The KinGrinder P1: Why A Cheap Hand Grinder Has Me A Little Excited
Summary
TLDRIn this engaging video, the presenter discusses the KINGrinder P1 hand grinder, a budget-friendly coffee grinder that offers impressive quality for its price point. The video begins with a comparison to the Hario Slim, a long-standing affordable option, but notes its limitations due to alignment issues and ceramic burr quality. The KINGrinder P1, priced at £33, is highlighted for its metal burr and polycarbonate construction, providing a more premium feel and better grinding experience. The presenter conducts a particle size analysis and taste tests, revealing that despite producing more fines, the KINGrinder's grind profile results in a surprisingly good cup of coffee. The video also touches on the grinder's ergonomics, comparing it favorably to more expensive models. While the KINGrinder P1 may not be ideal for espresso, the presenter is genuinely excited about its performance and value, encouraging viewers to share their experiences and consider this grinder as a great starting point for home coffee enthusiasts.
Takeaways
- ð€ The KINGrinder P1 hand grinder is a budget-friendly option that has sparked excitement due to its potential quality at an affordable price point.
- ð The Hario Slim, a long-time budget grinder, has been a go-to for beginners but has limitations in grind quality and alignment.
- ð The KINGrinder P1 offers a step up in quality and ergonomics from the Hario Slim, despite a similar price range.
- ð Particle size analysis showed that the KINGrinder produced more fines, which typically indicates a less desirable grind, but taste tests revealed a more nuanced outcome.
- ð Taste tests indicated that the KINGrinder P1's grind quality was closer to the high-end Comandante grinder than the Hario Slim.
- ð° The value proposition of the KINGrinder P1 is significant, suggesting that one can achieve a high-quality coffee experience without a high-end grinder.
- ð ïž The build quality of the KINGrinder P1 is impressive for its price, featuring a metal burr and polycarbonate construction.
- â The grind size adjustability of the KINGrinder P1 allows for a range of brewing methods, including espresso, despite some challenges in achieving the ideal grind for espresso.
- ð The KINGrinder P1's particle size distribution, although higher in fines, did not negatively impact the taste as much as expected, suggesting that grind size is not the only factor in coffee quality.
- ð The Hario Slim was found to leave larger, less desirable grind sizes in the coffee bed after brewing, which impacted the extraction and taste.
- ð The KINGrinder P1 represents an innovation in affordable coffee grinders, providing a better experience and outcome for those starting their coffee journey.
Q & A
What is the name of the hand grinder discussed in the transcript?
-The hand grinder discussed is called the KINGrinder P1.
What is the price range of the Hario Slim hand grinder mentioned?
-The Hario Slim hand grinder is mentioned to be around £30.
What are the different burr shapes available for the KINGrinder P1 grinder?
-The KINGrinder P1 grinder offers hexagonal, heptagonal, and possibly pentagonal burr shapes.
What material is the construction of the KINGrinder P1 grinder?
-The construction of the KINGrinder P1 grinder is polycarbonate, with a metal handle and a wooden end piece.
How does the KINGrinder P1 compare to the Hario Slim in terms of feel and quality for the price?
-The KINGrinder P1 feels nicer and offers a better quality experience than the Hario Slim for a price point that is only slightly higher (£33 compared to £30).
What is a particle size analyzer and how was it used in the comparison?
-A particle size analyzer is a machine that measures the size and shape of coffee particles by feeding in hundreds of thousands of them. It was used to compare the grind profiles of the KINGrinder P1, Hario Slim, and Comandante grinders.
What was the surprising result from the particle size analysis of the KINGrinder P1?
-The surprising result was that despite the KINGrinder P1 producing more fines than the other grinders, it still tasted considerably better than the Hario Slim.
How did the taste test compare the KINGrinder P1 to the Hario Slim and Comandante?
-The taste test revealed that the KINGrinder P1 was closer in quality to the Comandante, which is a more expensive grinder, than it was to the Hario Slim.
What is the KINGrinder P1's performance like when attempting to grind for espresso?
-The KINGrinder P1 can be adjusted to a finer setting for espresso, but it may not be its forte. The resulting espresso was described as quite acidic, lacking in sweetness and texture.
