New Fani Willis Witnesses, and the Power of Drudge, with Aronberg, Davis, Moody, and Weinstein

Megyn Kelly
5 Mar 2024100:07

Summary

TLDRIn this episode, we delve into the mysteries surrounding media mogul Matt Drudge, the reclusive founder of The Drudge Report. We explore Drudge's unprecedented impact on journalism, particularly his role in breaking the Monica Lewinsky story, which catapulted him to fame and fundamentally changed digital media. Featuring insights from Tucker Carlson and a journey into Drudge's enigmatic life, including speculation on his current whereabouts and his abrupt shift in political stance during the 2020 election, this episode unravels the layers of a figure who continues to influence the media landscape while remaining an enigma.

Takeaways

  • 🎙 Megan Kelly hosts 'The Megan Kelly Show' and discusses political and legal news, focusing on Super Tuesday and the 2024 election dynamics between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
  • 🔍 The show delves into court proceedings and updates on several cases involving Donald Trump, highlighting the significance of these legal battles in the political landscape.
  • 🏛 A major topic is the Supreme Court decision's impact on Donald Trump's eligibility for future elections, especially concerning the insurrectionist clause and its interpretation.
  • ⚖ Discussions include insights from Mike Davis and Dave Aronberg on various legal and political issues, emphasizing the complex interplay between law and politics.
  • 📊 Megan Kelly explores the role of the media and public figures in shaping political narratives and opinions, illustrating the power of media platforms in influencing public discourse.
  • 💌 The show covers the financial implications of legal challenges for Donald Trump, including the requirement to post significant bonds related to civil judgments against him.
  • 🗳 Voter engagement and the influence of legal and political developments on voter behavior are highlighted, pointing to the broader implications of these events on democracy.
  • 📺 The podcast 'Finding Matt Drudge' is discussed, focusing on the elusive media figure Matt Drudge and his impact on news aggregation and political reporting.
  • 🀔 The conversation explores Matt Drudge's personal history, his rise to prominence through the Drudge Report, and his reclusive nature, alongside the evolving media landscape.
  • 🔎 An emphasis is placed on the importance of media figures in shaping public opinion and political outcomes, underscoring the ongoing relevance of platforms like the Drudge Report.

Q & A

  • Why is Matt Drudge considered influential in the media?

    -Matt Drudge is considered influential in the media because his website, the Drudge Report, has been pivotal in aggregating news stories and influencing media coverage and public perception for over 25 years. His site has been a go-to source for news, often breaking significant stories like the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

  • What led to the launch of Fox News' Special Report?

    -The launch of Fox News' Special Report was directly influenced by Matt Drudge breaking the Monica Lewinsky story. This event signaled the importance of the story and the need for dedicated news coverage, prompting Fox News to start the show earlier than planned.

  • How did Matt Drudge reportedly turn against Donald Trump?

    -Matt Drudge reportedly turned against Donald Trump due to a combination of policy disagreements, particularly on immigration, personal grievances from perceived negative comments by Trump's White House staff, and a desire to maintain his independent and contrarian stance in the media.

  • What is known about Matt Drudge's personal life and residence?

    -Matt Drudge is known for his reclusiveness and desire for privacy. He has properties in various locations and prefers secluded places. Recently, a house he owned, characterized by its seclusion and privacy, was put up for sale, underscoring his preference for staying out of the public eye.

  • What was the significance of the Monica Lewinsky scandal in relation to Matt Drudge?

    -The Monica Lewinsky scandal was significant for Matt Drudge as it marked his rise to prominence in the media. He was the first to report on the affair between Lewinsky and President Bill Clinton, a story that major news outlets were hesitant to publish at the time, showcasing the power of the internet in breaking news.

  • How has the internet's evolution affected the Drudge Report's influence?

    -The evolution of the internet, particularly the rise of social media and algorithm-driven news feeds, has somewhat diminished the Drudge Report's influence. While still significant, the site's reliance on manual aggregation and curation has faced competition from real-time, personalized news dissemination on social media platforms.

  • What distinguishes the Drudge Report from other news sources?

    -The Drudge Report distinguishes itself from other news sources through its manual aggregation and curation by Matt Drudge, offering a unique selection of news stories based on his personal judgment rather than algorithms, providing readers with a distinct editorial perspective.

  • Has Matt Drudge's approach to privacy impacted his professional relationships?

    -Yes, Matt Drudge's approach to privacy and reclusiveness has impacted his professional relationships. His desire for anonymity and control over his personal information has led to limited public appearances and interactions, and even strained relationships with collaborators when privacy concerns arose.

  • Why did Matt Drudge reportedly react emotionally to inquiries about his personal life?

    -Matt Drudge reportedly reacted emotionally to inquiries about his personal life due to his strong desire for privacy and perhaps past experiences of betrayal or misuse of personal information. His reaction indicates the importance he places on maintaining control over his private life.

  • What does the current interest in Monica Lewinsky as a public figure indicate about media and culture?

    -The current interest in Monica Lewinsky as a public figure indicates a shift in media and culture towards reevaluating past events and figures through a contemporary lens, recognizing complexities in narratives and often redefining individuals' roles and contributions beyond their most infamous moments.

Outlines

00:00

😀 Super Tuesday Commentary

Megan Kelly opens her show with a nod to Super Tuesday, humorously referencing her time at Fox and her colleague Brett Baier. She discusses the predictability of Joe Biden and Donald Trump dominating the nominations unless unforeseen interventions occur. Kelly shifts focus to legal battles, particularly mentioning the Fanny Willis disqualification case, which implicates Donald Trump, and highlights major legal proceedings across various states. She emphasizes the strategic political maneuverings behind these legal actions.

05:04

🔍 Supreme Court Rulings Impact on Trump

The discussion delves into the Supreme Court's decision that states cannot unilaterally remove alleged insurrectionists from ballots, significantly benefiting Trump. They dissect the legal implications and historical precedents affecting Trump's eligibility to run for office, touching on the specifics of legal statutes and the ongoing political and legal strategies employed by both Democrats and Republicans to influence the 2024 election outcome.

10:04

🏛 Trump's Legal Battles and Presidential Immunity

The conversation pivots to Trump’s legal challenges, particularly focusing on the judicial system's handling and timing of these cases. They speculate about the potential outcomes and strategies of the legal processes affecting Trump, including the significant role of the Supreme Court in these matters. The discussion also critiques the perceived biases and procedural tactics within the judiciary and the broader political implications.

15:06

📉 Trump's Influence and Legal Strategy

Debating Trump's legal and political strategies, the dialogue examines how these might impact his 2024 campaign. They discuss the interplay between Trump's legal challenges, his campaign's tactics, and the broader political narratives being shaped by these events. The discussion critically assesses the motivations and implications of the actions taken by various legal and political actors in this unfolding drama.

20:06

🚚 High-Stakes Political and Legal Maneuvering

The narrative shifts to the high-stakes legal and political maneuvering surrounding Trump's potential 2024 candidacy. The speakers delve into the tactical decisions by both Trump’s team and his opponents, reflecting on the intense legal battles and their ramifications on the presidential race. They contemplate the strategic planning behind trial dates and judicial decisions, emphasizing the intersection of law and politics in this contentious period.

25:08

👩‍⚖ Judicial Decisions and Political Consequences

Exploring the judicial landscape, the discussion centers on how various court decisions and legal interpretations might affect Trump’s 2024 presidential run. The conversation critically assesses the roles of judges, legal precedents, and the constitutional debates playing out in the courts, highlighting the complex interplay between legal judgments and political strategy as the election approaches.

30:10

🗳 Election Strategy and Legal Controversies

The focus turns to the intertwined legal controversies and election strategies defining Trump's path to the 2024 election. The speakers debate the potential impact of ongoing legal cases on Trump's campaign, analyzing the strategies employed by both sides of the political aisle to leverage these legal battles in the broader electoral context, underscoring the contentious nature of the political and legal tactics being employed.

35:10

🀯 Media and Legal Spectacle in Trump's Campaign

As the discussion progresses, attention is drawn to the media's role in shaping the narrative around Trump’s legal challenges and his political maneuvers. The speakers delve into the spectacle created by the intertwined narratives of Trump’s legal battles and his political ambitions, offering insights into how these dynamics are played out in the public domain and reflected in media coverage.

40:11

💌 Financial and Legal Pressures on Trump

The conversation addresses the financial and legal pressures facing Trump, including significant bond requirements related to ongoing legal proceedings. The speakers ponder the financial strategies Trump might employ to navigate these challenges, touching on the implications of his assets and potential fundraising or financial maneuvers to meet legal obligations.

45:14

🏢 Asset Management and Legal Strategy in Trump’s Orbit

Delving into Trump's asset management and legal strategy, the narrative examines how Trump's financial resources and legal tactics are intertwined with his political ambitions. The discussion contemplates the potential for asset liquidation or strategic financial moves to counterbalance the legal and financial hurdles Trump faces, all within the broader context of his 2024 election campaign.

50:16

🎙 Monica Lewinsky and the Drudge Report

Transitioning from Trump's legal narrative, the discussion segues into the origins of the Drudge Report and its impact on media, particularly highlighting the role it played in breaking the Monica Lewinsky scandal. They reflect on Matt Drudge's media influence, his reclusive nature, and how his report changed the landscape of news reporting and public discourse around high-profile political scandals.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Matt drudge

Matt Drudge is the creator of the Drudge Report, a news aggregation website that has had a significant impact on the media landscape, particularly in conservative circles. Drudge is known for his reclusive nature and for having been a pioneer in online news aggregation. His website famously broke the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which is discussed in the script as a pivotal moment that elevated the Drudge Report's status and influence in the news industry.

💡Drudge Report

The Drudge Report is an aggregation website that compiles news from various sources, often highlighting conservative viewpoints and stories. It gained prominence for its role in breaking the Monica Lewinsky scandal in the late 1990s. The website is known for its simple layout and has been a key player in shaping the news narrative, particularly among conservative media outlets.

💡News aggregation

News aggregation refers to the process of collecting news from different sources and presenting them in a single location. The Drudge Report is cited in the script as an early example of an online news aggregator, focusing on compiling links to various news stories of interest, particularly those aligning with conservative perspectives.

💡Monica Lewinsky scandal

The Monica Lewinsky scandal involved an affair between President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern. Matt Drudge's Drudge Report was the first to break the story online, which led to widespread media coverage and eventually to the impeachment of President Clinton. The script highlights this scandal as a turning point for online news and the rise of the Drudge Report.

💡Online media

Online media refers to content available via the internet, including news websites, blogs, and social media platforms. The script discusses how Matt Drudge and the Drudge Report played a pioneering role in the early days of online media by using the internet to break news stories and influence the media narrative.

💡Algorithmic news

Algorithmic news refers to news content that is curated and distributed by algorithms based on user preferences and behavior. The script contrasts this modern approach to news dissemination with Matt Drudge's method of manually selecting and highlighting news stories on the Drudge Report, emphasizing the value of human editorial judgment.

💡Conservative media

Conservative media refers to media outlets and platforms that promote conservative viewpoints and ideologies. The Drudge Report is mentioned in the script as having been a key figure in conservative media, influencing the narrative and coverage of news stories from a conservative perspective.

💡Reclusive nature

The script describes Matt Drudge as being reclusive, highlighting his tendency to avoid public appearances and media interviews. This elusive behavior contributes to the mystique surrounding Drudge and the intrigue about his personal life and the operation of the Drudge Report.

💡Influence on news

The script discusses the significant impact that Matt Drudge and the Drudge Report have had on the news industry, particularly in terms of breaking major news stories and influencing the agenda of conservative media outlets. Drudge's ability to highlight specific stories has often shifted media attention and shaped public discourse.

💡Media landscape

The media landscape refers to the overall environment of media outlets and platforms, including traditional media (such as newspapers and television) and new media (such as online news sites and social media). The script explores how Matt Drudge and the Drudge Report have been influential in changing the media landscape by pioneering online news aggregation and influencing the way news is consumed and distributed.

Highlights

Megan Kelly discusses the influence of the Drudge Report on conservative media and her personal interaction with Matt Drudge.

Chris Moody and Jamie Weinstein launch a podcast titled 'Finding Matt Drudge' to explore the mysterious figure behind the influential Drudge Report.

The podcast delves into Drudge's beginnings, his pivotal role in breaking the Monica Lewinsky scandal, and his impact on the digital media landscape.

Discussion on Matt Drudge's reclusiveness, his avoidance of public attention, and the mystery of his current involvement with the Drudge Report.

Exploration of why Matt Drudge might have turned against Donald Trump in 2020, including speculation on immigration policies and personal slights.

Insight into Matt Drudge's work habits, his selection of news stories, and the unique appeal of the Drudge Report in the era of algorithm-driven news.

Monica Lewinsky's resurgence in the public eye and her transformation into a modern-day icon, juxtaposed with her infamous past.

The podcast 'Finding Matt Drudge' aims to uncover the reasons behind Drudge's shift in political support and his current status in the media world.

Analysis of Drudge's strategic news aggregation and its significant influence on the narrative of conservative news outlets.

Investigation into the speculated decline in the Drudge Report's influence amidst the rise of social media and changing digital news consumption habits.

The podcast reveals Drudge's early career moves, including his time at CBS and how he leveraged discarded Nielsen ratings for news scoops.

Discussion on Drudge's secretive lifestyle, including his efforts to maintain privacy and the rare sightings of him in public spaces.

Reflections on the changing landscape of media and journalism, highlighting Drudge's role in challenging traditional news gatekeeping.

Consideration of the Drudge Report's lasting legacy and its ability to adapt in an ever-evolving digital media environment.

The podcast's approach to unraveling the enigma of Matt Drudge through interviews, firsthand accounts, and attempts to contact Drudge directly.

