SBF Sentenced, Diddy Grooming Allegations & Trump Civil Suit w/ Alina Habba | PBD Podcast | Ep. 386

PBD Podcast
28 Mar 2024110:29

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses various legal and social issues, including the case of President Trump's legal battles, the overvaluation of John Stewart's property, and the hiring of R. McDaniel at NBC. It also touches on the allegations against Diddy, the Nickelodeon CEO announcement, and the Baltimore Bridge incident. The conversation highlights the complexities of the legal system, the influence of media, and the importance of accountability and justice.

Takeaways

  • 🎙️ The discussion revolves around various legal issues and high-profile personalities, including President Trump, Puff Daddy, and R. McDaniel.
  • 💰 R. McDaniel was reportedly paid $30,000 per minute for her short-lived contract with NBC, sparking controversy and internal backlash.
  • 👩‍💼 The hiring of R. McDaniel at NBC was met with strong disapproval from employees, leading to her contract being terminated.
  • 🚨 There are concerns about potential upcoming legal challenges for President Trump, especially as he prepares for a possible 2024 run.
  • 📺 The conversation touches on the role of the media in shaping public perception of legal cases and political figures.
  • 🤝 The importance of due process and the potential for political motivations to influence legal outcomes is highlighted.
  • 📈 The discussion includes references to specific legal cases, such as the Carol lawsuit and the Trump Organization's financial dealings.
  • 🏛️ The role of judges in the legal system and the potential for bias or political influence is critiqued.
  • 💸 The financial aspects of legal cases, including the posting of bonds and the impact on assets, are discussed in the context of President Trump's legal battles.
  • 🤯 The conversation emphasizes the complexity and unpredictability of the legal system, especially for high-profile individuals.
  • 🌐 The global implications of legal decisions and the potential for international scrutiny are also considered.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of discussion in the transcript?

    -The main topic of discussion in the transcript revolves around legal issues, specifically focusing on high-profile cases involving celebrities and public figures, including potential legal battles involving Donald Trump, Puff Daddy, and others.

  • Who is Alina Habba and what is her role in the discussion?

    -Alina Habba is a famous lawyer in America who is known for her appearances on TV. In the discussion, she provides insights and updates on various legal cases and issues, particularly those involving President Trump.

  • What is the significance of the SPF case mentioned in the transcript?

    -The SPF case is significant because it involves a legal battle with President Trump and is being handled by the same judge who was on the Ean Carroll case. The discussion suggests that the outcome of this case could have implications for Trump's legal standing.

  • What are some of the other legal issues discussed in the transcript?

    -Other legal issues discussed in the transcript include Puff Daddy's legal troubles, the overvaluation of John Stewart's property, and the contract of a high-paid individual on NBC.

  • What is the claim made by the speaker about the motivation behind the legal cases against President Trump?

    -The speaker claims that the motivation behind the legal cases against President Trump is politically driven, with the aim of damaging his reputation and potentially affecting his chances in the 2024 elections.

  • How does the discussion suggest the legal system is being used as a tool for political purposes?

    -The discussion suggests that the legal system is being used as a tool for political purposes by highlighting cases where high-profile individuals, particularly those with political connections or influence, are involved. It implies that the legal proceedings are not always based on impartial justice but can be influenced by political agendas.

  • What is the speaker's view on the role of the media in legal cases?

    -The speaker believes that the media plays a significant role in shaping the narrative around legal cases. They suggest that the media often focuses on stories that align with their own biases, potentially influencing public opinion and the outcome of legal proceedings.

  • What is the significance of the mention of the FBI warning about potential terror attacks?

    -The mention of the FBI warning about potential terror attacks serves to highlight the broader context of security concerns in the country. It suggests that there are ongoing efforts to prevent and mitigate threats, but also underscores the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies.

  • How does the discussion relate to the current political climate in the United States?

    -The discussion reflects the current political climate in the United States by touching on issues such as the legal battles involving the former president, the role of the media in shaping political narratives, and the broader context of security concerns. It suggests a complex interplay between legal proceedings, media coverage, and political motivations.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the concept of personal responsibility in the context of legal cases?

    -The speaker seems to support the concept of personal responsibility, particularly when discussing the legal issues of high-profile individuals. They imply that those involved in legal cases should face the consequences of their actions, regardless of their social or political status.

