BREAKING🔥 Fani Willis DISQUALIFICATION Saga - Whistleblower Complaint🚨 FANI's Entire Teams Bad News

US Immigration
4 Apr 202430:49

Summary

TLDR该视频脚本详细描述了Fulton County地区检察官Fonnie Willis面临的争议和法律挑战。Willis被指控滥用联邦资金,并在她的办公室内部存在不当关系。视频提到了一名告密者和一名被解雇的员工,以及Willis与Nathan Wade的私人关系,后者在Willis的案件中担任主要检察官。同时,视频还涉及了Willis与国会的冲突,以及对她可能的不端行为的调查。整个事件引发了对Willis职业行为和法律道德的质疑。

Takeaways

  • 📢 经过两个多月的争议,Bonnie Willis的资格取消案可能即将有决定性进展,新音频显示有告密者私下警告Georgia DA Fonnie Willis,其高级助手滥用联邦资金。
  • 🎙️ 音频中Willis似乎同意告密者的说法,并表示会调查此事,但不久之后提出问题的工作人员被解雇。
  • 🤝 告密者指控Willis的助手在公共场合承诺将使用联邦资金购买MacBooks和其他物品,但告密者提出异议,认为这是不当使用。
  • 👩‍⚖️ Fulton County地方检察官Fonnie Willis面临众议院共和党人的最后期限,如果她不提供有关其办公室使用联邦资金的文件,将面临国会藐视的威胁。
  • 🏛️ 州议会正在调查是否存在滥用州资金和权力滥用的问题,而Fulton County法院则在决定Willis是否继续处理案件。
  • 💼 律师试图将Fon County DA从2020年乔治亚州选举案中移除,她在州参议院委员会前作证,谈论她认为应该取消Willis资格的原因。
  • 🚫 地方检察官办公室回应称,作为宪法官员,他们无需遵守县法规或州法规,可以自由支配预算。
  • 🤔 有人质疑Willis是否将联邦资金用于不当用途,特别是在与特朗普和其他公民的诉讼中。
  • 🔍 众议院司法委员会主席Jim Jordan要求Willis出示文件,以证明她的办公室没有滥用联邦资金,但Willis回应称她正在配合调查,并暗示Jordan试图拖延她的选举舞弊案件。
  • 📈 此案中,Willis和她的办公室被指控与白宫有不当协调,特别是在追求针对特朗普的诉讼中,国会希望了解Willis与白宫的具体互动和协调情况。
  • 📅 随着案件的推进,Willis面临的压力越来越大,她的行为和办公室的资金使用正受到越来越多的审查和质疑。

Q & A

  • Bonnie Willis案件的争议焦点是什么?

    -Bonnie Willis案件的争议焦点主要集中在她是否滥用联邦资金,以及她在聘用Nathan Wade为首席检察官的过程中是否存在不当行为,包括他们之间的私人关系是否影响了案件的公正性。

  • Whistleblower在这段音频中提出了哪些指控?

    -Whistleblower在音频中指控Nathan Wade计划使用联邦拨款用于与青年暴力和帮派预防项目无关的事项,如购买MacBooks和用于旅行的赠品,这违反了联邦拨款的特定用途。

  • Fonnie Willis在音频中对whistleblower的指控有何回应?

    -Fonnie Willis在音频中表示她同意whistleblower的观点,并表示会对此进行调查。然而,不久之后,提出问题的员工被解雇。

  • 众议院共和党人为何威胁要对Fonnie Willis进行蔑视国会的指控?

    -众议院共和党人威胁要对Fonnie Willis进行蔑视国会的指控,是因为她未能提供与她办公室使用联邦资金相关的文件,这引起了对资金使用不当的怀疑。

  • Nathan Wade的聘用条件和过程引起了哪些质疑?

    -Nathan Wade的聘用条件和过程引起了对其资质和与Fonnie Willis私人关系的质疑,特别是他们是否在聘用前就开始了恋爱关系,以及这是否影响了聘用决策和案件处理的公正性。

  • Fonnie Willis和Nathan Wade的旅行和花费引起了哪些关注?

    -Fonnie Willis和Nathan Wade的旅行和花费引起了关注,因为这些花费可能与他们的关系和公共资金的使用有关,特别是Wade声称这些花费是用于业务和个人开支,但没有提供任何银行存款单据来支持他的现金支付说法。

  • Fonnie Willis在法庭上的表现如何?

    -Fonnie Willis在法庭上的表现非常激进和对抗性,她对证人的提问和法庭程序的处理显示出她对案件的强烈情绪和个人投入,这可能影响了法庭对她的看法。

  • Fonnie Willis的办公室对Jim Jordan的传票有何回应?

    -Fonnie Willis的办公室对Jim Jordan的传票表示,他们正在合作,但暗示Jordan的真实意图是想要延缓她对特朗普等人的选举舞弊案件的审理。

  • Jim Jordan在信中提到了哪些关于联邦拨款的问题?

    -Jim Jordan在信中提到,Fonnie Willis的办公室被指控计划使用部分联邦拨款用于与青年暴力和帮派预防项目无关的费用,这违反了联邦拨款的特定用途。

  • Fonnie Willis的办公室如何处理公共资金?

    -Fonnie Willis的办公室声称,作为宪法官员,她不需要遵守县条例或州法规,可以自由支配预算。但这一立场受到了质疑,因为有证据显示她曾为其他55名员工请求额外预算。

  • Fonnie Willis面临的可能后果是什么?

