SBF Sentenced, Diddy Grooming Allegations & Trump Civil Suit w/ Alina Habba | PBD Podcast | Ep. 386
Summary
TLDRThe transcript discusses various legal and social issues, including the case of President Trump's legal battles, the overvaluation of John Stewart's property, and the hiring of R. McDaniel at NBC. It also touches on the allegations against Diddy, the Nickelodeon CEO announcement, and the Baltimore Bridge incident. The conversation highlights the complexities of the legal system, the influence of media, and the importance of accountability and justice.
Takeaways
- 🎙️ The discussion revolves around various legal issues and high-profile personalities, including President Trump, Puff Daddy, and R. McDaniel.
- 💰 R. McDaniel was reportedly paid $30,000 per minute for her short-lived contract with NBC, sparking controversy and internal backlash.
- 👩💼 The hiring of R. McDaniel at NBC was met with strong disapproval from employees, leading to her contract being terminated.
- 🚨 There are concerns about potential upcoming legal challenges for President Trump, especially as he prepares for a possible 2024 run.
- 📺 The conversation touches on the role of the media in shaping public perception of legal cases and political figures.
- 🤝 The importance of due process and the potential for political motivations to influence legal outcomes is highlighted.
- 📈 The discussion includes references to specific legal cases, such as the Carol lawsuit and the Trump Organization's financial dealings.
- 🏛️ The role of judges in the legal system and the potential for bias or political influence is critiqued.
- 💸 The financial aspects of legal cases, including the posting of bonds and the impact on assets, are discussed in the context of President Trump's legal battles.
- 🤯 The conversation emphasizes the complexity and unpredictability of the legal system, especially for high-profile individuals.
- 🌐 The global implications of legal decisions and the potential for international scrutiny are also considered.
Q & A
What is the main topic of discussion in the transcript?
-The main topic of discussion in the transcript revolves around legal issues, specifically focusing on high-profile cases involving celebrities and public figures, including potential legal battles involving Donald Trump, Puff Daddy, and others.
Who is Alina Habba and what is her role in the discussion?
-Alina Habba is a famous lawyer in America who is known for her appearances on TV. In the discussion, she provides insights and updates on various legal cases and issues, particularly those involving President Trump.
What is the significance of the SPF case mentioned in the transcript?
-The SPF case is significant because it involves a legal battle with President Trump and is being handled by the same judge who was on the Ean Carroll case. The discussion suggests that the outcome of this case could have implications for Trump's legal standing.
What are some of the other legal issues discussed in the transcript?
-Other legal issues discussed in the transcript include Puff Daddy's legal troubles, the overvaluation of John Stewart's property, and the contract of a high-paid individual on NBC.
What is the claim made by the speaker about the motivation behind the legal cases against President Trump?
-The speaker claims that the motivation behind the legal cases against President Trump is politically driven, with the aim of damaging his reputation and potentially affecting his chances in the 2024 elections.
How does the discussion suggest the legal system is being used as a tool for political purposes?
-The discussion suggests that the legal system is being used as a tool for political purposes by highlighting cases where high-profile individuals, particularly those with political connections or influence, are involved. It implies that the legal proceedings are not always based on impartial justice but can be influenced by political agendas.
What is the speaker's view on the role of the media in legal cases?
-The speaker believes that the media plays a significant role in shaping the narrative around legal cases. They suggest that the media often focuses on stories that align with their own biases, potentially influencing public opinion and the outcome of legal proceedings.
What is the significance of the mention of the FBI warning about potential terror attacks?
-The mention of the FBI warning about potential terror attacks serves to highlight the broader context of security concerns in the country. It suggests that there are ongoing efforts to prevent and mitigate threats, but also underscores the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies.
How does the discussion relate to the current political climate in the United States?
-The discussion reflects the current political climate in the United States by touching on issues such as the legal battles involving the former president, the role of the media in shaping political narratives, and the broader context of security concerns. It suggests a complex interplay between legal proceedings, media coverage, and political motivations.
What is the speaker's stance on the concept of personal responsibility in the context of legal cases?
-The speaker seems to support the concept of personal responsibility, particularly when discussing the legal issues of high-profile individuals. They imply that those involved in legal cases should face the consequences of their actions, regardless of their social or political status.
Outlines
🎶 Introduction and Overview of Legal Issues
The video begins with a discussion on the value of entrepreneurs and the legal challenges they face. The host introduces a famous lawyer, Alina Habba, who frequently appears on TV and is known for her tenacity in legal battles. The conversation quickly shifts to various ongoing legal issues, including those involving President Trump, Puff Daddy, and other high-profile individuals. The host also mentions a warning from the FBI about potential terror attacks and shares an update on the search for a new CEO at Nickelodeon.
