Apple Is In Serious Trouble...

SomeOrdinaryGamers
25 Mar 202418:28

Summary

TLDR视频讨论了美国政府对苹果公司提起的反垄断诉讼案,指出苹果通过其封闭的生态系统限制了市场竞争,特别是在应用商店和iMessage服务方面。提到了欧盟的数字市场法案对苹果施加压力,要求其开放服务和数据访问,以及苹果在消息传递质量上对非iPhone用户的负面影响。视频倡导苹果应更新其技术标准,以提供更好的跨平台用户体验。

Takeaways

  • 📱 视频讨论了从iPhone切换到Android的经历,并指出Android提供更多自由和选择。
  • 🚀 讨论了美国政府对苹果提起的反垄断诉讼,强调反垄断法的重要性,以保持市场的公平竞争。
  • 📈 引用了ftc.gov上关于谢尔曼法案的解释,该法案旨在维护自由和无拘无束的贸易竞争。
  • 💻 回顾了历史上的反垄断案例,如美国对微软的诉讼,说明了大型科技公司可能面临的法律挑战。
  • 🌿 讨论了苹果的“围墙花园”策略,即通过控制软件和服务来锁定用户在其生态系统内。
  • 📱 指出苹果的iMessage服务在iPhone用户之间提供更好的消息体验,但对Android用户则不然。
  • 📱 强调了欧盟数字市场法案(DMA)对苹果作为“守门人”的监管,要求其允许第三方服务在其平台上互操作。
  • 🌐 讨论了苹果拒绝更新其消息服务以支持RCS(富通信服务),这影响了Android和iOS用户之间的消息体验。
  • 📉 诉讼中提到苹果的行为可能会阻碍新技术的发展,如云服务和流媒体游戏,这些技术可能会提高智能手机的竞争。
  • 💬 强调了苹果通过降低非iPhone用户的消息体验质量,间接地提高了iPhone的市场份额。
  • 🔄 讨论了政府介入的必要性,以确保技术发展和市场竞争,同时为用户提供更多的选择和更好的体验。

Q & A

  • 为什么演讲者从iPhone切换到Android设备?

    -演讲者认为iPhone和苹果产品虽然很酷,但是过于限制性。他觉得Android设备更有趣,比如可折叠设备等,并且Android设备可以让用户访问到更多的应用,不像苹果设备那样受限。

  • 什么是反垄断法(Antitrust laws)?

    -反垄断法,也称为谢尔曼法案,是旨在维护自由和无拘无束竞争的经济自由的全面宪章。它禁止所有限制贸易的合同、组合或阴谋,以及任何垄断、企图垄断或共谋垄断的行为。最高法院早已裁定,谢尔曼法案并不禁止所有贸易限制,只禁止那些不合理的限制。

  • 美国政府为何要起诉苹果公司?

    -美国政府起诉苹果公司的原因在于,苹果公司作为市场上的主要参与者,其商业行为可能违反了反垄断法规。政府希望通过法律手段确保大型科技公司不会形成垄断,保持市场的公平竞争。

  • 苹果的“围墙花园”策略是什么?

    -“围墙花园”是指苹果公司通过其产品和服务创建的一个封闭生态系统。苹果用户通常只能在苹果的App Store中安装应用程序,这限制了用户的选择,并使得用户更倾向于购买苹果的其他产品,如iPad或Macbook。

  • 什么是“蓝色气泡”和“绿色气泡”争议?

    -“蓝色气泡”和“绿色气泡”争议指的是iPhone用户和Android用户在使用消息应用时的不同体验。iPhone用户之间通过iMessage发送的消息显示为蓝色气泡,而Android用户或者与Android用户通信时则显示为绿色气泡,后者的功能和体验相对较差。

  • 为什么说苹果公司的消息策略对社会有负面影响?

