“How DARE You Call Me A Racist!” Piers Morgan vs Cornel West vs Cenk Uygur

Piers Morgan Uncensored
1 May 202444:57

Summary

TLDRThe transcript captures a heated debate on the protests at Columbia University and other campuses, focusing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The discussion involves accusations of bias, with participants arguing about the portrayal of the situation in Gaza and the actions of protesters on campus. The conversation touches on issues of free speech, the role of the media, and the responsibility of universities in addressing student concerns. Tensions rise as the participants challenge each other's perspectives, with allegations of racism and propaganda being thrown around. The debate concludes with a commitment to continue seeking solutions for the conflict and a plea for understanding and empathy towards all parties involved.

Takeaways

  • 🗣️ The debate revolves around protests at Columbia University and the broader implications of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on campuses.
  • 🏛️ There are allegations of vandalism and harassment at Columbia's Hamilton Hall, with claims that the protesters were violent and disruptive.
  • 🚨 Reports suggest that police have moved to eject students from Hamilton Hall, highlighting a clash between law enforcement and student protesters.
  • 🤔 The conversation brings up the question of where the line is drawn between free speech and unacceptable behavior during protests.
  • 📢 Claims that some protesters are using anti-Semitic rhetoric and symbols, leading to accusations of promoting hate speech.
  • 🤷‍♂️ There is disagreement over whether the actions of the protesters constitute terrorism or are legitimate acts of resistance against perceived oppression.
  • 👮‍♂️ The role of the police and university administration in handling the protests is questioned, with some arguing their response is heavy-handed.
  • 📈 The discussion touches on the issue of double standards, with references to how different groups and causes are treated within the context of protests and free speech.
  • 🌎 The conversation also expands to include the global perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the impact of this on the protests.
  • 🚫 There are calls for condemnation of violence on all sides, with some accusing the media and others of being biased in their coverage and responses to the protests.
  • 📚 The importance of academic freedom and the role of universities in fostering open debate are highlighted, with concerns expressed over potential suppression of viewpoints.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?

    -The main issue discussed is the protests at Columbia University and other campuses in support of Gaza, the reactions to these protests, and the broader implications regarding free speech, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and accusations of anti-Semitism.

  • Why is there a debate about free speech in this context?

    -The debate about free speech arises because some argue that the protests and chants, such as 'from the river to the sea,' could be seen as promoting violence or anti-Semitic sentiments, while others claim they are expressions of political opinion protected under the First Amendment.

  • What does the term 'intifada' mean in Arabic?

    -The term 'intifada' in Arabic means shaking off, and it is used in the context of uprisings or resistance against oppression, not exclusively related to the Palestinian struggle.

  • What accusations are being made against the protesters at Columbia University?

    -Accusations against the protesters include vandalism, trespassing, harassment of Jewish students and faculty, and potentially holding people against their will after breaking into a building.

  • What is the counter-argument made by the pro-Palestinian activist regarding the accusations of anti-Semitism?

    -The counter-argument is that accusations of anti-Semitism are often used to silence pro-Palestinian activists and that many Jewish students and organizations are, in fact, supporting the protests and standing against the actions of the Israeli government.

  • Why did the police move to eject students from Hamilton Hall at Columbia University?

    -null

  • What historical event is mentioned in relation to the protests at Columbia University?

    -The occupation of Hamilton Hall in 1968 by students protesting South African apartheid is mentioned as a historical event, drawing parallels to the current protests.

  • What is the position of the Fox News contributor on the issue of free speech at universities?

    -The Fox News contributor argues for a First Amendment absolutist position, stating that all speech, even if it's considered hate speech, should be protected under the Constitution, and the government should not decide what is and is not allowed.

  • What concerns are raised about the handling of the protests by the university administrations and the police?

    -Concerns are raised that the university administrations and the police are being used to suppress peaceful protests, with instances of violence by the NYPD against protesters, and accusations of limiting freedom of speech and press.

  • What is the argument made by the pro-Palestinian activist regarding the chanting of 'from the river to the sea'?