Transcripts

00:00

hey everyone I'm Megan Kelly welcome to

00:01

the Megan Kelly show and happy super

00:04

Tuesday remember that do you guys know

00:06

that SNL reference I used to do this on

00:08

the air at Fox and Brett Bar be look at

00:10

me like what are you doing and then he

00:12

like he learned to love super Tuesday ww

00:16

it's really not that super it's kind of

00:17

super boring uh 2024 a very different

00:20

election year from the prior super

00:23

Tuesdays we know President Joe Biden and

00:25

former president Donald Trump are going

00:26

to dominate tonight and they're going to

00:27

be the nominees the only thing that's

00:29

going to stop them is somehow their own

00:31

parties intervening to stop them or you

00:34

know the big man upstairs stepping in to

00:37

say you won't be around in November God

00:39

forbid I'm just saying it's going to

00:41

happen these two are the nominees we're

00:43

going to let you know officially what

00:44

happens um tomorrow but that's not where

00:46

the real news is today when it comes to

00:48

this presidential race uh instead it is

00:50

in the courts and we have major updates

00:53

in several of the proceedings including

00:55

the fanny Willis disqualification case

00:58

in which not one but two two new

01:00

Witnesses have just come forward and the

01:03

implications for former president Donald

01:05

Trump's trial there as well as continued

01:07

Fallout in the Supreme Court decision

01:09

yesterday which we and others have been

01:11

pouring over to figure out just how good

01:13

it is for Donald Trump and it turns out

01:15

it's even better than we thought uh plus

01:17

we've got trial updates now out of New

01:20

York

01:21

DC and more there are a lot of

01:25

maneuverings going on behind the scenes

01:28

by the Democrats to make these things

01:30

happen faster and of course by team

01:33

Trump to slow them down and then by the

01:35

media to express outrage in response to

01:38

any Trump win but then you knew that

01:40

joining me now to kick things off today

01:42

is Mike Davis he's founder of the

01:44

article 3 project and Dave aronburg

01:46

state attorney for pal Beach County

01:48

Florida where Mara Lago is located you

01:51

can find Mike on Fox Dave on MSNBC but

01:54

together only right here on the Megan

01:57

Kelly

01:58

show don't miss a moment subscribe to

02:02

this show on YouTube and follow me on

02:04

insta Facebook and X let's discuss a

02:07

crucial aspect of your Financial Health

02:10

your credit report are you getting

02:11

stressed out just as I mentioned those

02:13

words stay with me it's time to face a

02:16

hard truth your credit report could be

02:18

suffering due to unfounded reputation

02:21

damaging claims it may not all be true

02:24

these are the kind of claims that could

02:26

really hurt you but might not hold up

02:28

under rigorous scrutiny and that is

02:31

where Lexington Law Firm comes into play

02:33

for less than a 100 bucks Lexington Law

02:36

Will Champion your cause using a

02:38

comprehensive arsenal of consumer

02:40

protection laws to fight for your best

02:43

credit report do you know you're about

02:44

to apply for something going to get a

02:46

mortgage you're going to get a car loan

02:48

Now's the Time to look into this

02:50

Lexington Law is fully equipped to

02:52

challenge those exploitative creditors

02:54

and aggressive debt collectors who

02:55

obstruct your financial path go and

02:58

visit lexingtonlaw.com for a

03:00

complimentary credit assessment let

03:02

their experts place your credit under

03:04

the microscope ensuring that it reflects

03:06

your true Financial story remember to

03:08

mention that Megan referred you at

03:11

lexingtonlaw.com Empower yourself with

03:14

the right team on your

03:18

side guys welcome back great to have you

03:21

um we'll get to Fanny and a will Fanny

03:24

in a Willis Fanny in a minute but I want

03:26

to start with the Supreme Court decision

03:29

yesterday

03:30

uh 9 to Z that Trump um should stay on

03:35

the ballot in Colorado and this will

03:38

affect him in all the states anybody

03:40

trying to kick him off is going to have

03:41

to deal with this but as it turns out

03:42

there was more in the decision and it it

03:45

just broken when we went to air

03:47

yesterday then we really knew and um

03:51

I'll I'll paraphrase it from Andy

03:54

McCarthy's National Review piece where

03:57

he said okay it's for sure they held

04:01

that states are not empowered by the

04:03

14th Amendment to remove alleged

04:06

insurrectionists from the ballot that is

04:09

clear all nine agreed on that states

04:12

can't do it can't have the patchwork of

04:15

Colorado finding differently than you

04:17

know Georgia Florida Etc and then five

04:21

of the justices went on to say the only

04:23

conservative who didn't join in this is

04:24

Amy Cony

04:26

Barrett that this insurrectionist piece

04:29

of the the 14th amendment can only be

04:32

enforced against someone who's been

04:35

convicted of an Insurrection who has

04:38

been convicted of an Insurrection and

04:41

that is the piece that drove the three

04:43

liberals nuts so they wrote their own

04:46

decision soda mayor Kagan and katangi

04:49

brown Jackson saying you went too far I

04:52

read this to the audience yesterday

04:54

there was no reason to get to that you

04:55

shouldn't have gotten to that and the

04:57

reason they're so mad about it Mike is

04:59

that what this does is it makes it

05:03

impossible for congress really at any

05:08

point at any time that's going to affect

05:12

Trump to invoke this Clause against him

05:15

again because the the majority of the

05:17

Supreme Court said this piece of the

05:20

Constitution the 14th Amendment saying

05:21

you can't run if you if you're an

05:23

insurrectionist can only be enforced

05:26

against someone convicted of an

05:28

Insurrection and Trump hasn't been

05:30

convicted he was impeached for things in

05:32

the in the house he wasn't found guilty

05:34

in the Senate he hasn't been indicted

05:37

for Insurrection

05:39

anywhere and so this really was even

05:41

better for Trump than uh at least we

05:43

first thought when we looked at it

05:44

yesterday what do you make of it well

05:46

the Supreme Court's exactly right and

05:48

they're following a predent from more

05:50

than 150 years AG ago called the

05:53

Griffin's case and it was it's not a

05:55

controlling presedent it's a persuasive

05:57

presedent where were then chief Justice

06:00

salmon Chase uh writing circuit as a

06:04

circuit uh judge not a Supreme Court

06:06

Justice uh decided the case uh where it

06:09

was uh the these exact patterns where

06:12

someone was uh they were trying to

06:13

disqualify a Confederate who engaged at

06:16

Insurrection or rebellion and uh Salman

06:20

Chase said no in order to do this

06:21

Congress has to pass a Federal Criminal

06:24

statute for Insurrection or Rebellion

06:26

with a disqualification clause which

06:29

which Congress promptly did and it's on

06:32

the books now the utmost updated version

06:35

was

06:36

1948 and it's still in the books and if

06:38

Jack Smith or the Democrats want to get

06:41

rid of trump if they if they they if

06:43

they fear American voters and they don't

06:45

want American voters to decide the

06:47

election on November 5th 2024 then Jack

06:50

SMI Smith better get moving he better

06:53

charge Trump with Insurrection under

06:55

this statute he better get a federal

06:57

jury grand jury to indict a federal jury

07:00

to find guilt guilt unanimously with

07:02

evidence Beyond a re Reasonable Doubt a

07:04

federal judge to convict and that

07:05

conviction upheld on appeal that's the

07:07

only way you can disqualify under

07:09

section three of the 14th Amendment you

07:11

have to ask yourself this the January 6

07:14

Democrats and the Biden justice

07:16

department have spent tens of millions

07:18

of dollars hunting for Insurrection

07:21

evidence on Trump and they charge Trump

07:24

with many other things but they couldn't

07:25

charge Trump with Insurrection because

07:27

the evidence doesn't exist how many

07:30

insurrectionist go unarmed and into into

07:33

a nation's capital get to the senate

07:35

floor of the nation's capital and walk

07:37

through velvet ropes follow police

07:40

Direction uh take selfies and don't burn

07:42

down the damn place January 6th was a

07:44

lawful protest permitted by the National

07:47

Park Service that devolved into a riot

07:50

period full stop and what what um what

07:55

Andy says Dave is that this means that

07:59

Congressional Democrats would not be

08:02

able to on the next January 6th of 2025

08:06

right after we've had the election you

08:08

know that was the day they certified the

08:09

vote Mike Pence counted the votes they

08:12

would not be able to refuse to ratify a

08:15

trump Victory on the grounds that he is

08:18

an insurrectionist the Supreme Court

08:20

just took that away from them and this

08:22

is one of the many reasons why some on

08:25

the left are very angry at the Supreme

08:27

Court for this decision and in

08:29

particular for that additional step the

08:32

five conservatives

08:35

took well first off goodby with you

08:37

Megan it's nice to see Mike so happy for

08:41

once I can see why he's got two he's got

08:44

two really good Supreme Court decisions

08:47

uh under his belt plus good polling

08:48

numbers so congrats Mike this is your

08:50

house on period and uh

08:53

I I I tell my Democratic friends this is

08:56

what you get when you listen to Susan

08:59

sandon for your political advice and end

09:01

up voting for Jill Stein you get a

09:03

supreme court that doesn't know the idea

09:06

of judicial restraint so instead of just

09:08

ruling on the issue in front of them

09:09

they went further and the one thing I

09:11

would disagree with Megan is and I have

09:13

a lot of respect for judge McCarthy but

09:14

I didn't see that in the opinion where

09:16

you have to have a conviction for

09:19

Insurrection before you can bounce

09:21

someone from the B and I I read this and

09:24

the uh and the concurring opinions and

09:26

here here's what uh how I interpret it

09:28

is that what the Supreme Court said is

09:31

that only Congress can uh enforce

09:35

section three of the 14th Amendment now

09:37

there's nothing in section five that

09:38

says it's exclusive to Congress but the

09:41

Supreme Court said only Congress so if

09:44

that means that there is someone who did

09:46

engage in Insurrection and was convicted

09:49

of insurrection that State uh States

09:51

cannot bounce that person off the ballot

09:53

only Congress can establish a mechanism

09:56

and if Congress doesn't establish a

09:58

mechanism then tough luck plus well wait

10:00

let me just let me just answer that

10:02

you're right I mean I simplified it for

10:03

the audience but what Andy is saying is

10:07

that right now the only existing statute

10:11

that could be used is the penal law

10:13

against Insurrection that's that's the

10:15

only law in the books right now that

10:16

could be used and Trump has not been

10:19

charged as an insurrectionist so yes I

10:21

going forward sure they could change the

10:24

law but you tell me how in a republican

10:27

controlled house and we all remember

10:29

School holl Rock it's got to go through

10:31

the house and the Senate and be signed

10:33

by the president to become a law they're

10:35

going to change the law between now and

10:37

November oh there is a less than zero

10:41

percent chance they're going to do that

10:43

there is not going to be a change

10:44

Congress is not going to act Congress is

10:45

going to do what they're best at which

10:47

is do nothing so what this court

10:49

decision did was to also tell federal

10:52

courts that you don't have the power to

10:55

disqualify a federal candidate from

10:58

office because of insurrection even if

11:01

they're convicted of an Insurrection

11:02

it's going to be up to Congress to

11:04

create a mechanism to do that and so

11:07

that takes the power away from State

11:09

officials and judges until Congress acts

11:12

so that's why it was such a broad ruling

11:13

such a powerful ruling by these juses

11:16

and why even Justice Amy Cony Barrett

11:18

said hey let's not go this far let's use

11:20

some judicial restraint but Katie Bar

11:22

the Door Mike's shaking his head no why

11:26

well I would say I think David is right

11:27

that you can have a component to this

11:30

because the predecessor to this criminal

11:32

statute on Insurrection or Rebellion

11:33

there was a civil statute so it could be

11:35

either civil set up by Congress or

11:37

criminal so that's uh you know that well

11:41

according to the Griffins case it has to

11:42

be criminal but there was a civil

11:44

component to this um so you know that's

11:47

he he could be he could be right there I

11:49

would say this on could Congress right

11:52

now could Federal prosecutors right now

11:55

get rid of people who engaged in

11:56

Insurrection and the answer is yes they

11:58

would have to be charged those

12:00

insurrectionists would have to be

12:01

charged under this Federal Criminal

12:03

statute for Insurrection or Rebellion

12:04

with a disqualification Clause that's

12:07

already on the books Congress wouldn't

12:08

have to do anything new it's just the

12:11

the Biden justice department would

12:12

actually have to come up with evidence

12:15

of insurrectional rebellion well like

12:17

Mike like take take for example some of

12:19

those j6 defendants who actually were

12:21

charged with Insurrection and found

12:24

guilty I don't know if they were charged

12:26

with Insurrection I think they were

12:27

charged with seditious conspir which is

12:29

oh right you're right you're right

12:31

you're right so that wouldn't do it so

12:33

but if you were to have a January 6th uh

12:36

defendant charged with Insurrection and

12:39

convicted of insurrection the Supreme

12:41

Court has basically said those people

12:42

are not going to be

12:44

president

12:46

correct so you know Dave maybe if you go

12:49

after hornman or lecturn guy uh my two

12:52

favorites for president uh you know you

12:54

could you could take them out with that

12:55

statute well Megan Mike Mike is right

12:59

that no one has been charged with

13:00

Insurrection they've been charged with

13:01

sistic conspiracy which is different but

13:04

now correct if I'm wrong Mike I the

13:06

statute that says that Insurrection is a

13:08

crime contains a section that says you

13:11

cannot run again I thought that was what

13:13

was in the 14th Amendment section three

13:15

the statute actually prohibits you from

13:17

running again if you violate stat on the

13:21

the definely lost my audience just give

13:24

me the bottom line without doing

13:26

in-depth statutory analysis I mean so if

13:29

if you want to disqualify for

13:30

Insurrection or Rebellion there is a

13:32

statute on the books a Federal Criminal

13:34

statute on the books right now the

13:37

latest version is was 1948 it's been on

13:39

the books for a long time you charge

13:41

under Insurrection or rebellion and

13:43

there is a disqualification provision in

13:46

that statute so if you're convicted of

13:48

insurrection or Rebellion under that

13:50

statute you are

13:52

disqualified okay but that hasn't

13:54

happened to Donald Trump that's the

13:55

operative point and while they could

13:57

change the law going forward there's

13:58

zero chance that this house controlled

14:01

by the Republicans is going to be on

14:03

board with that so for now Trump is

14:04

protected and not just for now I mean

14:06

all the way through the election and

14:09

potentially you know up to January 6th

14:12

um when you know he's he's if he wins

14:16

he's going to have the vote certified

14:17

and so on all right so that's a very

14:20

good thing for Donald Trump and it's

14:21

very bad for people like Michael ludig

14:25

Lawrence tribe who I mean since this

14:27

idea came up and ludig was one of the

14:29

ones who did it he was you know I mean I

14:31

think it's fair to say he's a respected

14:33

appell at court judge um but this is a

14:36

cockamamy idea and he was put it's not

14:40

like you see Michael luded all over

14:41

cable news on a normal basis but he was

14:44

a star on cable news Lawrence tribe he's

14:48

been been on MSM he's a very hardcore

14:50

anti-trump guy um but here's just a

14:52

flashback of some of the media and the

14:55

experts embracing this wonderful idea

14:58

which as I point out while they were

14:59

split on just how far they went nine out

15:02

of nine did say states are not empowered

15:06

by the 14th Amendment to remove alleged

15:09

insurrectionists from the ballot watch

15:11

this in S8 Colorado is executing its

15:15

state rights to decide who should be on

15:18

their own ballot grounded in the

15:20

Constitutions that language uh in the

15:23

Constitution Jim simply could not be any

15:28

clearer this is a slam dunk the former

15:30

president is not eligible to be

15:32

president again Trump incited and

15:34

therefore engaged in an armed

15:36

Insurrection against the Constitutions

15:38

Trump is indeed ineligible to be

15:39

president Donald Trump engaged in an

15:41

Insurrection against the Constitution

15:44

Donald Trump cannot be president for

15:47

under the Constitution he cannot be our

15:49

president again that engaging an

15:51

Insurrection has disqualified himself

15:53

from holding any future Federal office

15:55

will the Supreme Court agree with

15:57

themselves we're confident the Supreme

15:58

Court will reject that

16:02

claim or not that was courtesy of the

16:05

Washington Free Beacon but they're for

16:07

our audience both guys are

16:09

laughing both lawyers are laughing it is

16:12

kind of funny I mean look we'll see

16:14

whether those experts now go back in and

16:17

say gee even my side ruled against me on

16:20

the critical point I mean Dave it was a

16:22

resounding

16:25

defeat Yeah Boy the hazard of videotape

16:30

you know that it looks like me look like

16:33

me when I said that the Supreme Court

16:34

would deny C in the absolute immunity

16:36

case you know so I've been

16:39

there it's just there's no getting

16:41

around and and that's that's because it

16:42

really was kakami I mean it was a real

