Expert SPEAKS! Who will win the robot race, and who is likely to fail?
TLDRIn a discussion about the future of robotics, Dr. Scott Walter and Brian from Future Ozark explore the current landscape of the industry, identifying key players and speculating on potential winners and losers. They acknowledge the difficulty in predicting clear losers given the early stage of the market and the adaptability of companies to improve their technologies. Highlighted companies include Boston Dynamics, Tesla, and Figure AI, with each showcasing advancements and potential. The conversation also touches on the importance of real-world data and the expectation of wider deployment of robots by the end of the decade. The discussion is optimistic about the potential for niche specialization, comparing the robotics market to the automotive industry, where companies like Subaru have found success in specific areas.
Takeaways
- 🤖 There are over two dozen serious robotics companies with good R&D and strong backing, some of which are in China and North America.
- 📈 The market for robotics is large enough that even companies that are not number one can survive by finding their niche.
- 🚀 Companies like Boston Dynamics and Tesla have reset and are now back in the game with improved designs.
- 📊 While there are no clear 'losers', some companies in China may face tougher competition due to the dense landscape of capable competitors.
- 🤝 Companies like Agility Robotics and Sanctuary are focusing on specific niches and have solid financial backing, increasing their chances of survival.
- 💼 Insufficient funding can be a challenge, especially in competitive markets like China.
- 🔧 Fixable problems in robotics, such as bad approach to design or insufficient compute power, can be improved upon.
- 🚜 The automotive analogy suggests that even companies not leading the market can have a successful niche, like Subaru with their loyal following.
- 📈 Companies like Figure AI are integrating AI tools effectively and are expected to do well due to solid backing and design improvements.
- 🌟 Boston Dynamics' new design is sleeker and more refined, while Tesla's Gen 2 robot is noted for its covered design, making it more aesthetically pleasing.
- ⏰ Widespread public deployment of robots is not expected until later this decade, with pilot deployments and scaling up happening in the near future.
Q & A
What is the topic of discussion in the transcript?
-The topic of discussion is about the winners and losers in the field of robotics, focusing on humanoid robots and the companies involved in their development.
How many serious robotics companies are currently showing demos according to Dr. Scott Walter?
-Dr. Scott Walter mentions that there are easily a dozen serious robotics companies showing demos, with some of them having strong backing and good R&D capabilities.
What are some of the challenges faced by robotics companies, particularly in China?
-The challenges include fierce competition, the need for sufficient funding, and the requirement to find a niche in the large market to survive.
How does Dr. Scott Walter view the current state of the robotics market in comparison to the automotive industry?
-Dr. Walter compares the robotics market to the automotive industry, noting that while some companies may not be number one, they can still survive and thrive if they find their niche, much like Subaru in the automotive market.
What is the significance of the Nvidia Isaac platform for robotics companies?
-The Nvidia Isaac platform provides a significant advantage for robotics companies as it allows them to focus on developing their robots without having to worry about creating their own operating system, similar to how a smartphone manufacturer can license Android.
Which companies are mentioned as potential winners in the robotics race?
-Boston Dynamics, Tesla, Figure AI, Agility Robotics (with their Digit bot), Sanctuary, and EP Tronics (with their Apollo robot) are mentioned as potential winners.
What is the current status of the Tesla Bot?
-The current status of the Tesla Bot is not explicitly detailed in the transcript, but it is mentioned that it has a beautiful design and is in a slightly different league compared to others.
How does Dr. Scott Walter describe the Figure AI's approach to robotics?
-Dr. Walter describes Figure AI as having a good design for their first robot and being impressive in their training and integration of AI tools, which allows the robot to function as expected.
What is the expected timeline for widespread public deployment of humanoid robots?
-Dr. Walter expects that widespread public deployment of humanoid robots in non-exclusive settings will likely occur later in the decade, with pilot deployments and scaling up happening within the current year.
What are some of the early applications of non-humanoid robots that are already in use?
-Early applications of non-humanoid robots include autonomous lawnmowers at FedEx and Costco, inventory robots at Walmart, and security robots in parking lots that scan license plates.
