EP-097 丁学良:中美交流的历史性赤字 | 丁学良 | 中国经济 | 中美关系 | 布林肯 | 留学生 | 川普 | 贸易战 | 特朗普 |
Summary
TLDR本期播客由袁莉主持,邀请了政治社会学家丁学良教授,共同探讨了中美关系的历史与现状。丁教授分享了他在美国学习、工作的经历,并对中美关系的未来进行了深刻洞察。讨论涉及了中美经济、贸易、学术和文化交流的起伏,以及近年来的交流逆差现象。提及了美中贸易战、互联网审查、以及双方民间的负面印象等问题,并对未来中美关系的最佳与最差可能性进行了展望。
Takeaways
- 🇨🇳 中美关系的历史回顾:毛泽东在1949年发表了著名评论《别了,司徒雷登》,标志着中美关系的转折点。
- 🤝 尼克松1972年访华:这一事件标志着两国关系开始缓和。
- 📉 近年来中美交流减少:包括留学生数量下降,经贸关系冷却,以及中国在美形象的负面看法增加。
- 👨🎓 学术交流重要性:丁学良教授强调了学术交流在中美关系中的重要性,尤其是在社会科学领域。
- 🎓 留学生的生活条件:丁学良教授提到,中国政府资助的留学生在美国生活条件不佳,可能影响他们对美国的看法。
- 📚 教育交流的建议:丁学良教授提出了改善中美教育交流的具体建议,如提供奖学金给学习社会科学的中国学生。
- 🔍 公众舆论的影响:中美两国民众对彼此国家的负面看法增加,这对两国关系产生了影响。
- 🎬 文化产品的影响:中国近年来成功的电影多与韩战(即朝鲜战争)有关,反映了中美之间的战争历史。
- 🌐 互联网与信息获取:中美之间的互联网限制和信息获取差异,对两国人民的相互理解和关系产生了影响。
- 💼 经济与贸易关系:中美经济和贸易关系的冷却,以及供应链的转移,对中国的经济繁荣构成了挑战。
- 🏛️ 政策与法规的影响:中美之间的政策和法规差异,如签证问题和学术交流的限制,对两国人民的互动产生了障碍。
Q & A
毛泽东在1949年发表了哪篇著名评论,它对中美关系有何影响?
-毛泽东在1949年发表了著名评论《别了,司徒雷登》,这标志着中美关系的历史上的一个转折点,中美关系从此进入了一段冷淡期。
尼克松1972年访华对中美关系有何重要意义?
-尼克松1972年的访华是中美关系开始解冻的重要事件,标志着两国关系从长期的对立走向接触和交流。
近年来中美之间的哪些交流出现了历史性的下降?
-近年来,中美之间的教育交流出现了历史性的下降,例如美国来华的国际学生数量急剧减少,2022年仅有350人,到2023年底回升至700人。同时,中国在美留学生的数量也开始减少。
2023年,哪个国家取代了中国成为美国最大的进口来源国?
-2023年,墨西哥取代了中国成为美国最大的进口来源国。
根据皮尤研究中心2023年5月1日发布的数据,美国人对中国的看法是怎样的?
