ALMOST UNTHINKABLE: Jasmine Crockett Fires Back At Marjorie Taylor Greene And Chaos Erupts

Forbes Breaking News

16 May 202409:40

Summary

TLDRThe video script captures a chaotic and heated exchange during a committee meeting. Tensions rise as members argue over procedural rules, with one member accused of making personal remarks about another's intelligence. The chair struggles to maintain order, leading to a motion to strike offensive words and a subsequent objection. Amidst the confusion and shouting, the committee decides to suspend for five minutes to resolve parliamentary questions, highlighting the discord and lack of decorum in the proceedings.

Takeaways

🗳️ A vote was conducted with 21 in favor, 19 against, and one member voting 'present'.
💡 Miss Green was recognized to speak for four minutes and 21 seconds.
🤔 Miss Crockett asked for clarification on the rules regarding personal remarks.
🚫 A motion was made to strike words from the record due to personal attacks.
🔍 There was confusion about the exact words that needed to be struck from the record.
📢 There were several interruptions and outbursts during the proceedings.
🔊 Miss Green mentioned her difficulty in hearing due to being deaf.
🚫 The chair ruled to strike the words where Miss Green insulted Miss Ocasio-Cortez's intelligence.
🤝 An objection was raised against the chair's ruling.
🕒 A motion was made to recess to a time certain the following day to continue the discussion.
👥 There were concerns raised about non-committee members participating in the hearing.

Q & A

What was the outcome of the initial vote mentioned in the transcript?
-The initial vote resulted in 21 eyes (yeas) and 19 nays, with one person voting present.
Who is recognized to speak after the initial vote?
-Miss Green is recognized to speak for four minutes and 21 seconds.
What is Miss Crockett's point of order regarding personal remarks?
-Miss Crockett is inquiring if discussing someone's bleached, blind, bad, built body would be considered engaging in personalities, which is typically not allowed.
What motion is made by the chairman regarding the personal remarks made?
-The chairman makes a motion to strike the words from the record, suggesting that the personal remarks made were inappropriate.
What is the confusion regarding the motion to strike words from the record?
-There is confusion about which set of remarks should be struck from the record—the first or second set made by Miss Green.
Why is Miss Green not recognized to speak at one point during the transcript?
-Miss Green is not recognized to speak because of the rules of the committee, which were violated by her personal remarks.
What is the issue with Miss Green's hearing ability mentioned in the transcript?
-Miss Green mentions that she is very deaf and is having difficulty understanding everyone's yelling during the hearing.
What is the final decision regarding Miss Green's remarks about Miss Ocasio-Cortez's intelligence?
-The chair rules to strike the words where Miss Green said Miss Ocasio-Cortez lacked intelligence from the record.
What is the consequence for Miss Green after her words are stricken from the record?
-It is suggested that Miss Green cannot speak in the hearing for the rest of the session due to the stricken words.
What action is taken to address the escalating situation and parliamentary questions in the hearing?
-The committee decides to suspend for five minutes to allow staff to work out the parliamentary questions.
What is the final action suggested to be taken by the chairman to conclude the hearing session?
-The chairman suggests adjourning the hearing session, and there is also a motion to adjourn mentioned by a member.

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ Heated Committee Exchange

In a tense legislative committee meeting, a vote is taken with a close result of 21 in favor and 19 against, with one member voting present. Miss Green is recognized to speak for four minutes and 21 seconds. A point of order is raised by Miss Crockett, questioning the chair's ruling on inappropriate personal remarks. Amidst the chaos, a motion is made to strike certain words from the record, leading to further debate and confusion. The chair attempts to maintain order, but the situation escalates with members yelling and challenging each other's remarks. The meeting is temporarily suspended to address parliamentary questions and to allow members to take a break.

