Ideogram Ai vs Midjourney COMPARED Print on Demand

Philip Anders
18 Sept 202309:24

TLDRIn this video, the creator compares two AI design platforms, Ideogram and Mid-Journey, using various print-on-demand prompts. They find that Ideogram excels at text generation but often struggles with graphic quality, while Mid-Journey offers superior graphics but has issues with text accuracy. The video showcases different results for prompts like a fall hat design and a Halloween skeleton, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each platform and providing insights for users deciding which tool to use for their design needs.

Takeaways

  • 🌟 The video compares two AI design platforms, Ideogram and Mid-Journey, for print-on-demand tasks.
  • 🎨 Ideogram tends to produce better text results, while Mid-Journey excels in graphics quality.
  • 📝 A fall design in the shape of a hat was tested, with Ideogram having a spelling error but better text, while Mid-Journey's graphics were preferred.
  • 🐱 A 'cat in a coffee cup' design showed that Ideogram provided a favorite result with correct spelling and appealing graphics.
  • ☕️ Mid-Journey's graphics for a cat with milk design were superior, despite some text inaccuracies.
  • 🚫 A design without text (sticker design) was tested, with Mid-Journey delivering more detailed and accurate graphics.
  • 🌄 For a sunset dinosaur scene, Mid-Journey's detailed graphics were praised, but some issues with shadows and shapes were noted.
  • 🎃 A Halloween t-shirt design comparison showed that Ideogram's style was more pleasing for print-on-demand, with all text spelled correctly.
  • 👻 In another Halloween prompt comparison, Ideogram provided better results for a ghost graffiti logo, while Mid-Journey's text was inaccurate.
  • 🇺🇸 An American flag themed design test revealed that Mid-Journey's results were more suitable for print-on-demand, despite some layout issues in Ideogram.
  • 🖼️ A tall format wall art design test showed that Ideogram's minimalistic style was preferred over Mid-Journey's crisper but less appealing result.
  • 📝 The video also addresses concerns about Ideogram's terms of service for commercial use, clarifying that generated content can be used commercially unless it infringes on third-party intellectual property.

Q & A

  • What is the main purpose of the video?

    -The main purpose of the video is to compare the results of two AI design platforms, Ideogram and Mid-journey, for print-on-demand prompts and to provide insights on which platform performs better in different aspects.

  • What was the first prompt tested in the video?

    -The first prompt tested in the video was for a fall design in the shape of a hat.

  • What issue was found with the first design from Ideogram?

    -The issue found with the first design from Ideogram was a spelling error in the text.

  • How did the user address the spelling error in the Ideogram design?

    -The user addressed the spelling error by using the remix function and running the prompt again to correct the mistake.

  • What was the result of the same prompt in Mid-journey?

    -The result of the same prompt in Mid-journey was a design with better graphics but worse text quality compared to Ideogram.

  • What is the user's favorite result from the 'cat in a coffee cup' prompt?

    -The user's favorite result from the 'cat in a coffee cup' prompt is the one with the correct spelling of 'cappuccino' and visually appealing graphics.

  • What is the main advantage of Ideogram over Mid-journey in the comparison?

    -The main advantage of Ideogram over Mid-journey is its ability to produce better text results, while Mid-journey excels in creating superior graphics.

  • What is the user's recommendation for using Ideogram for commercial purposes?

    -The user recommends checking the Ideogram's terms of service and ensuring that the generated content does not infringe on third-party intellectual property or copyrighted material for commercial use.

  • How does the video address concerns about the commercial use of AI-generated images?

    -The video addresses concerns by clarifying Ideogram's stance on commercial use, stating that as long as the generated images do not infringe on third-party rights, they should be safe to use for commercial purposes.

  • What is the final verdict on which platform is better for print-on-demand designs?

    -The final verdict is that while Mid-journey has better graphics, Ideogram often provides better text results, making it more suitable for print-on-demand designs.

  • What is the recommendation for users interested in trying Ideogram?

    -For users interested in trying Ideogram, the video recommends watching another video that provides a comprehensive overview of the tool and its usage for design purposes.

Outlines

00:00

🎨 Comparing Ideogram and Mid-Journey for Print-on-Demand Designs

The paragraph discusses a comparison between two AI design platforms, Ideogram and Mid-Journey, using specific prompts to generate designs for print-on-demand products. The author presents a fall design in the shape of a hat, highlighting that Ideogram produced a better text result despite a spelling error, while Mid-Journey's text was poorly executed. The author suggests using the parent or remix function for more accurate results and appreciates the styles from both platforms. The focus is on the strengths of each platform, with Ideogram excelling in text and Mid-Journey in graphics, as demonstrated through the comparison of their outputs for a cat in a coffee cup design. The author concludes that Ideogram did a better job overall with the given prompt.

