P. Diddy Trafficking Investigation: Breaking Down The Facts

Law&Crime Network
27 Mar 202448:52

Summary

TLDRThe discussion revolves around the recent raids conducted on homes linked to rapper and entertainment mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs by Homeland Security, in connection to an ongoing investigation. Despite various civil lawsuits accusing Diddy and others of serious crimes, including sex trafficking and assault, he has not been criminally charged. His associate, Brendan Paul, was arrested for drug possession. Diddy's attorney claims the raids were a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations. The conversation delves into the legal implications, potential charges, and the process of gathering and reviewing evidence in such cases.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 The transcript discusses ongoing investigations and raids conducted at properties linked to Sean 'Diddy' Combs by Homeland Security in connection to allegations of sex trafficking, sexual assault, and other serious accusations.
  • 🚨 Diddy has not been criminally charged in relation to these allegations, and the raids were part of evidence-gathering efforts to determine the veracity of the claims made in civil lawsuits.
  • 🏠 The raids took place at homes in Los Angeles and Miami, with the presence of armed personnel and the use of tactics typically reserved for situations where there is a risk of firearms.
  • 🤝 Diddy's attorney, Aaron Dyer, criticized the authorities for the 'excessive show of force and hostility exhibited by authorities' during the raids and described the investigations as a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations.
  • 📜 The legal panel discussed the potential for RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) charges if there is sufficient evidence of an organized criminal enterprise, which could carry heavy sentences.
  • 🔎 The involvement of Homeland Security suggests a focus on human trafficking aspects of the case, as they have been increasingly involved in such investigations at the federal level.
  • 🤔 The panelists questioned the specifics of the allegations, such as the definition of sex trafficking and the roles of different individuals involved, including名人 like Prince Harry, whose connection to Diddy was mentioned in a civil lawsuit but without direct accusations.
  • 📌 The legal process was discussed, including the potential need for a grand jury to review evidence for an indictment and the possibility of civil claims having criminal bases that can be investigated further.
  • 🔏 The issue of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) was raised, with the panel noting that NDAs cannot cover up criminal activities and that participants in alleged crimes can still be compelled to testify.
  • 🌐 The global community is watching the case closely, with the potential for international implications if Diddy were to flee the country or if there are connections to incidents occurring outside the U.S.

Q & A

  • What triggered the raids on properties linked to Diddy?

    -The raids were conducted by Homeland Security in Los Angeles and Miami as part of an ongoing investigation related to accusations against Diddy, including sex trafficking, sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence.

  • How did Diddy react during the raids?

    -Diddy was reportedly seen pacing back and forth outside of a Miami Airport, accompanied by some family members. He was not detained or arrested but cooperated with authorities.

  • What was the outcome for Diddy's associate following the raids?

    -Diddy's associate, alleged drug mule Brendan Paul, was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine and marijuana.

  • What was Diddy's legal team's response to the raids?

    -Diddy's attorney, Aaron Dyer, criticized the raids as a 'gross overuse of military level force' and described them as part of a 'premature rush to judgment' and a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations.

  • Has Diddy been criminally charged in connection to the allegations?

    -As of the latest updates, Diddy has not been criminally charged in connection with any of the allegations. However, several civil lawsuits have been filed accusing him and others of serious crimes.

  • Why was Homeland Security involved in the raids?

    -Homeland Security conducted the raids due to their authority and involvement in investigating human trafficking, which is one of the accusations against Diddy.

  • What is sex trafficking in the context of the allegations against Diddy?

    -Sex trafficking, in this context, involves transporting someone across state lines for the purpose of engaging in sexual misconduct, which is part of the civil allegations against Diddy.

  • Is Prince Harry implicated in any of the lawsuits against Diddy?

    -Prince Harry is mentioned due to his celebrity connection with Diddy, but there is no implication or accusation against him in any criminal or unethical activities related to Diddy's cases.

  • What could Diddy potentially be charged with based on the information known?

    -Based on the civil complaints, Diddy could potentially face charges related to human and sex trafficking, which could carry a sentence of up to 25 years if proven.

  • What determines if a case like Diddy's is federal or state?

    -The nature of the crimes, such as human trafficking which affects interstate commerce and involves federal authorities like Homeland Security, typically determines if a case is federal. The involvement of federal agencies indicates a federal investigation.

Outlines

00:00

🚓 Homeland Security Raids Linked to Diddy

Homeland Security conducted raids at properties in Los Angeles and Miami connected to rapper and entertainment mogul Diddy. These actions are part of an investigation led by the Southern District of New York, related to several civil lawsuits accusing Diddy of sex trafficking, sexual assault, and other serious allegations. Despite the raids, Diddy was seen outside a Miami Airport and has not been detained or arrested. His associate, Brendan Paul, however, has been arrested for possession of controlled substances. Diddy's legal representative claims the raids involved excessive force and were part of a prejudiced 'witch hunt' against Diddy, who has not been criminally charged in relation to the allegations.

05:01

🔍 Legal Analysis of the Diddy Investigation

The investigation surrounding Diddy includes potential charges of sex trafficking, with a focus on the transportation of individuals across state lines for illicit purposes. Legal analysts discuss the nuances of trafficking laws and the potential implications for Diddy. There's speculation about the use of RICO charges due to the organized nature of the alleged crimes. Additionally, the involvement of high-profile names like Prince Harry in the civil lawsuits, although not accused of any wrongdoing, highlights the complex web of associations in high-profile cases. The federal nature of the investigation suggests significant legal hurdles and the potential for serious charges if evidence supports the allegations.

10:03

🤔 Public and Legal Reactions to the Raids

The public and legal reactions to the raids on Diddy's properties are mixed, with discussions on the appropriateness of the force used during the operations. Legal experts weigh in on the implications of the raids, the potential charges that could arise, and the evidence that might be sought by authorities. The conversation also touches upon the procedural aspects of federal investigations, including the issuance of search warrants and the potential timeline for charges. The role of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and the legal obligations of individuals aware of criminal activities are also examined, highlighting the complexities of high-profile legal battles.

15:04

📹 Impact of Evidence and Legal Proceedings

The discussion delves into the potential impact of the evidence collected during the raids, including electronic devices and possible video recordings. The timing and coordination of federal raids are analyzed, along with the implications of any evidence that may implicate other celebrities or associates of Diddy. The conversation also explores the potential legal defenses and the challenges faced by the prosecution in high-profile cases involving numerous witnesses and complex legal issues. The importance of corroborating evidence and the role of civil lawsuits in shaping criminal investigations are emphasized, providing insight into the legal strategies that might be employed by both sides.

20:05

🔎 Scrutiny of Diddy's Legal and Social Circle

This segment examines the scrutiny surrounding Diddy's social and legal circle, particularly focusing on the involvement of his associates and family members in the allegations. Legal analysts discuss the potential liabilities for those aware of or participating in the alleged crimes, drawing parallels to other high-profile cases. The conversation also addresses the public's perception of Diddy's actions and the broader implications for his career and reputation. Questions about the enforcement of NDAs, the handling of evidence, and the possibility of additional victims coming forward are considered, highlighting the ongoing complexity of the case.

25:07

🌐 Broader Implications and Legal Considerations

The broader implications of the investigation into Diddy are discussed, including the potential for charges to be expanded to include other individuals involved in the alleged activities. Legal experts consider the challenges of prosecuting high-profile cases, the role of public opinion, and the impact of celebrity status on legal proceedings. The segment also explores the possible outcomes of the case, including the impact on Diddy's personal and professional life, and the potential for broader conversations about accountability and justice in the entertainment industry.

30:07

📌 Concluding Thoughts on the Diddy Investigation

In conclusion, the discussion summarizes the key points of the investigation surrounding Diddy, reflecting on the legal, social, and ethical implications of the case. The importance of due process, the potential for further legal action, and the ongoing public interest in the case are emphasized. The segment underscores the complexity of legal battles involving high-profile figures and the multifaceted nature of the allegations against Diddy. The conversation ends with a call for careful consideration of the evidence and the legal standards required to pursue justice in such high-stakes cases.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Homeland Security

Homeland Security refers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, a federal agency tasked with public security, dealing with terrorism, border security, immigration and customs, cyber security, and disaster prevention and management. In the context of the video, Homeland Security conducted raids on properties linked to the rapper and producer Diddy in Los Angeles and Miami as part of an investigation into allegations of sex trafficking, sexual assault, and other serious crimes. The involvement of Homeland Security indicates the severity and nature of the allegations, suggesting they might involve human trafficking or other activities that fall under the agency's purview.