-根据皮尤研究中心的数据,美国人对中国的负面看法达到了历史最高点,超过了70%的受访者对中国持负面看法。
Outlines
📜 中美关系的历史回顾与当前形势
本段落主要回顾了中美关系的历史演变,从1949年毛泽东发表《别了,司徒雷登》标志着中美关系的冰点,到尼克松1972年访华开始关系缓和。50年来,尽管有起伏,但两国在经济、贸易、学术和文化交流方面并未中断。然而近年来,中美交流再次出现历史性赤字,表现在留学人数下降、贸易关系冷却,以及美国对中国的负面看法增加。同时,中国在电影票房成功的多是关于朝鲜战争的影片,反映出中美关系的复杂性。
👨🏫 丁学良教授的学术背景与中美交流见解
丁学良教授作为嘉宾,分享了他在中美关系交流方面的观察和洞见。他是香港科技大学的荣休教授,1984年赴美深造,1992年获得哈佛大学博士学位,并曾在美国智库工作。他的研究领域包括比较现代化、全球化、国际竞争等。丁教授回忆了1988年在哈佛大学时获得的一件纪念T恤,以及他在美国学习和研究的40年历程,包括与美国国务院的交流经历,展现了当时中美交流的活跃程度。
🤝 改善中美关系的建议与思考
丁学良教授提出了改善中美关系的具体建议,包括重视中国政府资助的社会科学研究,以及改善中国政府资助的留学生在美国的生活条件,以留下积极印象。他还强调了让留学生体验美国文化和价值观的重要性,以及通过这些交流促进两国之间的理解和友好关系。
📉 中美交流的衰退及其原因
本段落讨论了中美交流合作近年来的明显下降趋势,以及其背后的可能原因。提到了2008年北京奥运会前后中美关系的高峰,以及之后关系的逐渐下滑。特别是2018年中美贸易战爆发后,关系急剧恶化。同时指出,美国对中国的不满和抱怨在特朗普时期爆发,而中国对美国的抱怨也存在多年。
🌐 互联网与中美关系的未来展望
讨论了互联网在中美关系中的作用,以及所谓的“脱钩”现象,这不仅涉及经济、贸易和技术,还包括互联网上的交流。这种脱钩使得外国学生和学者难以适应中国的环境,因为与外界的联系变得几乎不可能。同时,中国决策者希望加强双方交流,邀请更多美国青年来华交流学习,但实际数字远低于预期,反映了美国学生对中国的不乐观态度。
🔍 中美关系的未来:挑战与可能性
本段落探讨了中美关系未来可能的最佳和最坏情况,以及这些情况对两国关系和各自国家的影响。提到了布林肯提出的改善中美交流的建议,包括创造条件促进学术交流、自由开放地讨论观点、获取广泛信息和便利旅行。同时指出,这些改变需要中国中央政府的重要决策,而目前尚未看到明显的迹象。
🏛 中美文化交流的长期影响
讨论了中美文化交流对双方长期关系的潜在影响,特别是年轻一代的观点和印象如何对未来关系产生影响。提到了美国对中国的负面印象可能对中国自身的影响,以及中国互联网上对美国的负面看法。强调了改善这种状况的重要性,以及文化交流在建立积极关系中的作用。
💼 经济关系与中美脱钩现象
本段落关注了中美经济关系的变化,特别是发达国家加速与中国经济脱钩的趋势。提到了外国直接投资的减少,以及这对中国沿海和大中城市的影响。强调了中国与美国和西方国家的经济交流对中国过去几十年经济繁荣的重要性,并对未来的潜在影响表示担忧。
🏙️ 中美关系恶化对普通人的影响
讨论了中美关系恶化对普通中国人的影响,特别是对中产阶级和低收入家庭的影响。提到了留学和海外投资的困难,以及人们对未来不确定性的担忧。强调了全球化带来的机遇减少,以及这对中国社会各阶层的潜在影响。
📚 推荐阅读:增进中美文化理解
本段落中,嘉宾推荐了几本关于中美关系的书籍,包括《美国和中国》、《李慎之与美国研究所》和《毛泽东的最后革命》,旨在帮助读者更深入地了解中美两国之间的历史交流、文化差异和相互影响。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡中美关系
💡文化交流
💡经济交流
💡公共舆论
Highlights
毛泽东在1949年发表了著名评论《别了,司徒雷登》,标志着中美关系的历史性转折。
尼克松1972年访华,两国关系开始解冻。
中美关系过去50年经历了起伏,但经济、贸易、学术和文化交流并未中断。
近年来中美交流再次出现历史性赤字,美国赴华留学生数量急剧下降。
2023年墨西哥取代中国成为美国最大进口来源国。
Transcripts
Hello everyone, welcome to the Bumingbai Podcast. I am the host Yuan Li.
In August 1949, on the eve of the founding of the Communist Party of China,
Mao Zedong published the famous commentary "Farewell, Leighton Stuart",
marking a historic deficit in Sino-US relations.
Since then, the relationship between the two countries has It was
not until Nixon's visit to China in 1972 that the relationship between the two countries began to thaw.
Over the past 50 years, Sino-US relations have had ups and downs
, but the economic, trade, academic and cultural exchanges between the two countries have not been interrupted.
However, in recent years, Sino-US exchanges have once again experienced a historic surge. Deficit:
The number of international students from the United States to China dropped
sharply . In 2022, there were only 350. They rebounded to 700 by the end of 2023.
The number of Chinese studying in the United States also began to decrease.
The economic and trade relations between the two countries also cooled significantly.
In 2023, Mexico replaced China as the largest source of imports for the United States. Foreign
data released by the Pew Research Center on May 1 showed that
81% of Americans hold a negative view of China
, of which 43% held a very negative view of China.
