Jack Smith STRIKES BACK at Supreme Court with BIG Announcement

MeidasTouch
4 Mar 202409:47

Summary

TLDRIn this informative video, Dave Aronberg, the State Attorney for Palm Beach County, Florida, discusses the potential implications of the Supreme Court's recent ruling on the federal election interference case against Donald Trump. Despite the Court's intervention delaying the proceedings, Aronberg explains how the Department of Justice's strategic moves, such as lifting the 60-day pre-election policy restriction and Judge Chutkin's determination, increase the likelihood of Trump facing trial before the upcoming election. Additionally, he highlights the Stormy Daniels hush money case in New York as a separate trial that will undoubtedly proceed, ensuring legal scrutiny of Trump's actions regardless of the Supreme Court's decision.

Takeaways

  • 😐 The Supreme Court has temporarily halted the Department of Justice's case against Donald Trump for election interference, causing delays.
  • 🏛️ Despite the Supreme Court's intervention, the Department of Justice believes there's still a chance the D.C. election interference case against Trump could proceed before the election.
  • ⏰ The DOJ has announced that their policy of not taking investigative steps within 60 days of an election does not apply to cases where the defendant (like Trump) has already been indicted.
  • ⚖️ Judge Chutkin, overseeing the D.C. case, has indicated a willingness to expedite the trial, potentially cutting down Trump's preparation time from the initially allotted 88 days.
  • ⌛ Even if the Supreme Court delays their ruling until late June, Judge Chutkin could still expedite the trial to take place in August, September, or October, which could politically wound Trump before the election.
  • 🗳️ Regardless of the D.C. case's timeline, Trump faces a separate trial in New York over the Stormy Daniels hush money payments, which could damage his standing with evangelical voters if he's convicted.
  • 🔐 The New York case is pardon-proof, meaning Trump cannot pardon himself if found guilty.
  • 👨⚖️ Legal experts like George Conway believe that even if the Supreme Court delays the D.C. case until close to the election, it could still politically harm Trump.
  • 🕰️ The DOJ's lead prosecutor, Jack Smith, could potentially speed up the D.C. case or reduce the number of charges to ensure it proceeds before the election.
  • 💪 Despite setbacks, the video expresses optimism that Trump will face some accountability through these legal proceedings before or around the election.

Q & A

  • What recent Supreme Court ruling is being discussed in the script?

    -The script is referring to a recent Supreme Court ruling related to the election interference case against Donald Trump in Washington, DC. The ruling is seen as unfavorable as it has thrown a potential roadblock in Trump being tried in this case before the election.

  • What did the Department of Justice announce regarding Trump's criminal cases?

    -The Department of Justice announced that its internal policy of not indicting or taking investigative steps within 60 days of an election does not apply to Trump's criminal cases, including those where he has already been indicted.

  • How could Judge Chutkin's actions potentially impact the timing of the DC election interference case?

    -Judge Chutkin has indicated a willingness to expedite the case, including cancelling her European vacation, if necessary. She could also limit the 88-day preparation time granted to Trump, potentially allowing the case to proceed closer to the election.

  • What options does Special Counsel Jack Smith have to potentially speed up the DC case?

    -Jack Smith could either speed up the pace of his case presentation or potentially reduce the number of charges against Trump from the current four counts, in order to ensure the case proceeds before the election.

  • What is the concern raised about a potential Supreme Court ruling remanding the case back to Judge Chutkin?

    -There is a concern that if the Supreme Court remands the case back to Judge Chutkin with instructions to determine if presidential immunity applies, it could delay the case until after the election or very close to it.

  • Why is the Stormy Daniels hush money case in New York considered significant?

    -The Stormy Daniels hush money case in New York is seen as significant because it is likely to be the only case that will be tried before the election. It also involves allegations that could be particularly damaging to Trump's evangelical voter base.

  • What is the significance of the Stormy Daniels case being 'pardon proof'?

    -The fact that the Stormy Daniels case is a state case means that Trump cannot pardon himself if convicted, as presidential pardons only apply to federal crimes.

  • According to the script, what potential impact could a conviction have on Trump's electoral prospects?