💡Sex trafficking

Sex trafficking is a form of modern slavery involving the exploitation of individuals through coercion, deception, or force for the purpose of sexual exploitation. The script mentions several civil lawsuits accusing Diddy and others of sex trafficking among other crimes, highlighting a significant aspect of the ongoing investigation. This concept is central to understanding the severity of the allegations and the legal implications for those involved, indicating that the activities crossed state lines and potentially involved exploitation for sexual purposes.

💡Raids

Raids refer to sudden attacks or incursions by law enforcement into specific locations to search for evidence or apprehend suspects. The video script discusses Homeland Security conducting raids at homes linked to Diddy in Los Angeles and Miami, indicating law enforcement's active pursuit of evidence related to the allegations of sex trafficking and other crimes. These raids are a critical moment in the investigation, representing a tangible action taken by authorities in response to the accusations.

💡Civil lawsuits

Civil lawsuits are legal disputes between individuals or entities where the plaintiff seeks compensation or remedy for damages caused by the defendant's actions. In this context, Diddy faces several civil lawsuits accusing him of sex trafficking, sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence. These lawsuits are significant because they not only publicize the allegations but also may influence public perception and could potentially lead to criminal charges if they provide evidence of illegal activities.

💡Cooperation with authorities

This phrase indicates Diddy's response to the law enforcement actions taken against him. Despite the raids on his properties, he was not detained or arrested but cooperated with authorities. This cooperation could involve providing information, allowing searches without resistance, or other forms of assistance to the investigation. It's a crucial detail that illustrates his stance towards the allegations and the ongoing investigation at this stage.

💡RICO charges

RICO, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States. The video script suggests that the investigation into Diddy might consider RICO charges, implying that the alleged activities could be part of an organized crime effort, possibly involving a coordinated effort to commit the crimes of which he's accused. This underscores the complexity and severity of the case, suggesting that it's not just about individual acts but potentially about a broader criminal enterprise.

💡Excessive force

Excessive force refers to a situation where law enforcement uses more physical force than necessary to conduct an arrest or a raid. Diddy's legal team accused the authorities of using excessive force during the raids on his properties, framing the law enforcement action as overly aggressive and unnecessarily harsh. This accusation introduces a contentious element into the narrative, suggesting that the raids might have been conducted in a way that could be seen as intimidating or disproportionate to the need to collect evidence.

💡Electronic evidence

Electronic evidence includes any data or information stored on electronic devices that could be relevant to a legal case. In the video script, the collection of electronics during the raids suggests that investigators are looking for digital evidence, such as communications, videos, or documents that could support the allegations against Diddy. The mention of electronic evidence highlights the modern aspect of criminal investigations, where digital data can play a crucial role in building a case.

💡NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement)

An NDA is a legally binding contract that ensures certain information remains confidential. Within the context of the allegations against Diddy, NDAs might have been used to prevent individuals from speaking out about their experiences. However, the script clarifies that criminal activities cannot be protected by NDAs, meaning that if the allegations involve crimes, those agreements would not prevent investigation or prosecution. This detail is crucial for understanding how legal mechanisms are navigated in cases involving powerful individuals and sensitive accusations.

💡Probable cause

Probable cause is a legal standard that requires a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed, which is necessary for obtaining warrants for raids or arrests. In the script, the concept of probable cause underpins the justification for the raids conducted on Diddy's properties, suggesting that authorities had sufficient evidence to believe that searching those locations would yield evidence relevant to their investigation. This concept is fundamental in ensuring that law enforcement actions are grounded in evidence rather than mere suspicion.

Highlights

Homeland Security conducted searches on properties linked to rapper-producer Diddy in Los Angeles and Miami as part of an ongoing investigation by the southern district of New York.

The raids were conducted amid several civil lawsuits accusing Diddy and others of sex trafficking, sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence.

Diddy was reportedly seen pacing outside a Miami Airport during the raids but was not detained or arrested.

Diddy's associate, alleged drug mule Brendan Paul, was arrested for possession of cocaine and marijuana.

Attorney Aaron Dyer responded to the raids, criticizing the excessive use of force and calling the investigation a 'witch hunt' based on meritless accusations.

Diddy has not been criminally charged in connection with any of the allegations, and one of the lawsuits was already settled while others are ongoing.

The legal analyst Brian Buckmire and retired FBI agent Colin Schmidt joined the discussion to provide insights into the legal and investigative aspects of the case.

Homeland Security's involvement in the raids is attributed to their expanded role in investigating human trafficking due to their connection to the border.

The discussion highlighted the difference between human trafficking and the more specific sex trafficking, emphasizing the transportation aspect and participation in sexual misconduct.

The potential charges Diddy could face, including those under RICO, and the possible sentences if found guilty were discussed, with a focus on the civil complaints as the basis for potential criminal charges.

The question of whether Diddy's homes should have been raided, given they are in his daughter's name and the name of the record company, was addressed, with considerations of probable cause and safety.

The legality of NDAs in relation to criminal acts was discussed, clarifying that NDAs cannot cover up crimes and that victims can still cooperate with law enforcement even if they have signed NDAs.

The possibility of Diddy fleeing the country was addressed, with speculation that he might have left the country or is hiding, but no concrete evidence was provided.

The potential for other celebrities to be pursued in the investigation was discussed, emphasizing the high probability of pursuit if there are allegations involving minors or other criminal activities.

The process of gathering evidence through search warrants and the potential for subsequent arrests based on the evidence found was explained, highlighting the strategic nature of such law enforcement actions.

The discussion touched on the potential defense strategies for Diddy, including the argument that the travel involved in the alleged trafficking did not constitute a violation if the participants went willingly.

The issue of privacy and consent in relation to video recordings made by Diddy was raised, questioning the legal implications of such recordings and their admissibility as evidence.

The potential impact of the case on Diddy's life and reputation was discussed, with considerations of the possibility of legal action against the government if the investigation does not lead to charges.

The possibility of Diddy's son being implicated in the case was addressed, with a focus on the evidence needed for a case against him in relation to the allegations made in the civil lawsuit.

The discussion concluded with speculation on the timeline for the review of evidence collected during the raids and the potential for future developments in the case.

