Undetectable AI Vs Word AI Vs Quillbot - Which Is The Best AI Rewriter?
TLDRIn this video, three popular AI rewriting tools are compared to determine their effectiveness in bypassing AI detection tools like originality.ai. The tools tested are Undetectable AI, WordAI, and Quillbot. Starting with content from ChatGPT, the content is initially 100% AI detected. Undetectable AI and WordAI are both shown to reduce AI detection scores significantly, with WordAI achieving a slightly higher human rating in one test. Quillbot, however, performs poorly, especially with the latest AI updates. The narrator suggests that while Undetectable AI tends to provide better results more quickly, WordAI is a close second and can improve with multiple rewrites. The video concludes by emphasizing the importance of creating high-quality content that satisfies the search query, noting that even AI-generated content can rank well if it is in-depth and valuable.
Takeaways
- 📝 The video compares three AI tools: Undetectable AI, WordAI, and Quillbot, focusing on their ability to rewrite content and bypass AI detection tools like originality.ai.
- 📈 The original content generated by ChatGPT's GPT 3.5 model is 100% AI detected, providing a baseline for comparison.
- 🔄 Undetectable AI is noted as a powerful tool for rewriting content, with a simple interface and good results in the presenter's experience.
- 🖋 WordAI offers an 'Avoid AI Detection' feature and allows for adjusting the level of change to the content, with 'Change More' yielding more human-like results.
- 📉 Quillbot's performance was not fully tested due to lack of access to its paid features, but it was shown to have difficulty bypassing AI detection, especially with the latest updates to AI detection tools.
- 🤖 After using Undetectable AI, the content's AI detection score dropped from 100 to 33, indicating a significant improvement.
- 📚 WordAI's output, with the 'Change More' setting, resulted in 44% original content, which was slightly better than Undetectable AI's 33% in the first test.
- 🔍 Quillbot's standard model scored 1% original and 99% AI, suggesting it is less effective at evading AI detection compared to the other tools.
- 🧯 A second test with WordAI on a different topic (becoming a firefighter) resulted in a 46% original content score, which is a balanced outcome.
- 🚀 Undetectable AI excelled in the second test, achieving an 89% original content score with only 11% AI content, showcasing its potential for high-quality rewrites.
- 🎯 The presenter suggests that while Undetectable AI generally provides better results, WordAI is a close second and can be effective with multiple rewrites.
- ✍️ The importance of creating high-quality, in-depth content that satisfies search queries is emphasized, noting that even AI-generated content can rank well if it meets these criteria.
Q & A
What is the main purpose of the video?
-The main purpose of the video is to compare three AI tools—Undetectable AI, Word AI, and Quillbot—to determine which one is the best at rewriting content to bypass AI detection tools like originality.ai.
How does the video start?
-The video starts by generating a blog post using the GPD 3.5 model from chatgpt, which is about the art of public speaking.
What is the initial AI detection score for the content generated by chatgpt?
-The initial AI detection score for the content generated by chatgpt is 100%, meaning it is fully detected as AI-generated.
How does Undetectable AI work?
-Undetectable AI works by allowing users to paste in AI-generated content and then clicking the 'humanize' button to rewrite the content, aiming to bypass AI detection tools.
What setting in Word AI is suggested for more unique and human-generated output?
-The 'change more' setting in Word AI is suggested for more unique and human-generated output.
What was the result of the first test using Undetectable AI on the chatgpt-generated content?
-The result of the first test using Undetectable AI showed an improvement from 100% AI to 33% AI and 67% human rating content.
How did Word AI perform in the first test compared to Undetectable AI?
-In the first test, Word AI performed slightly better than Undetectable AI, achieving a 44% original content score compared to Undetectable AI's 33%.
What was the issue with Quillbot in the test?
-Quillbot showed a high AI detection score of 99% and only 1% original content in the test, indicating it was not as effective as the other two tools in bypassing AI detection.
What was the result of the second test using Undetectable AI on a different blog post about becoming a firefighter?
-In the second test, Undetectable AI was able to achieve an 89% original content score and 11% AI content, showing a significant improvement over the first test.
What is the general advice given at the end of the video regarding AI detection and content creation?
-The general advice given is not to worry too much about AI detection as long as the focus is on creating high-quality content that satisfies the search query. Even with AI-generated content, if the content is in-depth and high quality, it can still rank well in search results.
