Judge Steve Harvey Is Still Terrible

Jarvis Johnson! GOLD
3 May 202422:20

Summary

TLDRIn this humorous and insightful video transcript, the discussion revolves around an episode of 'Judge Steve Harvey,' a show where Steve Harvey, not a legal professional, humorously presides over real-life disputes. The case in focus involves a man named Erron suing his ex-fiancee Ilene for the return of $3,400 he spent on three engagement rings. The conversation is peppered with commentary from Jarvis Johnson, Alex, and Olay, who are all lawyers in this fictional setting. They debate the legal and moral implications of the case, with Olay particularly critical of Erron's actions, including his infidelity and the poor quality of the rings. The summary also highlights the comedic elements, such as the reactions of the studio audience and the participants' banter. The video concludes with the participants discussing their podcast and Olay's YouTube channel, where she critically examines political figures.

Takeaways

  • 🎬 The video is a humorous discussion about the TV show 'Judge Steve Harvey', featuring guests Lolo and Olay, who are both lawyers.
  • πŸ˜‚ The participants mock the idea that Steve Harvey, a comedian, is presiding over a court, highlighting the show's entertainment value over legal gravitas.
  • πŸ’ The case discussed involves a man, Erron, suing his ex-fiancee, Ilene, for the cost of three engagement rings, totaling $3,400.
  • πŸ€” The guests express disbelief at Erron's actions, questioning the value and legality of his claims, especially considering his infidelity.
  • πŸ‘Ά Ilene points out that she has multiple children with Erron, emphasizing the personal investment in the relationship beyond material possessions.
  • πŸ“Ώ Discussion ensues about the nature of engagement rings as gifts and whether they should be returned if marriage does not take place.
  • 🚫 Olay passionately argues against the idea of returning the rings, especially given Erron's behavior and the circumstances of their breakup.
  • 🏠 Mention is made of Erron's move to Richmond Heights, which is met with sarcasm due to the context of his lawsuit against Ilene.
  • πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Erron's lack of contrition and his attempt to justify his actions, despite acknowledging his infidelity, is met with criticism.
  • πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ The conversation takes a turn when Ilene admits to pawning the third ring, which adds another layer to the legal and moral questions at hand.
  • πŸ›‘ The final verdict by 'Judge Steve Harvey' is that Erron's suit is dismissed, and he does not receive the $3,400 he sought.

Q & A

  • What is the name of the show where Steve Harvey acts as a judge?

    -The show is not explicitly named in the transcript, but it is implied to be a fictional court show featuring Steve Harvey as the judge.

  • Why did the audience react with shock when Erron mentioned the cost of the engagement rings?

    -The audience reacted with shock because Erron spent a total of $3,400 on three different engagement rings, which is considered inexpensive and led to laughter and criticism from the hosts and the audience.

  • What did Ilene do with the second engagement ring after discovering Erron's infidelity?

    -Ilene, out of anger, took off the second engagement ring and threw it out the window of her car.

  • Why did Erron give Ilene multiple engagement rings?

    -Erron gave Ilene multiple engagement rings in an attempt to propose multiple times, possibly due to dissatisfaction with the previous rings or attempts.

  • What was the reaction of the hosts and the audience when Ilene mentioned she was pregnant a third time with Erron's child?

    -The hosts and the audience were shocked and expressed disbelief, questioning why Ilene would continue to have children with Erron given his behavior.

  • What was the final verdict of the fictional court case regarding the engagement rings?

    -The final verdict, as given by Steve Harvey acting as the judge, was to dismiss Erron's suit for $3,400, meaning he did not get the money back for the engagement rings.

  • Why did the hosts and the audience express sympathy towards Ilene?

    -The hosts and the audience expressed sympathy towards Ilene because she had been given multiple inexpensive and ill-fitting engagement rings by Erron, who also exhibited unfaithful behavior.

  • What was the reaction of the hosts when Ilene mentioned she still had a good feeling about her relationship with Erron?

    -The hosts were surprised and confused, with one even suggesting that if Ilene was going to continue with Erron, then the support they had rallied for her was misguided.

