Trump Found Guilty in New York: Megyn Kelly Gives Her Instant Reaction and Analysis

Megyn Kelly
30 May 202429:41

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses the conviction of former President Donald Trump on 34 counts related to falsified business records. The speaker argues that the trial was rigged and politically motivated, suggesting a broader effort to prevent Trump from running for office again. They predict that the conviction will galvanize Trump's supporters and possibly benefit him electorally, while also raising concerns about the politicization of the justice system and the potential for retaliation against Democratic figures.

Takeaways

  • 😠 The speaker expresses strong disapproval and anger over the conviction of a former president, suggesting that it is politically motivated and a disgrace to the country.
  • 🇺🇸 The conviction is seen as a sign that the United States is no longer upholding its traditional standards of justice, with comparisons to a 'Banana Republic'.
  • 📜 The speaker criticizes the legal process, arguing that the case against the former president was overstretched into 34 counts to make it seem more severe than it should be.
  • 🏦 There is an allegation that the real intention behind the prosecution is to prevent the former president from running for office again, suggesting a political motive.
  • 🤬 The speaker accuses various entities, including Leticia James and Alvin Bragg, of corrupt practices aimed at damaging the former president's business and reputation.
  • 📅 The timing of the cases is questioned, implying that they were brought forth strategically to impact the upcoming presidential election.
  • 👨‍⚖️ The impartiality of the judge and the fairness of the trial are called into question, with claims of a 'rigged' and 'corrupt' process.
  • 🎉 There is a prediction that the conviction will be overturned on appeal, citing potential constitutional violations and the possibility of the case reaching higher courts.
  • 💰 The financial impact of the verdict is mentioned, with the suggestion that it could lead to a surge in donations to the former president's campaign.
  • 🗳️ The final verdict on the situation is said to rest with the American voters in the upcoming election, implying that the legal outcome may not be the end of the story.
  • 🔄 The speaker warns of a potential 'Pandora's Box' being opened, suggesting that the same tactics used against the former president could be used against other political figures in the future.

Q & A

  • What is the main argument presented in the transcript regarding the conviction of a former president?

    -The main argument is that the conviction of the former president on 34 counts is seen as a politically motivated act to prevent him from running for office again, rather than a fair legal judgment.

  • What does the speaker suggest about the nature of the charges against the former president?

    -The speaker suggests that the charges were overcharged and essentially boiled down to one alleged scheme that was artificially stretched into 34 counts.

  • What is the speaker's view on the timing of the cases against the former president?

    -The speaker believes that the timing of the cases is suspicious, implying that they were brought forth strategically to influence the upcoming presidential election.

  • How does the speaker describe the potential consequences of the conviction for the political landscape?

    -The speaker warns that the conviction could set a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to similar 'lawfare' tactics being used against other political figures in the future.

  • What does the speaker suggest about the role of the media in the situation?

    -The speaker implies that the media may play a significant role in shaping public opinion by repeatedly emphasizing the 'convicted felon' label, which could overshadow the former president's political message.

  • What is the speaker's opinion on the judge's handling of the case?

    -The speaker criticizes the judge's handling of the case, suggesting that the judge was biased, allowed prejudicial testimony, and did not provide a fair trial.

  • What does the speaker believe will be the impact of the conviction on the former president's supporters?

    -The speaker believes that the conviction will likely galvanize the former president's supporters and increase their enthusiasm to vote, potentially benefiting him electorally.

  • What is the speaker's view on the actions of Alvin Bragg, the District Attorney?

    -The speaker is critical of Alvin Bragg, accusing him of acting on a political agenda to convict the former president rather than upholding the rule of law.

  • What does the speaker suggest about the future of legal challenges against political figures?

    -The speaker suggests that if the current approach continues, there may be a shift towards pursuing individuals based on their political affiliations rather than actual crimes committed.

  • What is the speaker's prediction regarding the appeal process for the former president's conviction?

    -The speaker predicts that the conviction will be appealed and possibly reversed, but worries that it may come too late to influence the upcoming presidential election.

Outlines

00:00

😠 Disgraceful Prosecution of a Former President

The speaker expresses strong disapproval of the conviction of a former president, presumably Donald Trump, on charges of falsified business records. They argue that this is a politically motivated move to prevent him from running for office again. The speaker criticizes the legal system, suggesting that it has been weaponized to target political opponents, and implies that similar actions could be taken against other prominent figures in the future. They also mention various cases and individuals, accusing them of corruption and bias, and suggest that this sets a dangerous precedent for the country's legal and political landscape.

05:03

🤔 The Consequences of Politically Motivated Prosecution

This paragraph discusses the potential repercussions of the perceived politically motivated prosecution of a former president. The speaker warns that if this trend continues, it could lead to a tit-for-tat scenario where other political figures, including Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama, could face similar legal challenges. They argue that this could result in the revival of old cases and the passing of new laws to target political enemies. The speaker calls for a return to the rule of law and justice, rather than just convictions, and suggests that the current situation could lead to further division and decline in the country.