    -苹果公司的消息策略通过降低与非iPhone用户通信的体验质量,间接地使得非iPhone用户感受到社会压力和排斥,这可能导致用户因为想要更好的通信体验而被迫选择iPhone,从而加强了苹果的市场主导地位。

  • 美国政府在诉讼中提到了哪些可能被苹果公司压制的技术?

    -美国政府在诉讼中提到了超级应用、云流媒体游戏应用、跨平台消息应用等技术,这些技术能够提高智能手机之间的竞争,但苹果公司通过限制这些技术的使用,影响了市场竞争和技术的发展。

  • 什么是RCS(富通信服务)?

    -RCS(Rich Communication Services,富通信服务)是一种通信标准,旨在改善传统的短信体验,提供类似于iMessage的功能,如高清图片和视频分享、群聊、消息状态指示等。RCS是行业标准,已被许多Android设备采用。

  • 为什么演讲者认为苹果公司应该更新其消息服务?

    -演讲者认为苹果公司应该更新其消息服务,以采用RCS等行业标准,这样可以使所有用户无论使用何种操作系统都能获得更好的通信体验。这不仅有利于用户,也有助于促进市场的公平竞争和技术的进步。

  • 演讲者对于苹果公司目前的法律挑战有何看法?

    -演讲者支持美国政府对苹果公司的法律挑战,认为政府的论点合理,有助于打破苹果的市场垄断地位,推动技术创新和市场竞争。演讲者还指出,苹果不仅面临美国的法律挑战,还面临中国和欧盟等其他地区的类似压力。

  • 演讲者对于苹果公司的“围墙花园”策略有何建议?

    -演讲者建议苹果公司应该开放其生态系统,允许第三方应用和服务在苹果设备上更好地运行和交互。这样不仅可以提升用户体验,还能促进市场竞争和技术的发展。

Outlines

00:00

📱 从iPhone到Android的转变

该段落讲述了演讲者从使用iPhone转向Android设备的经历,并分享了他对这两种操作系统的看法。演讲者认为,尽管苹果产品很酷,但相对而言有些限制性。他赞赏Android设备的多样性和功能,如可折叠设备,并提到了美国政府对苹果提起的反垄断诉讼案。演讲者解释了反垄断法的重要性,举例说明了微软历史上的反垄断案件,并强调这些法律的目的是防止大型科技公司形成垄断,保持市场的公平竞争。

05:02

💬 蓝色气泡与绿色气泡的争议

这一部分讨论了iMessage服务和它所代表的蓝色气泡与Android用户使用的绿色气泡之间的区别。演讲者解释了iMessage如何为iPhone用户提供更高质量的通信体验,包括更好的多媒体传输和加密标准。相反,当iPhone用户与Android用户通信时,由于苹果不采用现代的通讯协议如RCS,会导致通信体验下降,如媒体质量降低、缺乏加密和不安全的通信。演讲者批评了苹果在这方面的不作为,并提到政府正在介入,要求苹果改进其服务。

10:05

📱 苹果的封闭生态与市场竞争

在这一段中,演讲者讨论了苹果如何通过其所谓的'围墙花园'策略来保持用户在其生态系统内。这包括限制用户只能通过App Store安装应用程序,与Android用户的自由选择形成对比。演讲者提到了欧盟的数字市场法案(DMA),该法案要求苹果等大型平台允许第三方服务在其平台上互操作,并允许用户访问和控制他们的数据。演讲者认为,这些法律和政策有助于促进市场竞争,提供更多选择,并改善用户体验。

15:05

🤔 苹果面临的法律挑战

演讲者在这一段中详细讨论了苹果公司面临的法律挑战,特别是美国政府对其提起的诉讼。诉讼中提到,苹果的行为可能会扼杀新的市场范式,如云计算和跨平台的应用程序,这些都有可能削弱苹果在智能手机市场的主导地位。演讲者还提到了苹果如何通过限制第三方应用程序和消息服务的质量来维持其市场地位,包括绿色气泡在通信中所传达的低质量信号。演讲者强调,这些行为不仅对非苹果用户有害,也损害了苹果用户的利益,因为他们被剥夺了更好的产品和服务的选择。