Transcripts

00:00

sea Diddy comes more specifically the

00:03

raids that have been conducted at homes

00:05

linked to the rapper producer

00:06

entertainment Mogul if you're new to the

00:08

story Homeland Security they conducted

00:10

these searches on these properties in

00:12

Los Angeles and Miami reporting

00:14

indicates that this is in connection to

00:15

an ongoing investigation through the

00:17

southern district of New York now the

00:19

raids came amid several different civil

00:22

lawsuits filed in recent months accusing

00:24

the rapper and others of sex trafficking

00:26

sexual assault rape domestic violence it

00:28

goes on and on it's absolutely horrific

00:30

but around the time of these raids Diddy

00:32

was reportedly last seen pacing back and

00:35

forth outside of a Miami Airport there

00:37

was a video that circulated this he was

00:39

accompanied by some family members now

00:40

at the time the 54-year-old rapper was

00:43

not detained he cooperated with

00:45

authorities he was not arrested let's

00:47

make that clear uh however I should tell

00:49

you in the latest development Diddy's

00:51

associate alleged drug mule Brendan Paul

00:54

was arrested in charge but with

00:56

possession of cocaine and marijuana now

00:58

coles's attorney Aaron Dyer responded to

01:01

the raids yesterday saying quote

01:03

yesterday there was a gross overuse of

01:05

military level Force as search warrants

01:07

were executed at Mr colm's residences

01:10

there is no excuse for the excessive

01:12

show of force and hostility exhibited by

01:14

authorities or the way his children and

01:16

employees were treated Dyer went on to

01:19

say that the raids were quote a

01:20

premature rush to Judgment of Mr Colmes

01:23

that is nothing more than a Witch Hunt

01:25

based on meritless accusations made in

01:27

civil lawsuits there has been no finding

01:29

of criminal activity or civil liability

01:31

with any of those allegations Mr Colmes

01:34

is innocent and will continue to fight

01:36

every single day to clear his day his

01:38

name now remember Colmes has not been

01:40

criminally charged in connection with

01:42

any of these allegations one of those

01:43

lawsuits was already settled the other

01:45

ones are still ongoing so that is

01:46

correct there has been no uh he's not

01:49

been found guilty of anything he's not

01:50

been charged there is no civil liability

01:52

yet but as the story develops we are

01:54

going to bring you the very latest and

01:56

there's a lot to get into in the

01:57

meantime we are going to dive into this

01:59

live chat live Q&A for the rest of the

02:01

hour again Facebook X YouTube submit

02:04

your questions we'll bring them on the

02:05

air now to help me answer this you don't

02:07

want to just hear from me I am joined by

02:09

La crime legal analyst Brian buckmire

02:11

who's right here in studio with me and

02:14

retired FBI agent Colin Schmidt out of

02:16

Los Angeles we're gonna get right to it

02:18

gentlemen good to see you um first of

02:20

all Colin were you anywhere near the

02:22

raids in La I think I should ask you

02:24

that first and has your traffic been

02:27

interrupted in any way no no I'm in

02:30

Southwest Riverside County so I wasn't

02:32

down there and that that neighborhood's

02:33

a little bit above my uh my income level

02:36

okay well let me ask you this so we have

02:38

a question now this is from chocolo and

02:41

I'm gonna say this I'm gonna mess up

02:42

these names a lot it's the first step is

02:44

admitting it I'm gonna mess up these

02:45

names a lot chocolo ate milk from

02:49

YouTube H FBI I thought this was

02:51

Homeland Security that rated Diddy's

02:53

Mansions because their specialty is

02:55

investigating human trafficking I throw

02:57

it to you Colin just a general idea

02:59

about the fact that you had the homeland

03:01

security being the ones who actually

03:03

conducted the

03:05

raid well they have the same authorities

03:07

as the FBI does and based upon uh their

03:11

uh their connection to the border and a

03:13

lot of the things are going on there

03:14

they've gotten uh a lot more involved in

03:17

the human trafficking side of the of the

03:19

crimes that are going on in the country

03:21

and frankly they do a fantastic job and

03:24

obviously they had a lot of resources

03:26

there for a reason and I would be

03:28

interested whenever uh we have that

03:30

opportunity to see the affidavit that

03:32

supports that warrant all right so

03:34

that's I'm glad we cleared that part up

03:36

uh because who conducted it tells us a

03:38

lot about this there's also a

03:39

preliminary question I want to now go to

03:41

Brian about uh this is from Nikki's girl

03:44

from YouTube question is they say it's a

03:46

trafficking case so who is he

03:48

trafficking to I get that he is involved

03:51

however who else is involved it's a

03:52

really good question when we talk about

03:54

what exactly is uh sex trafficking what

03:56

are the elements who would he be

03:58

involved with yeah so human trafficking

04:00

and then the more specific sex

04:02

trafficking is simply transporting

04:04

someone that affects interstate commerce

04:06

usually that's just traveling across

04:08

state lines and participating in sexual

04:11

misconduct in one way shape or form so

04:13

if you look at the Cassie lawsuit or you

04:15

look at the Rodney Jones Jr lawsuit

04:17

where there are civil allegations that

04:19

people were brought across state lines

04:21

for the purpose of of coursing them to

04:23

have sex that would be trafficking it

04:24

would be the individual that you're

04:26

moving from one place to another or the

04:28

person that you're having them engag in

04:30

sexual conduct in that state or that

04:31

area would be the trafficking it's it's

04:33

a little different than what we

04:34

typically think of just someone putting

04:36

another person in in a vehicle and move

04:38

them to another state it's it's the

04:40

sexual activities that occur in the

04:42

different states As you move them from

04:44

one one place to another that's a good

04:45

point I'm glad you broke that down um I

04:47

want to go to Colin for this so this is

04:49

a really good question from an equally

04:51

amazing name it's cats. adct from uh

04:54

YouTube I'm glad you admitted your

04:56

addiction again first step is admitting

04:58

it um the question is Prince Harry named

05:01

in Diddy's lawsuit true or not now I can

05:03

tell you as far as I know Colin in the

05:06

lawsuit they're referring to the little

05:08

Rod Jones lawsuit this is Diddy's former

05:10

producer accused him of sexual assault

05:12

sexual harassment encourage everybody to

05:14

check out the lawsuit this is actually

05:15

the amended lawsuit right here I know it

05:17

seems like a lot but it's actually

05:19

disturbing read to say the least uh my

05:22

understanding is Harry is just is one of

05:24

the people a celebrity name associated

05:26

with Diddy which by the way if I again

05:29

don't think there's any more mention in

05:30

that but I think the bigger issue is

05:32

when you're dealing with high-profile

05:34

cases like this and we said the same

05:35

thing with the galain Maxwell and the

05:37

release of all those documents you're

05:38

going to hear names doesn't mean they're

05:40

implicated in any way or they're

05:42

criminally responsible in any way it's

05:43

just a connection a celebrity connection

05:46

to Diddy what's your take on it because

05:48

Federal authorities have to be very

05:49

careful and sensitive to who is

05:51

discussed in these kinds of

05:54

Investigations well I think a lot of

05:55

times the they'll put uh names in there

05:59

I mean that that it's truthful I mean

06:00

they have to swear to the affidavit but

06:02

make it even more salacious to get more

06:04

attention I it's unlikely Prince Harry

06:07

had anything to do with this uh he was

06:09

just it's from what I understand uh from

06:11

my the news reports he just attended a

06:13

party and he was just listed in lawsuit

06:15

as just one of the attendees but there

06:17

was absolutely no uh no inclination or

06:21

no accusation against him or anybody

06:24

that's in his Circle I will tell you if

06:27

it comes out that Diddy or anybody in

06:28

his inner circle are ultimately charged

06:30

with the worst of crimes that we're

06:31

talking about here you know sex

06:33

trafficking charges then it goes into a

06:35

conversation like we had with the

06:36

Weinstein case or even the Epstein case

06:39

was this just known and never discussed

06:42

was this just known and nobody came

06:43