Outlines

00:00

🎶 Introduction and Overview of Legal Issues

The video begins with a discussion on the value of entrepreneurs and the legal challenges they face. The host introduces a famous lawyer, Alina Habba, who frequently appears on TV and is known for her tenacity in legal battles. The conversation quickly shifts to various ongoing legal issues, including those involving President Trump, Puff Daddy, and other high-profile individuals. The host also mentions a warning from the FBI about potential terror attacks and shares an update on the search for a new CEO at Nickelodeon.

05:03

📚 Legal Battles and the Appeal Process

Alina Habba provides insights into the legal battles involving President Trump, emphasizing the corruption within the system and the selective prosecution. She discusses the SPF case and the controversial decisions made by the judge, highlighting the importance of the appeal process. Habba also addresses the public's reaction to the legal proceedings and the potential impact on Trump's assets and reputation leading up to the 2024 elections.

10:05

🏛️ Critique of the Justice System and Political Motivations

The conversation delves into a critique of the justice system, with Habba questioning the motivations behind the cases against Trump. She alleges that the cases are politically motivated and that the judicial activism is at its worst. Habba also discusses the gag orders on lawyers and the lack of accountability within the legal world, emphasizing the need for change and the potential consequences of the ongoing legal tactics.

15:06

🎭 The Role of the Judge in the Courtroom

Habba continues to discuss the power and influence of judges in the courtroom, particularly in civil cases. She argues that the judge's decisions can significantly impact the outcome of a case, and that the lack of a jury in certain cases can lead to injustice. Habba provides examples of how judges can manipulate the legal process and expresses concern over the potential misuse of power in high-profile cases.

20:07

🤝 The Impact of Legal Proceedings on Public Perception

The host and Habba discuss the impact of legal proceedings on public perception, particularly in cases involving celebrities and public figures. They explore how the media can shape narratives and influence public opinion. Habba shares her experiences of being portrayed negatively in the media and the challenges of countering these narratives. The conversation also touches on the importance of maintaining ethical standards in legal practice.

25:08

📈 Financial Implications of Legal Battles

The discussion shifts to the financial implications of ongoing legal battles, with Habba providing an in-depth analysis of the costs associated with civil cases. She explains the process of calculating damages and the potential financial impact on individuals and companies. The conversation also covers the importance of having a strong legal team and the financial burden of defending against multiple legal cases.

30:10

🎥 Public Figures and Legal Accountability

The conversation focuses on the legal accountability of public figures, with specific references to John Stewart and his involvement in overvaluing property. Habba and the host discuss the double standards in the legal system and the importance of holding everyone, regardless of their status, accountable for their actions. The discussion also touches on the role of the media in shaping public perception of legal issues.

35:11

🏠 Squatter Rights and Property Law

The host and Habba discuss the issue of squatter rights and property law, with a focus on the different laws across various states. They highlight the recent legislation in Florida that eliminates squatter rights and empowers property owners. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of such laws and the need for reform in other states to protect property rights.

40:11

💼 Legal Careers and Political Affiliations

The discussion turns to the challenges faced by legal professionals, particularly those with political affiliations that may not align with their employers. Habba shares her experiences and insights into navigating the legal field and the importance of maintaining integrity in the face of political pressure. The conversation also explores the potential career paths for individuals in the legal profession.

45:12

📺 Media Bias and the Role of News Networks

Habba and the host critique the media's role in shaping public opinion and the perceived bias in news coverage. They discuss the recent controversy surrounding R. McDaniel's short-lived tenure at NBC and the internal and external reactions to her hiring and subsequent dismissal. The conversation highlights the influence of media bias on public discourse and the challenges faced by journalists in maintaining objectivity.

50:14

🎥 Celebrity Influence and Legal Allegations

The conversation focuses on the influence of celebrities and the legal allegations they face. The host and Habba discuss the recent allegations against Diddy and the impact of such allegations on the individuals involved. They also explore the role of the media in reporting on these allegations and the potential consequences for the accused and their careers.

55:14

🚨 FBI Warnings and National Security

The host discusses the recent FBI warnings about potential terror attacks and the increased risk of violence in the US. They talk about the potential targets and the need for vigilance, especially in places of worship. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of these threats and the government's response to ensuring public safety.