🚀 呼吁苹果开放其生态系统

最后一段中,演讲者呼吁苹果开放其生态系统,允许使用如RCS这样的行业标准通信服务,以改善所有用户的消息体验。他指出,苹果在某些地区已经开始被迫这样做,但不是因为公司自愿,而是因为法律的要求。演讲者表示支持政府介入,迫使苹果改变其政策,以便用户可以享受到更好的服务和产品选择。他还提到了谷歌一直在推动苹果改进其服务,并鼓励苹果用户支持这些改进,以获得更好的通信体验。

Mindmap

Keywords

💡iPhone

iPhone是苹果公司开发的一款智能手机,以其独特的iOS操作系统、优质的硬件设计和强大的生态系统而闻名。在视频中,iPhone代表了苹果公司的产品线和封闭的生态系统,用户在使用iPhone时只能通过苹果的App Store安装应用,这成为了视频中讨论的主要焦点之一。

💡Android

Android是一个基于Linux内核的开源操作系统,主要用于触屏移动设备如智能手机和平板电脑。与iPhone相对,Android系统以其开放性、可定制性和广泛的应用兼容性而受到用户青睐。

💡Antitrust

反垄断法是一系列旨在维护市场竞争和防止市场垄断的法律和法规。这些法律禁止限制贸易的协议、垄断行为和企图垄断市场的共谋。

💡Walled Garden

围墙花园(Walled Garden)是一个比喻,用来形容一个封闭的、受控的环境,用户只能在这个环境中获取有限的资源和服务。在视频中,这个概念被用来描述苹果公司如何通过其产品和服务创建一个封闭的生态系统,限制用户只能使用苹果公司提供的应用和服务。

💡iMessage

iMessage是苹果公司开发的一款即时通讯服务,仅限于苹果设备用户之间使用。它提供了文本消息、视频通话和文件共享等功能,并且支持端到端加密。

💡Digital Markets Act

数字市场法案(Digital Markets Act)是欧盟制定的一项法律,旨在规范数字市场,特别是大型在线平台的行为,确保市场公平竞争,防止数字守门人滥用市场支配地位。

💡Cloud Computing

云计算是一种通过互联网提供计算资源(如服务器、存储、数据库、网络、软件、分析等)的技术。它允许用户按需访问这些资源,而无需自己建立和维护物理基础设施。

💡Super Apps

超级应用(Super Apps)是指集成多种功能和服务于一体的应用程序,它们为用户提供了一个统一的平台,以满足多种需求。

💡RCS

RCS(Rich Communication Services,富通信服务)是一种通信协议,旨在提升传统短信服务的功能,使其具有类似iMessage的即时通讯服务的特点,如群聊、读回执、媒体共享等。

