DON'T buy a Screen Protector before watching this.
TLDRIn this video, the host compares three different tiers of screen protectors for iPhones, ranging from $1 to $80, testing their claims of hardness and smudge resistance. Despite the price difference, the $1 and $40 protectors show similar levels of damage after tests, with both failing at level 6 of the hardness scale. In contrast, the $80 sapphire screen protector performs remarkably well, showing no damage until level 8 and surviving a brick test with only minor scratches, proving its superior quality over the glass protectors.
Takeaways
- đź’° Price doesn't necessarily equate to quality in screen protectors; a $0.60 one can claim similar features as a $40 one.
- 📦 The $1 tempered glass protector offers two protectors and additional useful items in the package.
- 🛡️ The $40 tempered glass protector from Spec comes with a template tool for easier application, but only one protector.
- đź’Ž The $80 sapphire screen protector from Shelrus is marketed as being made of 99.99% pure sapphire and having a 9H hardness level.
- đź“Ź All three screen protectors visually appear to have similar designs, with the $1 and $80 options having more appealing cutouts and edges.
- đź’ˇ The cheapest screen protector surprisingly applied the best in terms of brightness and bubble elimination.
- 🔨 Scratch tests revealed that both the $1 and $40 glass protectors were not as durable as claimed, only withstanding up to level 5 and 6 on the hardness picks.
- đź’Ť The $80 sapphire protector performed significantly better, withstanding up to level 8 hardness picks before showing minor markings.
- đź“Š Dropping tests with a hammer showed that neither the $1 nor the $40 protectors could withstand significant impact, unlike the sapphire one.
- 🧱 A brick test ultimately demonstrated the sapphire protector's superior durability, although it still showed signs of damage.
- đź’ˇ The video concludes that while glass screen protectors are generally recommended, there's no need to spend exorbitantly on them, and if one chooses to, the sapphire protector justifies the higher cost.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is a comparison of different screen protectors for smartphones, ranging in price from $1 to $80, to determine if there is a significant difference in quality and protection.
How many screen protectors were tested in the video?
-Three screen protectors were tested in the video: a $1 tempered glass, a $40 tempered glass from a company called Spec, and an $80 sapphire screen protector from a company called Shelrus.
What was the first observation made about the screen protectors?
-The first observation was that regardless of price, all screen protectors claimed to offer similar features and qualities, such as being high endurance, smudge resistant, and tempered glass made for the same phone.
What was the result of the scratch test using hardness picks?
-The scratch test revealed that both the $1 and $40 glass screen protectors were not truly level 9 in hardness as claimed, and could be scratched with level 6 and 7 picks. In contrast, the $80 sapphire screen protector withstood level 6 and 7 picks and only showed faint markings at level 8, requiring a level 9 pick to create a deeper gouge.
What was the outcome of the hammer test from a height of 20 centimeters?
-The hammer test from a height of 20 centimeters did not cause significant damage to any of the screen protectors, but one of the scratches on the $40 glass protector turned into a crack.
What was the result of the brick test on the screen protectors?
-The brick test resulted in significant damage to both the $1 and $40 glass screen protectors, effectively destroying their screens. However, the $80 sapphire screen protector remained relatively intact, showing that it was indeed more durable than the glass options.
What is the conclusion drawn from the video regarding the value of expensive screen protectors?
-The conclusion is that one does not need to spend $40 on a screen protector for adequate protection. While the $1 glass screen protector offered decent value, the $80 sapphire screen protector provided significantly better protection for those willing to invest more.
What additional tools or features did the expensive screen protectors come with?
-The expensive screen protectors came with more reassuring packaging, a template tool for easier application, and alignment tools included in the box.
What was the role of Surfshark VPN in the video?
-Surfshark VPN was the sponsor of the video. The presenter mentioned that they have been continuously working with Surfshark because they believe it offers good value for money, providing secure and anonymous internet browsing at an affordable price.
How did the presenter feel about the claims made by screen protector manufacturers regarding hardness levels?
-The presenter felt that the claims of level 9 hardness made by the manufacturers of the glass screen protectors were disingenuous, as the scratch test proved they could be scratched at much lower levels.
What is the final recommendation for viewers considering purchasing a screen protector?