    -The argument is that the chant is not inherently anti-Semitic and is a call for resistance against oppression, and that the context of the Palestinian struggle is often misunderstood by those who accuse the chant of promoting the eradication of Israel.

  • How does the debate reflect the broader tensions in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

    -The debate reflects the broader tensions by showcasing the differing perspectives on the conflict, including the legitimacy of protests, the impact of historical events on current opinions, the role of free speech in political discourse, and the complexities of addressing accusations of anti-Semitism.

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ Controversial Views on Gaza Conflict

The speaker expresses strong opinions about the situation in Gaza, criticizing the framing of the issue as purely Israeli propaganda. They discuss the harassment of Jewish students and the complexity of the situation, including the actions of protesters at American universities, the demand for humanitarian aid, and the broader implications for community and student safety. The conversation touches on the volatile nature of the protests and the difficulty in addressing the underlying issues.

05:01

🤔 Questioning the Support for Violent Uprisings

The paragraph delves into a contentious conversation about the use of the term 'Intifada', the harassment of Jewish students, and the vandalism associated with the protests. The discussion becomes heated as the speaker defends the actions of pro-Palestinian activists and criticizes the violence perpetrated by authorities against protesters. The dialogue also addresses accusations of anti-Semitism and the speaker's stance against it, while also highlighting the importance of understanding the context behind the slogans and actions of the protesters.

10:02

📢 Free Speech and the Debate on Campus Protests

This section focuses on the issue of free speech in the context of campus protests. It contrasts the government's stance on free speech with the actions taken to limit it, particularly regarding criticism of Israel. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the First Amendment and the potential dangers of allowing the government to decide what constitutes acceptable speech. It also touches on the tension between supporting free speech and opposing certain forms of expression, such as those that may be associated with hate speech or terrorism.

15:03

🏛️ The哥伦比亚 University Protests and the IDF

The speaker condemns the harassment of Jewish students and discusses the protests at Colombia University. They argue against the intimidation of Jewish students for the actions of the Israeli government. The paragraph also addresses the broader context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, including the deaths of journalists and the violence in Gaza. There is a debate about the value of different lives and the accusations of racism in the framing of the conflict.

20:06

🤝 Addressing the Conflict Through Dialogue and Amendment

The paragraph emphasizes the need to separate personal feelings about speech and the issue from government involvement. It discusses the potential consequences of allowing the government to regulate speech, including the possibility of silencing certain viewpoints. The speaker advocates for a clear distinction between personal opinions and the protection of free speech rights, suggesting that anti-Semitic views should not be conflated with support for the First Amendment.

25:08

🕵️‍♂️ Infiltrating the Protest Camp: A Firsthand Account

The speaker describes their experience of infiltrating a pro-Palestinian protest camp at UCLA, highlighting the conditions within the camp and the behavior of the protesters. They claim to have witnessed hate speech and violent tendencies among the protesters, leading to concerns about the safety of journalists and the integrity of the protest movement. The narrative suggests a need for transparency and accountability within the protest camps.

30:08

👨‍🏫 Academic Freedom and the Role of Universities

This section discusses the role of universities in the context of the protests, with a focus on the actions of the administration and the police. The speaker argues against the characterization of the protests as violent and instead points to the actions of authorities as the source of conflict. They also discuss the historical context of university activism and the importance of dialogue and transparency in addressing the concerns of students.

35:09

🌎 Global Perspectives on the Israel-Palestine Conflict

The paragraph touches on the global implications of the Israel-Palestine conflict, with a focus on the role of the media and the perception of different sides. It addresses the accusations of racism and the portrayal of the conflict in the media, suggesting a need for a more balanced and nuanced understanding of the situation. The speaker emphasizes the importance of recognizing the humanity of all individuals involved in the conflict.

