Republican VISIBLY CRUMBLES in PAINFUL Interview!

Pondering Politics
24 Mar 202414:55

Summary

TLDRThe transcript describes an interview with Republican Senator Marco Rubio, conducted by Jonathan Carl of ABC, highlighting Rubio's apparent discomfort and perceived subservience to former President Donald Trump. The video script contrasts Rubio's past criticisms of Trump with his current supportive stance, questioning his credibility and integrity. It also touches on Trump's assertions of legal immunity and Rubio's defense of these claims, despite their potential implications for the rule of law.

Takeaways

  • 😰 Marco Rubio's interview with Jonathan Carl of ABC was described as highly uncomfortable and potentially damaging to his image.
  • πŸ€” Rubio's past criticisms of Donald Trump, referring to him as a 'con artist' and mocking his appearance, were highlighted, contrasting sharply with his current support.
  • πŸ”„ The video script points out Rubio's significant shift from being a leading candidate in the 2016 Republican primaries to fading into the background.
  • πŸ›οΈ Rubio's potential consideration as Trump's running mate in the upcoming election was discussed, with Rubio stating it would be an honor but denying any direct communication with Trump regarding it.
  • 🌎 Rubio defended Trump's presidency, claiming the country was safer and more prosperous under his leadership, despite the pandemic and other crises.
  • 🀯 The script accuses Rubio of downplaying Trump's role in inciting the Capitol insurrection and instead blames Joe Biden for various global crises.
  • πŸ‘Š Rubio's stance on Trump's legal immunity was scrutinized, with the script suggesting Rubio is defending Trump's assertion of absolute legal immunity despite past criticisms.
  • πŸ’­ The video script suggests Rubio's behavior is indicative of the power and influence Trump holds over the Republican party, causing individuals to compromise their previous stances.
  • 🚫 The script concludes with a call for Rubio to 'slither back into the shadows,' implying his political relevance and credibility have diminished.
  • πŸ“‰ Rubio's uncomfortable demeanor and stammering answers during the interview were emphasized, suggesting a loss of charisma and public trust.

Q & A

  • What was the nature of the interview between Marco Rubio and Jonathan Carl?

    -The interview between Marco Rubio, a Republican senator from Florida, and Jonathan Carl of ABC was described as one of the most excruciating interactions between a Republican politician and the press, where Rubio appeared visibly uncomfortable.

  • How has Marco Rubio's political stature changed since his 2016 presidential run?

    -Marco Rubio was once a prominent figure in the Republican party and a leading candidate for the presidency in 2016. However, since then, he has faded into the background, with his political influence diminished, particularly after Donald Trump's presidency.

  • What were some of the derogatory terms used by Donald Trump and Marco Rubio against each other during their 2016 presidential campaigns?

    -Donald Trump referred to Marco Rubio as 'Little Marco' and made fun of his appearance and stature. Rubio, in turn, criticized Trump as a 'con artist' and highlighted his lack of policy knowledge and personal attacks.

  • What is the rumor about Marco Rubio's potential role in the upcoming election?

    -There are rumors that Donald Trump may select Marco Rubio to be his running mate for the year's election, which is why Rubio is being paraded in the media.

  • How did Marco Rubio respond to the possibility of being Trump's running mate?

    -Rubio stated that it would be an honor to be offered a spot on Trump's ticket but clarified that he has never spoken to Trump or anyone on his team about the vice presidency.

  • What was Marco Rubio's stance on the state of the country under Donald Trump's presidency?

    -Rubio claimed that the United States was safer and more prosperous under Trump's presidency, and that relations in the Western Hemisphere were strong during that time.

  • How did Marco Rubio address the criticism of Donald Trump's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic?

    -Rubio did not directly address the criticism but instead focused on the prosperity and safety under Trump's administration, ignoring the impact of the pandemic.

  • What did Marco Rubio say about the current state of the country under President Joe Biden?

    -Rubio criticized Biden's presidency, claiming that there is a new crisis or conflict every day, and he blamed Biden for the invasion of Ukraine and other global issues.

  • What was the main point of contention between Jonathan Carl and Marco Rubio during their discussion on Donald Trump's legal immunity?