In 2006, only 29% of Americans held a negative view of China. Negative views
China does not have reliable data in this regard
, but several of China’s most successful movies at the box office in recent years
are about the Korean War,
that is, movies about the war between China and the United States.
Why will the exchanges between China and the United States once again enter a historic deficit
in the future ? Will it continue to get worse?
What impact will this deficit have on the relations between the two countries and the two countries themselves?
In this issue, we invited political sociologist Ding Xueliang
to share his observations and insights.
Ding Xueliang is an emeritus professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
. In 1984, he went to study in the United States and
received his doctorate from Harvard University in 1992.
He once worked in an American think tank.
His main research areas include comparative modernization
, globalization, international competition
, public governance, the political economy of transformed societies, etc.
His major works include
"For and Against the Chinese Model" and China’s economy will rise again.
Hello, Mr. Ding. Hello
, hello. Hello. Hello. Hello
. Your dress looks very good today.
It’s very suitable for the camera.
This dress is very memorable. I was
rummaging through boxes and cabinets to find this one
for this show.
This piece of clothing was from the summer of 1988
when I was a PhD student at Harvard University.
In order to commemorate the tenth anniversary of China's reform and opening up
, the MIT student union
invited me to give a report
through the Harvard student union.
After the report was completed,
I was given this T-shirt. When I
gave the report at that time,
the enthusiasm of the audience's enthusiasm
for the development of Chinese students,
that kind of emotion that burst out immediately,
is like recalling a century ago.
This year is my 40th year
to study in the United States.
There are not many 40-year
anniversaries in life
, right,
because I remember very clearly
that it was August 29, 1984, when I left Beijing.
It was the first time in my life that I took a plane
and left China for the United States
. And I remember
August 30, which was very impressive.
After I arrived in the United States,
I received three very important invitations within
a week. I remember
how dynamic
the exchanges between the United States and China were at that time. One invitation was that Harvard University invited me to attend a seminar,
and we were
the organizers
. Everyone knows that MacFarquhar, the
world's number one authority on the Chinese Cultural Revolution, whose Chinese name is Ma Ruode, is one of my mentors
who has passed away.
He invited me to attend a seminar at Harvard.
The second invitation
came from Princeton. The person who invited me to the International Studies Center of the university
is still alive
because he is about the same age as me.
He studies the relationship between three major countries.
One is China,
the other is Soviet Russia, such as the Soviet Union, Russia
, and Japan.
He is fluent in three languages
. The language genius
asked me to attend a very important seminar at
the Princeton International Center.
So what about the third invitation?
Now that I think about it, it’s basically
like a dream.
I received an invitation from the U.S. State Department.
There is a very senior researcher in the U.S. State Department.
He represents the U.S. State Department.
It is this Debut Secretary who
invited me to Washington to have a discussion
with him. I am the Deputy Secretary of State
who came to study.
I was surprised
when I received this invitation.
He asked What are you doing?
Oh, I was very nervous at the time.
My spoken English is so broken now.
Then I went to the U.S. State Department
to talk to such a high-ranking official.
I am not a diplomat , and I received
some so-called revolutionary education in China
before I went abroad.
After going to the United States, you have to pay attention
to being influenced by the United States.
When you go abroad, you have to pay attention to spies and so on.
There is a lot of revolutionary education.
So when I went to Washington,
I was very surprised.
I brought my passport and
my student ID.
I brought all the papers with me
because I thought the State Council would be fine.
Then when I arrived at the gate of the State Council,
I was surprised that
no one checked my documents
and then asked me if I had an appointment.
I said yes. What time, what time?
I think who called me
, and then he took a piece of paper and
looked at it.
He said yes. He said you go in. He
didn’t even look at the ID and let me go to the U.S. State Department
to talk about the issue at that time. The United States is very concerned about
you, the best-educated people in China
, and you have also experienced China’s Cultural Revolution
and many movements before the Cultural Revolution
, including earth-shaking things,
because of their background to me. ) I have checked
and I know
what my situation was like when I was a child. I came from a rural area.
His question
focuses on the exchanges between the United States and China.
In addition to high-level diplomacy,
the knowledge of a young man like you From the molecular point of view,
what else can the United States do more
and get a positive response from China?
I made a lot of specific suggestions at that time,
including two suggestions.
I was studying in the United States at the time. It didn’t last long.
I just listened.