    -如果Fonnie Willis被证明滥用联邦资金或在聘用Nathan Wade过程中存在不当行为,她可能会面临法律和职业上的严重后果,包括被取消资格和可能的法律责任。

Outlines

00:00

📜 邦妮·威利斯案的争议与决策

本段讨论了邦妮·威利斯案的争议和可能的决策。新音频显示,有告密者私下警告威利斯,她的高级助手滥用联邦资金。威利斯似乎同意告密者的说法,并表示会调查。然而,提出问题的工作人员不久后被解雇。此外,还涉及了富尔顿县地方检察官办公室使用联邦资金的情况,以及国会共和党人对威利斯的潜在藐视国会指控。

05:01

🔍 资金使用审查与法律争议

这段内容关注了对富尔顿县地方检察官办公室使用联邦和州资金的审查。讨论了是否有对特别检察官的额外资金请求,以及是否有滥用州资金和权力的情况。同时,还提到了对威利斯与白宫协调其针对特朗普的诉讼行动的调查。

10:03

🤝 政治操作与资金流向

本段内容涉及了对富尔顿县地方检察官办公室的政治操作和资金流向的调查。讨论了一名助理地方检察官同时是一个民主党政治活动家的双重角色,以及威利斯与特朗普支持者、众议员吉姆·乔丹之间的争议。乔丹要求威利斯提供关于联邦拨款使用情况的信息,否则将面临藐视国会的指控。

15:03

📰 法庭争端与媒体关注

这段内容描述了威利斯与吉姆·乔丹之间的法庭争端,以及媒体对此的关注。威利斯坚称自己是在合作,而乔丹则认为威利斯没有提供足够的证据来证明她没有滥用联邦资金。同时,还提到了威利斯与前男友的关系,以及这可能对她的案件产生的影响。

20:04

💸 现金交易与个人关系

本段内容聚焦于威利斯与她的前男友、主要检察官内森·韦德之间的现金交易和个人关系。讨论了威利斯是否用纳税人的钱帮助韦德,以及这些资金是否用于针对特朗普的诉讼。同时,还提到了威利斯在法庭上的辩护,以及她对现金交易的解释。

25:05

🏛️ 法律程序与道德问题

这段内容探讨了法律程序和道德问题,特别是在威利斯案中涉及的个人关系和资金使用。讨论了威利斯与韦德的关系,以及威利斯在法庭上的对抗态度。同时,还提到了对威利斯可能的不正当行为的指控,以及这些指控可能对她的案件和声誉产生的影响。

30:07

🤔 法律伦理与个人行为

本段内容关注了法律伦理和个人行为,特别是在威利斯案中涉及的现金支付和个人关系。讨论了韦德作为律师接受现金支付的合理性,以及威利斯在法庭上的辩护策略。同时,还提到了威利斯与韦德的关系,以及这可能对她的案件产生的影响。

Mindmap

Keywords

💡争议

争议指的是在视频脚本中提到的Bonnie Willis的资格取消案中存在的分歧和不同意见。这个关键词揭示了视频的核心议题,即围绕Willis的行为和决策的合法性和适当性展开的辩论。例如,脚本中提到了对她使用联邦资金的质疑,以及她与员工关系的争议。

💡资格取消

资格取消是指在法律或职业领域中,由于某些不当行为或违规行为,某人被剥夺继续担任其职位或参与某项活动的资格。在视频中,Bonnie Willis面临资格取消的威胁,因为她被指控滥用职权和联邦资金。

