BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga - FANI'S Last minute change after Attorney Testimony🚨

US Immigration
9 Apr 202430:51

Summary

TLDRFulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis has admitted to a personal relationship with Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade, who was appointed to handle the election interference case against former President Donald Trump. This revelation has sparked controversy and legal implications, with Willis's continued involvement in the case being questioned. The attorney representing Wade's estranged wife has stated that evidence suggests a romantic relationship between Willis and Wade, which could impact the divorce proceedings and the election interference case. The situation is complex and ongoing, with potential ramifications for all parties involved.

Takeaways

  • 🚨 Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis has admitted to a personal relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she appointed to manage the election interference case against former President Donald Trump.
  • 🔍 The relationship between Willis and Wade is considered to have prejudiced the case, leading to a last-minute change in the proceedings.
  • 🤝 Legal expert opinions are being sought to understand the impact of this revelation on the election interference case.
  • 📜 A 176-page court filing by Willis details the relationship's timeline, stating it began in 2020, after Wade's appointment as special prosecutor.
  • 🎯 The attorney representing Nathan Wade's estranged wife is conducting interviews and seeking further information on the case.
  • 🏛️ The judge in the RICO case related to election fraud in Georgia is considering gagging orders for involved parties due to public statements.
  • 🔄 Fulton County District Attorney's office is requesting the Georgia Court of Appeals to uphold a judge's disqualification ruling.
  • 💡 Former President Trump and his codefendant are seeking to overturn Judge McAfee's ruling, potentially leading to the dismissal of the case or removal of Willis and her team.
  • 📝 The divorce proceedings between Joyce and Nathan Wade have resulted in a temporary settlement, with unusual circumstances surrounding the financial arrangements after two years.
  • 🤔 The divorce attorney, Andrea Hastings, emphasizes the importance of uncovering the truth behind the financial situation and the potential romantic relationship's impact on asset division.
  • 🔍 Subpoenas and open records requests have been issued to Fannie Willis in an attempt to gather evidence of the relationship and financial information.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue that Fulton County District Attorney冯妮·威利斯 admitted to?

    -冯妮·威利斯 admitted to having a personal relationship with Nathan Wade, the outside prosecutor she appointed to manage the election interference case against former President Donald Trump.

  • How did the relationship between 冯妮·威利斯 and Nathan Wade potentially affect the case?

    -The relationship between 冯妮·威利斯 and Nathan Wade is believed to have prejudiced the election interference case, leading to concerns about the impartiality and integrity of the proceedings.

  • What was the outcome of the court filing by 冯妮·威利斯 regarding her relationship with Nathan Wade?

    -In the court filing, 冯妮·威利斯 acknowledged that she and Nathan Wade developed a romantic relationship in 2020, but she claimed there was no relationship prior to his appointment as special prosecutor.

  • What is the status of the divorce case between Joyce Wade and Nathan Wade?

    -As of the interview, there is a settlement agreement incorporating terms for temporary alimony and temporary attorney's fees, but the divorce case is still ongoing with a final disposition not yet reached.

  • Why did the attorney for Joyce Wade issue a subpoena to 冯妮·威利斯?

    -The attorney for Joyce Wade issued a subpoena to 冯妮·威利斯 to gather information about the nature of the relationship between 冯妮·威利斯 and Nathan Wade, as it is relevant to the divorce case and the equitable division of assets.

  • What was the response from 冯妮·威利斯 to the subpoena?

    -冯妮·威利斯 tried to quash the subpoena, claiming that Joyce Wade was using the legal process to harass and embarrass her and that it was obstructing and interfering with an ongoing criminal prosecution.

  • What evidence does the attorney for Joyce Wade have to support the allegation of a romantic relationship between 冯妮·威利斯 and Nathan Wade?

    -The attorney has documentary evidence, including credit card statements showing flights booked for both individuals to places like San Francisco and Miami, suggesting non-business travel together.

  • How has the public perception of the case impacted Joyce Wade?