What is the author's final recommendation regarding the KINGrinder P1 grinder?
-The author is impressed with the KINGrinder P1 and recommends it for those wanting to start grinding their own coffee at an affordable price point, despite it not being as good as more expensive hand grinders.
What is the significance of the KINGrinder P1 grinder's price in relation to its performance?
-The significance is that the KINGrinder P1 offers a good quality grinder experience at a low price of £33, which is a great starting point for individuals interested in home coffee grinding without breaking the bank.
Outlines
ð Introduction to KINGrinder P1 Hand Grinder
The speaker introduces the KINGrinder P1 hand grinder, expressing excitement about its potential. They compare it to the Hario Slim, a cheaper grinder they've sold for many years. The Hario Slim, while affordable at £30, has limitations such as ceramic burrs and misalignment, leading to an inconsistent grind. The KINGrinder P1, costing £33, is presented as an interesting alternative that offers a hexagonal metal burr and polycarbonate construction with a metal handle. The speaker also mentions higher-end options like the Comandante, which are significantly more expensive. They discuss the importance of particle size analysis in evaluating grinders and share initial findings that the KINGrinder produces more fines, which was surprising given its price point.
ð€ Ergonomics and Taste Test of Different Grinders
The speaker discusses the ergonomic differences between the Hario Slim, the KINGrinder P1, and the Comandante. They note the Hario Slim's slim body is easy to grip, but the KINGrinder feels more substantial and easier to use, despite its lower price. A taste test is conducted with three 1 cup V60 brews, each made with a different grinder set to achieve about a 21.3% extraction. The KINGrinder's coffee is found to be less acidic and more balanced than the Hario Slim's, leading the speaker to conclude that the KINGrinder is closer in quality to the Comandante than the Hario, despite its lower price.
ð Particle Size Distribution and Espresso Testing
The speaker theorizes that the KINGrinder's better taste, despite producing more fines, may be due to fewer large 'boulder' particles that don't contribute to extraction. They discuss the importance of particle size distribution and how it can be misleading without taste data. The KINGrinder's claim to produce an espresso grind is tested. The speaker uses a power drill to adjust the grind setting, highlighting the difficulty of dialing in espresso with a hand grinder. The resulting espresso from the KINGrinder is found to be acidic and lacking in sweetness and texture, suggesting that it may not be the grinder's strong suit.
ð Conclusion and Recommendations
The speaker concludes that the KINGrinder P1 is a significant improvement over the Hario Slim and offers excellent value for its price. They express excitement about the grinder's capability and recommend it for those looking to start grinding their own coffee. The KINGrinder is praised for its user experience, quality of grind, and the potential for users to enhance their coffee journey without breaking the bank. The speaker acknowledges the grinder's limitations, particularly for espresso, but emphasizes its impressive performance for the price. They invite viewers to share their experiences and thoughts on the grinder in the comments.
Mindmap
Keywords
ð¡KINGrinder P1
ð¡Hario Slim
ð¡Particle Size Analysis
ð¡Comandante Grinder
ð¡Ergonomics
ð¡Polycarbonate Construction
ð¡Metal Burr
ð¡Extraction
ð¡Fines
ð¡Channeling
ð¡Affiliate Link
Highlights
Introduction to the KINGrinder P1 hand grinder, a budget-friendly option that has the presenter excited.
Comparison with the Hario Slim, the long-time cheapest hand grinder on the market.
Discussion of the Hario Slim's limitations, such as its alignment issues and ceramic burr.
Mention of the availability of more expensive, high-quality hand grinders.
Discovery of the KINGrinder P1 through a video by Dmitriy Yurchenko.
Description of the KINGrinder P1's features, including its metal burr and polycarbonate construction.
Surprise at the quality of the KINGrinder P1 for its price point.
Particle size analysis comparison between the KINGrinder P1, Hario Slim, and Comandante grinders.
Unexpected results from the particle size analysis, with the KINGrinder producing more fines.
Conducting a taste test to compare the grind quality beyond particle size analysis.
Ergonomic differences between the Hario Slim and KINGrinder P1 during the grinding process.