💡联邦资金

联邦资金是指由中央政府分配的资金,通常用于特定的项目或目的。在视频中,Bonnie Willis被指控滥用这些资金,这引起了对她财务管理和合规性的质疑。

💡举报人

举报人是指那些揭露非法或不当行为的人,通常是内部人士。在视频中,举报人提供了关于Willis办公室不当行为的信息,这些信息导致了对她的调查。

💡滥用职权

滥用职权是指公职人员利用其职位或权力进行不正当或非法的行为。在视频中,Willis被指控滥用她的职权,包括不当雇佣和使用联邦资金。

💡听证会

听证会是一个法律程序,其中相关各方有机会在法官或其他官员面前陈述证据和论点。在视频中,听证会是Willis回应对她的指控和质疑的场所。

💡国会传票

国会传票是国会发出的正式请求,要求个人或机构提供文件、证据或证词。在视频中,Willis被国会传唤,以调查她办公室对联邦资金的使用情况。

💡政治迫害

政治迫害是指利用政治权力对个人或团体进行不公正的对待或打压。在视频中,Willis被指控利用她的职位进行政治迫害,特别是针对前总统Donald Trump。

💡选举干预

选举干预是指非法或不公正地影响选举结果的行为。在视频中,Willis正在推动一起选举干预案件,该案件涉及对Trump和其他人的指控。

💡个人关系

个人关系指的是两个人之间的私人联系,这可能影响他们的专业行为和决策。在视频中,Willis被指控与她的一名下属有不当的个人关系,这可能影响了她的职业判断。

💡透明度

透明度是指信息的公开程度和可获取性,以便外部监督和评估。在视频中,Willis被要求提供关于她办公室使用联邦资金的透明度,以证明没有不当行为。

Highlights

Bonnie Willis案件在争议两个多月后,可能即将迎来决定性进展。

新音频显示,告密者私下警告Georgia DA Fonnie Willis,其高级助手滥用联邦资金。

Willis在音频中似乎同意告密者的说法,并表示会调查此事。

提出问题的员工在不到两周后被解雇。

Fulton County地方检察官办公室因使用联邦资金而面临审查。

众议院共和党人威胁要因Willis不提供与办公室使用联邦资金相关的文件而将其视为藐视国会。

试图将Fon County DA Fonny Willis从2020年乔治亚州选举案中移除的律师在州参议院委员会前作证。

州议会正在调查是否存在滥用州资金和权力滥用的情况。

Willis的办公室声称她是宪法官员,可以自由支配预算,无需县级批准。

Willis的办公室曾特别请求增加预算以聘请55名新员工,但后来却用于其他目的。

Willis与Nathan Wade的关系受到质疑,他们的关系开始于Willis聘用他之后不久。

Wade作为首席检察官的资质受到质疑,他曾与Willis一起度假并花费大量资金。

Willis在法庭上表现出对抗性,坚称她没有收到超过100美元的礼物。

Willis声称她以现金形式偿还Wade,但没有提供任何证据。

Willis的办公室被指控使用联邦资金进行政治迫害,特别是针对特朗普和其他公民。

Willis面临新的最后期限,联邦政府有权确保联邦资金没有被滥用。

众议院司法委员会主席Jim Jordan要求Willis就其办公室使用联邦资金的情况作出回应。

Willis的办公室声称她正在与Jordan的委员会合作,同时暗示Jordan试图阻止她对特朗普等人的选举舞弊案进行审判。

Willis的办公室被指控未能提供足够的文件证明其办公室没有滥用联邦资金。

Willis的办公室被指控使用联邦资金进行与青年暴力和帮派预防项目无关的开支。

Willis的办公室被指控未能遵守传票,可能导致藐视国会的程序。

Willis的办公室声称之前的诉讼中法院已经裁定这些指控没有依据。

Willis的办公室被指控与白宫协调,试图通过法律手段打击特朗普。

Transcripts

00:00

well tonight after more than two months

00:02

of controversy a decision may be on the

00:04

horizon in the Bonnie Willis

00:06

disqualification case you fire bombshell

00:09

new audio appears to show a

00:11

whistleblower privately warned in battle

00:13

Georgia da fonnie Willis that her top

00:16

Aid was abusing federal funds now we are

00:18

following the latest in the fton County

00:20

district attorney disqualification Saga

00:23

now in the audio Willis appears to agree

00:25

with this whistleblower and say that

00:27

she'd look into it yet a little less

00:29

than two later the staffer who raised

00:31

the concerns was fired let's take a

00:34

listen to that audio he told everybody

00:37

in front of Crystal Deonte everybody

00:40

we're going to get MacBooks we're going

00:42

to do we're going to get swag we're

00:43

going to use it for travel I said you

00:45

cannot do that it's a very very specific

00:47

Grant took me off I question Junior da

00:50

there's kids in there from out of the

00:52

the um the county all this took me off

00:55

Junior da I did not want to do it he

00:58

made it look as if I wasn't doing what I

01:00

needed to do because I questioned him

01:03

because I knew for a fact Mr cuy

01:06

respectfully did not know what he was

01:07

doing period so I respect that as your

01:11

assessment um it was clear to me that

01:14

you and Mr cuffy were not getting along

01:16

and I'm not saying that your assessment

01:17

is wrong I want you to really listen to

01:19

the words I'm saying cuy and this is my

01:22

personal opinion to one woman to another

01:25

is dangerous to your Administration Fon

01:27

County DA fonny Willis is facing a

01:30

looming deadline House Republicans in

01:32

Washington are threaten to hold her in

01:34

contempt of congress if she does not

01:36

produce documents relating to her

01:38

office's spending of federal funds well

01:40

this stems from a whistleblower

01:42

complaint alleging fonnie Willis misused

01:44

federal funds the lawyer at the center

01:46

of the attempt to remove Fon County DA

01:48

fonny Willis from the 2020 Georgia

01:51

election case testified before the state

01:53

senate committee she talked about what

01:56

exactly she says she found that she

01:59

believes should disqualify Willis well

02:01

Chris that's exactly what it does so to

02:03

be very clear what's happening here at

02:05

the State House is different from what

02:06

is happening a couple of locks away at

02:08

the Fulton County Courthouse in that

02:10

situation the judge will decide whether

02:11

or not fny Willis will stay on the case

02:14

now here at the State House what

02:16

lawmakers are doing is they are looking

02:17

into whether or not there was any misuse

02:20

of State funds and the misuse of power

02:22

for personal game those are the two

02:23

issues they're looking at here so you've

02:25

gone back and reviewed all of the Fulton

02:27

County commission's minutes in records

02:30

to see what requests were made and if

02:33

there was a resolution granting the

02:34

additional funding yes oh yes was there

02:37

ever a request for additional funding

02:39

for a special prosecutor to pursue these

02:42

election cases no there wasn't and I

02:45

knew that before um we got the District

02:47

Attorney's response but subsequently we

02:49

got a response from the district

02:50

attorney's office that said we didn't do

02:53

it we don't have to do it I'm a

02:54

constitutional officer um so their

02:56

argument was we don't have to comply

02:58

with those statutes or those rules

02:59

because she's saying um she's a

03:01

constitutional officer so she doesn't

03:02

have to get County approval she can

03:04

spend her budget however she wants then

