See what Trump says he may have to do to pay bond

CNN
19 Mar 202409:58

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses the legal and financial troubles of former President Donald Trump, who is accused of inflating asset values and now faces the possibility of having to sell off properties to cover a substantial bond. The conversation includes insights from investigative journalist David Cay Johnston and touches on Trump's portrayal as a billionaire, his 2016 campaign claims, and the potential impact on his public image. The dialogue also addresses Trump's divisive rhetoric, including his comments about Jewish Democrats and the potential consequences of his extreme language.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ“ฐ The transcript discusses legal and financial troubles faced by former President Donald Trump, including baseless accusations and conspiracy to overturn an election.
  • ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Investigative journalist and law professor David Cay Johnston shares insights on Trump's financial situation and the potential need to sell off assets.
  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Trump's properties are valuable but have underlying mortgages, complicating his ability to secure additional financing.
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ There are allegations of Trump inflating the value of his assets, in some cases claiming they are worth 163 times what the market shows.
  • ๐Ÿค” Questions are raised about Trump's claimed wealth, as he has long portrayed himself as a billionaire, yet now faces liquidity issues.
  • ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Trump's public statements and social media posts suggest he may need to sell assets, which contradicts his previous portrayal of financial success.
  • โš–๏ธ Legal proceedings and appeals are ongoing, with Trump having filed an appeal but needing to post a bond or come up with cash in the meantime.
  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ There is a possibility of a forced sale of Trump's properties by the state if he fails to meet financial obligations, which could result in a fire sale.
  • ๐Ÿ’ฅ Trump's divisive language, including recent comments about Jewish Democrats, is highlighted as a concern for its potential impact on the country.
  • ๐Ÿšจ The transcript raises concerns about Trump's rhetoric escalating to a point where it could incite dangerous actions, as seen in previous events like the January 6th insurrection.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?

    -The main issue discussed is the legal and financial troubles faced by Donald Trump, including allegations of conspiracy to overturn an election and the need to sell off assets to deal with financial obligations.

  • Who is David Cay Johnston in the context of the transcript?

    -David Cay Johnston is an investigative journalist and law professor at Syracuse University, who is being interviewed to provide insights into Trump's financial situation.

  • What is the significance of the bond mentioned in the transcript?

    -The bond refers to a financial requirement imposed on Trump, which he claims is unconstitutional and unachievable for any company, including his own. It is significant because it highlights his current financial challenges.

  • Why is Trump's portrayal of himself as a billionaire a point of contention?

    -Trump's portrayal as a billionaire is contentious because it has been contradicted by public records and financial disclosures, raising questions about the authenticity of his wealth and the value of his assets.

  • What is the implication of the term 'fire sale' in the context of Trump's assets?

    -A 'fire sale' implies a forced and rapid sale of assets, often at significantly reduced prices. In Trump's case, it suggests that if the state forces the sale of his properties, it could lead to substantial financial losses.

  • How does Trump's team respond to the claim that he needs to sell off assets?

    -Trump's team argues that no billionaire is that liquid and blames underwriters for setting an unrealistically high bond amount, suggesting that they are not willing to go anything over 100 million.

  • What is the significance of Trump's statement about Jewish Democrats?

    -Trump's statement is significant as it is seen as divisive and potentially anti-Semitic, further highlighting his controversial communication style and its impact on different communities.

  • What is the concern regarding Trump's use of extreme language and predictions?

    -The concern is that Trump's use of extreme language, such as 'bloodbath' and 'bedlam', could incite violence or unrest, especially considering his influence over his followers and the events of January 6th.

  • How does the transcript suggest Trump's view on the presidency?

    -The transcript suggests that Trump views the presidency as his only way out of his current legal and financial troubles, indicating a desperate situation and a potential motivation for his political actions.

  • What is the role of the monitor mentioned in the transcript?

    -The role of the monitor, in this context, is to ensure that the sale of Trump's properties, if it occurs, is conducted in a way that maximizes the highest value, protecting the interests of all parties involved.

  • What is the potential impact of Trump's financial and legal issues on his political career?

    -The potential impact could be significant, as it challenges his image as a successful businessman and could affect his credibility and support among voters, particularly those who were drawn to his portrayal of wealth and success.