Observation of the brewing bed after using the KINGrinder P1, noting a less muddy appearance.
Blind taste test results, with the KINGrinder P1 rated closer to the expensive Comandante grinder.
Consideration of the value for money, suggesting the KINGrinder P1 is a great starting point for coffee enthusiasts.
Discussion on the importance of quality coffee beans and water for a great cup of coffee, rather than just the grinder.
Surprise that the KINGrinder P1 tastes better than expected despite the high fines from particle size analysis.
Attempt to grind for espresso using the KINGrinder P1 and the challenges faced.
Conclusion that while the KINGrinder P1 may not be the best for espresso, it offers impressive value for its price.
Final recommendation of the KINGrinder P1 for those looking to start grinding their own coffee without breaking the bank.
Transcripts
- Today we're gonna talk about this.
It's a hand grinder from a company called KINGrinder.
KINgrinder, I don't know,
KINGrinder, called the P1.
And it's a grinder that has me feeling
a little bit excited in a funny sort of way.
Now, to explain why I wanna talk about this grinder,
I need to talk about a different grinder just quickly.
This is the Hario Slim, the mini mill, whatever it is.
It's the cheapest hand grinder
that was around for a really long time.
I've worked in coffee for maybe 20 years.
I've probably sold these for 15 years, let's say.
Sold a lot of them because they were about £30
and for someone who wanted to start grinding coffee,
this was the cheapest way
you could get grinding coffee at home, right?
Like, with a burr grinder, not with like a blade grinder.
Now these are cheap, £30 is not expensive.
They're not great though.
It's a ceramic burr inside this.
It's a conical ceramic burr.
And the sort of shaft through the middle
from the handle down to the burr,
there's a bit of play in that.
So it's not well aligned and it moves around
and it doesn't create a particularly good grind profile.
Now hand grinders have gotten good, let's just say that,
like there's lots of fancy hand grinders
out there in the world.
You can easily spend a couple of hundred pounds
on a hand grinder, which is a lot more than 30.
Then I saw these.
I was put onto a video
by a guy called Dmitriy Yurchenko
through my sort of Patreon-only Discord.
And he was talking about these grinders
in a way that made me kind of interested
because this grinder here is £33
on Jeffrey Bezos's website.
We'll link to this down below,
but it won't be an affiliate link.
So, you know, feel free to click around down below.
Anyway, this is the P1.
They do a P0, which is cheaper than this,
a P1 and then they do a P2
and it's to do with the number of kind of cutting blades
and the shape of the burr inside.
So this is a sort of hexagonal burr.
They do a heptagonal burr for a little bit more money.
And then a pentagonal burr, is that the word I want?
Maybe it isn't, I don't know, five blades kind of thing.
It's a metal burr.
The construction is polycarbonate.
The handle is metal.
This nice little wood bit on the end feels nice.
Now this arrived
and immediately I was like, "Oh, this is nice."
This is nicer than I would expect for £33
where my benchmark is this at 30,
because this doesn't, it doesn't feel great.
It turns beans into pieces of beans,
but it isn't a great grinder.
This seems to be symptomatic
of something that gets me a little bit excited,
which is coffee stuff
has definitely gotten more expensive, right?
Like, the most expensive grinders in the world right now
are probably for the home, right?
This kind of boom in domestic coffee consumption
has supported more expensive espresso machines,
fancy grinders, all of the sort of fancy stuff,
expensive stuff.
But, the idea that this might be good
at the same price point as this,
that gets me excited in a very different way
because if this is good,
well, that's a great starting point
for someone who wants to dip a toe.
I feel okay saying spend £33 on a hand grinder,
especially if it doesn't suck.
Now we're very fortunate here,
downstairs in our sort of testing facility,
not that you know that I'm upstairs, but it's downstairs,
we have a particle size analyzer.
And so straight away, I grabbed some coffee from this,
from this and also
from this, it's a Comandante.
This though is a good benchmark
of a good expensive hand grinder.
These are at least £200, which is a lot more than 33.
And so it seemed an interesting comparison
and that's where it got weird.
That's where it was unexpected
and honestly a little disappointing.
Particle size analysis,
it's important to understand what it is.