    -Joyce Wade has faced criticism and misunderstanding, which has taken a toll on her身心健康. She has health issues that have gone untreated due to lack of access to resources.

  • What is the next step in the divorce case between Joyce Wade and Nathan Wade?

    -The next step is to receive a list of documents from Nathan Wade and attempt to mediate the case within 45 days. If mediation is unsuccessful, they will proceed to the next phase of litigation.

  • What is the relevance of the potential romantic relationship between 冯妮·威利斯 and Nathan Wade to the divorce case?

    -Adultery is grounds for divorce in Georgia and is also a factor for the court to consider in equitably dividing assets. The relationship is relevant to determining the financial implications and any dissipation of assets due to the alleged affair.

  • What is the current stance of the Fulton County District Attorney's office regarding the election interference case?

    -The Fulton County District Attorney's office is asking the Georgia Court of Appeals to let the judge's disqualification ruling stand, which allows 冯妮·威利斯 to remain on the case as long as Nathan Wade steps down.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Investigation into Personal Relationship Affecting Court Case

District Attorney Fannie Willis admitted to a personal relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she appointed to handle the election interference case against former President Donald Trump. This revelation has led to concerns about the case's integrity and calls for a review of the circumstances. The attorney representing the estranged wife of Nathan Wade, Andrea Hastings, is seeking to depose Willis to gather more information on the relationship's impact on the case. The case has become complex, with various legal maneuvers and public statements adding to the confusion.

05:03

📜 Legal Proceedings and Public Statements

The legal proceedings surrounding the election interference case and the RICO case in Georgia are mired in controversy. Judge Scott McAfee has allowed Fannie Willis to remain on the election interference case despite the personal relationship with Nathan Wade, who has been removed from the case. Public statements by Willis, particularly those made in church, have been criticized as inappropriate by the judge, leading to potential gag orders. The defense teams are looking to file motions to gag Willis, who continues to make public statements that could influence the case.

10:05

🤝 Divorce Case and Allegations of Romantic Relationship

The divorce case between Joyce and Nathan Wade has taken a national spotlight due to allegations of a romantic relationship between District Attorney Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade. Attorney Andrea Hastings has subpoenaed Willis to testify in the divorce proceedings, seeking evidence of the relationship's impact on the division of assets. The discovery of travel records indicating non-business trips together has fueled these allegations. Hastings maintains that the relationship is relevant to the divorce case and the equitable distribution of assets.

15:06

💼 Financial Discrepancies and Deception Allegations

Attorney Andrea Hastings expresses concerns over Nathan Wade's financial disclosures in the divorce case. Despite Wade's significant income as a special prosecutor, there is a lack of transparency regarding his financial状况. Hastings accuses Wade of being deceptive and not forthcoming with information, making it difficult to ascertain the true state of the couple's finances. The pursuit of financial records and the tracking of funds related to the alleged relationship between Wade and Willis is a central focus of the investigation.

20:09

📝 Court Rulings and Future Legal Strategies

The Fulton County attorney's office is requesting the Georgia court of appeals to uphold Judge Scott McAfee's ruling that allowed Fannie Willis to remain on the election interference case after Nathan Wade's removal. The defense team is seeking to overturn this ruling, potentially leading to Willis's removal from the case or the dismissal of the indictment. The outcome of the appeals process could have significant implications for the ongoing legal proceedings and the strategies employed by both sides.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Fulton County District Attorney

The Fulton County District Attorney is a public official responsible for prosecuting criminal cases within Fulton County. In the context of the video, this role is held by冯nie Willis, who is involved in a controversy due to her personal relationship with Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor appointed to manage the election interference case against former President Donald Trump.

💡Election Interference Case

The Election Interference Case refers to the legal proceedings against former President Donald Trump and others, alleging their involvement in interference with the 2020 U.S. presidential election. This case is significant due to its high-profile nature and the political implications it carries.

💡Special Prosecutor

A Special Prosecutor is an attorney appointed to conduct a criminal investigation or prosecution, often in cases of conflict of interest or high-profile matters. In this context, Nathan Wade is the Special Prosecutor for the Election Interference Case, and his impartiality is under question due to his relationship with 冯nie Willis.