    -Jonathan Carl questioned Rubio about Trump's assertion that the president should have absolute legal immunity, and Rubio's uncomfortable defense of this stance was highlighted.

  • How did Marco Rubio justify his support for Donald Trump despite their past disagreements?

    -Rubio did not directly justify his support but focused on the importance of serving the country as vice president and the honor of being offered such a position, regardless of the candidate.

  • What was the commentator's final assessment of Marco Rubio's performance in the interview?

    -The commentator concluded that Rubio's performance was uncomfortable and debasing, suggesting that he should fade back into the background due to his lack of charisma and credibility.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ“Ί Marco Rubio's Controversial Interview and Political Transformation

This paragraph discusses a highly uncomfortable interview between Marco Rubio and Jonathan Carl, portraying Rubio in a negative light and suggesting a fall from grace within the Republican Party. Initially, Rubio was a prominent figure and a presidential candidate in 2016, but his stature seemingly diminished post-Trump presidency. The script critiques Rubio's lack of opposition to Trump, despite past animosities, highlighting rumors of Rubio being considered as Trump's running mate. It reminisces about the vitriolic exchanges between Rubio and Trump, using these to underscore Rubio's current weakened political stance, likening him to 'Reek' from Game of Thronesβ€”a shadow of his former self, unable to defy Trump.

05:00

πŸ” Analyzing Rubio's Support for Trump and Criticism of Biden

This segment delves into Rubio's reasoning for supporting Trump, despite their past conflicts, and his criticisms of Joe Biden's presidency. Rubio's endorsement of Trump for the vice presidency is scrutinized, juxtaposed with his previous condemnations of Trump, painting a picture of political inconsistency. The paragraph further explores Rubio's attempts to blame Biden for various global and domestic issues, presenting this as an extreme case of 'Biden Derangement Syndrome.' Through a detailed examination of Rubio's arguments and the counterpoints presented by the interviewer, this section portrays Rubio as struggling to justify his political positions and alliances.

10:02

πŸ€” Marco Rubio's Legal and Ethical Justifications for Trump

The final paragraph highlights Rubio's awkward defense of Trump's claim to absolute legal immunity and his own conflicting views on legal accountability for presidents. It emphasizes Rubio's discomfort and inconsistency when confronted with his past criticisms of Trump and current attempts to downplay those criticisms. The narrative suggests Rubio is engaged in mental gymnastics to align with Trump while trying to maintain some semblance of legal and moral standards. This portrayal underscores the broader issue of political loyalty over principles within the Republican Party, as Rubio navigates the complexities of supporting Trump amidst ongoing legal and ethical controversies.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio is a Republican senator from Florida who was a leading candidate for the presidency in 2016. In the video, he is depicted as having significantly changed his political stance, particularly in relation to his previous criticism of Donald Trump and his current support for Trump's potential re-election.

πŸ’‘Donald Trump

Donald Trump is the 45th President of the United States and a central figure in the video. He is portrayed as having a significant influence over the Republican party, including Marco Rubio, despite their past contentious relationship.

πŸ’‘Biden Derangement Syndrome

Biden Derangement Syndrome is a term used in the video to describe an alleged irrational and extreme negative reaction to President Joe Biden's policies and actions, similar to the concept of 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' It suggests that critics of Biden are unable to recognize or acknowledge any positive aspects of his presidency.

πŸ’‘Political Posture

Political Posture refers to the stance or position a politician adopts on various issues, which can sometimes change based on political expediency or party loyalty. In the context of the video, Rubio's political posture is highlighted as having shifted from opposition to support for Trump.

πŸ’‘Secondhand Embarrassment

Secondhand Embarrassment is a feeling of embarrassment experienced on behalf of someone else, often due to their actions or behavior. In the video, the audience is warned that they might feel secondhand embarrassment while watching Rubio's uncomfortable interview.

πŸ’‘Con Artist

A Con Artist is someone who deceives others through trickery or fraud for personal gain. In the video, this term is used to describe Trump, as Rubio had previously criticized him as a 'con artist' during their political rivalry.

πŸ’‘Legal Immunity

Legal Immunity refers to the protection from legal liability or prosecution. In the context of the video, it discusses the idea that Trump believes he should have absolute immunity from legal consequences while in office, which Rubio seems to partially support.