💡Gatekeeper

守门人(Gatekeeper)在视频中指的是控制市场入口和用户访问的平台或公司,它们通过控制用户可以访问的应用和服务来维持市场主导地位。

💡Social Pressure

社会压力是指来自周围人或社会环境的影响和期望,这些压力可能会迫使个人遵循特定的行为模式或做出某些选择。

Highlights

个人从iPhone用户转变为Android用户的经历分享

对苹果产品生态系统的封闭性提出批评

美国政府对苹果提起反垄断诉讼的介绍

反垄断法(谢尔曼法)的基本解释

历史上的反垄断案例,如美国诉微软案

苹果的“围墙花园”策略及其对用户的影响

欧盟数字市场法案对苹果作为守门人角色的指控

蓝色气泡与绿色气泡争议的背后含义

政府介入迫使苹果更新其通讯服务的讨论

苹果通过降低非苹果用户消息体验来维持其市场优势的指控

诉讼中提到的苹果利用机制压制技术竞争的五个例子

苹果的iMessage服务对跨平台通讯体验的限制

苹果被要求支持的富通信服务(RCS)及其对行业标准的影响

苹果在全球范围内面临的法律挑战

对苹果是否应该开放其生态系统的公众意见分歧

苹果的iOS与Android在用户体验和安全性方面的比较

苹果在全球法律压力下可能做出的改变

对苹果诉讼案的个人看法和公众反应的期待

Transcripts

00:00

hello guys and gals me mudahar I used to

00:02

be a blue bubble iPhone user until I

00:05

switched to ladies and gentlemen a green

00:08

bubble Android

00:10

Andy now uh I'll be real I switched back

00:13

to an Android because as cool as iPhones

00:16

and apple stuff is it's a little bit too

00:19

restrictive okay do you want to have

00:21

access to like every power user

00:23

application available well you're going

00:25

to have to go with Android and generally

00:27

I find the Android devices to be a

00:29

little bit more interesting I mean like

00:30

come on foldable devices let's be honest

00:32

a million cool things that you can do

00:34

with them that apple is not taken

00:36

advantage of but that being said ladies

00:38

and gentlemen uh today we're talking

00:40

about the fact that the United States

00:44

government yeah the biggest government

00:46

in the world is suing Apple now of

00:49

course you might have heard about the

00:50

Apple antitrust case well antitrust is a

00:53

pretty important thing in the entire

00:55

world to give you an idea what antitrust

00:57

basically is now for anybody that

01:00

follows the tech industry or anybody

01:02

that knows the history of these big tech

01:04

companies like Microsoft Apple Google

01:07

you probably know what the what

01:08

antitrust actually means so to give you

01:10

an idea according to the

01:12

ftc.gov antitrust laws or also known as

01:15

the Sherman Act is a comprehensive

01:18

Charter of economic Liberty aimed at

01:19

preserving free and unfettered

01:22

competition as the rule of trade so to

01:24

give you an idea the Sherman Act Outlaws

01:26

every contract combination or conspiracy

01:29

in Restraint of trade and any

01:31

monopolization attempted monopolization

01:34

or conspiracy or combination to

01:36

monopolize long ago the Supreme Court

01:39

decided the Sherman Act does not

01:40

prohibit every Restraint of Trades only

01:43

those that are

01:44

unreasonable so to give you an idea

01:47

obviously antitrust law exists in a

01:49

million shaped ways and forms and one of

01:51

the most popular cases that people refer

01:53

to is United States versus Microsoft

01:57

Corporation where if you actually read

01:59

through the ENT section over here you

02:01

can see that the case that the uh US

02:03

government is making under the Sherman

02:05

Act is Microsoft possesses Monopoly

02:08

power in the market for personal

02:09

computer operating systems Windows os

02:12

are used over 80% of intel-based PCS the

02:16

dominant type of PC in the United States

02:19

more than 90% of intel-based PCS are

02:21

shipped with a version of Windows

02:22

pre-installed and if you actually read

02:24

through this case it doesn't even feel

02:26

like a lawyer wrote it it actually feels

02:29

you like again

02:30

just people looking at the tech industry

02:32

at the time and making an actual

02:35

educated analysis as to why Microsoft

02:38

was basically being the deao bully King

02:42

right I mean they even went into things

02:44

like looking into their actual uh web

