Vivek Ramaswamy: Trump Wildwood Rally & Ann Coulter's Controversial Comments | PBD Podcast | Ep. 410

PBD Podcast
13 May 202496:44

Summary

TLDRThe transcript appears to be a detailed discussion on a variety of political topics, featuring conversations around the potential future roles of a prominent political figure, the importance of trust and conviction in leadership, and the challenges of navigating political and social landscapes. It touches on the themes of nationalism, the impact of certain policies on future elections, and the influence of media and public opinion on political strategy. The discussion also extends to the importance of free speech, the role of the United States in global conflicts, and the necessity for political leaders to make tough decisions in the interest of the nation. Throughout the conversation, there is a strong emphasis on the need for honesty, accountability, and the courage to make decisions that may not always be politically convenient but are deemed necessary for the greater good.

Takeaways

  • ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ The host expresses his admiration for V, considering him a top contender for the 2028 presidential election due to his intelligence, policy knowledge, and charismatic personality.
  • ๐Ÿค” V discusses the challenges he faced during his campaign, including issues related to his ethnicity and religious background, which impacted his ability to connect with certain voter demographics.
  • ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ V emphasizes the importance of the U.S. Constitution regarding the qualifications for the presidency and counters arguments that question his American identity based on his immigrant parents.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ฅ The conversation touches on the potential roles V might take on if asked by President Trump, reflecting V's willingness to serve in various capacities for the betterment of the country.
  • ๐Ÿ’ก V highlights the need for immediate action in certain areas such as immigration and border security, expressing his commitment to these issues and his intent to stay engaged in national affairs.
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ The host and V criticize the politicization of the legal system in relation to Trump's trial, arguing that the charges are baseless and represent a misuse of prosecutorial power.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ Discussion about the importance of holding public officials accountable, with V stating that he would not shy away from making tough decisions and would prioritize the country's needs over political considerations.
  • ๐Ÿค V speaks positively about Ben Carson and Tulsi Gabbard, appreciating their backgrounds outside of politics and their potential contributions to public service.
  • ๐Ÿ› The topic of draining the swamp in Washington is addressed, with V advocating for decisive action to reduce the size of the federal bureaucracy and protect American interests.
  • ๐Ÿšซ V opposes the passing of the anti-Semitism awareness act in Congress, arguing that it infringes on free speech and is a misguided attempt to police opinions.
  • ๐Ÿ“‰ The conversation concludes with a reflection on the current state of political discourse, with a call for more open and honest debate, and a critique of the tendency to avoid difficult conversations.

Q & A

  • What was the main topic of discussion regarding the podcast guest?

    -The main topic of discussion was the guest's perspective on nationalism, national identity, and the future direction of the conservative movement in the United States.

  • How did the podcast host describe the guest's opening monologue?

    -The host described the guest's opening monologue as fantastic and appreciated the thoughtful perspectives shared by the guest.

  • What was the guest's position on the criteria for being the US president?

    -The guest believed that to be a US president, one has to be more American, implying that the more generations a family has been in the United States, the more qualified they are for the presidency.

  • What was the host's reaction to the guest's view on the presidency criteria?

    -The host disagreed with the guest's view, arguing that being American is not solely defined by the number of generations a family has been in the United States.

  • What issue did the host bring up regarding the Republican primary?

    -The host brought up the issue of racism and xenophobia within the Republican primary, mentioning personal experiences and challenges faced during the campaign due to his ethnicity and religion.

  • What was the host's stance on the potential for a non-white candidate to win the Republican nomination?

    -The host believed that a non-white candidate could win the Republican nomination, emphasizing that it would depend on the individual's qualifications and alignment with the party's values.

  • What was the host's view on the importance of the vice presidential pick in the 2028 election?

    -The host viewed the vice presidential pick as very important, stating that the VP selection could potentially be the leading candidate for the presidency in 2028.

  • How did the host feel about the potential of being asked to serve as Vice President?

    -The host expressed that anyone who cares about the country and is aligned with the Republican party's vision would have a responsibility to accept the position if asked.

  • What was the guest's opinion on the role of conviction in politics?

    -The guest valued conviction in politics, respecting individuals who stand by their deeply held beliefs even if they are part of a fringe minority.

  • What did the host and guest discuss regarding the situation in Israel?

    -They discussed the right of Israel to defend itself, the importance of not micromanaging Israel's defense strategies, and the need for a rational and cool-headed approach to foreign policy.

  • What was the host's view on the use of the term 'Elites' in political discourse?

    -The host suggested that the term 'Elites' could be misleading, as it does not accurately describe all individuals in positions of power or influence, and proposed a more nuanced understanding of societal structures.

Outlines

00:00

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Podcast Introduction and Upcoming Topics

The speaker introduces the podcast and outlines various topics for discussion, including a recent exchange on a podcast related to racial remarks, potential political appointments, reactions to Trump's support for Israel, and a protest at Duke University involving Jerry Seinfeld.

05:00

๐Ÿค” Reflections on Political Candidacy and National Identity

The speaker reflects on their experience as a political candidate, addressing comments about their race and religion, and discusses the concept of nationalism and national identity within the context of American politics.

10:01

๐Ÿฆ Entrepreneurship, American Dream, and Political Vision

The speaker talks about their background as an entrepreneur, their alignment with Trump's America First policy, and the unique opportunity presented by the incumbent president's track record as action versus promises.

15:02

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Trust in Leadership and the Republican Base

The conversation delves into trust in political leadership, the Republican base's preference for Trump, and the challenges faced by new or less-known candidates in building trust with the electorate.

20:03

๐Ÿ’ก Future Political Aspirations and Commitment to Country

The speaker expresses their commitment to the country over personal ambition, stating they would only run for president if they believed it was essential for the country's future. They also discuss the importance of immediate action for the country's benefit.

25:05

๐Ÿค Willingness to Serve in Any Capacity for the Country

The speaker asserts that they would accept any role offered by President Trump if it would benefit the country, emphasizing their 'America First' mentality and commitment to public service.

30:08

๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ Accountability and Political Strategy

The speaker discusses the importance of accountability in political roles, their approach to removing unsuitable candidates, and their views on the use of political tactics and strategies in achieving goals.

35:08

๐ŸŒŽ Foreign Policy and National Sovereignty

The speaker shares their views on foreign policy, emphasizing the importance of national sovereignty and non-interference in the affairs of other nations, while also discussing specific geopolitical situations.

40:09

๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Free Speech and the First Amendment

The speaker passionately defends the First Amendment and the right to free speech, criticizing legislation that would limit expression of opinions, even those considered extreme or hateful.

45:10

๐Ÿค” Self-Criticism and Engagement in Political Discourse

The speaker calls for self-criticism within the Republican party and emphasizes the need for open debate and engagement with opposing views, suggesting a more proactive approach in various forums.

50:11

๐Ÿ“บ Media Commentary on Immigration Policy

The speaker comments on media discussions surrounding immigration policy, suggesting a shift towards more secure policies as seen under the previous administration, and the political implications of such changes.

Mindmap

Keywords

๐Ÿ’กEntrepreneurship

Entrepreneurship refers to the process of designing, launching, and running a new business which typically involves risk-taking and innovation. In the video, the speaker identifies as an entrepreneur and discusses the value-driven approach to business and governance, which is central to the theme of innovation and leadership within the entrepreneurial world.

๐Ÿ’กAmerican Dream

The American Dream is a national ethos of the United States that suggests that freedom, prosperity, and success are achievable through hard work, determination, and initiative. The speaker mentions living the American Dream, indicating the aspirational pursuit that aligns with the video's narrative of success through personal endeavor.

๐Ÿ’กNationalism

Nationalism is the belief or ideology that involves an individual's identification with, or loyalty to, their nation. It is a recurring theme in the video where the speaker discusses the concept in the context of political leadership and identity, suggesting a strong connection to national values and sovereignty.

๐Ÿ’กImmigration Policy

Immigration policy refers to the regulations and practices of a country concerning the immigration of people into its territory. The video discusses the importance of immigration policy, particularly in relation to border security and the deportation of illegal immigrants, which is a significant topic in the context of national governance and sovereignty.

๐Ÿ’กGlobalism

Globalism is the advocacy of a single, integrated global society with a shared cultural and economic system. The speaker contrasts globalism with nationalism, suggesting a preference for policies that prioritize national interests, which is a key point in the discussion about America First policies.

๐Ÿ’กPopulism

Populism is a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by the political elite. The video addresses the rise of populism as a reaction against elitism and in favor of the common people's interests, which is a central theme in the discourse on democratic values and political representation.

๐Ÿ’กBorder Security

Border security involves measures taken by a country to monitor and control the flow of people, goods, and vehicles across its borders. The video emphasizes the importance of border security, particularly in the context of illegal immigration, highlighting it as a critical issue for national safety and policy.

๐Ÿ’กPolitical Prosecution

Political prosecution is the act of using the powers of government to persecute political opponents. The video discusses the concept in the context of a trial, suggesting that it represents a threat to democracy and the fair operation of the political process.

๐Ÿ’กFirst Principles

First principles are the fundamental truths or propositions that serve as the foundation for a system of analysis or argument. The speaker refers to first principles as a guiding philosophy, emphasizing the importance of returning to core values and beliefs when forming policy and making decisions.

๐Ÿ’กFree Speech

Free speech is the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint. The video touches on the importance of free speech as a foundational aspect of democratic societies, arguing against legislation that might limit the expression of even controversial or disagreeable opinions.

๐Ÿ’กDiplomatic Relations

Diplomatic relations refer to the official interactions between two nations and the framework within which they conduct their mutual relations. The video discusses the need for a strong diplomatic stance to support allies, indicating the complexity of navigating international politics while protecting national interests.

Highlights

The conversation begins with a discussion on the value of David over Goliath in the context of entrepreneurship and the underdog's potential for success.

A recent podcast exchange is mentioned where the guest suggested being 'too Brown' to become president, prompting a debate on racism and representation in politics.

Speculation about a high-profile individual's potential role in government, including positions like Homeland Security, Secretary of Commerce, VP, or AG, is addressed.

The incident at Duke University where Jerry Seinfeld faced a walkout during his commencement speech due to his support for Israel is discussed.

Michael Cohen's situation with Stormy Daniels and his potential aspirations for a Nike sponsorship are humorously examined.

Comments on CNN's Fareed Zakaria suggesting a return to Trump's immigration policies are critiqued, highlighting a shift in mainstream media discourse.

A Wall Street Journal statistic on the global concern of not having enough babies being born is noted, signaling a potential demographic crisis.

The issue of discrimination potentially causing people to age faster is debated, with a critique of the Forbes article's angle and implications.

A discussion on the future direction of the conservative movement and the role of nationalism and national identity in politics is explored.

The concept of 'Americanness' is questioned, with a debate on whether being born in the U.S. or having a long family history in the country makes one a 'true American'.

The impact of faith and religion on political campaigns is examined, with personal anecdotes from the guest about his experiences as a Hindu candidate.

The potential for a non-white candidate to secure the Republican nomination in the future is debated, with opinions on the current political climate.

The importance of action over words in political leadership is emphasized, with a nod to Trump's track record as a unique opportunity for voters.

The guest's stance on being open to various roles in government if they align with his skills and the needs of the country is shared.

The topic of illegal immigration and border security as a key issue for the next administration is highlighted, with the guest's views on necessary reforms.

The guest's commitment to the 'America First' policy and his vision for its continuation beyond the Trump presidency is discussed.

The potential risks and rewards of taking a hard stance on cutting federal bureaucracy and the 'draining the swamp' agenda are debated.

Transcripts

00:00

30 seconds did you ever think you would

00:02

make it I feel I'm tast Victory I know

00:08

this

00:10

me why would you bet on Goliath when we

00:12

got bet David value giv values

00:15

contagious this world of entrepreneurs

00:17

we get no value to hat run homie look

00:19

what I become I'm I'm the

00:21

[Music]

