'Miserable' and 'Annoyed': What Rachel Maddow saw inside Trump's criminal trial

MSNBC
22 Apr 202410:11

Summary

TLDRIn a historic courtroom setting, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow provides an insightful account of the atmosphere and proceedings involving the former President Donald Trump. She describes the courtroom as 'dingy', contrasting with Trump's luxury brand image, and details the intense and sober atmosphere. Maddow outlines the distinct styles of the prosecution and defense, with the prosecution presenting a clear, straightforward case, while the defense takes a more emotional and elaborate approach. She also observes Trump's demeanor as 'inert' and 'slumped', suggesting he appeared 'older, thinner, annoyed, and angry'. Additionally, she notes the prosecutor's challenge in extracting direct answers from David Pecker, a key witness who testified under subpoena. Maddow's observations highlight the complexity of the case and the contrasting narratives presented by both sides.

Takeaways

  • đŸ€” The discussion suggests that the complexity of the case might not resonate as a crime with some individuals, highlighting the prosecutor's challenge to establish it as a felony offense.
  • 📚 Rachel Maddow, from MSNBC, was one of the few people inside the courtroom and provided insights into the atmosphere and proceedings.
  • 🏛 The courtroom was described as 'dingy' and not reflective of the luxury brand Donald Trump represents, setting a stark contrast to his public image.
  • đŸ‘źâ€â™‚ïž There was a notable presence of law enforcement and a very sober and intense atmosphere during the trial.
  • 📈 The prosecution presented a reserved and prepared case, while Trump's defense was more emotional and ad-libbed.
  • 🔍 The prosecution aimed to present the case as both serious and an open-and-shut case, leaving no doubt in the jury's mind about the alleged crime.
  • 💭 The defense's strategy involved a counterfactual narrative, suggesting alternative explanations for the evidence and aiming to appeal to the jury's emotions.
  • đŸ‘¶ Donald Trump's demeanor in court was observed to be inert and slumped, possibly indicating stress or discomfort with the situation.
  • 👮 Rachel Maddow noted that Trump appeared thinner, older, and annoyed, suggesting a significant change in his physical and emotional state.
  • đŸ—Łïž David Pecker, the former head of a media company, testified under subpoena and was described as soft-spoken and somewhat evasive in his responses.
  • ✍ There were procedural interruptions in the court, such as jurors being provided with writing materials, which affected the pace of the proceedings.

Q & A

  • What was the general atmosphere in the courtroom during the trial?

    -The atmosphere was described as very intense and sober, with a striking contrast between the prosecution's reserved presentation and the defense's more emotional and ad-libbed approach.

  • How did Rachel Maddow describe the courtroom setting?

    -Rachel Maddow described the courtroom as 'dingy,' comparing it to a high-sealing DMV office, which was a notable contrast to the luxury brand image that the former president tried to embody.

  • What was the prosecution's approach to presenting their case?

    -The prosecution's approach was straightforward and serious, presenting their case without equivocation, caveat, or parenthetical phrases, aiming to leave no doubt in the jurors' minds about the defendant's guilt.

  • How did the defense team present their case?

    -The defense team's presentation was more baroque and emotional, with a lot of ad-libbing and a detailed, elaborate story that aimed to connect the dots in a way that would appeal to the jurors' hearts as well as their minds.

  • What was Rachel Maddow's observation of Donald Trump's demeanor in the courtroom?

    -Rachel Maddow observed that Donald Trump seemed inert, slump-shouldered, and not particularly animated. She noted that he appeared thinner, older, and seemed annoyed, resigned, and possibly angry.

  • How did David Pecker present himself during his testimony?

    -David Pecker, described as physically small and soft-spoken, presented himself in a somewhat elliptical manner, requiring the prosecutor to ask direct questions multiple times to get a clear answer.

  • What was the significance of David Pecker's testimony?

    -David Pecker's testimony was significant as he was discussing his role in the publication decisions of his former company, which is central to the case involving Donald Trump.

  • What was the reaction of Donald Trump when he came out of the courtroom?

    -Donald Trump was notably annoyed and angry, repeating that the situation should not be happening and describing the matter as a simple bookkeeping issue.