40:09

🤬 Accusations of Racism and the Importance of Fair Reporting

The final paragraph is a tense exchange where the speaker defends themselves against accusations of racism, highlighting their past interviews and efforts to address the situation in Gaza fairly. They express frustration with the media's portrayal of the conflict and the labeling of those who defend Palestinians as anti-Semitic. The paragraph ends with a call for an end to the heated debate and a commitment to continue seeking solutions and a better understanding of the situation.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Gaza

Gaza is a region on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, often in the news due to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the video, discussions revolve around the strong views on the situation in Gaza, indicating the human rights concerns and the political unrest in the area.

💡Israeli propaganda

This term refers to the perceived dissemination of information reflecting favorably on Israel's policies, often criticized for being one-sided. In the script, a speaker accuses another of framing the issue solely from an Israeli perspective, suggesting a lack of balance or objectivity in the discourse.

💡Protestors

Individuals who publicly demonstrate their objection to an issue, often advocating for change. The video discusses protestors at universities and their actions, which range from peaceful assembly to alleged violence and vandalism, highlighting the contentious nature of the protests.

💡Humanitarian aid

Assistance provided for humanitarian purposes, often in situations of disaster or conflict. A speaker in the video refers to the need for humanitarian aid for protesters, emphasizing the severity of the situation and the basic needs that are not being met.

💡Free speech

The right to express one's opinions without censorship or restraint, a fundamental principle in democratic societies. The video participants debate the limits of free speech, especially in the context of protests and controversial political issues.

💡Anti-Semitism

Discrimination against Jews, a form of prejudice and racism. The script mentions accusations of anti-Semitism against pro-Palestinian activists as a means to discredit them, showing the complexity of the conflict and the challenges in addressing it without resorting to stereotypes.

💡Campus protests

Demonstrations by students on educational institutions' grounds, often advocating for change or expressing dissatisfaction. The video discusses campus protests at Columbia University and elsewhere, indicating the widespread nature of student activism on this issue.

💡Palestinian solidarity

Expression of support for the Palestinian cause, often in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The video features discussions of protests showing solidarity with Palestinians, suggesting a global concern and empathy for their plight.

💡Violence at protests

The occurrence of violent acts during demonstrations, which can involve physical altercations or property damage. The script describes instances of violence at protests, raising questions about the legitimacy and tactics of the protesters, as well as the response from authorities.

💡Cancel culture

A modern social phenomenon where people seek to withdraw support for public figures or social groups that have done something considered unacceptable. The term is used in the video to criticize what is perceived as an attempt to suppress certain viewpoints, particularly in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian debate.

💡Terrorism

The use of violence and intimidation to achieve political aims, often causing fear and harm to civilians. In the video, the term is a point of contention, with different speakers debating whether certain actions by the IDF or other groups constitute terrorism, reflecting the difficulty in reaching a consensus on such a loaded term.

Highlights

The discussion revolves around the protests at Columbia University and the broader implications of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on campuses.

A participant argues that the framing of the issue has been heavily biased towards Israeli propaganda, neglecting the Palestinian perspective.

There is an agreement that Jewish students should not be harassed or attacked, but a debate on the reasons behind such incidents occurs.

The term 'Intifada' is discussed, with clarification that it means 'uprising' against oppression, not specifically violence.

Reports of vandalism and barricading of Hamilton Hall at Columbia University by protesters are mentioned.

The issue of free speech on campus is brought up, with concerns over potential limits on constitutionally protected speech.

A debate ensues over the use of the phrase 'from the river to the sea,' with accusations of promoting the eradication of Israel.

Javier Deuso shares his experience of infiltrating a pro-Palestinian encampment at UCLA, noting aggression and hate speech.

Cornell West emphasizes the importance of dialogue and transparency regarding university investments linked to the conflict.

The role of the media in shaping public perception of the conflict and the portrayal of protesters is criticized.

Concerns are raised about the harassment and intimidation of Jewish students, with calls for their protection.

The discussion touches on the historical context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the roots of violence.

The validity of the IDF's actions and whether they constitute terrorism is questioned, with differing viewpoints presented.

The heated exchange reflects the deep divisions and strong emotions tied to the conflict, both on campus and in the public discourse.