16:44

reach and I forget whether what I found

16:47

I remember looking into ludig he's I

16:49

think he's more right leaning but he's a

16:50

never Trumper he's a never Trumper you

16:52

have to when you look at the

16:54

conservative leanings of these judges

16:55

Mike you have to figure out okay it's

16:58

not not enough just to say they're

16:59

conservative and therefore I need to

17:00

take them seriously on an anti-trump

17:02

move you do have to figure out One Step

17:04

Beyond that and I'm sorry to make it all

17:06

B boil down to politics but I mean in

17:08

this case it

17:09

does yeah so judge Michael ludik is a

17:14

total goofball they he lost his mind

17:17

when he got passed over for the Supreme

17:20

Court by George W bush I was in the

17:22

White House at the time he got mad he

17:24

resigned from the bench and he's just

17:26

been a bitter washed up loser for years

17:30

and years and

17:33

years raising his all right go ahead

17:37

here I am defending the Federalist

17:38

Society Ultra conservative uh judge

17:41

judge ludik look here here's the thing

17:43

this wasn't a complete victory for Trump

17:45

at the Supreme Court in that they did

17:47

not address the issue that Trump wanted

17:49

them to address which is whether or not

17:51

he engaged in Insurrection they left

17:53

that to the lower courts and by doing

17:55

that the finding from the lower courts

17:57

is that Trump did did engage in

17:59

Insurrection so where ludic and others

18:01

are coming from is that if you did

18:02

engage in Insurrection the plain meaning

18:05

of the text of the 14th Amendment

18:06

section three says you are disqualified

18:09

for running for office so that's where

18:12

they came from but the Supreme Court

18:13

decided to abandon their textualist

18:15

Roots originalist roots and decide to

18:17

rule um on principles of federalism and

18:20

just common sense that we don't want 50

18:22

states to go in 50 different directions

18:24

there would be chaos all right here's a

18:27

little sample of that Point not to lump

18:29

you in with these people Dave uh from

18:31

reacting to this decision this is per uh

18:34

given to us by the media Research Center

18:36

saw three watch this is actually what I

18:39

had been concerned about I had been

18:40

concerned that it should it go to the

18:42

Supreme Court they would rule this way

18:45

I'd laugh if it weren't so sad my next

18:47

guest says Donald Trump is still an oath

18:49

breaking insurrectionist the court

18:51

itself may have overstepped the court

18:53

went way further than it needed to go

18:56

our colleague Melissa Murray has called

18:58

this Supreme Court the YOLO Court the

19:00

criticism of the court is that they're

19:02

playing interference not since Bush Vore

19:05

we've seen a court is had this many

19:07

opportunities to interfere in the

19:09

election the headline here is this that

19:11

this is a unanimous ruling but if you

19:13

scratch the surface just a little this

19:15

is a 5 to four ruling I'm part of it

19:18

this is actually a 5 to4 decision it's 5

19:21

to four Trump will take this spin it

19:25

spread the misinformation disinformation

19:26

on it you can't save a people from

19:29

themselves whatever happened to Larry

19:32

sabido remember him Mike Davis back in

19:34

the fox days he was like a normal

19:35

pollster that you could rely on for down

19:37

the-middle analysis now he's gone

19:39

hardcore never Trump um but look I

19:43

understand the five4 argument for the

19:44

reasons that we kicked the show off with

19:46

but on the core point it was 90 and I

19:49

wonder whether these same people are

19:51

going to be so disgusted with the court

19:53

and ready to dismantle it after the

19:55

court is likely Dave to rule against

19:59

Trump and his claims that everything he

20:01

did in office is immune from prosecution

20:04

when we get that decision in May or

20:06

June they're going to rule against him

20:08

on that but they're going to drag their

20:10

feet and that will infuriate my

20:13

colleagues and I understand that because

20:15

if they continue to delay this matter

20:17

the trial in DC may not ever happen so

20:20

that's what they most about what are you

20:22

saying that the only people who dragged

20:25

their feet were Jack Smith and the

20:27

justice department

20:28

as soon as that they filed the charges

20:31

Trump started to challenge it legally

20:33

now it's gone up Supreme Court took it

20:35

they could have kicked it to next fall

20:37

they didn't have to put it on this term

20:38

but they took it on this term they're

20:40

not dragging anything well compared to

20:43

what they did here in the Colorado case

20:44

Megan where they expedited matters to

20:46

give this Trump a decision within weeks

20:48

to make sure it was done before super

20:50

Tuesday where they even issued an

20:52

opinion on a Monday which was so rare

20:54

and then you compare it to intervening

20:57

in Jack Smith's case where they first

20:59

said no we're not going to intervene in

21:01

December no no no we're not going to get

21:03

in and and bigot because Jack was trying

21:06

to skip the DC Circuit Court of Appeals

21:09

that's the only reason they said not yet

21:10

they said you you got out a turn you got

21:12

to go to the middle guys before you come

21:13

to us which Mike every Supreme Court

21:16

would most likely prefer because then

21:18

you get a whole decision with reasoning

21:21

from the lower court that you get to

21:23

kick off the argument with it wasn't

21:24

unusual at all for the court to say slow

21:27

down now you going back you do it before

21:30

this court of appeals and then you come

21:31

to

21:32

us well yeah I mean of course they have

21:34

to decide this Colorado disqualification

21:37

case as quickly as they can because

21:39

these states need to print ballots right

21:42

and they need to print ballots and

21:43

figure out whether Trump is going to be

21:45

on the ballots or not going to be on the

21:47

ballot on this presidential immunity

21:49

they are deciding this case in like

21:51

warped speed they did they they sent

21:53

this case for oral argument in April

21:56

they're not allowing Trump to see on Bon

21:58

review with the DC circuit they're not

22:00

waiting until to to tier oral argument

22:03

in this case next fall or even next

22:05

winter as they should that would be the

22:07

normal course they're very much

22:09

Expediting this and there's no need for

22:11

them to expedite this because it's not

22:13

relevant to the election whether Trump

22:15

is on the ballot is relevant to the

22:17

election whether Trump the Colorado

22:19

election

22:21

today yes I mean look I I would say this

22:24

about presidential immunity I know you

22:26

guys both disagree with me on this but I

22:28

seem to have a track record on this the

22:30

Supreme Court is going to find that the

22:33

president any president is immune from

22:35

Criminal prosecution for his official

22:37

acts then the Supreme Court is going to

22:39

remand this case to DC Obama judge Tanya

22:42

Shuan to hold an evidentiary hearing on

22:44

what Trump did allegedly did on on

22:47

January 6 that was in his official acts

22:49

like you know he was going to fire his

22:51

acting attorney general that sounds

22:52

pretty presidential to me versus in his

22:55

personal capacity and then once they

22:57

decide that Trump can appeal that again

22:59

because you're dealing with immunity and

23:01

so the bottom line is is that there's no

23:03

chance this case is going to go to trial

23:04

before the election and I would say to

23:06

these Democrats boohoo you're going to

23:09

actually have to uh vote for the

23:12

president of the United States on

23:13

November 5th 2024 the oldfashioned way

23:17

instead of having your leftwing judges

23:19

remove him from The Ballot or throw him

23:21

in prison here's um take a listen to Jim

23:24

aosta on CNN talking about

23:28

how sad this is and how

23:31

Trump gets files all these appeals

23:34

delays everything like not like a normal

23:37

person even though everybody in the

23:39

United States who gets convicted or sued

23:42

civil and loses has the opportunity to

23:44

file an appeal which Jim aosta he should

23:47

familiarize himself with a lovely

23:48

service known as Google or or any of its

23:52

competitors which we're moving to now um

23:54

because this is not a special Trump

23:56

thing this is called being an American

23:57

thing watch this and Jim what do you say

24:00

to all those Americans out there who are

24:01

watching this who are frustrated and say

24:04

you know Trump is getting away with uh

24:06

breaking the law that he files appeal

24:09

after appeal he tries to delay every

24:12

proceeding that's brought against him in

24:14

a way that is just just goes against

24:17

what our Judicial System should be about

24:19

I mean isn't he treated differently than

24:21

just about everybody else in this

24:23

country I mean just about anybody else

24:25

would not have the the ability to appeal

24:27

things until uh Kingdom

24:30

Come well actually they do have the

24:32

ability to do that that's part of our

24:33

justice system but for all practical

24:35

purposes it doesn't that doesn't happen

24:38

I mean the vast majority of defendants

24:39

out there don't have the don't have the

24:41

resources to drag everything out and

24:44

Ting different cases across the

24:48

country what

24:51

Mike I mean have they has he heard of

24:54

public defenders I mean if I mean I used

24:56

to I used to clerk for judge Gorsuch on

24:58

the 10 circuit I used to CL C for

25:00

justice Gorsuch on the Supreme Court we

25:02

heard appeal after appeal after appeal

25:05

from rapists and murderers and

25:07

carjackers and these same same Democrats

25:10

who bemon that you know Trump's not

25:13

above the law they want Trump to be

25:14

below the law they want him to not have

25:17

any rights they just want to throw him

25:19

in prison and bankrupt him and take him

25:21

off the ballots after they impeached him

25:24

twice for nonsense because they fear

25:27

American V why do Democrats fear

25:30

American voters why do they not want

25:32

American voters to have a choice on

25:34

November 5th

25:37

2024 I'll tell you why Keith oberman's

25:39

gonna explain it to you I know you were

25:41

waiting to hear from him here you

25:43

go of course I'm respectable says John

25:47

Houston as no across in the movie

25:49

Chinatown to Jack Nicholson as Jake

25:52

giddis I'm old politicians ugly

25:55

buildings and all get respectable

25:59

if they last long

26:00

enough and then there is what happens

26:03

when you are all three of those things

26:06

as the Supreme Court is all three of

26:08

those things politicians pretending to

26:10

be justices working in an ugly building

26:14

and As Trump relied upon and yesterday

26:16

was proven correct they are all

26:20

and I have lots to say about the

26:22

Supreme and what they have done

26:25

and what they might yet do which impr

26:27

probably enough includes making Joe

26:28

Biden into an instant American King yet

26:32

they are not the lead Story the evidence

26:35

is mounting that what Donald Trump is

26:37

suffering from is something

26:40

called fluent

26:43

Aphasia there are 2 million Americans

26:45

with Aphasia a kind of catchall for a

26:48

series of communication disorders and

26:50

obviously this is a Layman asserting

26:52

this I could be wildly

26:56

wrong yes some self-awareness at the end

27:00

I'll give you the first crack on that

27:01

one Mike because I see you

27:03

laughing well I would say this I I take

27:06

offense to what he said about I did I

27:09

you know everything else he said was

27:10

fine but he said the Supreme Court

27:11

building was ugly and I just I take

27:13

great offense to that because I think

27:14

the Supreme Court building is beautiful

27:16

I agree agree with you we can all agree

27:18

on that I know it's absolutely beautiful

27:21

and the actual courtroom in which the

27:22

justices sit is magnificent has a bunch

27:24

of history and I who knows whether Keith

27:27

Overman actually ever dragged himself

27:28

out of his cave to go over and behold

27:31

the Majesty that is the Supreme Court

27:33

building but whatever he's just fun he's

27:36

just fun to listen to I I'm not going to

27:37

lie I'm kind of glad he's in the

27:38

National conversation just because he's

27:39

entertaining but literally nothing he

27:41

says is right I mean it's it's either

27:43

offensive or wrong or both which is why

27:46

we go to him a fair amount okay so it's

27:49

done the insurrectionist thing is over

27:52

um and there's plenty more to discuss on

27:54

the legal front all right now that

27:55

brings me to I'm going to figure figure

27:57

out what I want to do next okay January

28:02

6th that's the underlying case with

28:04

judge chken this is actually getting

28:07

very interesting so her entire

28:10

proceeding is delayed it's

28:13

frozen while scotus in a separate matter

28:17

that we made a reference to tries to

28:19

decide whether Trump is immune to that

28:22

prosecution entirely so it's frozen she

28:24

can't do anything on it and Politico

28:28

comes out with an article called

28:29

entitled The Enormous pressures about to

28:32

land on Judge Tanya

28:35

chuin and in this

28:38

piece the author makes a reference to

28:41

the fact that Jack Smith who's both

28:43

pursuing the January 6th federal case

28:44

against Trump and the maralago documents

28:47

case against Trump in Dave's

28:50

jurisdiction had uh an appearance before

28:53

the Florida judge in the maral Lago case

28:56

recently and said to that judge aen

29:00

Cannon there are no doj policies that

29:03

prevent cases that have already been

29:05

charged from going to trial in the runup

29:09

to the election even if the defendant is

29:12

on the ballot all right not withstanding

29:15

this you know supposed doj policy that

29:18

they would not do anything to interfere

29:19

with an election within 60 days of the

29:21

election they wouldn't charge a

29:22

candidate they wouldn't do anything like

29:24

that cuz they don't want to influence

29:25

the vote um now there saying to judge

29:29

Canon um we we're actually not going to

29:33

follow that in in this case it doesn't

29:35

apply because we charged him well before

29:39

and so now there's real speculation

29:42

about whether judge

29:44

chuin should go ahead with his trial as

29:47

soon as the US Supreme Court gives it

29:49

any sort of a green light should rush it

29:51

to trial in fact and the suggestion is

29:55

that she could hold the trial only 3 to

29:58

four days a week leaving Trump the

30:00

remainder to travel the country in

30:02

campaign hold the trial on alternating

30:05

weeks allowing Trump to campaign in the

30:07

weeks in between his criminal trial in

30:09

DC hold halfday trial days leaving Trump

30:13

the remainder of the day to travel to

30:16

closer States right around Washington DC

30:19

and to Camp campaign nationally through

30:22

his media

30:24

appearances uh and then the writer goes

30:27

on and Kush cardor to say you know what

30:30

the trial also does not need to even end

30:33

before November though that's far from

30:36

ideal they can keep this thing

30:39

rolling and potentially you could get

30:42

him

30:44

convicted even after he

30:47

wins and then he could be I guess kicked

30:52

out not certified I don't know what the

30:55

end plan would be if they got his

30:56

conviction between November and January

30:59

but my Takeaway on this I am coming back

31:01

to you Dave but let me just give this

31:02

one to Mike first too is that these

31:05

Democrats will stop at nothing he can

31:09

campaign in the afternoon in the states

31:12

around Washington DC in October

31:16

2024 yeah remember they waited 30 months

31:20

30 months to bring these charges and

31:23

these are coordinated charges with the

31:25

Biden White House and the Biden justice

31:28

department I've given you specific names

31:30

in each one of these cases where they're

31:32

specifically coordinating yet Nathan

31:34

Wade for example billing his time to

31:36

meet with the Biden White House and the

31:38

Biden White House Council right yet had

31:39

mat Matthew Colangelo going from the

31:42

Biden justice department the number

31:43

three office to Alvin Bragg's office to

31:47

bring the first indictment ever against

31:48

a former president and a likely future

31:50

president uh you had Jonathan Sue

31:53

Biden's Deputy White House counsel wave

31:55

Trump's claim of executive a privilege

31:58

uh on behalf of President Biden so you

31:59

have Biden's fingerprints on all four of

32:02

these things you had Biden going out

32:03

there leaking that Garland was acting

32:06

like a professor instead of an attorney

32:07

general and so then Garland moved

32:09

forward and we have these four

32:11

coordinated indictments and criminal

32:14

charges against Trump and they've timed

32:16

these trials back to back to back right

32:20

during the 2024 presidential election

32:22

season and Jack Smith will probably uh

32:26

convince DC Obama judge T shuckin that

32:28

he can do this uh maybe he'll convince

32:31

judge Canon but here's the deal the the

32:33

legitimacy of the judicial system is on

32:36

the line when the American people start

32:38

paying attention and they see President

32:40

Trump in a courtroom for these bogus

32:43

charges instead of on the campaign Trail

32:46

this is not going to go well with the

32:47

American people and when when when the

32:50

justice system loses its legitimacy with

32:53

half of the American people they're

32:54

going to lose a lot of their funding I

32:57

mean Dave if this is the

33:00

Democrats campaign strategy this is the

33:04

thing that Biden thinks will win him the

33:07

election that as again quoting here from

33:11

Andy who's making a reference to Adam

33:13

lipac of the New York Times outlining

33:16

outlining the possible plan a felony

33:19

trial of trump on the January 6 charges

33:22

before a hostile Washington jury pool

33:24

and an unfriendly obama-appointed judge

33:27

beginning after Labor Day running

33:30

through election day that is the Biden

33:33

campaign

33:35

strategy it's

33:38

outrageous it could work I guess I don't

33:42