03:06

why would she have gotten County

03:07

approval for the uh the other 55

03:10

attorneys so what I've surmised is that

03:13

was because those were staff members and

03:15

so she she C she went and asked for

03:17

additional budgetary money she needed a

03:19

higher budget so for those 55 people she

03:21

went and asked for more money because

03:23

she didn't have enough money and once

03:25

she was awarded that it's her position

03:27

now that she can spend that money

03:28

however she wants doesn't have to use

03:29

for 55 new staff she can use it for

03:32

special attorney general yes not

03:34

attorney

03:36

general essentially that that that is

03:38

their argument in their reply briefs

03:39

that they filed um in court that they

03:42

have her an authority they don't have to

03:43

comply with the county ordinances don't

03:45

have to comply with the statute um so

03:47

they don't have to comply with our state

03:49

statute that they have once they're

03:51

awarded the budget they can use that

03:52

budget however I mean how their how

03:54

their motion and I and I'm happy to send

03:56

the motion um it's public record but how

03:58

their motion argued it was if they get

04:01

$5 million they can pay that to one

04:03

person if they want um as long as the

04:05

you know because the voter's authorized

04:07

her to do that so the county their

04:09

position is the county authorizes a

04:10

budget and she can pretty much has

04:13

inherent authority to do it however even

04:15

though she specifically asked for the

04:17

money to prosecute backlogged homicide

04:19

cases in Atlanta yes okay um what's your

04:23

opinion on that you think the statute or

04:26

County procedures permit that no I do

04:29

not um and there's and I cited several

04:31

different County um County ordinances so

04:35

when I read the statute when I read 15-1

04:37

1820 and it makes sense you know it

04:39

makes sense intuitively as lawyers when

04:40

we Bill someone is reviewing our bills I

04:43

mean that that that's just you know

04:44

that's the process if you're in private

04:46

practice you know your client authorizes

04:48

your bills if you're in if you're doing

04:49

Public Defense which I've done Public

04:51

Defense I've done appointed work um you

04:53

know the the governing agency approves

04:55

my bills and they will cut them they

04:56

will regularly cut them um if they're

04:58

too high and so there's always some type

05:00

of budgetary authority that's that's

05:02

reviewing everything um so I thought it

05:04

was very strange that in this case there

05:06

isn't one um and that there's really no

05:08

oversight because it is public money so

05:10

I know that I know that it's an elected

05:13

official but it's still public money um

05:16

and I don't live in Fon County so it

05:18

would probably aggravate me more if I

05:23

did so we have the code section up that

05:25

you're referencing for prosecuting

05:27

attorneys getting additional personel

05:30

that's what Mr Wade would qualify as

05:32

correct yes so under B um that is the

05:36

that's the section that authorizes the

05:38

appointment of special counsel and it

05:40

says the manner and amount of

05:41

compensation to be paid is fixed by

05:43

either local act or by the district

05:45

attorney with the approval of the county

05:47

um and so that's where that that's our

05:49

argument that that this was not

05:52

appropriate expenditure because it did

05:54

not have County approval so our state

05:56

law requires if a DA is going to go seek

06:00

outside Council I'm going to call them

06:02

that must be approved by the County

06:04

Commission yes without a doubt good

06:06

evening carress woman and so what

06:09

provoked this request for documents to

06:11

begin with what made you think that her

06:13

office was using Federal front funds

06:16

inappropriately because we have evidence

06:18

that she has been receiving federal

06:20

funds and obviously we have oversight as

06:23

to how they're being spent being the

06:24

judici Judiciary Committee and Congress

06:28

and so it is our right determine whether

06:30

she is spending those funds

06:31

appropriately we have the same issue

06:33

with brag in New York they're using

06:35

federal funds to to engage in political

06:38

persecution and to go after political

06:40

enemies we also need to find out to what

06:42

extent she has uh corresponded with

06:45

worked with coordinated with the White

06:47

House in her efforts to to pursue this

06:51

uh this litigation against Donald Trump

06:53

and other citizens wait when you when

06:56

you send money to a DA's office now you

06:58

get sent around the country from the

07:00

Department of Justice I understand the

07:01

oversight is it just you know here's 12

07:03

million or here's 12 million spend it on

07:06

fixing the jails adding more assistant

07:09

Das I mean are you specific so I mean

07:11

because or or do you just sort of send a

07:13

check you don't you don't just send a

07:15

check they are supposed to use that

07:17

money for specific purposes and that's

07:19

one of the reasons why we have the

07:20

oversight it's just not just that they

07:22

get a blank check to do whatever they

07:24

want to do and again when we're talking

07:26

about political persecution which I

07:28