    -The script suggests that a conviction in any of the cases against Trump could potentially discourage a segment of voters from supporting him, based on polling data mentioned.

  • What is the overall message conveyed in the script regarding the prospects of Trump facing prosecution before the election?

    -The overall message is one of cautious optimism, suggesting that despite the Supreme Court's intervention, there is still a real possibility that Trump could face prosecution, particularly in the DC case or the Stormy Daniels case, before the election.

  • Who is the speaker in the video script, and what is their background?

    -The speaker is Dave Aronberg, who is identified as the State Attorney for Palm Beach County, Florida, and referred to as the 'Florida law man'.

Outlines

00:00

⚖️ DOJ Increases Chances of Trump's Trial Before Elections

Despite the Supreme Court's recent ruling, the Department of Justice has taken steps to increase the likelihood that Donald Trump will be tried in the election interference case in Washington, DC before the upcoming elections. The DOJ announced that its policy of not indicting or taking investigative steps within 60 days of an election does not apply to Trump's criminal cases. Additionally, Judge Chutkin has expressed her willingness to cancel her European vacation to ensure the case proceeds. Even if the Supreme Court delays its ruling until the end of June, Judge Chutkin could reduce Trump's 88-day preparation time, and prosecutor Jack Smith could speed up the case or reduce the charges to expedite the trial before the election.

05:02

🗳️ Impact of Trials on Trump's Election Prospects

Even if the Supreme Court's ruling pushes the Washington, DC case past the election, there is still a chance that Trump will be held accountable. The Stormy Daniels hush money payments trial in New York is set to take place before the election, and it could damage Trump's standing with his Evangelical base. Additionally, if Trump is found guilty in any of the cases against him, a portion of the population has indicated they will not vote for him. Although the New York case may not be the strongest, it will dominate headlines and is pardon-proof. Furthermore, if the Washington, DC case proceeds close to the election, it could wound Trump politically, according to conservative commentator George Conway. The summary highlights the potential impact of these trials on Trump's election prospects, regardless of the Supreme Court's ruling.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Supreme Court ruling

This refers to a recent decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding a case involving Donald Trump. The ruling is described as throwing "sand in the gears of Justice" and causing delays in the legal proceedings against Trump. The speaker expresses disappointment with the Supreme Court's intervention, which he sees as hindering the pursuit of justice.

💡Election interference case

This refers to a specific legal case against Donald Trump related to his alleged interference in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The case is being handled in Washington, D.C., and the speaker suggests that it has a higher likelihood of being heard before the upcoming election compared to other cases against Trump. The video script discusses the potential implications and strategies surrounding this case.

💡Department of Justice (DOJ)

The Department of Justice is a federal executive department of the United States government responsible for enforcing federal laws and administering justice. The video discusses recent actions taken by the DOJ concerning the cases against Donald Trump, such as their announcement that their policy of not indicting or taking investigative steps within 60 days of an election does not apply to Trump's criminal cases.

💡Judge Chutkin

Judge Chutkin is the district court judge overseeing the election interference case against Donald Trump in Washington, D.C. The video describes Judge Chutkin's eagerness to move the case forward, even stating her willingness to cancel a European vacation to prioritize the trial. The judge's decisions and actions are discussed as potential factors influencing the timeline of the case.

💡Jack Smith

Jack Smith is the lead prosecutor in the election interference case against Donald Trump. The video mentions Smith's role in indicting Trump on four counts and his desire to expedite the case, potentially by speeding up the prosecution or cutting down the number of charges. Smith's actions are portrayed as pivotal in determining the pace and scope of the trial.

💡Presidential immunity

Presidential immunity refers to the legal concept of whether a sitting U.S. president can be prosecuted or held accountable for alleged crimes while in office. The video discusses the Supreme Court's potential ruling on the issue of "absolute presidential immunity," which the speaker argues would essentially make the president a "king" and contradicts the foundational principles of the United States.

💡Mar-a-Lago documents case

This refers to a separate legal case against Donald Trump related to his alleged mishandling of classified documents from the White House, which were found at his Mar-a-Lago residence. The video mentions this case in the context of the DOJ's announcement that their election policy does not apply to Trump's criminal cases, suggesting implications for both the election interference case and the Mar-a-Lago documents case.

