‘Coup dominos falling’: Trump’s prison odds increase as lawyers face consequences

MSNBC
28 Mar 202411:31

Summary

TLDRThe segment from 'The Beat with Ari Melber' discusses significant legal setbacks for Donald Trump and his associates, particularly focusing on John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark, who face the risk of being disbarred due to their roles in attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The narrative highlights a California judge's decision against Eastman and the ongoing criminal trials in Georgia. It underscores the broader implications of these legal actions, signaling a warning to lawyers contemplating similar conduct in support of anti-democratic efforts. Additionally, the script touches on the potential for a 'Putin-style' approach to political adversaries in a hypothetical second Trump term, emphasizing the seriousness of the threats to democratic norms.

Takeaways

  • 📝 A California judge has ruled against Trump lawyer John Eastman, who is awaiting a criminal trial in Georgia for his role in the January 6th coup plot.
  • 🔥 Eastman is considered the legal mastermind behind attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, with significant legal setbacks now mounting against him.
  • 🛡️ The ruling includes Eastman's disbarment over his conduct related to the 2020 election and his efforts to obstruct a lawful government function.
  • 👊 Both Eastman and Jeffrey Clark, another Trump lawyer, face the risk of losing their law licenses, signaling a strong message to lawyers considering similar actions.
  • 🚫 Eastman and Clark's disbarment processes underscore a broader accountability effort against anti-democracy lawyers who misuse their knowledge for political ends.
  • 📗 Giuliani and other Trump lawyers face disciplinary actions or have already been disciplined, highlighting a pattern of legal consequences for those involved in undermining the election.
  • 📌 The script emphasizes the unique and historically unprecedented nature of the January 6th event, orchestrated by a small number of lawyers exploiting their expertise.
  • 💡 The segment points out the ongoing accountability measures for key Trump associates and officials, including those already facing prison time for their roles in related offenses.
  • 🖥 Bannon's public statements about a potential second Trump term include threats of political prosecutions against Democrats, echoing authoritarian tactics.
  • 🙁 The narrative concludes with a reflection on the dangers of using government power to target political opponents, warning of the implications for American democracy.

Q & A

  • What significant ruling was made by a California judge against Trump's lawyer, John Eastman?

    -A California judge ruled that John Eastman should be disbarred and expelled from his profession as a lifelong attorney over his conduct in plots related to the 2020 election.

  • What legal risks are John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark facing?

    -John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark are at risk of losing their law licenses, have been searched by agents in a separate federal case, and also await criminal trials.

  • What did the State Bar Investigative Unit prove about John Eastman?

    -The State Bar Investigative Unit proved that John Eastman conspired with Trump to obstruct a lawful function of the government through the January 6th plot.

  • Why is being disbarred a significant warning to lawyers?

    -Being disbarred serves as a warning to other lawyers who might consider similar actions on behalf of politicians, indicating that such behavior could end their ability to practice law.

  • What privilege did Jeffrey Clark invoke during his disbarment hearing?

    -Jeffrey Clark invoked the Fifth Amendment, executive privilege, law enforcement privilege, deliberate process privilege, and attorney-client privilege during his disbarment hearing.

  • How many Trump lawyers are facing disciplinary action, and who are some of them?

    -Four other Trump lawyers besides Clark and Eastman are facing disciplinary action, including Rudy Giuliani, whose law license is already suspended in New York.

  • What impact did lawyers have on the January 6th event according to the script?

    -The script suggests that lawyers played a key role in making January 6th a significant date in American politics, as they were the masterminds behind the plots and conspiracy theories.

  • What are the potential consequences for Donald Trump mentioned in the script?

    -Donald Trump faces his own criminal trials, with two indictments specifically related to the coup plot, and the possibility of trial before the election depending on the Supreme Court's decisions.

  • What did Steve Bannon say about Democrats in any second Trump term?

    -Steve Bannon stated that Democrats would be imprisoned in any second Trump term, indicating a Putin-style effort of going after political opponents.

  • What broader pattern is identified in the legal actions against Trump associates?

    -The script identifies a broader pattern of accountability reaching key players in Trump's orbit, with several facing disbarment, criminal charges, or imprisonment, marking a significant move against those involved in the January 6th plots and related activities.