00:24

one all right we're about to go live

00:26

here with the one and only V while I'm

00:28

taking a picture with them by the way

00:31

uh we got a lot to cover I I don't know

00:33

how many times we've done this three

00:34

four five times but every time we talk

00:36

to VI the the conversation is always

00:38

Lively we talk about a bunch of

00:39

different issues let me kind of give you

00:41

some things we want to talk about today

00:44

uh one is uh uh you know a exchange that

00:48

he had with a recent podcast that he is

00:50

too Brown to become a president we got

00:52

to get a reaction on that which we will

00:54

you know uh and then the other part is

00:56

the uh a position job is he going to be

01:00

getting the homeland security job that

01:01

freaked a lot of people out is he going

01:02

to get the Secretary of Commerce is it

01:04

VP is it AG is it nothing is what what

01:07

is the conversation going to be but

01:08

we'll talk about that the trial in New

01:10

York jersey with Trump did Jerry

01:13

Seinfeld who's a speaker at Duke

01:15

graduation and all of a sudden a bunch

01:18

of people walk out you got to see this

01:21

aside from that there's the Michael

01:22

Cohen thing going on right now with

01:24

stormmy Daniel and Michael Cohen I think

01:27

may have wanted to get sponsored by Nike

01:29

when you hear what what he talked about

01:30

based on a quote that Trump told him

01:32

back in the days scaramucci said some

01:34

stuff about Trump saying he's a very

01:36

very dangerous man and should be nowhere

01:39

near the White

01:40

House cers for Palestine Pro Palestine

01:43

protesters stop traffic at Walt Disney

01:45

World in Florida you'll see what that's

01:47

all about and then we got a couple other

01:49

stories here let me still continue with

01:50

this North Dakota governor former

01:53

presidential candidate Doug B beram

01:55

front and center at Jersey Rally with

01:58

Trump what's he doing there that's a

02:00

conversation that's being brought up

02:01

lately RFK says he will qualify for

02:04

presidential debates as the issue's

02:06

challenge to Trump coint testifies and

02:10

you'll see what he'll say here Pelosi

02:12

rebuked to her face during Oxford debate

02:16

about 2016 election very weird what she

02:19

said and then what the student and the

02:22

person that was you know rebuking her

02:24

you just have to see what happens in

02:25

this situation very interesting and then

02:28

a couple other things Trump just

02:29

recently said I support Israel's right

02:31

to win its war on terror then CNN

02:34

Zakaria by which is by the way he's he's

02:37

he's he has an owner and the owner is on

02:39

our panel here because without him

02:41

nobody would I mean without Adam you

02:43

know Vinnie nobody would have ever known

02:45

about zakari without Adam because it's

02:46

all yeah CNN Zakaria Biden should go

02:49

back to Trump's immigration policies

02:53

then numbers just showed up a

02:55

record-breaking number for the number of

02:57

people with full-time jobs and part time

03:00

jobs will see this couple things here in

03:02

the economy we'll talk about there's a

03:04

stat that just came out from Wall Street

03:05

Journal I want to get VI's take on this

03:08

suddenly there aren't enough babies the

03:10

whole world is alarmed with not enough

03:13

babies being born

03:15

Christine um there's a restraining order

03:19

on her and all the dogs in South Dakota

03:21

which is kind of deeply concerning we're

03:22

going to see we're going to see what our

03:24

friend here has to say and last but not

03:26

least I thought this was kind of

03:27

interesting story by Forbes I don't know

03:29

who wrote it I'm just curious with this

03:31

title discrimination may cause people to

03:34

age faster and affects white people most

03:38

who the hell would write Wonder this is

03:41

a Forbes article guys that we're talking

03:44

about Forbes article so but I have to

03:46

start off with this can I say one word

03:47

on that do you think if the article's

03:50

findings were that discrimination would

03:52

cause people to age slower would they

03:54

have published it I don't think so no

03:57

this is a great opportunity for them to

03:59

write something like

04:00

can can you pull this up so an cter who

04:03

we've had on the podcast before an

04:05

couter I think you and her are you know

04:08

on a show together you're doing

04:09

something together and she asked this

04:11

question I just want to get your

04:12

reaction on Rob go and play this clip

04:14

that's why I brought on today somebody

04:16

who I think has some thoughtful

04:17

perspectives on the future direction of

04:19

our country of our conservative movement

04:21

and on this question of nationalism and

04:23

national identity somebody whove been

04:24

fascinated for by for a long time fast

04:26

forward to when she say intera with on

04:28

social media but for the first time

04:29

we're having

04:32

in the offline sense of it it's an cter

04:35

so an thanks for coming on and I'm

04:37

looking forward to our conversation

04:38

today me too thanks for having me that

04:41

was a fantastic opening monologue uh I

04:44

too am a fan of yours I'm going to make

04:47

a point of disagreeing with you so that

04:49

it will be fun um you are so bright and

04:52

articulate and I guess I can call you

04:54

articulate since you're not an American

04:55

black um can't can't say that about them

04:58

that's that's derogatory

05:00

um and that was a great opening segment

05:02

lots of things to talk about there oh

05:04

and I agreed with many many things you

05:06

said during in fact probably more than

05:09

than most other candidates um when you

05:11

were running for president but I still

05:13

would not have voted for you um because

05:16

you're an Indian we'll get back to that

05:20

um just skip over the

05:23

racism how well first of all what was

05:25

did you know she was because it seems

05:27

like when you guys are starting there's

05:28

a little bit of tension I don't know if

05:30

there was like pre getting started with

05:32

there was tension or not oh you're

05:33

pretty good at picking that up man so so

05:34

actually so so give you the context here

05:36

so I ran this podcast during the

05:38

presidential campaign it was called

05:39

Truth yeah I took some time off after

05:41

the campaign and now you know getting

05:42

back in the swing of things so we

05:43

relaunched the truth podcast just La

05:45

relaunched it officially last week so

05:47

you know get that up on the ground you

05:48

would have good conversations and I

05:50

wanted to I wanted to pick on some

05:51

people who had poked me a little bit on

05:54

social media or in other ways to be able

05:56

to you know it's kind of boring to just

05:57

talk about everybody who agrees with the

05:58

same thing right right but let's get a

06:00

little bit of tension from the left from

06:01

the right so I'll bring Anne ctron

06:03

because during the campaign I don't

06:04

remember what exactly she said but on

06:06

numerous instances would comment on

06:09

different ways in which I might not be

06:11

quite qualified to be president right so

06:13

so let's get it on and have a

06:14

conversation and both of us are interest

06:15

interested in the theme of nationalism I

06:17

did not expect she would just kick it

06:19

off right there get right into the

06:21

business and I think it actually made

06:23

for really good conversation Believe It

06:25

or Not of course I disagree with hell

06:26

like her on that being a criteria to be

06:29

the US president is her description of

06:31

whether or not you're an Indian I'm born

06:33

in the United States I'm as American as

06:35

they come but I thought it actually

06:37

formed a really strong basis for an

06:40

honest conversation that we otherwise

06:41

don't have because her view is that in

06:45

order to actually be a US president you

06:47

got to be even more American right so

06:49

you're not fully American if your

06:51

parents weren't from the United States

06:52

of America and in order to trust

06:54

somebody the more Generations they've

06:56

been here let's say you've been here six

06:57

or seven generations you have more of

06:59

what she would call I think she did call

07:01

during the podcast a security policy

07:03

it's like an insurance policy that you

07:05

know that if you're going to put

07:06

somebody in that high office at least

07:08

you know that they've really really

07:10

soaked up what it means to be American

07:12

now I disagree with that I disagree with

07:14

that because you have people in the

07:15

Seventh Generation Americans who are the

07:17

kids of some I've been to I've known

07:19

many of these people grow up in the

07:20

Upper East Side some daughter who lives

07:22

in Brooklyn thinks she's a hippie talks

07:24

about hating this country well I don't

07:26

think that that person's any more

07:27

American than I am just because my

07:29

parents happen to have been legal

07:31

immigrants to this country I got two

07:32

questions for you but it made for a good

07:33

conversation I got two questions for you

07:34

with this okay on one end how many

07:37

people you think are like if you were to

07:39

say of the voter's block what percentage

07:42

of the voter block agrees with her so

07:45

say in in the Republican primary in the

07:47

Republican primary to say you know what

07:48

I'm not going to even if it's 1% 2% 3%

07:51

what do you think it is so I will tell

07:53

you this with

07:55

confidence it is a lot higher than I

07:58

believed it was a year ago interesting

08:01

yeah it's a lot higher than I believe

08:02

you would think it is too which is why

08:04

and I said this on social media and some

08:06

people hit me on the left from it I said

08:07

I respect her for saying it even though

08:09

I disagree right because at least she

08:12

has the spine to say in public what many

08:17

other people not a majority not even

08:18

close to a majority but a lot of people

08:21

she's not alone she is voicing a view

08:23

that I think is widespread and you know

08:25

actually I what the hell we're here

08:27

we're just gonna gonna let loose a

08:29

little bit I had I had somebody textt me

08:32

who had run for position you you guys

08:33

might know her harit Dylan you know har

08:36

Dyan har meit's super cool so I hope

08:39

she's fine with me saying this because I

08:40

think it's important that the public

08:41

know we we can't just have these

08:42

conversations by closed doors not have

08:44

them in the open said that when she ran

08:46

for her position of being the chairwoman

08:48

of the RNC she had many people tell her

08:50

the same thing too which is interesting

08:51

to me because most of the Grassroots was

08:54

you know a lot of the Grassroots were

08:55

with me a lot of Grassroots were with

08:56

people like carmit but there are people

08:58

who believe that if you're electing

09:00

people to positions of leadership how

09:03

American you are is a spectrum when you

09:05

were out there campaigning did anybody

09:07

face you confront you and say I would

09:09

totally support you but you're too Brown

09:11

for me did anyone say so I had many of

09:13

those for religion so I didn't have

09:16

anybody come up and say that because of

09:19

well there were people on social media

09:21

who would make an argument it wasn't on

09:22

ethnicity and this is part of Ann's

09:23

Point too it's the point that your

09:25

parents were immigrants to this country

09:28

and so you are truly not at the highest

09:30

level of being American to be president

09:32

of the United States right so we had a

09:33

number of people that would say that

09:34

occasionally a much more common one

09:36

though for people to my face was I would

09:39

love to vote for you it's difficult for

09:42

me to vote for somebody else because I

09:44

agree with you more but I can't do that

09:46

because you are Hindu that came up a lot

09:48

especially in Iowa even the town hall

09:50

when we did somebody asked you one of

09:51

the ladies got up you remember that I

09:53

remember ask you a question but I

09:54

thought your answer was fantastic but

09:55

she I remember her she was she was I was

09:57

standing on stage she was standing right

09:58

there very thoughtful yes I don't think

10:00

she was in the category of saying I

10:01

can't vote for no she didn't say she

10:03

asked a very legitimate question is said

10:04

tell me about your faith right because

10:06

if you're running for president I got to

10:07

know who you are and if your faith is

10:09

important to you then in order to know

10:11

who you are I got to know your faith

10:12

that's different from I'm telling you

10:14

though I will face people in Iowa

10:15

there's Pastor in Iowa who wrote an

10:17

extensive Facebook post I spent two

10:18

hours with him on the back of a bus

10:20

talking it through and he still came out

10:21

on the other side as he said if it is

10:23

God's will for you to be the US

10:25

president I will accept it respect but I

10:28

can't vote for you myself myself because

10:30

I can't vote for somebody who doesn't

10:32

share my let me stay on this year so

10:33

first of all if strategically I don't

10:36

know if an cter wants to sell you some

10:39

product that Samy Sosa used I don't know

10:41

if you're familiar with Samy SAA Sammy

10:42

sa he wiin the skin wh Samy so I didn't

10:47

know that

10:48

I he used what Michael Jack if you're

10:51

interested this is real real real story

10:54

he got his skin to be lighter so you can

10:56

go couple shade you know lighter Rob I

10:59

don't know why you're laughing I'm

11:00

trying to make a solution here to make

11:02

an happy I'm not I'm not going to be a

11:03

customer I'm sorry but he was so by the

11:06

way this guy hit 66 home runs and he

11:08

saved MLB in 1998 let me go back to the

11:10

question here with this one here okay

11:12

what do you think's more extreme what do

11:13

you think is more extreme and tell me

11:15

how your argument is on the other side

11:16

so one side you know what I don't think

11:20

America because you know back in the

11:21

days what was JFK was Tom you said Roman

11:24

Catholic it was a Roman Catholic where

11:25

America those are the headlines when

11:27

Nixon was running it's a Roman Catholic

11:29

not ready for Roman Catholic President

11:31

okay and then America said nah we're

11:33

okay with it right actually cool with

11:34

that okay we're we actually cool with

11:35

that do you think give me which of these

11:38

are more extreme so do you think an

11:41

coulter's position of saying no not only

11:44

do I want you to be a c natural-born

11:47

citizen but I also want you to be white

11:50

to be a true nationalist to be a

11:52

president here how about the opposite

11:54

side what about somebody that wasn't

11:56

born here but has lived here for 35

11:58

years yeah should this person have the

12:00

right to run for office one day in

12:02

America if they paid their taxes they'