think it's very obvious in light of what

07:30

has happened over the last couple of

07:31

weeks and the the mini trial that we

07:34

that we watched play out in the court

07:35

down there addressing her relationship

07:38

her inappropriate relationship with one

07:40

of her underlings and whether that has

07:42

color colored this litigation and her

07:44

effort to prosecute Donald Trump so

07:46

again I think that we have every right

07:47

to determine whether our money is being

07:49

used inappropriately and whether she is

07:51

the conduit by which the White House is

07:54

attempting to hamstring uh President

07:56

Biden's primary political opponent are

07:59

there some specific documents you've

08:01

requested that she has not provided to

08:03

date I know that she says it's sort of a

08:05

rolling process and um I don't know if

08:07

she's dragging her feet or not but

08:08

nonetheless are there some specific

08:10

documents that you want that you think

08:12

that she's sitting on deliberately well

08:14

some of the documents that I would like

08:16

to see relate to the relationship and

08:18

the coordination and the interaction

08:20

with the White House when her uh former

08:23

Paramore uh was billing the county he

08:26

has line items in there for meeting with

08:29

white with the White House in Washington

08:31

DC for eight hours at a time I think it

08:34

would be entirely appropriate for us to

08:36

have some understanding of what what

08:39

what took place it during those meetings

08:42

and again we need to get back to the

08:43

fact or to the question of whether Joe

08:46

Biden and the White House are

08:47

coordinating in these efforts to

08:49

prosecute Donald Trump Donald Trump is

08:51

clearly not only the front runner he is

08:53

the candidate for the Republican Party

08:55

he is beating Joe Biden in all of the

08:58

polls there's one particular entry that

09:00

I have a high interest in and I I can't

09:02

figure this one out I know about the

09:03

meetings at the White House and and I

09:05

got that you have the interest in but

09:07

there's one entry in his invoices where

09:09

he said he met I think with White House

09:11

councel in Athens Georgia and for the

09:13

life of me I can't figure out I mean I

09:15

get you know going to the White House

09:17

and maybe there's some negotiation about

09:18

documents or whatever and I I I await

09:21

the answer to that but why why do you

09:23

think that what's with this Athens

09:25

Georgia meeting with the White House

09:26

Council you don't expect that one so

09:29

think that that's also very significant

09:31

we need to find out that but we also

09:32

have learned that there is an assistant

09:34

district attorney in her office who is

09:36

being paid 40 some thousand 50 some

09:39

thousand a year yet has a side business

09:42

that is he is a a a political operative

09:45

a Democrat political operative where

09:47

he's actually red in hundreds of

09:48

thousands of dollars if not more in

09:50

furthering the Democrat agenda I think

09:53

we're entitled to find out more

09:54

information about that relationship and

09:56

why he's in the office and as as you say

09:59

there were meetings with white house

10:00

councel I think we have the right to

10:02

understand what took place during those

10:04

meetings We are following a dispute

10:07

right now between Fulton County Georgia

10:09

essentially Atlanta the da here funny

10:11

Willis and her dispute with a powerful

10:13

Congressman house should diser chairman

10:16

Jim Jordan of Ohio an ardan Trump

10:18

supporter recently threatened to hold

10:20

Willis in contempt of congress for not

10:23

providing information about how the DA's

10:26

office used a Federal grant but in a def

10:29

defiant response Willis said she is

10:31

cooperating with Jordan's committee and

10:33

suggested what Jordan really wants is to

10:35

slow down her election subversion case

10:38

against Trump and others she wrote in

10:40

part nothing that you do will derail the

10:43

efforts of my staff and I bring the

10:45

election interference prosecution to

10:47

trial the Georgia case delayed for two

10:49

months by a challenge to Da fonny Willis

10:52

finally moves forward today in Atlanta

10:54

Judge Scott McAfee will hear arguments

10:56

that the charges violate Trump's Free

10:58

Speech rights under the First Amendment

11:00

Trump's lawyers say the case seeks to

11:01

criminalize political speech da Fon

11:03

Willis firing back at Republicans

11:06

seeking info about her use of federal

11:08

funds saying quote nothing you do will

11:11

derail the efforts of my staff and I to

11:13

bring election interference prosecution

11:15

to trial so that a jury of fton County

11:18

Citizens can determine the guilt or

11:21

innocence of the defendants tensions

11:23

escalating on Capitol Hill as

11:25

Congressman Jim Jordan calls on fonnie

11:27

Willis to appear before lawmakers

11:29

The embattled Fulton County district

11:31

attorney facing an ultimatum show up or

11:35

face contempt of congress if she doesn't

11:37

comply with the Congressional subpoena

11:39

Congress is trying to find out if and

11:41

how her office misused federal funds so

11:44

F Willis's office is saying that she's

11:46

innocent their office did nothing wrong

11:48