10:03

📢 Trump's Response to the Verdict and Future Implications

The speaker recounts Trump's immediate response to his conviction, in which he claims the trial was rigged and politically motivated. Trump asserts his innocence and frames the verdict as part of a larger effort to undermine him and his political aspirations. The speaker also speculates on the potential impact of the verdict on Trump's presidential campaign, suggesting that the timing of the sentencing could be strategically manipulated to disrupt his campaign. They predict that Trump will continue to fight the charges and that the case could be appealed, possibly reaching the US Supreme Court.

15:04

👥 The Legal and Political Players Involved

This paragraph delves into the roles of various legal and political figures involved in the case. The speaker criticizes the district attorney, Alvin Bragg, for his handling of the case and suggests that he has a personal vendetta against Trump. They also mention other individuals, such as Letitia James and Fanny Willis, who they believe are pursuing cases against Trump for political reasons. The speaker argues that these actions are part of a broader strategy to weaken Trump's political influence and damage his reputation.

20:06

🚨 Concerns Over Judicial Bias and the Integrity of the Legal Process

The speaker raises concerns about the impartiality of the judge presiding over the case and the integrity of the legal process. They argue that the judge allowed prejudicial testimony and evidence that should not have been admitted, which influenced the jury's decision. The speaker also criticizes the defense team for not objecting to certain jury instructions and for making strategic mistakes during the trial. They suggest that these factors contributed to an unjust verdict.

25:07

🔍 Media Reactions and the Impact on Public Perception

In this paragraph, the speaker anticipates the media's reaction to the verdict and its potential impact on public perception. They predict that the media will repeatedly emphasize Trump's status as a 'convicted felon,' which could sway public opinion against him. However, the speaker also suggests that this strategy could backfire, as it might increase support for Trump among his base and potentially attract undecided voters who are put off by the perceived unfairness of the legal proceedings.

🗳️ The Upcoming Election and the Role of the Voters

The speaker reflects on the upcoming election and the role that voters will play in determining the political future of the individuals involved. They suggest that the verdict may not have the desired effect on Trump's electoral prospects, as his supporters are likely to remain loyal despite the legal challenges he faces. The speaker also raises the question of whether independent voters and those who previously supported Trump but are now undecided will be swayed by the events surrounding the trial and the media's portrayal of them.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Alvin Bragg

Alvin Bragg is the Manhattan District Attorney who prosecuted former President Donald Trump. The script mentions Bragg in the context of the trial and conviction of Trump, suggesting a critical view of his role in the legal proceedings. The term is used to highlight perceived political motivations behind the case.

💡convicted felon

The term 'convicted felon' refers to someone who has been found guilty of a felony in a court of law. In the script, it is repeatedly used to describe the outcome of the trial involving Trump, emphasizing the legal consequences and the potential impact on his political future.

💡falsified business records

Falsified business records refer to official documents that have been altered or misrepresented. The script discusses this as the alleged crime for which Trump was convicted, suggesting that the case revolves around financial wrongdoing and dishonesty.

💡overcharged

To 'overcharge' in a legal context means to accuse someone of more crimes than are justified by the facts. The script claims that Trump was overcharged, implying that the prosecution was excessive and possibly politically motivated.

💡Banana Republic

The term 'Banana Republic' is used metaphorically to describe a politically unstable country with a government that is run in an undemocratic and corrupt manner. The script uses this term to criticize the perceived state of American governance and the rule of law.

💡Leticia James

Leticia James is the New York State Attorney General. The script mentions her in connection with efforts to 'bankrupt' Trump's company, suggesting a narrative of political vendetta against Trump and his business interests.

💡Eugene Carroll

Eugene Carroll is mentioned in the context of a sexual assault case brought against Trump. The script implies that the case is part of a pattern of legal actions intended to damage Trump's reputation and political aspirations.

💡Fanny Willis

Fanny Willis is a prosecutor involved in a case against Trump, as mentioned in the script. She is portrayed as part of a broader effort to use the legal system to hinder Trump's political career.

💡corrupt

The term 'corrupt' is used in the script to describe the actions of various legal figures and the legal process itself. It suggests a belief that the legal system has been compromised for political ends.

💡lawfare

Lawfare refers to the use of legal processes as a form of warfare, often to harass or undermine an opponent. The script uses this term to describe what it sees as a strategic use of the legal system against Trump.

💡Pandora's Box

Pandora's Box is a metaphorical reference to a source of great and unexpected troubles. In the script, it is used to suggest that the legal actions against Trump have opened up a dangerous precedent that could affect others in the future.

Highlights

The speaker expresses strong disapproval of the conviction of a former president, suggesting it is politically motivated and disgraceful for the country.

Criticism of the legal system, accusing it of being biased and treating the former president unfairly, likening the situation to a 'Banana Republic'.

The conviction is described as being based on falsified business records and an overcharged case, with the implication of political motivations behind the charges.