do we have a judge in chut in judge

33:44

chuin who would go along with

33:48

this Megan there is absolutely no

33:52

evidence that Joe Biden has been pulling

33:54

the strings on any of this stuff

33:55

remember he and I would agree is

33:58

frustrated with Merrick Garland because

33:59

Merrick Garland the one thing I'll agree

34:01

with what Mike said is that he slow

34:02

walked a lot of this stuff he is timid

34:05

and I don't think he was the right pick

34:06

for attorney general but he finally

34:08

appointed a special prosecutor and then

34:09

it was on remember this is the same

34:11

attorney general who's Prosecuting Joe

34:13

Biden's son the same guy who let Robert

34:15

her become the special counsel and then

34:18

release this report bashing Joe Biden's

34:20

mental acuity and as far as the

34:21

Department of Justice and this 60-day

34:23

rule there has never been a rule that

34:25

says you cannot try case before the

34:27

election just ask Senator well he's not

34:29

around anymore Senator Ted Stevens of

34:31

Alaska he had a trial uh for his U fraud

34:35

claims his uh his criminal activity in

34:37

late September of the Year where he was

34:40

up for re-election in fact the jury gave

34:43

a guilty verdict a week before election

34:45

day so this has happened before it's not

34:47

a surprise it's happening now and if

34:49

anything I I gotta tell you I think the

34:51

Supreme Court was dragging its feet I

34:54

know we've talked about this and one

34:55

other thing about that they didn't have

34:57

to intervene in this matter they didn't

34:59

have to wait two weeks to then say yeah

35:01

we're going to get involved and then

35:02

when they did so even after they granted

35:04

Ser they didn't have to issue a stay and

35:06

then they could have had the oral

35:07

argument like now like in March it's all

35:09

teed up you don't have to wait till the

35:11

end of April so I I look at it from a

35:13

different perspective not only is there

35:15

no coordination between Biden and the

35:17

prosecutors here but it looks like the

35:19

Supreme Court has been intentionally

35:21

dragging its feet to make sure Justice

35:22

is not served before the election and

35:24

voters don't get the information they

35:26

need to make a rational Choice I'm going

35:29

to I'm going to have to bust out my

35:30

mother's cupboard again aren't I Dave

35:33

lack of planning on your part does not

35:34

justify an emergency on my part she used

35:36

to whip that thing open whenever I'd be

35:38

like Mom I need you to pick up my school

35:40

report and bring it I forgot it no it's

35:43

they drag their feet now it's not up to

35:45

the Supreme Court to suddenly have to go

35:46

faster than that aircraft carrier

35:48

normally goes it's just not how things

35:51

work there but I will say Mike was

35:54

nodding his head yes whether judge

35:55

shutkin could actually help them engage

35:58

in this strategy on j6 but here's here's

36:03

the thing I want to get back to Andy's

36:05

saying Mike the doj pointing out even if

36:09

Trump wins in

36:10

November and and Mike Davis is his AG

36:14

elect right is the one that he's going

36:16

to appoint you will not be in power

36:20

until January 20th

36:23

2025 and he writes remember a president

36:26

El is in no position to dismiss anything

36:31

there may be more than enough time

36:32

between September and January to get

36:35

Trump not only convicted but sentenced

36:38

Jack Smith is banking on at least the

36:40

former the conviction and he'll push for

36:43

the latter too if it's remotely

36:46

attainable my God so that he's POS I

36:49

hadn't even considered this scenario

36:51

Mike where Trump where they do press

36:54

forward on j6 trial before judge chuin

36:58

after the Supreme Court rules if they

37:00

allow this case to go forward in any way

37:02

and I realize the whole heart of that

37:03

case may get gutted by another case that

37:06

they're about to hear Fisher that's

37:07

another

37:08

matter that they might put pedal to the

37:11

metal make him do the half days or the

37:14

four days a week what have you he wins

37:16

the election and between November 5th

37:20

and

37:21

January they get a conviction and

37:25

sentence him to prison said what happens

37:28

then does anyone have any idea what

37:31

happens then and that's that's why this

37:34

Jack Smith is a scud missile that the

37:37

Democrats send in and he is so reckless

37:39

remember he was overturned nine to

37:41

nothing when he brought his bogus

37:43

corruption charges against former

37:45

Virginia governor Bob McDonald a likely

37:48

presidential or vice presidential

37:49

candidate and in 2016 he was able to win

37:53

his conviction and Destroy Bob

37:55

McDonald's political life and personal

37:58

life and then the Supreme Court 8 to

38:00

nothing reversed him in 2016 it would

38:03

have been nine to nothing but Justice

38:05

Kalia passed away right but that's

38:08

exactly who Jack Smith was he got

38:10

banished to the heg because he's he is a

38:13

partisan buffoon prosecutor and then

38:15

garlands brought him back as the scud

38:18

missile to take out president Trump

38:21

before the election this is all about

38:23

election interference they're not even

38:26

hyp it anymore it's very blatant that

38:29

what they're doing is they're trying to

38:31

interfere in the election they don't

38:33

care what the American people want they

38:35

fear American voters and so they're

38:37

trying to bankrupt disqualify from the

38:41

bout and put Trump in prison because

38:44

they don't want the American people to

38:45

put Trump back in the White House okay

38:48

Dave do I mean I think the answer to my

38:51

question is we don't know right it's

38:54

truly unprecedented to have a an elected

38:57

pre a president elect get convicted of a

39:00

felony and be sentenced to jail after

39:03

he's been elected but before he's been

39:05

sworn in like I don't think we know

39:08

we're on unchartered grounds here are we

39:11

not agreed we don't know and I get asked

39:13

that question all the time you can run

39:15

for president from prison you could

39:17

technically serve as president from

39:20

prison what would be interesting if he

39:22

is convicted and then he takes office I

39:25

assume there would be a stay I assume

39:26

there'd be an appeal and he his sentence

39:29

would be stayed and then he would go

39:31

into the White House and then nothing

39:33

would happen until after he's out I

39:35

think that's why he's running for he can

39:36

pardon himself right once he's sworn in

39:38

he can pardon himself well it's not

39:40

clear whether that would stick he can

39:42

try he could also resign temporarily

39:45

under I forgot which Mike can help me

39:47

which amendment where the vice president

39:49

takes over briefly and then par which

39:52

one is it Mike 25th there you go 25th so

39:57

uh that could happen but you know the

39:59

reason why Donald Trump is running for

40:00

president is because he realizes this is

40:02

the best way to escape all the legal

40:04

liability swirling over his head and it

40:06

may just

40:08

work it so far it is working all right

40:10

so there's there are other development

40:12

still going some crazy ones out of New

40:14

York too I'm going to take a quick break

40:16

and come back the legal news today is

40:17

actually really interesting we haven't

40:18

even gotten to Fanny we have to ask if

40:20

our guys can stay just a little later uh

40:22

we'll do that during the break Mike and

40:23

Dave stay with

40:25

us

40:27

Financial experts thought we were in the

40:29

clear they were anticipating around six

40:32

rate cuts by the fed this year and then

40:35

the inflation data came out and higher

40:37

than expected this is not going away how

40:40

can it we're 34 trillion in the whole in

40:43

America and yet we keep printing the

40:45

money which pushes the prices you pay

40:47

even higher every day so you can either

40:49

bury your head in the sand or you can do

40:51

something about it one option to

40:53

consider is to diversify a portion of

40:56

your savings into gold with Birch gold

41:00

group gold can be your hedge against

41:02

inflation and Birch gold makes it easy

41:05

to own they will help you convert an

41:07

existing Ira or 401K into a tax

41:10

sheltered Ira in gold and you don't pay

41:12

a penny out of pocket text Megan meyn to

41:17

989 898 989 898 and get your free info

41:22

kit on gold and then talk to a precious

41:25

metals specialist

41:26

about how you can choose to protect your

41:28

savings from persistent inflation with

41:30

gold text Megan to

41:33

98898

41:36

now one final point that um we raised

41:39

the other day Andy raised it to in this

41:40

in this piece and I thought it was

41:41

important in the Florida Case by you

41:44

Dave

41:46

um they went in there both sides and

41:49

said okay how about a summer trial date

41:52

um the prosecution said we want July or

41:54

I think July 8th and team Trump said

41:56

said no that's too soon but we could do

41:59

August

41:59

12th and no one really thinks that case

42:03

is going to go off on August 12th but

42:05

the the thinking is that what he was

42:07

doing there was getting a placeholder on

42:11

that case so that judge chuin over in DC

42:14

and all the Peril I just described there

42:16

can't go anytime soon because they're

42:19

not going to make Trump sit for

42:20

simultaneous criminal trials so one is

42:22

going to have to go before another so

42:24

team Trump appears to have thought okay

42:26

better to have that one on the calendar

42:27

than judge shutkin let's keep her at

42:29

arms length but Annie makes the point

42:32

that well the downside to this is

42:34

Trump's lawyers have now undermined

42:36

their credibility to argue to judge

42:38

chuin that the Biden Department of

42:40

Justice must not be allowed to subject

42:43

Trump to a criminal trial during the

42:46

campaign stretch run so how could that

42:50

manifest the judge judge Canon and maral

42:52

Lago would say you know what we're not

42:54

doing it on August 12th I know that was

42:56

we had a placeholder but too much to go

42:58

through so no and then suddenly this big

43:00

beautiful window of time opens up and

43:02

judge chuin says I'm back from my

43:04

european vacation and I would love to do

43:07

it and at that point is he saying like

43:10

Trump would be inable to ARG unable to

43:12

argue oh but it's not fair because he

43:15

already agreed to in another

43:17

jurisdiction it hurts his argument but

43:19

Trump said that they can't do it before

43:21

the election and then he was pushed by

43:24

judge C to said give us a date you got

43:25

to give us a date so then they said okay

43:27

August 12th for the reasons that you and

43:29

Andy have mentioned they thought it

43:31

would block judge chuin future uh

43:33

calendar but it is correct that now they

43:37

can use that against him but when it

43:38

comes to judge Canon it won't matter

43:41

that case is not happening before the

43:42

election judge canet is going to give

43:45

into Trump's demands to delay it where

43:47

it could come into play is yes with

43:48

judge Chuck and when Trump says we can't

43:50

do it before right before the election

43:52

then judge shuckin says Ah you gave them

43:55

August so that is a real possibility and

43:57

yes she has said she's going to ditch

43:59

her European Vacation to come back and

44:01

try this case so kudos to her sure

44:04

she's like this is vacation for me this

44:06

is this is the happiest place on Earth

44:08

not

44:09

Disneyland okay let's jump to New York

44:12

for a minute there are big updates today

44:13

on Fanny I'm going to save it to the top

44:15

of the hour

44:17

um via ktie Fang of Ms uh Donald Trump

44:20

has until later this week to post a

44:22

9163 million bond to stay the execution

44:27

of egene Carroll's judgment against him

44:30

this is the civil case for first it was

44:32

sexual assault and then the big judgment

44:34

for was for him allegedly defaming her

44:36

and um Newsweek says of course in New

44:40

York a a person must pay a court cash

44:42

bond that amounts to 110% of the

44:43

judgment to appeal the ruling of a civil

44:45

case that's why it's more than the 83

44:47

million that was ordered so he has to

44:48

pay $91 million and bond to stay the

44:51

execution of that civil judgment against

44:53

him as he tries to appeal this on Monday

44:57

judge Lewis Kaplan said he would not

44:59

reach a decision on Trump's motion to

45:01

stay the execution of this judgment but

45:04

he will render a decision soon so Mike

45:08

what does this mean is Trump going to

45:10

have to post this bond for 91 million

45:13

and is he then going to have to post the

45:15

bond for the half a billion doll

45:19

judgment that's been handed down against

45:21

him in the corporate fraud case against

45:23

The Smiling judge

45:24

angaran I mean that's the problem I mean

45:27

so what is is Trump going to have to

45:29

liquidate assets to pay the bonds on

45:32

these bogus judgments up in New York I

45:35

mean they changed the law in New York

45:37

for this this Nut Job Jean Carroll's

45:40

bogus claims against Trump I don't have

45:43

any money Jean carolon go ahead and try

45:45

to say she's gonna sue you she's g go go

45:47

go ahead go ahead sweetheart uh but you

45:50

know here's the deal I mean Trump's

45:52

going to have to liquidate his assets

45:55

he's going to have to post these bonds

45:56

or they're going to go in and what like

45:57

take over his buildings and do fire

46:00

sales this is the again this is part of

46:03

the Democrat laware they're doing this

46:05

on many fronts they're doing this on the

46:06

disqualification front the impeachment

46:09

front the four criminal indictments

46:11

they're trying to bankrupt him for nonf

46:12

fraud they're trying to go after him for

46:15

$100 million but genan Carol this is

46:17

laware and election interference and

46:19

Democrats may be gleeful about this

46:21

right now but they're not going to be

46:22

very gleeful When Donald Trump

46:24

essentially runs over their puppy with a

46:26

lawnmower on November 5th 2024 and he

46:29

wents back to White House what an image

46:32

that's a terrible image terrible image

46:35

Dave I really am interested in this

46:37

because when he tried to get the New

46:39

York appeals court to reduce the amount

46:42

of bond he had to post in that half a

46:44

billion dollar judgment against him the

46:47

judge said no now he's trying to get a

46:50

larger panel of the appell court to

46:52

reconsider this um arguing that it's an

46:56

excessive fine under the eth amendment

46:59

which prohibits cruel and unusual but

47:01

also excessive fines and so far these

47:04

judges are all saying no no no post the

47:09

bond the one judge said you can the on

47:12

the 500 million they said we let you go

47:14

get loans all right if you if you want

47:16

loans you can go get loans because

47:17

originally that crazy judge Enron said

47:19

you can't even get a loan for this from

47:21

any bank that even does business in New

47:23

York which rules out every Bank in the

47:24

world and so they said all right you can

47:26

you can get a loan but what's going to

47:29

happen because there's like a Wall

47:30

Street Journal piece today really

47:31

talking about how Leticia James is

47:34

threatening to seize his properties and

47:36

while that's really not the state's

47:37

first choice because they don't know how

47:39

to run buildings or sell

47:43

buildings um that what what else can

47:46

they do that's that's their threat and

47:49

if he doesn't post the bond that that

47:51

would have to be their next

47:53

move right I do think he'll get loan to

47:56

pay off the bonds but you're you're

47:58

correct Megan this is a real threat to

48:01

Donald Trump and he takes this very

48:02

personally when you go after his

48:03

finances but this is where his own

48:05

rhetoric hurts him because when he says

48:07

how rich he is and he has way more money

48:09

than people know yeah the courts use

48:11

that against him so a lot of this is his

48:13

own he GNA get the loans but how is he

48:17

gonna get the loans because I understand

48:19

he's got some money but if you're a bank

48:21

and you see how leveraged he is right

48:23

now to the tune of over a half a billion

48:25

and I can see you not wanting to loan

48:27

anything to Donald Trump my own fear is

48:30

like the Saudis are going to be like hey

48:32

we'll do it and then he owes the Saudis

48:36

which we don't want in our future

48:38

president that is a real concern that's

48:40

something Megan that I think we can all

48:42

agree on we do not want that now Trump

48:45

does have an asset that could be blowing

48:48

up financially which is the true social

48:50

where he could be aligned for a couple

48:52

billion dollars so he could put that up

48:54

as collateral so that's something

48:55

something that he could use to get a

48:57

loan all right that's better um Mike do

49:00

you am I wrong to fear like China coming

49:03

in and saying we can cover the the 500

49:06

uh million bucks here you go yeah I mean

49:09

it would be very bad to have a president

49:11

of the United States corrupted and

49:13

compromised by Foreign loans and

49:16

payments you know from China from

49:18

Ukraine from Russia from Kazakhstan from

49:21

Romania every other trouble spot around

49:23

the world I mean I'd hate to see a

49:24

president of the United states where his

49:26

family members take any money from these

49:28

foreign countries oh wait how about the

49:30

bidens and the Biden crime

49:33

family okay this would dwarf that on a

49:36

massive scale but I'm against it just I

49:39

want to go on record and say I'm against

49:40

it for Biden I'm against it for Donald

49:42

Trump too I really hope this doesn't

49:43

happen but this is kind of the position

49:45

he's being placed in I mean what would

49:47

you do if you were Donald Trump would

49:49

you sell Trump Tower so Leticia James

49:52

could get it just to give to these

49:54

Democrats in Albany who are busy taxing

49:57

us to our eyeballs there's no victim

50:00

who's going to get this money uh all

50:02

right standby Fanny's next and there's

50:03

two new Witnesses in the case don't go

50:06

[Music]