12:04

paid their dues they've lived in America

12:05

for 35 years should they have the chance

12:07

to run for office should they have the

12:08

chance to run for US president pres no

12:10

you want to know why cuz the

12:11

Constitution says so so if you want to

12:12

change change the Constitution and would

12:14

you have two-thirds of this country and

12:15

two3 of the state ratify that that's a

12:17

separate conversation but what the

12:19

Constitution says now is you have to be

12:20

a natural born citizen sure and a

12:22

natural born citizen as it's ever been

12:23

read by courts as it's ever been read

12:25

through American history for the last

12:26

century and a half is you're born in the

12:29

United States of America and so I think

12:31

the Constitution is a beautiful thing we

12:33

don't have to relitigate these questions

12:35

every generation go with what the

12:37

Constitution actually says and if an

12:38

cter is watching maybe an cter wants to

12:41

amend the Constitution and say naturally

12:44

born white citizen right with a skin

12:48

tone that is you know maybe be put tears

12:50

in the skin tone to to please anter what

12:51

do you think I'm just trying to get some

12:53

creative ideas here I mean Biden's

12:56

father's father's father's father are

12:58

all born in America I would much rather

13:00

vote for somebody like this than

13:01

somebody that's families families

13:03

families been here and ain't doing

13:04

well my opinion is this when it comes on

13:06

to VI and I I told you this last week I

13:09

think in you know how we were going to

13:11

the GOP debate we went to all the

13:13

debates and we'd watch VI and we're like

13:15

did this guy should crush it tomorrow on

13:17

the you know what do you call it the the

13:19

polls right and you'd go you're like 6

13:22

and a half% s and a half per. like how

13:25

this guy's not jumping up to 22% 18% and

13:28

you realize

13:29

because there's a guy in the way of that

13:31

not in the way he is what majority of

13:35

Republicans want to run at this year

13:37

2024 and his name is Donald J Trump by

13:40

the way rightly so he's earned the right

13:42

to be a lead dog of 2024 there's no

13:45

question about it there's a lot of

13:46

people that want him to go back and do

13:48

that what I'm very curious about very

13:51

very and by the way I want to ask you

13:52

know the audience's question Rob if you

13:54

want to run a poll for this is in my

13:57

opinion you know how when NBA or college

14:00

uh basketball a guy skips like the other

14:03

day we were with that basketball player

14:04

that was at the derby with us a tall guy

14:06

the center for uh uh Kansas I think he

14:10

left the team to go to Kansas tall guy

14:11

good-looking guy and we're having a

14:13

conversation with him and you so I think

14:15

this guy's going to be the number one

14:16

draft pickup next year Hunter Dickinson

14:18

yeah shout out to him really nice guy 72

14:21

but so to me my opinion of

14:24

2028 presidential candidate number one

14:27

draft pick

14:29

number one draft pick 2028 is VI I agree

14:33

100% I'm convinced it's number one and

14:36

in in a most curious way of just trying

14:38

to do case studies I am so curious to

14:41

know where let's just say whether Trump

14:43

wins or loses likely them him running in

14:45

2028 I don't think he's going to run in

14:47

2028 he wins okay a lot of he even

14:49

thinks in Jersey he said I think we can

14:51

win all 50 states is what he said I

14:52

don't if you heard of speech say he wins

14:55

2028 where's magga gonna want to go to

14:57

that can fill that void I don't know I

15:00

think it's uh it's going to be what do

15:01

you think about that the fact that a lot

15:02

of that audience you know I will say

15:05

this is I understand why the Republican

15:08

base went for Donald Trump so handily

15:11

this time around because it makes all

15:12

the sense in the world right it's not

15:13

just about policy Vision it's that this

15:15

guy's actually done it right so he's

15:17

tried and true and I hadn't done it

15:19

right I'm 38 years old I'm an

15:20

entrepreneur I lived the American dream

15:22

I have a vision that very closely aligns

15:24

with Donald Trump's America First

15:26

division you know some small differences

15:27

here and there in the campaign

15:29

but this is a guy who rarely in American

15:31

history do you get this opportunity it's

15:32

a Once in a century opportunity actually

15:35

the once in a century opportunity in

15:36

this election is usually you get to

15:38

measure an incumbent versus somebody

15:41

who's challenging him who says hey I'm

15:42

going to do all of these things that

15:43

I've never done R last time you got it

15:46

with Grover Cleveland this time you have

15:47

it this time around where you get to say

15:48

he I've got four years of trump of

15:51

action not words four years of action

15:52

and then four years of action with Biden

15:55

compare and make your choice so I think

15:56

the Republican primary base in

15:58

retrospect it was never going to be

16:00

anyone other than Donald Trump because

16:02

that is a rare and unique opportunity to

16:04

vote for actual Action Now MAA and

16:07

America First does not end with Donald

16:09

Trump in some ways it didn't begin with

16:10

Donald Trump it began in 1776 but Donald

16:13

Trump revived it but the question is

16:15

who's going to carry that forward and

16:16

it's not just going to be the president

16:18

it's going to be people all the way from

16:19

school board to Governor to state

16:21

legislator to city councilman but also

16:23

to US president as well and so I'll tell

16:26

you this I I'm not one of these guys who

16:27

makes elaborate plans to say okay well

16:30

if this happens then I'm going to do

16:31

that and if that doesn't happen I'm

16:32

going to do the next thing cuz it never

16:34

goes according to plan anyway but I'm

16:35

not going anywhere is what I'll tell you

16:37

is we're going to stay with this fight

16:39

for the country and wherever it leads

16:40

I'm going to do it I have a technical

16:42

question for you but I'll stop to ask

16:43

the question because Adam's got a

16:44

question what this technical question is

16:45

a very heavy question go ahead well Adam

16:47

go ahead I I I will say what I think but

16:50

I also give a a more of a macro opinion

16:53

I agree with Pat that you should be the

16:55

leading candidate in 2028 you have style

16:58

you have substance you have policy and

17:00

you have personality you got Pizzazz and

17:02

you also know your stuff I've said

17:04

openly and loudly VC is literally the

17:05

smartest guy I've ever sat down with

17:07

I've also said the following there's no

17:10

chance that the Republican base is

17:13

voting for a brown guy I've said it on

17:15

this podcast multiple times hear me out

17:18

because an couter said out loud what

17:22

many people are thinking and you said

17:24

yourself and this is going to be my

17:25

question oh I didn't realize that the

17:27

base actually wasn't ready for all this

17:30

now you're born in America you're from

17:32

Ohio I want to say more presidents have

17:34

come out of Ohio than any state in the

17:36

Union right it's up there seven seven or

17:38

so yep okay so as far as I go I would

17:41

vote for you in a heartbeat if you were

17:44

a Democrat if you were a woke

17:45

Progressive Dei guy checking all those

17:48

boxes bing bing bing you'd be the next

17:50

Obama no doubt you know you know you've

17:52

been said before skinny kid with a with

17:54

a a weird L that but the candidate on

18:00

the left on the right there there there

18:04

is a challenge there and I'm not saying

18:05

that you're going to go left here what

18:07

did you learn that you admittedly said I

18:09

had no idea that this was going to be

18:10

more of a challenge than I thought well

18:13

look I think a couple things first of

18:14

all to be clear to State the obvious I

18:16

think the reason I did not win the

18:17

Republican Presidential nomination has

18:19

nothing to do with my skin color it has

18:20

to do with he think so a part of Reas I

18:22

didn't win it think has to do with Trump

18:25

1 million exactly you have you have some

18:27

you somebody been and yes but then you

18:29

look at a lot of the data of the people

18:31

who were Ling me at I thought my support

18:34

in Iowa on the ground I mean the people

18:35

were drawing the energy level so high

18:38

compared to you see a lot of the other

18:39

candidates campaigning in Iowa very dull

18:41

yet many of those people with a lot of

18:43

energy coming to my stuff went in there

18:45

and voted for Donald Trump they love me

18:47

and what I had to say but they love

18:49

Donald Trump as the next US president

18:51

more and I number one draft pick and I

18:53

get that so that that's I think where it

18:54

comes from now did I learn something I

18:56

think I did underestimate

19:00

the trust Factor overall see so I put

19:03

all of these into a broader category of

19:05

building trust you're somebody new

19:07

somebody who's young somebody who yes is

19:10

a little different in a number of ways

19:12

you could put eth ethnic lineage

19:15

religion in that category you got a guy

19:17

who you know isn't known to most of the

19:20

American public yes I actually I mean

19:22

different people have different gifts

19:23

and I'm bad at a lot of things but one

19:25

of the things is I do like to explain my

19:26

views in detail and sometimes people

19:28

like that but some people sometimes

19:29

people find that skeptical too they're

19:31

skeptical of somebody who's going to

19:32

explain something in the way that I do

19:35

is he just selling me on something that

19:36

he doesn't really believe in so all of

19:38

that I think came together to say that

19:40

they got to know me this time around

19:42

many people many of our supporters once

19:44

they became sta supporters didn't go

19:46

back I mean these are people who even to

19:48

this day are running through Vault walls

19:50

to try to advance my vision for this

19:52

country but I think unambiguously the

19:55

reason why I wasn't the nominee this

19:57

time is because was a guy who was proven

19:59

who had done it who I am supporting

20:01

fully by the way and who I hope is the

20:03

ex president and I think that's actually

20:05

the most important takeaway and so I'm

20:06

not of the view that uh somebody can't

20:09

win a Republican or Democratic

20:10

nomination for that matter based on

20:12

their skin color if the white guy can

20:14

win the Democratic nomination for a race

20:16

obsessed left certainly a non-white guy

20:18

can win the Republican nomination for a

20:20

for a party that on term stands fair to

20:22

say and I agree with Pat like number one

20:25

candidate 2028 is it fair to say I know

20:27

you don't want to probably look at too

20:29

far uh when do you make a decision like

20:32

2028 the Vex running it back I'll tell

20:34

you here's what I will say is I hope

20:36

that I'm not in the position to have to

20:38

run for president consider running for

20:39

president for this country if we're in

20:41

good shape as a country I there's not a

20:42

job I need to do I really don't I enjoy

20:45

doing I mean think about kind of stuff

20:47

I've taken up till after the campaign

20:48

re-engaging the creative side of my

20:50

brain taking on a lot of projects in the

20:52

private sector I'm an entrepreneur at

20:53

heart I'm a father of two sons I enjoy

20:56

nothing more in this world than raising

20:58

those two boys if this country I don't

21:01

believe this country requires somebody

21:03

to step up and actually make that

21:04

sacrifice if we're back to normal times

21:07

hell no I'm not running for president

21:09

but the only reason I would do it is if

21:11

I believ this country actually required

21:13

it so I'm hoping this as one man I'm

21:16

hoping that we're not there and if we

21:18

are there that means there's a job that

21:20

needs to be done because I'm doing it as

21:21

a father right I want my kids to grow up

21:23

in a country greater than the one that I

21:26

grew up in and that my parents came to I

21:28

hope that's not the position we're going

21:29

to be in in 2028 after four successful

21:32

years of Trump's presidency I hope that

21:34

this is a job that somebody else can do

21:35

to carry forward but if it's required

21:37

that means it's going to be urgent for

21:39

theut you mean to tell me the $400,000

21:41

year salary doesn't attct well now you

21:44

didn't mention that part now I got to I

21:46

got to

21:47

rethink last question with that the

21:49

amenities in that white house let say

21:51

hypothetically let's say hypothetically

21:53

Trump does lose hypothetically does that

21:56

mean all but certain you're going to

21:59

throw your I think if Trump loses this

22:00

country's in deep trouble right right

22:02

and and my work for this country all of

22:04

our work for this country can't wait for

22:05

even four years that's got to start

22:07

immediately and so that's the way I'm

22:08

approaching it even right now I think

22:10

we're skating on thin ice as a country

22:12

every one of us has to look ourselves in

22:14

the eye and say how are we going to make

22:15

a difference now not going to plant who

22:17

knows a four years from now is going to

22:18

look even the way it does today you got

22:20

to start right now and so that's the

22:22

urgency with I'm approaching this year I

22:24

think politics is not the only way to

22:27

drive positive change in the country

22:28

people forget that a lot of this is

22:30

going to happen through the private

22:31

sector through our educational system

22:33

I've lived the American dream be smarter

22:35

through philanthropy even I think there

22:37

are a lot of different ways that we must

22:39

be required to drive that change in the

22:41

country and so as I said the only chance

22:44

I would run for president in the future

22:46

is if I felt like the future of the

22:48

country depended on someone like me

22:50

stepping up to do it and let's hope

22:52

we're not there so let's talk about

22:55

current jobs let's just say the

22:57

president calls you

22:59

former president who's running right now

23:00

Trump calls he wins um VI I want you to

23:04

be the VP I want you to be uh after he

23:09

wins d a i want you to be Secretary of

23:12

Commerce I want you to be is there any

23:15

job you would say no to if he called you

23:18

to say I want you to help me with XYZ

23:20

job well look I think I think it would

23:22

be work more like a conversation right

23:24

in terms of where am I going to have

23:26

maximal impact and if he proposed a job

23:28

where I thought I wasn't going to be

23:30

effective I thought I wasn't going to

23:31

make best use of my skill set I've got a

23:33

relationship with Donald Trump who I

23:35

respect immensely where we're going to

23:36

have a conversation about that and

23:37

actually set up for maximal impact for

23:39

the country if if he knows who I am and

23:41

we've got to know each other really well

23:43

if after knowing all of that he would

23:45

ask me to be vice president or you know

23:47

let's you you brought up that example

23:49

let's just answer really honestly

23:50

anybody who cares about this country

23:52

who's aligned with his vision in the

23:53

Republican party today if they're asked

23:55

to be vice president is going to say yes

23:56

and has a responsibility to say yes and

23:58

so I think that that goes without saying

24:00

then you go one by one through the other

24:02

positions I think we know each other

24:03

well enough that I'm not going to get

24:05

some suggestion that wouldn't match up

24:08

with my skills or my interest but I do

24:10

think that one of the things I'm going

24:11

to be looking at is how do I maximize

24:14

impact for the country every one of us

24:16

has our own unique god-given gifts we

24:19

got five of us here six of us including

24:21

our our what's it Rob all right six of

24:24

us in this room blowing up on my neck

24:26

every one of us has different skills and

24:28

by the way he has different skills than

24:29

I do God knows I couldn't be doing what

24:30

he's doing I'll tell you that for sure

24:32

every one of us has our own unique

24:34

god-given gifts and we got to look

24:36

ourselves in the mirror and ask

24:38

ourselves how are we going to use those

24:40

gifts to do what is right for this

24:42

country in the short time that we're

24:44

given and so I'm going to do that think

24:46

about things that I talked about during

24:47

the campaign that were very important to

24:48

me I think fixing this issue of illegal

24:51

immigration and border security in this

24:53

country fundamental draining the swamp

24:55

actually got the mass deportation number

24:57

one of a million illegals who have

24:59

already been given their final orders of

25:01

removal and millions more who are in

25:03

this country illegally that's the first

25:04

mass deportation but the second Mass

25:07

deportation I care about is the mass

25:09

deportation of 3 million Federal

25:11

bureaucrats out of Washington DC so I

25:13

think those are both pretty important

25:15

areas that the next Administration and

25:17

the next president can score some pretty

25:19

quick wins on actually draining the

25:21

swamp actually gutting the bureaucracy

25:23

and actually fixing this border crisis

25:24

and the illegal immigration problem

25:26

those are things I've been focused on

25:27

over the last last year so there's no

25:29

job he calls you and going to say no to

25:31

well I think that I think there's

25:32

probably if he called me with the job

25:34

that I didn't think I was well suited to

25:36

help this country through I would tell

25:38

him that and I think that we would have

25:39

a conversation moving in a different

25:40

direction okay so let me ask you another

25:41

question have you ever technically

25:43

killed a

25:45

dog not only and WR about it it's

25:48

important people nowadays I never

25:50

thought people ask this question it's a

25:52