00:16

💼 Legal Proceedings and Sentencing

The conversation concludes with a discussion on the legal proceedings and sentencing of high-profile individuals, specifically referencing the case of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF). Habba shares her insights into the potential outcomes of the case and the influence of political donations on legal decisions. The host and Habba also discuss the role of the judge in the sentencing process and the potential impact on public perception.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Legal battles

The term 'legal battles' refers to the various lawsuits and court cases that an individual or entity is involved in. In the context of the video, it relates to the numerous legal challenges faced by President Trump, including the SPF case and other disputes. The video discusses the complexities and implications of these legal proceedings, highlighting the political and media attention they receive.

💡Corrupt system

The phrase 'corrupt system' is used to describe an institution or structure that is dishonest, fraudulent, or compromised in some way. In the video, this term is employed to express the speaker's belief that the legal system is biased and unfair, particularly towards President Trump. The speaker suggests that the system is being manipulated to target and undermine certain individuals for political reasons.

💡Selective prosecution

Selective prosecution refers to the practice of a prosecutor choosing to bring charges against certain individuals for political or other improper reasons, rather than pursuing all equally guilty parties. In the video, the speaker accuses the prosecutor, Tish James, of selectively prosecuting President Trump to gain political advantage and further her own career, rather than acting in the interest of justice.

💡Asset seizure

Asset seizure is the process by which legal authorities take control of a person's property or assets, often as a result of legal judgments or allegations of wrongdoing. In the video, there is a discussion about the potential seizure of President Trump's assets as part of the legal proceedings against him, which the speaker views as an unjust and politically motivated action.

💡Judicial activism

Judicial activism is a term used to describe a philosophy of judicial interpretation where judges take an active role in shaping the law, often by interpreting constitutional or statutory provisions broadly. In some cases, this can lead to decisions that are seen as promoting certain political or social agendas. The speaker in the video criticizes judicial activism, suggesting that it has led to biased and unfair rulings in the legal cases involving President Trump.

💡Appeals process

The appeals process is a legal procedure by which a party who is dissatisfied with the outcome of a case can seek a review of the decision by a higher court. This process is based on the principle of ensuring that legal judgments are fair and just. In the video, the speaker expresses hope in the appeals process as a means to correct perceived injustices in the legal cases involving President Trump, and mentions that the appeals division has shown some sensibility in their decisions.

💡Political campaign

A political campaign is an organized effort to promote a political candidate or policy. In the context of the video, the speaker suggests that the legal cases against President Trump have been turned into a political campaign by his opponents, with the aim of damaging his reputation and reducing his influence. The speaker criticizes this approach, viewing it as an inappropriate blending of legal and political strategies.

💡Accountability

Accountability refers to the responsibility of an individual or organization to account for their actions and decisions, often to the public or to higher authorities. In the video, the concept of accountability is discussed in the context of elected officials and the legal system, with the speaker questioning the lack of accountability in the handling of certain cases, particularly those involving President Trump.

💡Civil suits

Civil suits are legal disputes between individuals or organizations that are not related to criminal activity. They typically involve issues such as contracts, property, or personal injury. In the video, the speaker discusses the civil suits against President Trump, emphasizing that these suits are separate from criminal cases and that they have been resolved, with no assets being seized.

💡Gag orders

A gag order is a legal order issued by a court or other legal authority prohibiting the parties involved in a case from discussing the details of the case with the public or the media. In the video, the speaker expresses concern about the use of gag orders in legal proceedings, suggesting that they are a form of suppression of information and a violation of free speech rights.

Highlights

Discussion on the legal case of President Trump and the handling of the SPF case by the same judge from the Ean Carroll case.

Mention of Puff Daddy's legal issues and the controversy surrounding his interactions with other celebrities like Usher and Justin Bieber.

Discussion on the high payment received by a news reporter at NBC, highlighting the financial aspects of media contracts.

Talk about Pennsylvania voter ballot issues and the push for accountability in voting practices.

John Stewart's revelation of Trump's property overvaluation and its connection to the current legal debates.

FBI warnings about potential terror attacks planned by Hamas, emphasizing the need for vigilance, especially during the Easter weekend.