50:07

away I want to tell you about the

50:10

association of mature American citizens

50:12

or AMAC an organization dedicated to

50:15

America's seniors AMAC stands out today

50:18

by not only advocating for senior issues

50:20

but also by pushing for conservative

50:23

values that affect us all don't you want

50:25

a group representing you that actually

50:26

shares your values if you join you're

50:29

not just supporting America's senior

50:31

citizens you can become part of a

50:32

movement defending our freedoms and

50:35

securing our nation's future Plus

50:38

Membership brings you exclusive benefits

50:40

like discounts on travel dining

50:42

entertainment and special insurance

50:44

rates regardless of your age if you're

50:46

driven to preserve Freedom AMAC welcomes

50:49

you sign up now at

50:51

amac.us Megan that's

50:54

amac.us Megan and for a limited time get

50:57

a free gift membership for someone who

50:58

shares your love of our great nation

51:01

don't miss out on this chance to make a

51:02

difference with AAC join today at

51:05

amac.us Megan and extend the invitation

51:07

to a friend or family member for

51:12

free and before we get to Fanny Willis

51:14

I've got to tell you this has been

51:15

reminding me of something I've made this

51:17

reference before it's one of my favorite

51:19

movies and it should be one of

51:20

everyone's favorite movies this Keith

51:22

Overman little rap that he did to day on

51:25

the Supreme Court and that he did last

51:27

week on the Supreme Court remember here

51:29

it

51:30

is the conservatives on the Supreme

51:32

Court are Trump's chief justice

51:35

Roberts is a trump and he can burn

51:38

in hell and Justice Alo is a trump

51:41

and he can burn in hell and Justice

51:43

Gorsuch is a self-contradicting trump

51:46

and he can burn in hell and

51:48

Justice Kavanaugh is a drunken abuser

51:50

Trump and he can burn in hell and

51:53

Justice Barrett is a hand made Trump

51:56

and she can burn in

51:59

hell reminds me of Tommy Boy Stand By

52:04

and that's when the come in here

52:07

we

52:11

go God bless Chris Farley God bless

52:15

Chris Farley we can all agree on that

52:16

he's obsessed the man's obsessed I'm

52:18

just telling you there's some sort of a

52:19

revelation in his constant focus on

52:21

hores I'm just going to put it out there

52:22

there's some some sort of a revelation I

52:24

leave it to the AUD to figure out what

52:26

that is okay on to Fanny Willis where

52:29

there is new news um not one but two

52:33

witnesses have now come forward to

52:35

various defendants saying that they

52:37

would like to and are ready to testify

52:40

they are both saying shocker Terrence

52:44

Bradley is full of BS the lawyer who

52:48

once represented Nathan W for a short

52:49

time and was Nathan Wade's friend and

52:51

when he took the stand not withstanding

52:53

all of his admissions to uh attorney

52:55

Ashley Merchant before he got to the

52:57

stand about yes I know when it happened

52:58

it was long before they said they were

53:00

lovers it happened when she left um the

53:03

DA's office as a junior person and

53:05

became a judge in 2019 and then he gets

53:07

on the stand doesn't remember anything

53:08

two other people are like he talked to

53:11

me like that too he told me all the same

53:13

Secrets he told Ashley Merchant and went

53:15

on and on and had great details so it

53:17

wasn't just the texts to Ashley all

53:20

right number one is a woman named Cindy

53:23

Lee Jagger who is not just some Rando

53:27

Cindy Lee jger is currently the co-chief

53:30

deputy da for Cobb County the

53:33

neighboring County this is fton County

53:35

for Fanny but you know kind of next door

53:37

this is the co-chief Deputy da so this

53:40

person also has an obligation of cander

53:41

for the court to the court and she is

53:44

apparently ready to take the stand if

53:45

the judge because he's still considering

53:47

whether he will reopen the evidence or

53:49

whether he even needs to reopen the

53:50

evidence uh and she says from August of

53:54

23 through January of 24 all right so

53:56

basically this past fall that's the same

53:58

time Ashley Merchant was talking to

53:59

Terence Bradley that she had numerous

54:02

conversations with Bradley as well in

54:05

which he was talking about his favorite

54:07

subject Willis and Wade in their romance

54:10

according to the filing he told Miss

54:12

Jagger that relationship began see if

54:15

this sounds familiar guys around the

54:17

time that Willis and Wade met at a

54:19

Judicial conference in 2019 Wade quote

54:23

had def definitively begun a romantic

54:26

relationship with Miss Willis during the

54:28

time that Miss Willis was running for da

54:31

which was 2019 to 2020 Mr Bradley stated

54:34

that he had personal knowledge of this

54:37

relationship and included details

54:39

regarding Mr Wade's use of Robin or Miss

54:44

Willis's use of Robin UTI's apartment

54:47

and other meetings between the two of

54:49

them prior to November of 2021 which is

54:52

when he filed for divorce and got hired

54:54

by Fanny

54:55

um Mr Bradley told Cindy Lee jger She

54:59

alleges again this is an officer of the

55:01

Court saying this that Mr Wade

55:03

personally prepared his own divorce

55:05

complaint against his spouse and told

55:07

Terrence Bradley you just sign the

55:09

divorce filings and file them suggesting

55:11

that the actual attorney client

55:13

relationship did not begin until around

55:16

November of

55:18

2021 and not back in 18 as Terrence

55:21

Bradley testified and they say based

55:25

upon these statements it is M jager's

55:27

understanding that Mr Bradley did not

55:29

begin representing Mr Wade until

55:30

November of

55:32

2021 all right

55:34

now just going to give you the second

55:37

thing this happened this morning moments

55:40

ago another person has come forward

55:42

another officer of the Court his name is

55:44

attorney Manny Aurora former Adjunct

55:47

professor at Georgia State School of

55:49

Law apparently he's a friend of Terrence

55:52

Bradley's Terrence Bradley he talked a

55:56

lot he spoke to Terrence Bradley says

55:59

Manny and um he's willing to testify

56:04

that Terrence Bradley same time period

56:06

September October 2023 this past fall

56:08

regarding the relationship between

56:09

Willis and Wade Aurora claims that

56:11

Terrence Bradley told him the

56:13

relationship began when Willis was

56:15

running for da in 2019 through 2020 that

56:18

Bradley had personal knowledge of the

56:20

relationship including details regarding

56:22

the use of Robin Yu's apartment that's

56:24

EX exactly what the other one said

56:26

personal knowledge including the use of

56:28

Robin y's apartment and he adds that Mr

56:32

Wade this is what this guy learned from

56:34

Terence Bradley had a garage door opener

56:38

to the property this rang a bell with us

56:42

because Ashley Merchant I think was also

56:45

told this by Terence Bradley because she

56:46

raised it when he was on the stand we

56:48

pulled the so watch do you recall that

56:51

he had a garage door opener to either a

56:54

house or a condo or something like that

56:57

of Miss

57:00

Willis I've never seen a garage door

57:03

opener so no I do not have any personal

57:05

knowledge of him having a garage door

57:08

opener you have any knowledge at all

57:10

from Mr Wade or any source that he had a

57:14

garage door opener to access one of Miss

57:16

Willis's residents and I'll object to

57:18

the any source as to hearsay all right

57:20

depends on the source

57:23

overed no not I don't have any

57:28

knowledge well it's clear that Ashley

57:31

Merchant got that from somewhere it

57:33

appears to have been him but for sure

57:35

we've got a lawyer named Manny Aurora

57:38

who's willing to take the stand and say

57:40

he told me Terence Bradley told me Mr

57:42

Wade had a garage opener uh to that

57:46

property and again we have another

57:48

witness a DA saying he told me that they

57:51

were having an affair at that time and

57:53

had details about the use of her

57:55

apartment and other meeting I I mean the

57:58

little Butterball turkey the thing has

58:01

popped out it's done it's done Dave is

58:05

it done am I like how many witnesses

58:07

have to come forward to put the lie to

58:10

this it's only done if they had

58:12

firsthand information what they're doing

58:14

is just again saying that Terrence

58:16

Bradley lied on the stand he was out

58:18

there saying things and and he has

58:20

clearly loose lips and then when he got

58:22

in the stand he said well I was just

58:23

speculating so I think that's what would

58:24

happen happen here he'd get put on the

58:26

stand he'd say I was just speculating I

58:28

was talking trash and so I don't think

58:30

that moves the needle as much as

58:32

something else Megan that you may have

58:33

seen where the first witness jger said

58:37

that she heard ponnie Wilson's voice on

58:39

a phone call to Brad talking and that

58:42

would right that would contradict

58:44

actually yeah that I think is a bigger

58:46

deal than this this to me because it's

58:49

not firsthand information does not move

58:50

the needle and I don't think that the

58:52

judge is going to reopen it just for

58:54

this it's that other thing which we'll

58:55

talk about which may be a bigger problem

58:57

I'll I'll just fill it in now um this

59:00

first witness this assistant uh Deputy

59:03

da in Cobb County is willing to take the

59:06

stand and tell this judge under oath

59:08

that Fanny Willis was calling Terence

59:11

Bradley when Bradley was visiting

59:14

joerger in September so Bradley was with

59:16

joerger and he got a phone call from

59:18

Fanny and she was calling Bradley in

59:20

response to an article that was

59:21

published about how much money Nathan

59:23

Wade and his law partner had been paid

59:25

in the case she was mad cuz the Press

59:26

was going off about how well compensated

59:29

this one guy was with no no relevant

59:33

experience in Prosecuting Rico felonies

59:35

and so on and Miss joerger personally

59:38

heard da Willis tell Terrence Bradley

59:42

quote they are coming after us you don't

59:45

need to talk to them about anything

59:48

about us us an obvious reference to

59:53

Fanny and Nathan

59:55

Mike all of this undercuts Terrence

59:58

Bradley trying to claim he knew nothing

60:00

on that stand and of course the

60:02

underlying under oath assertions by

60:05

Willis and Wade about their

60:07

Affair yeah I mean this is a train wreck

60:10

and I would say about this Terrence

60:11

Bradley look he's a lawyer he was a law

60:14

partner with Nathan

60:16

Wade why is he running his look why is

60:19

he running his mouth just keep your damn

60:21

mouth shut even if it's not exactly an

60:24

client relationship or may or may not be

60:28

if if you're a law partner if you're a a

60:30

previous lawyer future lawyer just keep

60:33

your damn mouth shut why is he running

60:35

his mouth to all these people it's just

60:37

that to me just makes me not like him at

60:39

all I I know why I don't know this is my

60:42

opinion is he's mad he got pushed out of

60:45

the firm over allegations of sexual

60:48

assault that he denies um so he doesn't

60:51

have and then he got that's when his

60:53

relationship with Nathan Wade at least

60:54

as a lawyer ended he testified and that

60:57

was I think summer of 2022 or or maybe

61:01

September of 2022 so he's probably

61:04

pissed off a little that not only did

61:06

they push him out of the firm but he got

61:07

accused of being a terrible person of

61:09

like sexual assault again which he

61:11

denied on the stand um and so while it

61:15

appears they had some contact going

61:16

forward it wasn't particularly close he

61:18

denied that they had any contact but now

61:20

we had this guy calling Ashley Merchant

61:22

leaving the voicemail saying I them

61:24

having lunch together a couple of weeks

61:26

ago so Nathan Wade and Terence Bradley

61:29

and that I know these players I knew

61:31

exactly who it was and I introduced

61:33

myself and like just all the bricks are

61:36

falling out of this wall for Terence

61:37

Bradley and why because he's embarrassed

61:41

that he did blab inappropriately on a

61:43

friend and worse potentially on a client

61:46

but he did blab and it's out there and

61:48

for better for the worse I don't know

61:50

you tell me the judge is a human there's

61:52

no sequester order on him and and media

61:55

Dave so he's going to know this and he's

61:57

got to review these motions to see

61:59

whether he's going to allow these people

62:00

to

62:01

testify right I agree with everything

62:03

you and Mike said about Terrence Bradley

62:06

remember when fonny Willis's lawyers

62:08

went after him we didn't understand why

62:10

so why go after your own witness he's

62:12

given your side whatever you wanted but

62:14

now we know because I guess they

62:17

anticipate all this stuff coming out and

62:19

the fact is he did have a bad breakup

62:21

with Nathan Wade and so yeah this is

62:24

something the judge is aware of the

62:26

judge may have already made up his mind

62:27

and this doesn't matter but if the judge

62:29

has not or if he's ruling for fonny

62:31

Willis then he's more likely to allow

62:33

this to come in I I still believe the

62:35

the only thing that really is relevant

62:37

here is that conversation that that uh

62:40

joerger heard herself of fonny Willis's

62:43

voice talking to Terrence Bradley I'm

62:46

just gonna say Mike how do you speculate

62:50

that he has a garage door opener that he

62:53

uses to access access this apartment

62:55

owned by Robin yuti where he's visiting

62:57

that's quite a

62:59

speculation and very specific a very

63:02

specific speculation I mean this case is

63:05

a mess I I I don't know if Dave is with

63:07