but Congressman Jim Jordan is saying

11:50

they haven't sent over enough to prove

11:53

that they're looking for yet another

11:54

slice of the pie so in a letter from we

11:57

obtains from Jim Jordan to Fanny will

11:59

his office it reads in part quote your

12:02

office unlawfully planed to use part of

12:04

a

12:06

$488,000 Federal grant earmarked for the

12:08

creation of a center of Youth

12:10

Empowerment and gang prevention to cover

12:13

frivolous unrelated expenses we know the

12:16

allegations here Center on a former

12:18

employee who said the district attorney

12:20

fired her soon after she raised concerns

12:23

about how one of their employees hoped

12:25

to use those Federal grant money for

12:28

things outside

12:29

of the scope of that Federal grant the

12:32

youth violence and gang prevention

12:34

program the congressman Jim Jordan he's

12:36

emphasizing the seriousness of the

12:38

matter he's saying that failure to

12:40

adhere to The subpoena would result in

12:42

severe

12:44

consequences as part of that letter he

12:46

says quote the committee expects that

12:49

you will produce all responsive

12:51

Documents To The subpoena and the

12:53

categories prioritized by the committee

12:55

if you fail to do so the committee will

12:57

consider taking further action such as

13:00

the invocation of contempt of congress

13:03

proceedings and that's what's really new

13:05

in this story here so we've reached out

13:06

to Willis's office in response for this

13:09

subpoena we have not heard back from her

13:11

yet we'll update you when we do but when

13:13

this subpoena was initially sent out

13:16

back in February February 2nd she sent

13:18

us this this statement she says in part

13:21

quote these false allegations are

13:23

included in baseless litigation filed by

13:25

a holdover employee from the previous

13:28

administration who was terminated for

13:30

cause the courts have ruled they found

13:33

no merit in these claims we expect the

13:35

same result in any pending litigation

13:38

Mary right now it's still unclear

13:40

whether or not these federal funds in

13:42

question were used or misused improperly

13:46

or not let's talk about this Georgia

13:48

case and we know this Fanny Willis looks

13:49

unbelievably compromised it looks like

13:51

she's admitted her relationships with

13:53

Nathan Wade who whose credentials are

13:55

weak to be a lead prosecutor on a former

13:58

president United States Ates they're

13:59

going to be questioning today lot of his

14:01

expenses that he was paid and were they

14:04

used to go on vacation together look at

14:06

some of these stuff you probably can't

14:07

see it there $800 for nappy Valley Nappa

14:10

Valley Hotel 3,000 for a Royal Caribbean

14:13

vacation close to that no Norwegian crws

14:16

on and on and on one flowers all these

14:19

bills are they related to the money he's

14:21

getting because of the job she gave them

14:23

and what does it mean for the case yeah

14:25

she used taxpayer dollars to to help

14:28

Nathan Wade who spent it in all kinds of

14:30

ways but he also used that money to go

14:32

after president Trump for goodness sake

14:34

so yeah that I think she's compromised

14:36

and back up a second she charged

14:38

president Trump and 18 other people and

14:40

was looking to charge three United

14:42

States senators she put this out

14:43

including the top Republican on the

14:45

Senate Judiciary Committee and now we

14:47

find out we're talking to this

14:48

individual now we find out there's a

14:50

whistleblower in the fton County DA's

14:52

office who says that fonny Willis also

14:55

misspent federal funds that's why we've

14:57

subpoena Miss Willis for information

14:59

related to that and other issues we want

15:01

to know what's going on here but she

15:03

sure looks like she's been compromising

15:05

this entire ridiculous effort that she

15:07

undertook several months ago I just hope

15:09

they blow up the case because she has no

15:11

credibility and she led the charge and

15:13

it seems to be all about politics fton

15:15

County district attorney fonnie Willis

15:17

is facing a new deadline in the ongoing

15:20

investigation into her office's use of

15:22

federal funds the federal government has

15:24

a right to ensure that federal dollars

15:26

aren't being misspent or misappropriated

15:28

and that's either for personal use or

15:29

even divert it into another program US

15:32

House Judiciary chair representative Jim

15:35

Jordan issued this letter Thursday

15:37

saying Willis's compliance with a

15:39

previous subpoena was deficient to

15:41

produce documents proving her office did

15:44

not mishandle Federal money for example

15:47

the money was given to prosecute uh drug

15:49

crimes that it's not being used to

15:51

prosecute uh even homicides for example

15:54

that' be a misuse of the federal funding

15:56

Willis's office was originally

15:57

subpoenaed for the documents in February

16:00

after House Republicans began

16:01

investigating if Willis used federal

16:04

funds during her investigation into

16:06

former president Donald Trump

16:08

practically

16:09

disruptive um because you know if if he

16:12

follows through on the threat and if

16:13

there is a contempt there's going to be

16:14

a hearing the allegations were made by a

16:16