Speculation on the new CEO of Nickelodeon and the implications of such an appointment.

Alex Jones' interaction with a rabbi, highlighting the importance of understanding different perspectives.

Update on President Trump's legal battles and the strategy used against him by the opposing side.

Discussion on the potential financial impact on President Trump's assets due to ongoing legal cases.

Analysis of the legal system's handling of civil suits against President Trump, focusing on the role of the judge in the Carol lawsuit.

Critique of the judicial system, specifically how judges can influence cases without a jury and the potential for bias.

Discussion on the role of the media in shaping the narrative around high-profile legal cases, such as those involving President Trump.

Insight into the legal strategy of appealing decisions in the case of President Trump, emphasizing the importance of the Appellate Division.

Speculation on the final outcomes of President Trump's legal cases, including predictions of potential payments and the impact on his assets.

Discussion on the broader implications of the legal cases against President Trump, including the potential impact on the upcoming 2024 elections.

Transcripts

00:01

[Music]

00:10

me why would you bet on Goliath when we

00:13

got bet David valueing giv values

00:15

contagious this world are entrepreneurs

00:17

we get no value to haters run homie look

00:20

what I become I'm I'm the

00:23

[Music]

00:24

one okay episode 386 folks there's so

00:28

many different weird legal things going

00:30

on having to do with law lawyers you

00:33

know these lawyers how they are they

00:35

know the law and you need to talk to

00:37

them to educate us on what's going on

00:39

today we have uh probably the most

00:42

famous lawyer in America today that you

00:44

see on TV pretty much every week and she

00:47

likes to fight I don't know why she

00:49

likes fights she likes picking fights

00:51

she likes it when they pick fights

00:52

against her but she doesn't back down we

00:55

have the great Alina habba in the house

00:56

today how are you Alina hi I'm good it's

00:59

been a long time we haven't seen you for

01:01

a long time everything good A little

01:02

busy yeah that's good very good but no

01:05

uh obviously we got a lot of stories

01:06

guys we're going to be going through

01:07

today for sure want to get an update

01:10

with what's happening with the president

01:11

Trump with all the different uh legal

01:14

battles uh uh Tom I think you just gave

01:17

a uh uh update this morning that the SP

01:19

SPF case the judge is the same judge

01:23

that was on the Ean Carroll case if I'm

01:26

not mistaken that's correct so it'll be

01:28

interesting to see how he handles that

01:30

that you know with SPF would get you get

01:32

some of your feedback on that then

01:34

there's this guy I don't know if you've

01:35

heard of him this guy's name is Puff

01:36

Daddy P Diddy he uh he's going through

01:38

some legal issues we have some videos of

01:42

a guy that uh he claims other people

01:44

like it his way what's his name uh uh I

01:46

think his name is Usher if I'm not

01:48

mistaken right he has a video that came

01:51

out talking about Diddy there's a couple

01:53

Justin Bieber videos which we'll show

01:55

Rob I'm sure you have and then aside

01:57

from that we have some stories from

01:59

ronom Daniel she got paid uh highest

02:02

paid person on NBC apparently 20 minutes

02:04

she she was getting paid $30,000 an hour

02:07

can you imagine Neo a contract like that

02:08

she gets paid $30,000 an hour we'll tell

02:10

you the math on how that worked out stay

02:12

tuned you'll see why it's

02:14

$330,000 an hour it take a few minutes

02:17

to fully see what's going on there

02:19

Pennsylvania voter ballot you know all

02:22

of a sudden is saying we need to know

02:24

the dates we need to all the information

02:26

so some people are not happy some people

02:28

are happy but it's progress towards

02:30

actual

02:31

accountability with um property with uh

02:35

what do you call it with voting and then

02:37

John Stewart you know everybody's

02:39

talking about how much you know

02:41

president Trump overvalued his

02:42

properties some data came up that John

02:45

Stewart is apparently a big fan of

02:47

Trump's uh you know philosophy and he

02:49

also increased his home value labeling

02:51

it you know overvalued by

02:54

829 John what a capitalist what a

02:57

capital what a capitalist the great John

03:00

everybody does it we all

03:03

get 29 Tish we we'll we'll find out in

03:07

by the way did you guys hear about the

03:08

warnings from FBI did you did you see