What is one thing
that resonates with me the most ? First, when you provide scholarships
to students from China,
you must pay attention to
the Chinese government-funded projects of the Ministry of Education.
They give priority to students majoring in science and engineering,
but China The government
basically doesn’t give priority
to students from the United States studying social sciences.
So if the United States wants to fund Chinese students,
it must fund social sciences.
I was talking about China’s science and technology at that time
. In fact, there is a huge gap between
China’s science and technology
and that of the United States.
The gap in China’s social sciences is even greater. If
there is no funding from the United States in this field , then the opportunity
to study social sciences and get a doctorate in the United States
is very slim in China.
This is the first important thing I mentioned.
The second important thing is what is it
now? For international students from mainland China who come to the United States,
if they are sponsored by the Chinese government,
I have heard a lot of these very negative remarks
because China was relatively poor at that time. They
paid more than 300 US dollars per month
and deducted part of the money for medical insurance.
Under this situation,
Chinese government-sponsored international students
can only live in the poorest and worst places. If these students
stayed in such an environment after
spending several years in the United States,
even if they were not affected by crime or violence,
their impression of the United States would be a mess.
Then the State Department officials would understand very well after hearing this.
He said that some of our cities in the United States
are so-called inner cities,
which are the central parts of old cities.
He said that many of our middle class have left and
are like shabby areas.
We know these situations.
But you can't let Chinese students come to the United States
with such an impression and then return to China. Their
impression of the United States will be a mess.
You can organize some groups in the summer
and don't spend too much money to get a bus.
Just take them. Go to monumental places in America
and let them see that
there are some really amazing things in America. Let them see
and let them remember.
Let them leave those impressions of America that are very worthwhile.
Except the places where they did a terrible job
are also part of America
. But that It’s not all about the United States.
At that time, I felt that I also made some realistic remarks about
the exchanges between the United States and China.
What you said really made
me sigh with emotion.
The relationship between China and the United States is very, very different
now than in the 1980s.
Hello everyone, I am Yuan Li
There are dozens of hours of careful preparation and production
behind the wonderful conversation you just heard.
This requires reading a lot of data
and taking time to communicate with the interviewees.
Only in this way can you ask good questions
and have in-depth conversations.
Bumingbai podcast will continue to be committed to
producing high-quality news content
so that Chinese people can hear profound thoughts and real emotions.
In this era of darkness and uncertainty,
we can hear a little persistence in each other’s hearts.
Please continue to support the I Don’t Understand podcast
and let us continue this business for a long time.
Listeners are welcome
to click on the donation link in our content introduction for this issue
or visit the donation page of our website
Bumingbai.net.
I would like to ask a question.
I also said in this introduction that from the data,
the exchanges and cooperation between China and the United States
are in There has been a very obvious decline in recent years.
When do you think this situation started
and what caused it?
Because before this, it had a peak.
Before this peak, there was also a twists and turns.
Just like you said, there are still ups and downs,
but The general trend is upward. When will it
reach its peak?
In my observation, it probably reached
its peak in 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Of course, those of us who study China and observe China know that
this is the most important reason
. The peak at that time was because of the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
In the years before the Olympics,
Chinese officials used all channels
, including the channels of overseas Chinese
, including the so-called old friends of the Chinese,
to expand the doors or windows of China's opening to the outside world.
Whether it’s a trail,
a front door, or a back door,
this thing left a very deep impression on me
because from 2005 to 2008,
as you know, I was
appointed by the Carnegie Foundation of the United States
to work on the project as a representative of Beijing.
It is the challenge of globalization to US-China relations.
Where is my project? You are very familiar with
it. The Friendship Hotel
receives various people from the West almost every day,
including academics, media,
diplomats, and business people. Of course
, it occasionally receives some exchange students,
so
I think it was the peak during that period.
After the peak in 2009 and 10,
there was a slow decline
, but not a sharp decline.
The real sharp decline was in the following years
. In the following years,
of course, we have to
put aside the epidemic of more than three years, because there is nothing we can do about it.
Because of the epidemic for more than three years,
people like us have lost
the right to move freely, not to mention foreigners.
Putting aside the fact that
it had been declining significantly for more than three years
before the epidemic , one of our hopes
was that after the strict epidemic prevention was lifted,
just like China's economy, many people were hoping
for a rebound and recovery.
So now it obviously looks like
China's economy has not risen as sharply as people expected
after the epidemic prevention and control was lifted,
and the exchanges between the United States and China
have not shown this momentum.