Outlines

00:00

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Legal Troubles and Financial Woes

This paragraph discusses the legal and financial challenges faced by Donald Trump. It highlights his baseless accusations and conspiracy to overturn a free and fair election. The conversation involves law professor David Cay Johnston, who shares insights into Trump's financial situation, suggesting that Trump may need to sell off assets due to underlying mortgages and inflated asset values. The discussion also touches on Trump's public image as a billionaire and the discrepancy between his claims of wealth and the reality of his financial situation.

05:02

๐Ÿ’ฌ Trump's Brand and Divisive Rhetoric

This paragraph focuses on the impact of Trump's financial troubles on his personal and political brand, which has long been associated with wealth and success. It also addresses his divisive rhetoric, particularly his comments about Jewish Democrats and the potential dangers to the country if he does not win the presidency. The conversation includes reactions from former Republican and Joe Walsh, as well as founder of Democracy Docket, Marc Elias, who express concern over Trump's language and the potential consequences of his words.

Mindmap

Keywords

๐Ÿ’กConspiracy

In the context of the video, 'conspiracy' refers to a secret plan or agreement to commit an illegal or harmful act. It is central to the theme as it is mentioned in relation to the charges against former President Biden, who is accused of conspiring to overturn a fair election. This term is used to highlight the severity of the allegations and the potential legal consequences.

๐Ÿ’กElection Preference

This term refers to the alleged illegal actions taken to influence the outcome of an election. In the video, it is linked to the accusations against the individual, suggesting that there were attempts to manipulate the election results in their favor. This concept is crucial to understanding the legal and ethical issues being discussed.

๐Ÿ’กFinancial Situation

The 'financial situation' refers to the economic status or condition of an individual or entity, including their assets, liabilities, and overall financial health. In the video, it is discussed in relation to Donald Trump's assets and the potential need to sell them to deal with his financial obligations. This concept is central to understanding the personal and business implications of the legal issues at hand.

๐Ÿ’กInflating Assets

Inflated assets refer to the practice of overvaluing one's property or possessions, often for financial gain or to deceive others about one's wealth. In the video, this concept is linked to Trump's alleged actions of inflating the value of his assets, which is a significant issue in the legal case against him. This term is important for understanding the nature of the financial misconduct being alleged.

๐Ÿ’กBillionaire

A billionaire is an individual with a net worth of at least one billion dollars. The term is used in the video to highlight the public persona of wealth and success that Trump has cultivated over the years. The concept is relevant as it contrasts with the financial difficulties he is currently facing, which raises questions about the accuracy of his self-presented wealth.

๐Ÿ’กFire Sale

A fire sale refers to a rapid sale of assets, often at significantly reduced prices, due to urgent financial needs. In the context of the video, it is mentioned as a potential outcome if Trump is forced to sell his properties to raise funds. This term is crucial for understanding the dire financial straits that Trump may be in and the possible consequences of his legal troubles.

๐Ÿ’กUnderwriters

Underwriters are professionals in the insurance and financial industries who assess risk and determine the terms and conditions of insurance policies or financial instruments. In the video, underwriters are mentioned in the context of the bond that Trump is required to post, indicating their role in evaluating his financial risk and the feasibility of the bond's conditions.

๐Ÿ’กAppeal

An appeal is a legal process where a party requests a higher court to review and possibly overturn a lower court's decision. In the video, Trump's intention to appeal the court's decision is mentioned, which is a standard legal recourse when a party believes the initial ruling was unjust or incorrect. This concept is important for understanding the ongoing legal process and Trump's options to contest the ruling against him.

๐Ÿ’กDivisive Rhetoric

Divisive rhetoric refers to language or speech that incites disagreement, discord, or hostility among different groups of people. In the video, this term is used to describe Trump's comments about Jewish Democrats, which are seen as creating division along religious and political lines. This concept is significant as it reflects on the impact of Trump's statements on social cohesion and the political climate.

๐Ÿ’กAccountability

Accountability refers to the expectation that individuals, especially those in positions of power, must accept responsibility for their actions and face the consequences if they engage in illegal or unethical behavior. In the video, the concept of accountability is central to the discussion of Trump's legal challenges and the broader theme of holding public figures to a standard of conduct.

๐Ÿ’กInsurrection

Insurrection refers to a violent uprising against an authority or government. In the context of the video, the term is used to describe the January 6th Capitol riots, which were incited by Trump's calls for action against the certification of the 2020 election results. This concept is critical for understanding the severity of the political and legal context in which Trump operates.