forward those are going to be some tough

06:45

questions but we're not at that point

06:47

yet but Brian I go to you now because

06:48

this is actually two questions that I

06:50

think are equally important one is from

06:52

D from YouTube well first let me do this

06:54

one this is the expat exchange from

06:57

YouTube based on the information known

06:59

What charges is Diddy likely to be hit

07:02

with Rico and then I'll also throw this

07:04

one for me this is D from YouTube what's

07:07

the sentence if charged and found guilty

07:10

so let me put it this way we don't know

07:13

anything about the investigation in this

07:15

case we know that it's it's sex

07:16

trafficking and we are connecting the

07:18

dots as best as we can and looking at

07:21

the Civil uh complaints from the five

07:23

different people one being Cassandra

07:25

Ventura her name also is is Cassie that

07:27

one settled so we look at the other four

07:29

so if I was a betting person looking at

07:31

those civil complaints I'm saying that

07:34

I'm looking at Rodney Jones's and we're

07:35

talking Rico because he alleges Rico

07:37

charges in his civil complaint as well

07:40

as the human and sex trafficking uh

07:42

Federal charge that one uh if I'm

07:45

correct I'm going to double check it I

07:46

think it's 18 USC

07:48

1591 that has an ultimate sentence of up

07:51

to 25 years in prison now the other

07:53

thing you have to think about is if

07:54

you're believing the allegations of

07:56

Rodney Jones to be true and there are

07:58

multiple allegations of traffic tring

08:00

there's a potential for multiple charges

08:01

of trafficking so it could be one charge

08:04

of human trafficking which is 25 years

08:06

or it could be multiple that are

08:08

sentenced consecutively so right now

08:10

it's speculation but you'll look to the

08:11

Civil complaints and that's you and I'm

08:13

glad let's also make it clear these are

08:15

civil complaints these are accusations

08:17

that make up a civil lawsuit having said

08:20

that you could have behavior that is

08:22

overlaps right have Behavior that's

08:24

civil but also part of the criminal

08:25

Arena but these are civil allegations

08:28

well the the complaint is civil correct

08:30

but what they are accusing in the

08:32

conduct and even in the Civil complaint

08:34

they are criminal statutes corre yes and

08:36

so you can take as we've seen and I'm

08:38

not drawing the comparison to say that

08:40

Shan comes is like these people I'm just

08:42

saying that the process is similar right

08:44

you can draw comparisons between Harvey

08:45

Weinstein who had civil cases that

08:47

turned criminal R Kelly Jeffrey Epstein

08:50

you can have civil claims that have

08:52

criminal bases that someone can

08:53

investigate and move forward on so uh

08:56

Colin let me move it over to you we have

08:58

Danny Q from YouTube uh what determines

09:01

if this case is federal or state Rico I

09:04

mean we know it seems to be a federal

09:06

investigation uh Homeland Security as we

09:08

talked about was a part of it so how do

09:10

we know or what makes it something

09:11

Federal versus

09:13

State well uh obviously the HSI went

09:17

ahead and did the raids and the the

09:19

concept of Rico gets thrown around a lot

09:21

it doesn't get charged very often

09:22

because there's a very high bar to prove

09:25

Rico and basically a Rico is an

09:27

Enterprise of two or more people that

09:29

are engag Eng in specified unlawful Acts

09:31

or criminal activity that's been

09:32

identified in the statute as and and and

09:35

obviously human trafficking is

09:37

identified there so what he's going to

09:39

be charged with if at all because he is

09:41

innocent till proven guilty we don't

09:43

know I mean that was the purpose of that

09:45

search warrant is HSI going in there

09:47

Gathering all the evidence and I'm sure

09:49

they're out doing lots and lots of

09:50

interviews and then if there is indeed

09:52

victims ATT attached to this uh as in

09:55

people that were human trafficked

09:56

they're going to be talking to all them

09:58

and wrapping this up and then I think

10:00

this will come to a head quite quickly

10:02

because of all of the media tension

10:04

that's swirling around let me ask you my

10:06

own question about that Colin a lot of

10:08

people have been wondering why were

10:10

charges not in conjunction with the raid

10:13

why did an indictment arrest happen in

10:16

conjunction with the raid if you can

10:18

explain

10:19

that well it might be because they're

10:21

relying on those complaints that are in

10:23

those civil lawsuits as well as some

10:25

other uh issues or things that determine

10:27

probable cause so so the bottom line is

10:30

that the US attorney's office especially

10:32

in Los Angeles is not going to charge

10:34

someday unless they feel confident

10:37

that're they're going they have uh

10:39

evidence Beyond A Reasonable Doubt so I

10:42

think the bottom line here is the uh

10:44

investigators want to gather everything

10:46

the prosecutors that are associated with

10:48

this they don't want to pull the trigger

10:49

too soon because they want to make sure

10:51

they get this right the first time

10:52

because you only get one chance

10:54

otherwise if you go too quickly uh they

10:57

might have to dismiss counts or not

10:59

arrest him at all uh Brian want to turn

11:02

this next question over to you by the

11:03

way you can get your questions in on

11:05

Facebook YouTube X Twitter get them any

11:09

which way you can all right so let's go

11:11

to this question this is from JT baller

11:13

3 from YouTube do we get access to all

11:16

the information presented in federal

11:18

cases or not I know there's no video

11:20

interesting because let's say an

11:21

indictment were to come out today or

11:23

tomorrow um what would be our level what

11:26

would our access be to those documents

11:28

what would we know well if the stny is

11:30

running an investigation in coordination

11:33

the southern district of New York is

11:34

running investigation in coordination

11:36

with Miami as well as uh Los Angeles

11:39

typically what they do when they do have

11:40

an indictment they post on their social

11:42

media specifically X or their own

11:44

website and they'll put out uh a blurb

11:46

of what the allegations are and what

11:48

they're charging this is me looking in

11:50

it in the future if Sean Colmes is

11:52

indicted so you might get that blurb in

11:53

some information we may also get an

11:56

indictment but if that information is

11:58

not presented to

12:59

reporting that that wasn't his Gulf

13:00

Stream and there's reporting that he

13:02

flew out of the country and then there's

13:04

reporting that he's in uh Miami right

13:06

now so it's really at that early stage

13:10

where everybody's making assumptions and

13:12

uh kind of uh kind of trying to fill in

13:14

the blanks um this is going to shake out

13:17

very very quickly and uh frankly

13:19

somebody of the stature of Mr Colmes I

13:23

mean it's it would be tough for him to

13:25

to hide anywhere in the world if if he

13:27

indeed wants to hide well

13:29

if he also goes to a country that

13:31

doesn't have extradition I'm sure that

13:33

would obviously complicate situations

13:35

although I want to now ask you Colin

13:37

followup question about the raid itself

13:39

received a lot of controversy I would

13:41

say Obviously from Diddy's legal team

13:44

they say that this was like a military

13:45

effort it was excessive we have a

13:48

question from wheelie Pete from YouTube

13:51

should his homes have been allowed to be

13:52

raided given that they were in his

13:54

daughter's name and the name of the

13:56

record company now again I I can't

13:58

confirm if that that ownership is

14:00

correct but assuming it is even so you

14:02

talk about the the what was used there

14:05

um you know we had armed Personnel

14:07

coming in people were placed in

14:09

handcuffs outside quite the presence

14:12

walk us through if you think it was

14:14

appropriate well just unpack that

14:17

question a little bit the first thing is

14:18

using a SWAT team is what they use there

14:21

uh might even been bork with the which

14:23

is the border patrol their tactical

14:26

Group which is phenomenal group The

14:29

bottom line is they were going to go

14:30

through probably a checklist of reasons

14:32

why they would use a tactical response

14:35

and the number one reason they would is

14:37

they may have gotten information that

14:39

there's firearms in the house and if

14:42

that's the case they want to certainly

14:44

uh use whatever resources they they have