💡Personal Relationship

A personal relationship refers to a private or intimate connection between two individuals. In the video, the personal relationship between 冯nie Willis and Nathan Wade is significant because it potentially biases the handling of the Election Interference Case, leading to calls for recusal or disqualification.

💡Recusal

Recusal is the act of a judge or prosecutor voluntarily stepping down from a case due to a perceived or actual conflict of interest. In this context, there are calls for 冯nie Willis to recuse herself from the Election Interference Case due to her personal relationship with Nathan Wade, the Special Prosecutor.

💡Disqualification

Disqualification refers to the legal process of removing a judge or prosecutor from a case due to a demonstrated or perceived conflict of interest. In the video, the term is used in relation to the potential removal of 冯nie Willis from the Election Interference Case because of her relationship with Nathan Wade.

💡Divorce Proceedings

Divorce proceedings are the legal processes involved in the dissolution of a marriage. In the video, the divorce proceedings of Nathan Wade and his estranged wife have become intertwined with the Election Interference Case due to allegations of a romantic relationship between Wade and 冯nie Willis.

💡Credit Card Statements

Credit card statements are detailed records of all transactions made using a credit card. In the context of the video, credit card statements are being used as evidence to support allegations of a romantic relationship between 冯nie Willis and Nathan Wade, as they show joint travel and expenses.

💡Temporary Alimony

Temporary alimony is a court-ordered payment made by one spouse to another during the pendency of a divorce proceeding. It is intended to support the spouse who is not earning as much while the divorce is being finalized. In the video, a consent order has been established for temporary alimony and attorney's fees, indicating the financial arrangements during the ongoing divorce proceedings.

💡Gag Order

A gag order is a legal directive issued by a court or judge prohibiting involved parties in a legal proceeding from making public statements about the case. In the video, the defense teams are considering filing a motion to issue a gag order against 冯nie Willis due to her continued public statements about the case.

Highlights

Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis admits to a personal relationship with Nathan Wade, the prosecutor she appointed to manage the election interference case against former President Donald Trump.

The relationship between Willis and Wade is believed to have prejudiced the case against former President Trump.

This revelation comes as a last-minute change in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Willis and Wade developed their relationship since 2020, but there was no relationship prior to his appointment as special prosecutor.

The attorney representing Nathan Wade's estranged wife is speaking with an investigator, revealing new details about the case.

A 176-page court filing by Willis discusses her relationship with Wade and its potential impact on the election interference case.

Fonnie Willis is also involved in the RICO case for election fraud in Georgia, facing potential gag orders from the judge due to her public statements.

The defense teams in the RICO case are preparing to file a motion to gag Willis, critical of her public statements blaming her race for issues she's faced.

The Fulton County District Attorney's office is asking the Georgia Court of Appeals to let a judge's disqualification ruling stand.

Former President Trump and his codefendant are seeking to overturn Judge McAfee's ruling, potentially leading to the dismissal of the case or removal of Willis and her team.

Attorney Andrea Hastings discusses the divorce proceedings of Joyce and Nathan Wade, revealing that a settlement has been reached for temporary alimony and attorney's fees.

Hastings emphasizes the unusual length of time taken to establish temporary financial arrangements in the divorce case.

The divorce case was brought into the national spotlight when Hastings subpoenaed District Attorney Fannie Willis to sit for a deposition.

Willis attempted to quash the subpoena, claiming that the legal process was being used to harass and embarrass her.

Hastings expresses astonishment at Willis's assertion and states that it felt like a threat of criminal prosecution.

Credit card statements show flights booked for Wade and Willis, indicating trips to San Francisco and Miami, which are not for business purposes.

Hastings confirms that there is documentary evidence suggesting a romantic relationship between Willis and Wade.

The divorce case is expected to move forward with mediation attempts within 45 days, followed by further litigation if necessary.

Joyce Wade is described as an incredible woman who is struggling due to the impact of the ongoing legal proceedings.