02:46

browser dominance and whatnot but

02:48

obviously dominance is one thing the

02:50

reason antitrust laws exist is to make

02:53

sure these big tech companies don't

02:55

become cartels or run a cartel so

02:58

basically the idea here here is

03:00

obviously if the if these if these laws

03:03

didn't exist Apple Microsoft Facebook

03:06

Google would probably eat up all the

03:08

competition and just completely run an

03:11

entire industry but because of antitrust

03:14

laws there are actually you know people

03:16

in place the government jumps in to

03:18

prevent these guys from getting just way

03:20

too powerful okay and if they do decide

03:23

to go beyond buying and eating up the

03:25

entire competition they're either forced

03:27

to break up or they get fined up the

03:29

apps for doing so so again how does this

03:32

Whittle on into Apple so to give you an

03:34

idea Apple has something known as the

03:36

wall garden now the wal Garden is

03:38

basically Apple's uh you know showcase

03:41

as to basically keeping people locked

03:44

within their ecosystem if you buy an

03:46

iPhone you're probably going to buy an

03:48

iPad or a Macbook or something in their

03:51

other Library just so that all of your

03:53

devices operate between each other and

03:56

Beyond just the devices the software

03:59

that's built into that device is

04:01

entirely controlled by Apple So when you

04:03

buy an iPhone you don't have the option

04:06

like Android users to install any app

04:08

store they want or any application they

04:10

want outside of Google's Play store if

04:13

you buy an iPhone you're only able to

04:15

install apps via the App Store and no

04:17

I'm not including the side loading that

04:20

people mention through other

04:21

applications I am strictly saying that

04:24

most of those almost everybody who is

04:27

using an iPhone is typically locked to

04:30

the App Store and that's pretty much how

04:31

it goes so there have been a couple laws

04:34

apple is basically been getting chewed

04:36

out by the entire world so for instance

04:38

the digital markets act all the way over

04:41

in EU is basically pushing apple as a

04:44

gatekeeper okay they're basically a big

04:46

dog and not just their phones but

04:49

services like iMessage okay so to

04:51

whittle this on to something more

04:53

relevant uh for people watching the

04:55

average Andy you might know about the

04:57

blue bubble green bubble controversy

04:59

right so when you are an iPhone user and

05:02

you message another iPhone through the

05:04

messages app it gets sent as a blue

05:07

bubble that's because iMessage is not a

05:09

traditional messaging service it's kind

05:11

of like WhatsApp it's an actual social

05:14

media messaging service just because

05:16

you're texting another iPhone it all

05:18

happens seamlessly you message people

05:20

with blue bubbles they get a better

05:22

version of messaging with you better uh

05:24

multimedia gets uh transmitted uh

05:27

encryption is of a higher standard it's

05:30

basically seamlessly better to message

05:32

between iPhone people now when you

05:33

message an Android person we're not part

05:36

of iMessage okay when we message you

05:38

we're the green bubble because Apple

05:40

defaults back to the green bubble and

05:43

they don't use any modern I say modern

05:46

but this is 2008 technology like RCS

05:49

because Apple just falls back to

05:51

traditional SMS meaning that all of the

05:53

media you send looks like dock [ __ ] when

05:56

you're in a group chat you're basically

05:58

ruining the experience for everybody

06:00

involved and there's no [ __ ]