πŸ’‘Public Defiance

Public Defiance is the act of openly resisting or refusing to comply with someone or something. In the video, Rubio is portrayed as being unable to publicly defy Trump, indicating a lack of courage or independence in his political actions.

πŸ’‘Political Cult

A Political Cult refers to a group of people who follow a charismatic leader with extreme devotion, often unquestioningly accepting the leader's views and directives. In the video, the term is used to describe the loyalty some Republicans, including Rubio, show towards Trump.

πŸ’‘Shift in Political Stance

A Shift in Political Stance is when a politician changes their position or opinion on a particular issue or set of issues. The video highlights Rubio's significant shift from being a vocal critic of Trump to becoming one of his supporters.

πŸ’‘Political Accountability

Political Accountability refers to the responsibility that politicians have to explain and justify their actions, especially when they are under scrutiny or face criticism. In the video, Rubio's lack of accountability for his shift in stance is criticized, particularly in relation to his previous strong opposition to Trump.

Highlights

Marco Rubio, a Republican senator from Florida, was interviewed by Jonathan Carl of ABC in an uncomfortable and excruciating interaction.

Rubio was once a prominent figure in the Republican party and a leading candidate for the presidency in 2016.

Since losing to Donald Trump, Rubio has faded into the background, with rumors suggesting he might be Trump's running mate in the upcoming election.

The video creator reminds viewers of the hostile public exchanges between Rubio and Trump during the 2016 campaign.

Rubio's posture and demeanor during the interview suggest a significant change from his previous self-assured persona.

Rubio claims it would be an honor to serve as Vice President but denies having any conversations with Trump or his team regarding the position.

Despite the violent insurrection at the Capitol, Rubio argues that the country was safer and more prosperous under Trump's presidency.

Rubio blames the current administration for various global crises, including the situation in Ukraine and Afghanistan.

Rubio's comments on Biden's presidency reflect a severe case of 'Biden derangement syndrome,' according to the video creator.

The video contrasts Rubio's past criticism of Trump as a 'con artist' with his current support for the former president.

Rubio defends Trump's assertion that the president should have absolute immunity from legal proceedings while in office.

The video creator suggests that Rubio's shift in stance is indicative of the power and influence Trump holds over the Republican party.

Rubio's discomfort and stammering during the interview are highlighted as signs of his internal conflict and the pressure he faces.

The video ends with a call for Rubio to return to the shadows, as he is seen as lacking credibility and charisma.

The video creator argues that Rubio's behavior is a reflection of the broader threat posed by Trump's influence on the Republican party and the country.

