar-a-Lago, claiming they are his personal property.

  • What are the implications of Judge Cannon's actions for the rule of law in the United States?

    -The implications suggest a potential erosion of trust in the judiciary, as her actions may be seen as prioritizing political interests over impartial justice, which could undermine the rule of law.

  • Why is there concern about the use of paperless orders by Judge Cannon?

    -The concern is that paperless orders make it harder for the prosecution to appeal decisions and for the appeals court to scrutinize her actions, potentially allowing her to avoid accountability for her rulings.

  • What is the potential impact of the delays on the public interest?

    -The delays may be seen as detrimental to the public interest, as they postpone the resolution of a significant legal case involving a former president, which many believe should be resolved prior to an election.

  • What are the ethical considerations for judges regarding impartiality?

    -Judges are expected to follow a Code of Ethics that emphasizes the importance of impartiality. If a judge's impartiality can be reasonably questioned due to their connections or actions, recusal may be appropriate to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ“œ Delay Tactics in Trump's Classified Documents Case

The script discusses the indefinite postponement of Donald Trump's trial concerning the mishandling of classified documents found at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The judge in Florida, Eileen Cannon, has removed the trial date from the calendar and outlined a plan to address other issues in the case by the end of July. Trump's legal team has argued that the documents, including sensitive national security records, are his personal property, a claim that Judge Cannon has accepted. The strategy of delaying the case is seen as a way for Trump to avoid criminal charges before the November 2024 presidential election. The script also suggests that the judge may be shielding herself from scrutiny by issuing paperless orders, making it difficult for the prosecutor, Jack Smith, to appeal decisions or have her removed from the case.

05:03

πŸ€” Questioning Judge Cannon's Impartiality and Delays

This paragraph delves into concerns about Judge Cannon's impartiality and her handling of the case. It raises questions about her decision to delay the trial indefinitely, especially considering the public interest in resolving the charges against Trump before the presidential election. The script points out that Judge Cannon has acted in ways that favor Trump, including granting him relief that his lawyers did not even request. It also mentions the resignation of two of her clerks and suggests that she may be using stall tactics to avoid scrutiny. The New York Times is cited, indicating that the judge has not addressed the backlog of motions that she contributed to. The paragraph concludes by speculating on the potential political motivations behind Judge Cannon's actions and the implications for the rule of law.

10:04

πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ The Impact of Politically Motivated Judicial Appointments

The final paragraph of the script addresses the broader issue of politically motivated judicial appointments and their impact on the justice system. It criticizes the practice of appointing judges to achieve political goals, rather than for their adherence to ethics and good faith. The script highlights the case of Judge Cannon, who was appointed by Trump and has been accused of delaying the proceedings to benefit him. The paragraph also discusses the potential repercussions of such actions, suggesting that if justice is not served, it could lead to a dystopian scenario where the rule of law is compromised. It calls for a system where there is no direct connection between the defendant and the judge to ensure impartiality and the integrity of the legal process.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Donald Trump

Donald Trump is the 45th President of the United States and a central figure in the video's narrative. The script discusses ongoing legal issues involving him, specifically the case concerning the mishandling of classified documents found at his Mar-a-Lago estate. His strategy to delay the trial until after the November 2024 election is highlighted as a key theme.

πŸ’‘Federal classified documents case

This term refers to the legal case against Donald Trump for allegedly mishandling classified documents, including national security records, found at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The video discusses the complexities and the delays in the trial, which are seen as tactics to postpone the resolution of the case until after the 2024 presidential election.

πŸ’‘Judge Eileen Cannon

Judge Eileen Cannon is a federal judge appointed by Donald Trump. The video script highlights her role in the classified documents case, suggesting that she has been instrumental in delaying the trial. Her decisions and the use of 'paperless orders' are scrutinized in the context of potential bias.

πŸ’‘Delay

Delay is a recurring theme in the video, indicating the strategy used by Donald Trump's legal team to postpone the trial. The script suggests that these delays are intentionally used to stretch the case beyond the 2024 election, potentially influencing the outcome.

πŸ’‘Mishandling of classified documents

The term refers to the alleged improper handling of sensitive national security records by Donald Trump. The video discusses the charges against him for this mishandling, which includes the discovery of nuclear secrets at his estate.

πŸ’‘Mar-a-Lago

Mar-a-Lago is Donald Trump's private estate in Florida, where the classified documents were found. The video script uses Mar-a-Lago as the location where the documents were improperly stored, indicating a breach of national security protocols.