I I not I've not even non-technically

25:54

killed okay I just want to I'm a

25:55

vegetarian man he's I know that let me

25:58

stay on this year let me stay on this

25:59

year so here's another question for you

26:01

so we had a guy in Dallas billionaire

26:05

and one of his former CFOs ends up

26:08

working for us and this guy's like you

26:11

know everybody that was ever his CFO

26:13

they always got fired he says but I knew

26:15

when to quit before he fired me because

26:16

I didn't want to be part of the list of

26:17

getting fired right and I always been

26:20

like you know what what a way of

26:21

processing the issue you know quit

26:23

before you get

26:24

fired when you think about guys that

26:27

went and worked for for him that

26:28

accepted a job how do you feel about the

26:31

fact that say he gives you a job and

26:33

then a month 3 months 6 months 9 months

26:36

later he fires you how do you process

26:39

that with your chances of 2028 does that

26:41

fear at all consume your mind at all

26:44

okay not at all I'm just not wired that

26:47

way I mean Patrick I got to tell you

26:48

something because you're an entrepreneur

26:49

too but

26:50

sure first of all it's been a long time

26:53

since I've been in an employment

26:54

situation right I've been I I I word it

26:57

not for serving this country and

26:59

particularly Donald Trump in the

27:01

presidency I couldn't imagine working

27:03

for somebody period again in my life

27:04

told myself I wasn't going to do that

27:05

this would be working for a guy but this

27:07

this is working for the country and this

27:08

is that's what Donald Trump is doing

27:09

he's working for the country sure that's

27:11

what he's doing too you know who the

27:12

ultimate boss is in this job taxpayer

27:14

it's the people the citizens of this

27:15

country actually taxpayers but the

27:18

citizens of the United States of America

27:19

that's the ultimate boss so that's who

27:21

Donald Trump's going in to work for and

27:23

in serving and helping him do a good job

27:24

that's who I'm going to go in and work

27:26

for if if if he'd like to have me that

27:28

Administration and if he's successful

27:29

winning this election okay so that's the

27:31

way I think about it and so no I'm

27:34

not maybe it'd be more successful if I

27:36

were this way but I'm not wired this way

27:38

where you make these nested charts and

27:41

say okay well there's this scenario and

27:42

that thing could happen one of the

27:44

things I've discovered is every time

27:45

I've earlier phases of my life tried to

27:47

do that it never went according to that

27:49

plan anyway your plans are stupid

27:51

actually you got to have a you got to

27:52

have a broad strategy you got to have a

27:54

broad purpose but it once you sort of

27:56

get into the different tactics and try

27:57

to pretend like you know everything

27:59

that's going to happen when in fact you

28:00

have no idea none of us has any idea

28:03

what's going to happen I mean I don't

28:04

mean to say this in a in a morbid

28:07

way but we're at greater risk of

28:10

something terrible happening in this

28:13

country in the next year in the next

28:15

seven months then probably we've been in

28:17

any time in our adult lifetime probably

28:19

In Our Lifetime perod agre with got 10

28:20

million people who entered this country

28:21

illegally so we're sitting here I can't

28:23

be pontificating about oh here's the

28:25

position that I would like versus a

28:27

different position and I'm that's the

28:28

job I'm going to do that's going to set

28:29

me up for 2028 I'm worried we're going

28:31

to have serious bad stuff that goes down

28:33

in this country of a scale we haven't

28:35

seen in 20 years and how are we going to

28:37

prevent that from happening they've

28:38

warned us every week Christopher Ray's

28:39

warning that something's happening

28:40

Anthony blinkin it's like guys get ready

28:43

get ready and they keep showing all

28:44

these movies of Leave the World Behind

28:45

Civil War they're prepping us for

28:47

something big and they're going to say

28:48

we told you but what's important about

28:49

what you just said is the fact that

28:52

whatever the president chooses to hire

28:53

you for when you guys process it

28:56

together your game because it's America

28:58

first whatever America needs me today

29:00

I'm willing to do it's not me first it's

29:01

not Donald Trump first it's America

29:03

first that's what I love about Trump and

29:04

I think I'm going to try to spread that

29:06

across this country everybody I can so

29:07

while we're on this topic both of you

29:10

guys have a

29:11

reputation okay he has a reputation of

29:14

firing a lot of people he had a show

29:16

called Apprentice that he was firing

29:18

everybody in Jersey he said I can't wait

29:21

to go to president have you seen this

29:23

clip Rob or no I can't wait type in

29:26

Trump Biden your fire

29:28

type in Trump Biden you're fired right

29:31

and and and I'm going somewhere with

29:33

this so if you can find it I think

29:34

that's the one right there yeah that's

29:35

it if you can zoom in and play this clip

29:37

V watch this this is good go ahead I'm

29:40

sure nobody ever saw The Apprentice that

29:42

was a big hit that's a big hit that was

29:45

a big powerful hit but I'm going to look

29:48

at that guy and I'm going to say Joe

29:50

Biden you're the worst ever Joe Biden

29:52

you're fired get out of here you're

29:54

fired so he's he wants to fire Jo

29:58

how does it feel knowing you're the one

30:02

that fired R

30:04

McDaniel you so I'm a big fan of move

30:07

forward right you got a goal if if

30:10

somebody's in a job they shouldn't be in

30:11

and it's causing negative results I

30:14

believe in accountability but you know

30:16

what I made a promise which is I got

30:18

nothing against her personally zero

30:20

nothing against her personally I just

30:22

think she was not the right person for

30:22

the job so now that she's out of the way

30:24

yeah that's never wait a minute wait a

30:26

minute we I got nothing I know you don't

30:29

but it said it was wrong in the history

30:31

of theb please play this real he went

30:34

after everybody most epic Opening Ever

30:38

we we here 40 years 40 years from now a

30:42

kid is Professor is teaching poly in

30:44

some University they're going to show

30:45

this as a case study go is this the one

30:49

or is the shorter one this is 2 minutes

30:50

can you find is it I have the shorter

30:52

one where he just offers the remainder

30:53

of his time one that's what I want you

30:55

to do play that one right there go and

30:57

play this clip go ahead answer the

31:00

Republican establishment and speak the

31:02

truth I mean since Ron McDaniel took

31:04

over as chairwoman of the RNC in 2017 we

31:07

have lost 2018 2020 2022 no red wave

31:11

that never came we got trounced last

31:13

night in 2023 and I think that we have

31:16

to have accountability in our party for

31:18

that matter Ron if you want to come on

31:20

stage tonight you want to look the GOP

31:21

voters in the eye and tell them you

31:23

resign I will turn over my yield my time

31:26

to you and I but by the way I mean you

31:29

know you realize you indirectly I mean

31:32

you hurt uh uh unemployment rate cuz

31:34

somebody lost a job that day that that

31:36

was a publicly to do it the way you did

31:38

it V so I am I am unsparing when a job

31:43

needs to get done and somebody's

31:45

standing in the way I will stop at

31:47

nothing I'm a dog with a bone until we

31:49

get the job done but after that I'm not

31:51

looking back at the at the at the person

31:53

we moved out of the way I'm looking

31:54

forwarding yep exactly because we got we

31:56

got bigger obstacles along the way so

31:58

that's the way I'm wired but yes you can

32:00

count you have my commitment that

32:01

whatever I do in the future I'm not

32:03

going to I'm not going to play with on

32:04

this topic on this topic I've asked Kobe

32:06

this I've asked Shaq this question on

32:08

this topic you can't vote for yourself

32:11

right when he like hey put a starting

32:12

five together can I include myself no

32:14

you can't count your I don't know if you

32:15

can answer this question or not out of

32:17

all the people can Rob can you pull up

32:19

the the the the Vegas odds that Adam

32:22

invented can you pull that

32:24

up one the Vegas odds because this is a

32:27

qualifier now do you know which one I'm

32:29

talking about is this the one Adam or uh

32:31

there's a better one this is fine so you

32:34

got Tim Scott Doug beram uh Tulsi gabard

32:37

Alisa stefanic Rubio Carson VI Haley

32:41

DeSantis Huckabee G out of those who do

32:45

you think would be a if president Trump

32:48

is asking a question saying you know

32:50

give me counsel who do you think would

32:52

be a good VP selection what would you

32:53

say you look I mean In fairness I'm not

32:56

going to be with not going to be with

32:57

Trump for much of the rest of this week

32:58

right and so I I'm not going to publicly

33:00

air what my private counsel is to him

33:02

just as somebody who's asking me for

33:03

actual advice I'm not maybe not Trump

33:05

asking maybe I'm asking you're like I'm

33:06

going to Vegas I'm saying hey vve who

33:08

would be a good you know person to bet

33:10

on if I'm going to Vegas tomor I'll say

33:11

some I'll say I'll say a few good things

33:12

about a couple of people on this list

33:14

right somebody I got to know pretty

33:15

recently is Ben Carson he is somebody

33:18

who so he came to Columbus Ohio it's my

33:21

hometown I got I met him for the first

33:22

time there we've done podcast and

33:23

everything together right but I will

33:25

tell you that he is some who my wife

33:28

she's a physician she is a throat

33:31

surgeon when she was in undergrad there

33:34

was somebody who visited her when she

33:35

was at Yale and gave an inspiring talk

33:38

to a small group on why he became a

33:41

surgeon that man was Ben Carson get out

33:42

of here right so I mean my wife she's

33:44

excellent at what she does she's one of

33:47

I can only imagine how many people that

33:49

man's actually given inspiration to and

33:51

the funny thing is he wasn't supposed to

33:52

be a good student right he was a guy who

33:54

never victimized himself based on his

33:57

skin color but he wasn't the best in his

33:59

class he told me for a while until he

34:01

actually studied and got the heck ahead

34:03

and so I like that spirit and I like the

34:05

fact that there's a role for

34:07

everybody would I have voted for Ben

34:11

Carson over Donald Trump in a

34:12

presidential primary when they ran

34:13

against each other no that's a different

34:15

story but would do I believe that he is

34:18

somebody whose heart is in the right

34:19

place and who is learned a lot and has a

34:22

level of wisdom and could actually

34:24

provide a level of counsel to somebody

34:26

in executive position absolutely I do

34:28

and has he given inspiration to a lot of

34:29

people including my wife including to me

34:31

I think I think I would say that about

34:33

him right now who's going to who's going

34:34

to be the best vice president there's

34:35

some other people on that list too I

34:37

hadn't seen that list by the way so

34:38

that's interesting that you brought it

34:39

up I think that's up to each chief

34:42

executive to decide you don't say okay

34:44

who's the CEO going to hire in a role

34:46

and then somebody armchair

34:47

quarterbacking that decision so I've got

34:49

good things to say about a number of

34:50

people on this list but I just picked

34:51

Ben because I met him recently and he's

34:53

a he's a truly good-hearted man who

34:55

loves this country and I think is

34:56

different I also have a love of

34:59

Outsiders I don't like people who grew

35:00

up in the I don't like when people who

35:03

grew up in politics remain in that

35:05

festering swamp of politics so I think

35:08

it's good when you got somebody who's

35:09

been a surgeon or somebody who's been a

35:10

businessman coming in from the outside

35:12

to shake things up what do you think

35:14

about Tulsi look I like Tulsi because

35:16

she's an independent thinker actually

35:18

she's somebody who tell you a funny

35:20

story about uh Dy we had we were at a

35:23

dinner

35:24

recently I'm sure I hope all these

35:25

people don't mind me just sharing these

35:27

these stories but whatever it's kind of

35:28

fun we were at a Mexican restaurant in

35:30

uh Texas and the funny thing about Tulsi

35:33

is so I'm usually in this position okay

35:35

where we go to Mexican restaurant I told

35:37

you I didn't kill the dog you asked me

35:38

but I'm vegetarian right so we've done

35:40

this we've done this when you and I have

35:41

had lunch together right so somebody

35:42

will come by and I was like oh is this

35:44

you know is this thing vegetarian is

35:46

this thing veget it's kind of holds up

35:47

the whole table it's a little bit

35:48

inconvenient but whatever I'm raised

35:50

that way it's part of my conviction and

35:52

so I do it anyway this time we're going

35:54

around the table and we're at a Mexican

35:55

restaurant and there's all the usual

35:57

questions oh is your rice vegetarian is

35:59

your beans vegetarian I'm not the one

36:00

asking the questions it's tulsy gabard

36:02

and so I got to just say okay good she

36:03

she did all the hard work I said you

36:05

know I'm going to have what she's

36:07

having which is funny but I respected

36:09

that because it was it still showed

36:11

somebody who say what you will about the

36:12

conviction at least has some conviction

36:15

I also love the fact that she has been

36:16

outspoken against a lot of the foreign

36:18

intervention that hasn't best served

36:20

this country and I think that she is in

36:23

her heart as best I can tell somebody

36:25

who is against unnecessary War I share

36:28

that in common I think Donald Trump

36:29

shares that in common I think it's a

36:31

beautiful thing that we could use more

36:33

of in both parties frankly and so you

36:35

know I've got positive things to say

36:36

about a lot of people on that list in

36:38

terms of who's as a vice president role

36:41

that's a decision that one man should

36:43

gets to make and that's the person who's

36:45

the president which is hopefully let ask

36:46

your question though so with with the an

36:47

culture and you know and the position

36:49

that you said about you know the magas

36:50

and the people the 7% low percent how

36:53

much if VI if Trump picks Vive to be the

36:56

vice president how much does that help

36:58

him for the 2028 election like where

37:01

does that crowd go oh if P if if he's

37:04

bringing him as vice president then

37:05

we're 100% going all in instead of the

37:08

an that's it like I'm just curious how

37:09

much you think that that shifts if Trump

37:11

actually puts him as vice president and

37:14

V becomes a vice president and for four

37:15

years they see these two just go after

37:17

the Deep State go after everybody flip

37:19

everybody off and like this is America

37:20

First what's up how much do those people

37:22

say you know what I don't care he could

37:24

be an from anywhere we're going for him

37:27

Tom what do you think

37:28

think I this fascinating me I'm watching

37:31

the analyst here know I I'd love to see

37:34

him pick you uh for all the reasons that

37:36

I think I articulated once before um and

37:39

this is this is sincere that is a

37:41

qualified list there tulsi's been on the

37:43

podcast we've talked to her we we know

37:45

some of these people and so we've been

37:47

able to do a little bit more than just a

37:49

than just a you know inspection well

37:52

watching them on TV we we've met them

37:54

and you know what you are articul you

37:57

are stick smart I would love to see my

38:01

personal hope and dream was that if you

38:03

weren't VP you'd be AG because I think

38:05

an attorney general that just that just

38:07

would cut through it um would be strong

38:10

but I I think you would absolutely be a

38:14

benefit to the country because you're no

38:16

BS and you're really smart and you're

38:18

driven on it and and that's what I think

38:20

and I think right now America's just

38:22

kind of playing a parlor game of who's

38:24

going to be where and and Trump's

38:26

hopefully taking really great Council

38:27

from really great people and I'm glad

38:29

you'll be with them this week but but

38:30

what time but how much do you think

38:31

helps diplomatic time I'm saying real

38:35

answer how much of that percentage that

38:36

they said what like 7% or whatever how

38:38

much do you think that that shifts and

38:40

they just say listen Trump has some SVP

38:42

once Trump is done we don't everybody's

38:44

going to vivec how much you think that

38:46

percentage goes of his chances to be the

38:48

president oh I I I think it goes a lot I

38:50

think I think it move it as much as 50%

38:52

because I think any rational person has

38:55

to look at both men that are currently

38:57

the presumptive candidates and say the

39:00

VP this time is very important on an

39:03

Actuarial basis yeah

39:05

well just to cut through the Clutter

39:07

here the VP pick will be the next

39:09

leading candidate for the presidency in

39:11

2028 just to cut through that but on

39:13

this topic think so I just yeah I mean I

39:16

I'm just in the camp where I'm I respect

39:18

the people who have a lot of conviction

39:20

about telling something in the future

39:22

I'm actually one of the things I found

39:24

is I'm very good at understanding what

39:25

my convictions are in the present

39:28

I'm not particularly good at predicting

39:30

oneoff facts in the future right so I I

39:32

stick to the business that I'm best at

39:33

which is identifying my own convictions

39:35

and following them but I'm finding the

39:37

conversation fascinating I got say on

39:39

this list you've shared the stage with

39:40

you know many people on this list I know

39:42

you're a vegetarian VC but there's only

39:45

one person you had full-on beef with and

