Anti-Fandom and Fascism are the Same Thing
Summary
TLDRThe video script discusses the historical impact of fear-mongering on American society, highlighting the anti-comic book crusade of the 1950s and the Red Scare's influence on contemporary politics and culture. It connects these historical events to modern anti-fandom movements, which it argues are driven by regressive ideologies and contribute to the spread of misinformation, ultimately urging viewers to be aware and active in opposing such narratives.
Takeaways
- π The 1950s saw a rise in conservative fear-mongering leading to a destructive socio-political phenomenon.
- π« Dr. Frederick Wertham's crusade against comic books in 1948 and the publication of 'Seduction of the Innocent' in 1954 sparked a moral panic.
- π In response to Wertham's claims, the US Senate held hearings on the harmful effects of comic books, contributing to juvenile delinquency concerns.
- π· The comic book industry self-censored, creating a code that restricted content, including authority figures' portrayal and the use of certain words like 'horror' or 'terror'.
- π³οΈβπ Sexuality, drug use, seduction, and homosexuality were effectively censored, with only traditional marriage and family values being promoted in comics.
- π Over time, these restrictive values faded, and the comic book code was eventually eliminated in 2011, seen as a relic of an era of misinformation and fear-mongering.
- π The Red Scare and Joseph McCarthy's anti-communist probes created a climate of fear and suspicion in the US during the post-WWII era.
- π€₯ The John Birch Society, linked to Donald Trump, continues to propagate baseless conspiracy theories and fear-mongering.
- π Modern neo-fascist conservatives and anti-fandoms use fear and misinformation to push regressive ideologies, often under the guise of pro-free speech or anti-political messaging.
- π The goal of anti-fandom networks is to attract new and casual fans with misinformation, potentially leading them down a path to adopting regressive ideologies.
- π There is no neutral position in the culture war; apathy and complacency are seen as indirect support for anti-fandom and fascism.
Q & A
What was Frederick Wertham's role in the 1950s comic book censorship?
-Frederick Wertham was a psychologist who began a crusade against comic books in 1948, claiming they had harmful effects on young readers. His criticisms led to the infamous 1954 publication 'Seduction of the Innocent' and subsequent U.S. Senate hearings on comic books, which resulted in the comic book industry adopting a strict self-censorship code.
What were some of the specific restrictions imposed by the comic book industry's self-censorship code?
-The comic book self-censorship code, implemented in response to Wertham's campaign and Senate hearings, included prohibitions on disrespecting authority figures like police and judges, using words like 'horror' or 'terror', and banning depictions of sexuality outside of traditional marriage, as well as any representation of drug use or homosexuality.
How did the 'Red Scare' in the post-World War II era affect American society?
-During the 'Red Scare', American leaders promoted intense fear of communist infiltration in various aspects of life, including education and media. Senator Joseph McCarthy notably led high-profile probes into alleged communist influences, creating a widespread climate of fear and suspicion across the United States.
What role did the John Birch Society play in American politics and how is it connected to modern events?
-The John Birch Society, a far-right political advocacy group, has historically promoted conspiracy theories about communist influences in America. The society's influence persists, often cited in connection with modern political figures and movements that leverage similar fear-mongering tactics about socialism and social progress.
How did anti-fandom movements like ComicsGate and the Phantom Menace use popular culture for their agendas?
-Movements like ComicsGate and the Phantom Menace have criticized changes in popular media, claiming that inclusion and progressive themes, dubbed as 'wokism', are destroying traditional fandoms. They often use these platforms to propagate broader conservative ideologies, mirroring historical fear-mongering tactics.
What impact did the comic book code have on the portrayal of romance and sexuality in comic books?
-The comic book code severely restricted the portrayal of romance and sexuality. It mandated that any depiction of passion or romantic interest must align with traditional marriage and family values, effectively banning portrayals of unmarried couples showing affection or any non-heteronormative relationships.
In what ways did McCarthyism create a climate of fear and suspicion in the U.S.?
-McCarthyism, led by Senator Joseph McCarthy, was characterized by aggressive investigations and accusations against individuals in government, Hollywood, and other sectors for being communist sympathizers. This created a pervasive climate of fear, where many were afraid to oppose McCarthy or could be blacklisted, often based on unsubstantiated accusations.
What are some modern equivalents of the comic book censorship and Red Scare as mentioned in the script?