Highlights

Legal troubles for former President Biden equated to election preference, despite not being the current President.

Investigative journalists and law professor David Cay Johnston discusses the financial situation of Donald Trump.

Trump may have to sell off assets due to financial constraints, as he has properties with underlying mortgages.

The issue of Trump inflating the value of his assets, claiming them worth more than what the market shows.

Trump's previous claims of being a billionaire called into question by David Cay Johnston.

Trump's portrayal of himself as a successful billionaire contrasted with the current situation of needing to sell assets.

Trump's claim of being worth over $10 billion during his campaign announcement.

The requirement for Trump to post a $1 billion bond and his difficulty in doing so.

Trump's potential financial maneuvers to handle the bond requirement.

The possibility of the state forcing the sale of Trump's properties if he fails to post the bond.

Trump's past legal issues and his approach to handling them.

The divisive rhetoric used by Trump, including comments about Jewish Democrats.

Concerns about Trump's extreme language and its potential impact on the country.

The perception of Trump as a victim and how his followers respond to his rhetoric.

The potential consequences of Trump's actions and rhetoric if he were to lose the presidency.

The importance of not discounting Trump's rhetoric as empty, given the events of January 6th.

The view that winning the presidency is Trump's only way out of his current legal and financial troubles.

Transcripts

00:00

>> YOU WERE

00:01

>> ALIVE IN THE CNN NEWSROOM

00:18

RULING ON TRUTH MAKE BASELESS

00:20

ACCUSATIONS. THAT IS LEGAL

00:20

TROUBLES EQUATE TO ELECTION

00:24

PREFERENCE, DESPITE THE FACT

00:24

THAT IS HE NOT PRESIDENT BIDEN,

00:25

WHO'S CHARGED WITH CONSPIRACY

00:27

TO OVERTURN A FREE AND FAIR

00:29

ELECTION, JOINING ME NOW IS LAW

00:30

PROFESSOR AT SYRACUSE

00:31

UNIVERSITY INVESTIGATIVE

00:32

JOURNALISTS, DAVID CAY

00:34

JOHNSTON. DAVID, GOOD

00:35

MORNING THIS

00:37

>> TRUTH, SOCIAL

00:39

>> POST WE OBVIOUSLY DON'T PUT

00:40

ALL OF THEM ON TV, BUT THIS ONE

00:41

STOOD OUT AS IT JUST CAME OUT

00:44

EARLIER THIS MORNING HE IS

00:46

BASICALLY SAYING HE'S GOING TO

00:47

HAVE TO SELL OFF ASSETS TO GET

00:49

OUT OF THIS SITUATION THAT

00:51

HE'S IN. YOU'VE BEEN LOOKING

00:52

INTO WHO IS FINANCIAL SITUATN

00:54

FOR YEARS? WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF

00:56

ALL THIS? IS HE GOING TO HAVE

00:58

TO SELL OFF ASSETS? IS THAT

01:00

COMING MAYBE SOON

01:04

>> I THINK IT . AND I THINK

01:04

IT'S SOON. DONALD HAS SOME

01:07

PROPERTIES THAT ARE VALUABLE,

01:08

BUT THEY HAVE UNDERLYING

01:09

