Anti-Fandom and Fascism are the Same Thing

Actual Fandom
12 Nov 202111:26

Summary

TLDRThe video script discusses the historical impact of fear-mongering on American society, highlighting the anti-comic book crusade of the 1950s and the Red Scare's influence on contemporary politics and culture. It connects these historical events to modern anti-fandom movements, which it argues are driven by regressive ideologies and contribute to the spread of misinformation, ultimately urging viewers to be aware and active in opposing such narratives.

Takeaways

  • πŸ“š The 1950s saw a rise in conservative fear-mongering leading to a destructive socio-political phenomenon.
  • 🚫 Dr. Frederick Wertham's crusade against comic books in 1948 and the publication of 'Seduction of the Innocent' in 1954 sparked a moral panic.
  • πŸ“ˆ In response to Wertham's claims, the US Senate held hearings on the harmful effects of comic books, contributing to juvenile delinquency concerns.
  • 🚷 The comic book industry self-censored, creating a code that restricted content, including authority figures' portrayal and the use of certain words like 'horror' or 'terror'.
  • πŸ³οΈβ€πŸŒˆ Sexuality, drug use, seduction, and homosexuality were effectively censored, with only traditional marriage and family values being promoted in comics.
  • πŸ“‰ Over time, these restrictive values faded, and the comic book code was eventually eliminated in 2011, seen as a relic of an era of misinformation and fear-mongering.
  • πŸ” The Red Scare and Joseph McCarthy's anti-communist probes created a climate of fear and suspicion in the US during the post-WWII era.
  • πŸ€₯ The John Birch Society, linked to Donald Trump, continues to propagate baseless conspiracy theories and fear-mongering.
  • 🌐 Modern neo-fascist conservatives and anti-fandoms use fear and misinformation to push regressive ideologies, often under the guise of pro-free speech or anti-political messaging.
  • πŸ’­ The goal of anti-fandom networks is to attract new and casual fans with misinformation, potentially leading them down a path to adopting regressive ideologies.
  • πŸ›‘ There is no neutral position in the culture war; apathy and complacency are seen as indirect support for anti-fandom and fascism.

Q & A

  • What was Frederick Wertham's role in the 1950s comic book censorship?

    -Frederick Wertham was a psychologist who began a crusade against comic books in 1948, claiming they had harmful effects on young readers. His criticisms led to the infamous 1954 publication 'Seduction of the Innocent' and subsequent U.S. Senate hearings on comic books, which resulted in the comic book industry adopting a strict self-censorship code.

  • What were some of the specific restrictions imposed by the comic book industry's self-censorship code?

    -The comic book self-censorship code, implemented in response to Wertham's campaign and Senate hearings, included prohibitions on disrespecting authority figures like police and judges, using words like 'horror' or 'terror', and banning depictions of sexuality outside of traditional marriage, as well as any representation of drug use or homosexuality.

  • How did the 'Red Scare' in the post-World War II era affect American society?

    -During the 'Red Scare', American leaders promoted intense fear of communist infiltration in various aspects of life, including education and media. Senator Joseph McCarthy notably led high-profile probes into alleged communist influences, creating a widespread climate of fear and suspicion across the United States.

  • What role did the John Birch Society play in American politics and how is it connected to modern events?

    -The John Birch Society, a far-right political advocacy group, has historically promoted conspiracy theories about communist influences in America. The society's influence persists, often cited in connection with modern political figures and movements that leverage similar fear-mongering tactics about socialism and social progress.

  • How did anti-fandom movements like ComicsGate and the Phantom Menace use popular culture for their agendas?

    -Movements like ComicsGate and the Phantom Menace have criticized changes in popular media, claiming that inclusion and progressive themes, dubbed as 'wokism', are destroying traditional fandoms. They often use these platforms to propagate broader conservative ideologies, mirroring historical fear-mongering tactics.

  • What impact did the comic book code have on the portrayal of romance and sexuality in comic books?