Outlines

00:00

📜 Legal Consequences for Trump Aides

This paragraph discusses the legal ramifications faced by some of former President Trump's aides, particularly focusing on John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark. It details the various legal setbacks for Eastman, who was the architect of key plans related to the January 6th coup plots, as revealed during the January 6th hearings. A California judge has ruled against Eastman, and he faces disbarment due to his conduct and lies surrounding the 2020 election. Clark, another indicted Trump plotter, is also at risk of losing his law license. The paragraph emphasizes the significance of these legal actions as a warning to other lawyers who might consider similar actions in the future, highlighting the importance of upholding democracy and the rule of law.

05:01

🏛️ Trump's Legal Tactic of Delay and its Failure

This paragraph examines former President Trump's favored legal tactic of delay and its eventual failure, especially in the cases of Clark and Eastman. It notes that these two join a growing list of Trump lawyers facing disciplinary action, including Giuliani, Ellis, Powal, and Chesebro. The paragraph also highlights the significance of January 6th in American politics, which was not a significant date before the events of that day. It points out that a small group of lawyers was instrumental in popularizing January 6th and turning it into a focal point for conspiracy theorists. The paragraph further discusses the accountability faced by key players in Trump's orbit, including Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon, and the potential legal challenges that Trump himself may face.

10:03

🚨 Public Intimidation Tactics

This paragraph delves into the public intimidation tactics used by some associated with former President Trump, particularly focusing on Steve Bannon's statements about the potential imprisonment of Democrats in the event of a second Trump term. It discusses the implications of such public declarations, which are seen as an attempt to instill fear and deter association with political opponents. The paragraph also compares these tactics to those used by Putin, highlighting the use of government power to target opponents and send a broader message to the public. It emphasizes the importance of maintaining democratic norms and the rule of law in the face of such tactics.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Disbarment

Disbarment refers to the removal of a lawyer from the legal profession's official registry, effectively revoking their license to practice law. In the context of the video, disbarment is highlighted as a significant penalty for lawyers John Eastman and potentially Jeffrey Clark, due to their involvement in plotting to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. This punishment serves as a deterrent to other lawyers who might consider engaging in similar unlawful or unethical actions, illustrating the legal system's ability to enforce accountability within its ranks.

💡January 6th

January 6th refers to the date of the Capitol riot in 2021, where supporters of former President Donald Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election results. This event is central to the video's narrative, serving as a critical point of discussion around the efforts by Trump's legal team to challenge the election outcome. The video highlights how the actions leading up to and on January 6th have led to legal repercussions for those involved, emphasizing the date as a pivotal moment in American political history.

💡Coup plot

The term 'coup plot' in the video refers to the plans and actions undertaken by certain individuals, including lawyers and aides close to former President Trump, with the intent of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election. This illegal attempt is presented as a significant breach of democratic norms, with the video detailing the legal masterminds behind these efforts and their subsequent legal challenges, including trials and disbarment hearings.

💡Electoral Count Act

The Electoral Count Act is mentioned in the context of acknowledging actions by John Eastman that would violate its provisions. This act is critical to the United States' electoral process, outlining procedures for counting electoral votes and resolving disputes over their validity. Eastman's admission that his proposals would breach several aspects of this act underscores the legal boundaries being tested in the aftermath of the 2020 election.

💡Fifth Amendment

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is invoked by Jeffrey Clark during his disbarment hearing as a defense against self-incrimination. This legal principle allows individuals to refuse to answer questions if their responses could incriminate them. In the video, this action is portrayed as a defensive move by Clark, yet one that does not absolve him from the possibility of disbarment if evidence supports such an outcome, illustrating the complexity of legal defenses in these cases.

💡Lawyers

Lawyers, specifically those working for Donald Trump, are a focal point of the video, highlighting their roles in attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The narrative emphasizes the disbarment and legal challenges faced by these lawyers, including John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark, as consequences of their actions. This aspect of the story underscores the legal profession's responsibility to uphold the law and the severe repercussions for those who breach ethical standards.