  • What was the context of the discussion about the law in Ohio regarding engagement rings?

    -The discussion about the law in Ohio was in reference to whether Erron was entitled to the return of the engagement rings' value since the marriage did not occur. The law states that gifts given in contemplation of marriage should be returned if no wedding takes place.

  • What was the general sentiment towards Erron's actions throughout the court session?

    -The general sentiment towards Erron's actions was negative, with the hosts and the audience criticizing his behavior, including his infidelity and attempts to reclaim the value of the engagement rings.

  • Why did the hosts suggest that the system worked in the end?

    -The hosts suggested that the system worked because Erron's suit was dismissed, indicating that the outcome was just and that Ilene did not have to return the money for the engagement rings.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ˜€ Introduction to the Show and Guests

The video begins with host Jarvis Johnson welcoming viewers to the premium channel, which is free, and introduces the topic of the day: a legal case presented by Steve Harvey. Two special guests, Lolo and Olay, who are both lawyers and known for their podcast and YouTube presence, join the show. They discuss their familiarity with Steve Harvey as a comedian and the concept of judges not knowing the law, with a humorous tone. The segment ends with a teaser for a video on Steve Harvey's YouTube channel where he talks about being a judge.

05:00

πŸ˜† The Case of the Engagement Rings

The case revolves around Erron suing his ex-fiancee Ilene for $3,400, the cost of three engagement rings. The discussion is filled with humor and disbelief as the hosts and guests react to the plaintiff's claim. They debate the value of the rings and the concept of a gift once given. The conversation also touches on the narrative power in a courtroom and the importance of storytelling in legal cases. Erron's behavior, including his lack of understanding of marriage and his actions during the relationship, are critiqued, leading to a collective negative perception of his character.

10:02

πŸ˜’ The Absurdity of Erron's Claims

The conversation continues with Erron's argument that if Ilene had cooked dinner, he wouldn't have been out with someone else. This claim is met with incredulity and laughter. The discussion then turns to the specifics of the rings, with Erron's lack of effort in choosing and sizing them becoming a point of mockery. Ilene's actions, such as throwing the second ring out the window, are justified by the hosts. The segment ends with the revelation that Ilene was pregnant a third time and Erron's continued infidelity, leading to strong reactions from the hosts.

15:03

😑 The Verdict and Aftermath

The hosts and guests discuss the legal and moral implications of the case. They touch upon an Ohio law concerning the return of engagement rings if marriage does not occur. Despite Erron's claims of entitlement to the rings, the hosts express their disapproval of his behavior throughout the relationship. The segment concludes with a verdict dismissing Erron's suit for $3,400, and a discussion about the future of Ilene and Erron's relationship. Ilene expresses a surprisingly positive outlook, which leaves the hosts in disbelief.

20:04

πŸ˜… Final Thoughts and Promotions

The video ends with the hosts reflecting on the case and the absurdity of the situation. They also discuss the nature of the show 'Judge Steve Harvey' and the non-legal context of the disputes being settled. The guests, Lolo and Olay, promote their podcast and Olay's YouTube channel, encouraging viewers to watch her recent videos. There's a light-hearted exchange about the number of likes on Jarvis Johnson's channel, and the episode wraps up with a sense of camaraderie and humor.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘Judge Steve Harvey

Judge Steve Harvey is a television personality and comedian who hosts a show where he humorously presides over mock trials. In the script, he is depicted as someone who doesn't strictly adhere to the law but rather uses common sense to make judgments, which is a central theme of the video and a source of humor.

πŸ’‘Engagement Rings

Engagement rings are a symbol of commitment in a relationship, typically presented by one partner to another with the intention of marriage. In the video, the topic of engagement rings becomes a point of contention as the plaintiff, Erron, sues for the return of three rings he purchased for his ex-fiancee, Ilene, which is a key plot element.

πŸ’‘Infidelity

Infidelity refers to being unfaithful or disloyal, especially in a marriage or romantic relationship. In the script, Erron's infidelity is a significant factor that led to the breakdown of his relationship with Ilene and is a major point of discussion and criticism among the characters.

