'Threatening the president is a crime': Weissmann on why Trump may have violated his bail conditions
Summary
TLDR视频脚本讨论了美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普在社交媒体上的行为,特别是他对法官及其家庭成员的提及。讨论中提到,这种行为可能对即将到来的审判产生影响,并质疑特朗普是否试图影响法官的裁决。同时,强调了法官和检察官应对此类攻击发声,保护法治的重要性。还提到了对潜在陪审团成员的影响,以及可能需要采取的措施来确保司法程序的公正性和完整性。
Please replace the link and try again.
Please replace the link and try again.
Outlines
Please replace the link and try again.
Mindmap
Please replace the link and try again.
Keywords
Please replace the link and try again.
Highlights
法院系统无法有效运作,存在暴政现象。
特朗普在社交媒体上再次发布关于法官女儿的信息。
特朗普可能试图通过某些行为为法官的回避提供弹药。
法官和检察官应该对特朗普的攻击发声。
联邦法官公开发声是对法治受到严重威胁的信号。
曼哈顿地区检察官要求澄清或确认禁言令是否适用于法院成员。
特朗普团队反对任何禁言令的扩大。
特朗普的所谓禁言令并未涵盖法官或法官家庭成员。
在保释期间不得犯罪是纽约、华盛顿特区和乔治亚州的标准条件。
特朗普发布的内容可能构成对美国总统的威胁。
法官有权召开听证会,以确定特朗普发布图片的意图。
潜在陪审团成员可能因特朗普的行为感到受威胁和恐吓。
法官考虑的不仅是个人和家庭安全,还有维护法治。
为保护案件相关人员身份,采取了前所未有的措施。
领导者诋毁个人,可能煽动支持者攻击目标,而自己保持表面上的合理否认。
特朗普可能已经越过了合理否认的界限。
特朗普重复的行为表明他知道人们会如何反应。
法官可以传唤前总统,让他解释自己的行为和意图。
Transcripts
WE DO NOT HAVE A VIABLE COURT
SYSTEM THAT IS ABLE TO FUNCTION
EFFICIENTLY WE HAVE TYRANNY.
>> JOINT IS A FORMER GENERAL
COUNSEL AT THE FBI AND A LEGAL
ANALYST.
THE COHOST OF THE TERRIFIC
MSNBC PODCAST RESCUED IN DONALD
TRUMP.
JUST LAST NIGHT TRUMP POSTED
ONCE AGAIN ON SOCIAL MEDIA
ABOUT THE JUDGES DAUGHTER.
POSTING THIS TIME A LINK TO AN
ARTICLE THAT PROMINENTLY
FEATURED A PHOTO OF HER.
THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES.
HE IS ON THE EVE OF HIS FIRST
CRIMINAL TRIAL.
DO YOU THINK HE IS TRYING TO
GET HIM INTO DOING SOMETHING
THAT HE COULD USE AS AMMUNITION
FOR RECUSAL?
>> I DO NOT THINK THERE IS ANY
BASIS ON THE RECUSAL FRONT.
YOU DO NOT GET TO GO TO
SOMEBODY INTO RECUSAL. YOU COULD INTO REQUIRING THAT
YOU COULD INTO REQUIRING THAT
YOU HAVE TIGHTER RESTRICTIONS
UP TO AND INCLUDING BE REMANDED
TO GO TO JAIL, BUT I DO NOT
THINK THAT HE WOULD BE ABLE TO
CLAIM LATER THAT THERE SHOULD
BE A RECUSAL BECAUSE THE JUDGE
RESPONDED TO THE LITANY OF THINGS THAT YOU JUST SAID.
THINGS THAT YOU JUST SAID.
I ACTUALLY THINK IT IS ABOUT
TIME THAT YOU HAVE JUDGES
SPEAKING OUT.
AS YOU KNOW, I THINK THE WAY TO
LOOK AT THIS IS YOU SEE THE
ATTACKS ON THE MEDIA AND THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
YOU NOW OF COURSE SEE ATTACKS
ON THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM BECAUSE
THAT IS WHAT IS HOLDING DONALD
TRUMP AND BEGINNING TO HOLD HIM
TO ACCOUNT CIVILLY AND
CRIMINALLY, SO OF COURSE HE IS
LASHING OUT IN THE SAME WAY HE
HAS AGAINST ALL OF THOSE OTHER
FORCES WHETHER IT IS THE MEDIA
OR NO JUDGES, AND I THINK THEY
HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO SPEAK OUT.
I THINK PROSECUTORS ACTUALLY UP
TO INCLUDING ATTORNEY GENERAL
GARLAND SHOULD BE SPEAKING OUT
ABOUT THIS.