    -The comic book code severely restricted the portrayal of romance and sexuality. It mandated that any depiction of passion or romantic interest must align with traditional marriage and family values, effectively banning portrayals of unmarried couples showing affection or any non-heteronormative relationships.

  • In what ways did McCarthyism create a climate of fear and suspicion in the U.S.?

    -McCarthyism, led by Senator Joseph McCarthy, was characterized by aggressive investigations and accusations against individuals in government, Hollywood, and other sectors for being communist sympathizers. This created a pervasive climate of fear, where many were afraid to oppose McCarthy or could be blacklisted, often based on unsubstantiated accusations.

  • What are some modern equivalents of the comic book censorship and Red Scare as mentioned in the script?

    -Modern equivalents include movements like anti-SJW and anti-woke groups in fandoms that claim to be fighting against political correctness and inclusion, similar to how comic book censorship sought to regulate content and the Red Scare promoted fear of communism. These contemporary movements often use social media to amplify their messages.

  • What does the term 'culture war' imply in the context of the script?

    -In the script, 'culture war' refers to the ongoing conflicts within society over cultural values and norms, particularly around issues of race, sexuality, and gender. These are often framed by conservative movements as battles against progressive changes, using terminology that suggests a significant and disruptive conflict.

  • How does the phenomenon of anti-fandom contribute to political polarization, according to the script?

    -Anti-fandoms contribute to political polarization by using cultural touchpoints like comics or movies to enforce conservative ideologies and resist progressive themes. They create divisive narratives that align with broader political conflicts, influencing fans and the public's perception of cultural and political issues.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ“š The Historical Context of Fear-mongering and Censorship

This paragraph discusses the socio-political climate of the early 1950s, highlighting the role of conservative fear-mongering in launching destructive phenomena. It delves into the infamous work of psychologist Frederick Wertham, who initiated a baseless crusade against comic books, leading to the publication of 'Seduction of the Innocent' in 1954. This event triggered Senate hearings on the harmful effects of comic books and subsequently, the comic book industry's implementation of a self-censorship code. The code's vague restrictions effectively censored various aspects of comic content, including authority figures' portrayal, use of certain words, and depiction of sexuality or seduction. The paragraph also touches on the broader political context of the Red Scare, led by figures like Senator Joseph McCarthy, and the lasting impact of these events on American society, culture, and politics.

05:01

🎭 The Misguided Fears in Modern Fandom and Politics

The second paragraph examines the continuation of fear-mongering and misinformation in modern times, particularly within conservative circles and nerd culture. It criticizes popular conservative figures and YouTubers who propagate the idea that 'social justice warriors' (SJWs) and 'wokeism' are destroying fandoms, using comics, Star Wars, and other media as tools to incite panic among uninformed audiences. The paragraph highlights the ignorance of these influencers regarding the historical social messaging in comics and their apolitical stance as a cover for regressive ideologies. It also discusses the Gamergate controversy and the transition of these views into other movements like Comics Gate and the Phantom Menace, emphasizing the superficial arguments as a facade for deeper prejudices and the rise of victim tallies as these groups become more comfortable with their true views.

10:02

🚫 The Anti-Fandom Movement and Its Regressive Impact

This paragraph focuses on the anti-fandom movement, describing it as an extension of modern fascism that permeates various cultural aspects, including fandoms. It criticizes the movement's lack of substantial policies or solutions, its contradictory nature, and its fuel from a juvenile desire to provoke and dominate the left. The paragraph also addresses the anti-fandom's narrative of a culture war against inclusion and acceptance, labeling it as a regressive anti-progress belief. It warns against the siphoning of new and casual fans into these regressive ideologies through the dominance of anti-fandom content in online algorithms and the production of low-information content. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing the importance of making a choice against anti-fandom and fascism, as neutrality or apathy inadvertently supports these harmful movements.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Fear-mongering

Fear-mongering refers to the use of fear as a tool to influence people's emotions, attitudes, or behaviors. In the video, it is described as a driving force behind the destructive socio-political phenomenon of the 1950s, where conservative fear-mongering led to the unjust targeting of mediums like comic books and the creation of a climate of fear and suspicion.