06:02

encryption so also it's unsafe to be

06:05

sending messages and apple refuses to do

06:08

anything about it and that's why the

06:10

government has stepped in to basically

06:11

force them to update their [ __ ] so

06:14

looking into this right now you can

06:16

actually see that when they talk about

06:18

Gatekeepers what they say in the dma is

06:21

it basically means Gatekeepers have to

06:23

allow third parties to interoperate

06:26

within the gatekeeper's own service in

06:28

certain specific situations

06:30

and then allow their business users to

06:32

access the data that they generate in

06:34

the use of The Gatekeepers platform and

06:36

of course what they also say is

06:39

Gatekeepers May no longer treat services

06:41

and off products offered by the

06:43

gatekeeper itself more favorably in

06:46

ranking than similar services or

06:48

products by Third parties they basically

06:50

want people to have actual competition

06:53

and people to actually update their

06:54

stuff and have more Choice which is

06:57

ultimately a good thing anybody that's

06:59

taking Apple side here is literally

07:02

being uneducated this is all designed to

07:04

make your experience especially as an

07:06

Apple user more enjoyable and more

07:09

fulfilling and free now because of that

07:11

dma apple is basically being forced to

07:14

unlock their app stores and allow third

07:17

parties only in the countries and

07:19

Regions they're legally forced to so if

07:21

you're in the European Union because of

07:23

that act you can one day get epic games

07:26

installed onto your iPhone run fortnite

07:29

all outside Apple's ecosystem because

07:31

they're basically being forced to by

07:33

Apple now if you're in the United States

07:35

Canada because the law doesn't reflect

07:38

that well you don't get to be part of it

07:40

apple is literally complying to all of

07:42

this stuff because the government is

07:44

putting a gun to their head

07:46

metaphorically so at this moment in time

07:48

because of laws like that the US

07:50

government decided to actually Sue Apple

07:52

a couple days ago and we're going to

07:54

read a few excerpts from that actual

07:56

case because it's [ __ ] hilarious so

07:59

for instance in this complaint it starts

08:01

off like this in 2010 a Top Apple

08:04

executive emailed Apple's then CEO about

08:07

an ad for a new Kindle e-reader the ad

08:10

began with a woman who was using her

08:11

iPhone to buy and read books on the

08:13

Kindle app she then switches to an

08:16

Android smartphone and continues to read

08:18

a books using the same app the executive

08:21

wrote the jobs one message that can't be

08:24

missed is that it's easy to switch from

08:26

iPhone to Android not fun to watch and

08:30

this is kind of the ethos of apple right

08:32

it's not difficult to leave the iPhone

08:34

ecosystem there's plenty of iPhone you

08:37

know uh people that will say I can't

08:40

switch I'm already balls deep into this

08:42

right and to think about the ecosystem

08:44

how Wild it is is that Apple basically

08:46

built this platform not because they

08:49

were selling Mac systems beforehand in

08:52

fact they almost went bankrupt trying to

08:54

compete with Microsoft or really the

08:56

general consumer PC market it wasn't

08:59

until the iPod dropped and the iPhone

09:02

dropped that all of Apple's entire

09:04

fortunes turned around see the thing

09:07

about the iPod is it wasn't just the

09:09

iPod Hardware that sold like hot cakes

09:12

it was iTunes for a long time when I was

09:14

growing up people would purchase an iPod

09:17

and strictly buy their music from iTunes

09:20

they weren't buying it from anything

09:21

else they literally bought it from

09:23

iTunes because it would cost a buck it

09:25

was easy to get part of and you could

09:27

instantly sync it to your iPod now of

09:30

course beyond all of it when the iPhone

09:32

dropped it wasn't like smartphones

09:34

didn't exist before the iPhone they did

09:38

they were just hella clunky compared to

09:40

Apple's actual iPhone it gave you a

09:42

bunch of features and it was actually

09:44

easily usable it was intuitive it was

09:47

actually an amazing revolutionary

09:49

product and that iPhone is what keeps

09:51

apple sitting in the gravy there is that

09:54

is the strongest product they have ever

09:56

made thus far and no matter what what

09:59

you say iPhones if you want a phone that

10:02

just works they're not a bad buy even if

10:04

they are a tad bit on the expensive side

10:07

one of the things they mention in this

10:08

lawsuit is Apple's conduct also stifles

10:10

new paradigms that threatens Apple

10:13