πŸ’‘Mock Trial

A mock trial is a simulated or imitation trial conducted for educational or entertainment purposes. The video revolves around a mock trial where the dispute over engagement rings is humorously adjudicated by Steve Harvey, highlighting the show's format and the characters' interactions.

πŸ’‘Law of Engagement Rings

While not an actual legal principle, the 'law of engagement rings' is a humorous concept discussed in the video, referring to the social and legal implications of giving and receiving engagement rings. It is brought up when discussing whether Ilene should return the rings to Erron after their relationship ended.

πŸ’‘Pawning

Pawning is the act of leaving an item with a pawnbroker to borrow money against its value. Ilene mentions that she pawned one of the engagement rings, which is a pivotal moment in the story as it shows her desperation and the low value she places on the rings given by Erron.

πŸ’‘Commitment

Commitment refers to the state or quality of being dedicated to a cause, activity, or another person. In the context of the video, commitment is a recurring theme, particularly as Erron's lack of commitment to Ilene and their relationship is a point of contention and humor.

πŸ’‘Gift in Contemplation of Marriage

This legal concept refers to a gift given with the understanding that it is conditional upon the occurrence of marriage. In the video, this concept is mentioned in relation to Ohio law, which Steve Harvey humorously discusses while ruling on the case of the engagement rings.

πŸ’‘

πŸ’‘Dispute Resolution

Dispute resolution is the process of resolving disagreements between parties. In the video, the dispute over engagement rings is resolved through the unconventional and humorous method of a mock trial presided over by Steve Harvey, which is portrayed as an alternative forum for dispute resolution.

πŸ’‘Clerks

Clerks, in a legal context, are legal assistants who do much of the research and paperwork for judges. In the script, there is a humorous assertion that 'judges don't know the law' and that 'their clerks do all the work,' which is a playful critique of the legal system and a setup for comedy.

πŸ’‘Narrative

A narrative is a story or account of events, which is often used in legal contexts to present a case. In the video, the importance of narrative is emphasized, with the characters discussing how the way a story is told can influence the outcome of a case, which is central to the mock trial's proceedings.

Highlights

Jarvis Johnson's show features a humorous take on legal disputes with a mock court setting.

Guests Lolo and Olay, both lawyers, provide expert commentary on the legal and moral aspects of the case.

Steve Harvey, known for his comedy and talk show hosting, plays the role of a judge in a fictional courtroom.

The case revolves around a man, Erron, suing his ex-fiancee Ilene for the cost of three engagement rings.

Erron's claim for $3,400 is met with disbelief and laughter due to the nature of the case.

Ilene argues that the rings were gifts and she is not obligated to return them since they did not marry.

The show humorously explores the concept of judges not necessarily knowing the law, with clerks doing the work.

Alex and Olay discuss the importance of storytelling in a court case and how it can sway a jury's decision.

Harvey's character humorously admits to not having a law degree and relying on common sense.

Erron's multiple engagements and the story behind them become a point of mockery and disbelief.

Ilene's discovery of Erron's infidelity through social media adds a dramatic twist to the case.

The audience reacts strongly to Erron's claim, showing a clear lack of support for his suit.

Olay and Alex express their moral outrage and disbelief at Erron's actions and his attempt to sue for the rings.

The show satirically examines the role of material gifts in relationships and the legal implications of broken engagements.

Steve Harvey's verdict, influenced by the mock court's atmosphere, dismisses Erron's suit, to audience approval.

The show concludes with a reminder that Steve Harvey's judgments are for entertainment and not legally binding.

Lolo and Olay promote their podcast and Olay's YouTube channel, encouraging viewers to follow for more content.

Transcripts

00:00

Hello and welcome back

00:01

to Jarvis Johnson! GOLD,

00:03

- [disembodied voice] Gooooooold! - The premium channel that is free.

00:05

Um. It is. It is free.

00:07

But, if you're watching this, you're premium.

00:10

And today court is in session.

