Jack Smith STRIKES BACK at Supreme Court with BIG Announcement

despite the Supreme Court's recent

ruling the Department of Justice has now

done something to increase the chances

that Donald Trump will be tried in the

election interference case in Washington

DC let's discuss I'm Dave aronberg state

attorney for Palm Beach County aka the

Florida law man here in the midest touch

Network I want to thank everyone for

your views your likes your comments

please keep them coming and as far as

the Supreme Court's recent decision I

know it upset a lot of us because they

threw sand in the gears of Justice the

DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision was

powerful it was comprehensive and it was

convincing and it was dealing with an

easy issue the issue of absolute

presidential immunity that's a legal

layup I mean there's a reason why we

left the crown 250 years ago it's

because we didn't want a king and this

absolute immunity garbage would make the

president a king I mean come on this is

not a hard decision the Supreme Court

stepped in to say hold on we want oine

on this even though they had a chance to

do so back in December they said no let

this go through the DC Circuit Court of

Appeals first and then they came back

and say yeah now let's stay the whole

matter while we deliberate on this and

they said an April 22nd oral argument

dat but look don't lose

hope you know Donald Trump clearly fears

the DC case the most because that's the

case that's most likely of the two

Federal cases to be heard before the

election the strongest case to me is the

marago documents case but with judge

Canon that's being slow walked that's

not going to be heard before the

election but I still think there's a

chance that this case in DC can be heard

and something the Department of Justice

just did makes it more likely than just

a small chance and clearly they're on

this they realize uh that this could be

their best chance to actually hold

Donald Trump accountable the Department

of Justice made an important

announcement and ironically it was not

in the DC case but it affects it it was

actually in the marlago documents case

where the Department of Justice told

judge Canon that its internal policy of

not indicting or taking over

investigative steps within 60 days of an

election well that does not apply to

Trump's criminal cases that's what the

doj has said and at this Hearing in

front of Judge Canon just recently Jack

Smith's team told the judge that there

are no Department of Justice policies

that prevent cases that have already

been charged from going to trial that

close to an election so it applies even

if the defendant is on the ballot

himself so the 60-day rule applies to

you know the grand jury proceedings it

applies to investigative steps it

doesn't apply to Someone Like Donald

Trump who was already indicted a while

ago so that is the big news that if this

case could get teed up before judge

chuckin at any time before the election

then it can go and judge shutkin clearly

wants it to go judge shutkin has said

that she'll cancel her European Vacation

which is scheduled for uh the late

summer early fall to make this case

happen she wants it to happen this case

was built for Speed Jack Smith wants it

to happen he only only uh indicted on

four counts he didn't name any other

co-conspirators the others are

unindicted and so he is targeting Donald

Trump in this case and so there are a

few things that could happen that even

if the Supreme Court delays and waits

until the end of June to come forward

with its ruling which seems like it

probably will happen because that's the

end of this term for the Supreme Court

so even if the decision comes out at the

end of June here's what could happen

judge hutkin has said that Donald Trump

has 88 more days to prepare for the case

that's where the case was frozen when

Trump took the appeal and there was a

stay issued initially by judge

chuckin but that 88 days is not set in

stone judge chuckin based on what the

Supreme Court did based on these delays

that were not accounted for when judge

hutkin announced the prep time the 88

days of prep time she could limit that

she can cut that and I think she would

based on everything that's happened I

think that if this case is decided as

late as late June that judge hutkin will

then cut down the 88 days prep time to

what we don't know but I think it's a

likelihood that she would say that

Donald Trump you've had so much time

already to prepare you don't need

another 88 days on top of that so let's

get moving plus Jack Smith could also

speed up his own case Jack Smith has

said his case could take a couple months

but I think that knowing that there's an

election around the the corner he either

speeds up his case or he may even cut

down on the charges right now there are

four counts he could cut it down too if

he wanted to I don't think he needs to I

think he could speed up his case without

having to cut the number of counts but

these are options that are available to

a judge who wants this thing to go and a

lead prosecutor who wants this thing to

go now one concern I have is that the

Supreme Court would not only wait until

the end of June to announce its ruling

but then they also could remand the case

to the district court judge shutkin and

say here's our new rule on presidential

immunity instead of just saying there is

no presidential immunity in this case

we're going to say it could be available

in certain cases and it's up to you

judge chuin to make the factual finding

whether it applies here so worst case

scenario that could push this case even

closer to the election or even past the

election but even if it does push it

closer to the the election by delaying

it even even further a conservative

commentator George Conway and never

Trumper has said that that would still

hurt Trump because then the trial would

be taking place so close to the election

that it would wound Trump politically

more than if it took place a lot sooner

here's what Conway said yeah politically

I don't think it's helpful for Donald

Trump I mean sometimes in litigation you

you you lose by getting what you asked

for and what he has asked for in the in

in the in the m in the January 6th case

is delay delay delay but he may not get

enough delay I mean the Supreme Court

took this case and probably probably for

good not not to delay the case but I

think they probably think they have

something to add to the law in this area

and there are multiple motions that

Donald Trump has been making both in you

know both in Georgia and in Florida

maybe you know it could the guidance

could be helpful from the Supreme Court

but the end result would be we're going

to get a decision that the the case is

still expedited the appeal to the

Supreme Court is still expedited we're

going to get a decision by the end of

June maybe even earlier and if that's

true when you do the math you get a

trial in August September or October and

that is not a good thing for Donald

Trump he would be better to get the

thing over with

frankly even with a conviction so that

is another possibility we don't know

exactly what's going to happen but my

point is is my is mighty don't lose hope

even if the Supreme Court pushes this

past the election there is still reason

to believe that Trump will be held

accountable at least in part and that is

because there is definitely one trial

that will be taking place before the

election that's the case in New York the

Stormy Daniels hush money payments trial

that's the case where Alvin Bragg the da

is arguing that because Donald Trump

falsified business records he was able

to hide payments to a porn star that

would have damaged his election chances

thus it's a campaign Finance violation

thus it's election interference and thus

these are felonies and he should be sent

to prison this is what Alvin brag will

be arguing and whether you think it's

the strongest case or not I think it's

probably the fourth out of four of the

criminal cases against trump it is not

necessarily a weak case is a case that

will dominate the headlines and in front

of Trump's Evangelical base we going to

have to have to deal with the fact that

you know he made these payments to an

adult film star and then if he's found

guilty there is a number of the voters

of the population who say they will not

vote for Donald Trump if he's guilty of

any of these charges against him so

whether that holds true we shall see but

for those who believe that Donald Trump

will be immune from any convictions any

prosecutions before the election no

there's at least one case that is going

to be heard the one in New York and that

case case is pardon proof Trump cannot

pardon himself out of it but also there

is a real possibility that despite the

Supreme Court's intervention that the DC

election interference case will happen

and if it does happen it's going to

happen close to the election because the

Department of Justice says that even if

it's close to the election it's still

game on so stay tuned thank you so much

for watching I hope you enjoyed this

video if you liked it please like it and

subscribe I'm Dave aronberg aka the

Florida law man see you next time hey

midest Mighty love this report continue

the conversation by following us on

Instagram @ mest touch to keep up with

the most important news of the day what

are you waiting for follow us

now