05:01

👻 Evaluating Halloween Themed Designs on Ideogram and Mid-Journey

This paragraph evaluates Halloween-themed designs created with Ideogram and Mid-Journey. The author starts with a prompt for a ghost graffiti logo and compares the results, noting that Ideogram's graphics were superior, especially for the ghost design, while the text was inaccurately rendered. In contrast, Mid-Journey's text was more accurate but the graphics were less appealing. The author then discusses using a Mid-Journey prompt for an American flag design with a skull, which produced high-quality results for print-on-demand products, but Ideogram's output was less polished with wonky stars and lines. The paragraph ends with a discussion on the commercial use of AI-generated images, clarifying that Ideogram does not restrict the commercial use of generated content, as long as it doesn't infringe on third-party intellectual property rights. The author recommends checking out Ideogram for design needs and thanks the viewers.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡mid-journey

The term 'mid-journey' refers to an AI platform that is being compared with 'ideogram' in the context of this video script. It is used to evaluate which platform provides better results for print-on-demand prompts. The video discusses the strengths and weaknesses of mid-journey in terms of graphic quality and text accuracy. For instance, mid-journey is noted for its superior graphics, especially when there is no text involved, as seen in the comparison of a dinosaur-themed design and a Halloween-themed ghost logo.

💡ideogram

An AI platform that is being contrasted with 'mid-journey' in the video. 'Ideogram' is highlighted for its strengths in producing text results and for its ability to handle text-based prompts more effectively. However, it is also noted that 'ideogram' may not always match up to 'mid-journey' in terms of graphic quality. The platform's performance is evaluated through various prompts, such as a fall design in the shape of a hat and a Halloween t-shirt design.

💡print-on-demand

Print-on-demand is a service used for producing customized products, such as t-shirts, stickers, or mugs, where the design is only printed when an order is received. This concept is central to the video as the AI platforms are being assessed based on their suitability for creating designs intended for print-on-demand products. The discussion revolves around the quality of text and graphics that these platforms can produce, which directly impacts the appeal and marketability of the final printed products.

💡text accuracy

Text accuracy refers to the correctness of the written words in the output from an AI platform. In the context of the video, it is a critical factor when evaluating the AI-generated designs for print-on-demand products, as incorrect spellings can ruin the product's appeal. The video highlights instances where 'ideogram' excels in text accuracy, while 'mid-journey' sometimes falls short in this aspect.

💡graphics quality

Graphics quality pertains to the visual appeal, detail, and resolution of the images produced by an AI platform. High-quality graphics are essential for creating attractive and marketable print-on-demand products. The video discusses the comparative graphics quality of 'mid-journey' and 'ideogram,' noting that 'mid-journey' often leads in this area, especially when the design does not include text.

💡prompt

A prompt in this context is a set of instructions or a description given to an AI platform to generate a specific design or image. Prompts are crucial as they guide the AI in creating the desired output. The video script discusses multiple prompts used to test the capabilities of 'mid-journey' and 'ideogram,' and how these prompts influenced the resulting designs.

💡remix

In the context of the video, 'remix' refers to the process of taking an existing image or design and modifying it with new prompts or alterations to achieve a desired outcome. This is a common practice in AI design platforms, allowing users to refine and improve upon their initial results.

💡parent image

A parent image is the original image or design that serves as a base for further modifications or enhancements through AI platforms. Users often use parent images as a starting point to create variations or to apply new prompts, aiming for a more refined or desired outcome.

💡terms of service

Terms of service refer to the legal agreements or rules that users must agree to when using a platform or service. In the video, it is mentioned in relation to 'ideogram' and its unclear terms regarding commercial use of the generated content. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding and adhering to these terms, especially when it comes to using AI-generated content for commercial purposes.

💡commercial use

Commercial use refers to the application of any product, service, or content for monetary gain or business purposes. In the context of the video, it addresses the concerns about the use of AI-generated images from 'ideogram' for commercial purposes, emphasizing the need to respect third-party rights and permissions.

💡AI images

AI images are visual outputs created by artificial intelligence platforms using algorithms and machine learning to generate designs or artwork based on user inputs. The video compares the AI images produced by 'mid-journey' and 'ideogram,' focusing on their suitability for print-on-demand products and the balance between text accuracy and graphic quality.

Highlights

Comparison between ideogram and mid-journey for print-on-demand prompts

ideogram outperforms mid-journey in text accuracy for fall design prompt

mid-journey excels in graphics quality, especially for graphics without text

ideogram provides better text results for cat in a coffee cup design

Use of parent image and remix function to achieve desired style

Stickers and textless designs show varied results between ideogram and mid-journey

Halloween t-shirt design comparison reveals strengths in ideogram's style

Text accuracy issues in mid-journey's Halloween-themed design

American flag themed design showcases ideogram's graphic limitations

Wall art design preference leans towards ideogram's minimalistic style

Clarification on ideogram's terms of service regarding commercial use

ideogram does not restrict commercial use of generated content unless it infringes on third parties' intellectual property

Recommendation to check out ideogram for its innovative design capabilities

Personal preference plays a role in choosing between ideogram and mid-journey

Overall, ideogram shows promise but still has room for improvement in graphics

Mid-journey's market leadership in AI images is recognized