  • How did the prosecution aim to convince the jury of the defendant's guilt?

    -The prosecution aimed to present the case as both serious and open-and-shut, with a clear and cogent story that would set the stage for the jury to believe and understand why the charges were brought.

  • What was the defense's strategy in response to the prosecution's case?

    -The defense's strategy involved advancing a counterfactual narrative, suggesting alternative explanations for the evidence, such as the invoices being for legal retainers and denying any sexual encounter between Trump and Stormy Daniels.

  • What was the role of David Pecker in the case?

    -David Pecker, the former head of a media company, was called as a witness and testified under subpoena, with his testimony being a part of the prosecution's case against Donald Trump.

  • What was the general public's perception of the trial?

    -The general public's perception was not directly addressed in the script, but it can be inferred that the trial was considered historic and highly anticipated, given the mention of it being a 'hot ticket' and the privilege of being able to cover it.

Outlines

00:00

đŸ›ïž Courtroom Atmosphere and Presentation Styles

The first paragraph describes the setting of a courtroom where Donald Trump is present. The reporter, Rachel Maddow, expresses her gratitude for being allowed into the courtroom and acknowledges the historic nature of the event. She paints a picture of the courtroom as a somewhat dingy space, contrasting with Trump's luxury brand image. The summary outlines the intense and sober atmosphere, the different presentation styles of the prosecution and defense, with the prosecution being reserved and the defense more emotional and ad-libbed. It also touches upon the prosecution's clear and direct approach in presenting the case as a serious and open-and-shut case, while the defense's strategy was more complex and detailed, aiming to connect the dots with emotional appeal. The paragraph ends with a mention of David Pecker, suggesting a continuation of the narrative.

05:01

đŸ‘€ Observations on Trump's and Pecker's Demeanor

The second paragraph focuses on Rachel Maddow's observations of Donald Trump's behavior and demeanor in the courtroom. She notes that Trump appeared in a slumped position, not very animated, and seemed to be leaning heavily on the desk while listening to the testimonies. Maddow mentions that she is not an expert in body language but shares her impression of Trump appearing thinner, older, and annoyed, with a sense of resignation and anger. She also comments on Trump's expression of being miserable to be present at the trial. Additionally, she briefly discusses David Pecker's appearance and manner of testifying, noting that he was soft-spoken and his answers were somewhat evasive, requiring the prosecutor to ask multiple questions to get direct responses. The summary also highlights Pecker's self-description as a 72-year-old consultant and his testimony being conducted under subpoena.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Trial Lawyers

Trial lawyers are legal professionals who specialize in representing clients in court during trials. In the context of the script, it is mentioned that the individuals in question are not trial lawyers, which could imply a concern over their ability to perform in a courtroom setting. The absence of trial lawyers might affect the presentation of the case and the outcome of the trial.

💡Rachel Maddow

Rachel Maddow is a television host and political commentator who is known for her show on MSNBC. In the script, she is brought in to provide firsthand observations of Donald Trump's appearance in the courtroom. Her role is significant as she provides insights into the atmosphere and proceedings of the trial, which is central to the narrative of the video.

💡Courtroom Atmosphere

The courtroom atmosphere refers to the mood and environment within the court during a trial. The script describes the atmosphere as intense, sober, and with a lot of 'kinetic activity,' indicating a high level of alertness and movement. This atmosphere is crucial as it sets the tone for the trial and can influence the jury's perception.

💡Prosecution

The prosecution refers to the legal team that represents the government or plaintiff in a criminal or civil case, with the responsibility to prove the guilt of the defendant. In the script, the prosecution is described as presenting a reserved and cogent case, which is a strategic approach to convincing the jury of the defendant's guilt.

💡Defense

The defense is the legal team representing the defendant in a trial, aiming to provide a counter-argument to the prosecution's case. The script notes that President Trump's defense was more emotional and involved ad-libbing, suggesting a strategy to appeal to the jury on a more personal level.

💡Objections

In a legal context, objections are formal protests made by a lawyer during a trial, typically concerning the admissibility of evidence or the relevance of a line of questioning. The script mentions that there were multiple objections from the prosecutors, which led to discussions at the bench, highlighting a contentious aspect of the trial.