The necessity for a nuanced understanding of the situation in Gaza and the impact on students and journalists is emphasized.

The debate concludes with a call for protection of all students' rights and safety, regardless of their stance on the conflict.

Transcripts

00:00

that doesn't mean I don't have very

00:02

strong views about what's happening in

00:03

Gaza because you know that I do so what

00:06

where is my lie in all this yeah Piers

00:09

I've just listened to you for 20 minutes

00:11

frame the issue in a purely 100% Israeli

00:16

propaganda way so if you say Hey listen

00:20

the Jewish students shouldn't be

00:21

harassed or attacked of course I agree

00:23

I've you agree with me so why have I

00:25

lied yeah no no no stop interrupting

00:30

the protesters wreaking havoc at some of

00:32

America's top universities have a deadly

00:34

serious point unfortunately many of them

00:36

fundamentally unserious people Nothing

00:38

captured the insanity of this moment

00:40

better than a PhD candidate at Columbia

00:42

University stepping out to demand

00:44

humanitarian aid for the

00:46

protesters I guess it's ultimately a

00:48

question of what kind of community and

00:51

obligation Colombia feels it has to its

00:52

students um do you want students to die

00:56

of dehydration and starvation or get

00:58

severely ill even if they disagree with

01:00

you if the answer is no then you should

01:02

allow basic I mean it's crazy to say

01:04

because we're on an ivy Le campus but

01:06

this is like basic humanitarian Aid

01:07

we're asking for it seems like you're

01:09

sort of saying we want to be

01:11

revolutionaries we want to take up this

01:12

building now would you please bring us

01:15

food with a completely straight face she

01:18

demands urgent assistance for protesters

01:20

to spare them from dehydration

01:21

starvation and severe illness as she and

01:25

her mob friends voluntarily occupied a

01:27

private building in support of gar and

01:29

people actually facing dehydration

01:32

starvation and severe illness well

01:34

students protesting for peace is nothing

01:35

new they have every right to do it but

01:37

clearly they're are limits under the law

01:39

and at this point they're doing a better

01:40

job of Israeli propaganda than Israel's

01:44

government police have moved into eject

01:46

students from Columbia's Hamilton Hall

01:48

after reports they vandalized and

01:50

barricaded the famous building as the

01:51

university said this was because of the

01:53

protest as actions not because of their

01:55

cause officers Clash for students at

01:57

other campuses overnight including UCLA

01:59

Los Angeles where pro-israel protesters

02:01

moved on their Rivals and police

02:03

patients ran out it's all begin

02:05

unpleasant shades of the BLM riots in

02:08

2020 a fundamentally just cause which

02:10

became toxic and divisive fueled by

02:12

people who know little about the issues

02:13

a lot about causing chaos and quite AP

02:16

from apart from the absurdity of the

02:17

individuals involved it raises serious

02:19

questions and contradictions many of

02:21

former president Trump's feces critics

02:23

shuted at his blat Crackdown on most

02:26

2020 protests how does St Joe Biden's

02:28

supporters defend the SE we're

02:30

witnessing now and on the other hand

02:32

many of the staunchest offenders of free

02:33

speech have being the loudest supporters

02:35

of Israel and the fiercest critics of

02:36

the campus protesters so where is the

02:38

line and is it the police or the

02:40

protesters who've crossed it well in a

02:42

moment we'll debate all this with an

02:43

All-Star panel but first joining me now

02:45

is pro Palestinian activist Nardin kwani

02:48

who organized protests outside Columbia

02:50

and City University in New York last

02:52

night um okay Nadine welcome back to

02:55

uncensored you were there last night

02:57

there's a current ban uh on you and

03:00

others from Colombia dated from last

03:03

week uh saying that you are considered

03:05

Persona onr on all Colombia University

03:08

own property due to alarming and

03:10

concerning Behavior so why were you back

03:14

there I wasn't inside the gates of

03:16

Colombia I was outside of Colombia and

03:19

you know I'm able to be able to protest

03:22

outside of Colombia in support of the

03:23

students as a New Yorker just like New

03:25

Yorkers have been consistently showing