Concern raised about the timing of legal cases against the former president, suggesting they are strategically planned to impact his political future.

Mention of various legal figures and cases, implying a coordinated effort to prevent the former president from running for office again.

The speaker predicts a potential backlash against the Democratic party, suggesting that their actions could lead to investigations and legal actions against their own members.

A call for 'turnabout is fair play', advocating for the Republicans to respond in kind to what the speaker perceives as Democratic attacks.

Discussion of the potential for legal appeals and the possibility of the conviction being overturned, expressing confidence in a higher court's ability to make a fair decision.

The former president's response to the verdict is shared, with him claiming innocence and vowing to continue to fight for the constitution.

Concern about the impact of the conviction on the country's legal and political systems, suggesting a 'Pandora's Box' has been opened.

The speaker speculates on the potential for future legal cases against other political figures, including Joe Biden and Barack Obama.

A detailed critique of the trial's proceedings, with specific examples of rulings and testimonies that the speaker believes were unfair to the defendant.

Discussion of the role of the media in shaping public opinion, with a prediction that the media will focus heavily on the 'convicted felon' label.

The potential impact of the conviction on voter behavior, with the speaker suggesting that it may energize Trump supporters and possibly sway some independent voters.

A call to action for the Republican party to be prepared to respond to what the speaker sees as politically motivated legal actions, suggesting a need for a stronger counterstrategy.

The speaker concludes by reiterating the belief that the legal actions against the former president are unjust and will ultimately backfire on the Democratic party.