💡Jury

A jury is a group of people sworn to render a verdict in a trial, based on the evidence presented. The script discusses how the case is being presented to the jury, emphasizing the importance of the jury's role in determining the outcome of the trial. The jury's understanding and belief in the case presented to them is pivotal.

💡Complexity of the Case

The complexity of the case refers to the intricacy and difficulty in understanding and presenting the facts and legal arguments in a trial. The script suggests that the case's complexity might affect how jurors perceive the evidence and the charges, with some potentially not seeing it as a crime.

💡David Pecker

David Pecker is mentioned in the script as a witness in the trial. He is described as a physically small, soft-spoken man who testified under subpoena. His testimony and demeanor are noted as significant aspects of the trial's proceedings.

💡Donald Trump's Affect

Donald Trump's affect refers to his emotional state and behavior as observed during the trial. The script describes him as seeming 'inert,' 'slumped,' and 'annoyed,' suggesting a negative emotional response to the trial's events. His affect could potentially influence public perception and the jury's sentiment.

💡Counterfactual

A counterfactual is an argument that presents an alternative version of events or circumstances. In the script, the defense's counterfactual involves presenting alternative explanations for the evidence, such as suggesting that certain invoices were for legal services rather than for hush money. This strategy is used to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative.

Highlights

The courtroom atmosphere was described as intense and sober, with a striking contrast between the prosecution's reserved presentation and the defense's more emotional approach.

Rachel Maddow, an MSNBC reporter, was one of the few people inside the courtroom and provided a firsthand account of the proceedings.

The former president was observed sitting in a room that felt like a high-ceilinged DMV office, which was a notable contrast to his luxury brand image.

The prosecution's opening statement was very cogent and presented without equivocation, asserting that the case was both serious and open-and-shut.

The defense's opening statement involved a lot of ad-libbing and was more baroque, with a detailed counterfactual narrative.

There was significant kinetic activity in the courtroom as prosecutors started objecting to the defense's opening statement.

The judge had to call multiple times for counsel to approach the bench to discuss objections.

David Pecker, the former CEO of American Media, Inc., testified in the case and was described as physically small, soft-spoken, and somewhat evasive in his responses.

President Trump's demeanor in the courtroom was observed as inert, with slumped shoulders, and he appeared thinner, older, and annoyed.

Trump was described as seeming miserable to be present in the courtroom, with an affect that was a mix of resignation, anger, and annoyance.

When Trump exited the courtroom, he was notably annoyed and repeated several fact-based claims, emphasizing the case as a simple bookkeeping matter.

The prosecution's strategy was to tell a clear and straightforward story to set the stage for the jury, focusing on why the charges were brought.

The defense, led by Todd Blanche, advanced a counternarrative, suggesting that the invoices from Michael Cohen were for legal services and disputing the allegations.

The presentation styles of the prosecution and defense were markedly different, with the prosecution being more cerebral and simple, while the defense was more emotional and elaborate.

Rachel Maddow emphasized that her observations were not from a professional body language expert's perspective but rather her own keen observations and analytical skills.

The overall tone of the courtroom was described as very serious, with both sides presenting their cases in a manner that aimed to convince the jury of their respective narratives.

The proceedings were interrupted for logistical reasons, such as providing jurors with writing implements and pads of paper, which affected the pace of the trial.

Transcripts

00:01

IT DEPENDS ON THE LAWYER.

00:04

AS I SAID, IF THEY'RE TRIAL

00:05

LAWYERS, AND I DON'T THINK

00:06

EITHER OF THEM ARE, THAT'S A

00:07

PROBLEM.

00:07

>> LET US BRING IN SOMEONE WHO

00:09

ACTUALLY SAW DONALD TRUMP IN THE

00:12

COURTROOM, RACHEL MADDOW.

00:14

MSNBC'S RACHEL MADDOW, ONE OF

00:15

THE VERY FEW PEOPLE INSIDE THE

00:18

COURTROOM TODAY.

00:21

RACHEL, FILL IN THE GAPS.

00:23

WHAT WAS IT LIKE?

00:24

>> Reporter: FIRST OF ALL,

00:27

THANKS FOR HAVING ME AND THANKS

00:28

TO EVERYBODY AT NBC WHO MADE IT

00:30

POSSIBLE FOR ME TO GET INTO THE

00:31

COURTROOM.