Adultery is grounds for divorce in Georgia and a factor for the court to consider in the equitable division of assets, making the potential relationship between Willis and Wade highly relevant to the divorce case.

Nathan Wade's role as a special prosecutor and his earnings from it are central to the financial investigation in the divorce case.

Hastings expresses concerns over Wade's lack of transparency and potential deceptions regarding financial information.

Transcripts

00:00

in the last 3 hours fton County district

00:02

attorney fonnie Willis admitted to a

00:04

personal relationship with an outside

00:06

prosecutor she appointed to manage the

00:08

election interference case against

00:10

former president Donald Trump

00:12

relationship between her and Wade had

00:13

prejudiced the case this is a last

00:16

minute change the attorney representing

00:18

special prosecutor Nathan Wade's EST

00:19

strange wife is speaking with

00:21

investigator Zack Merchant and a 176

00:24

page Court filing Willis said she and

00:26

Nathan Wade developed a relationship in

00:29

202 to but that there was no

00:31

relationship prior to his appointment as

00:33

special prosecutor we'll have more on

00:36

this story including one legal expert's

00:38

take on the impact on the election

00:40

interference case there's another case

00:42

that's a big mess and that's fonnie

00:43

Willis the RICO case uh for the election

00:46

fraud issue down in in Georgia uh she's

00:50

going through yet another set of

00:52

circumstances right the judge wants to

00:54

gag her the judge do well the defense

00:56

teams are going to file a motion to to

00:59

gag her she continues to make public

01:01

statements now if you'll remember in the

01:02

judge's decision on the disqualification

01:04

issue in which she was kept on the case

01:07

but her but Nathan Wade was kicked off

01:08

the case the judge made a comment about

01:10

gagging her that that motion wasn't

01:12

before the court but the judge was very

01:14

critical of the public statements she

01:16

made the ones in church where she blamed

01:18

her race on on the problems that she's

01:21

had and and he called them inappropriate

01:23

so he's ready I think to uh issue a gag

01:25

order he just needs a motion before the

01:27

court to do so so today the Fulton

01:29

County District Attorney office is

01:30

asking the Georgia court of appeals to

01:32

let a judge's disqualification ruling

01:35

stand what specific remedies are former

01:37

president Trump and his codefendant

01:39

looking for right now they want to see

01:40

judge McAfee's ruling overturn now what

01:42

that could include is Da Willis and her

01:44

team off the case or the indictment

01:46

dismissed altogether the attorney

01:48

representing special prosecutor Nathan

01:50

Wade's EST stranged wife is speaking

01:52

with investigator Zack Merchant it is

01:54

her first sitdown interview since their

01:55

divorce catapulted into the national

01:57

Spotlight it's good to go through a

01:59

little bit of background here because it

02:01

has been a complex past few weeks the

02:04

attorney Andrea Hastings subpoena Fulton

02:06

County district attorney fonny Willis

02:08

earlier this month seeking to depose her

02:11

in Wade's ongoing divorce proceedings

02:13

alleging Willis had a romantic

02:15

relationship with Nathan Wade whom she

02:18

appointed as special prosecutor in the

02:20

ongoing criminal case in Fulton County

02:23

against former president Donald Trump

02:25

and others in the interview we asked

02:27

Hastings the question many of you are

02:30

asking what proof do you have to support

02:33

the allegation that da Fon Willis and

02:36

Nathan Wade had a romantic relationship

02:39

where does the divorce case between

02:41

Joyce and Wade and Nathan Wade stand as

02:43

of today as of today we have a

02:46

settlement a consent order incorporating

02:49

a settlement as to Temporary alimony and

02:52

temporary attorney St to somebody who's

02:55

not an attorney what what does that mean

02:57

so it's in any case it's It's Not

03:00

Unusual for us to set up temporary

03:02

Financial Arrangements in a case what's

03:04

unusual about this situation is that

03:06

it's been over 2 years and we're just

03:09

now establishing a temporary Financial

03:11

Arrangement temporary support for my

03:13

client who is not the earning spouse so

03:18

and that's because of how this case is

03:19