Transcripts

00:00

a visibly uncomfortable Marco Rubio

00:02

Republican senator from Florida and

00:04

Perpetual coward and loser was

00:06

interviewed by Jonathan Carl of ABC and

00:09

what followed was one of the most

00:11

excruciating interactions I've ever seen

00:13

between a republican politician and the

00:15

press in which Rubio further disgraced

00:17

himself in front of the American people

00:19

something I didn't think would be

00:21

possible but before we unpack all that

00:23

if you end up liking this video and you

00:25

want to support the Channel please be

00:26

sure to hit the like subscribe and alert

00:28

Bell before you go I'd greatly

00:30

appreciate it all right friends I'm

00:32

warning you right now if you struggle

00:34

with secondhand embarrassment if seeing

00:36

people just disintegrate before you

00:39

makes you uncomfortable this is going to

00:41

be tough to watch Marco Rubio believe it

00:44

or not used to be a prominent name in

00:46

the Republican party and in America I

00:47

mean he my God he was one of um the

00:50

leading candidates for the presidency in

00:52

2016 at least on the Republican side and

00:55

since then he's basically because he

00:57

lost all his vertebrae when you know

00:59

Donald Trump assumed the presidency and

01:01

basically removed Marco Rubio's spine uh

01:04

Marco Rubio basically faded into the

01:06

background as more deranged and bold

01:08

Republicans stepped up to replace him

01:10

but every now and then Rubio comes out

01:12

of the woodwork and apparently there are

01:14

rumors that Donald Trump May select

01:16

Rubio to be his running mate for this

01:18

year's election so I assume that's why

01:20

they're parading him out now before I

01:22

get to again these awkward uncomfortable

01:25

Clips I want to remind you in a bit of a

01:27

pallet cleanser of what Marco Rubio and

01:30

Donald Trump used to say about each

01:32

other publicly this is important I will

01:35

address uh you know little Rubio Little

01:38

Marco Little Marco you know Marco Little

01:41

Marco he's always calling me Little

01:43

Marco he's little l d d La little little

01:48

little Marco Donald is not going to make

01:51

America great he's going to make America

01:53

orange he was putting on makeup with a

01:55

Trel like a guy with the worst spray tan

01:58

in America is attacking me for putting

02:01

on makeup I never saw a human being

02:04

sweat like this guy he doesn't sweat cuz

02:06

his pores are clogged from the spray tan

02:08

that he uses I will not say that he was

02:10

trying to cover up his ears then he

02:12

asked for a fulllength mirror maybe to

02:14

make sure his pants weren't wet I don't

02:15

know little mouth on him bing bing bing

02:18

bing bing bing bing bing we have a con

02:20

artist as the front runner in the

02:22

Republican Party Listen to This Light

02:24

little nothing say Trump aan man I mean

02:27

this guy bankrupted a casino how do you

02:29

bankrupt the casino the problem with

02:31

Marco he's a choke artist he chokes have

02:33

you seen his hands they're like this he

02:36

hit my hands nobody is ever hit my hands

02:38

look at those hands are they small hands

02:41

and you know what they say about men

02:42

with small hands I guarantee you there's

02:44

no problem I guarantee well I don't know

02:47

anything about bankrupting four

02:48

companies

02:50

bankrupt as you can tell there was a

02:53

time when these two not only didn't get

02:54

along they seemingly despised each other

02:57

and took every opportunity not just to

02:59

disagree on policy Donald Trump

03:00

obviously knows nothing about policy but

03:02

to make vicious personal attacks at each

03:05

other well now Marco Rubio if you've

03:08

ever watched Game of Thrones is

03:09

effectively reek he is a shadow of his

03:11

former self nowhere nearest Define you

03:13

can even see it in his posture he's

03:14

hunched forward he can't possibly bring

03:17

himself to publicly defy the cult leader

03:19

Donald Trump and that will be made

03:21

abundantly clear in the clips I'm about

03:23

to show you and I want you to remember

03:25

one of the segments or one of the little

03:28

bits in the clip that I just played the

03:29

Montage in which he refers to Trump as a

03:31

con artist keep that in the back of your

03:33

mind but yeah we're going to play some

03:35

of these clips and we're going to unpack

03:36

them together I want to turn to politics

03:39

there was some reporting this week that

03:41

you are possibly under consideration to

03:43

be Donald Trump's running mate I don't

03:45

put a lot of stock in this reporting

03:46

right now we're we're early uh but you

03:48

said it would be an honor to be offered

03:49

a spot on his ticket really yeah I think

03:52

anyone who's offered the opportunity to

03:53

serve this country as Vice President

03:54