03:10

the warning about this weekend this is

03:12

serious warnings from FBI saying Hamas

03:15

is planning on attacking different like

03:17

an a 911 type of attack this weekend

03:20

literally I'll show you the video that's

03:22

being shown and they're they're they're

03:24

targeting uh Jewish I think

03:27

it's uh uh anyways they're targeting

03:31

Christian churches you'll see what it is

03:33

the update will be given I have the

03:34

video I'll sh that with you guys Easter

03:35

weekend A lot of people be in churches

03:37

yes I I have some stuff on that and then

03:40

uh uh I'll show you one clip on who

03:43

Nickelodeon is thinking about their new

03:45

CEO I think it's very important for you

03:46

guys see who's going to be Nickelodeon's

03:47

first CEO great and then Alex Jones had

03:50

scho on I don't know if you saw this

03:52

Alex Jones had the

03:53

rabbi and they were going back and forth

03:56

it's a little awkward it's a little bit

03:58

uncomfortable but he's a rabbi so we

03:59

have to watch it to see what you his

04:01

Holiness very very important what's

04:03

going on with that so anyways and we got

04:04

a few other stories having said that

04:06

Alina what is the latest with President

04:08

Trump's case obviously everybody for the

04:11

longest time was saying Monday Monday

04:13

it's going to happen Monday

04:15

454 he's going to have to pay if he

04:17

doesn't seize his assets you know the

04:19

view I can't wait I want to see that you

04:22

know seizing his assets and the property

04:24

I want to see all of that stuff what is

04:25

the latest what's been happening so

04:28

we're winning and I always tell people

04:30

you know this is the long game okay we

04:33

are in a corrupt system there's no

04:35

question about it so people love to say

04:38

look he's gonna get we're gonna go over

04:40

there and Tish James is going to take

04:41

the keys to Trump Tower I think uh

04:43

whoopy Goldberg and all of them got

04:45

excited about putting a chain around

04:47

Trump Tower and literally were were

04:50

taunting um it was a really pathetic

04:53

site actually and uh it didn't happen

04:56

why because the appal division read our

05:00

papers saw that there are reasons for a

05:02

stay saw that it absolutely is

05:05

ridiculous to have somebody lose an

05:08

asset while the Appel division hasn't

05:09

had an opportunity to look at the

05:11

injustices look at the decision making

05:13

that was so flawed and frankly the

05:15

motivation on this case was flawed she

05:17

was motivated to bring this case before

05:19

she was even in office that's what she

05:22

ran on Miss James so that in itself

05:25

selective prosecution happens to be

05:27

illegal it shouldn't happen um

05:30

look they stay it they dropped it they

05:32

said we're not taking assets everything

05:33

is Frozen not only and this is one thing

05:35

that nobody talks about they didn't just

05:37

say you're not paying that amount of

05:39

money which by the way is almost close

05:41

to a billion dollars with a bond because

05:43

you have to pay 10% more plus you have

05:45

to pay interest the judges said no we're

05:48

stopping everything you're not enforcing

05:50

this you're going to put 175 mil which

05:52

is still crazy in a bank but we're also

05:56

not enforcing any decision against the

05:58

defendants not to to be able to work in

06:00

New York and real estate we're also not

06:03

enforcing the decisions against Alan

06:05

weiselberg Jeff M people that did

06:07

nothing wrong that were working for a

06:09

company and did their job and truly did

06:11

nothing wrong nobody did um and every

06:14

single part of that decision from

06:16

judging Goran that Twisted weird

06:18

decision weird looking guy he every

06:20

single thing was put on hold everything

06:23

while we have the opportunity now to say

06:26

this is what I was screaming about

06:27

outside the courtroom steps every day

06:29

you know so we're on hold and and I mean

06:32

we're on hold for an expensive price but

06:34

at least we're seeing a little bit of

06:35

you know due process and and sense how

06:38

come up with the 175 million I don't

06:41

know um I I have no idea you know it

06:43

wasn't in there there wasn't any

06:45

qualification Alina are they starting to

06:47

figure out that this tactic that they're

06:48

using is not it's like it's done it's

06:51

not going to work we could call the DNC

06:52

and ask them I'm not sure you know I I

06:54

don't understand how they couldn't see

06:58

that they're overreaching

07:00

has really hurt them because Donald