14:46

to make sure everybody is safe also

14:48

based upon the size of that uh estate y

14:51

uh that by the time the officers got to

14:53

the front door everybody would have

14:55

known what what their purpose was so

14:58

using the those tactical resources was

15:00

absolutely I think appropriate because

15:04

they were concerned about not only their

15:05

own safety but the safety of the people

15:07

there and they want to do it in the

15:08

safest manner the second thing as far as

15:11

uh raing a house that's in somebody

15:13

else's name it doesn't matter whose name

15:15

it is uh the warrant's going to say or

15:17

the affid davit is going to say that

15:18

there's alleged or probable cause of

15:21

criminal activity or there's um uh

15:24

indicia of criminal activity is there

15:26

and that's what guides those warrants

15:29

and and I'm glad you mentioned that

15:30

because again going back to those

15:32

lawsuits if you just read it there and

15:34

you take everything is true there are

15:36

alligations of firearms possessions

15:39

there are at least two shootings that

15:40

are mentioned in the little Rod Jones

15:42

lawsuit implicating Diddy so of course

15:44

we are going to be following that all

15:46

right we have a question here Brian uh

15:48

this is from K mam from YouTube what

15:51

legally needed to happen to allow this

15:53

raid before an actual arrest do we know

15:56

the probable cause the civil suits

16:00

so you're they're kind of answering the

16:01

question there it's probable cause do we

16:03

know what the probable cause is no at

16:05

best I can tell you the level of

16:07

information that law enforcement needs

16:09

in order to kind of jump into someone's

16:11

home and start searching it so it's

16:13

probable cause which in lame person's

16:15

term I always describe it as the level

16:17

of information that a reasonable officer

16:19

would need to suggest that a crime did

16:21

is or will occur now you need some

16:24

specificities as to that nature of the

16:25

crime you could probably look to the

16:26

civil lawsuits for that whether it be

16:29

assault or sex trafficking specifically

16:31

probably the video evidence that Rodney

16:33

Jones says he not only has but says that

16:35

sha Colmes also has because he has

16:37

cameras and recordings inside the home

16:40

and so if Rodney Jones is able to sit

16:42

down and have a conversation from the

16:43

time that he filed that lawsuit back in

16:45

February of this year till now he might

16:47

be able to give law enforcement enough

16:49

information to say you know what of all

16:50

of Shan col's homes we believe that

16:52

Miami and La have the information we're

16:55

going to seek for let's go convince a

16:56

judge of that let's get those warrants

16:58

let's coordinate and let's move in I was

17:00

speaking to a former CIA and FBI agent

17:03

Tracy Walder who was of the opinion that

17:05

this raid happened at that time to

17:07

preserve evidence there could have been

17:09

an issue about whether evidence was

17:11

going to be discarded in any way we

17:13

don't know having said that uh you know

17:15

Brian really hit it on the head that if

17:17

you read this lawsuit from a former

17:19

producer of Shan comes it suggests that

17:23

he had cameras in all of the homes of in

17:25

the different homes that he had and it

17:28

was

18:29

was doing this was was got to a level of

18:31

comfort and so the fact that they were

18:34

raiding these homes it's because they

18:37

the law enforcement thinks that's where

18:39

the evidence is going to be located let

18:41

me just follow up with you Colin because

18:43

we have another question from Queen

18:44

Chrissy from YouTube did sha Colmes know

18:47

he would be raided the night

18:51

before unlikely yeah I don't think so I

18:55

I think he felt you know he probably had

18:57

a sense that he's in a lot of trouble

18:58

based upon those uh civil lawsuits

19:01

because he's got the resources to hire

19:03

very good attorneys who said the things

19:05

that are in these lawsuits are very very

19:08

very serious but for him to know exactly

19:11

when they were going to do this raid is

19:13

is highly unlikely all right Brian let

19:16

me turn over to you this is a really

19:18

really good question um so as we said

19:20

these civil lawsuits happen um it was

19:22

strange for me because I was actually

19:24

reporting on this about three four weeks

19:26

ago before Diddy's name was in the news

19:28

so much I was reading these lawsuits I

19:30

said this is they're alleging criminal

19:31

conduct I wonder if criminal charges

19:33

will happen now we see these raids one

19:36

of the things that was really

19:37

interesting one of the first lawsuits

19:38

was Cassie ventur and she ended up

19:41

alleging horrible things against Diddy

19:44

and other individuals rape um you know

19:47

their gun

19:48

possession I mean the she these these

19:51

illicit sexual acts that were very

19:53

difficult to even describe she settles

19:54

with him the day after and then we see

19:56

multiple lawsuits that happen the reason

19:58

I ask you this because Danny from

20:00

YouTube says was it a mistake for Diddy

20:03

to settle the Cassie

20:05

lawsuit good question right yeah I mean

20:08

hindsight is 2020 I bet you that Sean

20:10

comes is probably somewhere pacing right

20:12

now thinking the same thing um there's a

20:15

theory out there that that you could

20:18

suggest that settling one lawsuit

20:20

invited others to have other lawsuits

20:23

because they thought they could get

20:24

their payday so to speak and it was the

20:26

culmination of all these lawsuits that

20:28

led to a criminal investigation and

20:30

under that theory which is a very

20:31

reasonable one I I can't tell you that

20:33

it's true or not because I don't have

20:34

the facts to support it uh yeah I would

20:37

say it's a bad idea but on the flip side

20:40

if Sean Colmes didn't settle that first

20:43

case the discovery process would have

20:46

been horrendous you have to sit for

20:48

depositions people get to question you

20:51

uh people get to question the other

20:52

Witnesses potential Witnesses get to get

20:54

called you have attorneys like myself

20:55

who have what's called subpoena power so

20:56

we get to call other people to come and

20:59

testify so damned if you do damned if

21:01

you don't this might have been the

21:03

smarter choice but I think both were

21:05

were difficult choices to make and he I

21:08

know he made public comments afterwards

21:10

uh well I should say written comments

21:11

afterwards but basically said this is

21:13

like a money grab the floodgates are

21:15

open something to that effect um and

21:17

clearly the statement released uh by his

21:19

attorney yesterday is very consistent

21:21

with this this idea of this is Witch

21:23

Hunt that this is um you know he's

21:25

innocent of all the charges he hasn't

21:26

done anything wrong um Colin go back to

21:28

you got a question from and I hopefully

21:31

I'm not butchering the Stewie T from

21:33

YouTube It's Stewie

21:35

St so interesting maybe Stewie Stewie T

21:38

from YouTube surely if they raided his

21:41

homes he should be arrested and

21:45

questioned not necessarily uh they're

21:48

going to rely on the the evidence the

21:50

facts of the crime and they're going to

21:51

follow their own process so it's one of

21:54

those things we're going to have to see

21:55

where this goes and I've done warrants

21:57

where I have arrested the the target of

22:00

the warrant for many months even even a

22:03

year later just based upon the fact that

22:05

I was gathering evidence people got to

22:07

remember search warrant is an Evidence

22:08

Gathering tool it's not an arrest

22:10

warrant so this is part of the process

22:12

and it may take some time before they uh

22:16

they go to the next level if indeed Mr

22:18

Colmes is guilty of any of these things

22:20

people are accusing him of let's talk

22:22

about the next level this is a really

22:23

good question we have great questions

22:25

from our viewers this is uh for Brian

22:27

this is Taylor from YouTube would they

22:30

need to go to a grand jury for an

22:32

indictment uh this would be

22:35

feds yes for an indictment but you can

22:38

also have a special indictment or like

22:39

an information that's presented just to

22:41

the judge I would expect though in a

22:43

case like this yes but of course a grand

22:45

jury is a secret process we won't know

22:47

uh what type of grand jury there's

22:49

special Grand jurries that collect

22:50

information there are Grand jurries that