Transcripts

00:00

this is

00:03

ridiculous what a sad day the country's

00:06

been

00:07

disgraced that's what's happened Alvin

00:11

Bragg and this judge have disgraced the

00:15

country we made it what almost 250 years

00:18

without doing this and now because of

00:22

falsified business

00:25

records we've convicted as a felon a

00:29

former president pres of the United

00:30

States you don't think we could have

00:32

done something like this to Bill Clinton

00:35

or Hillary Clinton or others we had a

00:39

standard we didn't do this in America we

00:42

aren't a Banana Republic or at least we

00:44

didn't used to be and don't forget

00:48

what's happened in this Trump case in

00:49

which he's now been found guilty of all

00:52

34 counts against him which was

00:54

overcharged to begin with it shouldn't

00:56

have been a case at all and once charged

00:58

it should have been one count

01:00

the whole case boils down to the same

01:03

alleged scheme but they stretched it

01:06

into 34 counts by saying and that check

01:08

and that check and that check and that

01:10

invoice and that invoice it was all part

01:13

of your scheme so now he looks like Al

01:15

Capone convicted on these 34

01:18

counts but the idea all along was to

01:23

stop him from becoming president again

01:26

that's the idea behind this prosecution

01:29

that is the idea behind Leticia James

01:32

bankrupting his company that he built

01:35

and along with his dad from the ground

01:37

up in New York the city that just turned

01:39

on him that was the idea behind egene

01:42

Carroll and her sexual assault case

01:46

brought 30 years after the fact alleging

01:49

a sexual assault SL rape in a Bergdorf

01:52

Goodman dressing room a case she

01:55

couldn't even remember the year of the

01:58

alleged rape in

02:00

and that's the idea behind Fanny Willis

02:03

and Jack Smith times to stop it stop him

02:09

stop Trump why did they wait why didn't

02:12

these cases come until right before the

02:14

presidential election the Democrats have

02:16

been ringing their hands wasn't in time

02:19

we're not going to be able to call him a

02:20

convicted felon unless you speed these

02:22

things up the judge in the DC January

02:27

6th case saying I'll rush back I'll come

02:30

back from my European Vacation don't you

02:31

worry if we get Supreme Court opinions

02:33

allowing my case to go forward with Jack

02:35

Smith I'll be

02:37

there we've heard about the concern that

02:39

Fanny Willis her case is going up an

02:41

appeal but she's going to try to find

02:43

some way to pedal to the medal it we've

02:45

heard even in that January 6th case

02:48

before judge chuin there may be a plan

02:51

to try to get him

02:52

tried even after he wins if he wins in

02:56

November we could have a trial of the

02:59

president President elect in an effort

03:02

to get him another conviction so they

03:05

could convince electors to be

03:08

unfaithful on January 6th of 2025 and

03:12

not s this whole scheme and here it is

03:16

the proper word is

03:19

corrupt it's a before and after moment

03:21

for

03:22

America what just happened today is a

03:25

line we can't

03:28

uncross and these Democrats will rule

03:31

the day they decided to use

03:35

lawfare to stop a presidential

03:38

candidate I'm not talking about violence

03:41

I'm talking about tit fortat you just

03:44

wait and it won't be Hunter Biden the

03:48

next time it's going to be Joe Biden it

03:51

could potentially still be Barack Obama

03:54

it could still potentially be Hillary

03:56

Clinton we're going to have to look at

03:59

what the statutes of limitations are on

04:01

the various crimes they surely committed

04:03

we're going to have to look at passing

04:05

laws to revive those dead crimes

04:09

felonies or misdem meters so that those

04:12

cases can be brought out of time that

04:15

what that's what may be in the interest

04:17

of Justice just like they did for EEG

04:19

Carroll with a New York state law that

04:22

was passed so that she could sue him

04:27

that's what

04:28

happened turn turn about is fair play

04:31

and John Yu an amazing lawyer who worked

04:35

in the bush administration department of

04:37

justice has a great piece out today

04:39

talking about how that's the only way

04:42

they'll learn the only way to save the

04:45

Republic now is to give them a taste of

04:47

their own medicine that's

04:49

it that's it they tasted blood today

04:54

they're the wolves with the bloody piece

04:57

of meat in their mouths that doesn't

04:59

stop the wolf from coming back for more

05:02

the only thing that will stop him is if

05:04

he loses a limb of his

05:06

own and I'm sorry but the Democrats

05:08

started this game and the same way the

05:10

Republicans upped the ante when it came

05:12

to for example the filibuster fight the

05:15

Democrats got rid of it for lower court

05:17

judges Mitch McConnell said you will Ru

05:19

the day because we're going to be in

05:21

control of this chamber one day and

05:23

you're going to lose the filibuster at

05:24

the higher level court and you you'll be

05:26

sorry that's what needs to happen here

05:29

who's getting next Joe Biden maybe Jill

05:32

Biden how low can we

05:35

go you may not want to see it that that

05:40

ship has already left Port that horse

05:42

has left the barn that's where we're

05:45

going so before you celebrate too much

05:48

over at MSNBC and CNN who are positively

05:52

gleeful Gul over this absurd conviction

05:56

you wait and ask yourself ask yourself

06:00

what kind of Pandora's Box has been

06:01

opened here here was President Trump

06:04

moments after the guilty verdict

06:09

today this was a disgrace this was a

06:13

rigged trial by a conflicted judge who

06:16

was

06:16

corrupt it's a Rigg trial of

06:20

disgrace they wouldn't give us a venue

06:22

change we were at 5% or

06:26

6% in this District in this area

06:30

this was a rigged disgraceful trial the

06:34

real verdict is going to be November 5th

06:37

by the people and they know what

06:39