39:48

that is Nikki Haley yeah you see her

39:50

odds here thoughts on Nikki thoughts on

39:52

her as a VP and was that beef actual

39:57

because she at one point like it got

39:59

personal what was that experience yeah I

40:01

think it was it was interesting I don't

40:02

think I've um I don't think I've talked

40:05

about this one before either my first

40:06

time meeting Nikki Haley was actually

40:08

her reaching out to me proactively when

40:11

very few people in this country know who

40:12

I was to set up a call with me MH I had

40:15

I was just rolling out my book woke in

40:18

and I got to give her some credit I mean

40:19

my understanding is apparently I mean I

40:23

only know the excerpts that have come

40:24

out from Christin H's book but

40:24

apparently she reached out to chrisy H

40:26

too this is somebody who has has been

40:27

for a long time identifying who are

40:30

going to be the potential players in the

40:31

future this is long before I thought of

40:33

myself as even a player in politics and

40:35

so she set up a half hour Zoom call

40:38

congratulated me on what a good job I

40:39

was said this is this is interesting I

40:42

wonder what's going on there so I think

40:44

that I always had a I will tell you it

40:46

left me a little skeptical actually was

40:48

the response that I had because I was so

40:50

flat a lot of things that were said to

40:51

flatter me someone proactively reached

40:53

out to have a conversation I'm a guy who

40:55

not many people have heard of I said

40:57

what was the objective there right I was

40:58

a little bit I was a little bit cynical

41:01

and I think that one of the things I

41:02

learned is this isn't specific to her

41:05

but I have I'm basically the opposite of

41:09

what I've observed many professional

41:10

politicians to be right many

41:12

professional politicians are all about

41:15

trying to figure out what you want to

41:17

hear and then telling you more of that

41:20

and I'm in the business of identifying

41:22

what my own convictions are as human

41:25

beings have have some of those changed

41:26

or you believe 10 years ago the same as

41:28

you believe today no but what are my

41:30

convictions what are my most deeply held

41:32

convictions today and how do I stand for

41:34

them and so when I look at people who

41:36

have grown up in that sport of

41:38

professional politics and then Embrace

41:40

policies that sometimes align with their

41:42

own self-interest but the expense of the

41:44

country yeah that really does get under

41:46

my skin and so you know I think a lot of

41:49

the divide that you saw between me and

41:52

Nikki on the debate stage was grounded

41:53

in deep-seated policy differences

41:55

deep-seated differences in what a

41:57

politician and a public figure and a

41:59

leader of a country is supposed to be is

42:02

it somebody who has very carefully

42:04

crafted and plann what they're supposed

42:06

to say and then carefully rolls that out

42:08

through careful rigors of pole testing

42:10

and consultant vetting or is it somebody

42:12

who's sharing their honest convictions

42:14

is it somebody who believes the sole

42:16

role of a public servant is to S serve

42:18

the public or that it's okay to Serve

42:20

Yourself along the way those are

42:21

fundamental ideological divides and I

42:23

think that's what you saw spilling over

42:25

there a little bit you also saw I think

42:27

a little bit of the chess game of

42:28

candidates during the primaries right

42:30

yeah you make alliances and you go after

42:32

people that are perceptibly starting to

42:34

roll up in the polls and she and Chris

42:37

Christie did that so there's also a

42:39

little of that going on right yeah we

42:40

were watching it during the break them

42:42

talking to each other yeah and by the

42:44

way what do you think the Santa stands

42:46

now now that everything is over with and

42:48

in the breaks I would watch you always

42:50

go to him to speak with them I think we

42:52

were standing by each other most of the

42:53

time that was sort of the but it was

42:55

always you trying to find a way

42:57

wouldn't engage yeah I think I think um

43:01

there's one or two instances I think

43:03

there was I mean I try to be polite

43:04

right I think um I think he was saying

43:07

something like mnra vaccine and I just

43:09

wanted to be respectful I don't want to

43:11

call him out on stage for it but it's

43:12

you know I told him it's yeah I mean

43:14

just small stuff right uh it's friendly

43:16

you know friendly little tip here and

43:18

there I remember that was one of the

43:19

instances where are you guys good do you

43:20

guys communicate or not at all we've I

43:22

don't think we've I don't think we've

43:24

communicated since the campaign I saw

43:25

him at NASCAR I remember that went to

43:27

Daytona 500 we were both in the uh

43:29

pregame pregame routine they had um

43:32

maybe I've seen them once or twice but I

43:34

I think I've got no particular beef with

43:36

with Ron I think that no relationship

43:38

either like you guys haven't broke bread

43:39

had dinner we don't there's other people

43:41

I'm text message relationship with you

43:43

know but not him I I we don't we never

43:46

exchange numbers but I will say that

43:48

backstage it was always it was always

43:50

relatively relatively courtious they got

43:52

kids of the same age you know I think

43:53

aorv and Casey sat next to each other at

43:55

some of the debates and so we've got

43:57

we've got you know no beef there okay

43:59

let's go to the next topic next topic

44:00

Michael Cohen Rob if you want to put I

44:02

don't know if you got any of the clips

44:03

or not Michael Cohen testifies Trump's

44:06

uh backed payments to suppress news that

44:09

could hurt 2016 campaign this is a

44:11

reuter story and then he comes out and

44:14

you know he says what he says Adam if

44:16

I'm not mistaken What's the phrase that

44:17

he used he said just do it regarding the

44:20

hush money payments he can punch in on

44:22

that told him to he used the

44:25

Nike what's been so Michael K testified

44:28

that he Donald Trump National choir

44:29

publisher David pecker collaborated to

44:31

suppress negative stories damag in Trump

44:32

2016 campaign exemplified by $130,000

44:36

stormmy Daniels uh to silence her about

44:39

a sexual encounter she alleged cooh and

44:40

recounted Trump's uh directive to

44:42

prevent the release of Ken mcdougall's

44:44

story of an affair with the trumps

44:45

asking so what is he going to be

44:47

testifying tomorrow too apparently he's

44:49

going to he just I'm going to be there

44:50

tomorrow I'll be there tomorrow really

44:51

you're in the coure I'm going to the

44:52

courtroom tomorrow fantastic yeah so but

44:55

by the way what what do you think about

44:56

all all of this with everything that's

44:58

going on here how much of this is

45:00

helping how much of this is hurting how

45:01

are you processing this yeah I mean I'm

45:04

not following the dayto day obviously as

45:06

the trials running but I read about the

45:08

summaries in the evening and I wanted to

45:09

go tomorrow more just as a as a friend

45:12

and now supporter of trump to be able to

45:15

actually show support by being present

45:18

not you know in anyone's any other

45:19

capacity other than my own but I will

45:22

say that every day this trial precedes

45:25

the trend that I've seen I didn't today

45:27

but up to today all we've seen is one

45:30

more layer of the onion of how the whole

45:32

thing's a charade right if you think

45:34

about

45:36

this imagine if a good way to imagine

45:39

whether something's a politicized

45:40

prosecution is right because everyone's

45:42

going to be you know MSNBC has their

45:44

histrionic points and then they would

45:45

look at people who are Defenders of

45:47

trump like myself as being partisans on

45:49

the other side here's a good litmus test

45:52

okay if the prosecution's theory of the

45:54

case said you did something wrong m what

45:57

if you had done the exact opposite thing

46:00

okay okay let's let's play that out then

46:02

that should mean you did not do

46:03

something wrong right let's let's try

46:04

that on this set of facts on this set of

46:06

facts the basic theory of the case is

46:08

the prosecution says in order for them

46:10

to charge this as a felony that Donald

46:13

Trump's payment to Stormy Daniels should

46:16

have been recorded as a campaign

46:19

contribution that's the heart of the

46:20

case without that they couldn't charge

46:22

this as a felony it would only be a

46:23

misdemeanor that's outlive the statute

46:25

of limitations the falsifying business

46:26

records it's outside the statute of

46:27

limitations it's a misdemeanor not a

46:29

felony the only basis for this being a

46:30

felony is if there's a different

46:31

underlying crime which what they allege

46:34

is that he made effectively a campaign

46:36

contribution without it being recorded

46:38

as such so now apply my test if the

46:41

prosecution says that's the thing you

46:42

did and it's wrong imagine you did the

46:44

exact opposite what would the exact

46:47

opposite be the exact opposite would be

46:49

Donald Trump using campaign funds to

46:52

make a personal hush money

46:54

payment in that scenario I have no doubt

46:57

these people would be going after him

46:59

and they would have a much stronger case

47:01

in that scenario so now think about it

47:03

if he did thing a right just got to

47:06

break the step he did thing a and you

47:08

said that's wrong let's say he did the

47:09

exact opposite of thing a and did thing

47:11

B and you would have an even stronger

47:14

case for him then that means you were

47:16

going to get him no matter what so that

47:18

is the proof that this is a politicized

47:21

persecution through prosecution I think

47:23

everybody kind of knows it in their

47:24

bones but you got to just see it damn

47:26

you do damned if you don't literally

47:28

they're going to get him going or get

47:29

him coming and that I think is the

47:31

airtight proof that this thing is a sham

47:34

it's been a sham since day one it's

47:36

revealed itself to be a sham throughout

47:38

the course of this trial and I think it

47:39

will be a stain on the history of our

47:42

country if this man is convicted in the

47:45

middle of a presidential election on the

47:47

back of these bogus charges that's what

47:49

I believe it's so embarrassing here's

47:50

what CNM was saying to go ahead and play

47:52

this

47:54

Rob but I've never seen a witness who

47:56

has lied to Congress who's lied in court

47:58

who's lied to the IRS who's lied to the

48:00

southern district of New York who lied

48:01

to his Banker you know the entire

48:03

prosecution witness team has been lied

48:05

to by Michael Cohen I mean this is

48:08

CNN this is not Fox News saying this I'm

48:11

shocked can you imagine like your

48:13

friends with Michael Cohen you go out to

48:14

dinner hey Michael what I'm about to

48:16

tell you right now you can't tell

48:16

anybody oh trust me I'm not telling

48:18

nobody oh he's the worst half the

48:20

world's going to find out what you're

48:21

doing with so and they're using Michael

48:24

cooh what type of credibility does he

48:26

have left to even get up there where

48:28

they're like yeah this guy's a credible

48:30

doesn't that actually hurt them instead

48:32

of help them you would think but you

48:34

know that you could say that about this

48:36

whole trial that's exactly the effect

48:37

it's had wouldn't that hurt them rather

48:38

than help them to Levy false charges

48:41

against a former US president and that

48:42

has been the effect that it's had I

48:44

think a lot of people are saying that

48:46

you know what do I agree with everything

48:47

Donald Trump has ever said in his life

48:48

no did I vote for him in 2020 some of

48:51

them may say no but do I believe that it

48:53

is wrong for a party in power to use the

48:55

powers of prosecu U to try to lock up

48:58

their political opponents in the middle

48:59

of an election that's foundational stuff

49:02

that's the stuff of tearing down our

49:03

democracy and so a lot of those people

49:05

are actually coming Trump's way this

49:07

year and for good reason and I think

49:09

that's good for the country and so

49:10

wouldn't this be expected to work

49:11

against them that's effectively what

49:13

you've seen at every step of the way so

49:15

yeah it's no surprise it would apply to

49:17

this one too yeah were you going to say

49:19

something or no yeah well if Trump did

49:22

go to jail I think 80% of Trump's base

49:25

uh said they would vote for him no

49:26

matter matter what 4% said that they

49:29

would it would change their vote 16%

49:32

would reconsider how much would it help

49:34

Trump for him to actually go to jail cuz

49:36

Pat made a very impassionate case I

49:38

don't know a week ago like send him to

49:40

jail lock him up see what happens what

49:42

are your thoughts I think it would be

49:44

devastating for the country I think it

49:46

would be embarrassing for the United

49:47

States of America that other countries

49:49

would look at us and see a party in

49:52

power and a regime that locks up a

49:55

political opponent on fous charges if

49:57

this had happened in any other country

49:59

we'd call it a Banana Republic an

50:00

autocracy so I would be ashamed as an

50:03

American as a citizen of this nation I

50:04

would be ashamed if that's what happens

50:07

but electorally I think that it would

50:09

have the effect of doing the thing that

50:11

we're already on the trajectory to do

50:12

which is to elect Donald Trump with a

50:14

decisive mandate and I do think this has

50:17

to be a decisive mandate 50.1 isn't

50:20

going to cut it this time a decisive win

50:23

minus some Shenanigans is still a

50:25

decisive Victory right and so I think

50:26

that's why a landslide is required and I

50:28

think a landslide is very well what

50:30

they're setting us up for this time

50:31

around and and and the other case uh

50:33

vivec the one that uh the FBI planted

50:35

documents at Mar Lago Jack Smith an FBI

50:38

agent involved apparently they took

50:39

photos of uh secret document uh the

50:43

cover letters on top of them and then

50:45

the case was suspended indefinitely it's

50:46

like every single one of these is a sham

50:49

it's all it's all BS so V my thing is

50:52

this let's say God willing he beats all

50:54

these you know he doesn't get arrested

50:55

he he gets in that same swamp VC those

50:58

same people these same judges these same

51:01

they're all still going to be there I

51:02

understand trying to drain the swamp but

51:04

that swamp you drain it that's getting

51:06

filled right back up you know what I

51:07

mean how how does he fight that I mean

51:09

the way I look at it is it's like a

51:11

eight-headed Hydra okay it's like a

51:13

monster and you cut off one of the heads

51:14

it grows right back you got to slay the

51:17

beast at its core right and so this is

51:19

going to require doing the hard thing

51:23

the easy thing to do is to say I'm going

51:24

to fire Christopher Ray and replace I'm

51:26

going to fire the head of this agency or

51:28

replace him I think the harder thing is

51:31

to say we're actually going to get in

51:32

there and shut it down actually and is

51:35

there some risk to doing this of course

51:37

there is right there's efficiency risk

51:39

is there going to be some inconveniences

51:40

from shutting down agencies that are

51:42

presumably doing at least some important

51:44

work many of them aren't but even if you

51:46

presume there's one iota important work

51:47

they're doing is there some

51:49

inconvenience yes but you're always

51:50

taking a risk sometimes the risk is that

51:53

you don't cut enough fat well the

51:55

opposite of that risk can't be oh I'm

51:57

just going to cut exactly the amount

51:58

needed no you can't say you're going to

51:59

do that the opposite risk you're taking

52:01

is you cut so much that you cut some

52:02

muscle so which risk are you going to

52:04

take I take the risk of now the point in

52:07

our country's history that we live in

52:08

things have gotten so dire I will take

52:11

the risk of cutting some muscle and

52:12

building back what we overcut than the

52:15

risk of not cutting enough why do I say

52:18

that because we've seen what the other

52:18

model looks like the thing just Grows

52:20

Right

52:21

Back and and this is where I think the

52:23

Republican Party struggles a little bit

52:25

right we talk big game as a party about

52:28

the weaponization of government but push

52:30

comes to shove what do you do

52:32

reauthorize fisa 702 not even

52:34

reauthorize it that's a mistake expand

52:36

it that's what they did to give that

52:39

very government the tools of Greater

52:40

weaponization that you were once going

52:42

on cable television on evening to

52:43

complain about okay you have Republicans

52:45

that will complain about the grow

52:47

overgrowth of the administrative state

52:49

yet actually vote to authorize the

52:50

expansion of those same agencies and so

52:54

I think that the partisan

52:57

jockeying here the partisan Jousting is

53:00

really a little bit of theater I I don't

53:03

think that Republicans most of them at

53:05

least have been overly serious about

53:07

actually draining the swamp about

53:09

actually gutting the bureaucracy I don't

53:11

think they've even been very serious

53:12

about actually sealing the Border or

53:14

dealing with mass migration in this

53:15

country because if you had a party that

53:18

does have a majority of the house now

53:19

and has had majorities of the House and

53:21

Senate for a lot of the last 20 years we

53:24

would not be where we are right now and

53:26

so yeah I know a lot of people in the

53:27

business of just claiming the but the

53:30

radical Biden agenda and I complain

53:31

about that plenty myself as well but if

53:34

we want to actually have the result in

53:36

2024 that we should have we can't just

53:39

be complaining about the other side we

