Shadiversity's SUS AI "art"
TLDRThe transcript discusses the challenges and limitations of AI-generated art, particularly in creating realistic human anatomy and character design. The speaker critiques an example of AI art, pointing out anatomical inaccuracies and the lack of skill required to produce such images, contrasting it with the detailed and expressive character sketches from traditional animation. The speaker also addresses the online debate surrounding AI art, arguing that while it offers new possibilities, it cannot replace the creativity and skill of human artists.
Takeaways
- 🤔 The speaker critiques the anatomy and proportions of a character, noting inconsistencies in hand and leg size.
- 🎨 The discussion highlights the challenges of AI art, particularly with complex poses and original character designs.
- 🚫 The speaker dismisses the idea that AI art is easy and argues that it requires skill and talent.
- 💪 The speaker compares AI art to the work of professional illustrators, emphasizing the speed and quality of their work.
- 👎 The critique extends to the rendering style of AI art, which the speaker finds greasy and unrealistic.
- 😅 The speaker humorously suggests that the AI artist should seek inspiration from real life rather than relying on AI.
- 🤯 The speaker points out the hypocrisy of an AI artist who criticizes traditional art while using AI to create his own art.
- 📸 The speaker emphasizes the importance of a clear and accurate reference, even suggesting the use of one's spouse as a model.
- 😕 The critique also touches on the insecurity of the AI artist, suggesting it drives his need for validation.
- 📈 The speaker invites others to take on the challenge of creating an original character, highlighting the limitations of AI in this task.
- 🤖 The discussion concludes with a defense of AI art, arguing that it can provide artistic fulfillment and should not be dismissed outright.
Q & A
What is the main issue discussed in the transcript regarding AI art?
-The main issue discussed is the limitations of AI art in creating complex and accurate human anatomy, specifically hands and poses, and the challenge of creating original characters with specific designs using only word prompts.
What is the speaker's opinion on AI art compared to traditional art?
-The speaker believes that while AI art has its place, it currently cannot replace the skill and talent of traditional artists, especially when it comes to creating complex and detailed character designs and anatomy.
How does the speaker describe the hands in the AI-generated image?
-The speaker describes the hands in the AI-generated image as 'weird' and 'strange', with incorrect anatomy and torsion, suggesting they resemble someone's hand when their wrist was tied up rather than a natural pose.
What is the 'challenge' mentioned by the speaker?
-The challenge is for someone to create an image of their own original character with the same pose, hand placement, and sword position as a specific AI-generated image, using only word prompts to prove that AI art can achieve the same level of quality as traditional art.
Who are some artists mentioned in the transcript and what is the speaker's opinion about them?
-The speaker mentions Kentaro Mura, the artist of One Punch Man manga, and Yusuke Murata, the creator of Berserk. The speaker admires their skill and work ethic, contrasting it with the AI art that they believe lacks the same level of detail and quality.
What is the speaker's view on the use of AI art in the artistic community?
-The speaker acknowledges that AI art can be fulfilling for some, but emphasizes that it should not be used to undermine the value and skill of traditional art forms. They argue that attacking people for creating art with AI does not contribute positively to the artistic community.
What is the speaker's stance on the future of AI in art?
-The speaker believes that while AI art has its limitations now, it does not mean it will stay that way forever. They suggest that with continuous development and improvement, AI could potentially become more capable in the art domain.
How does the speaker feel about the reactions to their opinions on AI art?
-The speaker seems to be unbothered by the negative reactions and criticism they receive, stating that they find joy in creating art and that the opinions of a few detractors will not change their passion or the fact that many others appreciate their work.
What is the significance of the 'hyperrealistic style' mentioned in the transcript?
-The 'hyperrealistic style' refers to the tendency of AI art to create images that are highly detailed and realistic, but the speaker argues that this style often highlights the inaccuracies and limitations of AI in rendering complex lighting and anatomy.
What is the speaker's advice to traditional artists who fear being replaced by AI?
-The speaker advises traditional artists to embrace AI as a tool that they can use to enhance their own art, rather than seeing it as a threat. They suggest that a talented artist can use AI to create better art than those who only rely on AI.
