Rabbit Gaslit Me, So I Dug Deeper

Coffeezilla
24 May 202418:12

Summary

TLDRThe script investigates the claims made by a tech company about their product, the Rabbit R1, which was marketed as having an AI called Lamb capable of organizing life tasks. The company allegedly presold over $20 million worth of units and raised $30 million in venture capital. However, the investigation reveals that instead of a foundational AI, Rabbit uses a combination of Chat GPT and hardcoded scripts, with search functions handled by a different AI called Perplexity. The company's response to inquiries was evasive and defensive, and there were also data privacy concerns raised. The script concludes that the company may have committed consumer fraud by misleading customers about the capabilities of their product.

Takeaways

  • 🚫 The tech company in question is accused of misleading customers about the capabilities of their AI, named Lamb, within the product 'Orange Box the Rabbit R1'.
  • πŸ“± The Rabbit R1 was marketed as having an AI that could perform various tasks like organizing life, texting friends, and restocking fridges, but it failed to deliver on these promises.
  • πŸ’Έ The company pre-sold over $20 million worth of the Rabbit R1 and raised an additional $30 million in Venture Capital based on the product's purported AI capabilities.
  • πŸ€– The AI, Lamb, is claimed to be a system that can infer and model human actions on computer applications, but this claim is under scrutiny.
  • πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ An investigation revealed that the Rabbit R1 is not using a new foundational AI model but rather Chat GPT with hardcoded scripts, contradicting the company's claims.
  • πŸ” The company's founder, Jesse, made misleading claims about the speed and capabilities of Rabbit compared to Chat GPT, especially in web browsing tasks.
  • πŸ› οΈ Rabbit uses a platform called Playwright for web automation, which is the opposite of the intelligent AI that was advertised.
  • πŸ”— The hardcoded scripts used by Rabbit cannot adapt to changes in user interfaces, which is a significant limitation compared to the advertised AI capabilities.
  • πŸ“Š The company's response to criticism has been defensive, questioning the credibility of critics and avoiding direct answers about the functionality of Lamb.
  • πŸ—£οΈ An anonymous employee claimed that the Lamb as advertised does not exist and was merely a 'marketing term', which raises serious concerns about the company's integrity.
  • πŸ“˜ The source code of Rabbit has been reviewed, revealing hardcoded responses and potential data privacy issues, further undermining the company's claims about privacy and AI.

Q & A

  • What was the main claim about the tech company's product, the Orange Box Rabbit R1?

    -The main claim was that the Orange Box Rabbit R1 contains an AI called Lamb that can organize your life, text your friends, restock your fridge, and perform various tasks upon voice command.

  • How much money was raised through pre-sales and venture capital for the Rabbit R1 project?

    -The company pre-sold over $20 million worth of the Rabbit R1 and raised an additional $30 million in venture capital.

  • What was the initial impression of the product from MKBHD?

    -MKBHD stated that the product was not that great, which was contrary to the marketing claims.

  • What was the primary question the investigator aimed to answer about the Rabbit R1's AI, Lamb?

    -The primary question was whether the AI, Lamb, was a scam and if it actually existed as advertised.

  • What were the functionalities that the Rabbit R1 was supposed to perform using Lamb AI?

    -The Rabbit R1 was supposed to start morning routines, order breakfast, inform people about delays, check the fridge, order ingredients, and perform web actions on behalf of the user.

  • What did the investigation reveal about the actual technology used in the Rabbit R1?

    -The investigation revealed that Rabbit R1 is not using a new foundational AI model but is actually using Chat GPT with hardcoded scripts for web actions.

  • What is the difference between the claimed functionality of Lamb AI and what was actually found in the investigation?

    -The claimed functionality suggested that Lamb AI could intelligently control and interact with websites and applications. However, the investigation found that it uses hardcoded scripts and Chat GPT, which does not involve intelligent interaction but automated, pre-written actions.

  • What is Playwright, and how is it used in the Rabbit R1 according to the investigation?