53:41

got to stand for our own vision and what

53:43

we actually stand for that's why we

53:46

didn't have the Red Wave in 2022 it

53:48

wasn't because of abortion it wasn't

53:50

because of trump it was because the

53:51

Republicans got lazy and all we would do

53:53

is complain about the radical Biden

53:55

agenda that's not enough

53:57

we got to actually stand by our own

53:58

convictions and say here are the risks

54:00

we're willing to take to save this

54:01

country because if we don't we're not

54:03

going to have a country left this is

54:05

what we stand for right and I think for

54:08

cutting those agencies for 3 million

54:09

Federal bureaucrats being firing for

54:11

actually moving our own military to our

54:13

own Southern border and completing the

54:14

wall and ending Birthright citizenship

54:17

for the kids of illegals and yes it's

54:19

logic if you've had the largest mass

54:21

influx of illegal migrants in American

54:24

history then it makes sense that you

54:26

have the largest mass deportation in

54:28

American history those are the kinds of

54:29

things we got to stand by which you know

54:32

what's funny some people may say are

54:33

those extreme

54:35

policies to the contrary you go to

54:38

places like the south side of Chicago

54:39

you go to the inner cities across this

54:41

country talking about those border

54:43

policies talking about actually funding

54:44

American causes versus foreign interests

54:47

in places like Ukraine most people

54:50

actually even on the left in the inner

54:52

cities are actually sympathetic to

54:54

Republicans who are willing to stake out

54:55

those actual positions and so that's the

54:58

opportunity I see and I hope we don't

54:59

squander it I got a I got a question I

55:01

want to get to because one of the things

55:03

you're noticing with the Democratic

55:04

party they seem to be very United where

55:07

Republicans they seem to be competing

55:10

against each other because there's an

55:11

element of them I can do it on my own I

55:13

don't need you you know this versus

55:15

Democrats like no no no we need against

55:17

each other because the enem is on the

55:18

other side sometimes you see a little

55:20

bit of a civil war on the left but you

55:21

see more of it on the Republican side

55:22

than the Democratic side Trump just

55:25

recently said said this is a the part of

55:27

his speech Donald Trump I support

55:30

Israel's right to win its war on terror

55:33

okay so this is a uh do you have the

55:35

video Rob is I go and play this clip

55:38

Joe's action is one of the worst

55:39

betrayals of an American Ally in the

55:41

history of our country I support

55:44

Israel's right to win its war on terror

55:47

is that okay I don't know I don't know

55:50

if that's good or bad politically I

55:51

don't care you got to do what's right

55:54

you got it was a terrible attack October

55:56

7th was a terrible attack I don't know

55:58

it's probably bad politically but I

56:00

don't care you have to do the right

56:01

thing there would there would have been

56:03

no war in Gaza with me in the White

56:05

House there would not have even been a

56:07

chance you know Iran was broke when I

56:09

was President I said if you buy oil

56:12

anybody buys oil from Iran they can't do

56:14

business with the United States they

56:15

were totally broke now they have $250

56:18

billion they made it all in 3 and half

56:20

years do you agree with them so look I

56:24

think every nation has an absolute right

56:25

to defend itself and Israel does too I

56:28

think that that's a different point from

56:29

whether or not the United States should

56:31

be meddling in other people's business

56:32

around the world you take a look at

56:34

what's going on in Armenia aeran right

56:37

where's the United States tackling that

56:39

crisis right selective selective my

56:42

myopia here you got this I don't know

56:45

how deep you want to go to this but here

56:47

you've got the United States staying

56:49

seemingly silent as you got azerbijan

56:51

displacing 120,000 Armenian Christians

56:54

from the nagoro kabak region which since

56:57

the early 1990s has been agreed this is

56:59

exactly where they're allowed to be but

57:01

it's not just that the United States is

57:02

staying silent because that would be

57:04

hypocritical relative to the

57:05

intervention in other parts of the world

57:06

it's that the United States is funding

57:08

azerbijan to actually commit those

57:11

atrocities the United States have been

57:12

funding this Behavior so I could go on

57:14

for just a list of hypocrisies in other

57:16

parts of the world that we ignore but we

57:18

go into certain areas where we say hey

57:20

the US has to intervene here when in

57:22

fact it's all I think I think it's all

57:24

been a product of coherent foreign

57:26

policy coming out of both political

57:29

parties and so I come back to First

57:30

principles every nation has an absolute

57:33

right to defend itself and its own

57:35

borders the United States of America is

57:37

failing to do that right now I think the

57:39

United States of America is patently

57:40

failing to defend our own borders and

57:42

that's a big problem for us but on the

57:43

flip side Israel had a breach of its own

57:46

borders and by the way people aren't

57:48

focused on this question but I think

57:49

it's a legitimate one what the hell

57:52

happened there I mean that was

57:53

ridiculous it was it was a it was a

57:55

ridiculous failure of border security if

57:57

that could happen in Israel that could

57:58

happen right here in the United States

57:59

of America that should be our wakeup

58:01

call but if they did have their border

58:03

security breached if that was us in the

58:04

United States I wouldn't want some other

58:06

country telling me that I can't actually

58:08

defend my own Nation well I don't think

58:10

that Israel should be taking slack from

58:11

other people who say that they're going

58:13

to micromanage how Israel responds to

58:15

its own attack as well that's the way I

58:17

look at it did you think this this was

58:19

going to be

58:20

a um you know we're looking at the dates

58:24

of when George Floyd happened I think

58:25

it's May 25th of 2020 we've been talking

58:28

about that a lot lately where the day he

58:31

got shot not the shot the day he got

58:32

killed what is it 8 minutes and 46

58:34

seconds or 9 minutes and 46 seconds

58:36

whatever the time was that happened May

58:39

26th of I think he died May 25th but the

58:42

protest start on May 26th if I'm not

58:45

mistaken so if you go to it the fouryear

58:49

anniversary is coming up it's two weeks

58:51

from now yeah how much it is pro-israel

58:55

pro Palestine G Seinfeld if he can show

58:57

this he's simply the keynote speaker

58:59

graduating class of Duke right and he's

59:02

up there he's about to get up there on

59:04

stage you just had the video a minute

59:05

ago Rob if you Jerry Seinfeld he's at

59:07

the um it shows as one of your yellow

59:10

videos so I think you may have it uh uh

59:13

no the walk out right there so this is

59:15

him yeah this is Duke if you can play

59:17

the

59:20

audio and the pro Palestine students get

59:24

up and they're simply

59:26

walking out now this is Duke University

59:29

this isn't Berkeley this isn't a lot of

59:32

times like listen to the boo though

59:34

who's the guy that played here gr H

59:36

played for Duke right what was one of

59:38

theti but you know what nickname they

59:40

had for GR when he played for Duke and I

59:42

think it was Jaylen Rose that said kid

59:44

yeah black kids that play at uh uh Duke

59:46

they're he gave them a n Uncle Tom I

59:49

don't know what num name they gave him

59:50

but there was something like and I don't

59:51

know if it's Jaylen Rose but that was

59:53

the reputation anybody that goes to Duke

59:56

you're a Republican or you're

59:57

conservative so this has happened on a

59:58

campus like this so Pro Palestine pro

60:01

Israel how much of this division you

60:04

think is intentional how much of it is

60:07

real how much of it is divisive how much

60:09

of it is manipulation you know because

60:11

it's bleeding into businesses it's

60:13

bleeding into universities it's bleeding

60:14

into families it's bleeding in media

60:16

network is it real is it fake is it

60:19

intentional so I think couple things

60:20

there such an interesting topic here one

60:24

is I i' like to start with just facts

60:27

when I heard about the description of

60:29

this video I was say hey let me watch

60:31

the video the video actually surprised

60:33

me right I imagined like when it was

60:35

this student walk out from duke I was

60:37

imagining like many of those students

60:39

flooding out what do you see there you

60:41

see like a small trickle of people

60:43

holding a flag they probably don't even

60:45

know what it is walking out and most of

60:46

them are being booed as they're doing it

60:48

for interrupting the commencement you

60:49

saw the same thing at University of

60:50

Michigan actually a fringe minority as

60:53

they're being removed from disrupting

60:54

the proceedings you have upros in the

60:56

audience so so I think this the first

60:58

thing to observe is what you're seeing

61:01

first of all is not some tyranny of the

61:03

majority it is a tyranny of The Fringe

61:06

minority actually that's the first

61:07

observation the second observation is

61:09

now let's double click on that Minority

61:11

right that Fringe minority it'd be one

61:14

thing Patrick if

61:16

we talked to those people they had a

61:20

deep historical understanding of dating

61:23

back to not only 1960 or 1940 but dating

61:26

back to 0 or 200 BC and make a

61:30

historical case for why this land does

61:32

not belong to Israel and deserves to be

61:34

autonomous and from The River To The Sea

61:36

could they name which river and which

61:37

sea that'd be one thing that's not what

61:40

we're talking about here we're talking

61:42

about a group of students and it's not

61:45

just students but it's a

61:46

generation that is largely lost and I

61:50

don't say that insulting anybody I say

61:52

it in some ways regretting our own

61:55

failures as the generation that came

61:56

before them to give them purpose and

61:58

meaning in this country the very people

62:01

who

62:01

were protesting after George Floyd's

62:04

death and by then what were we talking

62:06

about violent riots I mean that was

62:08

actually one of the interesting things

62:10

is you're seeing a lot more media

62:11

attenion here you didn't get a lot of

62:13

media attention in 2020 when they were

62:15

bashing in storefronts in the inner city

62:17

across and burning down cities in places

62:20

like Minneapolis and Wisconsin that

62:21

didn't make the news in the way that

62:23

this is right now which is interesting

62:24

but it's many of the same people or the

62:25

same kinds of people adopting this cause

62:27

as their latest cause dour and so what

62:30

do I think is going on it's a tyranny of

62:31

The Fringe minority most of the people

62:33

in that Fringe minority aren't actually

62:35

against what they claim to be against

62:37

it's just that they don't even know what

62:38

they actually stand for they are lost

62:41

some of them on these campuses you could

62:43

even listen to some of the tapes in the

62:44

last few months they were chanting into

62:47

F that's they thought they were chanting

62:49

but they were actually chanting infit

62:51

which is not even a word right so

62:52

they're chanting stuff they don't even

62:54

know what it means right they're hungry

62:56

to be part of something bigger than

62:58

themselves yet they can't even answer

63:00

what it means to be an American and and

63:02

one thing I will say

63:04

is you got one thing that I gotta be

63:07

honest annoys me a little bit is I was

63:09

calling a lot of this stuff out back

63:10

when I wrote my book woken several years

63:13

ago my publisher and the people who were

63:15

advising me at the time were wondering

63:16

whether people would even know the word

63:18

woke actually like certainly friends

63:20

before I submitted to the publisher said

63:21

that might be your biggest problem they

63:22

don't even know what that title is and I

63:24

had people who are opposed to what I was

63:26

saying then friends in New York City

63:27

okay would say hey wait isn't that a

63:29

little bit too controversial aren't you

63:30

being too dismissive of concerns about

63:32

systemic racism now many of those same

63:35

people are the ones losing their minds

63:37

over the context of these campus

63:39

protests where for me my question is

63:41

where were you asleep at the switch

63:43

three years ago now In fairness as we

63:45

said people can change their minds and

63:47

different people can wake up to things

63:50

that they didn't see before so I'm never

63:51

going to fault somebody for evolving

63:52

their views but I do think that there is

63:55

some something odd going on where people

63:57

are refusing to get to the root cause

63:59

here when it touches a cause that they

64:01

care about then you know you might see

64:03

certain people up in arms but we got to

64:05

get to First principles where this woke

64:06

stuff was wrong when it was driving the

64:09

bashing in of stores in the interseed in

64:10

2020 it's wrong now when you have

64:12

College commencement proceedings being

64:14

being disrupted and Jewish students not

64:16

feeling safe to go to their classes but

64:18

do it grounded in the first principles

64:20

in the first place and I think we can

64:22

all do a better job of that in this

64:23

country what would president VC ramas

64:26

Swami do to create a ceasefire at this

64:28

point because they're shouting ceasefire

64:30

they're shouting ceasefire a lot of

64:32

these kids River to the Sea they have no

64:34

clue what it is they can't spell anap I

64:36

know this very well um there was a

64:39

ceasefire October 6th October 7th Hamas

64:42

broke that ceasefire and you said

64:44

yourself every country has a right to

64:46

defend themselves yeah Israel it seems

64:49

is the only country that can actually

64:51

execute and win a war we see what's

64:53

going on on the college protest I fully

64:55

agree with with you nobody can tell you

64:57

what's going on in aeran nobody can tell

64:59

you there's been a 10-year Civil War in

65:01

Yemen zero protest Syria Lebanon C Sudan

65:04

2 million people killed not a peep

65:08

Israel 30,000 people killed half of them

65:12

Hamas terrorists so what would you do to

65:14

create a ceasefire because Biden's

65:16

trying to play Both Sides to win

65:17

Michigan Trump he said himself it's not

65:20

politically helpful but I'll stand for

65:21

what's right what would you do yeah so I

65:23

would stand for Israel's right to defend

65:25

itself self and I would further block

65:28

any un micromanagement or EU

65:30

micromanagement of what Israel can and

65:32

cannot do to provide the level of

65:34

diplomatic backing what I would call a

65:36

diplomatic Iron Dome for Israel to be

65:40

able to defend its own sovereignty

65:42

Israel has a right to exist Israel has a

65:44

responsibility to exist as an ally we

65:46

defend their responsibility to exist

65:48

that's different than just starting

65:50

random preemptive bomb campaigns in Iran

65:53

or whatever but I'm not making this up

65:55

people have for this advocating for this

65:57

stuff right now Lind grah so I think

66:00

that to name one right but I think I

66:02

think that the way I look at it is you

66:04

got to be rational you got to be

66:05

cool-headed you got to actually stick to

66:08

First principles what's the first

66:09

principle we believe in here National

66:11

sovereignty and just as we wouldn't

66:13

appreciate it if Israel or any other

66:15

country were telling us that we couldn't

66:16

defend ourselves against a breach of our

66:20

own Southern border and we could debate

66:21

what's happening in this country right

66:22

now just as I wouldn't want another

66:24

country telling us we can't defend

66:25

against that well we shouldn't have

66:28

Israel be told by another country

66:29

including our own what they can and

66:31

can't do to defend their own National

66:32

boundaries as well and that's different

66:34

from saying oh then yeah the United

66:36

States should somehow get involved in

66:37

some preemptive strike on Iran which I

66:39

do think would be a drastic mistake and

66:41

so I see you know voices in both

66:43

directions that I think have lost their

66:45

ability to engage in cool-headed

66:47

rationality and I think one of the

66:49

things I would do is if you ask me if I

66:51

was in the position of President y

66:53

rational first principles their

66:55

sovereign they have a right to defend

66:56

themselves stick to it but not give them

66:58

money but not send them money well look

67:00

I don't think we should be intervening

67:01

in specific Wars that aren't directly

67:04

related to the United States but if you

67:06

think about in the Israel case one thing

67:07

to say here is their rate limiting step

67:11

is not money Israel's not running out of

67:14

money they're running out of diplomatic

67:17

air cover diplomatic support to do what

67:19

they need to do so it's sort of the

67:20

silly thing which oh they're short on

67:23

diplomatic support let's send over cash

67:26

versus what we're not doing enough of

67:28

which is actually diplomatically

67:29

standing for the principle that Israel

67:31

absolutely has a right to defend itself

67:33

go go to Ukraine similar sort of first

67:36

principle we have to recognize that

67:39

Ukraine yes had a border that was

67:40

breached by Russia at the same time the

67:42

United States has not kept its own

67:43

commitments from the early 1990s to

67:45

support the expansion of NATO so do a

67:47

deal that restores those first

67:48

principles NATO is not going to expand

67:50

to include Ukraine say that explicitly

67:53

rather than the opposite which is what

67:54

we're saying today which is that NATO

67:55