Outlines
🤔 Analyzing AI Art and Anatomy
The speaker critiques an AI-generated image, discussing the anatomical inaccuracies and the unrealistic proportions of the characters. They compare the AI's depiction of hands and wrists to that of someone being tied up, highlighting the strangeness of the pose. The speaker also mentions their own experience with drawing and the limitations of AI in capturing complex human anatomy. They challenge the notion that AI art requires no skill or talent, pointing out the difficulties in creating original characters and specific poses with AI alone.
👀 Observations on AI Art and Traditional Skills
The speaker continues their critique of AI art, discussing the hyperrealistic style and its flaws, such as incorrect lighting and shadows. They contrast this with the work of professional illustrators, like Kentaro Miura and Yusuke Murata, who can produce high-quality art quickly due to their extensive practice and skill. The speaker emphasizes that while AI can be a tool, it cannot replace the creativity and expertise of traditional artists. They also touch on the topic of AI art's appeal to certain niches and the importance of not dismissing traditional art forms.
😅 Reflecting on AI Art Creation Process
The speaker delves into the process of creating AI art, sharing their personal experience with using AI tools to generate images. They discuss the steps involved, from hand-drawn sketches to using various digital tools and techniques. The speaker argues that AI art still requires a significant amount of work and artistic ability, contrary to the belief that it is easy and effortless. They also mention the reactions to their work, both positive and negative, and how they plan to share their process in a future video.
😒 Critiquing AI Art's Realism and Anatomy
The speaker critiques the realism of AI-generated art, particularly focusing on the anatomy and proportions of the characters. They point out the inconsistencies in the depiction of the human form, such as the unrealistic size and shape of certain body parts. The speaker suggests that observing real-life models and practicing traditional drawing techniques could improve the quality of AI art. They also discuss the potential for AI art to be used inappropriately and the ethical considerations that come with it.
😤 Debating the Merits of AI Art
The speaker engages in a heated debate about the merits of AI art, discussing the challenges and limitations of using AI for character design. They compare AI art to traditional animation and the economy of line used by skilled animators. The speaker criticizes the lack of life and emotion in AI-generated character models and argues that AI art has not yet reached the level of quality and expressiveness found in traditional art forms. They also address the negative reactions to their views, emphasizing that their critique is of the technology, not the individuals who create AI art.
😓 Reflecting on AI Art Criticism and Personal Validity
The speaker reflects on the criticism they have received for their views on AI art, expressing a mix of frustration and sadness. They defend their right to critique AI art and question the self-awareness of those who defend it without acknowledging its limitations. The speaker emphasizes that their love for creating art, whether traditional or AI-generated, is not diminished by criticism. They also highlight the support they have received from others who appreciate their work, and they encourage a more honest and constructive dialogue about the role of AI in art.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Torsion
💡Waifu
💡Anatomy
💡AI Art
💡Character Design
💡Libertarian
💡Pleated Skirts
💡Hyperrealistic
💡3D Modeling
💡Artistic Ability
Highlights
Discussion on the anatomical inaccuracies and strange torsion in a hand drawing.
Mention of a wrist that appears to be tied up, indicating a potentially violent or restrictive context.
Critique of the unrealistic proportions of a character's leg compared to her torso.
Analysis of the character's hands and wrists, pointing out their unrealistic angles and positions.
Comparison of the character's anatomy to that of a 'fuzzy handcuff hand', suggesting a lack of naturalism.
Discussion on the challenges of AI art in creating original characters and complex poses.
Challenge issued to create an original character with specific features using only word prompts.
Critique of the hyperrealistic rendering style of AI art, highlighting its limitations.
Comparison of the productivity and quality between AI art and traditional art by professional illustrators.
Mention of specific artists like Kentaro Miura, known for their skill and productivity in traditional art.
Critique of the unrealistic lighting and shadows in AI-generated images.
Discussion on the use of AI art in character design and its limitations compared to traditional methods.
Observation that AI art often lacks the 'life' and dynamic quality of traditional character sketches.
The importance of practicing and refining one's skills in art, regardless of the medium used.
Critique of the portrayal of female characters in AI art, suggesting a lack of attention to anatomical accuracy.
The potential for traditional artists to enhance their work with AI tools, rather than being replaced by them.
The creator's defense of AI art and its value, despite criticisms and challenges.