BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga - Whistleblower Complaint🚨 FANI's Entire Teams Bad News

well tonight after more than two months

of controversy a decision may be on the

horizon in the Bonnie Willis

disqualification case you fire bombshell

new audio appears to show a

whistleblower privately warned in battle

Georgia da fonnie Willis that her top

Aid was abusing federal funds now we are

following the latest in the fton County

district attorney disqualification Saga

now in the audio Willis appears to agree

with this whistleblower and say that

she'd look into it yet a little less

than two later the staffer who raised

the concerns was fired let's take a

listen to that audio he told everybody

in front of Crystal Deonte everybody

we're going to get MacBooks we're going

to do we're going to get swag we're

going to use it for travel I said you

cannot do that it's a very very specific

Grant took me off I question Junior da

there's kids in there from out of the

the um the county all this took me off

Junior da I did not want to do it he

made it look as if I wasn't doing what I

needed to do because I questioned him

because I knew for a fact Mr cuy

respectfully did not know what he was

doing period so I respect that as your

assessment um it was clear to me that

you and Mr cuffy were not getting along

and I'm not saying that your assessment

is wrong I want you to really listen to

the words I'm saying cuy and this is my

personal opinion to one woman to another

is dangerous to your Administration Fon

County DA fonny Willis is facing a

looming deadline House Republicans in

Washington are threaten to hold her in

contempt of congress if she does not

produce documents relating to her

office's spending of federal funds well

this stems from a whistleblower

complaint alleging fonnie Willis misused

federal funds the lawyer at the center

of the attempt to remove Fon County DA

fonny Willis from the 2020 Georgia

election case testified before the state

senate committee she talked about what

exactly she says she found that she

believes should disqualify Willis well

Chris that's exactly what it does so to

be very clear what's happening here at

the State House is different from what

is happening a couple of locks away at

the Fulton County Courthouse in that

situation the judge will decide whether

or not fny Willis will stay on the case

now here at the State House what

lawmakers are doing is they are looking

into whether or not there was any misuse

of State funds and the misuse of power

for personal game those are the two

issues they're looking at here so you've

gone back and reviewed all of the Fulton

County commission's minutes in records

to see what requests were made and if

there was a resolution granting the

additional funding yes oh yes was there

ever a request for additional funding

for a special prosecutor to pursue these

election cases no there wasn't and I

knew that before um we got the District

Attorney's response but subsequently we

got a response from the district

attorney's office that said we didn't do

it we don't have to do it I'm a

constitutional officer um so their

argument was we don't have to comply

with those statutes or those rules

because she's saying um she's a

constitutional officer so she doesn't

have to get County approval she can

spend her budget however she wants then

why would she have gotten County

approval for the uh the other 55

attorneys so what I've surmised is that

was because those were staff members and

so she she C she went and asked for

additional budgetary money she needed a

higher budget so for those 55 people she

went and asked for more money because

she didn't have enough money and once

she was awarded that it's her position

now that she can spend that money

however she wants doesn't have to use

for 55 new staff she can use it for

special attorney general yes not

attorney

general essentially that that that is

their argument in their reply briefs

that they filed um in court that they

have her an authority they don't have to

comply with the county ordinances don't

have to comply with the statute um so

they don't have to comply with our state

statute that they have once they're

awarded the budget they can use that

budget however I mean how their how

their motion and I and I'm happy to send

the motion um it's public record but how

their motion argued it was if they get

$5 million they can pay that to one

person if they want um as long as the

you know because the voter's authorized

her to do that so the county their

position is the county authorizes a

budget and she can pretty much has

inherent authority to do it however even

though she specifically asked for the

money to prosecute backlogged homicide

cases in Atlanta yes okay um what's your

opinion on that you think the statute or

County procedures permit that no I do

not um and there's and I cited several

different County um County ordinances so

when I read the statute when I read 15-1

1820 and it makes sense you know it

makes sense intuitively as lawyers when

we Bill someone is reviewing our bills I

mean that that that's just you know

that's the process if you're in private