    -Playwright is a web automation tool used to navigate websites through hardcoded scripts. In the Rabbit R1, it is used to perform actions like ordering food or calling an Uber, rather than using an intelligent AI as claimed.

  • What was the response of the Rabbit team when questioned about the legitimacy of Lamb AI?

    -The Rabbit team became defensive, questioning the investigator's background in AI and machine learning, and suggesting that without expertise in the field, the investigation would lack credibility.

  • What concerns were raised regarding data privacy in the Rabbit R1's source code?

    -There were serious data privacy concerns raised, as certain elements in the source code could potentially be exploited by malicious actors to gain unauthorized access to the replies the R1 has ever given.

  • What was the final assessment of the Rabbit R1's Lamb AI from the perspective of the investigation?

    -The final assessment was that the Rabbit R1 vastly overpromised and underdelivered. The core selling point, Lamb AI, was built on a lie, and the product was essentially Chat GPT with an auto-clicker, not the new foundational AI as advertised.

  • What was the anonymous claim made by a former Rabbit employee regarding Lamb AI?

    -The anonymous claim made by a former Rabbit employee was that Lamb AI, as advertised, does not exist and was merely a marketing term.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ Investigating the 'Rabbit' AI Scam

The speaker expresses skepticism about a tech company's claims regarding their AI product, the 'Orange Box Rabbit R1', which promises to organize life tasks through an AI called 'Lamb'. The company allegedly presold over $20 million worth of these devices and raised $30 million in venture capital. However, after a group investigation, it's revealed that the product isn't using a new AI model as advertised but is instead using Chat GPT with hardcoded scripts. The speaker aims to determine if the AI 'Lamb' is truly a scam, starting by attempting to recreate the product's ad with the device and questioning its capabilities.

05:03

πŸ€– The Illusion of AI in 'Rabbit'

The paragraph delves into the functionality of the Rabbit's AI, 'Lamb', and the company's claims about its capabilities. It's revealed that the AI is not as sophisticated as advertised; instead of being a foundational AI model, it's primarily Chat GPT with hardcoded scripts for web actions. The speaker discusses the limitations of these scripts, which can't adapt to changes in user interfaces, unlike true AI. The company's CEO, Jesse, is shown to be evasive when questioned about the legitimacy of 'Lamb', and the speaker highlights the discrepancy between the product's promises and its actual capabilities.

10:04

πŸ”’ Data Privacy Concerns and Unfulfilled Promises

This section discusses the speaker's concerns about data privacy within the Rabbit's source code, suggesting that there are vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors. The company's privacy claims are called into question due to their tracking practices. The speaker also points out the product's poor performance in tasks like tracking location and finding restaurants, which further undermines the company's credibility. The paragraph ends with the speaker's continued pursuit of the truth about 'Lamb' and the company's defensive response to criticism.

15:06

🚫 The Reality of 'Lamb' and Alleged Consumer Fraud

The final paragraph addresses the core issue of the Rabbit's AI, 'Lamb', and whether it exists as advertised. The speaker argues that the company has overpromised and underdelivered, with the best-case scenario being that 'Lamb' is part of the process for creating automation scripts, and the worst-case scenario being outright consumer fraud. An anonymous employee's claim that 'Lamb' is merely a 'marketing term' and does not exist as described is highlighted. The speaker concludes by questioning the company's integrity and the legitimacy of their product.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Gaslighting

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation where a person makes someone question their own reality or perceptions. In the video, the term is used to describe the tech company's behavior regarding their previous scam, which led to the speaker's decision to investigate their current project, Rabbit.

πŸ’‘Rabbit R1

Rabbit R1 is the product being investigated in the video. It is marketed as an AI-enabled device that can perform various tasks such as organizing life, texting friends, and restocking a fridge. The video's theme revolves around whether the AI inside, called Lamb, is a scam or not.

πŸ’‘AI (Artificial Intelligence)

AI refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines that are programmed to think like humans and mimic their actions. In the context of the video, the Rabbit R1 is supposed to have an AI called Lamb that can perform tasks autonomously, which is a central point of contention in the investigation.