💡Putin-style attacks

Putin-style attacks refer to the aggressive and often unlawful tactics used by Russian President Vladimir Putin to suppress political opposition. The video mentions convicted Trump aides threatening such attacks if Trump is re-elected, implying a readiness to use state power against political adversaries in a manner that undermines democratic norms and the rule of law. This comparison is used to highlight the severity of the rhetoric and intentions behind the actions of certain Trump supporters.

💡Accountability

Accountability is a recurring theme in the video, referring to the legal and professional consequences faced by individuals involved in the coup plot. This concept is illustrated through the disbarment proceedings against John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark, criminal trials, and other disciplinary actions against lawyers who participated in efforts to overturn the election. The video underscores the importance of holding individuals accountable for actions that threaten democratic processes.

💡Executive privilege

Executive privilege is claimed by Jeffrey Clark as part of his defense in the disbarment hearing. This legal principle allows the president and other high-level executives to withhold information from Congress, the courts, and ultimately the public. Clark's invocation of this privilege, along with others, is portrayed as a tactic to avoid answering questions, yet the video suggests that such a defense may not protect him from the consequences of his actions.

💡RICO case

RICO, which stands for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is mentioned in relation to charges against some of Trump's associates, highlighting the seriousness of the accusations against them. This federal law is designed to combat organized crime in the United States but is being applied here to alleged efforts to undermine the electoral process. The mention of RICO cases against individuals like Rudy Giuliani signifies the legal challenges they face, emphasizing the broad and severe nature of the legal repercussions stemming from the coup plot.

Highlights

Ari Melber opens "The Beat" discussing the significant news regarding convicted Trump aides and their threats of Putin-style attacks on opponents if Trump is re-elected.

A California judge rules against Trump lawyer John Eastman, who faces a criminal trial in Georgia for his role as the architect of coup plots revealed during the January 6th hearings.

Damning accounts from individuals who generally supported Trump's policies but denounced the coup Eastman plotted on Trump's behalf.

Eastman faces disbarment over his conduct related to the 2020 election, with findings that he conspired with Trump to obstruct a lawful government function.

Jeffrey Clark, another indicted Trump plotter, risks losing his law license and invokes various privileges during a disbarment hearing.

The segment highlights the broader pattern of accountability and the significance of disbarment as a warning to lawyers against anti-democracy actions.

The process of disbarment in several states is shown to deter lawyers from practicing law if they use their knowledge for unethical actions.

Other Trump lawyers, including Giuliani, Ellis, Powell, and Chesebro, face disciplinary action or have been convicted.

The influence of a small number of lawyers in popularizing January 6th as a significant date in American politics through the coup plot.

Key players in Trump's orbit facing accountability, with Peter Navarro being the first Trump White House official to report to prison.

Steve Bannon's conviction and the potential for his imprisonment, highlighting the ongoing legal challenges for Trump's associates.

Mark Meadows, a witness in Washington and indicted for RICO in Georgia, showcasing the wide net of legal issues surrounding Trump's team.

Trump himself faces criminal trials related to the coup, with prosecutors pushing for trials amidst the election year.

Bannon's public statements about a potential second Trump term include threats of political prosecutions against Democrats.

The segment concludes with the emphasis on the public nature of these threats and the resemblance to Putin's playbook, aiming to instill fear and send a message to opponents.

Transcripts

00:04

>>> THANK YOU SO PRUCH FOR

00:05

>>> THANK YOU SO PRUCH FOR

00:06

LETTING US INTO YOUR HOMES

00:07

DURING THESE TRULY EXTRAORDINARY

00:08

TIMES.

00:10

WE ARE GRATEFUL.

00:13

THE BEAT WITH ARI MELBER STARTS

00:16

RIGHT NOW.

00:18

>>> WELCOME TO "THE BEAT."

00:22

EVEN AS SOME CONVICTED TRUMP

00:24

AIDES ALSO THREATEN PUTIN-STYLE

00:26

ATTACKS ON OPPONENTS IF THEY

00:28

ACTUALLY GET TRUMP RE-ELECTED.

00:29

NOW, THIS BIG NEWS COMES AS A

00:31

CALIFORNIA JUDGE HAS RULED

00:32

AGAINST TRUMP LAWYER JOHN

00:34

EASTMAN TODAY WHO ALSO

00:35

SEPARATELY AWAITS A CRIMINAL

00:37

TRIAL IN GEORGIA.