πŸ’‘Sedition of the Innocent

Sedition of the Innocent is a book published by Frederic Wertham in 1954 that criticized the content of comic books, claiming they contributed to juvenile delinquency. The book played a significant role in the public hearings on the harmful effects of comic books and the subsequent implementation of a self-censorship code within the comic book industry.

πŸ’‘Self-censorship

Self-censorship is the act of limiting or controlling one's own speech, writing, or other forms of expression to avoid controversy or disapproval. In the context of the video, the comic book industry implemented self-censorship in response to public criticism and government investigation, leading to restrictions on content and the suppression of various themes and ideas.

πŸ’‘Red Scare

The Red Scare refers to the period of intense anti-communist sentiment, paranoia, and political repression in the United States during the Cold War, particularly in the 1950s. It is characterized by a widespread fear of communist infiltration and subversion within American society and institutions. In the video, the Red Scare is depicted as a time when fear-mongering and conspiracy theories about internal communist threats reached a peak.

πŸ’‘John Birch Society

The John Birch Society is a far-right political advocacy group that has historically promoted conservative and libertarian ideas. The society has been linked to baseless conspiracy theories and has been accused of promoting fear and hostility towards social progress. In the video, it is described as having a continuing influence and being associated with recent resurgences of fear-mongering and anti-social progress sentiments.

πŸ’‘Neo-fascism

Neo-fascism is a contemporary form of fascism that embraces the same authoritarian, nationalistic, and often racist ideologies as historical fascism but may manifest in different ways. In the video, it is suggested that certain conservative ideologies and movements, influenced by fear-mongering and conspiracy theories, have led many into the camp of neo-fascism without them realizing it.

πŸ’‘Anti-fandom

Anti-fandom refers to a group of people who actively oppose or criticize a particular fandom or fanbase. In the video, anti-fandoms are described as networks that use fear-mongering and misinformation to siphon off new and casual fans, promoting a distorted view of reality and spreading regressive anti-progress beliefs.

πŸ’‘Cultural War

Cultural War refers to the conflict between different cultural values and beliefs, often used to describe the struggle for dominance in societal norms, values, and politics. In the video, the term is used to highlight how certain groups perceive the push for more inclusion and acceptance as a threat, framing it as an artificially created conflict.

πŸ’‘McCarthyism

McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence. It is named after Senator Joseph McCarthy, who was known for his forceful anti-communist investigations. In the video, McCarthyism is portrayed as a historical example of fear-mongering and conspiracy theories that created a climate of fear and suspicion.

πŸ’‘Astroturf

Astroturf refers to an organized activity or campaign that is designed to give the false impression of being a spontaneous, grassroots movement. In the video, the term is used to describe how certain groups present themselves as representing the majority when they are actually a small, vocal minority.

πŸ’‘Fascism

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian political ideology characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy. In the video, fascism is portrayed as a cancerous organism that has infiltrated various aspects of culture, including fandoms, and is perpetuated by individuals and groups that spread fear, hostility, and regressive beliefs.

Highlights

In the early 1950s, conservative fear-mongering initiated a destructive socio-political phenomenon.

The psychologist Frederick Wertham began a baseless crusade against comic books in 1948.

The publication of 'Seduction of the Innocent' in 1954 led to Senate hearings on the harmful effects of comic books.

The comic book industry responded with a self-censorship code, restricting content on authority figures, sexuality, and more.

The self-censorship code was in place for six decades before being eliminated in 2011.

The Red Scare, fueled by Senator Joseph McCarthy, created a climate of fear and suspicion across America.

The John Birch Society perpetuated conspiracy theories and influenced far-right politics, including during Trump's presidency.

Anti-fandoms and conservative influencers use fear-mongering to push a neo-fascist agenda under the guise of culture war.

These movements claim to be pro-free speech while actually promoting regressive and anti-progress beliefs.