00:13

We're joined by two very special guests,

00:16

Lolo and Olay,

00:18

the stars of their own podcast together

00:21

and also YouTube stage and screen.

00:23

Now Alex, you have been a...

00:25

been a part of the

00:26

"I forced a lawyer to watch Steve Harvey" series before,

00:29

- Very famously, very

00:31

- [Jarvis] Very famously you are the only part of it.

00:33

- [Alex] Yes. [laughter]

00:34

- [Jarvis] But Olay, you are now joining us,

00:36

do you know anything about Judge Steve Harvey?

00:37

- No, I don't know about him as a judge,

00:39

I know about Steve Harvey as Steve Harvey,

00:40

so I'm expecting him not to mess around.

00:43

[laughter] - [Jarvis] Okay, okay.

00:44

There is a video on their YouTube channel,

00:46

that I think will be a great primer

00:47

for those who are brand new to this series,

00:50

where Steve Harvey talks about being a judge.

00:52

[Music] - It's really cool to be a judge

00:54

in my position because

00:55

I really don't have to pay attention to the law.

00:58

- [Alex] (scoffs) That's the first thing he says.

00:59

- [Jarvis] That he doesn't have to pay attention to the law.

01:02

Isn't that the only thing he has to pay attention to?

01:04

- [Alex] Actually- Yeah. - Judges don't know the law.

01:05

- [Jarvis] Ohhhh. - [Olay] Real life judges do not know the law.

01:07

- This is actually maybe the most accurate

01:09

thing he's ever said. - [Olay] As in they don't know the law.

01:10

- Their clerks do all the work.

01:12

Shoutout clerks.

01:13

- [Jarvis] I forgot to mention, uh,

01:15

you were both lawyers.

01:17

- [Olay] Oh yes. - [Alex] Oh yeah.

01:19

[laughter] - [Jarvis] Which is kind of the whole

01:20

premise of this video.

01:22

- [Alex] I forgot. - [Jarvis] So you saw it in the title.

01:23

Okay, let's continue.

01:24

- I've been in enough legal trouble. (laughs)

01:27

[laughter]

01:29

Now listening to the story is more important than anything,

01:31

it's not the case, it's the story.

01:32

- [Jarvis] Alright, lawyer check.

01:34

Is it more about the story than the case?

01:37

- [Olay] Mhm. - The story is the case.

01:38

- Yeah, the story is the case, but how you-

01:40

think about if you were gonna go to trial on something,

01:42

it's the same case, technically, the same facts,

01:44

but it depends on what story, what narrative you're telling,

01:47

- [Jarvis] Right. - [Olay] like how have you-

01:47

- [Jarvis] Cause you've got two sides trying to tell a story,

01:50

and then the jury is- - [Olay] And the story teller,

01:51

they, yeah, the best storyteller wins.

01:52

- But sometimes, you're-

01:53

you don't have good facts for your story.

01:56

- I'm- I'm a great storyteller.

01:58

- [Alex] Yeah, I believe that.

01:59

- [Olay] I be getting some shit off,

02:00

like, I have definitely had like arraignments where,

02:03

like, on the facts, you just know your client is going in,

02:05

like, you've already prepared them,

02:06

like, you know, just so you know,

02:08

you're going in. [laughter]

02:10

And then you get up there, and you're like-

02:12

and it works, I'm like,

02:13

Oh shit, there's been a bunch of times

02:15

I've been like this to my client,

02:15

(whispering) Let's fucking go.

02:16

- [Jarvis] You're like dapping up. - [Olay] 100%.

02:19

Like I have actually done that.

02:20

- [Harvey] It's a big world out there,

02:22

and it's filled with people that just don't see eye to eye.

02:25

See that's where I come in.

02:26

- Not him walking around like he's Dark Wing Duck.

02:29

[laughter]

02:30

- [Jarvis] Oh, I love this so much.

02:32

- [Olay] The drip is immaculate.

02:33

- [Jarvis] It is incredible.

02:35

He looks amazing.