practice you know your client authorizes

your bills if you're in if you're doing

Public Defense which I've done Public

Defense I've done appointed work um you

know the the governing agency approves

my bills and they will cut them they

will regularly cut them um if they're

too high and so there's always some type

of budgetary authority that's that's

reviewing everything um so I thought it

was very strange that in this case there

isn't one um and that there's really no

oversight because it is public money so

I know that I know that it's an elected

official but it's still public money um

and I don't live in Fon County so it

would probably aggravate me more if I

did so we have the code section up that

you're referencing for prosecuting

attorneys getting additional personel

that's what Mr Wade would qualify as

correct yes so under B um that is the

that's the section that authorizes the

appointment of special counsel and it

says the manner and amount of

compensation to be paid is fixed by

either local act or by the district

attorney with the approval of the county

um and so that's where that that's our

argument that that this was not

appropriate expenditure because it did

not have County approval so our state

law requires if a DA is going to go seek

outside Council I'm going to call them

that must be approved by the County

Commission yes without a doubt good

evening carress woman and so what

provoked this request for documents to

begin with what made you think that her

office was using Federal front funds

inappropriately because we have evidence

that she has been receiving federal

funds and obviously we have oversight as

to how they're being spent being the

judici Judiciary Committee and Congress

and so it is our right determine whether

she is spending those funds

appropriately we have the same issue

with brag in New York they're using

federal funds to to engage in political

persecution and to go after political

enemies we also need to find out to what

extent she has uh corresponded with

worked with coordinated with the White

House in her efforts to to pursue this

uh this litigation against Donald Trump

and other citizens wait when you when

you send money to a DA's office now you

get sent around the country from the

Department of Justice I understand the

oversight is it just you know here's 12

million or here's 12 million spend it on

fixing the jails adding more assistant

Das I mean are you specific so I mean

because or or do you just sort of send a

check you don't you don't just send a

check they are supposed to use that

money for specific purposes and that's

one of the reasons why we have the

oversight it's just not just that they

get a blank check to do whatever they

want to do and again when we're talking

about political persecution which I

think it's very obvious in light of what

has happened over the last couple of

weeks and the the mini trial that we

that we watched play out in the court

down there addressing her relationship

her inappropriate relationship with one

of her underlings and whether that has

color colored this litigation and her

effort to prosecute Donald Trump so

again I think that we have every right

to determine whether our money is being

used inappropriately and whether she is

the conduit by which the White House is

attempting to hamstring uh President

Biden's primary political opponent are

there some specific documents you've

requested that she has not provided to

date I know that she says it's sort of a

rolling process and um I don't know if

she's dragging her feet or not but

nonetheless are there some specific

documents that you want that you think

that she's sitting on deliberately well

some of the documents that I would like

to see relate to the relationship and

the coordination and the interaction

with the White House when her uh former

Paramore uh was billing the county he

has line items in there for meeting with

white with the White House in Washington

DC for eight hours at a time I think it

would be entirely appropriate for us to

have some understanding of what what

what took place it during those meetings

and again we need to get back to the

fact or to the question of whether Joe

Biden and the White House are

coordinating in these efforts to

prosecute Donald Trump Donald Trump is

clearly not only the front runner he is

the candidate for the Republican Party

he is beating Joe Biden in all of the

polls there's one particular entry that

I have a high interest in and I I can't

figure this one out I know about the

meetings at the White House and and I

got that you have the interest in but

there's one entry in his invoices where

he said he met I think with White House

councel in Athens Georgia and for the

life of me I can't figure out I mean I

get you know going to the White House

and maybe there's some negotiation about

documents or whatever and I I I await

the answer to that but why why do you

think that what's with this Athens

Georgia meeting with the White House

Council you don't expect that one so

think that that's also very significant

we need to find out that but we also

have learned that there is an assistant