📚 Legal Battles and the Appeal Process
Alina Habba provides insights into the legal battles involving President Trump, emphasizing the corruption within the system and the selective prosecution. She discusses the SPF case and the controversial decisions made by the judge, highlighting the importance of the appeal process. Habba also addresses the public's reaction to the legal proceedings and the potential impact on Trump's assets and reputation leading up to the 2024 elections.
🏛️ Critique of the Justice System and Political Motivations
The conversation delves into a critique of the justice system, with Habba questioning the motivations behind the cases against Trump. She alleges that the cases are politically motivated and that the judicial activism is at its worst. Habba also discusses the gag orders on lawyers and the lack of accountability within the legal world, emphasizing the need for change and the potential consequences of the ongoing legal tactics.
🎭 The Role of the Judge in the Courtroom
Habba continues to discuss the power and influence of judges in the courtroom, particularly in civil cases. She argues that the judge's decisions can significantly impact the outcome of a case, and that the lack of a jury in certain cases can lead to injustice. Habba provides examples of how judges can manipulate the legal process and expresses concern over the potential misuse of power in high-profile cases.
🤝 The Impact of Legal Proceedings on Public Perception
The host and Habba discuss the impact of legal proceedings on public perception, particularly in cases involving celebrities and public figures. They explore how the media can shape narratives and influence public opinion. Habba shares her experiences of being portrayed negatively in the media and the challenges of countering these narratives. The conversation also touches on the importance of maintaining ethical standards in legal practice.
📈 Financial Implications of Legal Battles
The discussion shifts to the financial implications of ongoing legal battles, with Habba providing an in-depth analysis of the costs associated with civil cases. She explains the process of calculating damages and the potential financial impact on individuals and companies. The conversation also covers the importance of having a strong legal team and the financial burden of defending against multiple legal cases.
🎥 Public Figures and Legal Accountability
The conversation focuses on the legal accountability of public figures, with specific references to John Stewart and his involvement in overvaluing property. Habba and the host discuss the double standards in the legal system and the importance of holding everyone, regardless of their status, accountable for their actions. The discussion also touches on the role of the media in shaping public perception of legal issues.
🏠 Squatter Rights and Property Law
The host and Habba discuss the issue of squatter rights and property law, with a focus on the different laws across various states. They highlight the recent legislation in Florida that eliminates squatter rights and empowers property owners. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of such laws and the need for reform in other states to protect property rights.
💼 Legal Careers and Political Affiliations
The discussion turns to the challenges faced by legal professionals, particularly those with political affiliations that may not align with their employers. Habba shares her experiences and insights into navigating the legal field and the importance of maintaining integrity in the face of political pressure. The conversation also explores the potential career paths for individuals in the legal profession.
📺 Media Bias and the Role of News Networks
Habba and the host critique the media's role in shaping public opinion and the perceived bias in news coverage. They discuss the recent controversy surrounding R. McDaniel's short-lived tenure at NBC and the internal and external reactions to her hiring and subsequent dismissal. The conversation highlights the influence of media bias on public discourse and the challenges faced by journalists in maintaining objectivity.
🎥 Celebrity Influence and Legal Allegations
The conversation focuses on the influence of celebrities and the legal allegations they face. The host and Habba discuss the recent allegations against Diddy and the impact of such allegations on the individuals involved. They also explore the role of the media in reporting on these allegations and the potential consequences for the accused and their careers.
🚨 FBI Warnings and National Security
The host discusses the recent FBI warnings about potential terror attacks and the increased risk of violence in the US. They talk about the potential targets and the need for vigilance, especially in places of worship. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of these threats and the government's response to ensuring public safety.
💼 Legal Proceedings and Sentencing
The conversation concludes with a discussion on the legal proceedings and sentencing of high-profile individuals, specifically referencing the case of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF). Habba shares her insights into the potential outcomes of the case and the influence of political donations on legal decisions. The host and Habba also discuss the role of the judge in the sentencing process and the potential impact on public perception.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Legal battles
💡Corrupt system
💡Selective prosecution
💡Asset seizure
💡Judicial activism
💡Appeals process
💡Political campaign
💡Accountability
💡Civil suits
💡Gag orders
Highlights
Discussion on the legal case of President Trump and the handling of the SPF case by the same judge from the Ean Carroll case.