💡Stormy Daniels hush money case

This case involves allegations that Donald Trump made hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to conceal their alleged affair during the 2016 presidential campaign. The video discusses how this case, being handled by the Manhattan District Attorney's office, is likely to proceed to trial before the upcoming election, potentially impacting Trump's image and support among evangelical voters.

💡Pardon-proof

The term "pardon-proof" refers to the idea that certain cases or charges against Donald Trump cannot be pardoned by the president, even if Trump were to pardon himself. The video specifically mentions that the Stormy Daniels hush money case in New York is "pardon-proof," meaning that Trump cannot use a presidential pardon to avoid prosecution or conviction in that case.

💡Evangelical base

The term "evangelical base" refers to the core group of Christian evangelical voters who have traditionally supported Donald Trump and the Republican Party. The video suggests that the Stormy Daniels hush money case, which involves Trump's alleged affair with a porn star, could potentially alienate or erode support from this crucial voting bloc if Trump is found guilty.

Highlights

The Department of Justice has done something to increase the chances that Donald Trump will be tried in the election interference case in Washington, DC.

The Supreme Court's recent decision upset many because it delayed the DC Circuit Court's decision, which was comprehensive and convincing on the issue of absolute presidential immunity.

Donald Trump clearly fears the DC case the most because it's the most likely of the two federal cases to be heard before the election.

The Department of Justice announced that its internal policy of not indicting or taking investigative steps within 60 days of an election does not apply to Trump's criminal cases.

If the DC case could get scheduled before the election, it can proceed even if the defendant is on the ballot himself.

Judge Chutkin wants the DC case to happen and is willing to cancel her European vacation to make it happen.

Jack Smith only indicted Trump on four counts and did not name any co-conspirators, targeting Trump in this case.

Even if the Supreme Court delays its ruling until late June, Judge Chutkin could limit Trump's 88-day preparation time.

Jack Smith could speed up his case or cut down on the charges to expedite the trial before the election.

If the Supreme Court remands the case to Judge Chutkin to determine if presidential immunity applies, it could push the trial closer to or past the election.

Conservative commentator George Conway believes a trial close to the election would still hurt Trump politically.

At least one trial, the Stormy Daniels hush money case in New York, will happen before the election and cannot be pardoned by Trump.

The Stormy Daniels case will dominate headlines and could impact Trump's evangelical base if he's found guilty.

A portion of voters say they will not vote for Trump if he's guilty of any of the charges against him.

Despite the Supreme Court's intervention, there is a real possibility that the DC election interference case will happen close to the election.