00:39

AND THESE MOUNTING LEGAL

00:40

SETBACKS FOR EASTMAN ARE

00:41

SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE HE WAS THE

00:44

LEGAL MASTERMIND AND ARCHITECT

00:46

OF KEY PLANKS OF THE COUP PLOTS

00:50

AS THOSE JANUARY 6th HEARINGS

00:51

SHOWED.

00:52

>> ADOPT A SLATE OF ELECTORS

00:55

YOURSELVES.

00:55

>> HE STARTED TO ASK ME ABOUT

00:59

SOMETHING DEALING WITH GEORGIA,

01:00

PRESERVING SOMETHING POTENTIALLY

01:02

FOR APPEAL.

01:03

>> I DON'T THINK IT'S JUST YOUR

01:06

AUTHORITY TO DO THAT, BUT QUITE

01:08

FRANKLY I THINK YOU HAVE A DUTY

01:10

TO DO THAT.

01:12

>> DID EASTMAN ADMIT BEFORE THE

01:14

PRESIDENT IT WOULD VIOLATE THE

01:15

ELECTORAL COUNT ACT?

01:16

>> MR. EASTMAN ACKNOWLEDGED THAT

01:17

WAS THE CASE, EVEN WHAT HE

01:20

VIEWED AS AM MORE PALATABLE

01:21

OPTION WOULD VIOLATE SEVERAL

01:22

PROVISIONS.

01:23

>> I SAID TO HIM ARE YOU OUT OF

01:25

YOUR EFFING MIND.

01:27

I ONLY WANT TO HEAR TWO WORDS

01:31

COMING OUT OF YOUR MOUTH FROM

01:35

NOW ON -- ORDERLY TRANSITION.

01:37

>> ORDERLY TRANSITION.

01:40

THOSE DAMNING ACCOUNTS CAME FROM

01:43

PEOPLE WHO GENERALLY BACKED

01:45

DONALD TRUMP'S POLICIES BUT DID

01:48

STOP SHORT OF THE COUP EASTMAN

01:51

WAS PLOTTING ON TRUMP'S BEHALF.

01:53

A JUDGE JUST RULED EASTMAN

01:56

SHOULD BE DISBARRED, DISPELLED

01:57

FROM HIS PROFESSION AS A

01:59

LIFELONG ATTORNEY OVER HIS

02:00

CONDUCT IN THOSE PLOTS.

02:02

THE JUDGE CITING EASTMAN'S LIES

02:04

AND NEGLIGENCE RARLDING THE 2020

02:06

ELECTION TRUMP LOST AND FINDING

02:08

THE STATE BAR INVESTIGATIVE UNIT

02:09

DID PROVE EASTMAN CONSPIRED WITH

02:11

TRUMP TO OBSTRUCT A LAWFUL

02:12

FUNCTION OF THE GOVERNMENT

02:14

THROUGH THE JANUARY 6th PLOT.

02:16

EASTMAN AND ANOTHER INDICTED

02:18

TRUMP PLOTTER, JEFFREY CLARK,

02:19

ARE BOTH AT RISK OF LOSING THEIR

02:22

LAW LICENSES, AND THAT'S HUGE.

02:23

THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN SEARCHED BY

02:25

AGENTS IN THE SEPARATE FEDERAL

02:26

CASE.

02:27

YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THAT PRETTY

02:30

DRAMATIC AND UNUSUAL FOOTAGE

02:31

HERE ON YOUR SCREEN.

02:33

BEING DISBARRED FORMS A WARNING

02:35

TO OTHER LAWYERS WHO MIGHT

02:37

PONDER SIMILAR ACTIONS ON BEHALF

02:38

OF, YES, DONALD TRUMP RIGHT NOW

02:40

BUT OTHER POLITICIANS IN THE

02:40

FUTURE.

02:41

IT'S AN IMPORTANT LINE IN THE

02:44

SAND BECAUSE SOME ANTI-DEMOCRACY

02:46

LAWYERS MIGHT ARGUE, WELL, IF

02:48

THEY CAN FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO

02:52

SOMETHING THAT'S NOT TECHNICALLY

02:53

A FELONY, MAYBE THEY CAN GO

02:54

RIGHT UP TO THAT LINE.