Mention of Puff Daddy's legal issues and the controversy surrounding his interactions with other celebrities like Usher and Justin Bieber.
Discussion on the high payment received by a news reporter at NBC, highlighting the financial aspects of media contracts.
Talk about Pennsylvania voter ballot issues and the push for accountability in voting practices.
John Stewart's revelation of Trump's property overvaluation and its connection to the current legal debates.
FBI warnings about potential terror attacks planned by Hamas, emphasizing the need for vigilance, especially during the Easter weekend.
Speculation on the new CEO of Nickelodeon and the implications of such an appointment.
Alex Jones' interaction with a rabbi, highlighting the importance of understanding different perspectives.
Update on President Trump's legal battles and the strategy used against him by the opposing side.
Discussion on the potential financial impact on President Trump's assets due to ongoing legal cases.
Analysis of the legal system's handling of civil suits against President Trump, focusing on the role of the judge in the Carol lawsuit.
Critique of the judicial system, specifically how judges can influence cases without a jury and the potential for bias.
Discussion on the role of the media in shaping the narrative around high-profile legal cases, such as those involving President Trump.
Insight into the legal strategy of appealing decisions in the case of President Trump, emphasizing the importance of the Appellate Division.
Speculation on the final outcomes of President Trump's legal cases, including predictions of potential payments and the impact on his assets.
Discussion on the broader implications of the legal cases against President Trump, including the potential impact on the upcoming 2024 elections.
Transcripts
[Music]
me why would you bet on Goliath when we
got bet David valueing giv values
contagious this world are entrepreneurs
we get no value to haters run homie look
what I become I'm I'm the
[Music]
one okay episode 386 folks there's so
many different weird legal things going
on having to do with law lawyers you
know these lawyers how they are they
know the law and you need to talk to
them to educate us on what's going on
today we have uh probably the most
famous lawyer in America today that you
see on TV pretty much every week and she
likes to fight I don't know why she
likes fights she likes picking fights
she likes it when they pick fights
against her but she doesn't back down we
have the great Alina habba in the house
today how are you Alina hi I'm good it's
been a long time we haven't seen you for
a long time everything good A little
busy yeah that's good very good but no
uh obviously we got a lot of stories
guys we're going to be going through
today for sure want to get an update
with what's happening with the president
Trump with all the different uh legal
battles uh uh Tom I think you just gave
a uh uh update this morning that the SP
SPF case the judge is the same judge
that was on the Ean Carroll case if I'm
not mistaken that's correct so it'll be
interesting to see how he handles that
that you know with SPF would get you get
some of your feedback on that then
there's this guy I don't know if you've
heard of him this guy's name is Puff
Daddy P Diddy he uh he's going through
some legal issues we have some videos of
a guy that uh he claims other people
like it his way what's his name uh uh I
think his name is Usher if I'm not
mistaken right he has a video that came
out talking about Diddy there's a couple
Justin Bieber videos which we'll show
Rob I'm sure you have and then aside
from that we have some stories from
ronom Daniel she got paid uh highest
paid person on NBC apparently 20 minutes
she she was getting paid $30,000 an hour
can you imagine Neo a contract like that
she gets paid $30,000 an hour we'll tell
you the math on how that worked out stay
tuned you'll see why it's
$330,000 an hour it take a few minutes
to fully see what's going on there
Pennsylvania voter ballot you know all
of a sudden is saying we need to know
the dates we need to all the information
so some people are not happy some people
are happy but it's progress towards
actual
accountability with um property with uh
what do you call it with voting and then
John Stewart you know everybody's
talking about how much you know
president Trump overvalued his
properties some data came up that John
Stewart is apparently a big fan of
Trump's uh you know philosophy and he
also increased his home value labeling
it you know overvalued by
829 John what a capitalist what a
capital what a capitalist the great John
everybody does it we all
get 29 Tish we we'll we'll find out in
by the way did you guys hear about the
warnings from FBI did you did you see
the warning about this weekend this is
serious warnings from FBI saying Hamas
is planning on attacking different like
an a 911 type of attack this weekend
literally I'll show you the video that's
being shown and they're they're they're
targeting uh Jewish I think
it's uh uh anyways they're targeting
Christian churches you'll see what it is
the update will be given I have the
video I'll sh that with you guys Easter
weekend A lot of people be in churches
yes I I have some stuff on that and then
uh uh I'll show you one clip on who
Nickelodeon is thinking about their new
CEO I think it's very important for you
guys see who's going to be Nickelodeon's
first CEO great and then Alex Jones had
scho on I don't know if you saw this
Alex Jones had the
rabbi and they were going back and forth