07:03

Trump has always been famous he has

07:06

always been a very smart businessman

07:07

which is why I think he's a very good

07:09

president he attacks things from a

07:11

business perspective which I think some

07:13

presidents and some politicians frankly

07:15

do lack that that experience right um

07:19

and because of that they've attacked him

07:22

so badly that now you've taken a

07:24

billionaire and made him sympathetic

07:27

because you're hurt you're trying trying

07:29

to hurt him it's so obvious that now

07:32

we've got people from the left the

07:34

middles they're coming to our side and

07:36

saying who this is just too much you

07:39

know they're going to do this to me what

07:41

am I going to do I don't have habba

07:42

outside screaming you know what are you

07:45

going to do and that's been my message

07:47

always is um you know they're doing it

07:49

to him but they'll do it to us they'll

07:51

do it to me I'm sure they'll do it to

07:52

everybody and that's what scares me so

07:55

that's that's really it's the motivation

07:56

is really not just president Trump it's

07:58

America so let me ask you this so This

08:00

175 we're talking about okay it has to

08:02

be in an account fine he gets puts that

08:04

cash no problem if if we size up the

08:08

enemy of President Trump as being

08:10

deceptive dark divisive uh willing to do

08:14

anything to eliminate him as a candidate

08:17

going into 2024 November 5th anything

08:20

they can do right to spin the story and

08:22

say look at him now he's part of the

08:23

establishment he's going to New York

08:25

begging people for money Wall Street all

08:26

this stuff if if that was the case he

08:29

still got a few more cases open is it is

08:32

it possible that they may come up and

08:34

say yeah for this one you have to pay

08:35

$280 million this one's going to be $73

08:37

million another $128 million another 199

08:40

can they keep doing this between now and

08:43

October to just really deplete all of

08:45

his

08:46

savings so look the reality is he's an

08:50

incredibly wealthy man um he his wealth

08:53

like all wealthy individuals that have

08:55

intelligence is being put to work it's

08:58

in buildings it's in real estate it's in

09:00

hotels it's in golf um they're not you

09:04

know whatever they're going to try and

09:05

do they forget who they're dealing with

09:07

number one but realistically Patrick

09:09

what we do have in front of us is really

09:12

not the civil suits the civil suits uh

09:14

we're already done and if if you what

09:17

you're asking I believe already happened

09:18

we had the Carol lawsuit he got hit with

09:21

an insane and that and that was a suit

09:24

that I obviously did um we had already

09:27

lost prior and

09:29

we have not been heard on Appeal on that

09:31

first loss this is the 83.3 milon 83.3

09:34

million that was the first one which

09:35

actually turns out to be 91 million when

09:37

you look at it with the bond okay with

09:39

the 10% you have to put 10% on top

09:41

people think you put 10% into the court

09:44

you put the entire amount plus 10% into

09:46

the Appel division so it's a number that

09:49

the Court gives plus 10% plus the

09:52

interest on the bond plus whatever they

09:54

get in fees it's plus plus plus so we

09:57

already got that hit I did that trial 2

10:01

weeks after uh Leticia James trial ended

10:05

I was on that trial for 4 months the

10:07

judge Eng Goran waited to put his

10:09

decision until after the jury came out

10:12

with Carol so we had that happen we had

10:16

that happen it was 91 million and then

10:18

Tish James her original complaint if you

10:20

look was $250 million in the middle of

10:23

the trial towards the end she changes it

10:27

and says now I want more not because the

10:29

fact facts were bad frankly the facts

10:30

were good Deutsche Bank came took the

10:32

stance that he was a whale of the client

10:34

we actually wanted him because we wanted

10:35

his connections Zurich still ensures us

10:38

you know all these things the judge

10:40

didn't care Tish asked for more he gave

10:43

exactly what she wanted there was no

10:45

consideration for Witnesses or facts or

10:47

law it's all crazy and come with so it

10:50

was 91 then 375 they're out of thin air

10:53

their own expert said even if we looked

10:56

at the what this judge is saying is an

10:58

over

10:59

okay he's also saying marago is 18

11:02

million yeah okay so sure if you think

11:05

Maraga is worth 18 million well there's

11:07

about over a billion dollars of of over

11:10

it's ridiculous there is no way if

11:12