05:59

📝 Parliamentary Confusion and Adjournment

The committee reconvenes with the chair ruling to strike Miss Green's words where she allegedly insulted Miss Ocasio-Cortez's intelligence. There is confusion over the exact wording and the procedure to strike the words. The chair asserts that Miss Green cannot speak for the rest of the session due to the rules of the committee. The meeting becomes more disorderly with personal remarks about members' bodies and other unrelated comments. The chair calls for a motion to adjourn, and there are suggestions to address the long hours and the behavior of members. The meeting is suspended for five minutes to resolve parliamentary issues, with an apology to the viewers at home for the disruption.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Chair

The 'chair' in the context of this transcript refers to the person presiding over a committee meeting or hearing. The chair has the authority to recognize speakers, maintain order, and make rulings on procedural matters. In the video, the chair is seen making decisions such as striking words from the record and recognizing members to speak, which is central to the governance and flow of the meeting.

💡Motion

A 'motion' is a proposal made by a member of a legislative or committee body to take a specific action. In the transcript, several motions are made, such as to 'strike' certain words from the record or to 'adjourn' the meeting. These motions are a key part of parliamentary procedure, driving the progression of the meeting and the decisions made within it.

💡Strike

'Strike' in parliamentary language means to remove or delete something from the official record of proceedings. In the video, there is a motion to 'strike' words spoken by Miss Green, which implies that her comments are to be officially disregarded and removed from the transcript of the meeting.

💡Personal Remarks

Personal remarks are comments directed at an individual's personal characteristics rather than their position or argument. In the script, there is a concern raised about engaging in 'personalities', which refers to making personal attacks, and this is seen as inappropriate behavior within the committee.

💡Adjourn

To 'adjourn' means to end a meeting or session, often temporarily. In the transcript, there is a suggestion to 'adjourn', indicating a desire to pause the current proceedings, which may be due to the heated or unproductive nature of the discussion.

💡Point of Order

A 'point of order' is a member's claim that a breach of parliamentary procedure has occurred, which requires the chair's intervention. In the video, a member raises a point of order to seek clarification on the chair's ruling, which is a mechanism to ensure that the meeting is conducted according to established rules.

💡Recognition

In a committee setting, 'recognition' by the chair is necessary before a member can speak. The chair controls who is allowed to speak and when, as seen in the transcript when the chair recognizes Miss Green for a specific duration to speak.

💡Parliamentary Questions

Parliamentary questions refer to inquiries about the rules and procedures of a legislative body. In the script, there is mention of 'suspending' the meeting for five minutes while staff work out 'parliamentary questions', indicating a need to resolve procedural issues before continuing.

💡Yeas and Nays

'Yeas and Nays' is a voting method where members vocally state their vote for or against a proposal. The transcript begins with a tally of 'yeas' and 'nays', which is a common way to determine the outcome of a vote in a committee or legislative setting.

💡Unanimous Consent

Unanimous consent means that all members of a legislative body must agree to a particular action or decision. In the video, there is a mention of needing unanimous consent to allow a member to speak, highlighting the requirement for full agreement in certain procedural actions.

💡Deaf

In the transcript, a member mentions being 'deaf', which refers to having a significant hearing impairment. This context shows the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in a hearing environment and the need for accommodations to ensure equal participation.

Highlights

The vote resulted in 21 eyes and 19 nays, with one voting present.

Miss Green was recognized to speak for 4 minutes and 21 seconds.

A motion was made to strike certain words from the record.

Miss Crockett asked for clarification on whether discussing someone's physical appearance would be considered engaging in personalities.

A motion was made to strike Miss Green's words for the second set of remarks, not the first.

Miss Green asserted that Miss Ocasio-Cortez lacked intelligence, which was objected to.

The chair ruled to strike the words where Miss Green said Miss Ocasio-Cortez was not intelligent.

There was confusion about whether the words were to be taken down or stricken from the record.

Miss Green was not permitted to speak for the rest of the session after her words were stricken.

A motion was made to adjourn the hearing.

The committee decided to suspend for 5 minutes to allow staff to work out parliamentary questions.

Members not on the committee were observed sitting in the hearing room.

Some members were seen drinking inside the hearing room.

Miss Green mentioned that she is very deaf and having difficulty understanding everyone yelling.

Miss Green objected to the chair's ruling to strike her words from the record.

There was a point of order raised to recess the committee until a time certain the next day.

A motion was made to strike additional remarks about Marjorie's body.

The chair called for compliance with the quorum and order to be restored.