03:27

outside of the gates of Colombia um in

03:30

support of the students even before they

03:32

launched the GZA solidarity encampment

03:35

uh my organization within our lifetime

03:37

mobilized in support of Colombia

03:40

students uh from Jewish voice for peace

03:42

and from students for justice in

03:44

Palestine who are both suspended um

03:47

months ago and you know we're just

03:49

continuing that tradition that support

03:52

um from the community to the students so

03:54

we had a a protest that started at NYU

03:58

went to the new school made a stop at

04:00

fit the Fashion Institute of Technology

04:03

uh we made our way over to Colombia by

04:05

train and then ended at cuni so just

04:09

showing solidarity to all of the

04:11

encampments but it's not quite a

04:12

straightforward as just showing

04:13

solidarity uh mobs inside and outside

04:16

the campus have been chanting into F and

04:19

anyone who knows the history of the uh

04:22

conflict between Palestine and Israel

04:24

knows what in means it means a violent

04:26

Uprising they've been chanting from The

04:28

River To The Sea which of course course

04:29

involves the eradication of Israel we've

04:32

seen Jewish students being harassed uh

04:34

by by the mob we've seen Jewish

04:37

professors not being allowed in to teach

04:39

because of fears for their safety uh

04:41

we've seen others being held in

04:43

effective captivity following the

04:45

breaking in the violent breaking in of

04:48

an historic building uh all of this uh a

04:51

lot of it is Criminal from trespass to

04:54

vandalism to actually potentially

04:57

kidnapping people if you're not letting

04:58

them out when you break in um how do you

05:01

how do you so no kidnappings have happen

05:03

hang on I'm just saying potentially

05:05

potentially it could be categorized as

05:06

that so my question for you is why would

05:08

you support all this why do you support

05:11

chanting about a violent Uprising why

05:13

are Jewish students being harassed in

05:15

this manner why would you support the

05:17

wanton vandalism involved in smashing

05:19

into an historic

05:21

building so I'm going to try to answer

05:23

this in the order of everything you said

05:25

first of all an uh means shaking off in

05:28

Arabic or Uprising it's not just using

05:30

the Palestinian context but against

05:32

people fighting against oppression

05:34

everywhere and the City University of

05:36

New York where I was a student in

05:37

undergrad and for law school actually

05:40

investigated SJP um for the use of the

05:43

word in in previous um years they

05:47

released a report in 2016 that is public

05:49

right now you can find it um online that

05:52

clarifies that Ina is not an

05:54

anti-semitic there have been two inter

05:56

hang on there have been two inter the

05:57

first and second inter in the in the

06:00

conflict uh in the last 30 years been

06:02

these two Infamous interf fathers which

06:04

led to the deaths of many many people on

06:07

both sides both were violent uprisings

06:10

and so when people CH about when you

06:12

have a pro Palestinian when a pro

06:14

Palestinian group started as boycotts

06:17

started as strikes are you going to let

06:18

me respond because you actually made a

06:20

lot of accusations and I'm going to try

06:22

to respond to all of them in order okay

06:24

well you not going back and forth are

06:26

you going to try and deny that either

06:27

inap was violent

06:31

I believe that the Israeli colonizers

06:33

the zionists made it violent by

06:35

attacking peaceful protests just like we

06:37

saw the NYPD attack protesters at cuni

06:41

and at Colombia that made the situation

06:43

that wasn't previously violent violence

06:45

and all the acts of terrorism

06:46

perpetrated by Pro Palestinians against

06:49

Israelis during the two iners what do

06:51

you think of those I'm not here to

06:52

debate the first and second and the with

06:55

you I'm told you the definition of the

06:57

word you can

07:01

you're being disingenuous when people

07:02

when Pro Palestinian groups in a new

07:04

outside of New York University chant

07:06

about in they know what they're doing

07:08

and Jewish people know what they're

07:10

doing they are invoking the first and

07:12

second which involves which

07:15

involves protr has been chanting in for

07:19

decades so you know this and and let's

07:21