How can one improve the human content score when using Word AI?
-To improve the human content score when using Word AI, one can rewrite the content a second time, which usually helps in getting a higher human content score and a lower AI detection score.
Which tool is recommended by the video creator as the best for bypassing AI detection?
-The video creator recommends Undetectable AI as the best tool for bypassing AI detection, with Word AI being a close second.
Outlines
🤖 AI Detection Bypass Tools Comparison
The video begins with an introduction to testing three AI tools designed to rewrite and humanize content to avoid detection by AI detection platforms like originality.ai. The tools in question are undetectable.ai, WordAI, and Quill Bot. The process starts by generating a blog post using the GPT 3.5 model from chatgpt, which is then tested for its AI rating score. The initial content is found to be 100% AI detected. The video proceeds to demonstrate the use of each tool, beginning with undetectable.ai, which is noted for its ease of use and effectiveness. The content is then pasted into WordAI with a setting to change more for a more unique output. Lastly, Quill Bot is used, but only the introduction paragraph is tested due to lack of access to the full content. The results from the first test show varying levels of originality and AI content, with undetectable.ai and WordAI performing relatively well, while Quill Bot's performance is less satisfactory. The video concludes with a second test on another topic, 'how to become a firefighter,' and reiterates that while undetectable.ai generally outperforms WordAI, the results can vary based on the content. It emphasizes the importance of creating high-quality content that meets the search query, regardless of the AI rating.
🔍 Testing AI Detection Tools on Firefighter Content
In the second paragraph, the video script describes a follow-up test using the same AI tools on a different topic, 'how to become a firefighter,' generated by chat GPT using the GPT 3.5 model. The original content from chat GPT is shown to be 100% AI and 0% original. WordAI completes the rewriting process more quickly than undetectable.ai. The WordAI output results in a 46% original and 54% AI score, which is considered a balanced outcome. When undetectable.ai's output is tested, it achieves an impressive 89% original and 11% AI score, demonstrating its effectiveness in this instance. The video script highlights that results can differ based on the content and that undetectable.ai often provides better results more quickly than WordAI. It concludes by advising viewers not to be overly concerned about AI detection, as long as the focus remains on producing high-quality content that satisfies the search query. Additionally, it suggests that if WordAI's first rewrite does not yield high enough originality, a second rewrite can improve the results.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Rewriter
💡AI Detection Tools
💡Originality.ai
💡Humanize
💡Content Bypass
💡GPT 3.5 Model
💡WordAI
💡Quillbot
💡Public Speaking
💡Firefighter
💡High-Quality Content
Highlights
The video compares three AI tools: Undetectable AI, Word AI, and Quillbot, for their ability to rewrite and humanize content to bypass AI detection tools like originality.ai.
Content is initially generated using the GPD 3.5 model to create a blog post on the art of public speaking.
The original content from Chat GPT is 100% AI detected.
Undetectable AI is a newer tool that offers good results in bypassing AI detection.
Word AI allows users to rewrite articles and has an 'avoid AI detection' feature.
Changing the setting to 'change more' in Word AI results in more unique and human-like output.
Quillbot is tested but the presenter does not have a paid plan, limiting the test scope.
After using Undetectable AI, the content's AI detection score drops to 33% human and 67% AI.
Word AI's output results in 44% original content, slightly better than Undetectable AI's 33%.
Quillbot's rewrite of the intro paragraph is 99% AI, indicating it's not as effective for bypassing AI detection.
A second test is conducted with a blog post on becoming a firefighter using GPT 3.5 model.
Word AI's rewrite of the firefighter blog post results in a 46% original and 54% AI content score.
Undetectable AI achieves an 89% original and 11% AI content score for the firefighter article in a single rewrite.
The presenter's experience shows that Undetectable AI often provides better and quicker results compared to Word AI.
Rewriting content multiple times in Word AI can improve the human content score and lower the AI detection score.
The presenter suggests not worrying too much about AI detection as long as the content is high quality and satisfies the search query.
The video concludes that Undetectable AI is the preferred tool, with Word AI as a close second.
Google allows AI-rated content as long as it is high quality and relevant to the search topic.
For a higher human content score with Word AI, the presenter recommends rewriting the content a second time.