-The final recommendation is that for most people, a glass screen protector would suffice and there is no need to spend a large amount on one. However, if someone wants to invest in a higher quality protector, a sapphire screen protector is a better choice due to its superior durability.
Outlines
📱 Comparing Screen Protectors of Varying Prices
This paragraph introduces a comparison of screen protectors with different price points, from 60 cents to $80. The narrator expresses skepticism about the claims made by each product, especially regarding their supposed high endurance, smudge resistance, and tempered glass composition. Three screen protectors are presented: a $1 tempered glass, a $40 tempered glass from Spec, and an $80 sapphire screen protector from Shelrus. The video aims to test these protectors on three new iPhone 12s, sponsored by SurfsharkVPN, to see if there is a significant difference in quality and performance among them.
đź’¸ Analyzing the Value of Expensive Screen Protectors
The narrator discusses the visual and practical aspects of the three screen protectors. Despite the price difference, there is no significant visual difference between the $1 and $80 protectors. The $1 protector has a simple design with a single cutout, while the $40 one has a unique camera cutout. The $80 sapphire protector offers a seamless design and a slightly smoother touch. The narrator questions the value of expensive screen protectors and sets up tests to evaluate their strength and durability, using hardness picks to scratch the protectors. The $1 and $40 protectors are found to be less resistant to scratches, with the $40 one only slightly more durable. In contrast, the sapphire protector withstands up to level 8 hardness picks, showing its superior quality.
📉 The Outcome of Dropping Phones with Different Screen Protectors
The paragraph details a drop test conducted to assess the effectiveness of the screen protectors in protecting the iPhone 12s from damage. Despite the careful setup, the $1 and $40 glass protectors fail to prevent significant damage to the phones upon impact. Surprisingly, the $80 sapphire protector performs exceptionally well, showing minimal damage even after being hit with a heavy brick. The narrator concludes that while glass screen protectors are generally recommended, one does not need to spend exorbitant amounts on them. However, for those willing to invest in a high-quality protector, the sapphire option proves to be worth the cost. The video ends with a sponsorship mention for SurfsharkVPN, which the narrator highly recommends for its value and service.
Mindmap
Keywords
đź’ˇScreen Protector
đź’ˇTempered Glass
đź’ˇSapphire Screen Protector
đź’ˇHardness Scale
đź’ˇScratch Resistance
đź’ˇDrop Test
đź’ˇProduct Sponsorship
đź’ˇValue for Money
đź’ˇConsumer Protection
đź’ˇTech Review
Highlights
Screen protectors of varying prices claim to offer the same features, raising questions about their actual differences.
The one-dollar tempered glass screen protector comes with two protectors and additional installation accessories.
The forty-dollar Spec tempered glass screen protector offers more reassuring packaging but only includes one sheet of glass.
The eighty-dollar Shelrus sapphire screen protector is marketed as being made from 99.99% pure sapphire and having a hardness of 9 on the Mohs scale.
All three screen protectors claim to be level 9 in hardness, but this claim is questionable and potentially misleading.
The one-dollar screen protector has a small single cutout for the earpiece and a simple design.
The forty-dollar screen protector features a unique cutout for camera lenses but is not as aesthetically pleasing.
The eighty-dollar sapphire screen protector has disappearing edges and a slightly silkier feel to the touch.
None of the screen protectors significantly restrict the brightness of the screens.
The cheapest screen protector applied with the best result, suggesting that price does not directly correlate with performance.
The sapphire screen protector remains unscratched even after being subjected to level 7 on the Mohs scale.
The glass screen protectors' claims of being level 9 in hardness are disingenuous, as they can be scratched with level 6 and 7 picks.
The sapphire screen protector is the only one that withstands the hammer test without significant damage.
When dropped from a height of 40 centimeters, both the one-dollar and forty-dollar glass protectors crack at the point of impact.
The sapphire screen protector shows less damage after being hit with a brick, making it technically usable.
There is no need to spend a large amount on a glass screen protector, as the fundamental material is relatively inexpensive.
Sapphire screen protectors are recommended for those willing to spend a significant amount on protection, as they offer superior performance.
The video concludes that while glass screen protectors are generally recommended, one should not overspend on them, and sapphire is a better option for those who can afford it.