What is the importance of real-world data for the development of robots?
-Real-world data is crucial for the development of robots as it allows companies to test and improve their designs in actual environments, which cannot be fully replicated in simulations.
Outlines
🤖 Robotics Industry: Winners and Losers
The discussion begins with a light-hearted debate on who might be considered a winner or loser in the robotics industry. Dr. Scott Walter joins Brian to discuss the current state of robotics companies, particularly focusing on humanoid robots. They touch on the number of serious companies in the field, the challenges faced by companies in China, and the potential for various companies to carve out their niche in the market. The conversation also explores the adaptability of companies to fix issues and the comparison of the robotics market to the automotive industry, specifically mentioning Subaru's niche market success.
🚀 Resurgence of Established Players and New Entrants
The speakers follow up on the topic of robotics companies, noting the challenges faced by early movers like Honda and Boston Dynamics. They discuss Boston Dynamics' reset and their return to the game, as well as the impressive designs of newer companies like Tesla and Figure AI. The conversation also highlights the importance of real-world testing and data for the development of robotics, with expectations of pilot deployments and increased production in the coming year. Agility Robotics' Digit bot is mentioned for its focus on a specific niche, and the potential of various companies to survive and succeed in the market is explored.
📈 Partnerships and the Impact on Robotics Development
The paragraph delves into the benefits of partnerships, particularly the collaborations with Nvidia's Isaac platform, which allows companies to focus on development without worrying about creating an operating system. The paragraph also mentions several North American companies, including Sanctuary and EP Tronics, and their unique approaches to robotics. The discussion emphasizes the long-term development and the potential for these companies to become significant players in the robotics industry. The unique design of Apollo from EP Tronics, with its linear drives, is highlighted as a potentially game-changing innovation.
🌐 Future Deployments and Public Interaction with Bots
The final paragraph speculates on the timeline for widespread public deployments of robots. It suggests that while pilot deployments and scaling are expected in the near future, widespread public sightings may not occur until later in the decade. The speakers discuss the importance of real-world data and the potential for companies to produce at least a thousand bots by next year. They also mention the possibility of seeing robots in various public settings by 2030 and acknowledge the existence of non-humanoid autonomous machines already in use in places like Walmart and FedEx.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Robotics
💡Humanoid Robots
💡R&D Chops
💡Niche
💡Competition
💡First Mover Disadvantage
💡Boston Dynamics
💡Tesla Bot
💡Figure AI
💡Agility Robotics
💡Pilot Deployments
Highlights
Dr. Scott Walter discusses the current state of robotics companies and their potential for success or failure.
There are over two dozen serious robotics companies with strong R&D and backing.
Chinese companies may face tougher competition in the robotics market.
Most companies do not show any major flaws in their approach, and the market is large enough for niche players to survive.
Companies like Subaru have a niche market and can survive even if they are not the market leader.
Funding is crucial for companies, especially in competitive landscapes like China.
Honda and Boston Dynamics faced first mover disadvantages but have since adapted and improved their technology.
Boston Dynamics has made a significant comeback with a new design that is sleeker and more refined.
Figure AI has a promising design and has integrated AI tools effectively, positioning them as a potential leader.
Agility Robotics' Digit robot focuses on a narrow niche in logistics and has shown reliability and durability.
Many robotics companies are partnering with Nvidia for their Isaac platform, which aids in development.
Sanctuary AI, based in Vancouver, has strong financial backing and focuses on AI embodiment.
EP Tronics, with their Apollo robot, has a unique design using linear drives and a team with experience from Boston Dynamics.
The widespread deployment of robots in non-exclusive settings is expected to occur later in the decade.
Pilot deployments and real-world data are crucial for the development of robotics technology.
Companies are aiming to have at least a hundred bots in real-world use by the end of the year.
Public sightings of robots are likely to increase gradually, with more noticeable presence by 2030.
Non-humanoid autonomous machines are already in use in various settings, such as inventory management at Walmart.