go back let's go to the second phrase

07:23

you say from The River To The Sea now

07:25

they want to make a problem with that

07:26

any chance that we say you know there's

07:28

this accusation of of anti-Semitism

07:30

because every single Pro Palestinian

07:32

activist has been accused of of

07:35

anti-Semitism as a way to silence them

07:37

even though just you know you mentioned

07:39

Jewish students before so many of these

07:41

Jewish students are standing with us are

07:43

with the protest inside and outside many

07:45

are not many are being hared Jewish

07:47

voice for peace was suped many je many

07:50

Jewish students are not and they're

07:51

being harassed and we're seeing the

07:52

videos of they're being harassed they're

07:54

being threatened they're being banned

07:55

from

07:57

going hared they've been but you're not

08:01

in Gaza doing this you're doing in the

08:03

middle of New York what does this have

08:05

to do with being in Gaza we're here as

08:07

New Yorkers as Arabs Muslims and

08:09

Palestinians and we're harassed daily

08:11

constantly not just since October 7th

08:14

but for as long as we have lived here

08:16

and you know that's constantly ignored

08:18

uh but when Palestinian students are

08:20

finally speaking up against the

08:22

slaughter of their people and Gaza and

08:24

all over Palestine you know it becomes a

08:26

problem now they want to you know pay

08:28

attention um to these things you know I

08:31

think every uh Palestinian organization

08:34

including my own has made it clear that

08:36

we stand against anti-Semitism and that

08:38

these smears of anti-Semitism against

08:40

Pro Palestinian activists are a

08:43

long-held tradition by the Zionist Lobby

08:45

by Zionist organizations as an attempt

08:48

to discredit people if protesters get

08:51

violent is that acceptable resistance to

08:54

the

08:56

oppression I haven't seen any violence

08:59

um happen happening at protest so I

09:00

don't even know why this um is a

09:02

question nobody's advocating for violent

09:05

protest and nobody say Jus including

09:08

myself would it be justified I just

09:10

answered that you're just repeating the

09:12

same question I feel like you're being

09:13

disingenous when I've already made this

09:15

you didn't answer if it would be

09:18

justified I just said it's not

09:20

acceptable how could it be justified

09:22

right so the only violence that we see

09:24

being Unleashed which is completely

09:26

unacceptable is by the nyp who have maed

09:30

protesters they ma people at NYU which I

09:33

saw with my own eyes

09:35

they last night they whipped out their

09:37

bons they beat people until they bled

09:40

people got people got punched in the

09:42

face they were bleeding from their teeth

09:44

you know this is the violence that's

09:46

complet because a howling vient that's

09:48

because a howling violent mob chanting

09:50

into broke into an historic building on

09:53

a private property it's not their

09:55

property they committed acts of

09:57

vandalism they committed acts of

09:58

trespass they were holding people

09:59

against their will they've been

10:01

threatening and harassing Jewish

10:02

students I'm sorry that's not a peaceful

10:04

protest right these people are not

10:06

protesting peace will were Colombia

10:08

students forced to stay inside the

10:10

journalism school you know the NYPD

10:13

literally poked open poked their head in

10:15

an open door and told the cuni

10:17

journalism students that if they left

10:19

that building they would be arrested

10:21

Colombia admin came to say that they

10:23

should have the right to report that

10:25

they can't limit um the freedom of

10:27

speech the freedom of the press and the

10:29

NYPD actually threatened Colombia um

10:31

Administration so the only people who

10:33

were being held against their will um

10:36

were the Colombia students by the NYPD

10:39

um and other students who were not part

10:40

of the journalism School part of the

10:42

other schools or in their dorms were

10:43

also ordered to shelter in place by the

10:46

Columbia Administration so everything

10:48

you've brought up from the violence to

10:50

people being held against their will

10:51

this is being perpetuated by the POS

10:54

people in positions of Power by the

10:56

administrations of these universities

10:58

and by the police Police Department who

11:00