will definitely admit Ukraine at some

67:57

point in the future use that to pull

67:59

Russia apart from China get some extract

68:01

some concessions from Russia to be able

68:03

to say they're no longer to be able to

68:05

do joint military exercises with China

68:07

so I do think it's not to say foreign

68:09

policy is just like running a business

68:12

but just because you don't trust just

68:14

because you don't trust somebody doesn't

68:16

mean you can't trust them to follow

68:17

their own self-interest so understand

68:19

the self-interest of each of the actors

68:21

use that to our own advantage to advance

68:23

American interests and peace is in

68:26

America's interest and that's exactly

68:28

how I would and I appreciate you kind of

68:30

giving some detail to this because

68:32

Netanyahu isn't coming here hat in hand

68:34

asking for money he's literally saying

68:36

can we just do what we need to do to Def

68:38

defend ourselves to win this war

68:40

meanwhile zalinski is over here

68:42

literally fundraising and shaming

68:44

Congress if they don't pass hundred

68:47

billion dollar of Aid to Ukraine it's

68:49

totally different yeah I I I don't love

68:52

it when somebody is coming here shaming

68:53

us for not giving us the next 100

68:55

billion when they can't tell us what he

68:56

did with the first 100 billion I I do

68:58

have a problem with that Vinnie you look

68:59

like you want to say something well yeah

69:00

well I mean I think I agree 100% nobody

69:03

should you know tell them how to defend

69:05

themselves but I think the the fact that

69:07

people can't criticize you mentioned VC

69:09

which was one of my biggest things that

69:11

I was standing on was two weeks after

69:13

October 7th John Kirby stood in front of

69:15

America and and the reporters are like

69:17

can you tell what what happened and he

69:18

goes you know what there's going to be a

69:20

time now's not the time it's almost been

69:22

7 months still no answers Israel's doing

69:25

what they have to do some people are

69:26

saying it's a little bit over overboard

69:28

especially Adam you said half half the

69:30

people that were killed the 30,000 are

69:31

Hamas soldiers I haven't heard that

69:34

number I heard it was way less the

69:35

majority of the people that have been

69:37

killed are women and children I get it

69:39

they want to kill Hamas they want to get

69:41

after them but in regards to BB

69:43

Netanyahu he was supposed to be on trial

69:45

on October 7th for bribery fraud and

69:48

breach of trust how can we trust

69:50

somebody that's not giving us the

69:51

answers we're we're already all the way

69:52

over here we still don't know

69:54

fundamentally how could the most secure

69:57

place on the planet Adam's been to

69:59

Israel multiple times all I keep hearing

70:01

from people that have been to Israel is

70:03

Vinnie you everybody's walking around

70:05

with a gun the security is top-notch how

70:07

did this failure of intelligence happen

70:09

so bad for 6 hours these freaking

70:11

terrorists got to do whatever they did

70:12

and there's still no answers of how it

70:14

how it happened when the same when when

70:15

the same people are still in charge

70:17

right is another question to ask so I

70:18

think these are hard questions ask that

70:19

I would ask as an American in my own

70:21

country and you know what Israelis are

70:23

asking in Israel but the weird thing is

70:25

is you can't actually ask those

70:26

questions in the United States that's

70:28

what true friends actually do right true

70:30

friends treat their friends in the way

70:31

they would treat themselves and yet if

70:33

that happened here in the United States

70:35

I would absolutely be asking those

70:37

questions you saw I mean you put some of

70:38

those CS of me on the debate stage I

70:39

don't hold back in my criticisms of the

70:41

United States of America because our

70:43

country is stronger when we hold

70:44

ourselves accountable so I don't think

70:46

that we're doing our friends any favors

70:48

when somehow you play with your friends

70:49

with kid gloves either there was a major

70:51

breach of security failure there and I

70:53

think that the Israeli press is not in

70:55

netanyahu's water good I think the job

70:59

of a press in a nation is to hold its

71:01

own government accountable but it is a

71:03

weird dynamic that if the United St even

71:05

the United States you have actors that

71:07

do the same things particularly on the

71:08

American right even saying the same

71:10

things that even the pro-israel press in

71:12

Israel would be saying it's a weird

71:13

dynamic here that I find to be

71:15

condescending and I reject that I think

71:17

we should have honesty I've also

71:18

traveled a lot to Israel one of the

71:19

things I love about Israel is and I find

71:22

a lot of commonality with the people is

71:23

you have radically candid people right

71:25

even the business deals I've done cander

71:27

that's actually why a lot of them like

71:29

me and vice versa we had a great

71:30

relationship because we could be very

71:32

candid with each other and I think that

71:35

that's what I would bring to our

71:36

diplomacy as well is this radical cander

71:38

not this strategic ambiguity that

71:40

frankly not only Biden but even even

71:42

leaders from both parties pre- Trump and

71:45

the Republican Party would practice this

71:47

strategic ambiguity I believe in you

71:49

know what here's who we are here's what

71:50

we stand for here are the red lines we

71:52

draw them you mess it up you're going to

71:54

have consequences to pay and if not

71:55

we're gonna actually focus on our own

71:57

National the challeng the challenge is

71:59

it's almost like you can't question and

72:01

ask any questions right even if you look

72:04

at be ask question well if you look at

72:06

the um uh daily wire right with what

72:09

happened between them and uh Candace

72:11

Owens Candace Owens Ben Shapiro face of

72:14

the conservative party I think you can

72:16

probably put those two names with Tucker

72:20

those are three of the biggest faces of

72:22

the conservative party I don't know if I

72:24

put a name above them I think they're

72:25

top three digal top five all together

72:27

yeah I think they're in the top five all

72:29

together right and all of a sudden you

72:32

see daily wire they're going to be the

72:33

one that's going to compete with Fox

72:34

here's what daily wies doing that daily

72:35

wire is doing this daily wies doing that

72:37

and they're Gro and next thing you know

72:39

while you can't uh uh you know Candace

72:41

starts asking some questions she starts

72:43

calling out certain people she has the

72:45

schmoly guy and all these other people

72:46

hey what about this and what about that

72:48

and then next thing you know no we chose

72:50

to fire her because we're a publisher

72:52

we're not a platform so they chose to

72:54

take the position as a publish

72:56

and the rift was this specific topic how

73:00

closely are you following what happened

73:02

between Candace D wire Ben Shapiro and

73:06

when you look at that do you have any

73:07

thoughts where you say I think it should

73:08

have been this way or I know I don't

73:09

know enough about it what's your

73:11

position on that so peripherally yes I

73:13

what I've been following more closely is

73:14

the public sector response right so I

73:16

mean I'm not in the business of running

73:18

for the president of DA wire but I was

73:21

recently in the business of running for

73:22

president of the United States so I take

73:23

a look at what Congress is doing for

73:24

example parallel parallel topic but in a

73:27

domain that I think more people will be

73:29

familiar with than the inside base we're

73:30

on a podcast in the world of podcasting

73:32

you know that seems like a big deal

73:34

let's talk about what's happening in the

73:35

country is what happened to Israel wrong

73:37

on October 7th was that wrong absolutely

73:40

was does Israel have a right to defend

73:41

itself absolutely it does is a lot of

73:43

the anti-Semitism that we see in

73:44

response in the United States wrong yes

73:46

it is but it is beyond idiotic it is

73:50

dangerous that we see an act passing

73:53

Congress this is not like some sort of

73:55

theoretical bill that's been proposed

73:57

that would be bad enough we've seen that

73:59

one you got it up right there the

74:00

anti-Semitism awareness act that has now

74:05

passed been passed by the US House of

74:07

Representatives that literally says

74:09

there are certain opinions you cannot

74:12

express in the United States of America

74:14

you cannot I think different definitions

74:16

that have been adopted in this bill you

74:19

cannot compare the actions of Israel to

74:21

Hitler you cannot question the Dual

74:23

loyalty of Jews in the United States do

74:26

I agree with these claims of course not

74:27

I think it's ridiculous to compare

74:29

Israel's actions to those of Hitler I

74:30

think it's disgusting but the United

74:32

States of America is the quintessential

74:34

country where you get to express an

74:37

opinion and one of the things that I

74:39

think we've lost in this country in the

74:41

last 5 years is we've had so much mumbo

74:43

jumbo about all the exceptions to free

74:46

speech I mean if one more person tells

74:48

me oh you can't yell fire in a crowded

74:51

theater it's just like okay you TR

74:54

truism machine of course Al wend Holmes

74:56

said that yes you can't threaten to kill

74:58

somebody you can't sell you you know

75:01

this and claim to be medicine when in

75:03

fact it's snake oil that's commercial

75:05

fraud but here let me boil down the

75:07

First Amendment to one thing and it's

75:08

sad that I have to say this because

75:09

everyone's forgotten it but I'm going to

75:10

make the First Amendment 101 right here

75:13

okay the first amendment means one thing

75:15

in the United States it means

75:18

this you are free to express any opinion

75:24

period that doesn't mean you're AF free

75:25

to lie about what this contains telling

75:27

this is medicine when it's poison

75:29

doesn't mean that I'm free to threaten

75:30

to kill you that's not an opinion that's

75:32

an

75:32

action but you are free to express an

75:35

opinion no matter how heinous it is and

75:38

that law right up there on the screen

75:40

right now the anti-Semitism awareness

75:41

act that has passed the US House of

75:44

Representatives including with

75:45

Republican support is a disgusting

75:48

anti-American response to disgusting

75:51

opinions that are best defeated through

75:54

more speech not less and so that's the

75:57

kind of thing where if you see that in

75:58

our government can you can can you

76:00

expect that people in other institutions

76:01

are going to lose their minds too of

76:03

course do people start stop having the

76:06

ability to think straight when certain

76:08

questions come up I think that's human

76:09

nature there are certain questions for

76:11

certain people and they're different for

76:12

different people where there's certain

76:14

questions you lose your commitment to

76:15

your original principles but that's

76:17

where the rest of us who can see it with

76:18

Clarity deserve to remind them to say

76:20

hey here's our principle here's what our

76:22

first amendment says says no matter how

76:25

disgusting the speeches you get to

76:27

express the opinion that's different

76:29

from threatening violence that's

76:30

different from a lot of the stuff we're

76:31

seeing in the country that is not the

76:33

expression of free speech even on

76:34

campuses you don't have the freedom to

76:35

disrupt somebody else from going to

76:37

class no that's not the first amendment

76:39

but to say that you are what does this

76:42

say you know calling for aiding or

76:44

justifying the killing of harming of

76:46

Jews in the name of radical ideology or

76:47

an extremist stere view of religion

76:49

making a man accusing Jews of being

76:52

responsible for real or imagined wrong

76:54

doing well that'd be that'd be

76:56

disgusting but it's a it's it's a

76:57

disgusting opinion but it's an opinion

77:00

and all opinions under the First

77:02

Amendment are and with that bill be so

77:04

if you can't criticize a certain group a

77:06

certain country of certain people then

77:07

they can literally do whatever they want

77:10

and nobody could say anything if it gets

77:12

to that point then who are you to stop

77:14

me you're going to you're going to get

77:15

in trouble for for me saying wait a

77:17

minute Benjamin Netanyahu kind of weird

77:19

don't know this don't know that oh

77:20

you're you're you're anti-semitic now

77:21

here's the thing that's not really

77:22

what's happening yet in the country you

77:23

got got College protest

77:25

going to scho so so I I'm just calling

77:27

it like I see it across the board is say

77:30

a few things one is what happened to

77:33

Israel was wrong number two is most of

77:35

these campus protesters have no idea

77:36

what the hell they're protesting about

77:38

number three is I think it's disgusting

77:39

to disrupt somebody's ability to attend

77:41

class or Express their own opinions I

77:42

agree but the response to that by saying

77:45

that you can't express opinions or ask

77:46

certain questions or Express certain

77:48

opinions in response is also disgusting

77:51

and this is the stuff of how countries

77:52

end right both sides lose their

77:54

anchoring into their pris principles and

77:55

are willing to use Force to suppress the

77:57

other side that's the end of the United

77:59

States of America as we know it if we

78:01

get to the point where the left tries to

78:03

use Force Through bullhorns protests and

78:06

violence to silence those they disagree

78:08

with which we're seen some of in this

78:09

country that's a bad sign but what

78:12

really takes us down a dirty road is

78:13

when the right then tries to use the

78:15

police power and that's what this is the

78:17

police power of the federal government

78:19

to stifle them from expressing their

78:21

opinions that's not America and I think

78:23

we need the principle to stand for the

78:25

Republicans that are putting this out

78:26

there because I agree with you when this

78:27

thing came out what was it two weeks ago

78:29

that was sort of announced and it passed

78:30

I said actually I'm actually not a fan

78:32

of this because it's sort of dictating

78:35

what Free Speech should be nobody who

78:37

loves free speech in this country and

78:38

and and then they'll come up with all

78:39

these other examples we misinformation

78:41

and disinformation and liable no if you

78:43

ever if this ever comes up in a

78:45

discussion even people who are watching

78:46

this let me just give you the dinner

78:47

table sound bit because you're going to

78:48

hear a lot of the mumbo jumbo especially

78:50

during Co we heard about all the

78:52

exceptions to free speech I'm going to

78:53

boil it down

78:55

the Free Speech Clause of the First

78:56

Amendment means you get to express any

79:00

opinion you take one thing away from

79:01

this this time we've spent together let

79:03

it be that any opinion is fair game and

79:06

I think that's what this country was

79:07

founded so here's the only question that

79:08

I guess uh I agree that just like

79:11

capitalism is a Marketplace for goods

79:13

and services I believe that free speech

79:14

is a Marketplace for ideas and opinions

79:17

however wrong you might think they are

79:18

totally with you on the same page but

79:20

where does hate speech or calls for

79:23

genocide or

79:25

or The River To The Sea where do you

79:27

draw the line of Distinction of that we

79:29

remember in Congress the hearings when

79:30

Alise stefanic grilled the presidents of

79:33

your former Al Harvard I want to say of

79:36

uh calling for genocide well it depends

79:38

what kind of actions where does the

79:41

here's my ISS well here's my issue with

79:43

those University presidents right cuz

79:44

right now you're seeing people put

79:46

pressure to say well you've been

79:48

applying speech codes as it applies to

79:50

black students and gay students why

79:53

aren't you protecting Jewish students

79:54

the same way that's been the direction

79:56

of it I actually look at it the other

79:58

way why have you been having these

80:00

speech codes at all over the course of

80:02

The Last 5 Years the university should

80:04

prize free speech so the I think the

80:05

right criticism of those University

80:07

presidents should be and should have

80:09

been that you haven't really meant it

80:12

when you say you're an institution

80:13

committed to free speech there's nothing

80:15

at Harvard today Harvard was the worst

80:18

school for free speech can look at the

80:20

stat pretty bad

80:22

too I mean

80:26

it's all pretty bad right and so there

80:27

are certain views about the climate

80:29

about race about religion about gender

80:31

that you absolutely cannot express on a

80:33

Harvard or Yale here you go Harvard

80:35

right so that I think is the bigger

80:37

issue but I think that it would be a

80:39

mistake to say oh oh really because we

80:41

have been disrespecting free speech in

80:42

all of those other contexts let's also

80:44

prevent it in this other context too I I

80:46

think that's the wrong direction I think

80:47

the right direction to go is to say all

80:49

opinions are fair game to express them

80:52

disruptions or physical intim ation no

80:55

that's not expression of an opinion

80:57

that's out of bounds no matter which

80:58

side you're coming from we right we got

81:00

18 minutes and I want to go through a

81:01

couple different clips Rob can you pull

81:03

this uh pull up this clip Nancy Pelosi

81:06

Oxford uh she has an exchange and you

81:09

just this is like she got in trouble the

81:11

moment she decided to go here watch how

81:14

this thing gets go ahead and play

81:16

it before Co intelligence Services

81:19

colluded with big Tech to have Trump

81:21

suspended off Twitter yes the same

81:23