should be honored by the opportunity to

03:56

do it if you're in public service I'm in

03:58

the Senate cuz I want to serve the

03:59

country being vice president is an

04:00

important way to serve the country but

04:02

I've also been clear I've never talked

04:04

to Donald Trump I've never talked to

04:05

anybody on his team or family or Inner

04:07

Circle about vice president that's a

04:09

decision he's going to make he has

04:10

plenty of really good people to pick

04:12

from I mean the reason why I asked is I

04:13

mean look what happened to the last guy

04:15

uh I mean a mob stormed the capital

04:18

literally calling to hang Mike Pence and

04:21

Trump defended those chance of hang Mike

04:23

Pence I will tell you this that when

04:25

Donald Trump was President the United

04:26

States this country was safer it was

04:28

more prosperous we had we had relations

04:30

for example in a part of the world that

04:32

I care about called the Western

04:33

Hemisphere that that that were very

04:35

strong we had a lot of good things done

04:36

there I think the country and the world

04:38

was a better place when he was

04:39

president okay so a couple of things

04:41

even granting let's assume that that's

04:44

the case we have no reason to grant that

04:45

that's the case as a matter of fact we

04:46

have plenty of reason to believe

04:47

otherwise given that Donald Trump was

04:50

president in 2020 during the covid

04:52

pandemic in which the economy cratered

04:55

and hundreds of thousands of Americans

04:56

died ultimately a million in large part

04:58

because of Donald Trump's mismanagement

05:00

of the pandemic just setting all that

05:03

aside you also have to prove that for

05:05

whatever Prosperity you saw in this

05:07

country and in the world Donald Trump

05:09

was responsible for it again Republicans

05:11

do this all the time not only do they

05:12

shave 2020 off of Donald Trump's

05:15

four-year term they just basically give

05:16

him three years and hope that we forget

05:18

about the fourth year they also say hey

05:20

because this thing occurred while Trump

05:22

was President Trump was responsible for

05:24

it he gets the credit unless it's a bad

05:26

thing that happened while Donald Trump

05:27

was president and then that doesn't

05:28

count he shouldn't get the blame for it

05:30

they do this awkward Jerry mandering

05:31

that we should endlessly Mock and point

05:34

out but the other thing

05:36

is the point that Jonathan Carl made

05:38

about Donald Trump's previous vice

05:40

president is something worth addressing

05:42

given that not only did Donald Trump

05:45

rile up a mob with murderous Intentions

05:48

by the way towards then vice president

05:50

Mike Pence as we've discussed Mike Pence

05:52

over the past week or so has publicly

05:55

declared that he will refuse to endorse

05:58

Donald Trump for a second terms so maybe

06:00

Marco Rubio should keep that in mind

06:01

that a fellow Republican Donald Trump's

06:03

former vice president a man who

06:05

presumably knows Trump and has worked

06:06

with Trump much more closely than even

06:08

Rubio uh won't endorse him for a second

06:10

term so maybe that undermines Rubio's

06:13

entire endorsement of trump now with

06:15

that in mind I want to play this next

06:17

clip which is a continuation of the

06:18

first in which Marco

06:21

Rubio um then does the inverse of

06:23

everything that he just did with Trump

06:25

and he displays

06:27

fullon chronic

06:30

perhaps I don't know just really bad

06:33

Biden derangement syndrome Biden

06:36

derangement syndrome you'll kind of be

06:38

shocked at how far he takes this who's

06:40

there now Joe Biden who's been a

06:42

disaster economically look look at the

06:44

world every single day we wake to a new

06:46

crisis to a new conflict everything has

06:48

gone on fire since the time Joe Biden

06:49

took over Afghanistan's gone down

06:51

Ukraine has been invaded now the

06:53

Philippines and the Chinese are on the

06:55

verge of something bad happening every

06:56

single day not to mention the threats to

06:58

Taiwan we we have this blow up in Haiti

07:00

going on in our very own hemisphere we

07:02

wake up every single day terrorist

07:03

attacks 9 million people across the

07:05

border you're not suggesting that's all

07:07

happening because of Biden absolutely I

07:11

absolutely I'm suggesting it happening

07:12

because of Biden he's president and his

07:14

weakness and his it's because of Biden

07:16

that that that Russia invaded Ukraine

07:18

it's because of Biden that that that

07:20

Haiti okay absolutely I mean Putin is

07:22

sitting there saying these guys can't

07:23

even stand up to the Taliban and they

07:24

have to fly people hanging off the wings

07:26

of these airplanes Now's the Time to go

07:28

it's and by the way I mean Trump's the

07:30