00:32

I REALIZE IT'S A HOT TICKET AND

00:34

IT'S PRIVILEGE TO COVER

00:35

SOMETHING THIS HISTORIC.

00:36

I WILL SAY JUST IN TERMS OF THE

00:38

VIBE IN THE ROOM, WHAT YOU HAVE

00:41

HEARD ABOUT IT BEING KIND OF A

00:44

DINGY COURTROOM IS REAL.

00:45

IT'S NOT NECESSARILY IMPORTANT

00:47

IN TERMS OF THE WAY THE WHEELS

00:48

OF JUSTICE GRIND.

00:49

IT IS STRIKING TO SEE THE FORMER

00:51

PRESIDENT, SOMEBODY WHO HAS

00:53

TRIED TO EMBODY THE LUXURY BRAND

00:54

SITTING IN A ROOM THAT

00:58

ESSENTIALLY FEELS LIKE A

01:01

HIGH-SEALING DMV OFFICE.

01:03

LOTS OF PRIS PRESENCE.

01:05

VERY INTENSE ATMOSPHERE, VERY

01:07

SOBER ATMOSPHERE.

01:08

TWO VERY DIFFERENT STYLES OF

01:10

PRESENTATION.

01:12

THE PROSECUTION WAS RESERVED.

01:15

PROSECUTE ERMA THANK YOU

01:18

COLANGELO WHO MADE THE OPENING

01:20

STATEMENT READ FROM PREPARED

01:24

REMARKS ARE VERY COGENT

01:27

PRESENTATION.

01:28

PRESIDENT TRUM'S DEFENSE WAS

01:30

MORE EMOTIONAL, A LOT OF

01:32

AD-LIBBING.

01:32

THERE WAS -- NOT CHAOS, BUT A

01:36

LOT OF KINETIC ACTIVITY WHEN

01:38

PROSECUTORS STARTED OBJECTING TO

01:39

THE OPENING STATEMENT.

01:40

THE JUDGE CALLED MULTIPLE TIMES

01:42

FOR COUNSEL TO APPROACH THE

01:44

BENCH AND DISCUSS THOSE

01:46

OBJECTIONS.

01:47

JUST TWO VERY DIFFERENT WAYS OF

01:51

PRESENTING THE CASE TO THE JURY.

01:53

WE GOT A REAL ROADMAP AS TO HOW

01:55

THIS CASE IS GOING TO DO.

01:57

>> RACHEL, ONE OF THE THINGS I

01:59

KEEP HEARING ABOUTnd READING

02:02

ABOUT IS HOW COMPLEX THIS

02:04

ACTUALLY IS, WHEN YOU WANT TO

02:06

MAKE THE DOTS TO GO TOGETHER,

02:08

FOR SOME PEOPLE IT'S NOT GOING

02:09

TO RISE TO THE LEVEL IN THEIR

02:13

MIND OF A CRIME.

02:14

IT'S UP, OBVIOUSLY, TO THE

02:16

PROSECUTOR TO MAKE THAT CASE

02:17

THIS ISN'T JUST ABOUT HUSH

02:19

MONEY, BUT HERE IS WHY THIS IS A

02:23

FELONY OFFENSE UNDER THE LAW.

02:26

DID THEY DO THAT?

02:28

WHAT WAS A CLEAR, COGENT STORY

02:30

IN YOUR HEARING, UNDERSTANDING

02:32

THAT RACHEL MADDOW HAS MORE OF

02:36

AN UNDERSTANDING OF THIS CASE

02:39

THAN THE AVERAGE JUROR MIGHT,

02:41

BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MANY

02:43

PROSECUTORS HAVE TOLD ME OVER

02:44

THE YEARS IS, MY JOB IS TO GO

02:46

AND TELL A STORY THAT'S GOING TO

02:48

SET THE STAGE FOR THE JURY TO

02:50

BELIEVE AND UNDERSTAND WHY I

02:51

BROUGHT THESE CHARGES.

02:53

THAT SIMPLE.