me now that this case they should

63:09

absolutely get disqualified from this

63:11

case and this case should be dismissed

63:14

with a new prosecutor brought in because

63:16

it is so corrupted the I would say to

63:18

the Democrats why would you use these

63:22

corrupt lying be

63:25

as your front people for the laware

63:27

against a former and likely future

63:30

president of the United States if you're

63:32

going to run ware in 2028 pick better

63:35

people next time I think that's good

63:37

advice that's free legal advice I agree

63:39

with that and I want to tell the

63:40

audience again tomorrow at 9:00 amm

63:42

Ashley Merchant will be taking the stand

63:45

in front of the Georgia Senate committee

63:47

that's investigating this they've

63:49

subpoena her and all of the texts

63:51

between Ashley Merchant and Terrence

63:53

Bradley they've already interviewed what

63:55

they say are whistleblowers in this case

63:58

though we don't know anything more about

63:59

that so we're expecting to learn a fact

64:03

or two directly from Ashley Merchant

64:04

tomorrow when interestingly she takes

64:06

the stand all the lawyers are taking

64:08

pretty soon David Mike are GNA have to

64:09

take the standing I'm gonna take the

64:11

stand we're all gonna be but we'll tell

64:13

the truth guys thank you so much we

64:15

appreciate it thank you thank you Megan

64:18

all right when we come right back the

64:20

mystery of Matt drudge there is a new

64:23

podcast test out which is riveting about

64:26

one of the biggest names and least

64:28

understood men in

64:31

media let me tell you a story about a

64:34

guy named Leo gillo Leo was on a road

64:37

trip and came across a doberman this dog

64:39

was severely underweight and clearly in

64:41

trouble Leo rescued the dog and named

64:44

him Delta sadly Delta was just one of

64:46

many animals that needed help and this

64:48

inspired Leo to start Delta rescue the

64:51

largest no kill care for Life Animal

64:53

Sanctuary in the world they've rescued

64:56

thousands of dogs cats and horses from

64:58

the Wilderness and they provide their

65:00

animals with shelter love safety a home

65:04

dedication and everlasting love to

65:07

animals that's Leo's Mission and his

65:09

legacy Delta rescue relies solely on

65:12

contributions to stay open and if you

65:14

want caring for these animals to be part

65:15

of your legacy speak with your estate

65:17

planner because there are tax benefits

65:19

too you can grow your estate while

65:22

letting your love for animals live well

65:23

into the future check out the estate

65:25

planning tab on their website to learn

65:27

more and speak with your adviser we T

65:30

call dog a man's best friend for a

65:31

reason you can help those who need it

65:33

most visit deltar rescue.org today to

65:36

learn more that's deltar

65:42

rescue.org it is one of the great

65:44

mysteries in media where in the world is

65:49

Matt drudge despite being named one of

65:52

the most influential names in in

65:54

journalism Matt drudge has all but

65:57

disappeared from the public eye his

65:59

website Drudge Report is still going

66:02

strong but is he even behind it anymore

66:05

and why did he turn so hard against

66:08

Trump in 2020 after having been pretty

66:10

openly supportive of him in

66:13

2016 all these questions have led to a

66:15

fascinating new podcast called finding

66:18

Matt drudge the host and producer Chris

66:21

Moody and Jamie Weinstein join me now

66:25

welcome to the show Chris and Jamie

66:26

great to have you thank you for having

66:28

us great to be here Jamie great to see

66:31

you again what a what a fun idea for a

66:34

podcast he really is this you know

66:37

enigmatic guy who no one ever sees I I

66:41

have seen him one time I have had one

66:43

in-person interaction with Matt drudge

66:45

was in the Fox News Green Room and um he

66:49

likes it that way it's not just because

66:51

he's looking to stir up Buzz about him

66:53

he really is is reclusive and so talk to

66:57

me about how like you got this

67:00

idea well it was in the middle of the

67:02

pandemic uh we're looking for something

67:04

to do so my my wife and I we started a

67:06

little production company and this was

67:08

the first idea I had in part because

67:11

Matt drudge obviously wields influence

67:13

and has for over 25 years helped shape

67:15

the media narrative uh but there's also

67:18

a mystery to it as you mentioned they're

67:19

questions that people still don't know

67:21

they don't know why Matt drudge became

67:23

inre in inly reclusive over the years

67:25

ended His Radio Show stopped going to

67:27

the White House Correspondence Dinner uh

67:29

basically disappeared from public life

67:31

for the last decade uh they also don't

67:34

know why he turned against Donald Trump

67:36

after pretty heavily uh going all in for

67:39

Trump and and as we show in our podcast

67:42

visiting the White House after Donald

67:43

Trump was elected and there's even

67:47

speculation there was an article a

67:48

couple years ago and some of the people

67:50

that Chris talks to on the show still

67:52

think perhaps he he doesn't even run the

67:54

site anymore uh so there's these

67:57

mysterious questions surrounding him

67:58

he's obviously a person of great

68:00

influence we thought that combination

68:02

made uh for a pretty interesting show

68:05

and that's why we went and did it

68:07

totally absolutely it does I just in the

68:10

um just so people know I don't know if

68:11

the audience is familiar with the Drudge

68:13

Report they must be because it's one of

68:14

the biggest sites online um he doesn't

68:17

like it when you call it a Blog it

68:20

Aggregates stories and it could

68:22

basically be the news room you know the

68:25

sort of editorial hub for Fox News for

68:28

many years or for other right leaning

68:30

Publications he has enormous power in

68:33

conservative circles and Beyond yes my

68:35

team is telling me that in the mediaite

68:37

power rankings this year um okay I was

68:41

number four they're telling me and Matt

68:43

Dreger is number five so he's a power

68:44

very very powerful very clearly uh but

68:47

he legit is and um you went back can I

68:51

just add he's five now and that's at

68:54

when people are saying his power has

68:56

ebed you know he's not he's not at its

68:58

height so you know even after 26 years

69:01

he he is still in the top five of the

69:04

mediaite power rankings which shows just

69:06

how powerful he must have been at his

69:08

very height yeah I mean truly when I was

69:10

at Fox News you did not start your day

69:13

without going to the judge report you

69:15

just it it wasn't done and then you

69:17

could see over the years him changed for

69:18

sure his feelings about Trump changed

69:21

and I don't know if you guys noticed

69:22

this and we have all sorts of fun SS

69:23

from your podcast that we're going to

69:24

play but my own impression was he was

69:27

very much behind Trump in 16 and then

69:29

during the Trump presidency um he was to

69:33

me as a reporter it was very clear that

69:36

Ivanka and Jared were his two best

69:38

sources because every other day we'd see

69:41

some glowing picture of ianka or some

69:44

great piece about Jared who are getting

69:47

hit by all the other media and so you

69:49

know you can kind of tell as a reporter

69:50

who a guy's sources are when that

69:51

happens and then suddenly bubus like

69:55

2020 came around his coverage on Trump

69:57

changed even in Jared and Ivanka got

69:59

ignored Chris and what was it did do you

70:02

guys figure out why why did he turn on

70:04

Trump well we should emphasize how

70:07

important the Drudge Report was to the

70:09

Trump campaign uh Trump had been

70:11

courting drudge uh even since 2015

70:14

actually even few years before that

70:17

where he would leak uh things to Drudge

70:19

through certain uh spokespeople uh on

70:21

Election night um uh uh Bannon and Jared

70:25

Kushner called drudge on the phone for

70:28

advice for what to do with the exit

70:30

polls coming out showing that Trump

70:32

wasn't doing very well and drudge told

70:34

them said you know hold the line those

70:37

are BS polls Trump is going to win and

70:39

then in the aftermath of course drudge

70:42

was visiting the White House and was

70:44

speaking with the president um and his

70:46

staff quite often people saw him there

70:48

um certainly more than once so he was a

70:50

part of of that uh in more uh more cases

70:53

than just somebody influential in in the

70:55

media now the reasons that he turned on

70:58

Trump there's a lot of of of different

71:02

speculation but what we've heard from

71:03

the Trump White House is that there was

71:06

talk of U drudge not being happy with

71:09

Trump on immigration that was a certain

71:12

policy reason but we also have an

71:13

interview coming out very very soon with

71:15

a former Drudge Report editor named

71:18

Joseph curl who talks about how um

71:21

members of the Trump White House spoke

71:23

negatively about uh drudge and it got

71:26

back to him kind of took him for granted

71:28

said things kind of like well who needs

71:30

drudge who needs a blogger that kind of

71:32

talk and you know drudge has ears

71:35

everywhere he hears things if you say

71:38

something about him he will notice it

71:40

and that got back to him and so it could

71:42

have been a little bit of policy could

71:43

have been a little bit personal um but

71:45

it certainly was a mix that made him

71:47

turn against uh Trump in the

71:50

end I believe the immigration thing

71:53

because one thing I think we know is

71:56

that he's good friends with Anne couter

71:59

and Anne couter of course everybody now

72:02

knows has completely turned on Trump and

72:04

it's I mean if ever there were a single

72:06

issue voter it's an on immigration she's

72:10

it's she's devoted her life to this

72:12

issue and God she's been proven right

72:14

every day on her forecasts and um I

72:17

think she and uh she has Mickey cow on

72:20

all the time I I enjoy her her substack

72:23

and her submissions but I think she and

72:25

mickeey cows and um drudge share this

72:28

one issue as a true passion so it would

72:32

make sense because she was an Ardent

72:33

supporter of Trump's and what soured her

72:36

on him it was he didn't build a wall and

72:39

even though he did more certainly than

72:40

Biden has done on immigration he didn't

72:42

really get it done as as we can see

72:44

everything he got done got undone as

72:46

soon as he left

72:47

office Megan just to to follow up on

72:50

that we actually have an interview with

72:52

Mickey cow uh had hasn't aired yet where

72:54

he talks about a dinner that an drudge

72:58

he and he had after one of the debates

73:01

in 2016 so there's definitely a Nexus uh

73:04

he's not a stranger to Drudge either so

73:06

um you know that that that is certainly

73:08

part of it but I let me just add one

73:09

more thing that I think we heard uh to

73:11

to what Chris said about why he turned

73:13

on drudge I think those two are crucial

73:15

the third is I think people mistake

73:17

judge for a partisan uh kind of

73:19

Republican party oper uh operative

73:22

sometimes and he's not that he likes to

73:24

be different than what people think uh

73:26

there's a there's a clip from him on

73:27

cpan in in

73:31

200 1999 talking about Pap panan

73:34

entering the race saying oh this would

73:35

be interesting I think he always wants

73:38

to be interesting I think he wants to go

73:39

against the grain sometimes and you know

73:41

after supporting Trump what's more

73:42

Against the Grain than turning around

73:44

and showing that he's his own man and

73:46

doesn't necessarily need to follow Trump

73:47

and do the same thing four years later

73:49

so the podcast gets into his beginnings

73:51

and I didn't I didn't know any of this

73:53

but he apparently worked at CBS news for

73:56

a time always loved media always loved

73:58

news even as a kid grew up in the

74:00

Maryland area and got gets a job at CBS

74:04

News and starts pulling things out of

74:06

the garbage ratings and you have a bit

74:09

of that you have a a clip of the actual

74:11

drudge here's a clip for our audience

74:13

from your podcast of you Chris

74:15

introducing the clip and here's the clip

74:17

watch drudge started finding that CBS

74:20

staffers were tossing television rating

74:22

numbers in the track

74:23

before they were made public he went out

74:26

and dug them out here he is telling the

74:29

story during a speech in

74:31

1998 overhearing listening to

74:35

careful

74:37

conversations intercepting the

74:39

occasional memo would volunteer in the

74:41

mail room from time to time I hit Pay

74:44

Dirt when I discovered that the trash

74:46

cans in the Xerox room at television

74:48

city were stuffed each morning with

74:49

overnight neelon ratings information

74:52

gold

74:55

and it it wasn't CBS News it was the

74:57

price is right right price is right

74:59

where he worked for a time so

75:01

fascinating so just put some meat on

75:03

those bones

75:04

Chris well drudge knew a story when he

75:07

saw it you mentioned that he grew up in

75:09

uh Maryland right outside of Washington

75:11

DC in the shadow of the great

75:13

institution uh that was the Washington

75:15

Post right and I I think he uh idealized

75:18

it quite a bit and wanted to be part of

75:20

an institution like that um but uh do to

75:23

I I think you could argue educational or

75:25

class differences he never really was

75:27

welcomed into that club and I think he

75:29

always carried that with him that he

75:31

wasn't part of them so going out to

75:33

California um right at the Advent of the

75:36

internet he's using what we would see

75:37

now as a primitive computer in his

75:40

apartment uh this is the moment when The