happened here and everybody knows what

06:41

happened here you have a Sor respect

06:44

back da and the whole thing we didn't do

06:47

a thing wrong I'm a very innocent

06:51

man and it's okay I'm fighting for our

06:54

country I'm fighting for our

06:56

constitution our whole country is being

06:58

rigged right now this was done by the

07:00

Biden

07:02

Administration in order to wound or hurt

07:05

an opponent a political opponent and I

07:08

think it's a just a disgrace and we'll

07:11

keep fighting we'll fight till the end

07:12

and we'll win because our country's gone

07:15

to hell we don't have the same country

07:17

anymore we have a divided mess we're

07:20

nation in Decline serious decline

07:22

millions and millions of people pouring

07:24

into our country right now from prisons

07:28

and from mental institutions terrorists

07:32

and they're taking over our country we

07:34

have a country that's in big trouble but

07:36

this was a rigged decision right from

07:38

day one with a conflicted judge who

07:41

should have never been allowed to try

07:42

this case never and we will fight for

07:45

our constitution this is long from over

07:48

thank you very

07:49

much good for him long from over is

07:53

absolutely right this will be reversed

07:56

it will be reversed this will not stand

07:59

mark my words even in a New York appell

08:01

court system that is weighted with

08:03

Democrats on the bench the the highest

08:05

court in New York is called the court of

08:07

appeals it's not completely corrupt it

08:10

just overturned the conviction of Harvey

08:12

Weinstein because he wasn't given a fair

08:14

trial they are capable of reaching a

08:17

rational decision and if they're not

08:19

this could be appealed up higher still

08:21

to the US Supreme Court there were state

08:23

constitutional violations here and there

08:25

were federal constitutional violations

08:28

here let me ask you a question for those

08:29

of you sitting at home who listen to

08:31

this show what was the underlying

08:34

crime what did the jury find Trump was

08:37

trying to cover up with this falsified

08:40

business record was it federal election

08:43

campaign law violations was it tax law

08:47

violations was it additional business

08:49

records violations do you know no you

08:52

don't neither do I no one knows neither

08:55

does Donald Trump good luck good Luck's

08:58

filing your appeal he's in the same

08:59

position he was in when he had to stand

09:01

up first and argue the closing argument

09:03

before he had even heard the

09:04

prosecutions theory of the case now he's

09:06

got to go up to the appella court and

09:07

try to guess gee I don't really know

09:09

what I've been found guilty of I guess

09:11

falsifying business records through

09:13

unlawful means and the unlawful Means

09:16

War

09:18

uh uh I don't know I I I don't know

09:23

we're not sure if the jurors took door

09:25

number one door number two or door

09:26

number three that's the position he's in

09:28

Alvin Brad

09:30

ran for office on a promise to get Trump

09:36

a Soros backed da who doesn't want to

09:39

enforce the criminal law against anyone

09:43

that's why we were all leaving New York

09:45

in droves because of his

09:48

policies and the policies of his old

09:51

boss the old mayor in New York and this

09:55

guy promised if you elect me I'll get

09:59

him remember

10:03

this when I was to the AG's office I

10:05

sued Trump over a hundred times for his

10:07

administration's misconduct and brought

10:10

a case against the Trump foundation and

10:12

held him accountable I'm the candidate

10:14

in the race who has the experience with

10:15

with Donald Trump I was the chief Deputy

10:18

in the Attorney General's office we sued

10:20

the Trump Administration over a hundred

10:22

times I know how to to litigate uh with

10:25

him I also led the team that did the

10:26

Trump Foundation case so uh I'm ready

10:29

ready to go wherever the facts take me

10:31

I'd be hard to argue with the fact that

10:32

that's that'd be the most important most

10:34

high-profile case and I've seen him

10:36

upfront and seen the lawlessness that he

10:38

can do so I do have a lot of experience

10:40

uh with the former president I think

10:42

it's important to elect someone who is

10:44

well prepared to pick up wherever um the

10:47

city district attorney leaves off if if

10:49

if brought would be one of the most

10:50

consequential cases in the history of

10:53

local enforcement and we need someone

10:54

who's ready on day

10:56

one he should be disbarred

10:59

he should be dispar that's how much

11:01

damage he's done to the justice system

11:03

that guy moments after the verdict was

11:06

read tweeting out today a jury found

11:09

Donald J Trump guilty in all caps he's

11:11

so excited on all all caps again 34

11:16

felony counts you go guy you must be so

11:20

happy you lived up to your campaign

11:21

promises I'll give you that one hell of

11:23

a politician one shitty prosecutor whose

11:27

obligation is to uphold the rule of law

11:29

and to seek justice justice not just

11:33

convictions that's what you're after

11:35

just convictions in the case of Donald

11:36

Trump that's all I want just give me The

11:39

Big C so I can get him like I promised

11:42

he's so proud today just like the AG in

11:45

New York is so proud of bankrupting

11:47

Trump's business or doing her level best

11:50

and we could go on FYI at this hour

11:54

Trump's donation website has

11:57

crashed you can feel you can feel the

12:00

number of people going there to Pony up

12:03

do they didn't think they had they

12:05

thought they had given their last

12:07

donation people are hurting right now

12:09

there's tons of inflation thanks to Joe

12:11

Biden and other problems that we're all

12:14

suffering they're donating and I'm sure

12:17

it's by the tens of million this will be

12:20

a financial windfall for the Trump

12:22

campaign and arguably for

12:26

America this jury the jury of the

12:29

American voters will be heard on

12:31

November 5th they will have the final