Anti-fandoms target new and casual fans, potentially leading them down a path to fascism.

The anti-fandom phenomenon is an extension of modern fascism, affecting various cultural aspects including fandoms.

Conservatism and anti-fandoms are defined by what they are against, offering no real policies or solutions.

The transcript highlights the insidious nature of anti-fandom networks and their impact on impressionable individuals.

The struggle against anti-fandoms is portrayed as a battle for the soul of culture and society.

The narrative calls for a proactive stance against anti-fandom and fascism, stressing that neutrality is not an option.

The transcript ends with a rallying call to make a choice against anti-fandom and fascism, emphasizing the importance of standing up for values.

Transcripts

00:00

[Music]

00:03

[Applause]

00:04

[Music]

00:13

in the early 1950s a confluence of

00:16

conservative fear-mongering launched a

00:17

destructive socio-political phenomenon

00:20

that crept into the fabric of society

00:22

and thrives today despite evidence

00:24

against the claims despite reason

00:27

and decades of their doom saying being

00:29

shown

00:30

as false

00:33

the now disgraced psychologist frederick

00:35

wertham began his baseless crusade

00:37

against the popular medium of comic

00:38

books in 1948

00:40

in the spring of 1954 the infamous

00:43

seduction of the innocent was published

00:46

shortly after publication of the pearl

00:47

clutching tome the united states senate

00:50

convened hearings on harmful effects of

00:52

comic books as part of its investigation

00:54

into juvenile delinquency

00:56

in response to wertham's high-profile

00:58

criticisms and the senate investigation

01:00

the comic book industry implemented a

01:02

self-censorship code

01:04

these restrictions included not

01:06

portraying authority figures like police

01:08

and judges in a disrespectful manner nor

01:11

could comics use certain words like

01:13

horror or terror

01:15

the rules of the code were generally

01:16

vague with so much room for

01:18

interpretation as to effectively censor

01:20

publishers simply out of fear sexuality

01:23

of nearly any kind drug use even in

01:26

context of anti-drug messages seduction

01:29

or

01:30

sexual perversion which meant

01:32

homosexuality

01:34

all banned

01:35

any depiction of passion or romantic

01:37

interest had to be shown in context of

01:39

traditional marriage and family values

01:42

so unmarried couples couldn't kiss or

01:44

even imply physical interest in one

01:46

another there were many dubious

01:48

oppressive limits placed on comics for

01:51

six decades but as time went on and

01:53

those traditional regressive values slot

01:56

off of society the rules were more and

01:58

more ignored until eventually the code

02:01

was eliminated in 2011.