MORTGAGES AND JUST LIKE HAPPENS

01:12

TO A HOMEOWNER, DONALDACES

01:13

THIS PROBLEM YOU HAVE A FIRST

01:15

MORTGAGE ON YOURROPERTY. YOU

01:17

NEED SOME MONEY. YOU SAY I'LL

01:18

GET A HEEL OFFER A SECOND

01:19

MORTGAGE THE FIRST BANK HAS TO

01:21

AGREE, AND I THINK IT'S PRTY

01:22

CLEAR THE FIRST BANKS ARE NOT

01:25

WILLING TO AGREE. SO THAT'S

01:27

VERY LIMITING ON DONALD AND THE

01:29

REASON THEY'RE LIKELY NOT TO

01:30

AGREE IS EXACTLY WHAT THIS CASE

01:32

IS ABOUT. INFLATING THE VALUE

01:34

OF ASSETS, CLAIMING THEIR

01:35

WORTH. IN SOME CASES, 16.30

01:39

TIMES WHAT THE MARKET SHOWS

01:40

THAT THEY'RE WORTH YEAH I MEAN

01:44

DAVID, I GUESS THERE'S THE

01:45

ISSUE OF I MEAN, DOES HE HAVE

01:46

THE MONEY

01:47

>> I

01:49

>> YOU KNOW, FOREARS HE HAS

01:50

TOLD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HE'S A

01:53

LLIONAIRE. HE'S RICH

01:54

>> HE HAD A

01:55

>> SHOW ALL ABOUT THIS. THE

01:56

APPRENTICE. HE WASN'T HOME

01:58

ALONE TWO AND SO ON. I MEAN,

02:00

THIS HAS BEEN HIS LIFE

02:01

PORTRAYING HIMSELF AS THIS YOU

02:03

KNOW AMERICAN STORY OF A

02:05

BILLIONAIRE WHO IS LARGER THAN

02:07

LIFE. AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN

02:09

HE'S SAYING YOU KNOW, WHAT'S

02:11

GOING ON. I HAVE TO SELL OFF

02:11

ALL MY ASSETS GEN. THIS HAS

02:15

ALWAYS BEEN A CON WABACK IN

02:19

1990 WHEN I SHOWED THE TRUMP

02:20

WAS IN A BILLIONAIRE, HE WENT

02:20

AROUND FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS

02:21

CALLING ME

02:23

>> A LIAR UNTIL HE HAD TO PUT A

02:24

DOCUMENT AND PUBLIC RECORD THAT

02:25

SHOWED THAT HE WAS NOT A

02:29

BILLIONAIRE AND LATER A

02:29

DOCUMENT SHOWING HE WAS WORTH

02:31

-320 $5 MILLION WHICH MES YOU

02:33

AND I ARE WORTH MORE THAN

02:34

DONALD TRU, AT LEAST AT THAT

02:35

TIME

02:37

>> TODAY. IT'S THE SAME THING

02:39

NINE YEARS AGO WHEN HE CAME

02:41

DOWN ESCALATOR TO ANNOUNCE HIS

02:43

CAMPAIGN, HE SAID HE WAS WORTH

02:44

MORE THAN 10 BILLION. IF YOU'RE

02:47

WORTH $10 BILLION, COMING UP

02:48

WITH A HALF 1 BILLION MAY BE

02:50

PAINFUL, BUT IT ISN'T THAT

02:51

HARD.

02:54

>> YEAH. AND HE IS SAYING THIS.

02:55

I MEAN, WE PUT THIS UP ON

02:56

SERINE, SAYS THAT THIS BOND

02:58

THAT HE ASKED TO PAY HIS QUOTE

03:00

UNCONSTITUTIONAL UN-AMERICAN

03:01

U

03:02

IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY COMPANY,

03:04

INCLUDING ONE AS SUCCESSFUL AS

03:05

MINE AGAIN, I MEAN, WHAT WE MAY

03:09

BE WITNESSING IN THE COMING

03:11

DAYS, HE HAS NO CHOICE.

03:12

>> RIGHT? HE IS GOING TO HAVE

03:13

TO DO SOMETHING, MAKE SOME KIND

03:16

OF FINANCIAL MANEUVER HERE. IN

03:18

ORDER TO POST THIS BOND RIGHT,

03:22

HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO APPEAL.