former employee in Willis's office in

16:19

the past Willis has called the

16:20

allegations false and said quote the

16:23

courts have ruled found no merit to

16:25

these claims lawyers get involved um po

16:28

potentially even the Department of

16:29

Justice gets involved and so it would be

16:31

a distraction and it could be disruptive

16:35

ultimately in the letter sent to

16:37

district attorney Willis representative

16:38

Jordan says the allegations are

16:40

concerning and the committee has an

16:42

obligation to investigate these claims

16:44

if she was asked the question you know

16:46

did you keep cash and trying to assess

16:48

the real issue here is whether or not

16:50

there are misconduct allegations that

16:52

can lead to her being disqualified those

16:55

misconduct allegations include number

16:57

one did she have an affair with a guy

17:00

before she hired him and what has come

17:02

out is that she hired him in November of

17:05

2022 and the affair started in early

17:08

2023 so I guess a few weeks after they

17:10

took a look at each other they decided

17:12

they were going to have sex together but

17:15

the truth is that it's more than that

17:18

was she partaking of trips that

17:21

literally she was indirectly paying for

17:25

and when it got to the point where she

17:26

had to prove that she was in fact

17:29

reimbursing uh Mr Wade for these trips

17:32

she couldn't have any proof she didn't

17:34

have any she said she want to believe

17:37

with cash I mean who to B with cash and

17:40

then finally um she said that she never

17:43

received a gift with of aggregate of

17:45

over $100 what she's got to worry about

17:48

is not so much her reputation because

17:50

she's outraged she's got to worry about

17:52

the reputation of her office that DA's

17:55

office has a stink on it now did she

17:58

hire someone

17:59

that she brought in because she wanted

18:01

to have a relationship with him did she

18:04

spend and by the way how do you go on

18:06

five trips as a DA in six months I mean

18:09

from Biz to the Bahamas to Aruba to uh

18:14

Miami at the Napa Valley I mean who's

18:16

running the DA's office nobody has time

18:19

to do this she was out of control but

18:22

the in the in the end I think she

18:24

started understanding that it wasn't her

18:26

show she had to calm herself so went on

18:29

for hours and this is one key part if if

18:31

control room can you get intro number

18:33

four ready and I'll ask Jesse about this

18:35

because there's been a lot of qu if you

18:37

turned in late tuned in late there was

18:39

all these questions about money and cash

18:42

and how much she paid and she says she

18:44

paid her fair share Etc but this was a

18:46

moment today where you thought oh there

18:48

could be trouble watch I've given them

18:50

cash only a few times in life probably

18:53

four okay probably the most money I've

18:55

ever handed him is $2,500 you have no

18:58

proof of reimbursement for any of these

19:00

things because it was all cash right the

19:01

testimony of one witness is enough to

19:04

prove a fact the only money you've ever

19:06

given him outside of a contract is cash

19:09

I didn't give him money in a contract so

19:11

that was cute but I didn't give him

19:13

money out in a contract his money back I

19:16

don't need anybody to foot my bills the

19:18

only man who's ever foot my bills

19:20

completely is my daddy you've been

19:23

watching all day you love it I don't

19:25

even know where to start Dana I'm so

19:28

engaged in this courtroom drama so many

19:31

things I want to say at once I just I

19:33

don't know if we're going to have enough

19:34

time we are covering this for the whole

19:35

hour is that correct I I I don't know if

19:37

I we please cover this for the whole

19:39

hour just start first of all it must be

19:42

exhausting to prosecute Trump because

19:45

This Woman's taken seven vacations

19:48

Year my favorite part was when she was

19:51

asked if she's ever been to any other

19:54

continents with Wade and she said well

19:56

I've been to bise is what is

20:00

bise B is North America Central

20:04

America this woman is Prosecuting the

20:06

former president of the United States

20:09

she flies to a country and doesn't know

20:11

what continent it's on that's just

20:13

number

20:15

one these are not smart or professional

20:18

people these are Petty people that all

20:22

of a sudden everyone's looking at and

20:25

their dirty laundry is totally exposed

20:30

her friend Dana for 30 years sorority

20:34

sisters she moved into this woman's

20:37

condo she hired her to work in her

20:38

office her friend

20:41

testified that she saw her kissing and

20:44

cuddling and holding hands just right

20:47

there alone direct witness

20:50

testimony should sink her because you're

20:52

not allowed to hire the person you're

20:55

having sex with and then not disclose it

21:00

and then pay him a bunch of money and

21:03

then he takes you on vacation and you

21:05

claim you gave him cash she says she's

21:08

keeping lots of cash in her house would

21:12

the top law enforcement official in

21:15

Fulton County announced to the entire

21:17

world hey everybody in Atlanta I keep

21:21

lots of cash in my

21:23

apartment it's it doesn't even add up

21:26

Dana and then when they say well where'