We have a machine that you feed in hundreds of thousands
of coffee particles to it.
It looks at the size and shape of them
and it gives you a distribution of the size and shape.
When you are looking at particle size information
and charts and distributions,
know that this is that grinder on that setting that day
with a particular coffee, right?
Like, it's not a statement of truth
about how a grinder works.
It's a moment of comparison between two grinders
or three grinders set to produce, let's say,
similar extractions in a 1 cup V60.
It's important.
And when I looked at the data,
initially, I was like, "Oh."
Because this thing produces lots more fines.
If you look at the surface area,
which you can do in the charting,
a lot more surface area from the ground coffee is exposed
from very fine pieces with the KINGrinder.
You could see that the Comandante had less fines,
had less big pieces too, sort of very large pieces,
than either of these grinders.
And so I was like, "That's disappointing.
Maybe it isn't any good.
Maybe it's no better than this grinder here."
Then we did a taste test, which I'm gonna replicate next
because in the taste test,
well, it wasn't as clear cut anymore.
I was confused by what I tasted.
So I'm gonna do it again, this time on camera.
What we're gonna do
is we'll make three 1 cup V60 with these,
well, they're all set to produce about a 21.3% extraction.
It doesn't really matter.
They all taste pretty good
at that kind of extraction level typically.
That's a nice place to aim for
if you're into the nerdy stuff, which we are.
I'm gonna brew them one at a time
and then put them in thermoses
to try and mitigate the sort of the heat issue.
Then we'll put them into cupping bowls.
We'll mix them up, I'll taste them blind
and we'll see what the difference in taste is.
So, as I grind each one of these,
it's an interesting chance
to talk about the sort of ergonomic differences
in these different price points.
(coffee grinding)
The Hario is good and bad.
This slim body here
does make it nicer to hold and to grip onto.
This thing here, I'm not a big fan.
(coffee grinding)
Oh.
Miserable,
like hard work.
Now the capacity of this is obviously a lot less.
This is fuller.
There's a smaller space for beans compared to this.
But the idea that you might fill this grinder
all seems alien to me considering how long it took me
to grind 15 grams just then.
(coffee grinding)
Now you can hear it straight away
that's a metal burr inside and it's quicker
and easier.
We done?
Wooden handle, nice to hold.
Metal handle, nice to turn.
At basically the same price point,
the experience ergonomically is massively different
and, you know, this was when I started
to get a little bit excited about this grinder.
(coffee grinding)
Does that sound better or worse?
There's a question for you.
(coffee grinding)
Feels a little bit easier to turn,
but it also feels like the throughput is a little bit less.
Honestly, I mean, the wooden handle piece on the metal thing
doesn't feel any better or fancier
or easier to grind with than this.
I know it's got this little angle piece.
I don't really think I feel a...
Hmm, a bit more bonus coffee.
I don't think I feel I'd necessarily benefit from that.
You know, this is a metal construction, it feels fancier.
It feels heavier.
Yeah, interesting.
In terms of experience,
if there's a sliding scale from cheap to expensive,
this is much closer to expensive.
We're gonna be using the Better 1 cup V60 Technique
that we published on this channel.
There's a link to that video in the description.
Interestingly, if you look at the Hario's bed
at the end of the brewing,
you can just see lots of large pieces,
really quite big chunks of coffee,
borderline coffee grounds, you know,
to just pieces of coffee sat on the top
and around the filter paper itself.
I think this is important.
So with the KINGrinder bed,
it looks a kind of muddier bed, which makes sense.
It seems to have more fines,
but there's less of the kind of crunchy granola pieces
kind of lying around on top.
Again, worth noting.
End bed: doesn't look as muddy as the KINGrinder.
There's a few larger pieces
but nothing like the chunky rocks from the Hario Slim.
So let's decant.
And then Michael will come in, switch 'em around.
I won't know what I'm tasting. let's find out what's good.
On first pass,
it tastes the thinnest and the sort of most acidic
and just astringent as well.
My gut is that that's the Hario Slim.
I don't know why,
but I just feel like it's just got the least going on.
It's kind of comparably strong
and therefore technically comparably extracted.
But the nature of that extraction
feels like there were bigger pieces at play
in this cup than other ones.