I DO NOT THINK THIS IS NORMAL
TIMES WERE YOU SAY I WILL JUST
SPEAK IN COURT.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT NOT TO
HAVE UNILATERAL DISARMAMENT AND
FOR THEM TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS
GOING ON AND JUST HOW UNUSUAL
THIS IS.
WE BOTH KNOW TO HAVE A FEDERAL
JUDGE ARE GOING ON THE AIRWAYS
IS A SIGNAL OF JUST HOW SEVERE
THIS THREAD IS TO THE RULE OF LAW.
LAW.
>> THE MANHATTAN DA HAS ASKED
IN A PROMOTION LETTER FOR THE
JUDGE TO CLARIFY OR CONFIRM
THAT THE GAG ORDER APPLIES TO
FILM THE MEMBERS OF THE COURT.
THE TRUMP TEAM HAS RESPONDED
WITH AN OBJECTION TO ANY
EXPANSION.
EXPLAINED FOR THE VIEWERS WITH
THE DA IS ASKING FOR HERE.
THERE IS SOME SPECIFICITY IN
THAT GAG ORDER THAT WAS ENTERED
THURSDAY, BUT DO YOU THINK IS
THE LANGUAGE IS CURRENTLY
INCLUDED IN THIS ORDER THAT IT
WOULD NECESSARILY INCLUDE
SOMEBODY LIKE THE JUDGES FAMILY
MEMBERS?
>> I THINK THERE ARE TWO
ISSUES FOR WEATHER DONALD TRUMP
HAS SANCTIONS THAT COULD BE
IMPOSED RIGHT NOW.
ONE ISSUE IS WHETHER HIS
CONFLICT IS COVERED BY THE
CONDITIONS SENT BY HIM AND HIS
SO-CALLED GAG ORDER.
I THINK THERE IS NO QUESTION
THAT IT'S NOT BROAD ENOUGH TO
COVER THE JUDGE OR THE JUDGES
FAMILY.
IT SIMPLY WAS NOT PUT IN THE
GAG ORDER THAT THE JUDGE ENTERED, SO YOU CANNOT FIND A
ENTERED, SO YOU CANNOT FIND A
VIOLATION OF SOMETHING THAT IS
NOT COVERED, BUT THAT IS NOT
THE ONLY POSSIBLE GROUND FOR
FINDING THAT HE HAS VIOLATED
SOMETHING HERE, AND THAT IS
THAT A STANDARD CONDITION OF
BEING OUT ON BAIL APPLIES IN
NEW YORK AND IN THE D.C.
FEDERAL CASE IN THE GEORGIA
STATE CASE.
THAT YOU NOT COMMIT A CRIME
WHILE YOU ARE OUT ON BAIL.
YOU KNOW THIS VERY WELL.
IT IS IN FACT I REMEMBER THE
D.C. CASE BEING ON AIR WHEN THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE WARNED HIM
THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT
CONDITION FOR HIM WAS THAT HE
NOT COMMIT A CRIME. THREATENING THE PRESIDENT OF
THREATENING THE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES IS A CRIME,
SO THE QUESTION WOULD BE THE
LEGAL AND FACTUAL QUESTION
WHETHER WHAT HE HAS ENGAGED IN
WITH RESPECT TO POSTING THE
IMAGE OF JOE BIDEN BOUND AND
GAGGED WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE
A BULLET HOLE IN HIS HEAD
CONSTITUTES THAT KIND OF
THREAT.
THE SAME THING COULD BE TRUE
UNDER NEW YORK LAW WITH RESPECT
TO JUDGES OR FAMILY MEMBERS AND
PERSONNEL.
SORT OF AN INDEPENDENT GROUND.
THE ONE THING THAT IS CLEAR IS
THAT HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO
BRING THE DONALD TRUMP INTO
HOLD A HEARING ON WHAT HIS
INTENT WAS BECAUSE THROUGH HIS
ACTIONS AND OBVIOUSLY TO TIGHTEN UP DRAMATICALLY THAT
TIGHTEN UP DRAMATICALLY THAT
GAG ORDERS SO THAT THERE IS NO
THREAT NOT JUST TO THE JUDGE
AND HIS FAMILY MEMBERS, BUT
REMEMBER THIS AS A SPILLOVER
EFFECT OF A JURY AND ALSO FOR
WITNESSES AND PROSPECTIVE
JURORS.
THEY ARE LOOKING AT WHAT IS
GOING ON.