it's a little awkward it's a little bit
uncomfortable but he's a rabbi so we
have to watch it to see what you his
Holiness very very important what's
going on with that so anyways and we got
a few other stories having said that
Alina what is the latest with President
Trump's case obviously everybody for the
longest time was saying Monday Monday
it's going to happen Monday
454 he's going to have to pay if he
doesn't seize his assets you know the
view I can't wait I want to see that you
know seizing his assets and the property
I want to see all of that stuff what is
the latest what's been happening so
we're winning and I always tell people
you know this is the long game okay we
are in a corrupt system there's no
question about it so people love to say
look he's gonna get we're gonna go over
there and Tish James is going to take
the keys to Trump Tower I think uh
whoopy Goldberg and all of them got
excited about putting a chain around
Trump Tower and literally were were
taunting um it was a really pathetic
site actually and uh it didn't happen
why because the appal division read our
papers saw that there are reasons for a
stay saw that it absolutely is
ridiculous to have somebody lose an
asset while the Appel division hasn't
had an opportunity to look at the
injustices look at the decision making
that was so flawed and frankly the
motivation on this case was flawed she
was motivated to bring this case before
she was even in office that's what she
ran on Miss James so that in itself
selective prosecution happens to be
illegal it shouldn't happen um
look they stay it they dropped it they
said we're not taking assets everything
is Frozen not only and this is one thing
that nobody talks about they didn't just
say you're not paying that amount of
money which by the way is almost close
to a billion dollars with a bond because
you have to pay 10% more plus you have
to pay interest the judges said no we're
stopping everything you're not enforcing
this you're going to put 175 mil which
is still crazy in a bank but we're also
not enforcing any decision against the
defendants not to to be able to work in
New York and real estate we're also not
enforcing the decisions against Alan
weiselberg Jeff M people that did
nothing wrong that were working for a
company and did their job and truly did
nothing wrong nobody did um and every
single part of that decision from
judging Goran that Twisted weird
decision weird looking guy he every
single thing was put on hold everything
while we have the opportunity now to say
this is what I was screaming about
outside the courtroom steps every day
you know so we're on hold and and I mean
we're on hold for an expensive price but
at least we're seeing a little bit of
you know due process and and sense how
come up with the 175 million I don't
know um I I have no idea you know it
wasn't in there there wasn't any
qualification Alina are they starting to
figure out that this tactic that they're
using is not it's like it's done it's
not going to work we could call the DNC
and ask them I'm not sure you know I I
don't understand how they couldn't see
that they're overreaching
has really hurt them because Donald
Trump has always been famous he has
always been a very smart businessman
which is why I think he's a very good
president he attacks things from a
business perspective which I think some
presidents and some politicians frankly
do lack that that experience right um
and because of that they've attacked him
so badly that now you've taken a
billionaire and made him sympathetic
because you're hurt you're trying trying
to hurt him it's so obvious that now
we've got people from the left the
middles they're coming to our side and
saying who this is just too much you
know they're going to do this to me what
am I going to do I don't have habba
outside screaming you know what are you
going to do and that's been my message
always is um you know they're doing it
to him but they'll do it to us they'll
do it to me I'm sure they'll do it to
everybody and that's what scares me so
that's that's really it's the motivation
is really not just president Trump it's
America so let me ask you this so This
175 we're talking about okay it has to
be in an account fine he gets puts that
cash no problem if if we size up the
enemy of President Trump as being
deceptive dark divisive uh willing to do
anything to eliminate him as a candidate
going into 2024 November 5th anything
they can do right to spin the story and
say look at him now he's part of the
establishment he's going to New York
begging people for money Wall Street all
this stuff if if that was the case he
still got a few more cases open is it is
it possible that they may come up and
say yeah for this one you have to pay
$280 million this one's going to be $73
million another $128 million another 199
can they keep doing this between now and
October to just really deplete all of
his
savings so look the reality is he's an
incredibly wealthy man um he his wealth
like all wealthy individuals that have
intelligence is being put to work it's
in buildings it's in real estate it's in
hotels it's in golf um they're not you
know whatever they're going to try and
do they forget who they're dealing with
number one but realistically Patrick
what we do have in front of us is really
not the civil suits the civil suits uh
we're already done and if if you what
you're asking I believe already happened
we had the Carol lawsuit he got hit with
an insane and that and that was a suit
that I obviously did um we had already
lost prior and