75:42

Gatekeepers really started coming down

75:45

and a 20-some like Matt drudge could dig

75:47

something out of the trash and then

75:49

wouldn't have to get permission from an

75:51

editor he could post it on his own on

75:54

his own terms on his own website and

75:57

that is the key change and it was in

75:59

those seeds at CBS that we saw his

76:02

greatest scoop that really launched him

76:04

just a couple of years later when

76:06

Newsweek magazine had some details of

76:09

the Bill Clinton Monica Lewinsky SC

76:11

Scandal and then paused on publishing it

76:14

well Matt drudge got a hold of it and

76:16

published it real quick right on his

76:18

website and brust the news media uh very

76:21

quickly into the internet age realizing

76:24

that anyone could scoop these

76:26

institutions all the sudden and I

76:27

believe that clip that you played was

76:29

when drudge after releasing the Monica

76:32

Lewinsky story details going back to

76:35

Washington and speaking at the national

76:38

rest Club surrounded by the people who I

76:41

think he would argue in his mind

76:43

rejected him and saying hey I scooped

76:45

you and now things are changing and that

76:48

was the start of it all and now he

76:50

Scoops all the time I mean you know it's

76:52

it's wonderful when you get in a a clip

76:55

on The Drudge Report or a link to your

76:57

you know something you've done because

76:58

your volume of hits just goes through

77:00

the roof that's the power of His reach

77:03

um but yeah the Monica Linsky thing is

77:05

huge we'll we'll get to that in one

77:06

second um where he lives how to find him

77:10

how to actually lay eyes on him is

77:14

weirdly a huge mystery he doesn't want

77:18

attention and um you you talk about in

77:21

episode two this moment Chris where

77:24

you're at the Palm restaurant in

77:25

Washington DC and to me it's like Kaiser

77:28

so you know like you just you almost

77:33

almost had him but no what

77:36

happened well Jamie had gone into the

77:38

restaurant for dinner and the matro

77:41

rushed up to him and said you won't

77:42

believe who was just here and Jamie

77:44

saysi who you know somebody famous and

77:46

he says Matt drudge now it is remarkable

77:49

that a matro d would be so excited to

77:51

see somebody because they see

77:53

celebrities at the Palm all the time but

77:55

Matt drudge is someone so elusive so

77:57

mysterious that he's worth gossiping

77:59

about and talking about and then make

78:00

sure he spoke to us uh on the podcast

78:02

but it it is it did drive us a little

78:05

crazy that we had started this project

78:06

and we almost had him by I think 10 to

78:09

15 minutes uh Grudge also I want to say

78:11

came into the door didn't see anybody at

78:14

the front just kind of slipped in

78:15

quietly had a drink at the bar U people

78:18

noticed him they Googled his face they

78:20

said I can't believe it's him and then

78:21

before they could turn back around he

78:23

was gone this is really emblematic of

78:26

how he operates he appears in Washington

78:29

or he appears in a place and then he

78:31

just disappears on his own terms uh you

78:34

can never really nail him down you

78:36

mentioned how elusive he's been the guy

78:38

hasn't been photographed I believe in

78:40

over a decade uh when we spoke to Joseph

78:42

curl who was his staffer for four years

78:45

at their exit meeting before he left the

78:47

company Joe K said Hey brother can we

78:49

get a photo together and drudge said

78:51

absolutely not and he's never spoken to

78:53

him again and that's Matt I love it and

78:57

he's always got the Fedora on you know

78:58

which is kind of interesting because

78:59

that is a tell that he always does Megan

79:02

unless he wants to be recognized takes

79:05

that thing off and he's just a guy

79:07

walking around town and people don't

79:08

recognize him it's it's kind of like

79:10

Batman's mask you know you wouldn't know

79:12

it's Batman if he took it off that the

79:14

the Fedora in a way is his mask so one

79:17

of the people you talked to about drudge

79:20

was Tucker Carlson who's of course been

79:22

in conservative circles media circles

79:24

for his entire adult life and actually

79:26

before then um even when as was a kid

79:28

his dad worked in the media so that this

79:30

is a fascinating story and I'll play the

79:33

the audience a little clip you should

79:34

definitely download the podcast so you

79:35

can hear the full story um again finding

79:38

Matt drudge here it is from episode one

79:41

I remember having one conversation with

79:43

him we're talking about I was always

79:45

been fascinated by you know who is he

79:47

personally and somebody once said to me

79:49

that he had bought a bun maybe Breitbart

79:51

I think told me that he had bought a

79:52

bunch of land in Miami dat but kind of

79:54

on the outskirts far from Miami and it

79:57

built a a sort of Doomsday compound and

80:00

for the record I'm not against doomsday

80:02

compounds at all I I don't think that's

80:04

a crazy thing to do in the slightest I

80:06

think it's an admirable thing to do so I

80:07

wasn't mocking him but I asked about it

80:10

and he became so emotional and burst

80:13

into tears and started yelling at me and

80:15

I was going to betray him and tell

80:17

people about his compound and I suppose

80:20

he was right because now I am a lot of

80:22

people the media business really want to

80:23

be famous in fact it's the rule rather

80:26

than the exception and here was a guy at

80:28

the center of the media business at the

80:30

top of it who didn't want any attention

80:36

personally okay so you actually followed

80:39

up on the alleged compound and you've

80:41

got a story in the podcast about someone

80:44

who actually in 20120 found it went on

80:49

to the property which already seems

80:51

scary to me you like

80:53

it's somebody who doesn't want you there

80:55

and yet he did it so what what tell us

80:57

about that there was a reporter named

80:59

Bob Norman who was working on a story

81:01

about why drudge turned against Trump in

81:03

2020 and uh as a good reporter he

81:06

couldn't get comment over the phone or

81:08

over email so he drove over to drudge's

81:10

house he assumed there'd be a big gate

81:12

maybe he'd leave a note and the gate was

81:15

wide open so in Drive Bob Norman right

81:18

to Matt drudge's front door he steps out

81:21

knocks on the door uh no answer then so

81:25

he gets up and he leaves not long after

81:27

his telephone rings and who is it but

81:29

Matt drudge and he is furious couldn't

81:32

believe that this reporter would come

81:33

onto his property said he was going to

81:35

call the police uh said you know you

81:37

were brave for doing this you could have

81:39

been shot something could have happened

81:40

to you you know that kind of thing um

81:43

and uh what the reporter noted was that

81:46

drudge in a he said it was about a 30

81:49

minute phone conversation wouldn't stop

81:51

ranting about him coming on his property

81:54

e every time he Tred to turn the

81:56

conversation back to an interview about

81:57

the story he's writing drudge would just

81:59

come right back around and he actually

82:01

exasperated the reporter so much that he

82:04

just said please just

82:06

stop um now we did our own what's

82:08

interesting I have to tell you what's

82:10

interesting about this to me is the more

82:12

I live and the more I I meet very

82:15

successful people you know whether

82:16

they're extremely talented or they're

82:18

extremely hardworking or whatever

82:19

they've made a bunch of money and doing

82:20

something the more I realize that these

82:24

people tend to come in very interesting

82:25

and complex

82:26

packages and in in many of the cases and

82:31

I don't mean this pejoratively but

82:32

they're a little off socially you know I

82:35

honestly I could say the same about

82:36

myself I definitely have social anxiety

82:38

and I'm constantly a bull in a china

82:40

shop and saying the wrong thing but I

82:42

just think not to say I'm This brilliant

82:44

person I'm just saying like I can relate

82:45

to you might be very strong at one thing

82:48

and like kind of not so strong at

82:50

another and he's that to the extreme

82:52

right he started this with no support no

82:55

connections just this sort of aggregated

82:58

news source and then he's for all these

83:00

years been so incredibly powerful to

83:02

this day I check the Drudge Report every

83:04

morning and I love that you're looking

83:05

into whether it's still Matt behind it

83:07

because I have wondered and you you know

83:09

and you actually conclude it's him that

83:12

like we'll know when Matt drudge is no

83:14

longer interested in doing this how will

83:16

we know

83:17

Jamie well uh Chris interviews some

83:20

people that were at Andrew breber fun

83:22

and of course uh Andrew helped uh edit

83:25

the Drudge Report uh when drudge needed

83:27

someone to stand in for him back in the

83:30

very beginning uh and drudge shows up

83:32

and the the some of the the Breitbart

83:35

staffers there who are just about to

83:36

launch actually breitbart's website uh

83:40

talk to him and they say uh I you know

83:43

uh he well he asked them actually he

83:45

goes uh what are you going to call the

83:47

website now uh and they go well we're

83:49

going to call it Breitbart he goes

83:51

really you're going to call call it

83:52

Breitbart but breitbart's pass he goes

83:54

yeah but we want to honor uh Andrew

83:56

Breitbart this what we're going to call

83:57

it we're going to continue on and he

83:58

said well that won't be for me when I'm

84:00

gone that website is done so when you

84:04

know basically gives the answer to the

84:05

question we're trying to to answer

84:07

whether he still works on the site

84:09

there's also you know other information

84:10

we have to to show that he does uh but

84:13

he will not be that site will not exist

84:16

if Matt drudge is is not working on it

84:18

that's basically uh what he said well on

84:21

the subject of the house Chris it looked

84:23

like I haven't seen it personally but I

84:25

know we have some video and he's putting

84:26

it up for sale now so I think it's okay

84:28

to to show it but it wasn't is a nice

84:31

house but it mattra has got to have tens

84:35

of millions of dollars there's just no

84:37

question he's a

84:38

multi-millionaire thanks to what's

84:40

happened with The Drudge Report I don't

84:42

know did you expect him to be living

84:44

more

84:47

elaborately well one thing about this

84:49

house is that the the price is in the

84:51

location it is secluded you cannot see

84:54

it from Google Earth it is covered in

84:56

green it is invisible from above uh you

84:59

cannot see it from the road it is tucked

85:02

away it's almost built into the Earth is

85:04

how Bob Norman described it um it it's a

85:07

place where somebody who wanted to get

85:09

away and not be bothered would certainly

85:11

go you know he used to have a place uh

85:12

closer to downtown Miami Beach and those

85:14

kinds of places um but he he just wanted

85:17

to get away from that exposure uh and

85:19

you did mention that that house is for

85:21

sale and it went up for sale

85:22

right uh in the middle of us doing this

85:25

podcast and uh the descriptions have

85:27

changed they've added more exclamation

85:30

points and more references to why this

85:31

seller is very motivated so we don't

85:33

know why he wanted to get rid of it um

85:36

but one one can speculate but I will say

85:38

I should reiterate that they put this

85:40

online he put this online through his

85:41

realtor they they want you to see it's

85:43

not our video we would no no it's not

85:44

like you secretly got in there no no no

85:47

but um he he also is known to live

85:49

around the world do you never know where

85:51

he actually is his staffers never know

85:55

where he is he could just be in Israel

85:58

he could be in Arizona he could be in

86:00

Florida um he has properties he spents a

86:02

lot of time in Las Vegas he likes to get

86:05

really fancy suits U Matt leack his

86:07

biography his biographer has reported uh

86:10

and so he's a person that likes to move

86:12

around and and that I think when when

86:14

you mention like hey this you know this

86:16

isn't look like a palacial mansion or

86:17

anything it's like well you know he has

86:19

other priorities and he has other

86:20

properties too and was a beautiful home

86:23

I just know I mean he's got to be one of

86:25

the richest men in media I when down in

86:27

Miami you could go big you could go

86:28

right in the ocean um okay stand by

86:31

we're gonna take a quick break right do

86:33

we need a break no we don't actually

86:34

never mind we're we're good I I forgot

86:36

we squeezed R in after Dave Mike okay so

86:38

I I'm going to get to two things we have

86:39

to talk about mon Lewinsky and then I

86:41

will tell you about the time I met Matt

86:44

drudge in person in the conversation

86:45

that we had um so Monica lewitzky is

86:48

really what put drudge on the map and

86:51

you point out in the show most people

86:53

think Matt drudge broke that story and

86:57

he did he did break the Monica piece of

87:00

it did he not because I'll tell you my

87:02

experience of this I mean I was not

87:03

media I was just a kid um but I was a

87:07

lawyer and shortly thereafter when I got

87:10

to Fox News in 2004 Brit Hume told me

87:12

this personally that the reason Special

87:14

Report launched the night it did was

87:17

because drudge broke uh the Monica

87:20

Lewinsky story and they understood at

87:23

Fox this was huge and they had no choice

87:28

but to like fire up an engine the

87:30

Special Report show that they were not

87:32

yet ready to put on the air but there

87:33

you know Fox is kind it was a startup to

87:35