03:23

HE'S ALREADY FILED AN APPEAL

03:26

AND THAT WILL PROCEED. BUT IN

03:28

THE MEANTIME, UNLESS HE COMES

03:29

UP WITH THE BOND OR CASH OR

03:33

PERSUADES THE INTERMEDIATE

03:36

APPELLATE COURT IN NEW YORK TO

03:38

GET ALLOW HIM TO POST A SMALLER

03:40

AMOUNT OF MONEY HE WANTS TO PUT

03:41

UP $100 TROPIC TELLS YOU HOW

03:43

MUCH CASH HE HAS ACCESS TO THEN

03:50

THE STATE CAN MOVE TO BEGIN

03:51

FORCING THE SALE OF HIS

03:52

PROPERTIES AND THE STATE WILL

03:54

HAVE A DUTY AS WILL THE MONITOR

03:56

TO MAXIMIZE HIGHEST VALUE. BUT

03:58

THIS IS A RE SALE GYM. IT

04:00

WOULD BE A FIRE SALE IF THE

04:01

STATE DOES IT, IT'LL BE A FIRE

04:03

SALE. IF DONALD DO IT AND

04:06

HE'S KNOWN THIS IS COMING FOR

04:08

MONTHS AND HE HASN'T SET

04:09

HIMSELF UP TO TAKE CARE OF IT

04:12

AND HE CONTINUES TO ATTACK THE

04:13

JUDGE IN THE CASE AND THE OTHER

04:15

CIVIL SERVANTS OVERSEEING THESE

04:18

TRIALS, DESPITE BEING

04:18

REPEATEDLY TOLD D2

04:20

>> I MEAN, IS THERE ANYTHING AT

04:21

THIS POINT THAT GETS HIM TO

04:25

THIS ENORMOUS BOND, I SUPPOSE

04:27

YEAH, NO, THIS IS THIS IS JUST

04:29

COUP DONALD IS IN THE 2016

04:33

CAMPAIGN. HE WAS ASKED, WELL,

04:34

SINCE YOU'RE A CHRISTIAN, WHEN

04:35

WAS THE LAST TIME YOU ASK GOD

04:36

FOR FORGIVENESS AND DOWN SAID

04:38

WHAT WHAT, WHY WOULD I DO THAT?

04:40

I'VE NEVER DONE ANYTHING IN MY

04:41

LIFE THAT REQUIRES ASKING

04:43

FORGIVENESS THAT'S WHO HES.

04:45

HE BELIEVES THAT HE'S SPECIAL,

04:47

THAT WE SHOULD TREAT HIM AS

04:49

SPECIAL, AND THAT ANYTHING THAT

04:52

GOES AGAINST HIM WHILE YOU'RE

04:52

THE BAD GUY, THAT'S SOMETHING

04:54

THAT NOTORIOUS ROY COHN, TATI

04:55

LAW ENFORCEMENT COMES AFTER YOU

04:57

ATTACK THEM. THEY'RE DISHONEST,

04:59

THEY'RE CORRUPT. YOUR PURE AND

05:01

CLEAN

05:02

>> AND EVEN IF IT'S OBVIOUS

05:03

THAT SOMETHING YOU SAID ISN'T

05:06

TRUE, OR DID IS WRONG. YOU

05:07

NEVER, EVER GIVE AN INCH. YOU

05:10

JUST MAINTAIN YOUR LIVES AND

05:12

HE'S VERY GD AT DOING THAT

05:13

JOB

05:14

>> ALL RIGHT. DAVID CAY

05:15

JOHNSTON, I KNOW YOU'RE AN

05:16

EXPERT ON ALL THIS. THANK YOU

05:17

VERY MUCH FOR GIVING US YOUR

05:20

TIME THIS MORNING. WE REALLY

05:20

APPRECIATE IT.

05:21

>> ALL RIGHT. LET'S DISCUSS

05:22

MORE NOW. IT'S CNN'S KRISTEN

05:23

HOLMES, FORMER REPUBLICAN AND

05:25

JOE WALSH AND FOUNDER OF

05:26

DEMOCRACY DOCKET. MARC ELIAS

05:28

GUYS THANKS VERY MUCH FOR BEING

05:29

ON WITH HIS MARK. YOU'RE THERE

05:31

IN THE STUDIO. I'VE GOT

05:32

KRISTEN AND JOE NEXT TO ME, A

05:34

CRYSTALLINE START WITH YOU

05:38

FIRST. I MEAN, I WAS TALKING

05:39

ABOUT THIS WITH DAVID JUST A

05:40

FEW MOMENTS AGO FOR ARS. AND

05:41

YOU AND I KNOW THIS, WE'RE OUT

05:41

ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL TOGETHER.

05:42

TRUMP AND HIS AIDES AND HIS

05:43

ALLIES HAVE TALKED ABOUT HOW

05:44

MUCH MONEY HE HAS, HOW RICHIE

05:45

AS IT'S ALL OF A SUDDEN NOW

05:46

HE'S SAYING HE HAS TO SELL OFF

05:48

THESE ASSETS. HOW DOES TRUMP

05:49

WORLD MAKE ANY SENSE OF THIS?

05:50

WHAT DO THEY SAY?

05:54

>> WELL, ONE THING TO NOTE ALSO

05:54

IS THAT IT'S KIND OF HIS

05:55

PROFESSIONAL BRAND AND HIS

05:56

POLITICAL BRAND. YEAH, HE TELLS

05:56

PEOPLE, OH, LOOK HOW RICH I AM.