02:57

HERE WE SEE THE BAR PROCESS IN

03:00

SEVERAL STATES SHOWING EVEN IT

03:02

LAWYERS USE THEIR KNOWLEDGE TO

03:05

BE TRICKY IT CAN STOP THEM FROM

03:07

PRACTICING LAW EVER AGAIN.

03:08

FOR MOST PEOPLE IT IS THEIR

03:10

LIFE, A MAIN SOURCE OF REVENUE

03:13

AND A BIG DEAL AND THAT IS

03:16

SEPARATE FROM WHETHER THEY ARE

03:17

FOUND TO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES.

03:19

BOTH OF THESE MEN ARE PRESUMED

03:21

TO BE INNOCENT LEGALLY AND ALSO

03:22

AWAIT CRIMINAL TRIALS.

03:23

GEORGIA WILL DETERMINE THEIR

03:25

CRIMINAL LIABILITY WHEN THEY GET

03:26

THEIR DAY IN COURT.

03:27

THE OTHER INDIVIDUAL, JEFFREY

03:29

CLARK, WHO WE'VE BEEN COVERING

03:31

WAS BACK IN COURT YESTERDAY IN A SEPARATE BUT OBVIOUSLY RELATED

03:33

SEPARATE BUT OBVIOUSLY RELATED

03:35

DISBARMENT HEARING WHERE HE JUST

03:39

STOPPED THE QUESTIONS.

03:41

>> THAT I WILL INVOKE THE FIFTH

03:43

AS TO, I WILL INVOKE EXECUTIVE

03:45

PRIVILEGE, LAW ENFORCEMENT

03:47

PRIVILEGE, DELIBERATE PROCESS

03:48

PRIVILEGE, AND ATTORNEY-CLIENT

03:49

PRIVILEGE.

03:50

THE FIFTH AMENDMENT, THE

03:52

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE, LAW

03:54

ENFORCEMENT PRIVILEGE, DELIVERY

03:56

TO PROCESS PRIVILEGE.

03:59

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND THE

04:00

OTHER THREE AND I'M TAKING THE

04:01

FIFTH.

04:02

>> AND THE OTHER THREE AND I'M

04:04

TAKING THE FIFTH.

04:05

IT'S ALMOST LIKE, HEY, I'VE GOT

04:06

SO MANY REASONS TO BE

04:07

PRIVILEGED.

04:08

AND LEGALLY HE MAY INDEED HAVE

04:09

THAT RIGHT.

04:10

FOR EXAMPLE, ONE OF THE RIGHTS

04:12

YOU'RE AFFORDED IN OUR

04:13

CONSTITUTION IS THAT IF YOU'RE

04:15

FACING POTENTIAL PROSECUTION AND

04:17

IMPRISONMENT, WHICH IS A VERY

04:18

BIG DEAL, YOU CANNOT BE FORCED

04:20

TO ANSWER QUESTIONS TO PROVIDE

04:21

TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE AGAINST

04:22

YOURSELF NOT ONLY IN THAT

04:23

PROSECUTION PROCEEDING BUT IN

04:25

OTHER RELATED JUDICIAL AND LEGAL

04:25

PROCEEDINGS.

04:26

SO HE HAS THAT RIGHT.

04:29

HERE'S THE BAD NEWS, THOUGH.

04:30

WHEN YOU CLAIM THAT RIGHT,

04:31

YOU'RE ONLY GETTING OUT OF

04:32

ANSWERING THE QUESTION.

04:34

YOU'RE NOT GETTING OUT OF BEING

04:36

DISBARRED IF THE EVIDENCE

04:36

SUPPORTS IT.

04:38

AND YOU'RE CERTAINLY NOT HELPING

04:40

YOUR DEFENSE BECAUSE IF YOU DID

04:41

HAVE WORDS TO EXPLAIN CLEARLY

04:43

WHY YOU DIDN'T COMMIT A CRIME OR

04:44

CONDUCT THAT YOU COULD BE

04:46

DISBARRED FOR, WELL, THIS WOULD

04:48

BE THE TIME TO SHARE IT.

04:50

SO THESE OFFICIALS IN THIS

04:51

PROCESS WILL DECIDE WHETHER IT

04:52

WARRANTS DISBARMENT.