smartphone dominance including the cloud

10:15

which could make it easier for users to

10:17

enjoy high-end functionality on a lower

10:19

priced smartphone or make users device

10:21

agnostic altogether as one apple manager

10:23

recently observed imagine buying a

10:26

Android for 25 bucks at a garage do sale

10:30

and it works fine and you have a solid

10:32

cloud computing device imagine how many

10:34

cases like that there are so what

10:37

they're basically saying over here is

10:39

that or alleging is that Apple will

10:41

actually stifle their software make it

10:43

just so iPhone appear Superior to their

10:45

actual people when in reality if they

10:47

enabled a couple pieces of Technology

10:49

like RCS the messaging experience

10:52

between Androids and iPhones would be a

10:54

lot better but Apple doesn't want that

10:57

to happen they don't want people to

10:58

think that switching to the other side

11:01

or going to the other side of the Iron

11:02

Curtain or godamn defecting in this case

11:05

is something that is possible okay

11:07

that's literally what's being alleged

11:09

here and again if you're an iPhone user

11:12

you should actually want Apple to make

11:14

their devices better compatible with

11:16

everything else around you it just makes

11:18

the experience better it doesn't make it

11:21

unsafe don't listen to Apple adopting

11:23

latest Technologies is not unsafe it

11:26

should just be something that they

11:27

should do so it gets even Wilder about

11:29

this stuff too is they highlight five

11:32

examples of Apple using their mechanisms

11:34

to suppress technologies that would

11:36

actually increase competition between

11:38

smartphones so what they mention are

11:41

super apps providing a user with broad

11:43

functionality in a in a single app super

11:46

apps can improve smartphone competition

11:48

by providing a consistent user

11:50

experience that can be prop ported

11:52

across devices suppressing super apps

11:55

harms all smartphone users including the

11:58

Apple users as well

11:59

then they have Cloud streaming game apps

12:01

provide users the way to play Computing

12:03

intensive games in the cloud cloud

12:06

streaming games can improve smartphone

12:08

competition by decreasing the importance

12:10

of expensive hardware for accomplishing

12:12

High compute tasks then they mention the

12:15

messaging applications that allow you to

12:17

communicate with everyone around you

12:19

messaging apps that work equally well

12:21

across all smartphones can improve

12:23

competition amongst them by allowing

12:26

users to switch phones without changing

12:28

the way they Comm communicate with

12:29

friends family and others and that's

12:31

true like me and my wife JY she has an

12:33

iPhone I have an Android okay we used to

12:36

use iMessage now we use apps like signal

12:39

which allow Android and iOS users to

12:42

have better messaging experiences

12:44

between each other all without Apple

12:46

basically ruining the experience just

12:49

between devices then they always mention

12:51

things like SmartWatches and then

12:53

digital wallets as well but where this

12:56

lawsuit gets actually hilarious is 0 90

12:59

okay so the funniest Point here is point

13:02

90 in addition to degrading the quality

13:04

of third-party messaging apps Apple

13:07

affirmatively undermines the quality of

13:09

rival smartphones for example if an

13:12

iPhone user messages a non- iPhone user

13:15

and apple messages the default app on

13:17

iPhone then the text appears to the

13:20

iPhone user as a green bubble and

13:22

incorporates limited functionality the

13:24

conversation is not encrypted videos are

13:26

pixelated and grainy and users cannot

13:28

edit Ed messages or C typing indicators

13:31

this signals to users that rival

13:33

smartphones are lower quality because

13:35

the experience of messaging friends and

13:37

families who do not own iPhones is worse

13:40

even though Apple not the Rival

13:42

smartphone is the cause of that degraded

13:44

user experience many non- iPhone users

13:47

also experience social stigma exclusion

13:51

and blame for breaking chats where other

13:54

participants own iPhones the effect is

13:57

particularly powerful for demographics

14:00

like teenagers where the iPhone share is

14:02

85% this social pressure reinforces

14:05

switching costs and drives users to

14:08

continue buying iPhones solidifying

14:10

Apple's dominance not because Apple made

14:12

its phone better but because it has made

14:15

communicating with other phones worse

14:17

true actually true now I think if you

14:20

stigmatize people for the green bubble

14:23