12:34

word and in the meantime Donald Trump

12:37

will hear the term convicted felon every

12:41

day everywhere he

12:44

goes the sentencing will not take place

12:49

until July

12:51

11th that is 4 days before the

12:54

Republican National

12:56

Convention that's the big event they

12:59

have the balloon drop the candidate's

13:01

family shows up it gets the party

13:05

excited for their nominee like what's

13:08

his vision of the country versus The

13:10

Other Guys how could he help my

13:12

life what what might he do that could

13:15

make things better for my kids versus

13:17

what the other guy's promising let me

13:19

hear the platform let me hear your

13:21

surrogates let me hear you and what you

13:23

stand for and

13:26

instead they've decided to corrupt it

13:28

this judge of course of course he

13:31

has by saddling Trump with his

13:33

sentencing 4 days before it starts one

13:35

week before he accepts the Republican

13:37

nomination for president of the United

13:40

States he'll be sitting in the New York

13:42

courtroom and there is a decent chance

13:46

he's going to be wearing an ankle

13:47

bracelet I don't think Trump's going to

13:49

get jail time I've said that from the

13:52

beginnings gagos took me on on that he

13:54

said anybody not named Trump would I

13:56

don't think he's going to get jail time

13:59

but it's not outside the realm of

14:01

possibility not with this

14:03

judge not with this da both sides have

14:06

to submit their recommendations what

14:09

they believe should happen that's going

14:10

to happen uh by I think June

14:13

13th and what do you think this da is

14:16

going to seek do you think the da is

14:17

going to say released on his own

14:18

recognizance community service what do

14:21

you think he's going to recommend and

14:22

this judge Maran has done everything

14:25

Alvin Bragg has asked him to everything

14:28

Alvin brag won

14:32

99.99% of the motion practice in front

14:34

of this

14:37

judge I mean I I don't think Trump is

14:41

getting jail time but I am not so

14:42

certain I can predict it sitting here

14:45

tonight um so the sentencing July 11th

14:50

in the meantime reporting here from CNBC

14:53

Trump will be free to speak to the Press

14:55

travel and continue continue his

14:57

presidential campaign he will no longer

14:59

be bound by the gag order oh that's

15:01

sweet that dis that barred him from

15:04

discussing Witnesses jurors and the

15:06

judge's family members she must be so

15:08

thrilled the judge's daughter who's

15:10

making tens of millions of dollars off

15:12

of her own get Trump campaign for people

15:14

like Adam Schiff she must be absolutely

15:16

joyous tonight can you imagine the

15:17

dinner they're having in the merchant

15:19

household judge michon and his Rich

15:22

daughter who's getting even richer by

15:23

the second thanks to this

15:25

verdict he should have been disqualified

15:28

he should not have prided over this

15:30

case the appeal will be filed of course

15:34

and it will take months if not

15:36

years I mean months if not years you

15:39

know how they rushed this case they

15:40

rushed the January 6th case once he

15:42

filed it once Jack Smith actually filed

15:44

it now everybody's in a rush they're not

15:46

going to be in a rush to resolve that

15:48

appeal not the one that's going to take

15:50

away the convicted felon label oh

15:53

no the

15:55

Biden campaign has responded to The

15:58

Verdict by encouraging people to vote

16:01

the Biden White House so far has

16:04

released only the following statement

16:06

through a spokesman quote we respect the

16:08

rule of law and have no additional

16:10

comment no you don't it's a lie you

16:14

don't it's your Department of Justice

16:16

that's brought the two most serious

16:18

cases against Donald Trump the ones that

16:20

actually could land him in jail that's

16:22

because of

16:23

you and by the way we know that you

16:25

coordinated with Fanny Willis in her

16:27

case against him too we know that you

16:29

were putting pressure on Merrick Garland

16:31

you were upset that he took so long to

16:32

actually indict the cases we know that

16:36

you're you're not you don't respect the

16:38

rule of law you've shat all over it

16:41

that's what you did and we know it

16:44

now

16:52

the I'm just I'm just looking back at my

16:55

notes here as as I go on

16:59

Trump said it was rigged and the people

17:00

over on MSNBC freaked out that he said

17:02

that word because they associate it now

17:04

with Trump's electoral claims that he

17:07

denied Joe Biden actually

17:10

won this case was rigged it was rigged

17:15

against Donald Trump and there was

17:16

ruling after ruling after ruling that

17:18

would show you that I'll just give you a

17:20

couple all right this judge allowed in

17:23

the fact that David pecker of Ami the

17:26

national inquir had a non-prosecution

17:27

agreement with the feds

17:29

around election fraud claims election

17:32

you know campaign uh

17:35

donation claims he allowed David pecker

17:38

to testify to that never should have

17:39

happened total totally unfairly

17:41

prejudicial to the defendant the jury

17:43

was left the impression that he was

17:45

guilty of this scheme so Donald Trump

17:47

must be too Michael Cohen same thing was

17:49

allowed to testify that he pleaded

17:52

guilty and serve time wasn't really for

17:54

this crime but that he did plead guilty

17:57

to same thing violate federal election

18:00

campaign Finance law the jury never

18:02

should have been allowed to hear that

18:05

the prosecutor or argued it over and

18:07

over and over he mentioned it so many

18:09

times in his closing and elsewhere to

18:12

the point where finally the judge had to

18:13

issue a limiting instruction to the jury

18:15

saying ah you're not really allowed to

18:17

consider that those agreements and those

18:19

plea deals to decide whether Trump is

18:21

guilty it's technically just to assess

18:23

The credibility of these Witnesses but

18:26