02:03

it had become a relic of a time when

02:06

white conservative men in power targeted

02:08

low information citizens for the benefit

02:10

of social conditioning fear-mongering

02:13

social panic and misinformation aimed

02:15

directly at the public by men in power

02:18

nearly killed the comics industry

02:20

in the more strictly political arena

02:22

american leaders of the post-world war

02:24

ii era repeatedly told the public that

02:26

they should be fearful of subversive

02:28

communist influence in their lives

02:30

communists could be lurking anywhere

02:32

using their positions as school teachers

02:34

college professors labor organizers

02:36

artists or journalists to aid the

02:38

program of world communist domination

02:41

this paranoia about the internal

02:43

communist threat what we call the red

02:45

scare

02:46

reached a fever pitch between 1950 and

02:49

1954 when senator joseph mccarthy of

02:52

wisconsin a right-wing republican

02:54

launched a series of highly publicized

02:56

probes into alleged communist

02:58

penetration of the state department the

03:00

white house the treasury

03:03

and even the us army his probes also

03:05

reached into hollywood during

03:07

eisenhower's first two years in office

03:09

mccarthy's shrieking denunciations and

03:11

fear-mongering created a climate of fear

03:13

and suspicion across the country

03:16

and no one dared tangle with mccarthy

03:18

for fear of being labeled disloyal

03:21

those conspiratorial attitudes were kept

03:23

alive by the john birch society a

03:25

far-right authoritarian political

03:27

advocacy group that continues to have an

03:29

effect to this day

03:31

the birch society was linked to donald

03:33

trump prior to and during his presidency

03:35

and uses wild baseless conspiracy

03:38

theories to perpetuate fear and

03:39

hostility toward any social progress

03:42

labeling it communist activity

03:45

the john birch society is much more

03:47

private now but its influence can be

03:49

seen in recent years as absurd cries

03:51

about communist takeover in the u.s have

03:54

once again reached fever pitch

03:57

wertham mccarthy and the john birch

03:59

society planted destructive seeds that

04:01

over the past seven decades have

04:03

contributed to the cracking foundations

04:05

in u.s social and political landscapes

04:08

along with figures such as rush limbaugh

04:10

mayhe rest in hell bill o'reilly steve

04:12

bannon andy noe tucker carlson alex

04:15

jones those ideas have continued

04:17

infiltrating the collective

04:19

consciousness of conservative voters

04:21

they've become so scared of phantom

04:23

commies and socialists that they've been

04:25

herded into the camp of neo-fascism most

04:28

of them don't even realize it and they

04:30

will fight tooth and nail against those

04:32

labels because they assume their

04:34

perspective is the one true objective

04:36

default perspective

04:38

and they can't recognize that they've

04:39

been pushed so far right that they're on

04:42

the edge of a cliff

04:44

they're abandoning any pretense about

04:46

freedom or liberty while still using

04:49

those words as rallying cries they think

04:52

their views however hostile and

04:53

anti-social are a justified reaction to

04:56

what they see as an infiltration of

04:58

their values what they've been spoon fed

05:00

is an anti-american takeover

05:04

president biden is regularly called a

05:06

socialist by popular conservative

05:08

figures which is really really stupid

05:10

and causes actual socialists to scoff

05:13

and those same delusional sentiments

05:15

grow in comics and nerd culture

05:17

youtubers like doom geeks and

05:19

gamers nerd roddick young ripa that

05:22

umbrella guy the quartering and ethan

05:24

van skiver they've painted over the same

05:26

talking points with fear-mongering about

05:29

sjws and wokism destroying the fandoms

05:32

that they claim to love much as fascists

05:34

in america use the bible and the flag as

05:36

their shields

05:38

anti-sjws anti-woke ranters and anti-fan

05:41

influencers use comics star wars and

05:44

anything they can weaponize to create

05:46

the exact same panic

05:48

among uninformed audiences

05:50

modern neo-fascist conservatives don't

05:52

know the text nor the meaning of the

05:54

constitution or the bill of rights or

05:56

even the bible in many cases they aren't

05:58

well versed in law or political theory

06:00

but they use these concepts as bludgeons

06:03

and label anyone who disagrees as

06:05

traitorous and anti-american

06:07

anti-fandoms similarly seem to rarely

06:10

know the history of comics even the

06:12

blatant social messaging that has

06:13

existed in the medium yet they insist

06:15

the media has always been and should

06:17

always be apolitical whatever that means

06:20

and should not corrupt the audience with

06:22

nebulous agendas

06:24

the fandom menace and other anti-modern

06:27

star trek youtubers try to convince

06:29

people that star trek has never had