one saying that that suggesting that

07:32

that there should be a deal that g

07:33

effectively gives uh Putin what he wants

07:36

in Ukraine but can we take that's not

07:37

true what he has said is he wants the

07:39

conflict to end which is striking to me

07:40

that people why wouldn't people want

07:42

peace what I've said is there is going

07:44

to be a negotiated so Russia's not going

07:45

to take all of Ukraine and Ukraine's not

07:47

going to push Russia back to the where

07:48

it was in 2014 I want Ukraine to have

07:51

the upper hand in any

07:53

negotiation but Donald Trump has made it

07:55

abundantly clear while he was in office

07:57

when he attempted to extort Ukrainian

08:00

President Vladimir zalinski in order to

08:02

dig up dirt on Joe Biden his then

08:03

domestic political rival which is

08:05

insanely corrupt and Rubio would be

08:07

shouting from the rooftops if a Democrat

08:09

ever attempted to do that to a

08:11

republican but of course because

08:12

Democrats are morally and ethically

08:13

superior to elected Republicans

08:15

something like that's not going to

08:17

happen but I digress you see the slight

08:19

of hand there Jonathan Carl points out

08:21

well well listen if you're talking about

08:23

you know appeasing Putin Trump has

08:26

publicly said that he does want to

08:27

appease Putin he's publicly appeased and

08:29

praised Putin in the past so why should

08:31

we believe that Putin would behave

08:33

differently if Trump was in power for uh

08:36

a second term why would we believe that

08:39

and again note the Biden derangement

08:41

syndrome he literally blames everything

08:44

bad in the world on Joe Biden Jonathan

08:46

Carl couldn't even believe it he was

08:47

just like wait wait a minute surely you

08:49

don't believe that all of the world's

08:51

problems are Joe Biden's fault and Marco

08:53

Rubio with a straight face yeah of

08:54

course it is it's all Joe Biden's fault

08:57

that is Biden derangement syndrome that

09:00

is more of a derangement syndrome than

09:02

anything we've heard from critics of

09:04

trump about Trump trump derangement

09:07

syndrome is nothing in comparison to Joe

09:09

Biden is literally responsible for all

09:11

the problems in the world super weird

09:13

stuff but if you think that was

09:15

uncomfortable watching him stammer

09:16

through these answers you need to watch

09:18

this and now we're coming full circle

09:20

because Jonathan Carl hits Marco Rubio

09:23

with Marco Rubio down memory lane while

09:25

we're talking about this this was you in

09:28

2016

09:30

what we are dealing with here my friends

09:32

is a con artist he is a con artist first

09:37

of all he runs on this idea that he is

09:39

fighting for the little guy but he has

09:41

spent his entire career sticking it to

09:44

the little guy you all have friends that

09:46

are thinking about voting for Donald

09:47

Trump friends do not let friends vote

09:49

for

09:50

conard friends do not let friends vote

09:53

for you know I could have gone on I

09:55

could have played more but so so why

09:56

didn't you play the clip of KLA Harris

09:58

basically insinuating the Biden was a

09:59

segregation debate stage she's now his

10:01

vice president we play that but but but

10:03

let me ask you we didn't play it now

10:05

that was then yeah that was then but it

10:06

was a campaign okay okay but but let me

10:08

ask you right now where we are right now

10:11

Donald Trump is is making the case and

10:13

he's going to do it before The Supreme

10:15

Court that the president of the United

10:17

States should have absolute immunity

10:19

should effectively be above the law for

10:21

virtually anything that a president does

10:23

while in office you don't agree with

10:25

that do well I don't so I don't think

10:27

that on the case of immunity there's two

10:28

separate issues here one is can the

10:30

president do anything can he go out and

10:31

basically you know kill one of members

10:33

of his staff overnight inside the White

10:35

House obviously that's an absurd outcome

10:37

and that's a common crime but I do think

10:38

there's a legitimate issue here that we

10:39

need to talk about RIT large especially

10:41

after what we've seen the last three

10:42

years is do we want to live in a country

10:45

where basically the opponents of a

10:46

president can can can extort them can

10:49

have leverage over them during their

10:51

entire presidency and say don't worry

10:52

once you're out of office we're going to

10:54

prosecute you we're going to come after

10:55

you we're going to charge you for this

10:56

crime we're going to charge that CRI

10:57

absolutely he's he's saying absolutely

11:00

I mean we'll seean we you know this goes

11:02

before The Supreme Court argum as a guy

11:05

R he's not representing himself at the

11:07