πŸ’‘Lamb

Lamb is the name given to the AI system supposedly inside the Rabbit R1 device. The video questions the existence and functionality of Lamb, as it is claimed to be a new foundational AI model capable of performing complex tasks, which the speaker aims to verify.

πŸ’‘Chat GPT

Chat GPT is a large language model developed by OpenAI, capable of generating human-like text based on the input it receives. The video suggests that Rabbit R1 might be using Chat GPT with hardcoded scripts instead of a new AI model as advertised.

πŸ’‘Hardcoded Scripts

Hardcoded scripts are pre-written lines of code that perform specific actions when executed. The video argues that Rabbit R1 uses these scripts, particularly for tasks like ordering from DoorDash or playing music on Spotify, rather than an intelligent AI as claimed.

πŸ’‘Playwright

Playwright is a platform for automating web pages, allowing scripts to interact with websites. The video reveals that Rabbit R1 uses Playwright for its web actions, which contradicts the claim of having an intelligent AI controlling web pages.

πŸ’‘Maintenance

In the context of the video, 'under maintenance' refers to the state of the Rabbit R1's DoorDash integration when the speaker tries to use it. This indicates a failure in the service, which is part of the evidence suggesting that the AI is not functioning as advertised.

πŸ’‘Perplexity

Perplexity is an off-the-shelf AI used by Rabbit for search functionality, as mentioned in the video. It is highlighted to show that Rabbit relies on existing AI technologies rather than having developed a unique AI model as claimed.

πŸ’‘Data Privacy

Data privacy concerns the protection of personal information from unauthorized access or misuse. The video raises concerns about Rabbit's source code, suggesting it could be exploited to access private information, which contradicts the company's claims about its commitment to privacy.

πŸ’‘Consumer Fraud

Consumer fraud refers to deceptive practices that result in consumers purchasing products or services under false pretenses. The video concludes by suggesting that Rabbit's marketing of the Lamb AI as a new foundational model could be considered consumer fraud, as it may not exist in the way advertised.

Highlights

Tech company's previous scam led to an investigation of their current project, Rabbit.

Rabbit R1's AI, Lamb, was marketed to organize life, text friends, and manage home essentials.

Over $20 million worth of pre-sales and $30 million in Venture Capital were raised based on marketing promises.

MKBHD criticized the product, raising questions about the AI's legitimacy.

Investigation revealed Rabbit is not using a new AI model but rather Chat GPT with hardcoded scripts.

Rabbit's claims of faster performance than Chat GPT are misleading as most of the product is Chat GPT.

The AI's actions, like calling Uber or ordering Door Dash, are performed using Chat GBT 3.5 Turbo.

Hardcoded scripts are used for tasks like playing music on Spotify, which is not indicative of AI.

Rabbit's use of Playwright, a web automation tool, contradicts claims of sophisticated AI.

Researchers accessed part of Rabbit's codebase, revealing the lack of an AI model as promised.

Rabbit admits to using Playwright but denies that it undermines the legitimacy of their technology.

The device's functionality is primarily off-the-shelf software, not the promised AI.

Rabbit's response to criticism was defensive, questioning the credibility of non-experts.

Data privacy concerns were raised due to elements in the source code.

Rabbit's tracking capabilities were found to be inaccurate, with a 100-mile error range.

An anonymous employee claimed that the advertised Lamb AI does not exist and was a marketing term.

The company is accused of overpromising and underdelivering, with potential implications of consumer fraud.