Transcripts

00:00

despite the Supreme Court's recent

00:01

ruling the Department of Justice has now

00:04

done something to increase the chances

00:06

that Donald Trump will be tried in the

00:09

election interference case in Washington

00:11

DC let's discuss I'm Dave aronberg state

00:14

attorney for Palm Beach County aka the

00:16

Florida law man here in the midest touch

00:18

Network I want to thank everyone for

00:20

your views your likes your comments

00:23

please keep them coming and as far as

00:26

the Supreme Court's recent decision I

00:28

know it upset a lot of us because they

00:31

threw sand in the gears of Justice the

00:34

DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision was

00:36

powerful it was comprehensive and it was

00:39

convincing and it was dealing with an

00:41

easy issue the issue of absolute

00:43

presidential immunity that's a legal

00:45

layup I mean there's a reason why we

00:47

left the crown 250 years ago it's

00:50

because we didn't want a king and this

00:53

absolute immunity garbage would make the

00:57

president a king I mean come on this is

00:59

not a hard decision the Supreme Court

01:01

stepped in to say hold on we want oine

01:03

on this even though they had a chance to

01:05

do so back in December they said no let

01:07

this go through the DC Circuit Court of

01:09

Appeals first and then they came back

01:11

and say yeah now let's stay the whole

01:13

matter while we deliberate on this and

01:16

they said an April 22nd oral argument

01:18

dat but look don't lose

01:21

hope you know Donald Trump clearly fears

01:24

the DC case the most because that's the

01:27

case that's most likely of the two

01:29

Federal cases to be heard before the

01:30

election the strongest case to me is the

01:33

marago documents case but with judge

01:35

Canon that's being slow walked that's

01:37

not going to be heard before the

01:38

election but I still think there's a

01:41

chance that this case in DC can be heard

01:44

and something the Department of Justice

01:46

just did makes it more likely than just

01:50

a small chance and clearly they're on

01:52

this they realize uh that this could be

01:56

their best chance to actually hold

01:58

Donald Trump accountable the Department

02:00

of Justice made an important

02:02

announcement and ironically it was not

02:03

in the DC case but it affects it it was

02:05

actually in the marlago documents case

02:09

where the Department of Justice told

02:12

judge Canon that its internal policy of

02:16

not indicting or taking over

02:18

investigative steps within 60 days of an

02:21

election well that does not apply to

02:24

Trump's criminal cases that's what the

02:26

doj has said and at this Hearing in

02:30

front of Judge Canon just recently Jack

02:31

Smith's team told the judge that there

02:35

are no Department of Justice policies

02:38

that prevent cases that have already

02:40

been charged from going to trial that

02:43

close to an election so it applies even

02:46

if the defendant is on the ballot

02:48

himself so the 60-day rule applies to

02:51

you know the grand jury proceedings it

02:52

applies to investigative steps it

02:54

doesn't apply to Someone Like Donald

02:55

Trump who was already indicted a while

02:57

ago so that is the big news that if this

03:02

case could get teed up before judge

03:04

chuckin at any time before the election

03:07

then it can go and judge shutkin clearly

03:09

wants it to go judge shutkin has said

03:11

that she'll cancel her European Vacation

03:15

which is scheduled for uh the late

03:17

summer early fall to make this case

03:20

happen she wants it to happen this case

03:23

was built for Speed Jack Smith wants it

03:25

to happen he only only uh indicted on

03:28

four counts he didn't name any other

03:30

co-conspirators the others are

03:31

unindicted and so he is targeting Donald

03:34

Trump in this case and so there are a

03:36

few things that could happen that even

03:38

if the Supreme Court delays and waits

03:41

until the end of June to come forward

03:44

with its ruling which seems like it

03:46

probably will happen because that's the

03:49

end of this term for the Supreme Court

03:52

so even if the decision comes out at the

03:55

end of June here's what could happen

03:57

judge hutkin has said that Donald Trump

04:00

has 88 more days to prepare for the case

04:03

that's where the case was frozen when

04:05

Trump took the appeal and there was a

04:07

stay issued initially by judge

04:09

chuckin but that 88 days is not set in

04:12

stone judge chuckin based on what the

04:15

Supreme Court did based on these delays

04:17

that were not accounted for when judge

04:19

hutkin announced the prep time the 88

04:22

days of prep time she could limit that

04:25

she can cut that and I think she would

04:27

based on everything that's happened I

04:29

think that if this case is decided as

04:32

late as late June that judge hutkin will

04:35

then cut down the 88 days prep time to

04:38

what we don't know but I think it's a

04:40

likelihood that she would say that

04:42

Donald Trump you've had so much time

04:44

already to prepare you don't need

04:45

another 88 days on top of that so let's

04:48

get moving plus Jack Smith could also

04:52

speed up his own case Jack Smith has

04:54

said his case could take a couple months

04:56

but I think that knowing that there's an

04:58

election around the the corner he either

05:01

speeds up his case or he may even cut

05:04

down on the charges right now there are

05:06