22:52

return indictments uh we don't know if

22:54

they're going to go through one or the

22:56

other or both uh but if you're looking

22:57

for an indictment yes the most common

22:59

form uh or process of doing that is

23:01

through a grand jury so Colin this is

23:03

another good question this almost sets

23:06

up what I would say I don't know if it's

23:08

a defense but I think this question is

23:10

wondering if it could be a defense Shan

23:12

Caesar from YouTube is it trafficking

23:15

meaning is it sex trafficking when the

23:17

participants travel

23:21

willingly as my understanding of the man

23:24

act uh that it is it's very uh

23:28

straightforward that if they are

23:30

transferred for the purpose of of sexual

23:34

purpose that it still meets the elements

23:37

of the law and because the per the

23:41

theory behind the law is are they able

23:44

to uh give consent to tra to travel in

23:48

that uh in that circumstance because of

23:51

they may be under some sort of uh

23:52

intimidation or maybe uh you know held

23:55

against their will we just don't know

23:58

but to say they they consented to go

24:02

across state lines for this purpose uh

24:05

you'd have to talk to the victims to

24:06

figure out what the real story is or if

24:08

they're minors and they wouldn't be able

24:10

to consent Brian what do you think yeah

24:12

I'm gonna piggyback of what Colin is

24:13

saying as well it think of it this way

24:15

it's less about the the the travel more

24:18

about the destination and so if you

24:20

consent to Flying to to La uh but you

24:24

know that the destination you're going

24:25

to have UNC consensual sex that would be

24:28

a violation of the man act or of human

24:30

trafficking it's not necessarily the

24:32

reason for traveling but the reason for

24:33

the destination I think is the easiest

24:35

way to say it I think colum was was

24:36

saying that as well and and talking

24:38

about these um so the allegation that

24:42

you have these people Brian that signed

24:44

ndas non-disclosure agreements right um

24:47

this is Johnny Infidel from YouTube

24:50

whether it was ndas they settled the

24:52

lawsuit uh do NDA victims uh may have

24:55

signed with Diddy still hold or do ndas

24:58

go the window once a criminal

24:59

investigation has been started in other

25:01

words can they cooperate yeah

25:04

so yes as the kind of the second part of

25:06

your question I'll put it easier this

25:08

way you can't NDA criminal acts I can't

25:10

walk up and punch Jesse Weber in the

25:12

face and be like sign this NDA and don't

25:14

tell anyone I assaulted you uh that's

25:16

not necessarily the way that that it

25:17

works another component to that as well

25:19

is if you look at the Ronnie Jones

25:21

lawsuit part of his NDA is that he

25:23

wasn't paid appropriately so NDA is a

25:25

quidd pro quo I won't speak if you pay

25:28

up properly and so Ronnie Jones would

25:30

say my NDA is not even legit so it's a

25:33

contract there has to be an agreement

25:35

yeah yeah um okay col let me go to you

25:37

this this is from Nikki Hayes from

25:38

YouTube will all of the footage of the

25:41

security cameras he has be taken as part

25:43

of the raid interesting question because

25:45

we talked about earlier one of the

25:47

allegations put forward by Rodney Jones

25:49

is that on that camera footage at

25:51

Diddy's properties is evidence of

25:54

illicit sexual activity or or even or

25:56

even just blackmail uh some some videos

25:59

that may tend to show some of these

26:02

relationships that are being alleged uh

26:04

by Jones so again the question is will

26:06

all the footage of the security cameras

26:08

be

26:09

taken absolutely and HSI most likely

26:12

brought in experts in uh digital

26:14

forensics that uh will know how to get

26:17

to those uh videos that are stored on

26:19

DVRs or computers or some sort of

26:22

digital devices and they are going to

26:25

take everything digitally that they can

26:28

get their hands on all right so here's

26:30

what we're going to do we're going to

26:31

take more of your questions again submit

26:33

them on Facebook submit them on YouTube

26:36

submit them on X Twitter still can't

26:38

submit them any which way you can we'll

26:40

bring them up on the air again any

26:41

question you might have about this sha

26:44

didy com's situation I have a question

26:46

somebody asked me a question it's very

26:47

nice always Overland from YouTube

26:50

question for Jesse is the timing of this

26:52

a distraction for something else that is

26:54

happening why now I was betting man that

26:57

sounds like a political question um I'm

27:01

not going to say uh that why you might

27:03

be saying this no I I don't believe that

27:05

this is quite a distraction from

27:07

something else I think the timing of it

27:09

is interesting in light of these

27:10

different lawsuits that have come

27:12

forward and different information that

27:14

has been presented uh to law enforcement

27:16

and as we've talked about before the

27:17

timing of the Reign suggest that perhaps

27:20

they had feelings that some of this

27:22

evidence needed to be preserved perhaps

27:24

some of it was going to be lost it's

27:26

always strategic when these raids occur

27:29

but no to say the least I don't think

27:30

that this is a distraction from

27:33

something else that might be happening

27:35

all right let's go to ah this is a good

27:38

question for it's actually a good

27:39

question for either of you but I'll go

27:41

to Brian uh Derpy cow from YouTube How

27:44

long does it normally take to issue an

27:46

arrest warrant after a raid assuming

27:48

there is sufficient evidence well Derby

27:50

Cal uh it depends on the sufficiency as

27:53

well as the quality of the evidence and

27:54

as well as the the bread of the

27:57

investigation and the charges uh going

27:59

against a person it it could be days it

28:02

could be months it could be a year uh I

28:06

don't know what's on the electronics

28:07

that were recovered I don't know I know

28:09

there was some reporting that guns were

28:11

found in both locations I don't know if

28:13

those guns are attached to other crimes

28:14

or whether they were uh legally

28:16

purchased and and and maintained and so

28:18

for that I can't really gauge what I

28:21

would say is law enforce moves quickly

28:23

they seem to have enough people that

28:25

they could question being the five

28:27

people who had lawsuits and if you want

28:29

any gauge I'll pull this out of thin air

28:31

uh think about the last time you saw

28:33

something like this with keii d July of

28:35

last year I think was July 20th uh his

28:38

his place is raid and then some two

28:40

months later in September he's arrested

28:43

and so that could be a metric you want

28:44

to use but again it depends on the

28:46

quantity and quality of evidence so

28:47

Brian let me stick with you for a second

28:49

talking about the timing of when we

28:51

could see a charge because you and I

28:52

were talking during the break um about

28:54

what might have been found at the

28:56

residence the reason I say this is

28:57

because XX toxic God XX from YouTube uh

29:01

law crime Network did they find anything

29:03

in Diddy's homes and if so will it be

29:06

used against him walk us through if they

29:08

found anything where might see charges

29:10

sooner rather than later so at least in

29:12

the reporting I know they say they'

29:13

found Electronics now the question is

29:15

what are on the those electronics are we

29:17

talking about Sean combes and his family

29:19

celebrating a birthday or are we talking

29:20

about some of those Freaknik parties uh

29:23

that Shan Colmes have been famous for

29:24

those white parties where the there are

29:26

illicit and illegal conduct in them are

29:29

you able to identify those individuals

29:31

in them are you able to contact those

29:33

alleged victims to see whether or not

29:35

those actions were consensual because

29:37

just because you see video recordings of

29:39

people having sex it doesn't mean unless

29:41

one of them is a minor that that

29:43

activity is a legal you would have to

29:45

find those people to see whether or not

29:47

it was consensual are they going to

29:49

testify are they going to speak with you

29:50

this is another reason why this case

29:51

could be delayed and so when you go

29:53

through all those potential questions

29:55

the evidence may be very strong if you

29:57

can cooperate with Witnesses or it could

29:58

be absolutely nothing if no one else

30:00

comes forward and you can't give full

30:02

breath to the evidence that You'