Transcripts

00:00

this tech company gaslit me so hard

00:02

about their previous scam that I decided

00:03

to investigate their current project

00:05

rabbit and what I found was shocking for

00:08

months we've been promised that this

00:09

Orange Box the rabbit R1 has an AI

00:12

inside of it called lamb that can

00:14

organize your life text your friends

00:16

restock your fridge all you had to do

00:18

was ask start my morning

00:21

routine order me an Uber and find me a

00:24

good podcast to pass the time oh and

00:26

tell everybody that I might be late that

00:28

was delicious check the fridge and order

00:31

the ingredients to make that again

00:32

tomorrow now based on marketing like

00:35

this they pre-sold over $20 million

00:37

worth of these and they raised another

00:39

$30 million in Venture Capital only to

00:42

have MKBHD say yeah the product's not

00:44

that great but I bought this thing to

00:46

answer a different question not is it

00:48

good or bad but is the AI the lamb a

00:52

scam well we're going to find out I

00:55

wanted to start by just trying to

00:57

recreate their ad with this thing start

01:00

my morning routine to start your morning

01:02

routine you might consider tasks like

01:05

waking up freshening up having breakfast

01:07

and planning your day how can I assist

01:10

you further with your morning routine

01:12

order me

01:15

breakfast the door Dash rabbit is under

01:17

maintenance sorry for the inconvenience

01:20

and please come back later tell everyone

01:22

I'm going to be

01:26

late I recommend informing the relevant

01:29

parties directly about your delay yeah

01:31

but no you do

01:35

it I'm unable to directly communicate

01:38

with others on your behalf that was

01:40

delicious check the fridge and order the

01:42

ingredients so I can make it

01:46

tomorrow the door Dash rabbit is under

01:49

maintenance yeah it basically failed at

01:52

everything but remember our question is

01:54

not is it good or bad the question is

01:56

does the lamb the AI the large action

01:58

model does the secret sauce of this

02:00

thing exist because the founder and CEO

02:03

claims it's here on your device now he

02:06

claims lamb is a system that can infer

02:08

and model human actions on computer

02:11

applications or as he puts it we use

02:14

lamb to bring AI from words to action

02:18

right this AI is supposed to do things

02:20

on your behalf and so when they'd show

02:23

demos like this where someone is

02:25

planning a trip it does look like the

02:28

lamb is controlling the web page you can

02:30

see this AI clicking through Airbnb by

02:32

itself and it all kind of felt like the

02:34

future it's why people ordered $20

02:36

million worth of these little boxes but

02:39

a group investigation has revealed that

02:41

rabbit is not actually using a new

02:43

foundational AI model at all it's

02:47

actually chat GPT with some hardcoded

02:49

scripts which is funny because Jesse

02:52

says rabbit is faster than chat GPT you

02:55

will also know that the response speed

02:58

is much faster than you using some of

03:00

the assistant apps with web browsing

03:03

such as CHT now that's a very sneaky

03:06

claim when most of your product is chat

03:09

GPT so obviously not faster but you

03:12

wouldn't know that because part of

03:14

rabbit's prompt is quote I will never

03:16

mention I am a large language model

03:19

created by open AI in fact the part

03:22

where they do use a different AI is

03:25

really only search which is why Jesse

03:27

very carefully says rabbit is faster

03:30

than chat GPT with web browsing that's

03:33

the only part of this device where they

03:35

don't really use chat GPT for it but

03:38

they don't use their AI model either

03:41

they use a different off-the-shelf AI

03:43

called perplexity so it's extremely

03:45

misleading to say rabbit is faster than

03:47

chat GPT because most of the product is

03:50

chat GPT but it just can't tell you that

03:53

because it's instructed not to now that

03:55

we understand this let's talk about the

03:57

actual process of how rabbit does more

04:00

than search and it's supposed to get

04:02

things done for you you might think it's

04:04

a sophisticated AI but actually what

04:06

rabbit does when you call in Uber or

04:08

order door Dash is it takes your

04:10

question puts it into chat gbt 3.5 turbo

04:13

and if it's something like play a song

04:15

on Spotify it will use hardcoded scripts

04:18

to navigate websites like Spotify and

04:21

those scripts are not AI this is super

04:26

important this is the part where they