πŸ’‘Presidential records act

The Presidential Records Act is mentioned in the script as a legal argument made by Trump's legal team, claiming that the documents found at Mar-a-Lago were his personal property under this act. The video questions the validity of this claim and its acceptance by Judge Cannon.

πŸ’‘Prosecutor Jack Smith

Jack Smith is referenced as the prosecutor in the case against Donald Trump. The video speculates on the possibility of him attempting to have Judge Cannon removed from the case due to her perceived bias and the delays she has imposed.

πŸ’‘Paperless orders

Paperless orders are orders issued by Judge Cannon without documentation, which the video suggests is a tactic to shield herself from scrutiny by the appeals court. This method makes it difficult for appeals to be based on her orders.

πŸ’‘November 2024 US presidential election

The script implies that the timing of the trial's delay is strategically aimed at extending beyond the November 2024 US presidential election. The potential impact of this timing on the legal case and political implications is a significant aspect of the video's discussion.

πŸ’‘Legal justification

The term is used in the context of Judge Cannon's decision to indefinitely postpone the trial. The video questions the lack of a strong legal justification for this decision, suggesting that it may be part of a broader strategy to favor Donald Trump.

Highlights

Judge in Florida has indefinitely postponed the trial of Donald Trump's classified documents case.

Delay is seen as Trump's strategy to avoid criminal charges before the November 2024 US presidential election.

Judge Eileen Cannon has laid out a plan through July to handle other issues, delaying the trial announcement.

Donald Trump is charged with mishandling nearly three dozen National Security records.

Trump's legal team argues that the National Security records found at Mar-a-Lago are his personal property.

Judge Cannon is accused of shielding herself from scrutiny by issuing paperless orders.

Prosecutor Jack Smith may face challenges in removing Judge Cannon from the Mar-a-Lago case.

Judge Cannon's actions are seen as delaying tactics, possibly to protect Trump from trial before the election.

Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, has made rulings that favor Trump in the documents case.

Concerns raised about Judge Cannon's impartiality due to her appointment by Trump.

Judge Cannon's handling of the case is criticized as potentially corrupt and delaying justice.

The trial's delay raises questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the rule of law.

Judge Cannon's decisions are compared to those in autocratic regimes, undermining the legal system.

The possibility of Trump being reelected could lead to the dismissal of cases against him.

Judge Cannon's actions are seen as favoring Trump, who appointed her to her position.

Criticism of the judicial system for allowing a defendant to appoint a judge in their case.

Concerns about the precedent set by allowing a judge to be appointed by the defendant they are presiding over.

The video ends with a call to action for viewers to share their thoughts on Judge Cannon's handling of the case.