let me just tell you how bass awards

18:27

that is the way those agreements a

18:30

guilty plea would typically come in

18:32

against a testifying witness is by the

18:35

defense attorney the defense attorney

18:37

who wants to poke holes in the story

18:38

would get up there and say you're a damn

18:40

Criminal Michael Cohen you pleaded

18:42

guilty to this or you David pecker you'd

18:45

be in jail right now if you hadn't

18:46

signed this prosecution agreement the

18:48

defense would normally do that to attack

18:50

somebody's credibility here the

18:52

prosecution brought it in on Direct of

18:56

their own Witnesses why because they

18:59

knew the defense would never do that

19:02

they had enough ways to poke holes in

19:04

the testimony of those two men and it

19:06

would have been far too prejudicial to

19:08

Trump to bring it up so the prosecution

19:11

brought it up on its own and it never

19:14

should have been allowed at the same

19:16

time the judge B Brad Smith Trump's

19:18

campaign Finance expert the former

19:21

commissioner of the FEC which has

19:23

exclusive jurisdiction to pursue claims

19:26

for violations of federal campaign

19:28

Finance law law barred his testimony as

19:32

unnecessary reduced Donald Trump if

19:34

you're going to put him on at all to

19:35

letting him Define a couple of terms

19:37

rendering him totally useless and

19:39

pointless so they didn't call him the

19:42

jury would have been confused why did he

19:43

get up there Define four terms and get

19:46

down so he sent the jury into that room

19:49

with Michael cohens and David peckers

19:51

and the prosecutors understanding a

19:54

federal election law that's it are you

19:57

shocked shocked that they when they got

19:59

in there with no counterbalance said

20:01

yeah it sounds like he did it look at

20:02

those other guys they're guilty of it

20:05

time and time again Stormy Daniels we we

20:09

did it without a condom yeah I I'm I'm

20:13

suddenly a me too victim he allowed it

20:15

all go on he they tried to stop it at

20:20

the front he said no she can do it she

20:21

can testify then in the middle she gets

20:24

salacious and disgusting and he calls a

20:26

sidebar saying why didn't you object

20:28

more to the Trump team okay fine she

20:30

should have objected more you just told

20:32

them they could do all of this right

20:35

it's like you you allowed it all you

20:37

green lit it it happened and then you

20:39

blam the defense for not being more

20:40

vocal while it was happening that's on

20:42

you judge Mera you did that there wasn't

20:46

an

20:48

objection that the prosecution raised

20:52

that he didn't sustain I mean if you

20:54

watch the if you read the jury

20:55

transcripts it's just ridiculous the

20:56

number of times he seed the floor to the

20:59

prosecution and dumped all over the

21:01

defense what he did to Costello I know

21:04

he was angry Costello wasn't a good

21:06

witness Trump insisted on calling him

21:08

that was clear only called two witnesses

21:10

he was the only substantive one and

21:12

Costello didn't like the judge and

21:13

behaved kind of badly and the judge

21:15

chose to humiliate him and throw a

21:17

temper tantrum and clear the courtroom

21:19

and basically telegraphed to the jury

21:21

that he didn't like him and didn't

21:22

believe him and guess what happened then

21:25

he wasn't even mentioned in the

21:26

defense's closing argument right it

21:29

didn't go well and the judge saw to it

21:32

that it wouldn't go well because he

21:33

couldn't man up when Costello behaved

21:37

poorly as a witness with the side eye

21:40

and some mumbling under his breath in

21:44

response to the judge's

21:46

comments Trump's team made mistakes and

21:48

that's without

21:50

question without

21:52

question he should have not admitted the

21:55

affair with stormy that wasn't necessary

21:58

but should have stipulated for the

22:01

purposes of trial let's assume something

22:04

did take place the defendant denies it

22:07

but doesn't see it as relevant to this

22:09

case we agree I think the prosecution

22:11

would have taken that the whole argument

22:13

is not over whether he had the one

22:15

nighter with her the arguments over

22:18

whether he entered into a scheme to shut

22:20

these women up who were threatening

22:22

him he had denied that he had an affair

22:25

with her from the beginning and he felt

22:26

the need to continue denying it even

22:28

even in the legal case this is one time

22:31

where Trump the guru of like seeing

22:33

things and like Landing it even though

22:35

everybody criticizes him for the

22:37

decision- making then after the fact

22:38

you're like oh my God he was right he

22:40

wasn't right here this is one time he

22:42

wasn't right he shouldn't have done that

22:45

it was not necessary to open the door to

22:47

her

22:49

testimony um they didn't object to half

22:52

of those jury instructions they didn't

22:54

object to the definition in there of

22:57

campaign Finance violations my God what

23:01

they let the jury go back there thinking

23:03

that what was in Donald Trump is the

23:05

governing standard what what was in

23:07

Donald's head is the governing standard

23:09

on figuring out whether somebody

23:10

violated election law was it was it

23:12

mostly for the campaign okay well that

23:13

it might have been no that's not the

23:15

standard the standard is what's the

23:17

nature of the payment is it the kind of

23:19

payment that could ever be made for

23:21

anything other than to advance a

23:22

campaign and if the answer is sure it is

23:25

it could be used in a number of

23:26

different circumstances like a hush

23:27

money payment then it's not a campaign

23:29

Finance

23:31

situation Brad Smith would have said

23:33

that had he been given the

23:34

chance the judge did not understand the

23:37

law and his jury instructions reflect

23:41

that the days to come will include

23:45

over-the-top reactions by the media

23:48

already we're getting things like Ellie

23:50

Mall who writes for the nation who's on