platform which hosted the Taliban and

81:27

Ayatollah de to Israel Ki they fought

81:30

the president crossed the line when he

81:32

tweeted on Jan 6 quote remain peaceful

81:36

no violence respect the law and our

81:39

great men and women in blue that's a

81:42

quote you may be thinking now that Trump

81:45

is a populist you are right he didn't

81:47

accept the 2020 elections and he should

81:50

have so should Hillary in 2016 so should

81:53

Brussels and so should Westminster in

81:55

2016 and so too should Congresswoman

81:59

Pelosi instead of saying the 2016

82:01

election was quote

82:03

hijacked quote hijacked it was it was

82:07

look boom look at that Peli in the room

82:10

yeah she's in the room get out of

82:11

couldn't have paid her to do better she

82:12

probably B with

82:15

her that we don't accept the results of

82:18

what what does that even mean what about

82:20

the mainstream media let me read you

82:22

some mainstream media headlines the New

82:24

Yorker the day before the 2016 election

82:27

the case against

82:31

democracy The Washington Post the day

82:33

after the election the problem with our

82:36

government is

82:38

democracy such joke the LA Times June

82:42

2017 the British election is a reminder

82:45

of The Perils of too

82:48

much

82:50

democracy Vox June 2017 the two eminent

82:53

political scientists say the problem

82:55

with democracy is

82:58

voters New York Times June 2017 I do the

83:02

problem with participatory democracy is

83:05

the

83:06

participants mainstream media Elites are

83:09

part of a class who don't just disdain

83:11

populism they disdain the people if the

83:14

Democrats had put half their energy into

83:17

delivering for the people Trump wouldn't

83:20

even have a chance in 2024 he shouldn't

83:22

he shouldn't have a chance you've power

83:24

for four

83:26

years from the fabricated steel dossier

83:29

to try to take him off the ballot in

83:31

both Maine and

83:33

Colorado the Democrats are the

83:36

anti-democrat party all we need now is

83:40

the Republicans to come out as the pro

83:45

monist ladies and gentlemen populism is

83:48

not a threat to democracy but I'll tell

83:50

you what is it's Elites ordering social

83:54

media to censor political

83:57

opponents it's police shutting down the

84:00

centers be it anti monists in this

84:03

country or gender critical voices here

84:06

or last week in Brussels the national

84:08

conservative uh

84:11

movement I'll tell you what is a threat

84:13

to democracy it's Brussels DC

84:15

Westminster the mainstream media big

84:17

Tech big farmer corporate collusion and

84:19

the Davos

84:22

cronies the threat to democracy comes

84:24

from those who write off Ordinary People

84:27

as deplorable the threat to democracy

84:30

comes from those who smear working

84:33

people as racists the threat to

84:36

democracy comes from those who write off

84:40

working people as populists and I'll say

84:43

one last

84:44

thing this populist age can be brought

84:47

to an end at the snap of a finger all

84:51

that needs to be done is for Elites to

84:53

start listening to respect it

84:57

respecting and God forbid working for

85:01

ordinary people thank you here here with

85:05

Pelos Pelosi you know she wanted to kill

85:07

him the whole time you know she was like

85:09

I hate do you what do you think about

85:11

this EV I like it I like 95% of it which

85:14

part do you not like well no I got to

85:16

start with the part I like first then

85:17

I'll get to the part I didn't like the

85:18

bow tie the the part I well it actually

85:20

relates to the bow tie funny it relates

85:23

to it okay but the the 95% that I love

85:26

first of all smart guy I think we need

85:28

more of that over here the threats to

85:31

democracy are really posed by the people

85:34

who profess the threats to democracy

85:36

which is orwellian right you accuse the

85:38

other side of the very thing of the very

85:40

sin that you're actively committing and

85:41

he did a great job with documentation

85:44

exactly pointing that out I mean

85:45

democracy is not just measured by the

85:47

number of ballots you cast every

85:48

November it's do you feel free to

85:50

express yourself are you using

85:52

technology companies or other tools to

85:53

suppress spee in a country so it's

85:55

beautifully said there's just one little

85:56

tweak I would I would suggest not only

85:58

to this gentleman but I mean there's a

85:59

lot of people in the US who borrow some

86:01

of this rhetoric is I don't love the use

86:05

of the word Elites right and and the

86:08

part that was just kind of hilarious is

86:10

to watch this man in like a bow tie like

86:12

a British

86:13

accent British Hall railing about like

86:16

the elites but but I think that I think

86:18

I'm not saying that to make fun of him I

86:19

think that we can actually do better

86:21

because it almost seeds the ground of

86:23

who is Elite to the Nancy Pelos there's

86:25

nothing Elite about Nancy Pelosi I mean

86:27

I mean there nothing Elite about Joe

86:28

Biden he doesn't have a functioning

86:30

brain I mean it might be a form of elder

86:31

abuse we could debate that but that's

86:33

not there's nothing Elite about that and

86:34

I think there are many kinds of Elites

86:36

there are the bureaucratic managerial

86:37

class there are the creators in the

86:39

country people like yourself people like

86:42

Elon Musk people like you know countless

86:44

other entrepreneurs in this country who

86:46

have created great things of Great Value

86:47

that are educated either self-educated

86:50

or at good universities or at no-name

86:51

universities every one of those can be a

86:53

member of an elite to so all I would say

86:55

is he was hitting the nail on the

86:58

head right until the very end when he

87:01

was close but he veered a little bit to

87:03

do this Elite versus working class thing

87:06

whereas I don't see that divide at all I

87:07

see the rise of people whether or not

87:09

they've been successful could be

87:11

described as Elite could be described as

87:12

working people everybody who says

87:14

there's base principles of what it means

87:16

to live in a free Democratic Society and

87:17

so 95% of it he was spotted Tom what do

87:19

you think when you see this

87:21

Nigel Nigel yes Nigel they I thought he

87:26

did a marvelous job he constructed his

87:28

argument and I was inspired by it and I

87:31

just look forward to the day where you

87:33

could see American students doing the

87:35

same thing over here rather than going

87:38

out into the quad and protesting because

87:40

he was constructing the argument based

87:42

on truth accuracy and facts I can agree

87:44

with you a little bit on using the word

87:45

Elites but to me that's small I still I

87:48

still give him a 98 on the paper you

87:50

know and I thought it was why do you

87:52

think how much of this you think is

87:53

happening and are you universities with

87:54

kids not why how is it not well I think

87:58

um we we need to introduce the study of

88:00

a foreign language in this country

88:02

called English people in this country

88:04

especially people have lost the ability

88:06

to use language to advance their own

88:08

ideas and language carves the channel

88:10

through which thought flows I do think

88:12

English should be the national language

88:13

of the United States I think that would

88:14

be a good thing actually to have a

88:15

grounding language and I do think that

88:17

part of what's happening right now is

88:19

people who talk like that in high school

88:21

I think things are changing right now

88:22

but if you rewind about 10 years ago at

88:23

least what happened was people who were

88:26

exceptionally talented academically and

88:28

ambitious academically were taught to

88:30

hide their Excellence right it wasn't

88:32

cool to be academically successful or

88:34

articulate or mathematically Advanced

88:37

and so we had this culture a little bit

88:39

of kids like him being the kinds of kids

88:42

who would be culturally labeled as

88:45

Gunners in class or whatever when I

88:46

think it's actually a great thing where

88:48

if you got somebody's going to throw

88:49

football you might as well get the guy

88:50

who's going to be able to throw the best

88:51

pass if you want a guy in an English

88:53

class you might as well want a guy who

88:54

in high school is going to be able to

88:55

speak the language as well as he is I

88:56

mean they're in college now and the same

88:58

thing for somebody who's good at math so

88:59

that culture of Excellence is part of

89:01

what we lost for a while do I think the

89:04

boomerang is coming back a little bit

89:06

well depends how you define it Elite

89:09

Nancy Pelosi I think is the first or

89:11

second richest member of Congress $250

89:15

million There's an actual website stocks

89:18

there's actual website that tracks her

89:19

net worth I think the only person that's

89:22

richer than her isi Scott who's the uh

89:25

Senator former governor of Florida but I

89:27

got to give Nancy Peli at least a little

89:29

credit what she's got more balls than

89:32

Biden she's shown up she knows when she

89:34

walks into Oxford Oxford she's going to

89:36

get lamb basted when either that or less

89:38

of an elder less less intelligent elder

89:40

care when she said when China said

89:42

what's going on when China said straight

89:44

up uh Nancy do not go to Taiwan she went

89:48

to Taiwan we gave her praise on this

89:51

podcast straight up Biden's not going to

89:54

Oxford B's not going to Taiwan she for

89:57

all her Nancy nervous craziness at least

90:00

has more balls to show up to uh hostile

90:03

territory someone like Biden handlers

90:05

well she's sitting there yeah I disagree

90:07

with that that was Paul Pelosi sitting

90:09

right next to her and if you take a look

90:10

in that he looked hammered they thought

90:12

it was a pub that's where they walked in

90:15

they thought it was a pub but let me

90:17

make a point which which which sort of

90:18

joking and denigration of of the other

90:21

side notwithstanding put that to one

90:23

side I think Republicans got to get

90:25

better at this actually I mean I I it's

90:27

easy to criticize the other side

90:28

self-criticism is a little bit harder to

90:30

engage in so let's do the

90:31

self-criticism as a party as a movement

90:34

I don't think we go to the other side

90:36

and actually engage in Earnest open

90:39

debate where we confront the opposition

90:41

I try to do as much of that as I could I

90:42

think you do a great job of that I think

90:44

Trump does it TR great Trump does it

90:46

well I tried to do the best I could

90:47

during the presidential campaign I went

90:49

to Great Lengths to do it I think it's

90:51

missing I really don't think we see of

90:54

that in our movement where are

90:55

Republicans going to college campuses

90:56

where are Republicans going to the inner

90:58

city I think it's an opportunity we have

91:00

this year though I think this is and

91:01

that's one of the things I'm trying to

91:02

do this year and we'll try to do not

91:04

only as I did during the campaign but

91:05

for the rest of the year show up where

91:08

you're not supposed to yep actually it's

91:10

easy to show up where you're supposed to

91:11

it's easy to preach to your own choir

91:13

but show up where you're not supposed to

91:15

and I think that's how you actually save

91:17

a country like VC when you showed up and

91:18

you started doing push-ups with those

91:21

college kids I mean what's really Last

91:23

Story last story last story last story

91:25

rob kep me in shape yeah Rob uh what I

91:27

love most is that that was cool and you

91:30

jumping allowing that jety guy to throw

91:32

you in you were learning how to do water

91:33

skin I was sick uh Rob can you pull up

91:36

the the U uh CNN Zakaria Biden should go

91:40

back to Trump's immigration policies

91:42

this has to be so hard for him to be

91:45

forced to say that but go ahead and play

91:47

this wonderful clip running towards law

91:50

enforcement because they have figured

91:52

out that all they have to do is say the

91:54

magic words I have a credible fear of

91:57

persecution and bingo you're in the

92:00

country legally you get two court

92:02

hearings they could take seven years

92:04

meanwhile you slip into the Shadows of

92:06

the economy so the whole system is

92:08

broken and Biden needs to confront that

92:11

and say you know we're going to have to

92:13

reform the whole system I would I would

92:15

wish he'd do something much more extreme

92:18

like say the old Asylum system is dead

92:20

no one is coming in through that process

92:22

you have to apply from your home Home

92:24

Country which was a trump policy which

92:26

was a you know a trump and also the

92:28

Mexico you know let you have to be in

92:30

Mexico toh to apply I think that's all

92:34

correct so strategically you think that

92:38

Biden would tack towards Trump policies

92:40

he would have actually better better

92:41

political chance and it's also the right

92:43

policy because the old Asylum system is

92:45

being gained by million a few big

92:48

thoughts look I think that once the

92:51

truth becomes so obvious it becomes is

92:53

undeniable so if you can't beat them

92:55

join them that's effectively what you're

92:56

seeing here and I think they've they've

92:59

tried to have their cake and eat it too

93:00

it's it's no accident that the very

93:02

people who are most opposed to the

93:05

border wall or to strong border policies

93:08

are also the ones who are most in favor

93:10

of completely open voter ID laws right

93:13

the lack of any voter ID laws so part of

93:15

what they've been doing is for 10 years

93:17

or more importing voters and opposing

93:20

Mass deportations they're they're

93:22

opposing the export of Voters I you're

93:23

not supposed to say it that way but

93:24

that's the truth import as many longrun

93:26

voters as you can minimize the exports

93:29

but now when that's coming back to bite

93:31

them even with just the mainstream

93:33

citizen population of the country now

93:35

they're at least using their verbiage to

93:37

say okay we imported all of those

93:38

potential longrun voters but now just

93:40

pretend like we actually intend to do

93:41

the opposite so that's what I see going

93:43

on a little bit and and it's actually an

93:45

interesting pattern Patrick because I

93:46

wanted to comment on this you know I

93:48

haven't actually haven't comment on this

93:49

elsewhere but it's sort of weight on me

93:51

is you see a lot of this stuff now who

93:54

was the comedian was it John Stewart you

93:55

know going on the rant about CO's origin

93:58

recently was that John Stewart coar oh

94:00

was coar okay no it's

94:03

St whatever but I think that I think

94:06

that you see that and you I see a lot of

94:08

people cheering and saying oh yeah he

94:10

did it yes how bold of him when it comes

94:14

to a lot of these admissions of failed

94:16

policies and reversals of conspiracy

94:19

theories the timing is everything right

94:22

if you already do it after the effect of

94:24

that policy has been born and everyone's

94:27

already seen it for how terrible it is

94:29

and the effect has already been negative

94:30

I don't think there's that much courage

94:32

in then coming around and saying what

94:35

you should have said three years ago and

94:37

so I think we got to be careful where a

94:38

lot of these folks in the center left

94:40

they're really trying to pack it in now

94:42

with their anti-woke commentary on the

94:45

Dei agenda on admitting bad covid

94:48

policies you could think about even some

94:50

of these immigration policy failure

94:51

admissions that are now coming and

94:53

you'll have a lot of people who

94:55

charitably say hey give him credit you

94:57

can maybe give him like an iota of

94:59

credit maybe but it's the easiest thing

95:02

to do in some ways it's even more

95:03

devious where after the damage has

95:05

already been done you Fain vulnerability

95:08

and pretend to admit it when in fact all

95:10

of the negative consequences have

95:12

already been had so timing is everything

95:14

on some of these things and we can't

95:15

lose sight of that better late than

95:16

never though right I I would say I would

95:18

say better late than never if it's

95:20

Earnest and in ver zakaria's case it

95:22

looked like it was Earnest right I think

95:24

there's a cynical version of it where

95:26

you actually would rather have it late

95:29

and pretend like there was some kind of

95:30

admission but there's no consequence to

95:32

you and you're just using it to build a

95:33

fake credibility so better late than

95:36

never yes as long as it's sincere and if

95:38

it's sincere fine I'll give you points

95:40

for that not a lot of points but I'll

95:41

give you some I love it okay beake great

95:45

to have you on every time we're here we

95:46

enjoy the conversations um so this week

95:49

you said you're going to be at the trial

95:51

with him tomorrow with the president

95:53

yeah I'm flying for from here I started

95:54

my morning in Ohio I'm here now I'll be

95:55

in uh New York by tonight fantastic how

95:58

much sleep you get every night it's not

96:00

one of my bigger

96:02

Hobbies that's why your number one draft

96:04

pick 2028 in my opinion by the way go

96:07

follow the man's podcast truth thean

96:10

Coulter podcast that he did is live on

96:12

here go check it out Rob make sure we

96:13

put the link below in the chat and the

96:15

comment section gang take care I think

96:17

we're doing a podcast home team tomorrow

96:19

lots of stories we didn't cover and I'm

96:21

about to announce the next live who it's

96:24

going to be it's going to be explosive

96:27

and nobody here knows because I just

96:29

locked it up during this podcast while

96:31

I'm texting these guys they agreed it's

96:34

going to be insane I'll announce it

96:35

tomorrow tickets will sell out within

96:37

the second I announce it take care

96:38

everybody we'll see you guys tomorrow

96:40

God bless bye bye bye bye thank you