district attorney in her office who is

being paid 40 some thousand 50 some

thousand a year yet has a side business

that is he is a a a political operative

a Democrat political operative where

he's actually red in hundreds of

thousands of dollars if not more in

furthering the Democrat agenda I think

we're entitled to find out more

information about that relationship and

why he's in the office and as as you say

there were meetings with white house

councel I think we have the right to

understand what took place during those

meetings We are following a dispute

right now between Fulton County Georgia

essentially Atlanta the da here funny

Willis and her dispute with a powerful

Congressman house should diser chairman

Jim Jordan of Ohio an ardan Trump

supporter recently threatened to hold

Willis in contempt of congress for not

providing information about how the DA's

office used a Federal grant but in a def

defiant response Willis said she is

cooperating with Jordan's committee and

suggested what Jordan really wants is to

slow down her election subversion case

against Trump and others she wrote in

part nothing that you do will derail the

efforts of my staff and I bring the

election interference prosecution to

trial the Georgia case delayed for two

months by a challenge to Da fonny Willis

finally moves forward today in Atlanta

Judge Scott McAfee will hear arguments

that the charges violate Trump's Free

Speech rights under the First Amendment

Trump's lawyers say the case seeks to

criminalize political speech da Fon

Willis firing back at Republicans

seeking info about her use of federal

funds saying quote nothing you do will

derail the efforts of my staff and I to

bring election interference prosecution

to trial so that a jury of fton County

Citizens can determine the guilt or

innocence of the defendants tensions

escalating on Capitol Hill as

Congressman Jim Jordan calls on fonnie

Willis to appear before lawmakers

The embattled Fulton County district

attorney facing an ultimatum show up or

face contempt of congress if she doesn't

comply with the Congressional subpoena

Congress is trying to find out if and

how her office misused federal funds so

F Willis's office is saying that she's

innocent their office did nothing wrong

but Congressman Jim Jordan is saying

they haven't sent over enough to prove

that they're looking for yet another

slice of the pie so in a letter from we

obtains from Jim Jordan to Fanny will

his office it reads in part quote your

office unlawfully planed to use part of

a

$488,000 Federal grant earmarked for the

creation of a center of Youth

Empowerment and gang prevention to cover

frivolous unrelated expenses we know the

allegations here Center on a former

employee who said the district attorney

fired her soon after she raised concerns

about how one of their employees hoped

to use those Federal grant money for

things outside

of the scope of that Federal grant the

youth violence and gang prevention

program the congressman Jim Jordan he's

emphasizing the seriousness of the

matter he's saying that failure to

adhere to The subpoena would result in

severe

consequences as part of that letter he

says quote the committee expects that

you will produce all responsive

Documents To The subpoena and the

categories prioritized by the committee

if you fail to do so the committee will

consider taking further action such as

the invocation of contempt of congress

proceedings and that's what's really new

in this story here so we've reached out

to Willis's office in response for this

subpoena we have not heard back from her

yet we'll update you when we do but when

this subpoena was initially sent out

back in February February 2nd she sent

us this this statement she says in part

quote these false allegations are

included in baseless litigation filed by

a holdover employee from the previous

administration who was terminated for

cause the courts have ruled they found

no merit in these claims we expect the

same result in any pending litigation

Mary right now it's still unclear

whether or not these federal funds in

question were used or misused improperly

or not let's talk about this Georgia

case and we know this Fanny Willis looks

unbelievably compromised it looks like

she's admitted her relationships with

Nathan Wade who whose credentials are

weak to be a lead prosecutor on a former

president United States Ates they're

going to be questioning today lot of his

expenses that he was paid and were they

used to go on vacation together look at

some of these stuff you probably can't

see it there $800 for nappy Valley Nappa

Valley Hotel 3,000 for a Royal Caribbean

vacation close to that no Norwegian crws

on and on and on one flowers all these

bills are they related to the money he's

getting because of the job she gave them

and what does it mean for the case yeah

she used taxpayer dollars to to help

Nathan Wade who spent it in all kinds of

ways but he also used that money to go

after president Trump for goodness sake

so yeah that I think she's compromised

and back up a second she charged

president Trump and 18 other people and

was looking to charge three United

States senators she put this out