06:31

progressive social messaging

06:35

they're the modern reincarnation of

06:37

mccarthy and wertham while presenting

06:40

themselves as being pro-free speech

06:43

it's really difficult to reach people

06:45

who operate on that level of cognitive

06:47

dissonance

06:50

gamergate was the first time these views

06:52

were successfully weaponized against

06:53

larger fandoms in the social media age

06:56

and like their battle cry of ethics in

06:58

game journalism glossed over their

07:00

misogyny and bigotry and their

07:02

harassment campaigns and doxing

07:04

anti-fandoms like comics gate and the

07:06

phantom menace and others say they just

07:08

want good stories or that their alleged

07:10

beloved media is being destroyed by woke

07:13

political messaging and agendas

07:16

but of course as these movements become

07:17

more common and their members more

07:20

comfortable expressing their true views

07:22

and as the victim tallies rise it

07:24

becomes clear that these superficial

07:26

arguments were just a front

07:28

and that the tactic has carried over

07:31

into these like-minded movements

07:33

regardless whether they fight in the

07:34

battlefield of anime or comics or star

07:36

trek or star wars the core ideologies

07:39

remain the same with many players

07:41

transitioning from one group to the next

07:43

without any difficulty like mccarthy and

07:46

wertham and bannon and carlson these

07:48

people operate from a very distorted

07:50

notion of reality and of humanity

07:54

they use terms like culture war to

07:56

describe what they think is an

07:57

unnaturally occurring push for more

07:59

inclusion and acceptance

08:01

they say anything that doesn't center

08:03

itself around a white cis hetero male

08:05

perspective is identity politics

08:08

these terms are thin veils for what

08:10

boils down to regressive anti-progress

08:12

beliefs and should be a red flag to

08:15

anyone who sees them

08:16

and if they're not red flags to you

08:19

you're either in that feedback loop

08:21

or you're privileged enough to be

08:23

apathetic

08:25

so what is the goal of these anti-fandom

08:27

networks

08:28

it's to siphon off new and casual fans

08:32

those who maybe just became interested

08:34

because of the mcu or the broadening

08:36

star wars franchise

08:38

people like me aren't at much risk of

08:40

falling in with these obviously false

08:42

narratives but if you're just a kid

08:44

searching youtube for content on comics

08:46

or trek just trying to get into a new

08:48

hobby you're almost certainly more

08:50

likely to find anti-fandom content over

08:53

genuine fan videos

08:56

uninformed excited to engage

08:58

impressionable these are the traits that

09:01

anti-fandoms prey on their perceived

09:03

dominance in the algorithm only possible

09:06

because of their low information carbon

09:08

copy content they produce at high rates

09:10

creates the optics of validity in their

09:13

views

09:14

a new or casual fan can be sucked in and

09:17

on the path to fascism before they

09:18

realize there was ever another option

09:23

like i said earlier there's no

09:25

neutrality in this

09:26

the anti-fans call themselves culture

09:28

warriors and they seem to think they're

09:30

noble heroes in said culture war but

09:33

they are in fact an aberration an

09:35

astroturf weaponized brainwashed

09:38

minority of citizens and fans who

09:40

pretend to be the majority simply by

09:42

being louder more aggressive and

09:44

ignoring facts

09:46

many of these figures views line up

09:48

exactly with conservative talking points

09:50

such as being anti-vaccine anti-data

09:53

anti-democracy anti-journalism

09:55

anti-lgbtq anti-blm anti-poor and even

09:59

against discussing solutions for climate

10:01

change no matter their warped reasoning

10:04

their cocksure defiance they are

10:06

anti-reality anti-fans like conservatism

10:09

in general are defined almost

10:10

exclusively by what they are against

10:13

they offer no real policies or solutions

10:16

they move goal posts to suit whatever

10:18

they're arguing in a given scenario they

10:20

contradict themselves constantly and

10:22

they all seem to be fueled by a juvenile

10:24

desire to own the left or trigger the

10:27

libs which is portrayed as being

10:30

pro-freedom

10:32

but at its core this phenomenon of

10:34

anti-fandom is merely an extension of

10:37

the cancerous organism that is modern

10:39

fascism it's in every crevice of our

10:42

culture including and especially within

10:45

fandoms of all kinds

10:49

there is no neutral position apathy is

10:52

capitulation complacency is surrender

10:54

make your choice

10:56

but sitting on the fence is a choice for

10:59

anti-fandom

11:00

for fascism

11:05

[Music]

11:25

you

Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Comic CensorshipSocio-Political ImpactFear MongeringRed ScareMcCarthyismFandom CultureConservative InfluenceCultural WarsSocial ConditioningProgressive Resistance