maro's 18 million we should all buy it

11:15

tomorrow and flip it and we'll all be

11:17

we'll all be worth hundreds of millions

11:19

of dollars I mean it's crazy but if you

11:21

look at it that way yeah that was

11:23

already planned Patrick that's what they

11:24

did they did 91 then they did 375 375

11:27

becomes more like 600 million so they

11:29

were trying to take it by the way

11:30

remember Tish asked for his statements

11:32

asked for financials she changed the

11:35

number based on what cash he had it's

11:37

dis it's there's 0% question in my mind

11:40

that's what happened so so Lena if you

11:41

ask that like the average person that

11:42

doesn't know about law doesn't know

11:43

about all this and they're looking at

11:45

from the outside looking in even left or

11:47

right and they're saying to themselves

11:49

how the hell are they getting away with

11:50

this and nobody's saying anything in the

11:53

legal World in government and Congress

11:56

so somebody should be like all right

11:57

guys time out besides I don't care what

11:58

the hell who the person is what are you

12:00

guys doing this is blatantly obvious

12:02

that it's a tactic to try to take like

12:04

keep them off the ballot it's ridiculous

12:05

it's ridiculous but I think that I think

12:07

that we have a problem with

12:08

accountability with the Democrat side

12:10

and I'm not sure we figured out how to

12:12

tackle them we have to I think president

12:15

Trump um would make everything even

12:17

Stephen when he gets back into office I

12:20

think that what we have to deal with is

12:23

exactly that we've got we could keep

12:26

talking about it I could go on TV every

12:27

day and talk about how we White House

12:29

logs that came out while I was on trial

12:31

I'm sitting in the back room and I find

12:33

out that there were White House logs

12:34

that Tish James visited the White House

12:36

yeah before and after the complaint was

12:39

filed what how was that not on the news

12:42

if I didn't have such a loud mouth

12:44

people wouldn't hear the truth so so I'm

12:46

looking at it and I'm going what how is

12:48

this possible and it didn't get covered

12:51

it didn't get covered I mean who that

12:53

public info if I right now wanted to

12:55

find out that she's visited the White

12:56

House that that's public I could see

12:58

yeah yeah it's crazy so I I'm looking at

13:01

it and I'm saying how do we hold them

13:03

accountable well these are elected

13:05

officials you know we had people there

13:07

we have gag orders being put on us how

13:08

is that okay gag orders on lawyers yeah

13:12

imagine I go to court I'm your lawyer

13:15

you and the judge says Hab no no you

13:17

can't talk about a couple things here

13:19

what how about the Carol Keys the judge

13:22

asked me the questions I was going to

13:24

ask my client in public in front of the

13:26

media before he took the stand and then

13:28

ask me what his answers would be I was

13:31

like excuse

13:33

me nobody talks about it transcript ask

13:36

for the trans it's there it's crazy yeah

13:39

this is judicial activism at its worst

13:41

judicial activism is where the judge is

13:44

sort of acting as a lobbyist on behalf

13:45

of a political side and in civil cases

13:48

it can run a muck as long as you get a

13:50

dirty judge at least at the federal

13:52

level you know you have Federal

13:53

sentencing guidelines right which was

13:56

that that a sentence will be this much

13:59

might be this much and can be extended

14:01

to this much on the circumstances that

14:03

that that the uh you know the the that

14:06

basically the AGS first States or

14:08

whatever that are participating and

14:09

remand things like to this southern

14:11

district of New York for business and it

14:13

looks terrible and they say okay well

14:15

then your guidelines here but you're

14:16

going to get this but for civil Vinnie

14:18

civil can run a m all you need is a bad

14:21

dirty judge he puts a gag order here he

14:23

impunes a witness here he prevents us

14:26

here he suppresses us here and you're

14:28

literally a puppet and you feel like

14:30

you're in the middle of Congress during

14:31

a debate for a bill rather than in the

14:34

halls of Justice with rules and

14:36

regulations we're we are supposed to

14:38

have you know the executive the judicial

14:41

and then legislative legislative is

14:43

where we run a muck until we figure it

14:45

out judicial were supposed to have

14:47

procedures and laws and standards and

14:49

things that go in there this didn't

14:51

happen they basically decided that the