we have not been heard on Appeal on that
first loss this is the 83.3 milon 83.3
million that was the first one which
actually turns out to be 91 million when
you look at it with the bond okay with
the 10% you have to put 10% on top
people think you put 10% into the court
you put the entire amount plus 10% into
the Appel division so it's a number that
the Court gives plus 10% plus the
interest on the bond plus whatever they
get in fees it's plus plus plus so we
already got that hit I did that trial 2
weeks after uh Leticia James trial ended
I was on that trial for 4 months the
judge Eng Goran waited to put his
decision until after the jury came out
with Carol so we had that happen we had
that happen it was 91 million and then
Tish James her original complaint if you
look was $250 million in the middle of
the trial towards the end she changes it
and says now I want more not because the
fact facts were bad frankly the facts
were good Deutsche Bank came took the
stance that he was a whale of the client
we actually wanted him because we wanted
his connections Zurich still ensures us
you know all these things the judge
didn't care Tish asked for more he gave
exactly what she wanted there was no
consideration for Witnesses or facts or
law it's all crazy and come with so it
was 91 then 375 they're out of thin air
their own expert said even if we looked
at the what this judge is saying is an
over
okay he's also saying marago is 18
million yeah okay so sure if you think
Maraga is worth 18 million well there's
about over a billion dollars of of over
it's ridiculous there is no way if
maro's 18 million we should all buy it
tomorrow and flip it and we'll all be
we'll all be worth hundreds of millions
of dollars I mean it's crazy but if you
look at it that way yeah that was
already planned Patrick that's what they
did they did 91 then they did 375 375
becomes more like 600 million so they
were trying to take it by the way
remember Tish asked for his statements
asked for financials she changed the
number based on what cash he had it's
dis it's there's 0% question in my mind
that's what happened so so Lena if you
ask that like the average person that
doesn't know about law doesn't know
about all this and they're looking at
from the outside looking in even left or
right and they're saying to themselves
how the hell are they getting away with
this and nobody's saying anything in the
legal World in government and Congress
so somebody should be like all right
guys time out besides I don't care what
the hell who the person is what are you
guys doing this is blatantly obvious
that it's a tactic to try to take like
keep them off the ballot it's ridiculous
it's ridiculous but I think that I think
that we have a problem with
accountability with the Democrat side
and I'm not sure we figured out how to
tackle them we have to I think president
Trump um would make everything even
Stephen when he gets back into office I
think that what we have to deal with is
exactly that we've got we could keep
talking about it I could go on TV every
day and talk about how we White House
logs that came out while I was on trial
I'm sitting in the back room and I find
out that there were White House logs
that Tish James visited the White House
yeah before and after the complaint was
filed what how was that not on the news
if I didn't have such a loud mouth
people wouldn't hear the truth so so I'm
looking at it and I'm going what how is
this possible and it didn't get covered
it didn't get covered I mean who that
public info if I right now wanted to
find out that she's visited the White
House that that's public I could see
yeah yeah it's crazy so I I'm looking at
it and I'm saying how do we hold them
accountable well these are elected
officials you know we had people there
we have gag orders being put on us how
is that okay gag orders on lawyers yeah
imagine I go to court I'm your lawyer
you and the judge says Hab no no you
can't talk about a couple things here
what how about the Carol Keys the judge
asked me the questions I was going to
ask my client in public in front of the
media before he took the stand and then
ask me what his answers would be I was
like excuse
me nobody talks about it transcript ask
for the trans it's there it's crazy yeah
this is judicial activism at its worst
judicial activism is where the judge is
sort of acting as a lobbyist on behalf
of a political side and in civil cases
it can run a muck as long as you get a
dirty judge at least at the federal
level you know you have Federal
sentencing guidelines right which was
that that a sentence will be this much
might be this much and can be extended
to this much on the circumstances that
that that the uh you know the the that
basically the AGS first States or
whatever that are participating and
remand things like to this southern
district of New York for business and it
looks terrible and they say okay well
then your guidelines here but you're
going to get this but for civil Vinnie
civil can run a m all you need is a bad
dirty judge he puts a gag order here he
impunes a witness here he prevents us
here he suppresses us here and you're
literally a puppet and you feel like
you're in the middle of Congress during
a debate for a bill rather than in the
halls of Justice with rules and
regulations we're we are supposed to
have you know the executive the judicial
and then legislative legislative is
where we run a muck until we figure it
out judicial were supposed to have
procedures and laws and standards and
things that go in there this didn't
happen they basically decided that the