This is a very balanced and very tasty cup.
I don't really feel there's a lot to complain about here.
Sweetness is nice.
The acidity is nice.
That's a nice cup.
If that's the Hario, this video is a waste of time. (laughs)
This cup is not bad, right?
Like, I would say it's not as good as this cup,
but it's not bad.
It's much better than this cup.
Like, much better than this cup.
I would say, this is my least favorite.
This is my most favorite.
And this is just in second place.
It's the Hario.
Do you know I'm quite relieved?
I'm quite relieved. (laughing)
He's giving me nothing off camera.
Right, that's the Hario.
That's the Comandante.
And this is the KING.
And I would say,
if we had a sliding scale of like not great to great
and we have the Hario down this end at not great
and the Comandante at great, this is much closer
to the Comandante than it is to the Hario.
I think that's the thing, for three more pounds
or five more dollars
or whatever it's gonna be in the US,
we will check that and put it on screen.
Here's the thing I would think about.
If you gave me £250, right?
I then might have, say I buy a Comandante
and I've got 50 quid, £50 left for coffee spend.
Or I could spend £33 on a grinder
and have a lot more budget to buy better coffees.
Because that's really, at this point here,
what's gonna kind of truly elevate your morning coffee
is the quality of what you put into it.
If you put good water and good ground coffee,
ground fresh and reasonably well, into a V60,
you can get very, very, very tasty coffee.
And the gap in quality, it's not reflected by price.
And that's really interesting to me.
This is a better grinder.
There's no question about it whatsoever.
And that's a relief really.
For £200, it better be a better grinder.
It's better on the particle size analysis.
I think that's a better cup of coffee.
But this, this makes me happy
because it makes me feel like I could recommend something
that's £33 and really
someone could go and make a coffee
that they would really enjoy at the end of it.
Yeah, there's runway. You could go and you could improve it
and you can tweak it and you can have a journey into coffee,
down the rabbit hole,
but you are starting so much further along
than you would be with this.
And I think that's a really big deal.
Now, this thing claims it can do espresso,
but before we do that and test that and play with that,
I should finish off my theory on particle size distribution
and why this tastes better than it should on paper.
If you recall, it produced way more fines
than either of these two grinders,
much more than this, but even more than the Slim,
and yet I think it tastes considerably better than the Slim.
I think we get hung up on fines
and in grinders like this at grind settings like this,
that may be the wrong thing to think about.
You can look at the data a whole host of different ways,
and this is called a cumulative undersize chart,
which shows you the percentage of coffee
underneath a fixed size, right?
And so with this grinder,
pretty much everything is under 1,500 microns.
It's still making the odd single large piece.
That kind of happens, that's fine.
But if you compare it to say the Slim,
only 86% of the coffee by volume,
and therefore I think pretty much by weight,
was underneath 1,500 microns,
which meant that 14% of the coffee
was in pieces bigger than 1,500 microns.
1,500 microns is a very large piece of coffee.
That's a chunk of coffee.
That's 1.5 millimeters.
That's a lot, and so applied to the 15 gram dose here,
that's a significant weight of coffee
that was simply too large a piece
to properly contribute to the extraction.
And I think that's where this falls down.
And that this produces less of those pieces,
it still produces some, but then again, so does this,
but less, but it's less boulders that are really the secret
to I think a kind of better hand grinder.
That's what I think anyway.
I'm still surprised this tastes as good as it does
with that many fines in the cup profile,
but it tastes the way it tastes and, you know,
I think it's always important
to take particle size data with a grain of salt,
especially in the absence of taste data.
And with the presence of taste data,
well, my mind was changed.
So, interesting.
It's time to pull shots of espresso.
This claims it can do it, can it?
We should talk about grind adjustment.
It's one aspect of this grinder we haven't really discussed.
It works the way that almost all hand grinders
like this work.
There is underneath here a dial,
you would twist it clockwise for finer
and anti-clockwise for coarser.
They give some guidance on the website.
They would say there's 30 clicks in a rotation
and at around 30 clicks from zero is your espresso setting
and your pour over might be say 40 to 60 clicks,
somewhere there.