02:36

- I am the person they were thinking of when they think

02:38

that you can like, dress your way out of a bad situation, like,

02:40

it don't matter what they tell me about Steve Harvey present day,

02:43

he be dressing down, okay! [laughter]

02:45

- [Jarvis] I can't aspire to any aspect of Steve Harvey's life,

02:48

maybe except for the wealth and fashion.

02:50

- And the mustache is perfectly, - And his wife is a baddie.

02:53

- perfectly managed.

02:54

- [Jarvis] Yeah, I don't think I'll ever get there, but,

02:56

I think you can- you can maybe

02:57

- [Alex] You could do it, you need product, - [Jarvis] I'm trying.

02:59

- [Alex] you need product. - Okay, I'm gonna work on it.

03:01

- [Harvey] See I ain't got a law degree,

03:03

and I'm way too fly to wear a robe,

03:05

but this is where common sense presides.

03:08

In my house.

03:10

Court is now in session.

03:12

- If Olay had her own court show,

03:14

it would be the exact same intro.

03:15

- [Olay] I'm not gonna hold you,

03:16

I've got a black court fit

03:17

that I can find a picture of it later to show you,

03:19

that's like, the poor man's version of this exact outfit he has on.

03:22

- [Jarvis] I just love when he says:

03:23

"I ain't got a law degree, and I'm way too fly to wear a robe."

03:26

- And I felt him.

03:27

- You don't need a law degree, king.

03:28

So let's jump into our case for today.

03:30

- [Narrator] Erron is suing his ex-fiancee Ilene

03:32

for $3,400, the cost of multiple engagement rings.

03:37

- $3,400 for three different engagement rings?

03:41

That means divide that.

03:43

How much he spent on each ring.

03:45

And then you have the nerve to come back here like a pauper

03:48

and ask her for the money?

03:50

For the peasant's rings you bought her?

03:51

[laughter]

03:53

- Straight classist. - Eugh.

03:55

- He was just doing his best. - No.

03:57

- [Jarvis] He was doing his best with each ring.

03:59

Each successive ring, he was like-

04:00

he started with a $400 ring,

04:02

and she was like, "no, more!"

04:04

and then he had a $1000 ring, - [Olay] I, I feel the emotion,

04:06

like I can feel we about to hear a story about a man

04:09

who was doing mess in between each of them engagements.

04:13

[laughter] [Olay] She's ready for- look at her!

04:14

- [Jarvis] She knows she's- - [Olay] Like I know he fucking lying,

04:16

Like, oh, this about to be a nice day,

04:17

I got receipts.

04:18

- Judge Harvey, I'm here to sue my ex-fiance for $3400

04:23

for three engagement rings that I purchased for her.

04:26

[Crowd gasps]

04:27

[laughter]

04:29

- Thank you, same energy!

04:30

That's a man, the man- - [Alex] He's like, three???

04:32

- [Olay] black man, the black man was like,

04:34

come on, bro.

04:34

- [Jarvis] The people are-

04:35

they- they have to have been told to over emote,

04:38

because if you look in the background, everybody's like,

04:40

[Jarvis silently imitating shock]

04:42

- I have nothing really to show for the relationship

04:44

but my children, and uh,

04:46

- [Olay] But my children?! - [Jarvis] (laughing) what???

04:47

- [Olay] Pause, pause, I know you fucking-

04:49

imagine you try to sue a woman who has children for you

04:53

for the $3400.

04:54

- [Jarvis] That's crazy.

04:55

- Multiple children! - [Alex] Litigious-

04:56

litigious king.

04:58

Am I gonna have to take his side in this?

05:00

- [Jarvis] I mean maybe. - [Olay] Clearly, you want to do that.

05:01

- [Alex] Why am I slipping into a Trump voice?

05:03

- [Jarvis] Am I- [laughter]

05:05

- Wanna do it? Yes.

05:06

Be his- be his- be his attorney.

05:07

- (imitating Trump) $3400-

05:10

[Jarvis laughing] a very nice price for a ring.

05:12

- Um, I have nothing really to show for the relationship

05:15

but my children, and uh, I feel like I deserve that money back.