begin with they're like let's do

87:37

it you know so they did it and the show

87:39

is still going strong and now hosted by

87:41

our friend Brett Bear anyway Matt drudge

87:44

got that whole thing started and I see

87:46

in the piece Michael isakov who writes

87:47

for Newsweek who actually had the story

87:50

but was told by his publisher Newsweek

87:51

to hold it he's kind of like he didn't

87:54

really break it you know I broke the

87:56

piece about being investigated by the

87:58

justice department for lot you know but

88:01

it really was a Matt drudge thing well

88:04

Matt drudge pushed it into the open in a

88:06

way that Newsweek was hesitant to do

88:08

there were lots of details swirling

88:10

around at this time um and yeah in the

88:13

finer points isakov had quite a few

88:15

Scoops and he's a fantastic reporter

88:16

he's now at Yahoo news um but the the

88:19

point with with drudge was that Drudge

88:22

made this story impossible to ignore

88:26

there was no more hey should we hold

88:27

this story should we check it everyone

88:29

had to run after the story television

88:33

shows had to be launched you know it

88:36

thrust the ships to War as it were um in

88:39

a way that U might not have happened in

88:41

such an Abrupt way it could have been a

88:43

little drip drip leakier we don't we

88:45

don't exactly know but what it certainly

88:47

did um was put Legacy news organizations

88:51

on their toes

88:52

and they realize in the internet age if

88:55

we don't break this somebody else will

88:57

and I think it pushed us into a digital

89:00

era that we were in a different Universe

89:03

before drudge broke this and for that

89:06

you could tile the biography of that

89:07

drudge GameChanger I mean you really

89:09

could it could just be called

89:10

GameChanger because he really has been

89:12

here's isakov from the podcast um this

89:15

is a clip from episode two finding Matt

89:17

drudge where isakov talks about it all

89:20

take a listen you had this scoop and why

89:24

was it not run why was it delayed

89:28

basically they were

89:30

nervous I mean the editors you know this

89:33

was like they wanted to know everything

89:35

but like well wait second like you know

89:37

can we really report that

89:40

Clinton you know has been having an

89:44

affair with an

89:46

intern the story was going to come out

89:49

it's question of how and when right but

89:52

the fundamentals were already there it

89:55

was just too explosive they couldn't

89:57

handle it was too big to

90:05

report well done so I mean kudos to him

90:08

because he did do great reporting on it

90:09

it was just Newsweek that didn't that

90:11

didn't have the appetite and so that's

90:13

the thing about drudge because he puts

90:14

up the red siren above the Drudge Report

90:17

and everyone in news is like holy

90:20

drudge has got the siren up we all have

90:22

to pay attention and one day uh he did

90:26

that involving yours truly and this

90:29

would lead to my encounter with him so

90:31

it was

90:33

2013 and uh my son Thatcher had just

90:36

been born in July and I had struck a

90:40

deal with Roger alses to when I returned

90:43

from maternity leave join the Fox News

90:45

Prime Time and take over the 9:00 p.m.

90:47

spot and it was to be kept secret I

90:51

certainly wasn't going to blab it to

90:53

anyone I didn't want to screw up my own

90:54

career across my boss in that way and um

90:58

I was online one day in our little

91:00

townhouse we had and boom there was the

91:03

news on The Drudge Report and I remember

91:06

like holy oh my God like how does he

91:08

know because I knew and Roger knew and

91:11

almost nobody else knew and uh it said

91:14

something like Megan to Prime Time and I

91:18

never found out but shortly thereafter

91:20

some it must have been you know between

91:22

13 and 17 cuz that's when I left Fox I

91:24

saw Matt Matt drudge in The Green Room

91:28

outside of Shan Hannity Studio on a

91:29

night he he I think he was going on

91:31

Hannity and uh I said Matt drudge like

91:35

how you doing I said someday you're

91:38

going to have to tell me who told you

91:41

that news and he said I promise you

91:44

someday I will tell you and that then I

91:47

haven't seen him again so I'm really

91:49

kind of hoping that somay it was like

91:51

maybe maybe after the person dies he

91:53

didn't tell me what the condition would

91:54

be but he felt like he was in a position

91:55

to actually at some point share it with

91:57

me which I'd love to know if he gets

91:59

back to me you know I I'll let you know

92:01

but anyway uh it's just another

92:03

Testament of how he gets stuff no one

92:08

has yeah he he is remarkable at that and

92:11

I I think Chris in one of the episodes I

92:13

believe it talks about how Trump

92:15

secretly would have things leaked to him

92:17

after telling people you know don't

92:19

don't leak this anywhere keep this

92:20

secret but when the are shut he would

92:22

have someone give it give it over to

92:24

Drudge and part two Curry favor uh with

92:27

with someone he viewed as so influential

92:30

who which is Matt drudge and which is

92:32

why uh from the very beginning of his

92:34

campaign as Chris mentioned they try to

92:36

court drudge as a supporter and it

92:38

certainly worked in the beginning and he

92:40

would send drudge personal Notes too oh

92:43

I'm sorry Trump would write personal

92:46

notes to Drudge uh he would have the

92:48

Drudge Report does yeah I got one myself

92:51

it's on my office desk here uh but he

92:53

would print The Drudge Report and then

92:55

write little notes like great story

92:56

drudge you know I mean the the personal

92:58

um attempt was was very real and going

93:01

after him what Donald Trump was sending

93:03

me when I was in the prime time of fox

93:05

almost invariably were stories about

93:08

himself in the newspaper that he would

93:11

then sign and just mail him to me

93:15

like okay thank you and but he would

93:18

call me also to compliment various news

93:20

segments he had seen The Kelly File I

93:23

have one from Trump that says Chris

93:24

you're a bad

93:26

reporter sign Donald Trump with love um

93:30

okay can we just spend one second

93:32

because we're talking about Monica

93:32

Lewinsky and the in the whole Bill

93:34

Clinton affair she's actually back in

93:36

the news do you guys see

93:38

this I don't know I don't know if you've

93:40

seen this but she just got the L

93:42

treatment she's got this huge spread in

93:44

L

93:45

magazine as like the next

93:49

supermodel and these young young people

93:52

over on Tik Tok Etc are reacting to her

93:55

as though she is a hero she's Mo she's

93:58

modeling Reformation clothing and they

94:02

are the Young Folks today are so

94:04

incredibly excited about Monica Lewinsky

94:07

who for the young people watching this

94:09

show is famous or I do believe the word

94:12

is Infamous for having an affair with a

94:14

married man who happened to be the

94:16

president of the United States whom she

94:17

admitted to aggressively courting by

94:19

showing him her thong and bragged about

94:21

her quote presidential knee pads before

94:24

she had even met him um so she was

94:26

excited to go into the White House and

94:28

get it on with the all to willing

94:30

sitting president of the United States

94:33

she was outed one thing led to another

94:35

he lied about it under oath and he was

94:38

impeached but not convicted similar to

94:39

Trump and um sh her name became

94:43

synonymous with that's what

94:44

happened I mean that's all she gave him

94:47

they didn't have actual conventional sex

94:49

and to get a Lewinsky became synonymous

94:52

with getting a which was

94:53

embarrassing I'm sure for her but now

94:55

she's resurfacing as like the new

94:56

heroine to the young folks today I'll

94:58

give you a a sample of uh one of these

95:01

ticktockers I don't know 19 or 20

95:03

whatever you guys think is better I am

95:05

not going to lie I had zero idea who

95:08

this woman was so I had to do a little

95:10

bit of research and this is Monica

95:13

Lewinsky and she's pretty iconic so she

95:16

is the woman that Bill Clinton had an

95:20

affair with the woman where Hillary

95:22

Clinton got cheated on but Reformation

95:25

basically partnered with Monica Lewinsky

95:27

and voter.org to bring awareness with

95:30

voting for the election for 2024 so this

95:33

collab is truly iconic the fact that she

95:36

is promoting voting well she had a

95:38

literal affair with Bill Clinton icon

95:41

Legend like get that bag but can we take

95:44

a moment for the red dress the red

95:46

tights like I know Hillary Clinton is

95:48

shaking in her boots right now like I

95:51

know Bill Clinton is peeping like he's

95:53

lurking he's like oh that's Monica

95:56

Lewinsky she looking absolutely fire

95:59

Pooky oh my

96:02

God I'm sorry I'm gonna be honest I

96:05

prefer my female Heroes to have actually

96:08

done something heroic for womenkind I

96:12

okay I'm glad Monica Lewinsky is doing

96:14

okay but she's not it Jamie thoughts

96:17

well first of all the language just

96:19

makes me feel old collab and get that

96:21

bag I mean this this is a this is a

96:24

different era I guess I am I am getting

96:26

older I don't

96:29

know to say to that uh it's so bizarre

96:32

that that Monica Linsky is being uh

96:34

brought out again so long you know so

96:37

much so many years later my only thought

96:38

is that hopefully that boodes well for

96:40

the show if people are figuring out

96:41

about Monica lsky maybe uh drudge uh

96:44

podcast but will be uh next up their

96:46

alley I don't I don't get it are we so

96:49

desperate do we run out of actual Heroes

96:51

like actual heroins there are actual

96:53

women out there right now doing great

96:54

things for America I'm glad she's back

96:56

on her feet and I'm glad back in her

96:58

2015 special the black and white thing

97:01

she took responsibility for her terrible

97:03

decision-making these were no ordinary

97:05

mistakes yes every 22-year-old makes

97:07

mistakes these were not ordinary ones

97:09

you're having an affair with a sitting

97:10

president of the United States while his

97:12

wife the first lady is you know upstairs

97:14

and you know you're you're jeopardizing

97:16

the the country in a in a way this was a

97:19

huge one so she deserved some time on

97:22

the sidelines doesn't mean she should

97:23

never work again in her life but she's

97:25

not a heroine this is so weird I don't

97:27

get it young people seem desperate to

97:29

prop up anybody who's been through

97:32

anything as a hero because they don't

97:34

allow themselves to go through anything

97:37

anymore even the bad words they can't

97:40

hear and discussions about abortion are

97:42

they need trigger warnings reading the

97:44

founding documents they wanted a trigger

97:46

warning at the National Archives I mean

97:47

we could keep going so in any event keep

97:49

looking go Monica I I love you know I

97:52

love that you you keep trying to

97:54

reinvent yourself and keep coming into

97:56

the national news every other year

97:58

saying this is the first time but anyway

98:01

um it all started with Matt drudge so

98:04

what do you guys make of it now because

98:06

media over the what 20 years that he's

98:08

been doing this has changed

98:10

dramatically does he have I know we

98:13

talked about number five media and all

98:15

that but does he have the same influence

98:17

now especially given how the Republican

98:20

Party feels about Trump

98:21

as he used to well you mentioned Megan

98:24

that Fox News was always reading him uh

98:27

in the studio and everything but it

98:28

wasn't just Fox News it was all the

98:30

networks it was ABC CBS NBC all the

98:33

reporters mainstream left and right uh

98:35

to your question though of of has he

98:38

declined a little bit in in um his

98:40

influence I would say certainly so the

98:42

internet has changed uh drudge is where

98:44

you used to go to see the latest news

98:47

you would refresh it you would hit

98:48

refresh refresh refresh to find

98:49

something new but now that's on social

98:52

media that's on Twitter X that's places

98:54

like that and so that has kind of

98:56

supplanted it a little bit and and um

98:58

also his his reporting has kind of

99:00

slowed down a little bit it's a lot more

99:02

aggregation and fewer Scoops than he

99:04

used to have um but I think it's okay

99:06

for a site like that to enter a new

99:08

season uh I'll tell you why I really

99:10

love going to the Drudge Report is

99:11

because so much of my media diet is run

99:14

by an algorithm I desperately want a

99:16

creative interesting person to find

99:19

stories for me to read and say hey I

99:20

think you'll like this and not because

99:22

of who you are but because who I am who

99:24

I am as the editor and I think that is

99:26

what is going to make him stand up that

99:27

human touch that he has um even if he

99:30

doesn't have the influence that he did

99:32

maybe 10 15 years ago he still certainly

99:34

matters I agree he's done so much for

99:37

the news industry for causes I hold dear

99:40

um for the media coverage and media in

99:42

general that I'm grateful to the guy

99:44

enatic though he may be that that is

99:47

kind of part of his Allure you guys can

99:49

hear more at finding Matt drudge new

99:52

podcast available on all platforms guys

99:54

thanks for being here thank you for

99:56

having us Megan really appreciate it all

99:58

right and we'll see all of you tomorrow

100:00

with the latest on the fanny Willis

100:02

hearing starts at

100:06

9:

Rate This
★
★
★
★
★

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Media EvolutionMatt DrudgeNews IndustryJournalism ImpactDigital MediaPolitical ReportingMonica LewinskyMedia FiguresConservative MediaMedia Secrets
日本語の芁玄は必芁ですか