Transcripts

00:00

and we have some breaking news now in

00:01

Donald Trump's Federal classified

00:03

documents in case the judge in Florida

00:06

has indefinitely postponed this trial

00:09

delay delay delay is the name of the

00:12

game for Donald Trump this is Trump's

00:14

primary strategy to keep himself free of

00:16

criminal charges in the mara Lago

00:18

documents case prior to the November

00:21

2024 US presidential election and it

00:24

seems to be working quite well in his

00:26

favor but just how far can Donald Trump

00:29

stretch his luck

00:31

that this classified documents case

00:32

against Donald Trump it's too

00:34

complicated and there's too much to do

00:36

right now that she has to work through

00:38

and so she's taken the trial date off of

00:41

the calendar instead laid out a plan

00:44

through essentially the end of July to

00:47

handle other issues in this case largely

00:50

around the use of classified documents

00:52

remember this is a case charging Donald

00:54

Trump with the mishandling of nearly

00:57

three dozen National Security records

01:00

Donald Trump's legal team was somehow

01:02

able to argue that dozens of National

01:04

Security records including nuclear

01:06

secrets found at the mar Lago estate

01:09

were his own personal private property

01:12

and this incredibly has convinced judge

01:14

eileene Cannon to go along with a

01:16

strategy of delaying the case from

01:18

proceedings she gets through all of the

01:21

other stuff she has to do in this case

01:23

that's when she will be announcing when

01:26

the trial will take place the bottom

01:28

line here Jake is exceeding inly

01:30

unlikely uh almost to the point where it

01:33

may be an impossibility for Donald Trump

01:35

to go to trial in this Florida

01:37

classified documents case before the

01:40

November election will prosecutor Jack

01:43

Smith find a way to have judge Eileen

01:45

Cannon remove from the mara Lago case if

01:48

Jack Smith is able to successfully lay

01:50

the groundwork for the removal ask this

01:52

might just happen but we have to

01:54

remember something like that takes time

01:57

and must be done by the book what we are

02:00

seeing now just in the last few weeks

02:03

are glimmers of what it looks like when

02:06

the courts don't

02:08

hold So Yesterday federal judge alen

02:11

Cannon a trump appointee who first made

02:14

name for herself an egregious ruling on

02:16

his behalf in the documents case she

02:19

announced that she was indefinitely

02:20

postponing Donald Trump's criminal trial

02:22

for stealing top secret government

02:24

documents and she did so and this is the

02:26

important part without much of a legal

02:29

justification at all

02:31

furthermore it appears that judge Canon

02:32

is shielding herself from scrutiny by

02:34

the appeals court through her issuing a

02:36

paperless orders which are basically

02:39

simple orders without any

02:41

documentation by using paperless orders

02:43

there's really not much for jacksmith to

02:45

base an appeal on in my opinion it comes

02:48

off as a form of cover so that if the

02:51

need arises she can eventually argue

02:53

that her orders were misunderstood

02:55

misinterpreted or taken out of context

02:58

judge Canon wouldn't have the benefit of

03:00

this cover if every word were in print

03:03

issuing paperless orders is a smart move

03:05

by judge Cannon because it makes a RIT

03:07

of mandemus essentially a legal slap on

03:10

the wrist that much more difficult for

03:12

Jack Smith to execute it also makes it

03:15

magnitude harder to get her removed at

03:18

this point I highly suspect that judge

03:20

Canon's team is being coached behind the

03:22

scenes by much more competent

03:25

folks Smith asked the judge to hurry up

03:27

and rule on what is one of team Trump's

03:30

most Brazen claims that the documents

03:32

Trump hoarded in Mar Lago in a bathroom

03:35

and a bedroom and a basement documents

03:38

containing some of this nation's

03:41

most secret and protected National

03:44

Security Secrets actually belonged

03:48

rightfully to Trump because of the

03:50

presidential records act or the

03:52

P furthermore the way judge Canon

03:55

handles things related to the maralago

03:57

case were any motion from the defense

04:00

gets a hearing a statute of repose for

04:02

the prosecution then a hearing to cover

04:05

the previous hearing and then a long

04:07

wait before issuing a paperless ruling

04:10

almost always benefits the

04:12

defense come a time when he tries to get

04:14

her removed from the case but at this

04:16

point that's premature what Jack Smith

04:18

knows tonight though is that it's very

04:20

possible that he may not be able to

04:22

bring either one of his Federal cases

04:24

against former president Trump before

04:26

the election and the election is a

04:28

significant point on on the calendar

04:30

because if Trump is reelected he can

04:32

have Jack Smith and both of his cases

04:35

dismissed we can speculate that until

04:37

now Jack Smith has been avoiding an

04:39

attempt to have judge Canon removed from

04:41

the case because it would have made a

04:44

trial before the election less likely

04:46

but now a trial before the election is

04:48

virtually impossible whether she stays

04:50

on the case or

04:52

not given the severity and widespread

04:54

consequences of Trump's case judge

04:57

Canon's excuse of I've got a bunch of

04:59

other es to rule on oopsie to delay the

05:02

trial seems to be gross incompetence at

05:05

best and blatantly corrupt at worst I