was being used to crush peaceful protest

11:02

who was being used to show up in riot

11:04

gear and turn an otherwise peaceful

11:06

situation um into a riot never forget

11:09

that in 1968 150 protesters occupied the

11:13

same exact Hall that the students of

11:16

Colombia are were occupying as of last

11:18

night and forced to come out of Hamilton

11:20

Hall which they renamed hins Hall in

11:22

honor of the 5-year-old Palestinian girl

11:25

who was killed who had to sit in a car

11:27

with her family member for hours her

11:30

family members for hours while they

11:32

decayed while they rotted after being

11:33

killed by the Israeli Army and she

11:36

starved um to death nobody was able to

11:38

get to her um so you know okay the this

11:41

in 1968 Hamilton Hall was occupied by

11:44

over 150 students uh protesting South

11:47

African apartheid and this kind of

11:48

police violence wasn't used against them

11:50

and they are remembered in history as

11:52

Heroes so continuing the long held

11:54

tradition of University activism this is

11:57

what they were doing at this is what we

11:59

were doing at cuni and all the

12:01

encampments that we see not just in the

12:03

US but all seven continents I have to

12:05

move on because I have I have four other

12:07

guest but I appreciate you joining me

12:08

thank you very much but joining me now

12:09

is the independent presidential

12:10

candidate Cornell West who teaches at

12:12

Columbia and joins some of the student

12:14

protests the Fox News contributor cat

12:15

Tim former BLM supporter Javier deuso of

12:18

preu pru who broke into a pro

12:20

Palestinian encampment at UCLA and The

12:23

Young Turks founder Jen yugar uh Kat I

12:25

want to start with you because I know

12:26

you've got a a slight time constraint um

12:29

so I want to start with you and just

12:30

talk about one aspect of this which is

12:32

the whole issue of free speech in this

12:35

debate and we're going to get into the

12:36

two sides part of it in a moment with

12:39

the other guest but from a free speech

12:42

perspective what is your take on what

12:44

we're seeing

12:46

here so I've been very open about my

12:50

about this issue I think there's been

12:52

not quite enough focus on the Free

12:55

Speech issue I think that for example

12:58

you could look at Texas government

12:59

Abbott who in 2019 was saying there has

13:02

to be free speech on campuses there has

13:04

to be the first amendment on campuses

13:06

then on March 27th he signed something

13:09

that limits speech on campus including

13:11

constitutionally protected speech

13:14

including criticism of Israel's

13:16

government I think that what the

13:18

Constitution says is is very very clear

13:20

that that even hate speech is Free

13:22

Speech right so you can debate whether

13:25

something is or is not hate speech and

13:26

the debate you just have with your last

13:27

guest proves that there is some dis

13:29

agreement on that and the main point is

13:31

the government should not be the one

13:33

deciding what is and is not uh we have

13:35

Indi a spokesperson for the Indiana uh

13:38

police department saying hate speech

13:39

isn't free speech well that just simply

13:41

isn't true and it's the whole idea of

13:44

what it's always been which is that you

13:46

don't want the government to be in the

13:47

position of deciding what speech is and

13:49

is not allowed because that is going to

13:52

be dangerous for anyone including

13:54

including Jew Jewish students right I

13:56

mean there there was no free speech

13:58

obvious ly in Hitler's Germany right and

14:02

saying that Free Speech something is

14:04

First Amendment protected free speech is

14:06

not that you don't have to say you agree

14:07

with it and you can totally bring up the

14:10

fact that maybe it's been less

14:12

consistent in terms of uh all of a

14:14

sudden now a lot of these University

14:15

presidents are super pro- free speech

14:18

when it comes to this when they haven't

14:19

been in the past but to me that's not

14:21

going to cause me to be hypocritical on

14:23

this issue I'm I'm a First Amendment

14:24

absolutist I was in 2019 I was before

14:27

2019 and I still am today what if you

14:29

are chanting

14:31

inter given the history of

14:34

interfers between Israel and Palestine

14:37

uh twice in the last 30 years we know

14:39

what interfers have been there there've

14:41