05:19

- Literally no one in the, like, crowd,

05:23

is on his side at all.

05:25

(laughs) He's lost, dude.

05:26

- [Olay] This is absurd. - [Alex] Instantly.

05:27

- He did give me three engagement rings,

05:29

but he proposed, and once you give me an engagement ring,

05:31

it's now my property, and it is a gift.

05:33

We did not get married, so I don't believe I owe him anything.

05:36

- I mean, she is right, no, I mean legally it is a gift.

05:40

- [Jarvis] Yeah. - [Olay] That is like a whole like,

05:40

law of engagement rings.

05:41

I want you to know,

05:42

losers have done this before.

05:44

In real life, have gone to court, - [Jarvis] Mmm, that's crazy.

05:45

- [Olay] and the court has actually had to like,

05:47

decide on this. It's a gift.

05:48

- [Erron] We spent a lot of time together at work,

05:50

I saw her coming and going,

05:52

smelling, good, looking good.

05:54

- [Jarvis] Alright. - Oh he's still pressed.

05:56

- [Jarvis] Yeah, alright buddy. - [Olay] Sad. Embarrassing.

05:58

- [Jarvis] What's his name?

05:58

- [Alex] Erron? - [Jarvis] Erron.

05:59

- (snickering) - Erron.

06:02

- [Harvey] So how is this relationship in the beginning.

06:04

- It was really good.

06:05

Erron was older, he was funny, he was handsome,

06:08

he is handsome. [crowd laughs]

06:10

Um, I'm a bigger girl,

06:11

so I've been like, a little shy, and Erron came to me.

06:14

I thought it was God-sent.

06:15

- [Jarvis] We have to talk about the three engagements.

06:18

I'm just- - [Olay] I was like,

06:19

no one gonna talk about the price of these rings?

06:23

- (laughs) - [Olay] Cause like, first and foremost,

06:24

there's no way that I'm letting no man that

06:26

I already have a child forβ€”

06:27

think about how much it costs to- to birth some children.

06:29

Think about the bill. - [Jarvis] A lot.

06:31

- The bill, is like ten- it's like debt-level money

06:34

to have a child. - [Alex] Yeah.

06:35

- [Olay] And he said children. - Go America!

06:37

- [Olay] Plural! - [Jarvis] I know.

06:38

- [Olay] Imagine that man coming to you like,

06:40

I'm gonna need them-

06:41

them rings that cost me like $1000 a piece.

06:43

- [Jarvis] Yeah, that's crazy.

06:44

- Yeah, don't make me beat yo ass,

06:46

- (laughs) - [Olay] Like I ain't even-

06:46

she should have- she should have tossed them rings at his head.

06:49

- [Erron] We decided that we wanted to

06:50

take it to the next level,

06:52

you know, because, uh, Ilene got pregnant,

06:55

and we wanted to do it the right way.

06:56

- [Jarvis] Why did he say it like it was her fault?

06:58

(laughs) - [Olay] Right, right.

06:59

- Ilene got pregnant, you know how Ilene is.

07:02

[laughter]

07:03

- Maybe he just doesn't know how that works.

07:05

That's my defense.

07:06

He doesn't know how pregnancy works.

07:08

- Alex, excuse me judge,

07:10

but have you considered

07:11

that my client doesn't know what you know.

07:14

- So I went out and bought the first ring.

07:15

- [Harvey] Uh-huh. - [Erron] Um.

07:16

- [Harvey] We got a picture of this ring?

07:18

- [Erron] Uh, it was le-

07:19

- [Olay] What- his motherfucking ring don't even fit,

07:21

don't piss me off, I'm sorry.

07:23

Don't make me mad.

07:24

She should beat his fucking ass.

07:26

[laughter]

07:27

He didn't even fucking check

07:28

the measurement. - The measurement!

07:29

- He didn't even buy this.

07:31

He took this from his sister.

07:32

- [Jarvis] Is it three because he-

07:33

that's how long it took him to get one that fit?

07:35

- I think so, Jarvis. - [Jarvis] Oh, no. Oh Erron.