05:08

mean it's not like there's massive and

05:10

timely public interest in finding out

05:12

whether or Trump is guilty of his

05:13

charges before the presidential election

05:16

right judge Canon's delays combined with

05:19

her prior actions especially when she is

05:21

essentially acted as Trump's own lawyer

05:24

granting him injunctive relief as his

05:26

own lawyers never even asked for makes

05:28

it really seem like Jack Smith has a

05:30

case to bring against her here I'm not a

05:33

lawyer but it certainly seems possible

05:36

she is opting not to settle open

05:38

questions before her which is her choice

05:41

I mean that's her choice and then

05:43

pointing out the fact that they are not

05:44

settled as the reason why she has to

05:46

further delay don't take my word for it

05:49

here's the New York Times in a news

05:50

article writing it up put it quote while

05:53

judge Canon stated reason for pulling

05:55

off putting off the trial indefinitely

05:58

was that a large number of legal issues

06:00

remain up in the air she never mentioned

06:02

that she herself helped allow the Log

06:04

Jam of motions to pile up when it was

06:07

reported that two of her clerks quit in

06:09

the middle of their clerk ships I knew

06:11

that her use of stall tactics would

06:13

happen the I can't keep up with my work

06:16

excuse was probably hatched to get out

06:18

of the spotlight and in the hopes that

06:20

she could keep her head down until it

06:22

all blew over keep in mind Federal clerk

06:25

ships are fairly prestigious and hard to

06:28

acquire and they're not the type of job

06:30

that people quit halfway through the

06:33

fact that she had two of her clerks quit

06:34

on her definitely raises some eyebrows

06:37

either they thought that working for her

06:39

could be detrimental to the resume or

06:41

they genuinely didn't agree with what

06:43

she was doing Canon is by herself as an

06:47

inexperienced judge in the Fort Pierce

06:50

Courthouse a satellite courthouse where

06:52

there is no senior judge there there is

06:54

no you know adult supervision where

06:57

someone is going to take her by the hand

06:59

and help with some of these complex

07:01

matters she's on her own and also some

07:04

of her law clerks have left for a

07:06

variety of reasons so this thing has

07:09

been beset with delays although what

07:12

really worries me is that I'm sure judge

07:14

Canon will have seen attempts to remove

07:15

her coming from a mile away let's assume

07:18

Jack Smith has an airtight case for

07:20

getting her removed from the maralago

07:22

case it's still completely unclear how

07:25

long that process in and of itself would

07:28

take

07:29

then assuming that judge Canon does get

07:31

removed you can bet that it'll be yet

07:33

another much longer process to find

07:35

another Court to try this case in I've

07:38

got to give it to judge Canon though

07:40

she's already done her job as far as

07:41

Trump's Army of minions is concerned

07:44

this right here is basically the real

07:46

life version of do what you must I've

07:48

already won for now it seems to me that

07:51

Trump has cashed in on his appointment

07:53

of Judge Cannon as she prevented a

07:55

felony conviction in the mara Lago

07:57

documents case before the November

07:59

election

08:00

so he stands a better chance of winning

08:02

the presidency oh and keep in mind judge

08:05

Cannon was appointed by Trump after he

08:07

lost in 2020 talk about a last minute

08:11

appointment did she offer any

08:13

explanation other than that it would be

08:15

a lot of

08:16

work uh well I think not just a lot of

08:19

work but what she's saying is that it's

08:21

a lot of really tricky and complex work

08:23

and part of this is frankly that the

08:25

former president again as Scott

08:27

mentioned filed Lots and lots of motions

08:30

so she does have a lot to go through in

08:33

this case now having said that um there

08:37

are cases where there is a very heavy

08:39

and aggressive motion practice and I

08:41

still haven't seen a situation where the

08:44

judge says the best thing to do is take

08:46

it off calendar however we have to keep

08:50

in mind that this isn't the only felony

08:52

conviction that has happened before the

08:54

November election as Donald Trump is

08:56

also on trial for 34 felony counts of

08:59

false ifying business records in the

09:01

first degree at the moment while the

09:04

Sixth Amendment of the United States

09:05

Constitution guarantees a speedy trial

09:08

to the defendant this trial clearly is

09:10

not that I have to say at this point I

09:14

think the headlines might as well read

09:16

judge appointed by defendant still

09:17

hasn't recused delays case again I mean

09:20

there should definitely be a law against

09:22

a judge being appointed by the defendant

09:24

we never needed it before but we sure as

09:27

hell do now you know all of Donald

09:29

Trump's attempts to subvert and sabotage

09:32

the Democratic process to steal the last

09:34

election

09:35

2020 overall the system held I mean

09:40

maybe barely but it held when push came

09:41

to shove the vast majority of people

09:44

involved in the election and

09:45

institutions stared down a novel attempt

09:48

to destroy the rule of law and they did

09:50

the right thing system might have bent

09:52

but it didn't break and while there's a

09:55

Code of Ethics that judges are expected

09:56

to follow in my opinion the problem now

09:59

is that we have in the United States a

10:02

large cohort of Judges specifically

10:04