gone um but it's it's a normal part of

03:22

the process what's unusual is that it's

03:24

taking this long you're a divorce

03:26

attorney how long have you worked in in

03:28

family law in divorce law I've been in

03:31

family law since

03:33

2003 have you ever handled a case quite

03:37

like this

03:38

one

03:41

no no I well as far as the the facts go

03:45

of the case it's there's not a lot

03:47

unusual about it the circumstances

03:49

surrounding the case that's what makes

03:51

it unusual elaborate on that a little

03:53

bit for

03:54

me well um you know when we started this

03:59

case when Joyce Wade hired me we had no

04:03

idea about any of the circumstances

04:06

surrounding the case we certainly had no

04:08

idea that Nathan Wade had accepted a

04:10

position as a special prosecutor so from

04:13

my perspective I was approaching it like

04:15

any other divorce case I had a a wife

04:18

who'd been married for almost 25 years

04:20

to a husband a apparently successful

04:22

attorney so we were going to undergo

04:24

Discovery and all the things we normally

04:26

do um and then as we started to peel

04:29

back the onion and and questions weren't

04:32

answered and things didn't make sense

04:34

that's when it turned into something

04:35

else you mentioned that when you came on

04:39

to the case it was your understanding

04:41

that uh you didn't know that Mr Wade was

04:46

working as a special prosecutor correct

04:49

there have been people who've who've

04:50

caught that you mentioned it in some

04:52

filing seeking additional Discovery

04:53

materials over the more than two years

04:55

now that this case has been proceeding

04:57

and there have been folks who've

04:59

wondered how that could be um so I just

05:03

want to put it to you why didn't you

05:06

know that Mr Wade was a special

05:08

prosecutor until at least somewhat

05:10

fairly far along in the process well I

05:13

can tell you

05:14

that to the extent that it was public

05:17

knowledge it wasn't in any public Circle

05:20

that I was a part of or that Joyce was a

05:22

part of and we did not actually learn

05:27

that he was the special prosecutor until

05:29

around the time that the indictments

05:31

came out and in Discovery we ask about

05:36

sources of income with specificity and

05:38

the answer that we received repeatedly

05:41

was Nathan J Wade PC so we didn't have

05:46

any

05:47

information objective information that

05:49

would tell us anything about that until

05:52

it became a source of public information

05:56

and that's when we started down the hole

05:58

of trying to get information with regard

06:01

to his income those were the things that

06:02

weren't making sense he didn't seem to

06:05

have very much in the way of income but

06:07

he seemed to have a lot of money at his

06:10

disposal and when we learned this that's

06:12

when we started doing subpoenas to fton

06:14

County um and open records requests to

06:17

figure out what on Earth is going on you

06:19

mentioned something that I want to kind

06:20

of circle back on the open records

06:22

requests and The subpoena I think the

06:25

divorce case really got dragged into the

06:27

national Spotlight when you subpoena

06:30

bton County district attorney fonny

06:32

Willis to sit for a deposition in this

06:34

case and I want to spend a little bit of

06:36

time talking about that and let's start

06:39

here da Willis tried to quash that

06:42

subpoena um there was a hearing the

06:45

judge stayed The subpoena uh at the

06:48

time before that hearing da Willis filed

06:51

a motion in response trying to quash The

06:53

subpoena and she wrote that your client

06:56

was using the legal process to harass

06:59

ass and embarrass the district attorney

07:01

and I'm quoting here she said in her

07:03

filing that doing so was obstructing and

07:06

interfering with an ongoing criminal

07:08

prosecution what did you make of that

07:10

when you read it in her

07:14

filing I was

07:17

astounded

07:19

that she would make that type of

07:22

assertion against an individual another

07:26

member of the bar um I understand

07:30

intellectually what she was trying to do

07:34

but I don't take too kindly to people

07:38

threatening my clients or myself and

07:42

that's what it felt like to me it went

07:44

too

07:45

far you took it as a threat of criminal

07:48

prosecution correct that if we proceeded

07:51

with this