02:54

>> Reporter: YES, AND THAT IS

02:55

ABSOLUTELY WHAT YOU SAW TODAY

02:57

FROM THE PROSECUTION.

02:59

I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE JURY WILL

03:00

ULTIMATELY DECIDE.

03:01

WE DON'T KNOW HOW THE EVIDENCE

03:03

WILL BE PRESENTED.

03:04

WE DON'T KNOW WHICH SIDE WILL BE

03:06

COMPELLING IN THE MINDS OF THESE

03:07

12 NEW YORKERS.

03:08

WHEN THE PROSECUTION GOT UP

03:10

TODAY, WHAT THEY SAID WAS,

03:13

WITHOUT EQUIVOCATION, WITHOUT

03:16

CAVEAT, WITHOUT PARENTHETICAL

03:17

PHRASES, THEY SAID THIS WAS THIS

03:18

KIND OF A CRIME.

03:19

THIS IS HOW WE KNOW HE DID IT.

03:21

THIS IS WHAT WE'RE GOING TO SHOW

03:23

YOU ABOUT HOW HE DID IT.

03:24

THERE'S GOING TO BE ABSOLUTELY

03:25

NO DOUBT IN YOUR MIND.

03:26

IT'S GOING TO BE BEYOND A

03:28

REASONABLE DOUBT IN ALL OF YOUR

03:29

MINDS THAT HE DID THIS.

03:32

THEY PRESENTED IT AS BOTH AS A

03:34

SERIOUS CASE AND AN OPEN AND

03:36

SHUT CASE.

03:38

I SAY THAT, THE PLATONIC IDEAL

03:42

OF EVERY ARGUMENT.

03:44

THE DEFENSE SIDE WAS MUCH MORE

03:48

BAROQUE, A DIGRESSION FROM TODD

03:52

BLANCHE ABOUT HOW YOU'LL HEAR US

03:54

DESCRIBE HIM AS PRESIDENT TRUMP.

03:56

THAT WAS A TITLE HE EARNED.

03:57

HE WAS RUNNING THE COUNTRY.

03:59

HE KEPT GOING BACK TO THINGS

04:00

LIKE THAT.

04:02

AFTER THE JUDGE INSTRUCTED THE

04:05

JURORS THAT THE DEFENSE DOES NOT

04:08

HAVE TO PROVE THE INNOCENCE OF

04:10

DONALD TRUMP, THEY JUST NEED TO

04:12

MAKE SURE THE PROSECUTION

04:13

DOESN'T PROVE WITHOUT A

04:15

REASONABLE DOUBT THAT HE DID IT,

04:17

BLANCHE, IN FACT, ADVANCED A

04:19

WHOLE COUNTERFACTUAL.

04:20

THOSE INVOICES FROM MICHAEL

04:22

COHEN WERE REALLY ABOUT A LEGAL

04:25

RETAINER FOR HIS LEGAL SERVICES,

04:27

AND THERE WAS NO SEXUAL

04:30

ENCOUNTER BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP

04:32

AND STORMY DANIELS AND ALL OF

04:35

THESE OTHER COUNTERNARRATIVES

04:37

THAT MIGHT EXPLAIN THE EVIDENCE

04:39

THAT, AGAIN, NOT JUST CONNECTING

04:40

THE DOTS, KIND OF A BAROQUE,

04:43

DETAILED, ELABORATE STORY WITH A

04:44

LOT OF EMOTION ATTACHED TO IT

04:47

THAT THE JURY WAS EXPECTED TO

04:48

BUY INTO AS MUCH WITH THEIR

04:50

HEART AS THEIR MINDS.

04:52

A MUCH MORE CEREBRAL, SIMPLE

04:55

CASE FROM THE PROSECUTION.

04:57

>> RACHEL, CAN YOU DESCRIBE

04:59

DONALD TRUMP'S AFFECT,

05:00

PARTICULARLY WHEN DAVID PECKER

05:02

CAME IN AND WHEN HE WAS

05:03

TESTIFYING OR WHEN HE WAS BEING

05:08

DESCRIBED BY THE PROSECUTION?

05:10

>> Reporter: YES, AND I SHOULD

05:13

SAY, IN THE COURTROOM PRESIDENT

05:15

TRUMP'S BACK IS TO ALL OF US

05:17

SITTING AS OBSERVERS IN THE

05:18

COURTROOM.