This is a very regretful thing.
You said you want to ask from When did it start
? According to my observation , it has been declining continuously
since 2010.
And this continuous decline soon
reached an extremely serious critical point
, that is, in 2018,
the trade war between the United States and China broke out
. It suddenly dropped sharply. Before this, China
already had many policies
, but the United States came out with these policies under Trump. The treatment
was dramatic, and communication
suddenly entered winter.
This is a result of the joint efforts of the decision-makers of both sides,
isn't it? Because before Trump started the trade war,
the United States had a lot of complaints about China.
We all know this
, but most of those complaints came from
the education and academic circles, and a small number came from
the media. Of course, the media complained the most,
but At that time, U.S. government officials also complained
, but their complaints at that time
were based on the expectation
that their complaints would elicit a positive response from Chinese officials,
and then the complaints from China would be eliminated.
Those measures, practices
, or rules and regulations that
are not conducive to exchanges between the two sides
. After Trump started the trade war in 2018, the dissatisfaction, resentment , and complaints
from the United States that had been accumulated for many years
exploded out. What
impressed me very deeply was that when the two sides were quarreling
, for example, Chinese diplomats in the United States,
whether in Washington or in several other cities,
had to leave their offices in the city center
within a few miles, which was OK (ok)
but beyond. If you go beyond those miles, you must report it first,
and then China will be very angry. Officials
think that this is very detrimental to the activities of Chinese diplomats in the United States.
Then American officials will say
that China has been doing this to us for decades.
In fact, The U.S. has
begun to treat these things as equals, right, and
demands reciprocity. But in the past,
when the U.S. was too embarrassed to say this, Trump
slowly started to say all the things he had said before.
Then this relationship will no longer work
, and what I said before about the United States
, because what we are talking about today is that we are the United States and China
. In fact, it is not only the United States,
but also Europe, including the Asia-Pacific region, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea.
They also have similar complaints.
China probably started from In 2015,
maybe this website started in 2014.
Basically, the outside world saw
what we talk about decoupling. Decoupling refers to
the decoupling of economy, trade and technology
. But on the Internet, this decoupling
is far ahead of the post-economic, trade and technology.
This also makes it
very, very difficult
for students, scholars, etc.
from the United States, Europe,
or the outside world in the Asia-Pacific region to get used to it after arriving in mainland China,
because it has nothing to do with outside friends or relatives. connect
It becomes basically impossible
, so these complaints
have erupted like a volcano
in 2018.
Chinese decision-makers expressed their hope to strengthen exchanges between the two sides
and expressed their willingness to invite 50,000
American teenagers in the next five years.
Go to China for exchange and study . However, there will still be only 700
American students in China in 2023.
In 2018, this number was still more than 11,000.
Do you think this is why there has been a sudden drop in the number of American students willing to come to China?
We all know that in In the United States,
you ask those American youths, whether they are Asian or non-Asian,
no matter which ethnic group they are,
to make them spend so much energy and time to come to China.
Even if they receive part of the funding
, they still have to have additional funds. In addition to the cost of his own
time, why did he come to China
? Either he is very positive about you emotionally, likes you here
, or is even fascinated.
There is another reason that is more important than this reason,
which is his own studies
and employment after studies. Is it an important investment
? If China's economy becomes better and better
and more open to the outside world
, then the economic, technological, and cultural channels between the United States and
China will become wider and wider in the future . Then these young people will come to China.
I don’t think people who come here to study and exchange are
the kind of tourists who
come for a week or two and then leave. I think they come to China for at least a semester
or even an academic year or even two or three years.
Why do they invest so much?
Either there is hope in the future, that is,
because he has made such an investment in China
, he will be rewarded for the growth of his young people.
But since 2016,
what I have met is the United States, Canada, Australia, and
Europe. Young people
, I say, young people from the age group of 20 to 35
are increasingly less optimistic about the return on their investment in China. This
is because American students and young people want to come to China
unless their family’s economic situation is very good
and these young people The person himself is also willing to invest his financial resources
in exchanges in China.
Otherwise, he will have to obtain a lot of funding from outside the family.
We all know that in the United States, there are many foundations in the United States and
exchange scholarships in good universities in the United States. Scholarship)
This fellowship is this scholarship,
what is it, Program (project), there are many
, but the United States does not only deal with China,
it deals with so many countries,
why is it able to sponsor (fund)
if it is not related to it? Provide funds to support these young people
, and it is not just a small number,