23:52

jooy Reed's show every night absolute

23:54

racist This Man convicted felons don't

23:57

get to vote vot

24:00

aha okay he may not be able to vote but

24:05

his supporters sure

24:07

can and if I know the country and I

24:10

think I do I don't think there's

24:12

anything you can do to stop the Trump

24:14

voters now I mean I think as much as

24:17

Maga was prepared to vote for Trump

24:19

before and even disaffected Republicans

24:23

who might not love Trump they're going

24:25

to run to the polls now they're going to

24:27

run to the polls now the question that

24:30

we have in the coming days and weeks is

24:34

what

24:35

about those groups of Republican voters

24:39

who voted for Joe Biden the last time

24:41

who were starting to come home who were

24:44

going to overlook some of Trump's

24:46

personality ticks that make him less

24:48

than appealing to a l a large number of

24:50

in particular

24:51

women who are starting to give him

24:53

another

24:54

look and that folks I don't know the

24:56

answer to

24:59

Independence if you believe the polling

25:01

large numbers of them said convicted

25:04

felon could change it for me even some

25:07

20 to 30% of the Republican base when P

25:10

said convicted felon might change it for

25:12

me I don't believe

25:14

it I don't believe it not here not off

25:17

this BS but you can't underestimate the

25:20

media and their constant drum beat that

25:25

we're we're going to get we're going to

25:26

get over and over over and over again

25:29

convicted fell and convicted fell and

25:31

convicted F and how is Trump going to

25:32

get any

25:33

Oxygen you know for his

25:37

message I don't know where this

25:40

lands if I have to predict I

25:43

say Trump gets no jail time and gets a

25:48

reversal on appeal but it comes too late

25:51

well pass the presidential

25:53

election you've got Tish James of New

25:56

York the AG tweeting out no one is above

25:58

the

26:00

law

26:01

really he was treated as beneath the law

26:05

as beneath

26:06

scorn what you've done to him I went

26:09

through the cases four criminal eing

26:11

Caroll Tish James this Fanny Willis

26:14

debacle down in Atlanta what a farce

26:17

what a joke she is does anyone take her

26:19

seriously you saw now like seeing her

26:22

through that whole disqualification

26:23

thing it shows you shows you look what

26:26

he's up against look at this hard is in

26:28

rabid person down there do you think

26:31

that's a fair prosecutor who's going to

26:33

give him a fair trial if she's given the

26:35

chance she just she's not even smart at

26:37

least Jack Smith seems kind of smart not

26:40

not very good and obviously not honest

26:42

but like not a

26:43

dumbass um it's amazing Joy Reed was out

26:47

there the other night talking about how

26:49

fun it was going to be to see all of her

26:51

this is how she put it her Dei hires all

26:53

her Dei my Dei taking Trump

26:56

down well she's not wrong that Soros

27:00

backed

27:01

Das hand placed in these positions to

27:04

not prosecute real

27:06

crime like Alvin Bragg Fanny Willis and

27:10

others have seen a crime for the first

27:12

time and gotten excited and salivated

27:14

over the prospect of pursuing it because

27:16

the defendant's name was Donald

27:18

Trump in this country we're supposed to

27:20

pursue crimes not people in the criminal

27:24

justice system it's a before and after

27:26

moment for the law

27:28

and for

27:30

us so what I think is going to

27:33

happen is I think

27:36

electorally it's going to help Trump

27:39

more than it hurts him that's my bet I

27:41

don't know we'll see the polling over

27:43

the next few weeks I don't believe the

27:46

soccer moms are going to be so disgusted

27:48

by this business records nonsense that

27:50

they're going to say I can't vote for

27:52

him but I don't know because the media

27:56

is just going to be Non-Stop

27:59

and I don't know that the increased

28:01

enthusiasm on the GOP side will be

28:03

enough you you can't win with just

28:05

Republicans you need Independence too

28:08

net net

28:10

though you couldn't ask for something

28:12

better to stimulate enthusiasm on the

28:13

GOP side you couldn't ask for better

28:16

this doesn't stimulate Democrats they're

28:18

not like yeah now I'm really going to

28:20

vote for Joe I mean if anything they're

28:23

going to watch how Trump handles this

28:24

they might feel a little sorry for the

28:25

guy what are we doing right who are we

28:30

you'll find out read the John U please

28:33

piece on National Review you'll find out

28:36

when the shoe is on the other foot and

28:38

all your favorites Let's find let's take

28:40

a look into Michelle Obama does she do

28:42

anything let's find out let's kick the

28:43

tires a little on their

28:46

foundation and figure out whether

28:48

there's a crime to be had if that's how

28:49

we're going to do it now we're going to

28:51

pursue the person not the crime then

28:55

let's do that great why not do Jill what

28:59

the hell how about Joe you know what we

29:02

already had a special counsel say that

29:03

he was guilty of a felony but he

29:05

couldn't pursue him because well meaning

29:06

elderly man who a jury wouldn't convict

29:09

well that's not always going to be the

29:11

case when Trump takes over if Trump

29:13

takes over we might need a new Fresh

29:15

look at the Joe Biden case I'm sorry we

29:19

didn't make these rules but we're going

29:21

to have to Lo learn how to play by them

29:24

we'll have more for you on this program

29:26

tomorrow with full coverage with all of

29:28

our Legal Eagles our our superpower

29:32

lawyers all of our cast of favorites

29:34

will be here with reaction and there'll

29:35

be plenty between now and then thanks

29:36

for listening

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Tags associés
Trump ConvictionPolitical AnalysisAmerican DemocracyLegal ControversyElection ImpactMedia ReactionGOP EnthusiasmDemocratic ResponseLegal AppealPresidential Campaign
Avez-vous besoin d'un résumé en français?