07:37

- [Alex] That's like- it looks like it could fit on her pinky.

07:40

- This your client?

07:42

(laughs) ahhh.

07:43

- [Jarvis] you gotta find out the ring size.

07:45

- A little.. lotion on there.

07:49

and it will slide right on. - Why would I lotion my hand

07:50

for this ring that don't fit.

07:51

- [Jarvis] Lotion, and then she cuts off the circulation to her finger,

07:54

and then goodbye ring finger.

07:55

- [Harvey] You didn't get the right size?

07:56

- [Ilene] No- (laughs) [crowd laughing]

07:58

- Did you have to wear it like that the whole time?

08:00

- Not the whole time.

08:02

- What happened to that first ring?

08:03

- I simply lost the first ring.

08:05

I think I dropped it in a drain.

08:07

- [Olay] of course it dropped!

08:08

He have some nerve to look at her like that,

08:10

the ring don't fit! - [Jarvis] it doesn't fit.

08:11

- [Olay] Of course it slipped o-

08:12

look at how he looking at her!

08:13

Like he wanted her to cherish this bullshit ring.

08:15

- I'd like to hear more about what Erron has to say.

08:18

- So the second ring, we were at dinner,

08:20

and he just got down on one knee and proposed.

08:22

It was a surprise.

08:23

He was doing really good, I had- I had no idea.

08:25

- [Harvey] Now, you have one child right now.

08:27

- No, we have our second child for the second ring.

08:30

- That- okay hold on.

08:32

[laughter]

08:33

Did he know what marriage is?

08:36

Does he think it's for children?

08:37

- [Olay] He thi- (giggles) yes.

08:38

- [Jarvis] Every child you get a ring? - Every time you get a child,

08:40

you get a new ring.

08:41

- [Jarvis] It's like Thanos or whatever.

08:43

- Yeah, after the stork brings the child,

08:45

- [Jarvis] Right, you get a ring. - You get a ring.

08:47

- [Ilene] Then, his behavior changed.

08:48

He started coming home at different hours,

08:51

it would get later and later,

08:52

and then eventually he stopped coming home.

08:55

- [Jarvis] Woah. - [Alex] Hmmmm.

08:56

Audience reaction. - [Olay] Look at-

08:57

[Audience oooh-ing] - [Ilene] Um.

08:59

- [Erron] Well that is not 100% accurate.

09:03

- [Jarvis] It sounds like it's 90%,

09:04

at least accurate 95% accurate.

09:07

- Which is not 100%. - [Jarvis] Right.

09:08

- And again, he's alive and with us. - [Jarvis] Mhm.

09:11

So she's done him a service already.

09:13

- Let's go to you, Ilene.

09:15

- [Ilene] Okay, alright.

09:16

- [Harvey] What's happening with these nights out?

09:19

- [Ilene] Obviously, he was talking to somebody.

09:22

- [Jarvis] And he's suing her??

09:23

- (whispers) The audacity.

09:24

- [Jarvis] That's crazy.

09:25

- If men don't have nothing else, they have some nerve.

09:27

[Jarvis and Alex laugh]

09:28

- [Harvey] And it ain't going good for you.

09:32

- [Erron] Had dinner been cooked at home,

09:35

during those moments, when I-

09:37

- [Jarvis] Oh. Alright. You've lost me, man.

09:40

- This is getting so bad.

09:41

- This your mans?

09:42

- Okay, he's not my mans!

09:44

[Jarvis and Olay laughing]

09:45

- This is your friend.

09:46

- Excuse me!

09:47

- You know what- you know it's bad when the lawyer

09:48

wants to create distance, like,

09:50

oh my god, I don't like my client as well. - Hey hey hey, I don't like this guy!

09:54

[laughter] - I don't even know his name!

09:55

- There's been a breakdown of communications with my client.

09:59

[laughter]

10:00

Irreconcilable differences.

10:02

- [Jarvis] It's wild cause uh,

10:03

his argument is, "well, if she cooked dinner,

10:06

I wouldn't have spent the nigh somewhere else with someone-"

10:09

oh, so he's trying to say that like,

10:11

well, someone else was taking care of me cause she wouldn't.