07:53

deposition that we would be prosecuted

07:57

criminally for it that's how I took it

08:00

did you you raised that concern in a

08:04

response filing of your own um did you

08:07

ever hear a response from da Willis

08:10

about

08:11

that let's talk about the subpoena

08:15

specifically you wrote in a motion and

08:19

this is where uh we have to peel back a

08:22

little bit from the legal le as best we

08:23

can although you know we'll hash it all

08:26

out but we we want to be sort of as as

08:28

clear about all this as we can because

08:29

there's a lot of motions and counter

08:31

motions and oh yes um and that's that's

08:33

the nature of these things but you wrote

08:35

in one of your motions in support of the

08:37

subpoena to get da Willis to sit for

08:39

that deposition you wrote that you

08:43

wanted to depose her to gather

08:45

information about the nature of the

08:46

relationship between da Fon Willis and

08:49

Nathan Wade and in that filing you wrote

08:52

that it was your belief that the two of

08:54

them were engaged in a romantic

08:56

relationship correct what kind of proof

08:59

do you have to support the notion that

09:02

Mr Wade and da Willis were engaged in a

09:05

romantic

09:07

relationship so let me say one thing

09:10

about the subpoena when we first issued

09:12

the subpoena we didn't list the reason

09:16

for the deposition and we did that on

09:19

purpose um it was only after her filing

09:22

that when she demanded to know why we

09:25

were going to ask her questions that we

09:27

reissued The subpoena with that

09:28

information on it I just think that I

09:31

just want that out there um but we

09:34

received documents like I said I did the

09:37

um sorry I'm jumping around I did the

09:39

open records request this was late fall

09:42

and once I received those documents I

09:44

issued a formal subpoena for evidentiary

09:47

reasons and I received those in November

09:50

it was shortly as soon as I received

09:53

those we filed a motion for a temporary

09:54

hearing because I had information about

09:56

money I did not have information about a

09:59

Rel relationship at that point and it

10:02

wasn't until we received a handful of

10:05

documents from Nathan Wade on the Friday

10:07

before Christmas December 22nd that I

10:10

had information that

10:12

indicated with a reasonable degree of

10:15

certainty that there was definitely more

10:17

than a boss employee relationship

10:20

between the two of them when you say

10:24

information help me understand what that

10:27

is is the natural question of anybody

10:28

who watches this is going to be be okay

10:30

what was it so you say you obtained

10:33

information what information did you

10:35

obtain what proof did that show to you

10:38

that there was a relationship between da

10:39

Willis and Mr wne I received documents

10:43

that indicated as you've seen um that

10:47

they have traveled together ostensibly

10:50

not for business purposes I'm I can't

10:52

think of a business reason for them to

10:53

have gone to Aruba or to Napa Valley and

10:58

we've issued subpoenas as a result of

11:00

those documents that we received from Mr

11:02

Wade that have gone

11:06

further when you say gone further the

11:08

latest that I've seen in the public

11:11

record so far are the exhibits attached

11:13

to your response to the emergency motion

11:15

seeking to quash The subpoena by da

11:17

Willis uh there were reported credit

11:19

card statements in there that showed

11:21

some flights booked um for both Mr Wade

11:24

and da Willis you say that you've

11:27

obtained new information that goes

11:28

further

11:30

can you elaborate on

11:35

that I don't know if I should at this

11:41

point we have let me let me answer it

11:44

this way and tell me we have issued

11:47

subpoenas based on specific items

11:50

contained in those documents and we've

11:52

received information back that gives

11:55

more detail with regards to what we

11:57

learned in those credit cards

12:00

statements can you can I actually show

12:03

you and and

12:04

maybe you can help me understand the

12:06

credit card statements better I have

12:08

them here um and sometimes I it's I'm a

12:11

visual learner sometimes absolutely and

12:14

one of the things that I noticed is that

12:16

the credit card statements them

12:18

themselves show flights to San Francisco

12:21

and Miami booked right um on behalf of