21:29

you get the cash from she goes Blood

21:32

Sweat and Tears hard work well do you

21:35

have any withdrawal slips from the bank

21:39

no she's been accumulating a cash horde

21:41

for many years she thought the guy said

21:44

yes she that was one of my

21:45

favorite parts I mean I could go on for

21:47

hours and hours and he said I would

21:49

never say about this case so much to say

21:52

can I asked the call uh control room for

21:54

call for number one this is the

21:56

friend revealing the

21:59

relationship you're confused you think

22:01

I'm on trial these people are on trial

22:04

for trying to steal an election in 2020

22:06

I'm not on trial no matter how hard you

22:08

try to put me on trial it is a liot it

22:11

is a

22:12

liot Mr SE thank you we're going to take

22:14

5 minutes all right that wasn't the one

22:16

I wanted but you get the picture of how

22:18

it went Greg yeah I think the view found

22:21

a backup host I mean the amount of

22:23

nonsense she can unload matches all of

22:26

them combined I'm like the judge I

22:28

didn't know know you could be this

22:29

combative and belligerent I mean that's

22:31

okay I guess I mean do does the average

22:34

guy get the same uh leeway to do that I

22:37

mean why are they so hands off I'd

22:39

really like to know it I'm telling you

22:42

man that was it was exhausting I felt

22:46

like I was on I was trapped with a

22:50

combative customer service rep from a

22:52

rental car agency who is battling me on

22:55

everything like I said that I wanted a i

22:58

wanted a four-door no we're out of did

23:00

you say that no we only have two doors

23:03

but I I I'm pretty sure I said

23:05

convertible we don't have any

23:06

convertibles are you saying I'm lying it

23:08

I I just she was amazing she was trying

23:11

to flood the Zone with a barrage of

23:14

frantic words a sides and tangents it

23:17

was like listening to a shoplifter tell

23:19

a cop her life story when he's just

23:21

asking her did you put a Snickers bar in

23:24

your purse I mean I I I I guess she's

23:26

like hoping that people will forget what

23:30

the case is about as long as you keep

23:32

building and building this nonsense

23:34

instead of digging a bigger hole You Dig

23:36

a bunch of little holes over here and

23:37

hope people just fall in and it just got

23:39

after a while I I couldn't handle it I

23:41

mean it is weird though that this person

23:44

is a DA and not just a DA but you know

23:47

presiding over probably one of the

23:48

biggest trials you know it's it's a

23:52

president on trial and and that's the

23:54

person in charge and I mean that is not

23:57

that's

23:58

not an even killed person uh I I I think

24:02

that I I originally would think that she

24:05

was you know maybe she felt like the

24:06

jury would identify with her but there's

24:08

no jury right so all I can think of is

24:11

she's auditioning for the view she knows

24:15

she's going to be impeached or whatever

24:17

you call it and this is like her next

24:19

gig because man she doesn't need a

24:21

script she just go I want to ask you to

24:23

do call forat number two that's on the

24:25

second part of the page this is the

24:27

MSNBC saying that she's in a lot of

24:30

trouble

24:32

watch this is epic this is Monumental if

24:35

things are going in the direction we

24:37

think uh fonnie Willis lied to the court

24:40

it's game over for her she will be

24:43

disqualified not to watch a Bravo

24:45

housewives episode or about salacious

24:47

details about a romance so I don't think

24:50

this is a good day for the state which

24:53

means Jessica it's a good day for

24:55

president Trump yeah and this this case

24:58

we'll get to the judge on this in a

24:59

moment but it looks like it's not going

25:00

well for Vonnie Willis or and you got to

25:03

imagine all of those other defendants

25:04

are thinking this case could get thrown

25:06

out I'm not sure I'll let the judge

25:09

comment on whether this could end up in

25:10

it being thrown out the Trump team and

25:13

what they are happy about is it it would

25:15

mean if she was disqualified it's

25:16

another delay all he's trying to do is

25:18

delay everything and he was in court in

25:20

New York today right trying to get the

25:22

Alvin Brad case delayed and that seems

25:23

like it'll go forward on March 25th the

25:25

thing is nobody cares about the Alvin

25:27

Brad case what they do care care about

25:29

is this case and the election

25:30

interference case that Jack Smith is

25:31

bringing and the documents so um I agree

25:35

with what with much of what has been

25:37

said I think that there were some

25:39

moments where she had legitimate reason

25:41

to be upset um when she was holding up

25:43

the document saying you lied in here the

25:46

lawyer had lied and put in the

25:48

documentation that uh Nathan Wade had

25:51

spent time in her condo in South Fulton

25:52

in 2021 said that's not true and that

25:55

that's where the disagreement with the

25:57

friend is their relationship hadn't

25:58

started until it doesn't mean it's a lie

26:01

the finder of facts determines whether

26:03

that's a lie she doesn't determine

26:06

it okay she was refuting testimony that

26:09

had come from her former friend

26:11

obviously something very bad happened in

26:12

that falling out and from that

26:15

particular yeah and in fact Willis at

26:17

one point says I have not spoken to

26:18

Robin in over a year I certainly do not

26:21

consider her a friend now judge can I

26:24

have you listen to what is a friend I

26:25

mean is it a personal friend is it a ro

26:28

that's right R have I ever paid you cash

26:31

think about that okay I just want I just

26:34

want to get to this part because it's

26:35

about democracy right so this is Will is

26:38

talking about democracy listen hear call

26:39

for number

26:41

four I'm very much want to be here so

26:44

I'm not a hostile witness I very much

26:46

want to be not so much that you're

26:47

hostile Miss will it be an adverse

26:49

witness your interests are opposed to

26:50

miss

26:51

Merchants Merchant's entrance are P are

26:55

cont contrary to democracy your honor

26:57

not to mine

26:59

okay mhm if that isn't a political

27:02

answer and first of all it appears she

27:04

doesn't understand the difference

27:06

between a hostile and an adverse witness

27:08

she is a hostile witness the way she

27:10

approached that that chair I've never

27:12

seen anything like it but more than that

27:14

she is an adverse witness legally which

27:17

allows cross-examination of her based

27:20

upon the fact that her interests are

27:22

contrary to miss Marchin Miss Marin's

27:24

papers included affidavits from

27:27

individual who swore to tell the truth

27:30

so an affidavit is something where if

27:32

you don't say the truth you can be

27:34

punished for it so she comes out as

27:36

though again she's running the courtroom

27:38

that's a lie no you refute it you say

27:41

it's a lie but that's not up to you and

27:44

she says I'm not hostile you're number

27:46

one as hostile as you can get body

27:48

language wise and number two you are as

27:51

adverse as any witness in a criminal

27:53

courtroom and when she says I'm not

27:55

hostile or she says that's an inaccurate

27:58

wa for you to ask me a question since

28:00

when are you the judge and that the

28:02

judge let her get away with this I've

28:04

lost respect I want to give Jesse one

28:06

more chance but can you get can you have

28:07

Jesse respond to call for number three

28:09

you haven't seen testimony yet during

28:11

this Roundup from Nathan Wade himself

28:13

this is about the

28:15

ATM you don't have a single solitary

28:19

deposit slip to corroborate or support

28:22

any of your allegations that you were

28:24

paid by Mrs Willis in cash do you

28:28

no sir not a single solitary one not a

28:32

one not a

28:34

one well I mean if you're paid in cash

28:37

you spend the cash Dana but someone's

28:39

got to have a withdrawal slip and it's

28:41

only Fanny but remember you can't ask

28:45

her those questions she's had that

28:47

hoorde for at least 10 years I want to

28:50

talk about Nathan Wade may I Nathan Wade

28:53

said it's not unusual for clients to

28:55

come to his law firm and pay large sums

29:00

of cash Bravo what kind of Law Firm

29:03

accepts large sums of cash from clients

29:07

that kind of guy is Prosecuting the

29:10

president of the United States a

29:12

personal injury attorney that takes cash

29:14

payments no questions asked are you

29:16

kidding me also how about this this is

29:19

how Wade does business Wade puts

29:22

everything he spends his money on on his

29:26

corporate card yes yes then at the end

29:29

of the year he gives the statement to

29:32

his tax attorney and the tax attorney

29:35

divides what was business and what was

29:37

personal and then they filed their taxes

29:41

I have never ever heard of anybody doing

29:44

that at all also funny from Wade Wade at

29:48

this point he's not supposed to be

29:50

sleeping with Fanny he's going to her

29:54

condo and this is when she's very lonely

29:58

and he's just picking her up and they're

29:59

going to dinner at Lickety splits or

30:02

Mellow Mushroom or Mellow Mushroom or

30:04

sometimes he's going to her condo and

30:06

they're reviewing documents has anybody

30:09

else from the legal team gone to F's

30:11

condo to review documents absolutely not

30:14

this would be like I don't know Robert

30:18

Mueller appointing Andrew Weissman to

30:20

work on his team they're

30:23

screwing and then he hands weissan $40

30:27

million which they're supposed to

30:29

investigate Donald Trump with and

30:30

Weissman takes Mueller to B to Nappa and

30:35

to Aruba and when everybody asks

30:38

questions meller says oh I just paid him

30:40

back in cash because I keep large stacks

30:43

of cash in the house and I'm not going

30:44

to show you my withdrawal

30:46

slips this doesn't add up