05:57

I COULD MAKE YOU THIS RICH IF

05:58

YOU LIKE ME INTO OFFICE AND

05:59

THAT REALLY WAS A SELLING POINT

06:00

FOR HIM IN 2016, PARTICULARLY

06:03

WHEN YOU TALK TO WORKING CLASS

06:05

VOTERS. NOW, IF YOU, HIS TEAM

06:06

ABOUT WHAT EXACTLY THEY'RE

06:07

DOING OR WHAT THEY THINK OF

06:08

THIS THEY POINT TO TWO THINGS.

06:09

THEY ARGUE THAT THERE'S NO

06:11

BILLIONAIRE ON THIS PLANET. WHO

06:13

IS THAT LIQUID? WHO COULD COME

06:14

UP WITH THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY.

06:14

THEY ALSO BLAME THE

06:17

UNDERWRITERS AND THEY SAY THAT

06:18

THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GO

06:19

ANYTHING OVER 100 MILLION. AND

06:22

IF YOU DO TALK TO FINANCIAL

06:22

EXPERTS, THERE'S A LITTLE BIT

06:24

OF A GRAY AREA THERE BECAUSE

06:25

USUALLY YOU D'T HAVE TO COME

06:26

UP WITH HALF 1 BILLION.

06:26

>> IT'S A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF

06:28

RIGHT, SO IT'S

06:30

>> NOT LIKE THERE'S A PRECEDENT

06:31

FOR THIS THAT HE ARE SAYING

06:31

THIS AND IT'S NOT TRUE, IT'S

06:32

JUST LIKE WELL, LOT OF THESE

06:34

UNDERWRITERS AND URBAN ASKED

06:36

ABOUT HALF 1 BILLION. THEY'VE

06:37

BEEN ASKED ABOUT LOWER SAAB'S

06:39

06:39

>> BUT AS DAVID WAS SAYING,

06:40

THEY'VE KWN ABOUT THIS FOR

06:41

MONTHS IT'S NOT THAT HE JUST

06:42

HAD TO BECOME LIQUID OVERNIGHT.

06:43

THEY HAD TIME TO DEAL WITH IT.

06:45

SO THE QUESTION IS, WHAT

06:47

EXACTLY HAPPENS NEXT, YOU CAN

06:48

HEAR, OBVIOUSLY DONALD TRUMP IS

06:50

RANTING ON SOCIAL MEDIA SAYING

06:51

THIS IS UNFAIR. I'M GOING TO

06:52

HAVE TO SELL MY ASSE. I THINK

06:56

06:56

>> THEY HOPE THAT THERE IS

06:57

GOING TO BE A STOP TO THIS SO

06:59

THAT WHEN THEY CAN HELIX

07:00

THAT'S AT HE'S ARGUING FOR,

07:00

THAT HE WANTS TO SAY THAT HE

07:02

DOESN'T HAVE TO PAY UNTIL

07:03

AFTER HIS APPEALAND THAT'S

07:05

SOMETHING WE'LL COME THROUGH,

07:06

BUT IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT DELAY,

07:07

DELAY, DELAY.

07:08

>> HOW FAR CAN WE PUSH THIS

07:09

OFF? ZACH

07:11

>> WHEN THE BILL COMES TO

07:12

ENJOY, DID WANT TO ASK YOU IN

07:13

MARK, I WANTED TO TALK TO YOU

07:14

ABOUT THIS AS WELL. TRUMP'S

07:17

CONTINUING USE OF THIS EXTREME

07:19

VERY VOLATILE LANGER WHICH LAST

07:20

NIGHT HE MADE SOME COMMENTS

07:22

ABOUT JEWISH DEMOCRATS IN

07:23

ISRAEL. JOE, YOU AND I'VE

07:26

TALKED ABOUT ISRAEL LOTS OF

07:27

TIMES. LET'S LISTEN TO THIS,

07:28

TALK ABOUT THE OTHER SIDE

07:29

>> ANY JEWISH PERSON THAT VOTES

07:31

FOR DEMOCRATS HATES THEIR

07:36

RELIGION. THEY ATE EVERYTHING

07:38

ABOUT ISRAEL AND THEY SHOULD BE

07:39

ASHAMED OF THEMSELS HOUSE

07:40

BECAUSE ISRAEL WL BE

07:41

DESTROYED

07:44

>> YEAH, JOE, WHAT DID YOU

07:45

THINK WHEN YOU SAW THAT

07:46

>> IT'S IT'S JUST DIVISIVE

07:48

EVERY SINGLE WORD GYM THAT HE

07:50

IS UTTERING AND WILL UTTER

07:52

DURING THIS CAMPAIGN IS

07:54

DIVISIVE, DIVIDING JEWISH

07:55

PEOPLE, DIVIDING AMERICANS

07:59

IT'S, IT'S NOT GOING TO STOP.