05:18

THERE ARE MONITORS THAT ARE

05:20

MOUNTED IN THE COURTROOM WHERE

05:22

WE CAN SEE A FORWARD-FACING VIEW

05:24

FROM HIM, BUT IT'S A LITTLE

05:25

OCCLUDED.

05:26

IT MAY BE THE PEOPLE IN THE

05:29

OVERFLOW ROOM LOOKING AT THE

05:30

MONITORS MIGHT HAVE HAD A BETTER

05:31

LOOK.

05:32

FROM WHERE I WAS SITTING, HE

05:37

SEEMED BASICALLY INERT.

05:38

HE KIND OF SLUMPED HIS SHOULDERS

05:41

AND WAS KIND OF, I'M A SLUMP

05:44

SHOULDERED PERSON.

05:46

HE WAS SLUMPED AT TIMES.

05:49

WHEN MR. PECKER TESTIFIED, I

05:52

NOTICED HE WAS LEANING HEAVILY

05:53

ON THE DESK.

05:54

I DIDN'T SEE HIM AS PARTICULARLY

05:56

ANIMATED.

05:56

AGAIN, I MAY NOT HAVE BEEN IN

05:58

THE BEST POSITION TO OBSERVE

06:01

THAT CLOSELY.

06:02

I'VE SEEN HIM IN PERSON IN MY

06:04

LIFE A FEW TIMES.

06:06

I WOULD SAY SEEING HIM GO UP AND

06:09

DOWN THE AISLE, SEEING HIM WALK

06:12

PAST ME IN THE AISLE SEVERAL

06:14

TIMES INCLUDING A RECESS, I

06:16

WOULD SAY HE SEEMS THINNER THAN

06:19

I'VE SEEN HIM IN THE PAST.

06:22

HE SEEMS CONSIDERABLY OLDER AND

06:26

HE SEEMS ANNOYED, RESIGNED,

06:28

MAYBE ANGRY.

06:29

HE SEEMS LIKE A MAN WHO IS

06:31

MISERABLE TO BE HERE.

06:32

I'M NO BODY LANGUAGE EXPERT.

06:36

THIS IS JUST MY OBSERVATION.

06:38

HE ZOO SEEMED OLD AND TIRED AND

06:40

MAD.

06:41

I WOULD PROBABLY SEEM THAT WAY,

06:42

TOO.

06:43

>> WHEN HE CAME OUT, HE WAS

06:47

NOTABLY ANNOYED, THIS SHOULDN'T

06:49

BE HAPPENING AND HE REPEATED A

06:51

LOT OF THINGS THAT ARE

06:52

FACT-BASED.

06:53

WE CUT OUT OF IT AND CORRECTED

06:55

IT, SAYING THIS WAS A SIMPLE

06:57

BOOK KEEPING MATTER.

06:59

HE SEEMED REALLY ANGRY, ANNOYED

07:02

AND ANGRY.

07:02

>> YEAH.

07:04

I THINK THAT'S RIGHT.

07:05

YOU'LL OBVIOUSLY SEE IT AND HEAR

07:07

IT WHEN YOU COME BACK AND YOU'RE

07:09

PREPARING FOR YOUR SPECIAL

07:10

TONIGHT WHICH WE'LL TALK ABOUT.

07:12

I'M VERY CURIOUS ABOUT DAVID

07:14

PECKER AS WELL.

07:15

HE WAS ALSO DESCRIBED BY SOME OF

07:17

THE FOLKS IN THE ROOM AS SEEMING

07:18

OLD.

07:19

THERE'S THE FACTS THAT A WITNESS

07:21

GIVES AND THERE'S ALSO THE WAY

07:23

THEY PRESENTED.

07:25

DID THEY SEEM RELUCTANT?

07:26

ARE THEY CREDIBLE?

07:28

WHAT ARE YOUR OBSERVATIONS?

07:30

I KNOW YOU'RE NOT A BODY

07:31

LANGUAGE EXPERT.

07:33

I'M ASKING ABOUT YOUR

07:36

OBSERVATIONS ABOUT DAVID PECKER.