10:13

She was too busy taking care

10:14

of the child. - My children!

10:15

- [Jarvis] yeah. (laughs) Like what? - [Alex] Oh my god.

10:17

- [Erron] I gotta eat! - Okay.

10:18

- This is- this is the thing.

10:22

- And- ho ho hold- let me say this.

10:24

You ain't got no friends back there. [crowd laughing]

10:28

- [Jarvis] (laughing) This is a kangaroo court.

10:29

- [Alex] Woo! We hate this guy! [Olay laughing]

10:31

- [Jarvis] He sucks!

10:32

- That is- there's some men, a couple of men in here,

10:35

the young ones, that don't really no nothing,

10:38

you know, he was hungry.

10:40

- [Jarvis] 'Okay!" somebody in the background.

10:42

- [crown member] Okay!

10:42

- There are a couple of men who don't know nothing,

10:44

but everybody else in here knows you ain't shit, so.

10:46

- [Harvey] We have the second ring.

10:48

Oh that's- woo. How much was this ring?

10:51

- [Erron] $800.

10:51

- [Jarvis] Eight hundred?

10:54

- I don't care how big his- I'd beat this man ass, like.

10:55

- [Jarvis] I'm concerned that they took the picture

10:57

in the box and not on the finger,

11:00

so I'm like, did he make

11:01

the mistake again. - Another one.

11:02

- It looks like the same ugly-ass ring from before.

11:05

- [Jarvis] What do you think Alex?

11:06

I don't know this man.

11:07

[laughter]

11:09

- It's a beautiful thing to surprise the ones you love

11:13

with a gift of a diamond.

11:15

- You believe it's a diamond?

11:16

- No, there's no way. [laughter]

11:19

- [Harvey] So now, what happened to this ring?

11:20

- [Ilene] I had befriended the person on instagram

11:24

who he was talking to.

11:25

- Oh, so she know definitively.

11:28

Oh my god. - [Jarvis] Oh my goodness.

11:29

- Wait, this- (sighs)

11:32

- You gotta sit down, what am I gonna say for him?

11:34

- [Alex] I don't know.

11:34

What were they talking about? [laughter]

11:38

- [Jarvis] They were just discussing their stock portfolios.

11:40

- [Ilene] She had pictures of- of them being out on the city.

11:43

- [Jarvis] Oh wow. [crowd laughing]

11:45

- Steve is leaving.

11:47

- [Ilene] (laughs) [crowd laughing[

11:52

- He came off the bench to comfort him?

11:54

- [Ilene] Out of anger, I took it off my finger,

11:56

and I let the window down, and I threw it out the window.

11:58

- So she did throw it out the window.

12:00

- [Jarvis] Yeah, I do think though that-

12:01

- As she should. - [Jarvis] There's a certain price

12:02

or ring where you even

12:04

in anger wouldn't throw it out the window?

12:06

And so it's kind of on him.

12:07

- Threw the second one out the window.

12:08

- [Ilene] Yes, he was there to witness that.

12:10

- [Harvey] No, where in Cleveland did you

12:11

throw this ring out the window.

12:14

- [Ilene] Were were around, around

12:15

55th and St. Claire's, all the shinies. - [Harvey] Oh, you're over, you're over.

12:19

I know good and well you can't get them ring back.

12:20

- [Ilene] we did, we did.

12:21

- No we did not!

12:22

- [Olay] Not him saying that like he has a claim-

12:26

Right, we didn't get it back!

12:27

- We did not!

12:29

- [Jarvis] (laughs)

12:30

Yeah, did they go looking for it?

12:31

I guess.

12:32

- [Harvey] What's happening with the relationship at this point?

12:34

- Obviously, I'm in love with him, he's

12:37

- Why?? - What- don't piss me off.

12:38

- Oh, shit wait, shit- [Jarvis chuckles]

12:39

- Don't make me leave my client.

12:40

- [Jarvis] (laughs) - Sorry, that was an outburst.