you're a [ __ ] shallow [ __ ] okay

14:25

simple as that but unfortunately it's a

14:27

piece of shallowness that exists

14:29

okay now I don't give a [ __ ] if I walk

14:31

into a group chat and I'm the green

14:32

bubble I will continue to use my Android

14:35

device because it is a genuinely better

14:37

device in my honest opinion but that

14:40

being said the fact that I am ruining a

14:42

group chat is not the fault of my device

14:45

my device can participate in those group

14:48

chats and a lot of those iMessage

14:49

features the only hindrances is Apple

14:53

and of course this is something that

14:54

obviously Google has constantly been

14:56

pushing Apple to fix const constantly if

14:59

you go to

15:00

android.com get the message this is an

15:03

actual campaign that's been going on for

15:05

a while and it touches upon these same

15:07

issues blurry messages shitty group

15:10

chats and just terrible messaging

15:13

experiences and all that needs to happen

15:16

literally all that needs to occur is

15:18

Apple enables or works with Google to

15:21

enable RCS which is Rich communication

15:24

Services which by the way is an industry

15:27

standard okay if Apple started doing

15:29

that most of these issues would be

15:32

alleviated and the iMessage experience

15:34

even if you have green bubbles would be

15:37

far more usable than you could imagine

15:39

the only reason green bubbles suck is

15:41

because Apple refuses to update and they

15:45

refuse to catch up with the times and

15:47

intentionally make the experience worse

15:49

to make their devices look better and in

15:52

some regions of the world Apple actually

15:55

has to enable something known as RCS

15:57

which is coming some time to iPhone in

16:00

the year

16:01

2024 and why is Apple doing this it's

16:04

not because they want to in any way it's

16:07

because they are legally being required

16:09

from my understanding and belief by

16:11

numerous regions around the world so

16:14

yeah iPhone or sorry apple is getting

16:16

sued by the US government and honestly

16:18

I'm actually on the US government side

16:20

over here because their actual arguments

16:23

do make a lot of sense Apple exists as

16:25

sort of a gatekeeper to having a good

16:27

experience not just for other people

16:30

interacting with their devices but for

16:32

people who are Apple users themselves

16:34

look if you like iPhone cool and you

16:36

might be wondering muda what if this

16:38

makes iPhone unsafe Apple's wal Garden

16:40

keeps me safe the reality is if Apple

16:43

allows you to sideload Applications you

16:45

don't have to sideload an application if

16:48

you want Total Safety you can actually

16:50

get security by sticking purely to the

16:53

App Store all that does is give actual

16:55

people the choice which is the most

16:58

important thing and we're talking about

17:00

messaging services what is the issue

17:03

with adopting technologies that allow

17:05

you to interact with All Brands all

17:08

operating systems properly using

17:10

services like RCS look at the end of the

17:12

day iMessage is never going to be opened

17:14

up that's a proprietary thing that Apple

17:16

will safeguard till their dying [ __ ]

17:19

breath but if you're getting green

17:21

bubbles at least update the standard to

17:24

make sure that interacting with other

17:25

people isn't a mess look at the end of

17:28

the day it's entirely up to Apple if

17:30

they want people to join in or not but I

17:32

think this is when the government has to

17:35

get involved because if Apple's not

17:36

going to change and update their stuff

17:38

to catch up with 2008 standards then

17:41

this is when the government has to step

17:43

in and basically force them to unlock

17:45

their Fisher Price phone and take us

17:47

into the modern day and age but yeah

17:50

apparently uh the US government has

17:52

taking them to task over the blue green

17:54

bubbles and honestly it is the funniest

17:56

[ __ ] that I've read in quite a long time

17:58

but ladies and gentlemen let me know

17:59

what you think about this in the comment

18:01

section below Apple seems to be [ __ ]

18:04

but honestly a company as large as them

18:06

can probably keep this going for a fair

18:08

bit of time but they're not only going

18:11

up against the United States they're

18:13

going up against the Chinese they're

18:14

going up against the European Union

18:16

every major region that they're playing

18:18

in and that is a [ __ ] sight to behold

18:22

that being said ladies and gentlemen if

18:23

you like what you saw please like

18:24

comment and subscribe dislike it if you

18:26

dislike it I am out