Demo of TurnItIn - New AI Detection Tool
TLDRIn the video, Dr. Moore from the University of Texas at Dallas demonstrates Turnitin's new AI detection tool by comparing AI-generated content to student writing. After submitting an AI-written memo on AI writers, Turnitin flags it with a 100% AI score, indicating potential academic misconduct. Dr. Moore emphasizes the tool's effectiveness in catching unauthorized AI use, which is considered cheating at their university, and encourages educators to adapt their assignments and rubrics to this new challenge.
Takeaways
- 👨🏫 Dr. Moore, a faculty member at the University of Texas at Dallas, discusses Turnitin's new AI detection tool.
- 📝 He tests the tool by using it on a memo assignment comparing AI writers, which he initially generated with Chat GPT.
- 📈 The Turnitin similarity score for the memo was 45%, indicating a match with previously uploaded content.
- 🔍 Turnitin did not flag the AI-generated content as problematic, but rather highlighted the sources included in the memo.
- 🚨 A new feature in Turnitin flags AI-generated content with an 'AI 100' notice, prompting a review for potential academic misconduct.
- 🤖 The video demonstrates that Turnitin's AI detection tool is effective in identifying AI-written essays, such as the one from Chat GPT.
- 📚 Faculty members are advised to consider changing their rubrics and assignments to adapt to the new capabilities of Turnitin's AI detection tool.
- 💡 The tool is expected to catch previously undetected instances of academic misconduct, particularly with the use of AI writing tools.
- 🎓 At the University of Texas at Dallas, using Chat GPT to complete assignments is considered unauthorized and could be treated as cheating.
- 📝 Dr. Moore critiques the AI-generated memo for lacking depth, a conclusion, and overall quality compared to what his students are capable of writing.
- 🌟 The video concludes with Dr. Moore encouraging students to focus on improving their own writing skills.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is the demonstration and discussion of Turnitin's new AI detection tool and its effectiveness in identifying AI-generated content in academic assignments.
Who is the speaker in the video?
-The speaker in the video is Dr. Moore, a faculty member at the University of Texas at Dallas.
How did Dr. Moore simulate a student's experience with AI writing tools?
-Dr. Moore simulated a student's experience by using ChatGPT to generate a memo comparing three AI writers based on a standard essay assignment prompt he gives to his students.
What was the similarity score given by Turnitin for the AI-generated memo?
-The similarity score given by Turnitin for the AI-generated memo was 45%.
What does the 45% similarity score indicate?
-The 45% similarity score indicates the percentage of the document that matches content already uploaded to Turnitin, and it is not the score for AI-generated content.
What message did Turnitin display regarding AI-generated content?
-Turnitin displayed a message saying 'AI 100' with a caution that the percentage may not indicate academic misconduct and that a review is required.
How did Turnitin's AI detection tool perform in the demonstration?
-Turnitin's AI detection tool correctly flagged the AI-generated essay with an 'AI 100' mark, indicating that it identified the content as entirely AI-written.
What implications does the AI detection tool have for faculty?
-The AI detection tool provides faculty with new strategies to detect and address AI-generated content in assignments, potentially requiring changes to grading rubrics and assignment structures.
What is the policy on using AI writing tools at the University of Texas at Dallas?
-At the University of Texas at Dallas, using AI writing tools like ChatGPT to complete assignments is considered unauthorized and can be treated as an incidence of cheating if reported.
What was Dr. Moore's critique of the AI-generated memo?
-Dr. Moore critiqued the AI-generated memo as being subpar, lacking a conclusion, and not as interesting or well-written as what he expects from his students.
What was the overall conclusion of the video?
-The overall conclusion of the video is that Turnitin's AI detection tool appears to be effective in identifying AI-generated content, and faculty should be aware of its capabilities to maintain academic integrity.
Outlines
👨🏫 Introduction to AI Detection Tool
Dr. Moore introduces himself as a faculty member at the University of Texas at Dallas and explains the purpose of the video: to demonstrate the capabilities of Turnitin's new AI detection tool. He describes his approach by imagining himself as a student in need and uses a standard essay assignment prompt to test the tool. Dr. Moore details the process of logging into Chat GPT, providing a prompt to compare AI writers, and the subsequent generation of a memo including sources. He then discusses uploading the memo to Turnitin and the resulting similarity score, highlighting that the score represents matches to previously uploaded content and not necessarily academic misconduct.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Turnitin
💡AI Detection Tool
💡Chat GPT
💡Memo
💡Plagiarism
💡Academic Integrity
💡Rubrics
💡Assignments
💡Faculty
💡Cautionary Message
💡Cheating
Highlights
Dr. Moore, a faculty member at the University of Texas at Dallas, explores Turnitin's new AI detection tool.
The demonstration involves using a standard essay assignment prompt typically given to students.
Instead of writing an essay, the assignment tasks students with writing a memo comparing AI writers.
Dr. Moore utilizes Chat GPT to generate a memo, including sources, for comparison of three AI writers.
The generated memo is uploaded to Turnitin, resulting in a similarity score of 45.
The 45% similarity score reflects matches with previously uploaded content, not flagged as problematic.
Turnitin's new feature flags the memo as 100% AI-written, with a caution message for review.
The sources included in the memo were not flagged by Turnitin's AI detection tool.
The new AI detection tool may change the way faculty approach rubrics and assignments.
Unauthorized use of Chat GPT for assignments is considered cheating at the University of Texas at Dallas.
Dr. Moore emphasizes the importance of original student writing over AI-generated content.
The AI-generated memo lacks quality, interest, and a proper conclusion compared to student writing.
Turnitin's AI detection tool is anticipated to catch instances of cheating that previous versions could not.
The video aims to inform faculty about the capabilities of Turnitin's new AI detection and its implications for academic integrity.
Dr. Moore concludes the video, hoping it was helpful and wishes luck to viewers.