04:53

BUT THERE'S A BROADER PATTERN

04:56

HERE THAT HOWEVER LONG IT TOOK

04:58

REALLY MATTERS.

04:58

AND YES, TRUMP HAS SHOWN HE

05:00

LIKES TO DELAY THINGS.

05:02

IT'S HIS FIRST AND FAVORITE

05:04

LEGAL TACTIC, AND SOMETIMES

05:05

WE'VE SHOWN WAYS IT HAS WORKED.

05:08

BUT THE DELAYS FOR THESE OTHER

05:12

CASES HAVE NOT WORKED.

05:13

THEY ARE FAILING.

05:15

CLARK AND EASTMAN JOIN FOUR

05:17

OTHER TRUMP LAWYERS FACING

05:19

DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND A LOT

05:20

MORE.

05:21

GIULIANI'S LAW LICENSE ALREADY

05:22

SUSPENDED IN NEW YORK.

05:25

HE ALSO FACES DISBARMENT IN D.C.

05:28

ELLIS, POWAL, AND CHESEBRO

05:30

CHARGED AND CONVICTED.

05:31

THEY'VE ALREADY PLED GUILTY IN

05:33

THE GEORGIA RICO CASE, AND THAT

05:34

ALSO PUTS PRESSURE ON THEIR

05:36

EFFORT TO EVER PRACTICE LAW

05:37

AGAIN.

05:38

INDEED BEING CONVICTED IS WORSE

05:40

THAN BEING DISBARRED.

05:41

SO THOSE ARE THE LAWYERS.

05:42

I'M SHOWING THAT TO YOU AND I'M

05:44

ABOUT TO SHOW YOU SOMETHING

05:46

ELSE, BUT THE LAWYERS MATTER

05:47

EXTRA BECAUSE I CAN TELL YOU

05:51

BEFORE THE LAWYERS HATCHED THE

05:53

JAN 6 PLOT, TEN YEARS AGO

05:55

JANUARY 6th WAS NOT A DATE IN

05:57

AMERICAN POLITICS OR HISTORY.

05:58

IT WAS NOT SOMETHING THE NEWS

05:59

COVERED A LOT.

06:00

IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE

06:04

LOOKED AT SOME EXTRA TIME TO DO

06:07

ANYTHING ANYTHING BECAUSE OF

06:10

COURSE BY JANUARY 6th EVERYTHING

06:12

HAS BEEN FINISHED.

06:14

IT'S BEEN REVIEW AT THE STATE

06:16

LEVEL, THE COURT LEVEL.

06:17

THERE'S NOTHING LEFT TO DO.

06:19

WHICH IS WHAT THEY DID AND THE

06:22

VIOLENCE IS ALSO

06:22

UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

06:23

YOU DON'T HAVE THE VICE

06:24

PRESIDENT COME IN AND REVERSE

06:25

THE OUTCOME OF AN ENTIRE

06:26

NATIONAL ELECTION ON JANUARY

06:26

6th.

06:27

NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE, DIDN'T

06:29

WORK THIS TIME, NOT SUPPOSED TO

06:30

HEMIIN THE FUTURE.

06:32

SHOW HOW DID THAT GET SO

06:34

POPULARIZED THAT DONALD TRUMP

06:36

LEARNED ABOUT IT AND CARED ABOUT

06:36

IT?

06:37

BECAUSE HE AIN'T NO

06:39

CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR.

06:40

HOW DID ALL THOSE PEOPLE COME

06:41

THAT DAY?

06:42

ALL OF THIS STUFF STARTED WITH

06:43

THOSE LAWYERS.

06:44

AND THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE AROUND

06:46

POLITICS WHO KNOW ABOUT POLITIC

06:48

AND MANY PEOPLE AROUND DONALD

06:49

TRUMP WHO KNOW ABOUT LYING.

06:51

BUT IT TOOK A RELATIVELY

06:53

SMALLINABLE OF LAWYERS TO ABUSE

06:54

THEIR KNOWLEDGE, TO GO BEYOND

06:56

ZEALOUS ADVOCACY FOR A CLIENT,

06:57

WHICH ISD, AND GO

06:58

INTO SOMETHING ELSE.