appointed to achieve political goals and

10:07

these judges have little regard for

10:08

ethics or operating in good faith and

10:11

now we're seeing how poor the

10:13

enforcement mechanisms actually are is

10:15

this inevitably what happens when the

10:17

rules rely on the players in the game

10:19

operating in good faith the rule of law

10:22

which we talk about a lot on the show

10:24

and on this network and venerate is

10:25

really only as good as the people who

10:27

are executing it in good faith

10:30

I mean to be clear the world over there

10:31

are plenty of autography from Egypt

10:34

under cc to Russia under Putin that have

10:37

laws statutes lawyers judiciaries bar

10:42

associations their version of it they

10:44

have all that stuff they just execute

10:46

the law in a way that essentially

10:48

supports a predetermined outcome I'm

10:51

still flabbergasted by how a judge can

10:53

actually be nominated by the defendant

10:55

in a case I mean it's absolutely and

10:58

completely ridiculous if if you stop to

10:59

think about it in the code of conduct

11:02

for United States judges an appearance

11:04

of impropriety means that even if a

11:07

judge believes they can be impartial if

11:09

there are circumstances that could lead

11:11

a person to reasonably question their

11:13

impartiality it could be appropriate for

11:15

recusal a lot of the reasons why there

11:18

have been so many delays have been her

11:20

own decisions to give a lot of

11:23

difference to Donald Trump which is odd

11:26

because you have someone like judge can

11:29

who previously was an a USA an assistant

11:31

us attorney a federal prosecutor uh but

11:34

she has bent over backwards for this

11:36

defendant imagine this if someone was on

11:39

trial and the defendant saved the

11:41

judge's life or killed their dog a

11:43

reasonable person would question the

11:45

judge's ability to be impartial when

11:47

combined with the rulings it just seems

11:50

ridiculous on all levels that I just

11:52

don't understand why more people aren't

11:54

talking about this there are what 19

11:57

other judges not appointed by the

11:58

defense defendant in the 11th Circuit

12:01

Court of Appeals who could have been

12:02

selected for such an important case on

12:05

the flip side if a defendant somehow

12:07

caused harm to a judge I would also be

12:09

asking for the same consideration of

12:11

impartiality for the benefit of the

12:13

defendant in any case for justice to

12:16

Prevail there simply shouldn't be any

12:18

direct connection between the defendant

12:20

and the judge

12:22

whatsoever and we've seen this before

12:24

with judge Canon because even before

12:25

there was an indictment in this case

12:27

judge Canon rejected herself and put a

12:31

hold on the case and granted the special

12:34

Master request even going beyond what

12:36

Trump had asked for because Trump had

12:38

asked for the special Master but didn't

12:40

ask for the whole case to be stopped uh

12:42

but she put a hold on the investigation

12:45

which is really unusual I've never seen

12:46

before a judge get involved in a

12:49

prosecutor's investigation this is

12:51

before any charges were filed what is

12:53

Justice anymore allowing Donald Trump's

12:55

case to be handled by so many judges

12:58

that he himself appointed to Lifetime

13:00

jobs is straight out of a dystopian

13:03

Nightmare and a lot of very smart

13:05

accomplished attorneys and legal experts

13:07

again with different ideological

13:08

backgrounds have said they've simply

13:10

never seen anything quite like what

13:12

Canada is doing by so transparently

13:16

putting her thumb on the proverbial

13:17

scale to delay and and thereby benefit

13:21

the man who put her on the bench in the

13:23

first

13:24

place as likely as Taylor Swift would

13:27

write another song If she had another X

13:29

judge Canon would be first in line for

13:31

Supreme Court if Trump gets

13:33

reelected at what point can we just call

13:36

them out on it when a judge clearly

13:38

wants the next Republican Supreme Court

13:40

position and they'll just kiss as many

13:42

asses and bend as many laws as possible

13:44

for them to get there judge Cannon if

13:47

you're watching this just know we're

13:49

watching you

13:51

too sometimes I can't help but imagine

13:53

that Germany was the same way in the

13:56

1930s life was normal until it wasn't

13:59

we're slowly but surely heating up the

14:01

pot until it boils let's just hope that

14:04

our grandkids will look back upon all of

14:06

this one day and they won't believe how

14:08

ridiculous these days

14:10

are having said all this what do you

14:13

think of Judge Cannon's handling of the

14:15

mara Lago case in my opinion this is a

14:18

pretty clear-cut case much more so than

14:21

any other criminal cases Donald Trump is

14:23

facing and yet judge Canon is able to

14:26

derail it completely should judge Canon

14:29

face any repercussions for her actions

14:31

or should judge Canon be fired out of a

14:34

cannon and into the sun let us know in

14:36

the comment section down below we'd love

14:39

to hear from you and what your thoughts

14:41

are on this entire situation if you like

14:44

the video make sure to hit the like

14:45

button and if you want to see more make

14:47

sure to subscribe to the channel and to

14:49

hit that Bell icon so you're notified as

14:51

soon as we upload our next video you

14:54

don't want to miss what's coming out

14:55

next so thanks for watching and we'll

14:58

see you in the next video goodbye for

15:00

now