-Modern equivalents include movements like anti-SJW and anti-woke groups in fandoms that claim to be fighting against political correctness and inclusion, similar to how comic book censorship sought to regulate content and the Red Scare promoted fear of communism. These contemporary movements often use social media to amplify their messages.
What does the term 'culture war' imply in the context of the script?
-In the script, 'culture war' refers to the ongoing conflicts within society over cultural values and norms, particularly around issues of race, sexuality, and gender. These are often framed by conservative movements as battles against progressive changes, using terminology that suggests a significant and disruptive conflict.
How does the phenomenon of anti-fandom contribute to political polarization, according to the script?
-Anti-fandoms contribute to political polarization by using cultural touchpoints like comics or movies to enforce conservative ideologies and resist progressive themes. They create divisive narratives that align with broader political conflicts, influencing fans and the public's perception of cultural and political issues.
Outlines
π The Historical Context of Fear-mongering and Censorship
This paragraph discusses the socio-political climate of the early 1950s, highlighting the role of conservative fear-mongering in launching destructive phenomena. It delves into the infamous work of psychologist Frederick Wertham, who initiated a baseless crusade against comic books, leading to the publication of 'Seduction of the Innocent' in 1954. This event triggered Senate hearings on the harmful effects of comic books and subsequently, the comic book industry's implementation of a self-censorship code. The code's vague restrictions effectively censored various aspects of comic content, including authority figures' portrayal, use of certain words, and depiction of sexuality or seduction. The paragraph also touches on the broader political context of the Red Scare, led by figures like Senator Joseph McCarthy, and the lasting impact of these events on American society, culture, and politics.
π The Misguided Fears in Modern Fandom and Politics
The second paragraph examines the continuation of fear-mongering and misinformation in modern times, particularly within conservative circles and nerd culture. It criticizes popular conservative figures and YouTubers who propagate the idea that 'social justice warriors' (SJWs) and 'wokeism' are destroying fandoms, using comics, Star Wars, and other media as tools to incite panic among uninformed audiences. The paragraph highlights the ignorance of these influencers regarding the historical social messaging in comics and their apolitical stance as a cover for regressive ideologies. It also discusses the Gamergate controversy and the transition of these views into other movements like Comics Gate and the Phantom Menace, emphasizing the superficial arguments as a facade for deeper prejudices and the rise of victim tallies as these groups become more comfortable with their true views.
π« The Anti-Fandom Movement and Its Regressive Impact
This paragraph focuses on the anti-fandom movement, describing it as an extension of modern fascism that permeates various cultural aspects, including fandoms. It criticizes the movement's lack of substantial policies or solutions, its contradictory nature, and its fuel from a juvenile desire to provoke and dominate the left. The paragraph also addresses the anti-fandom's narrative of a culture war against inclusion and acceptance, labeling it as a regressive anti-progress belief. It warns against the siphoning of new and casual fans into these regressive ideologies through the dominance of anti-fandom content in online algorithms and the production of low-information content. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing the importance of making a choice against anti-fandom and fascism, as neutrality or apathy inadvertently supports these harmful movements.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Fear-mongering
π‘Sedition of the Innocent
π‘Self-censorship
π‘Red Scare
π‘John Birch Society
π‘Neo-fascism
π‘Anti-fandom
π‘Cultural War
π‘McCarthyism
π‘Astroturf
π‘Fascism
Highlights
In the early 1950s, conservative fear-mongering initiated a destructive socio-political phenomenon.
The psychologist Frederick Wertham began a baseless crusade against comic books in 1948.
The publication of 'Seduction of the Innocent' in 1954 led to Senate hearings on the harmful effects of comic books.
The comic book industry responded with a self-censorship code, restricting content on authority figures, sexuality, and more.
The self-censorship code was in place for six decades before being eliminated in 2011.
The Red Scare, fueled by Senator Joseph McCarthy, created a climate of fear and suspicion across America.
The John Birch Society perpetuated conspiracy theories and influenced far-right politics, including during Trump's presidency.
Anti-fandoms and conservative influencers use fear-mongering to push a neo-fascist agenda under the guise of culture war.
These movements claim to be pro-free speech while actually promoting regressive and anti-progress beliefs.
Anti-fandoms target new and casual fans, potentially leading them down a path to fascism.
The anti-fandom phenomenon is an extension of modern fascism, affecting various cultural aspects including fandoms.
Conservatism and anti-fandoms are defined by what they are against, offering no real policies or solutions.