06:58

SO THAT'S THE LAWYERS.

06:59

THEY STARTED IT.

07:01

THEY MASTERMINDED IT.

07:02

THEY MADE JANUARY 6th A THING AT

07:06

LEAST FOR MAGA CONSPIRACY

07:07

THEORISTS.

07:08

BUT THERE'S A WHOLE LOT OF OTHER

07:11

FOLKS, KEY PLAYERS IN TRUMP'S

07:12

ORBED FACING ACCOUNTABILITY.

07:13

WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF ROOM AND

07:15

STAMPS ON THE CHART, BUT WE'RE

07:17

USING THE CHART ACCURATELY SO

07:18

I'LL WALK YOU THROUGH SOME

07:19

HIGHLIGHTS.

07:20

PETER NAVARRO IS THE FIRST TRUMP

07:22

WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL TO ACTUALLY

07:24

REPORT TO PRISON AS WE DISCUSS

07:25

THIS NEWS TONIGHT.

07:28

HE HAS NOW BEEN INCARCERATED

07:31

SINCE LAST WEEK OVER DEFYING JAN

07:33

6 INVESTIGATORS.

07:34

STEVE BANNON WAS CONVICTED ON

07:35

THE SAME CHARGES.

07:37

IF HE DOES NOT GET A JUDGE TO

07:40

INTERVENE, HE'LL ALSO REPORT TO

07:42

PRISON LIKE NAVARRO.

07:44

THERE'S AN UNKNOWN AND

07:46

UNINDICTED COCONSPIRATORTER JACK

07:48

SMITH REFERENCED TO THE JANUARY

07:50

6th CASE ALTHOUGH SO FAR THE

07:51

NAME IS NOT PUBLIC.

07:52

YOU SEE THAT IN THE LOWER RIGHT.

07:53

THERE WAS THE NUMBER ONE

07:55

OFFICIAL DURING ALL THIS, ALL

07:57

THE WAY UP AND THROUGH JANUARY

07:59

6th IN THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE,

08:00

MARK MEADOWS.

08:01

HE IS A WITNESS IN WASHINGTON

08:04

AND HE'S BEEN INDICTED FOR RICO

08:06

IN GEORGIA.

08:07

THE DOMINO'S FALLEN ALL AROUND

08:11

TRUMP WHO HIMSELF WE REVEAL HERE

08:13

FACES HIS OWN CRIMINAL TRIALS.

08:14

JUST IF YOU LOOK AT THE COUP,

08:17

PUT ASIDE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS,

08:18

PUT ASIDE THE NEW YORK BUSINESS

08:20

ISSUES OR THE CIVIL FRAUD CASE.

08:21

JUST ON THE COUP, HE HAS TWO

08:23

INDICTMENTS AND THE DAJ CASE

08:25

COULD STILL GO TO TRIAL BEFORE

08:27

THE ELECTION DEPENDING ON WHAT

08:29

THE SUPREME COURT DOES AND OTHER

08:30

THINGS.

08:30

PROSECUTORS WANT THOSE TRIALS

08:33

EVEN AMIDST THE PACKED ELECTION

08:35

YEAR, THE ARGUMENT BEING THE

08:36

FURTHER TO THE RIGHT THESE

08:37

TRIALS GO IS NOT BECAUSE OF

08:39

PROSECUTORS, IT'S BECAUSE OF

08:40

TRUMP AND THE DELAY TACTIC, SO

08:43

YOU CAN'T SIMULTANEOUSLY DELAY

08:44

THINGS AND DRAG THEM OUT FOR A

08:46

YEAR AND COMPLAIN THEY ARE CLOSE

08:48

TO ELECTION WHEN YOU OR THE

08:50

DEFENDANT MADE THEM CLOSE TO

08:51

ELECTION, THAT AT LEAST IS THE

08:53

LEGAL ARGUMENT.

08:53

I WILL RESTATE AGAIN TRUMP LIKE

08:55

THOSE OTHER DEFENDANTS I

08:56

MENTION, THOUGH, IN EACH OF

08:58

THOSE TRIALS IS LEGALLY PRESUMED

08:59

HE COULD EASILY BE ON TRUMP'S

09:00

SHORT LIST FOR A VERY POWERFUL

09:02

ROLE IN ANY NEW ADMINISTRATION

09:03

AFTER ALL HE HAD THE NUMBER ONE

09:06

ROLE OF CAMPAIGN CHAIR IN '16.