12:25

passengers named Nathan J Wade and fonny

12:28

Willis but you in your filing and in our

12:30

conversation here have also mentioned

12:31

trips to Aruba and other places can you

12:35

point to where in these credit card

12:37

statements those pieces of evidence come

12:39

up I don't think that

12:42

the um the Aruba trip is actually in

12:45

these credit card statements it was a

12:47

part of the cruise that they went on um

12:50

the Royal Caribbean cruise that's in

12:53

here uh they flew in and out of Miami

12:56

and from Miami they flew to Aruba okay

12:59

and it's your belief that that was a

13:03

romantic getaway

13:06

yes did joyn Wade have a sense that I

13:11

can take this back from you did Joyce

13:13

and Wade have a sense that this was

13:14

happening she did

13:18

not one of the things that some folks

13:22

have asked about and I want to make sure

13:25

you have a chance

13:26

to elaborate on it however you choose

13:30

um there's a timing question so the

13:34

subpoena to Da Willis to testify in the

13:36

ongoing divorce case came on January 8th

13:39

of this year on the same day a defendant

13:43

in the ongoing criminal case in Fulton

13:45

County filed a motion to disqualify da

13:49

Willis also alleging that da Willis was

13:52

engaged in a romantic relationship with

13:54

Nathan Wade so on the same day two

13:57

separate allegations of the same

13:59

romantic relationship there are those

14:02

who've wondered whether you coordinated

14:06

efforts with anybody who's seeking to

14:09

disqualify da Willis from the criminal

14:11

case in Fulton County to those people

14:14

what would you say I would say

14:15

absolutely not we didn't know about a

14:20

potential romantic relationship between

14:22

Nathan Wade and Vonnie Willis until

14:26

immediately Before Christmas when we

14:28

came back after the first of a year we

14:30

prepared and issued the subpoena we were

14:32

actually trying to serve her the week

14:34

before and we were not able to perfect

14:37

service we finally perfected service on

14:40

the eth which I understand I've learned

14:42

since that um because this question has

14:45

been asked of me that apparently that

14:47

was a deadline in the criminal case for

14:49

filing motions um I had no idea about

14:54

that there certainly was no coordinated

14:56

effort what I can say is that adult

14:59

adultery is not only a grounds for

15:01

divorce in Georgia but it's also a

15:03

factor that the court considers in

15:05

Equitable division of property so as

15:09

soon as I received information

15:10

indicating this potential relationship I

15:13

went after it as for other people and

15:16

the timing of when they did what they

15:18

did what they were looking at and where

15:20

they got their information I can't speak

15:22

to that a total

15:26

coincidence I don't generally believe in

15:28

coincidence but in this case it

15:30

literally happened on the same

15:33

day how has this case impacted

15:41

joyin so joyin

15:44

is she is an incredible woman she's kind

15:48

she's sweet she has some health issues

15:51

that have gone untreated um because she

15:54

has not had access to resources to to

15:59

take care of herself and needless to say

16:01

in the last few weeks as all of this has

16:04

gone on it's it's taken a definite toll

16:07

on her she's she's definitely

16:11

struggling I know the terms of the

16:13

consent order have not been made public

16:16

um is Joyce ly satisfied with the

16:21

current outcome of the case and and

16:23

that's a strange phrase I say current

16:24

outcome but this

16:26

is not a final disposition correct is

16:29

she satisfied with where things stand

16:33

now I think that I can without revealing

16:37

any confidences say that yes she's very

16:40

pleased with where things stand at the

16:41

moment can you

16:44

share anything about the terms of the

16:47

current

16:53

agreement beyond the fact that we

16:55

established temporary support and and

16:59

that Mr Wade is paying attorney's fees

17:02

and litigation

17:03

expenses I

17:06

can't do you have a sense of when a

17:08

final disposition will be reached in

17:10

this case it's been a two-year long

17:12

process

17:14

now Nathan Wade has a list of documents

17:16

that he has to get to us

17:20

and after we receive those

17:23

documents we are going to try to mediate

17:26

the case within 45 days and if we are