30:03

collected these are great questions I

30:05

mean honestly fantastic questions keep

30:07

them coming on YouTube Facebook X

30:08

Twitter keep them coming we'll answer

30:10

them right now you got a retired FBI

30:12

agent you got a brilliant legal mind got

30:14

the guy in the middle who was not

30:16

dressed for the occasion so you know

30:18

let's uh let's do it um I got another

30:19

question uh for you Colin this is

30:22

another question from Shan Caesar if

30:24

excessive force was justified during the

30:27

raid due to security reasons why were

30:29

civilians within

30:31

proximity well it's kind of a loaded

30:33

question to say excessive I mean I think

30:36

the based upon the fact that they found

30:38

Firearms there I think the force was

30:40

justified and not excessive and then

30:43

secondly in terms of civilians walking

30:45

by we don't know the the circumstances

30:47

or when they came by uh it looks like

30:50

they had a perimeter and they were all

30:51

kind of offset and they weren't in the

30:53

middle of any of the law enforcement

30:55

actions so I don't think anybody was any

30:58

any danger per se on the street and

31:01

using that level of force I think that

31:04

they may have made it actually a safer

31:06

situation for everybody involved okay

31:09

this this is interesting we've talked so

31:11

much about wow they wouldn't do this

31:12

unless they had some they must have

31:14

found something in the house charges are

31:16

imminent ran Chris from YouTube says

31:19

what if they find no further Evidence as

31:21

part of this raid hypothetically

31:22

speaking Yeah it it happens I mean I've

31:25

had clients who have been targets of of

31:27

search warrants and they go in there and

31:29

they and they don't find something their

31:31

Ci or confidential informance Niche

31:33

whatever you want to call them might

31:34

give them bad information a civil

31:36

lawsuit may be just what Sean K is

31:38

saying a Witch Hunt and there's nothing

31:39

to corroborate it and if nothing is

31:41

found then I would hope and I would

31:44

expect the sdny to come out and say you

31:46

know what we have exhausted all options

31:49

we've spoken to whoever we can we've

31:51

we've done our search for it we maybe

31:52

done subsequent search warrants but we

31:54

don't have anything and therefore we

31:55

will not be pursuing charges do you

31:57

think he could if that was the case

31:58

obviously this is not good for his

32:00

reputation this has damaged him publicly

32:03

for people who were not following

32:05

lawsuits like we were um who maybe were

32:07

not following the In-N-Out of Diddy's

32:09

allegations over the years do would he

32:11

have a uh Brian would he have some sort

32:13

of legal action against the government

32:15

not the government because the

32:17

government can only follow the

32:19

allegations that an individual gives

32:21

them and so you don't want to get into a

32:23

place where if I lie to the government

32:26

and I say keep using Jesse I'm going to

32:28

pick on Colin now Colin said that I

32:30

assaulted him right I want my law

32:33

enforcement to believe victims to an

32:35

extent to investigate and get that

32:37

information to see whether or not it's

32:38

corroborated now if law enforcement does

32:40

all of the steps they're supposed to do

32:41

and they find out that Colin uh lied to

32:44

them that you know what I don't have a

32:45

beef with law enforcement they did their

32:47

job I have a beef with Colin and so I

32:49

don't think the government will be on

32:50

the hook but it'll be the source of

32:51

information who made that lie very if

32:54

they if they find out who the who the

32:56

sources were who the informant were I'm

32:58

not coming for you boys Colin's I got

33:01

I'm not gonna lie to you Colin's a

33:02

little scary he's dressed in all black

33:04

we I can't get any emotion from this guy

33:06

I'm freaked out but I like him I like

33:08

him Colin let me go to you Jamie W

33:10

Martin Martinez from YouTube do you feel

33:12

that celebrities that engaged in these

33:14

activities will also be pursued or do

33:16

you think they will stop at

33:19

Diddy well another loaded question we

33:22

don't know who engaged in what uh we

33:25

just have lots of allegations that

33:26

haven't been uh

33:28

thoroughly vetted or investigated if

33:31

there are celebrities per se that were

33:33

involved in activities especially with

33:36

minors there's a very high probability

33:39

that the federal government is going to

33:41

uh pursue them as well however it's from

33:45

what I the reporting is that a lot of

33:47

this may have been an extortion issue so

33:51

there's going to be a lot of if that is

33:53

true there's going to be a lot of

33:54

embarrassing things out there so the

33:56

southern district New York is very very

33:59

careful about not embarrassing somebody

34:02

if if it's not going to move their case

34:04

forward and so that to kind of e echo on

34:08

what's been said here is we just have to

34:10

wait till see all the chips fall but

34:13

here's a here's a a kind of a related

34:16

question to you Brian um I mentioned it

34:19

before if these allegations are true and

34:21

he is

34:22

charged that's the same conversation

34:25

that we had with Jeffrey Epstein with

34:26

Harvey Weinstein was this just a known

34:28

secret the reason I asked that is

34:30

because Tabitha Rose Freeman from

34:31

YouTube asks are the people who worked

34:33

for Diddy and were well aware of what

34:35

was happening liable liable even if they

34:39

didn't participate again assuming that

34:41

there was some criminal activity

34:43

happening yeah again based on the

34:44

assumption that there were criminal

34:46

criminal activity going on I would say

34:48

look no far further than Ronney Jones's

34:51

own lawsuit who says that Shan Colmes is

34:55

uh I think it's his manager or or or

34:57

something of that effect the person who

34:58

kind of runs his calendar so to speak

35:01

that they analogize her to the gain

35:03

Maxwell let me so her name Christina

35:06

Corum combes as Chief of Staff compared

35:08

to the glain Maxwell again the former

35:11

associate or Madam of Epstein um one of

35:14

the examples is for instance when Jones

35:15

went to corm to report combes she

35:18

allegedly said you know Shawn will be

35:20

Shawn yeah and Chris and think of that

35:22

Christina corm is one of the named

35:24

defendants in both the original and the

35:26

amended complaint for Rodney uh for

35:29

Rodney Jones so to that point yes I mean

35:33

look what happened to the criminal uh

35:34

case against Jeffrey Epstein before he

35:37

uh ultimately lost his life and then

35:39

also Gan Maxwell prosecuted afterwards

35:41

so you don't necessarily have to be the

35:43

individual participating directly in the

35:45

sexual assault but if you are organizing

35:47

the sexual assault and providing the

35:49

resources to allow for it to happen yeah

35:52

you can be found criminally liable got

35:54

another question for you Colin this is

35:56

from Danny from YouTube uh um how long

35:59

does it take for the feds to coordinate

36:01

two raids like this two separate

36:03

jurisdictions two different

36:06

coasts well uh I can speak from the

36:09

perspective of the FBI uh they can move

36:12

very quickly um they're already set up

36:14

they already have teams in place that

36:16

that are doing other things and a a case

36:19

like this it probably took maybe a

36:21

couple of days based upon the uh the

36:24

sense of urgency phone calls were made

36:26

plans were put together together and HSI

36:29

got got it together and went out and and

36:31

took care of business so to answer the

36:33

question it does not take very long to

36:35

do something like this Brian over to you

36:38

uh really good question about this

36:40

something that I mentioned before about

36:42

the allegation put forward by Rodney

36:43

Jones that didd he has cameras in all of

36:46

his properties videotaping everything

36:47

that's going on the question from Ram

36:50

from YouTube what if certain celebrities

36:52

being videotaped without their

36:53

permission consent what could happen

36:56

then I think it would depend uh from a

36:59

state-by-state issue because some states

37:01

like New York you don't need to have

37:02

consent to videotape another individual

37:05

I don't and I'm sorry I should have

37:06

prepared for this uh I don't have a list

37:09

of all states where you need the

37:11

permission to record someone else um but

37:14

if it's in a state where you don't then

37:17

there shouldn't be an issue if it is in

37:19

a state where you you need the consent

37:21

of another individual to record them

37:23

that may be an issue in so far of them

37:26

not doing criminal Acts I don't believe

37:28

that privacy extends to Illegal conduct

37:31

there might be a caveat to that I don't

37:33

think you could say you know what yeah

37:35

sure I was having sex with this minor

37:36

but you shouldn't have been recording me

37:39

during this and even if that is true

37:41

that only deals with the video recording

37:43

it doesn't mean that the minor can't be

37:45

found using that video and then testify

37:47

against them so it's one Avenue locked

37:49

down but another one could possibly open

37:51

for criminality I think we got our this

37:53

might be our first Super Chat of the day

37:55

uh from Paulie 777 seven uh this one I'm

37:58

going to go through uh by the way super

38:00

chats are the best way to get your uh

38:02

your question up to the top so we can

38:04

see it first and we'll get to it before

38:05

anything else but Paulie 7777 says how

38:10

difficult is it to get him back to the

38:12

United States again assuming he is not

38:14

in the United States assuming he is

38:16

criminally charged how tough is it to

38:18

get him back here to be criminally

38:21

prosecuted Colin oh okay so well it

38:25

depends on where he's at if he's in a

38:27

place that there's no

38:28

extradition uh there was Rowan palansky

38:31

that case where he I think he was in

38:33

France for over 30 years and never came

38:37

back to face uh justice so or if he's in

38:41

an extraditable uh country for example

38:44

the United United Kingdom um it could

38:46

happen fairly quickly based upon his uh

38:49

notoriety and the resources that the

38:51

Department of Justice would put towards

38:53

us you know what let me stick with you

38:55

Colin for a second assuming this is all

38:58

true Pepe from YouTube says how did he

39:01

get away with so many alleged assault

39:03

charges in the last two decades so in

39:05

other words if he was engaging in Crim

39:08

in crimes for years why was he not

39:12

properly investigated or arrested

39:13

beforehand and obviously we still don't

39:15

have a lot of information these are

39:17

allegations in a civil law so we don't

39:18

know what the context of this

39:20

investigation is but it is a fair

39:23

question well speculating you know there

39:25

may have been a culture of

39:28

of intimidation to keep people quiet um

39:31

he's a very powerful person in the

39:33

entertainment industry uh he's got a lot

39:35

of powerful friends if any of this is

39:38

true we don't know it's true there may

39:40

have been quite a bit of intimidation uh

39:43

for people to stay quiet or to play ball

39:45

or they were involved in the acts as

39:47

well um the same question could be posed

39:50

to the Harvey Weinstein issue because