08:00

LET'S, HE'S THE LEADER OF THE

08:01

REPUBLICAN PARTY. HE'S THE

08:03

REPUBLICAN PAR NOMINEE. HE'S

08:04

BEEN A FRAUD AND A CON MAN HIS

08:06

WHOLE LIFE. IN THIS ENTIRE

08:08

CAMPAIGN, JIM IS GOING TO BE

08:10

ABOUT HIM BEGINNING TO BE HELD

08:12

ACCOUNTABLE. FOR THOSE CRIMES

08:15

IN ALL THESEONNA DO IS CRY

08:17

AND MOAN ABOUT IT. BUT HIS

08:19

FOLLOWERS LOVE IT BECAUSE HE'S

08:20

THE GREAT VICTIM.

08:22

>> AND WHAT ELSE IS YOU'RE

08:23

GOING TO SAY AT THIS POINT? BUT

08:24

MARK, I DIDN'T WANT TO GO TO

08:25

YOU ON THIS BECAUSE I MEAN,

08:26

THERE WAS ALSO WHAT TRUMP WAS

08:28

SAYING OVER THE WEEKEND. HE

08:30

EXTREME TERMS ABOUT THE ERY

08:32

POTENTIAL DANGEROUS TO THE

08:32

COUNTRY IT DOESN'T WIN IN

08:35

NOVEMBER, HE'S USED WORDS LIKE

08:36

BLOODBATH AND BEDLAM. WHAT ARE

08:40

SPEAKING IN THESE TERMS? AND

08:42

WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE

08:42

COUNTRY

08:44

>> YES SO FIRST OF, ALL LET ME

08:45

JUST SAY, I A PROUD JEWISH

08:47

DEMOCRAT.

08:48

>> I WAS, I WAS

08:49

>> I HAD BEEN A DEMOCRAT MY

08:50

ENTIRE LIFE. I'VE BEEN A JEW MY

08:53

ENTIRE LIFE. I HAVE IN A LOVING

08:55

COMMUNITY OF FAMILY AND OTHER

08:57

JEWS WHO ARE PROUD DEMOCRATS.

08:58

AND SO DONALD TRUMP IS SOWING

09:00

THE SAME KIND OF ANTI-SEMITIC

09:03

AND WRONGFUL LIFE THAT HE HAS

09:05

THROUGHOUT HIS ENTIRE CAREER.

09:06

BUT TO YOUR QUESTION JIM WE SAW

09:11

IN 2020 THAT DONALD TRUMP WOULD

09:13

SAY A LOT OF OUTRAGEOUS THINGS.

09:14

AND IT WAS DISCOUNTED BY, BY

09:16

MANY, MANY REPUBLICANS AND TOO

09:19

MANY WELL-INTENTIONED PEOPLE AS

09:20

JUST EMPTY RHETORIC THAT YOU

09:23

SHOULD, YOU SHOULD TAKE HIM

09:25

FIGURATIVELY, BUT NOT

09:26

LITERALLY. WELL, JANUARY 6

09:28

SHOWED US THAT WHEN HE WANTS AN

09:30

INSURRECTION, HE WILL SUMMON AN

09:33

INSURRECTION. WHEN HE SAYS HE,

09:34

THERE WILL BE A BLOODBATH. IT

09:36

IS TIME THAT WE STOPPED

09:37

DISCOUNTING IT AND SP FINDING

09:40

HI, IS THAT HIS BACKS AGAINST

09:42

THE WALL? HIS BACK IS AGAINST

09:43

THE WALL IN THE CIVIL CASES IS

09:45

BACK AS AGAINST THE WALL ITHE

09:46

CRIMINAL CASES THAT COULD SEND

09:47

HIM TO PRISON. AND HE VIEWS AS

09:49

WINNING THE PRESIDENCY AS HIS

09:51

ONLY TICKET OUT. SO AS

09:52

DESPERATE AS HE WAS IN 2020, AS

09:54

WILLING HIS HE WAS TO BREAK THE

09:55

RULE OF LAW IN 2020 AND AND TO