07:37

>>

07:38

>> Reporter: IT'S INTERESTING.

07:39

WE DIDN'T GET A TON OF TESTIMONY

07:41

FROM MR. PECKER.

07:43

THE PROCEEDINGS ENDED AT

07:47

12:30EST EARN TIME.

07:49

THERE WAS A LONG BREAK, THERE

07:51

WAS AN INTERRUPTION BECAUSE THE

07:53

JUDGE TOLD THE JURORS THEY COULD

07:55

HAVE WRITING IMPLEMENTS AND PADS

07:57

OF PAPER IF THEY WANTED.

07:59

HE FORGOT TO ASK THEM IF THEY

08:01

WANTED THEM.

08:02

THERE WAS ANOTHER INTERRUPTION

08:04

WHERE EVERYONE GOT SCHOOL

08:04

SUPPLIES.

08:05

THAT ATE UP A LOT OF TIME SO WE

08:07

DIDN'T GET A LOT FROM MR.

08:08

PECKER.

08:09

MY IMPRESSIONS OF HIM -- YOU'LL

08:11

SEE IT IN THE TRANSCRIPT LATER

08:12

TODAY.

08:13

HE DESCRIBED HIMSELF AS 72 YEARS

08:15

OLD.

08:16

HE'S NOW SELF-EMPLOYED AS A

08:18

CONSULTANT INCLUDING CONSULTING

08:19

FOR THE COMPANY THAT HE USED TO

08:21

RUN, BUT HE DOESN'T RUN THAT

08:22

COMPANY ANYMORE.

08:23

HE DID SAY HE WAS AT THIS

08:25

PROCEEDING UNDER SUBPOENA AND HE

08:27

HAD A LAWYER PRESENT IN THE

08:29

COURTROOM.

08:30

HE'S A PHYSICALLY SMALL MAN,

08:31

SORT OF SLIGHT.

08:33

HE LOOKS JUST LIKE HE DOES IN

08:36

HIS PICTURES, BUT HE'S SMALL,

08:38

HE'S SOFT SPOKEN.

08:40

I WOULD DESCRIBE HIS SPEAKING

08:42

STYLE, THE WAY HE ANSWERED

08:45

QUESTIONS FROM THE PROSECUTOR AS

08:47

SOMEWHAT ELLIPTICAL.

08:48

MEANING HE WOULD BE ASKED A

08:52

DIRECT QUESTION, HE WOULD GIVE

08:54

YOU THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE

08:55

ROOM.

08:56

THAT MEANT THAT THE PROSECUTOR

08:57

HAD TO ASK HIM THREE OR FOUR

09:00

TIMES WERE YOU ULTIMATELY IN

09:02

CHARGE OF WHAT STORIES WERE

09:04

PUBLISHED IN YOUR PUBLICATIONS

09:06

OR WHAT STORIES WERE NOT

09:09

PUBLISHED, THE PROSECUTE HAD TO

09:10

SAY, WERE YOU THE ONE.

09:13

HE DIDN'T USE THE WORDS THE BUCK

09:15

STOPPED WITH ME.

09:16

THE STORIES THAT WERE NOT

09:18

PUBLISHED, THAT WAS ULTIMATELY

09:18

UP TO ME.

09:20

TOOK HIM A WHILE TO GET THERE.

09:22

WE'LL SEE HOW IT GOES IN

09:23

FORTHCOMING DAYS.

09:24

IT MAY TAKE A WHILE TO GET

09:29

THROUGH DIRECT EXAMINATION WITH

09:31

MR. PECKER.

09:32

>> FOR WHATEVER PROFESSIONAL

09:34

TRAINING YOU MAY NOT HAVE, YOUR

09:36

KEEN OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYTICAL

09:38

SKILLS ARE BEYOND INTACT.

09:41

RACHEL MADDOW, WE'RE A LITTLE

Rate This
★
★
★
★
★

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Tags associés
Courtroom AtmosphereDonald TrumpRachel MaddowTrial ObservationsLegal ProceedingsMSNBC CoverageProsecution StrategyDefense PresentationWitness TestimonyDavid PeckerStormy DanielsCelebrity Trial
Avez-vous besoin d'un résumé en français?