04:28

say yeah we've got this new found AI

04:30

model thing that does the thing no the

04:33

thing pressing the buttons is not

04:36

intelligent rabbit is using a platform

04:38

called playwright which is a web

04:40

automation tool the opposite of

04:43

intelligent Ai and we know this because

04:45

of several researchers who got access to

04:47

part of rabbit's codebase I worked with

04:49

them I'll link them below and I spoke

04:51

with one of them Emily Shepard to

04:53

understand why this distinction AI not

04:55

AI matters this is quite a big deal

04:59

because the way lamb has been observed

05:03

to work doesn't match with what they've

05:05

told us about how it works uh it's meant

05:09

to be an AI live controlling a website

05:13

and understanding that website what they

05:16

have is just a bunch of static commands

05:19

you do this do this do this and the

05:21

problem with that is if a user interface

05:23

changes the website changes it can't

05:26

cope with that so anytime Spotify

05:29

redesign their user interface or anytime

05:31

door Dash redesigns something or even if

05:34

an advert pops up in a new location or

05:37

there's a a capture pops up or or

05:40

something unexpected happens that isn't

05:42

in that very rigid step one step two

05:44

step three step four a flat hard-coded

05:48

playwright script can't cope with that

05:50

and that is the opposite of some

05:53

intelligent AI actually being able to

05:56

understand the page which is the claim

05:58

that had been made that's right

06:00

obviously there's a big difference

06:02

between AI not AI Jesse himself knows

06:05

the difference and made it clear lamb

06:08

wouldn't break like a hard-coded script

06:10

would it doesn't really matter if a app

06:13

completely ramped the UI got so when

06:17

Spotify redo its app and it moves

06:19

podcasts from tabs and then it puts the

06:21

tabs at the lower part or puts it in a

06:23

hamburger drop down it still knows

06:26

that's the word podcast and that's where

06:28

you find podcast inside of Spotify

06:30

exactly because the fundamental

06:32

philosophy logic is that all these

06:33

modern software are designed for human

06:35

eyes to proceed the information and they

06:37

have to have a setting somewhere right

06:40

of course if this were AI it would adapt

06:42

to the user interface changes but it's

06:44

not which is why when apps that rabbit

06:47

supports change they stop working as

06:50

people noticed in videos in Discord even

06:53

I noticed it while testing this device

06:55

door Dash had stopped working presumably

06:58

because of another do I change the door

07:01

Dash rabbit is under maintenance now

07:03

today rabbit actually admits that they

07:06

use playwright but they're not willing

07:08

to admit that lamb whatever it is is not

07:12

really doing a lot Jesse responds to say

07:15

lamb is just playright is equal to say

07:17

chat GPT is just a chat we use playright

07:20

as part of a component to operate lamb

07:23

that doesn't mean the research and

07:24

technology is fake so what they're

07:27

saying is lamb is not not these

07:30

hard-coded scripts but kind of they also

07:32

admit these scripts exist maybe lamb

07:34

interacts with the scripts maybe they

07:36

create them but even if that's true it's

07:39

not what they promised either way

07:41

everything that matters on this device

07:44

is basically off the shelf software the

07:46

web actions are done by hard-coded

07:48

scripts everything else is done by chat

07:50

GPT or perplexity so there's not much

07:53

reason for the lamb to do anything

07:56

whatever it actually does and we're

07:59

already so far from what Jesse

08:01

originally promised which I have to show

08:03

you again he kept saying was AI not a

08:06

script that would be doing all these

08:08

actions for you we have a super close

08:10

computer that when Jason talks to his

08:13

rabbit R1 about ordering a a hamburger

08:17

from door Dash what's going on is that

08:19

we first see if Jason if Jason's Lo

08:22

logging with door Dash or loging with

08:23

Uber Eats right and we saw okay Jason

08:26

chose door Dash and then on on that

08:28

super host a lamb is interacting

08:32

virtually with a door Dash app or

08:35

website a interface and you don't see

08:38

all of that because all of a sudden this

08:39

is done all at once because it's it's AI

08:42

he couldn't be clearer the lamb is

08:44

interacting because it's AI this is a

08:47

flat out lie at least currently which he

08:50

says the lamb is here now now I reached

08:52

out over and over to the rabbit team