39:52

that went on for for several decades as

39:54

well yeah that's uh that's why I keep

39:57

saying he is charged those questions are

39:59

going to resurface about it was this

40:00

just a known secret why did nothing

40:02

happen sooner we're not at that point

40:04

yet uh again he hasn't been criminally

40:06

charged and nobody in his Camp has been

40:08

criminally charged in connection with

40:10

this sex trafficking human trafficking

40:12

investigation uh Brian go to you we have

40:14

a question from Eiser 8 from YouTube If

40:17

the individual flew someone from one

40:20

jurisdiction where the person was not of

40:22

age and the suspect flew them to a

40:24

jurisdiction where they would now be

40:26

considered legal would that be sex

40:31

trafficking welcome to the bar exam uh

40:33

this is your first question this is

40:35

definitely like a bar exam question so I

40:36

think I think you you make the

40:38

distinction between consent in one area

40:40

and consent in another first of all

40:41

consent and legal age are two different

40:43

things some states have consent at a

40:45

lower age um than others so I see what

40:47

you're saying but it would depend on

40:51

when they landed um whether or not that

40:53

sex was consensual based on I guess that

40:56

age but if you're doing it for the

40:58

purpose of evading I think that might be

41:01

an issue in of itself I I don't think

41:03

the federal government wants you to be

41:05

like you know what I think the state

41:07

next to me will allow me to have sex

41:09

with a 16-year-old so I'm just going to

41:10

transport them over state lines I think

41:12

that still may run a foul with sex

41:15

trafficking as well as

41:18

um the man act because the purpose in

41:20

which you're traveling you're trying to

41:22

you're basically trying to find a

41:22

loophole in the law right um this is a

41:25

good question about privacy and

41:27

sensitivity I'm going to throw it to you

41:28

Colin because if there is an indictment

41:30

that comes down um I think it's going to

41:32

be very interesting to know who was a

41:35

victim who was victimized here because

41:36

Teresa super from YouTube says have

41:39

those that have been trafficked been

41:41

identified again assuming that there

41:42

really is a crime of trafficking but

41:45

have those that been trafficked been

41:46

identified are there any missing persons

41:49

that will be reunited with

41:53

family well once again it's an

41:55

investigation uh there is a lot of

41:57

moving Parts here there's a high

42:00

probability that HSI already has some

42:02

victims that they've interviewed but the

42:04

big purpose of that search warrant is to

42:06

determine if there's more victims out

42:08

there or if there's any of these victims

42:10

that are being held against their will

42:12

and some other property because the

42:14

number one purpose of the these kind of

42:17

activities or enforcement actions is to

42:19

see if we can confine victims and bring

42:22

them to safety I got a question uh Super

42:25

Chat from Samantha Ng

42:28

uh thank you so much for putting the

42:29

Super Chat in Jesse do you think Diddy

42:32

fled if so where do you think he'd go PS

42:34

I love your hair and you're awesome

42:37

well thank you it's glad I was able to

42:40

submit that under my pseudonym um no

42:42

really thank you so much Samantha so do

42:44

I think did he fled no I I don't think

42:46

that he fled um there was something

42:48

about the statement that was issued by

42:49

his attorney uh that leads me to believe

42:52

that he might still be in the country um

42:55

I I don't have any reason to believe

42:57

that he escaped uh or I even shouldn't

42:59

say Escape that he fled that he's not

43:01

here um obviously there was this video

43:03

of him circulating in an airport but I

43:05

have no reason to believe that he's

43:06

outside of the country but I'll tell you

43:07

this much we just don't know that's the

43:09

bottom line we do not know at this point

43:11

thank you so much for the compliment

43:13

very sweet all right let's keep going on

43:15

um all right this is I'm gonna go back

43:17

to you Brian it's a question that was

43:18

asked earlier but I think it's important

43:20

to repeat uh Johnny Infidel from YouTube

43:23

asks do NDA victims may have signed with

43:25

did he still hold or do go out the

43:27

window once a criminal investigation has

43:29

been started yeah for the record that

43:31

last question was real I had to go to

43:32

our slack channel to be like is this

43:34

Jesse sending himself questions no that

43:36

was a real question Jesse's got fans but

43:38

we'll go back to that actual question

43:39

you got from me Jesse and yes they kind

43:42

of go out the window you can't the easy

43:43

answer is you can't NDA crimes the other

43:46

issue too is was the NDA fully uh

43:49

executed in the sense of there H it's a

43:51

contract so there has to be something

43:52

for something you don't talk about this

43:55

and I give you that I I know in the

43:57

Rodney Jones case he's saying that he

43:59

was a producer on Shan col's latest

44:01

album that he actually produced nine of

44:03

the of the songs on the love album and

44:05

never got paid the full amount I think

44:07

it was something about $330,000 wasn't

44:09

paid or or something around that that

44:11

number that's why he's asking for such a

44:13

low number in the grand scheme of things

44:15

in this lawsuit for for for payment not

44:18

made so if you don't fulfill your

44:19

requirements to an NDA it doesn't exists

44:21

and if you're NDA in criminal activity

44:23

law enforcement can still come and

44:24

question you about it and you maybe have

44:27

to give that information up because you

44:29

can't NDA crimes it's a great point I

44:31

think everybody should pay attention to

44:32

that one because it does become a

44:34

question in terms of uh what he might

44:36

have allegedly tried to do to cover up

44:38

any of these uh elicit activity again he

44:40

has not been criminally charged he has

44:42

not been officially uh indicted he's not

44:44

been indicted in any way but there are

44:46

these some of these allegations are

44:47

surfacing okay so now let me go to

44:49

another Super Chat uh colum this is one

44:51

this one's for you uh from Travelers of

44:54

the Seas thank you so much for

44:56

submitting a Super Chat and what a

44:58

perfect question to ask from Travelers

45:01

of the Seas hello young men how come

45:04

Diddy's yacht was not raided interesting

45:07

question Allen

45:09

the we don't know that his yacht was not

45:12

raid uh it may have been we just haven't

45:15

we haven't heard or seen the reporting

45:18

um and then this if it hasn't been rated

45:20

it's simply because they didn't have the

45:22

probable cause to uh raid the the yacht

45:25

because HSI has the resources to do as

45:28

many raids as they need that they think

45:31

is is appropriate and needed so once

45:34

again there's a high probability that

45:36

they did search that vessel we just

45:38

don't know about it stick with you Colin

45:40

photo guard 690 from YouTube was he on

45:43

Jeffrey Epstein's Island guest list or

45:45

have a connection to it on a level that

45:47

could be a common connection to the

45:49

allegations brought against him I I

45:52

don't know the answer to that question

45:54

and uh but we will probably get the

45:57

answer to that question very quickly ran

46:00

your tribe from YouTube I'm kind of

46:01

going quickly because we're actually

46:02

running out of time so your tribe from

46:04

YouTube why do you think the FBI raided

46:06

all of his homes and they're not even in

46:07

his name and he left the country the

46:09

same day assuming a lot there are which

46:11

yeah so assuming everything that you're

46:12

saying is true one I don't think those

46:13

are all of Shan col's homes he has more

46:16

than two uh the only thing that I can

46:17

really speculate to and make hezard

46:19

Tales of is in order to get a search

46:20

warrant you can't just say I think Shan

46:23

K has X you have to say I think Shan K

46:26

has X which evidence of a certain crime

46:29

and that would be found in these

46:30

locations there must have been some sort

46:32

of Ci or some sort of informant or some

46:34

sort of witness to say that they have

46:36

locked eyes on some form of evidence

46:38

that exists within those homes that's

46:40

the only thing that makes sense to me

46:41

going to stick with you Brian another

46:43

question from Danny from YouTube uh

46:45

question Diddy son Justin Colmes was

46:47

named in Rod Jones lawsuit what evidence

46:49

would they need for a case against his

46:51

son it would be the same thing against

46:53

Sean Coles whether he participated in

46:55

the human trafficking whether he part

46:57

participated in any sexual assaults or

46:58

whether he was part of an organization

47:00

as Rodney Jones seems to suggest that

47:02

created this Enterprise under a RICO

47:04

statute that funneled sex workers and

47:07

trafficked individuals from one state to

47:09

another affecting interstate commerce

47:10

and that his son uh Justin Dior Holmes

47:13

participated in it and he's also in this

47:15

lawsuit implicated in a shooting as well

47:17

at a record studio and also being part

47:19

uh present at a party where there were

47:21

allegedly underage women okay underage

47:23

girls I should say okay so now um col

47:26

let me go to you uh always Overland on

47:28

YouTube is Diddy's life at risk should

47:31

he be protected if charged or called to

47:35

testify I you know that that's

47:37

speculation I mean he's got a lot of

47:39

resources to pay for private security so

47:42

I with that said he's probably pretty

47:45

safe with the people that are

47:46

surrounding him other than the fact that

47:48

may they may end up being witnesses to

47:50

any of his past Behavior let me stick

47:53

with you let me stick with you we got 30

47:55

seconds Queen Chrissy from YouTube Colin

47:57

how long is the ETA on the review of

47:59

evidence on Sha Colmes and his

48:00

electronic devices that were confiscated

48:02

confiscated during the

48:03

raid depends on how much they took and

48:06

it could be months before they get

48:07

through all that data really fascinating

48:10

stuff gentlemen what a pleasure thank

48:12

you so much for both coming on breaking

48:14

it down for us really interesting um you

48:16

know I think it's fascinating to try to

48:18

get a perspective on this when we don't

48:20

know so much if this advances this goes

48:24

to a place where he's ultimately charged

48:27

I imagine we are going to do another one

48:29

of these so Colin keep your schedule

48:31

open Brian keep your schedule open thank

48:33

you both so much for coming on everybody

48:35

thank you so much for submitting your

48:36

questions to us we really appreciate it

48:38

we do it for you guys and we love having

48:40

this discussion this back and forth with

48:42

you so really do appreciate it continue

48:44

to follow us here at law on crime we're

48:45

over always covering the big cases and

48:47

we will continue to follow the

48:48

developments in the Diddy case I'm Jesse

48:50

Weber see you next time everybody

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas relacionadas
Diddy RaidsLegal AnalysisPublic ReactionRapper ControversyHomeland SecuritySex TraffickingCelebrity LawsuitsInvestigation InsightsMiamiLos Angeles
¿Necesitas un resumen en español?