The transcript highlights the insidious nature of anti-fandom networks and their impact on impressionable individuals.
The struggle against anti-fandoms is portrayed as a battle for the soul of culture and society.
The narrative calls for a proactive stance against anti-fandom and fascism, stressing that neutrality is not an option.
The transcript ends with a rallying call to make a choice against anti-fandom and fascism, emphasizing the importance of standing up for values.
Transcripts
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
in the early 1950s a confluence of
conservative fear-mongering launched a
destructive socio-political phenomenon
that crept into the fabric of society
and thrives today despite evidence
against the claims despite reason
and decades of their doom saying being
shown
as false
the now disgraced psychologist frederick
wertham began his baseless crusade
against the popular medium of comic
books in 1948
in the spring of 1954 the infamous
seduction of the innocent was published
shortly after publication of the pearl
clutching tome the united states senate
convened hearings on harmful effects of
comic books as part of its investigation
into juvenile delinquency
in response to wertham's high-profile
criticisms and the senate investigation
the comic book industry implemented a
self-censorship code
these restrictions included not
portraying authority figures like police
and judges in a disrespectful manner nor
could comics use certain words like
horror or terror
the rules of the code were generally
vague with so much room for
interpretation as to effectively censor
publishers simply out of fear sexuality
of nearly any kind drug use even in
context of anti-drug messages seduction
or
sexual perversion which meant
homosexuality
all banned
any depiction of passion or romantic
interest had to be shown in context of
traditional marriage and family values
so unmarried couples couldn't kiss or
even imply physical interest in one
another there were many dubious
oppressive limits placed on comics for
six decades but as time went on and
those traditional regressive values slot
off of society the rules were more and
more ignored until eventually the code
was eliminated in 2011.
it had become a relic of a time when
white conservative men in power targeted
low information citizens for the benefit
of social conditioning fear-mongering
social panic and misinformation aimed
directly at the public by men in power
nearly killed the comics industry
in the more strictly political arena
american leaders of the post-world war
ii era repeatedly told the public that
they should be fearful of subversive
communist influence in their lives
communists could be lurking anywhere
using their positions as school teachers
college professors labor organizers
artists or journalists to aid the
program of world communist domination
this paranoia about the internal
communist threat what we call the red
scare
reached a fever pitch between 1950 and
1954 when senator joseph mccarthy of
wisconsin a right-wing republican
launched a series of highly publicized
probes into alleged communist
penetration of the state department the
white house the treasury
and even the us army his probes also
reached into hollywood during
eisenhower's first two years in office
mccarthy's shrieking denunciations and
fear-mongering created a climate of fear
and suspicion across the country
and no one dared tangle with mccarthy
for fear of being labeled disloyal
those conspiratorial attitudes were kept
alive by the john birch society a
far-right authoritarian political
advocacy group that continues to have an
effect to this day
the birch society was linked to donald
trump prior to and during his presidency
and uses wild baseless conspiracy
theories to perpetuate fear and
hostility toward any social progress
labeling it communist activity
the john birch society is much more
private now but its influence can be
seen in recent years as absurd cries
about communist takeover in the u.s have
once again reached fever pitch
wertham mccarthy and the john birch
society planted destructive seeds that
over the past seven decades have
contributed to the cracking foundations
in u.s social and political landscapes
along with figures such as rush limbaugh
mayhe rest in hell bill o'reilly steve
bannon andy noe tucker carlson alex
jones those ideas have continued
infiltrating the collective
consciousness of conservative voters
they've become so scared of phantom
commies and socialists that they've been
herded into the camp of neo-fascism most
of them don't even realize it and they
will fight tooth and nail against those
labels because they assume their
perspective is the one true objective
default perspective
and they can't recognize that they've
been pushed so far right that they're on
the edge of a cliff
they're abandoning any pretense about
freedom or liberty while still using
those words as rallying cries they think
their views however hostile and
anti-social are a justified reaction to
what they see as an infiltration of
their values what they've been spoon fed
is an anti-american takeover
president biden is regularly called a
socialist by popular conservative
figures which is really really stupid
and causes actual socialists to scoff
and those same delusional sentiments
grow in comics and nerd culture
youtubers like doom geeks and
gamers nerd roddick young ripa that
umbrella guy the quartering and ethan
van skiver they've painted over the same