four counts he could cut it down too if

05:09

he wanted to I don't think he needs to I

05:11

think he could speed up his case without

05:13

having to cut the number of counts but

05:16

these are options that are available to

05:19

a judge who wants this thing to go and a

05:21

lead prosecutor who wants this thing to

05:23

go now one concern I have is that the

05:26

Supreme Court would not only wait until

05:28

the end of June to announce its ruling

05:31

but then they also could remand the case

05:34

to the district court judge shutkin and

05:36

say here's our new rule on presidential

05:38

immunity instead of just saying there is

05:41

no presidential immunity in this case

05:42

we're going to say it could be available

05:44

in certain cases and it's up to you

05:46

judge chuin to make the factual finding

05:49

whether it applies here so worst case

05:51

scenario that could push this case even

05:53

closer to the election or even past the

05:55

election but even if it does push it

05:58

closer to the the election by delaying

06:00

it even even further a conservative

06:03

commentator George Conway and never

06:04

Trumper has said that that would still

06:07

hurt Trump because then the trial would

06:10

be taking place so close to the election

06:13

that it would wound Trump politically

06:15

more than if it took place a lot sooner

06:18

here's what Conway said yeah politically

06:21

I don't think it's helpful for Donald

06:22

Trump I mean sometimes in litigation you

06:25

you you lose by getting what you asked

06:28

for and what he has asked for in the in

06:31

in the in the m in the January 6th case

06:34

is delay delay delay but he may not get

06:36

enough delay I mean the Supreme Court

06:38

took this case and probably probably for

06:41

good not not to delay the case but I

06:43

think they probably think they have

06:44

something to add to the law in this area

06:47

and there are multiple motions that

06:50

Donald Trump has been making both in you

06:52

know both in Georgia and in Florida

06:55

maybe you know it could the guidance

06:57

could be helpful from the Supreme Court

06:58

but the end result would be we're going

07:01

to get a decision that the the case is

07:03

still expedited the appeal to the

07:05

Supreme Court is still expedited we're

07:06

going to get a decision by the end of

07:07

June maybe even earlier and if that's

07:10

true when you do the math you get a

07:12

trial in August September or October and

07:15

that is not a good thing for Donald

07:17

Trump he would be better to get the

07:19

thing over with

07:21

frankly even with a conviction so that

07:23

is another possibility we don't know

07:25

exactly what's going to happen but my

07:27

point is is my is mighty don't lose hope

07:31

even if the Supreme Court pushes this

07:33

past the election there is still reason

07:36

to believe that Trump will be held

07:38

accountable at least in part and that is

07:40

because there is definitely one trial

07:43

that will be taking place before the

07:45

election that's the case in New York the

07:46

Stormy Daniels hush money payments trial

07:49

that's the case where Alvin Bragg the da

07:52

is arguing that because Donald Trump

07:54

falsified business records he was able

07:56

to hide payments to a porn star that

08:00

would have damaged his election chances

08:03

thus it's a campaign Finance violation

08:05

thus it's election interference and thus

08:07

these are felonies and he should be sent

08:09

to prison this is what Alvin brag will

08:10

be arguing and whether you think it's

08:13

the strongest case or not I think it's

08:15

probably the fourth out of four of the

08:17

criminal cases against trump it is not

08:20

necessarily a weak case is a case that

08:22

will dominate the headlines and in front

08:25

of Trump's Evangelical base we going to

08:26

have to have to deal with the fact that

08:28

you know he made these payments to an

08:31

adult film star and then if he's found

08:34

guilty there is a number of the voters

08:37

of the population who say they will not

08:38

vote for Donald Trump if he's guilty of

08:42

any of these charges against him so

08:44

whether that holds true we shall see but

08:47

for those who believe that Donald Trump

08:49

will be immune from any convictions any

08:52

prosecutions before the election no

08:55

there's at least one case that is going

08:57

to be heard the one in New York and that

08:59

case case is pardon proof Trump cannot

09:00

pardon himself out of it but also there

09:03

is a real possibility that despite the

09:05

Supreme Court's intervention that the DC

09:08

election interference case will happen

09:10

and if it does happen it's going to

09:11

happen close to the election because the

09:14

Department of Justice says that even if

09:16

it's close to the election it's still

09:18

game on so stay tuned thank you so much

09:22

for watching I hope you enjoyed this

09:24

video if you liked it please like it and

09:27

subscribe I'm Dave aronberg aka the

09:29

Florida law man see you next time hey

09:32

midest Mighty love this report continue

09:34

the conversation by following us on

09:35

Instagram @ mest touch to keep up with

09:38

the most important news of the day what

09:39

are you waiting for follow us

09:46

now

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
Legal AnalysisTrump InvestigationElection InterferenceSupreme CourtDepartment of JusticePresidential Immunity2024 ElectionPolitical CommentaryHigh-Stakes TrialAccountability
Вам нужно реферат на русском языке?