08:55

pressing them again and again on this

08:57

issue what does the lamb do and they

09:00

kept saying oh playright yeah that's the

09:02

thing but it's just part of how the lamb

09:04

controls things but I kept asking what

09:06

does that mean how does this thing

09:08

exactly work if the scripts are doing

09:10

the work what does lamb do and

09:13

eventually I got to the point where I

09:14

just questioned look is this real do you

09:17

have proof that this lamb can do all

09:19

these amazing things and I should have

09:21

known I was going to get into trouble

09:23

here because Jesse the CEO says anyone

09:25

challenging the lamb legitimacy I

09:27

automatically become super defensive

09:30

and that was true here's part of the

09:32

rabbit team's response to me to start

09:34

off I would love to know more about your

09:35

background in Tech because if you you're

09:37

not specialized in AIA machine learning

09:39

any conclusion resulting from this

09:41

conversation will have no real

09:42

credibility or value from any audience

09:45

because this is a technical discussion

09:46

in Ai and machine learning we welcome

09:49

you to invite experts with valid

09:50

certificates from the field to further

09:52

look into this now look I found this

09:55

wild for a company that raised 30

09:57

million in Venture sold 20 million

09:59

product to be feisty about questioning

10:02

their product when it does not work as

10:04

advertised and we found out it's using

10:06

hard-coded scripts instead of AI how can

10:09

they be surprised people are going to

10:10

question what their thing actually does

10:13

but I also think it's funny they should

10:14

say that I should invite experts to look

10:16

into this because I'm not nearly the

10:19

first person to point these problems out

10:21

several people who as I said I spoke

10:23

with have had issues with this device

10:25

theyve looked at the code base they've

10:27

also claimed they couldn't find the lamp

10:29

others have jailbroken the R1 got into

10:31

rabbit's Cloud to play Doom and despite

10:34

rabbit saying they welcome credible

10:36

critics their reaction has been anything

10:39

but welcoming Emily who we spoke to

10:41

earlier pointed out back in January that

10:44

capture would be a big concern for the

10:45

lamp and Jesse's response is sorry I

10:48

work for my team I don't work for you so

10:50

you need to check my calendar before you

10:52

command me to answer anything now but

10:54

fast forward to today Capa is a huge

10:57

problem in fact specifically with Uber

10:59

we had to answer 10 different captas

11:02

adding up a bunch of dice in order to

11:05

get get it working it was a giant pain

11:08

it took us several tries I began to

11:10

wonder if I was actually part robot

11:11

myself but the point is getting

11:14

defensive about the problem didn't make

11:16

the problem go away and the same is true

11:19

about getting defensive about the lamb

11:21

just because you tell people they have

11:23

to be an expert to ask you questions

11:25

won't stop the questions or the problems

11:28

but now I want to take a quick detour

11:30

into the source code of the rabbit

11:32

itself because I also have reviewed

11:34

parts of the source code and I have

11:35

serious data privacy concerns there are

11:39

things in this codebase and I can't

11:41

share it for reasons that will become

11:42

obvious there are things that malicious

11:45

actors could use to get any access to

11:47

the replies the R1 has ever given now of

11:50

course rabbit might say they've

11:52

dedicated a huge picture of a lock on

11:54

their web page to privacy so you might

11:55

think they're serious about it but this

11:57

is the same company that if if you read

11:59

the fine print they're tracking your

12:01

precise geographic location and collect

12:03

that data the only consolation prize is

12:05

this thing is shockingly bad at tracking

12:07

you which I found out while looking for

12:10

restaurants find me a restaurant near

12:13

here looking it up

12:17

now Venetian Hot Plate sanan restaurant

12:20

and Butter Churn are highly rated

12:22

restaurants in Porter

12:23

ranses for

12:25

abroad I'm not in pantis

12:34

let me see what I can find for

12:36

restaurants near you in Austin Texas

12:38

consider the following options I'm not

12:41

in Austin an Italian restaurant in

12:43

downtown I'm not in Austin

12:49

Texas I use the internet connection to

12:52

know where the R1 device is roughly

12:54

located in order to provide you with

12:56

you're off by about 100 miles

12:59

[Music]