09:07

HE SERVED IN THE WHITE HOUSE AT

09:09

A HIGH LEVEL.

09:10

HE AND TRUMP HAD FALLING OUT BUT

09:12

GOT BACK TOGETHER BECAUSE TRUMP

09:13

ULTIMATELY USED PARDONING POWERS

09:14

FOR HIM.

09:15

MR. BANNON IS VERY PUBLICLY

09:17

TELLING HIS VIEWERS HE PLANS IF

09:19

HE CAN TO BE A PART OF A TRUMP

09:22

SECOND TERM WHERE POLITICAL

09:23

PROSECUTIONS AGAINST DEMOCRATS

09:25

ARE ON THE TABLE, WHERE A

09:26

PUTIN-STYLE EFFORT OF GOING

09:28

AFTER OPPONENTS FOR WHAT THEY

09:29

MIGHT HAVE DONE AN HONEST

09:31

INVESTIGATION BUT JUST WHO THEY

09:32

ARE AND A POLITICAL ATTACK.

09:34

MEANING HE BASICALLY SAYS

09:36

DEMOCRATS WILL BE IMPRISONED IN

09:39

ANY SECOND TRUMP TERM.

09:41

>> THE EVENING AFTER WE'VE WON,

09:43

THE ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT'S

09:44

GOING TO START, AND IT'S GOING

09:46

TO BE THOROUGH THIS TIME.

09:48

IT'S GOING TO BE THEY'RE GOING

09:49

TO BE IN PRISON.

09:51

YES, PRISON. >> QUOTE, THEY'RE GOING TO BE IN

09:54

>> QUOTE, THEY'RE GOING TO BE IN

09:56

PRISON, YES, PRISON.

09:59

THAT IS A SIGN TO SEND A MESSAGE

10:02

TO WAKE PEOPLE UP, TO SCARE

10:04

PEOPLE, TO INSTILL FEAR.

10:05

IT'S ALL IN PUBLIC, RIGHT?

10:07

IF IT WERE JUST A PRIVATE PLAN,

10:09

YOU MIGHT SEND PRIVATE MESSAGES

10:11

AND WRITE UP PRIVATE BLUE

10:11

PRINTS.

10:12

THAT'S A SECRETIVE APPROACH.

10:15

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT LOOKS

10:16

MORE LIKE AT LEAST AN ATTEMPT AT

10:18

AN ASPECT OF THE PUTIN PLAY BOOK

10:21

WHERE THE USE IN SINGLING OUT OF

10:23

GOVERNMENT POWER AGAINST YOUR

10:25

OPPONENTS DOESN'T JUST TAKE THEM

10:27

OFF THE TABLE OR AS IT SOMETIMES

10:30

HAS BEEN IN RUSSIA, WORSE, BUT

10:31

IT ALSO SENDS A MESSAGE TO

10:33

EVERYBODY ELSE MAYBE YOU DON'T

10:34

WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED IN THAT,

10:35

YOU DON'T WANT TO BE INVOLVED IN

10:36

THAT.

10:37

YOU WANT TO GO BACK AND LIVE

10:38

YOUR LIFE AND AVOID BEING

10:39

GROUPED IN WITH THIS GROUP OF

10:41

PEOPLE MR. BANNON SAYS ARE GOING

10:45

TO BE IN, QUOTE, YES, PRISON.

10:47

USUALLY, TRADITIONALLY IN

10:48

AMERICAN POLITICS IN EITHER

10:50

PARTY IF PEOPLE WHO WORKED AT

10:52

THE WHITE HOUSE AT THAT LEVEL,

10:55

I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE RANDOM

10:58

LOUD GADFLIES, BUD RANDOM PEOPLE

10:59

IF YOUR BOSS SAID TO THEM ARE

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Trump aidesLegal challengesUS democracyElectoral Count ActDisbarment hearingsPolitical accountabilityJanuary 6th plotConstitutional crisisPolitical trialsRule of law
日本語の要約は必要ですか?