Supreme Court Lawyers will make that

11:08

argument but we're living in a country

11:10

now where basically if you're president

11:11

now you have to think to yourself I got

11:13

to be careful what I do as president not

11:14

even legal or illegal even on policy

11:16

because if I upset the wrong people as

11:18

soon as I leave you should be careful

11:20

not to break the laws well but but but

11:22

you look at these prosecutions that are

11:23

coming about you've got this lady clear

11:25

partisan in New York who's basically

11:27

Prosecuting the president over loans

11:29

something that's never been done to

11:30

anybody before the banks who supposedly

11:33

the victims of what they claim are all

11:34

saying we don't even rely on what the

11:36

president's statements are we do our own

11:37

internal investigation to see if the

11:39

properties are worth what they're worth

11:41

and you've got a judgment on them that's

11:43

just so that was really awkward that was

11:46

really awkward for Marco Rubio to try to

11:49

run defense and carry water for Trump's

11:52

assertions that he is entitled to

11:54

Absolute legal immunity I mean just

11:55

super awkward Donald Trump makes no

11:58

exception with these things and now

12:00

Rubio says well his lawyers will argue

12:01

something different okay sure but Trump

12:04

the actual presidential candidate says

12:07

and seems to believe that he should be

12:09

above the law it doesn't matter what

12:10

Trump's attorneys argue they have a more

12:13

sophisticated understanding of the law

12:14

and they could probably couch it in

12:16

better legal EAS than Trump can but

12:18

isn't it really weird and uncomfortable

12:21

and dangerous that the guy you're

12:23

pledging allegiance to who you used to

12:25

publicly mock seems to have that sense

12:27

of entitlement Marco if Barack Obama or

12:30

Joe Biden were running around saying

12:32

that they should be entitled to Absolute

12:34

immunity what would you as a republican

12:36

say you wouldn't appeal to their

12:38

attorneys you would of course decry that

12:40

language as well you should because that

12:43

sort of language and rhetoric and

12:44

sentiment is dangerous no matter who

12:46

it's coming from a Democratic

12:48

presidential candidate or a Republican

12:50

presidential candidate but as is often

12:51

the case the bad stuff uniquely comes

12:53

from the Republican and if you had any

12:56

sort of integrity and spine whatsoever

12:58

you would call it out and say no Donald

13:00

you were not entitled nor should you be

13:02

nor should anybody be entitled to

13:03

Absolute legal immunity but listen Marco

13:07

Rubio a member of the party of Law and

13:09

Order and personal accountability is

13:12

making excuses and he seems to be very

13:13

upset clutching his pearls that Donald

13:15

Trump seems to be facing Law and Order

13:19

and personal accountability or at least

13:20

legal accountability since he himself

13:22

won't take any but just watching him

13:24

bend over backwards especially when you

13:26

know Jonathan Carl plays that clip and

13:28

then this idea that why didn't you play

13:29

stuff that kamla Harris ever said about

13:32

Joe Biden well number one you're not KLA

13:34

Harris why the hell would Jonathan Carl

13:36

Play a clip about kamla Harris or of

13:38

kamla Harris when you're not kamla

13:40

Harris and the question has nothing to

13:41

do with kamla Harris he just so weird

13:44

and cringe and ridiculous and by the way

13:46

vice president Harris said nothing to

13:48

the extent or frequency against

13:50

President Biden then Joe Biden uh that

13:53

Marco Rubio said about Donald Trump like

13:54

against apples and oranges is it true

13:57

that uh Prim candidates tend to take

14:00

shots at each other yes but Rubio Trump

14:03

Cruz and Trump uh Lindsey Graham and

14:06

Trump they went infinitely harder in the

14:08

paint and it was infinitely more

14:10

personal and consistent that why that's

14:12

why the 180 that they've done is so

14:15

jarring because it's unusual compared to

14:17

standard primary politics Marco Ruby is

14:20

say ah it's just it's a typical primary

14:22

no it's not we've never seen anything

14:24

like that in a Republican primary or a

14:26

Democratic primary no matter how much he

14:28

wants to pretend otherwise the fact of

14:29

the matter is Marco Rubio should Slither

14:31

back into the Shadows because he has no

14:34

Charisma he has no credibility nobody

14:36

takes him seriously anymore and again

14:37

visibly uncomfortable and pain the whole

14:40

time stammering through these answers he

14:42

knows that um he's debasing himself and

14:45

yet he does it anyway and that is the

14:47

dangerous power of Donald Trump and the

14:49

threat that this cult poses to the rest

14:51

of the country let me know what you

14:53

think in the comments