I haven't checked my clicks to be honest.
I wasn't paying attention, I was just trying to dial it in
to where it tasted good and match the other grinders.
So now, for the first time,
I'm gonna try and get it close to an espresso grind setting.
Now I...
I don't like hand grinders, I've gotta be honest with you.
I don't enjoy them.
I don't like grinding coffee by hand.
That's just me.
Other people do, that's okay.
It's not wrong to enjoy it.
You can enjoy what you like.
However, dialing in espresso
with a hand grinder is a miserable task.
And so, for that, the trusty Makita is gonna help me out.
It's not the perfect tool,
I know it's not the perfect tool for this,
but it's what I have to hand right now.
And, well, you might be familiar with my opinions
on Makita's coffee maker.
If you're not, well, check that link in the description.
I did, earlier on, count the number of rotations
I was doing in hand grinding.
And then I got out a tachometer
that we used for sort of checking grinder RPMs
and then I checked the RPM of my drill usage
to try and match it to hand grinding
and then I realized there's something wrong with me.
And why am I confessing this to you?
I should just grind the coffee.
(grinder whirring)
Yeah, I would say 18 grams,
probably a max dose sensibly in here.
You might squeeze 20 in.
(machine humming)
I choked it!
Too fine.
But can it be adjusted to the right flow?
That's not the...
You know, can it go fine enough is one question,
can I dial it in accurately to the flow rate that I want?
That's the other question.
Let's go four clicks coarser.
(drill whirring)
(machine humming)
So now we're close.
That was too fast, that was a 22 second shot
for the kind of ratio I'm looking for.
So one click finer.
If this can do espresso,
that would make a sensible change to the flow time.
We get it close to like a 28, 30 second shot
or we won't, we'll find out.
But this is the test.
(machine humming)
I don't know what I'm expecting here.
Smells okay.
I'm curious, you could probably play with this a little bit.
That's not the best espresso of my life.
It's quite acidic.
It's not wonderfully extracted.
It lacks a bit of sweetness, it lacks a bit of texture.
I don't feel like espresso is gonna be this grinder's forte.
It's also 33 pounds.
It's 33 pounds, so, you know,
just calm myself down for a second.
I could adjust it to get the flow rate that I wanted.
The steps were relatively small.
I could get that flow rate.
It didn't taste as good as I would want it to.
It may be a grinder that suffers terribly with channeling.
There may be other issues.
I don't really truly believe in diagnosing that much
from a naked portafilter
apart from obvious issues.
But we'll still show you a slow motion
naked portafilter from this grinder.
I'm gonna pull in the shots, why not?
How times have changed.
I think back to several years ago when I made a video
that was looking for the best grinder under £100
and this would've done really well in that category.
This would've trounced something like the Porlex
or the Hario or the kind of cheaper options there.
It's a better grinder.
It's a more enjoyable grinder to use.
It's a more capable grinder.
For me, I wanted to buy something
at the same kind of price point as the Hario,
the little Mini Mill, the Slim,
and wow, what a stark difference between the two.
How exciting that there is a grinder for £33
that I can comfortably recommend to people
who wanna dip a toe in coffee,
who wanna dip a toe in grinding their own coffee,
get access to wholebean coffee which is a better experience.
And you know, being able to buy what you want fresh,
grind it fresh, what a delight.
Grind it appropriately for your brew method,
excellence happens that way.
I can't speak to the robustness of this.
I don't know how it's gonna age and last.
I don't know if it's gonna break.
There's lots of metal in here,
there's lots of polycarbonate too.
And it's not as good as a great hand grinder.
It's not as good as a Comandante. It's not gonna be as good
as a bunch of decent hand grinders.
But for the money, I am impressed and I'm excited.
I want to see innovation happening
at these kind of price points
as much as I wanna see it up at the expensive end of things.
So, this is cool.
I'm excited.
Do you have one of these?
How's it been?
How's the cups of coffee been?
Share your experiences.
What did I miss?
What could be better about these?
How is the P2, if you have one?
Is it a big jump up?
I'd love to hear from any and all of you
down in the comments below.
But for now, I will say thank you so much for watching
and I hope you have a great day.
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)