JUST ASK IF YOU ARE A POTENTIAL
JUROR ARE YOU GOING TO SAY I
WANT TO BE ON THIS TRIAL WHEN
MY NAME WOULD BE KNOWN BY DONALD TRUMP AND HIS
DONALD TRUMP AND HIS
CONFEDERATES? ARE YOU GOING TO
FEEL THREATENED AND INTIMIDATED
BY HAVING TO TAKE THE STAND AND
TELLING THE TRUTH?
THIS IS ALL A REASON I AM
CONFIDENT THE JUDGE IS THINKING
ABOUT THIS NOT JUST IN TERMS OF
HIS SELF AND FAMILY BUT ABOUT
PROTECTING THE RULE OF LAW.
EXACTLY THE CLIP THAT YOU
PLAYED IT IS WHAT IS GOING TO
BE ANIMATED JUDGES AND
PROSECUTORS TO TAKE STEPS TO
MAKE SURE THAT OUR SYSTEM OF
LAW IS SAFE WITH RESPECT TO THE
FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES WHO IS ATTACKING THE VERY FOUNDATION OF THE RULE OF
VERY FOUNDATION OF THE RULE OF
LAW.
>> WE HAVE HAD UNPRECEDENTED
MEASURES TAKEN TO PROTECT THEIR
IDENTITIES AND SOME OF HIS
CASES.
THE LEVEL OF AN AMENITY BETWEEN JURORS THEMSELVES WHEN THEY ARE
JURORS THEMSELVES WHEN THEY ARE
BEING TOLD AND EVEN CIVIL CASES
THEY WERE NOT EVEN SUPPOSED TO
TELL EACH OTHER WHAT THEIR TRUE
NAMES WERE.
ONLY SUPPOSED TO GO BY NUMBERS.
I WANT TO ASK BEFORE WE TAKE A
QUICK BREAK ABOUT THIS.
I POSTED THIS ON MY SOCIAL
MEDIA. WHEREBY A LEADER VILIFIES A
WHEREBY A LEADER VILIFIES A
PERSON OR THEM LIKELY TO
INSTIGATE RANDOM SUPPORTERS TO
ATTACK THOSE TARGETS WHILE THE
INSTIGATOR MAINTAINS A VENEER
OF PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.
NOBODY HAS TO READ BETWEEN THE
LINES.
I THINK EVERYBODY CLEARLY KNOWS
WHO I AM TALKING ABOUT, BUT
DON'T YOU THINK TRUMP HAS
CROSSED THAT LINE OF PLAUSIBLE
DENIABILITY?
THE IDEA OF I AM REPOSTING
THINGS OR I'M JUST PUTTING
SOMETHING UP IN MY POLITICAL
FREE SPEECH OR PURSUIT AND
PROTECTION OF MY FIRST
AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
>> I COULD NOT AGREE MORE.
JUST REMEMBER THAT MIGHT HAVE
BEEN PLAUSIBLE THE FIRST TIME
OR THE SECOND TIME HE DID THIS.
WHEN YOU SEE THAT YOU HAVE THIS
REPEATED CALL AND RESPONSE
AFFECT HE CANNOT KEEP SAYING I
JUST CALLED AND I WAS SHOCKED.
THAT IS EVERYTHING ABOUT WHAT
HE IS CHARGED WITH IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS CASE.
THERE IS MUCH MORE THAN THAT
LEADING UP TO IT, BUT THOSE EVENTS WERE THE QUINTESSENTIAL
EVENTS WERE THE QUINTESSENTIAL
CALL AND RESPONSE CHARGE HERE
WHERE HE KNOWS DARN WELL HOW
PEOPLE ARE GOING TO RESPOND.
THAT IS WHY YOU CAN VERY MUCH
HAVE A HEARING WHERE THE JUDGE
CAN BRING THE PARTIES IN AND
BASICALLY HAVE THE FORMER
PRESIDENT TESTIFIED ABOUT WHAT
HAPPENED AND WHAT HE WAS
THINKING. IF HE DOES NOT WANT
TO TESTIFY THAT IS FINE, BUT
THEN HE CAN TAKE THE FACTS AS
SENT OUT BY THE GOVERNMENT.
GOING TO BE CROSS-EXAMINED BY
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Alvin Bragg threatens Trump with contempt charges for violating gag order
The Faulkner Focus 5/28/24 FULL END SHOW | BREAKING NEWS TODAY May 28, 2024
‘Cows coming home!’: Mary Trump says ‘unprepared’ Donald is ‘short circuiting’ in court
Ex-Trump official predicts Melania's behavior amid Trump criminal trial
Trump on trial: New York vs. Donald Trump Day 5 Highlights
Trump Claims He Has '$500 Million' Cash For His Bond #TYT