13:01

thank you for the clarification let me

13:03

refine the search for restaurants in

13:05

your approximate

13:16

location is it going to doing it is it

13:18

going to do

13:19

it it just stopped it

13:23

just yeah I found its GPS to be really

13:26

bad nevertheless I didn't want to take

13:29

any chances for my next experiments

13:31

which is why when I use this thing I'm

13:33

not in the $10 million Studio at all I'm

13:35

in an $100 Motel here to show you that

13:39

once you know the code base you can make

13:40

some surprising predictions about what

13:43

this thing's going to do for example

13:44

when I tell the rabbit to play anything

13:48

You' might think that'd be random music

13:50

going now but it's not going to be it's

13:52

going to be the

13:55

Beatles how did I know that stop stop

13:58

stop

14:01

stop

14:04

stop stop stop stop

14:09

stop stop thank you uh the reason I know

14:14

it's going to do that is because it's

14:16

hardcoded to do so in their prompting

14:19

they say if the user is going to say

14:21

play anything they should play The

14:24

Beatles even when you

14:26

specify when I say play anything don't

14:28

play play The Beatles got

14:33

it

14:36

understood play

14:38

anything it's still okay starting the

14:41

music player

14:44

now another Beetle song uh I don't have

14:48

the copyrights to that so we'll stop it

14:50

right there all right back now in the

14:51

$10 million studio for real no green

14:54

screen back here look this product is

14:57

obviously bad by the way it's off right

14:59

right now but again what really upsets

15:01

me is not that it's bad it's that the

15:03

core selling point of this product is

15:05

built on a lie and that lie is the Lamb

15:08

they said it was on your device now it's

15:11

a new foundational Ai and the reason

15:13

this company had to sell you a $2

15:15

product was this AI was so powerful

15:18

large action models concept and test

15:20

results are so powerful now we decided

15:24

to make a oneof kind mobile device yeah

15:28

lamb what the justification for this

15:30

hunk of plastic but where is it they say

15:34

it's here now he said it was going to be

15:37

controlling your apps but it's not it's

15:39

hardcoded pre-written playwright scripts

15:42

and look the best rabbit at this point

15:45

can argue and it's hard to falsify or

15:48

verify is that lamb might be part of the

15:51

process of creating those automation

15:53

hard-coded scripts for playright as in

15:56

like no it's not live controlling your

15:58

web browser or their web browser uh but

16:00

it can create the code that does it

16:02

maybe that's what they're going to argue

16:04

but guess what playright already has a

16:07

tool for this it's called code gen where

16:09

it watches what you do and just

16:11

automatically creates the automation

16:13

code for you no fancy AI required so I

16:16

think the best thing you could say at

16:18

this point about Jesse and rabbit is

16:20

that they vastly over promised and

16:22

underd delivered the worst you could say

16:24

is this is Consumer Fraud because even

16:27

considering the possibility and it is

16:28

one

16:29

that lamb is a real research project

16:31

that's not ready why lie about it being

16:34

here now why not come clean and admit

16:37

that whatever you're doing today is not

16:40

what you originally advertised this is

16:42

not a new foundational AI controlling

16:44

websites like a human it's chat

16:48

GPT with an auto clicker but there's one

16:51

last thing I want to say I was able to

16:53

speak with an employee who worked for

16:55

rabbit and on the condition of anonymity

16:58

what they told me was that lamb as

17:00

advertised does not exist and that lamb

17:03

was a quote marketing term now given

17:06

that this was a very serious accusation

17:09

I reached out one final time to the

17:10

rabbit team to hear their response

17:15

[Music]

17:46

[Music]