talking points with fear-mongering about
sjws and wokism destroying the fandoms
that they claim to love much as fascists
in america use the bible and the flag as
their shields
anti-sjws anti-woke ranters and anti-fan
influencers use comics star wars and
anything they can weaponize to create
the exact same panic
among uninformed audiences
modern neo-fascist conservatives don't
know the text nor the meaning of the
constitution or the bill of rights or
even the bible in many cases they aren't
well versed in law or political theory
but they use these concepts as bludgeons
and label anyone who disagrees as
traitorous and anti-american
anti-fandoms similarly seem to rarely
know the history of comics even the
blatant social messaging that has
existed in the medium yet they insist
the media has always been and should
always be apolitical whatever that means
and should not corrupt the audience with
nebulous agendas
the fandom menace and other anti-modern
star trek youtubers try to convince
people that star trek has never had
progressive social messaging
they're the modern reincarnation of
mccarthy and wertham while presenting
themselves as being pro-free speech
it's really difficult to reach people
who operate on that level of cognitive
dissonance
gamergate was the first time these views
were successfully weaponized against
larger fandoms in the social media age
and like their battle cry of ethics in
game journalism glossed over their
misogyny and bigotry and their
harassment campaigns and doxing
anti-fandoms like comics gate and the
phantom menace and others say they just
want good stories or that their alleged
beloved media is being destroyed by woke
political messaging and agendas
but of course as these movements become
more common and their members more
comfortable expressing their true views
and as the victim tallies rise it
becomes clear that these superficial
arguments were just a front
and that the tactic has carried over
into these like-minded movements
regardless whether they fight in the
battlefield of anime or comics or star
trek or star wars the core ideologies
remain the same with many players
transitioning from one group to the next
without any difficulty like mccarthy and
wertham and bannon and carlson these
people operate from a very distorted
notion of reality and of humanity
they use terms like culture war to
describe what they think is an
unnaturally occurring push for more
inclusion and acceptance
they say anything that doesn't center
itself around a white cis hetero male
perspective is identity politics
these terms are thin veils for what
boils down to regressive anti-progress
beliefs and should be a red flag to
anyone who sees them
and if they're not red flags to you
you're either in that feedback loop
or you're privileged enough to be
apathetic
so what is the goal of these anti-fandom
networks
it's to siphon off new and casual fans
those who maybe just became interested
because of the mcu or the broadening
star wars franchise
people like me aren't at much risk of
falling in with these obviously false
narratives but if you're just a kid
searching youtube for content on comics
or trek just trying to get into a new
hobby you're almost certainly more
likely to find anti-fandom content over
genuine fan videos
uninformed excited to engage
impressionable these are the traits that
anti-fandoms prey on their perceived
dominance in the algorithm only possible
because of their low information carbon
copy content they produce at high rates
creates the optics of validity in their
views
a new or casual fan can be sucked in and
on the path to fascism before they
realize there was ever another option
like i said earlier there's no
neutrality in this
the anti-fans call themselves culture
warriors and they seem to think they're
noble heroes in said culture war but
they are in fact an aberration an
astroturf weaponized brainwashed
minority of citizens and fans who
pretend to be the majority simply by
being louder more aggressive and
ignoring facts
many of these figures views line up
exactly with conservative talking points
such as being anti-vaccine anti-data
anti-democracy anti-journalism
anti-lgbtq anti-blm anti-poor and even
against discussing solutions for climate
change no matter their warped reasoning
their cocksure defiance they are
anti-reality anti-fans like conservatism
in general are defined almost
exclusively by what they are against
they offer no real policies or solutions
they move goal posts to suit whatever
they're arguing in a given scenario they
contradict themselves constantly and
they all seem to be fueled by a juvenile
desire to own the left or trigger the
libs which is portrayed as being
pro-freedom
but at its core this phenomenon of
anti-fandom is merely an extension of
the cancerous organism that is modern
fascism it's in every crevice of our
culture including and especially within
fandoms of all kinds
there is no neutral position apathy is
capitulation complacency is surrender
make your choice
but sitting on the fence is a choice for
anti-fandom
for fascism
[Music]
you
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Fighting Back Against Anti-Fandom - Why People FEAR The Fandom Initiative
The Phantom Island of Google Maps
Is George Soros Behind Everything You Don't Like? β SOME MORE NEWS
Gov. Kristi Noem says "I want the truth to be out there" after viral story of killing her dog
Trump Has PANIC ATTACK on Easter About GOING TO JAIL
Bill Maher on humor in politics: "Don't be tribal"