Does this $60,000 Combat Goggle Actually Work?
Summary
TLDR美国陆军正在测试集成视觉增强系统(IVAS),这是一种类似于苹果公司的混合现实头戴式显示器,旨在提高士兵在白天和夜间的机动性和致命性。IVAS集成了夜视、GPS导航、热成像、3D地图、武器瞄准和目标标记等功能,可以与无人机等传感器集成,提供实时战场图像。尽管IVAS在2022年的测试中遇到了一些问题,如士兵反馈显示设备在低光环境下性能不佳、笨重、可靠性差,以及可能的网络和电磁谱环境中的脆弱性,但陆军仍计划继续推进该项目。IVAS计划在未来十年内采购多达120,000套设备,预计总成本高达220亿美元。目前,该计划正面临国会的激烈辩论,讨论是否应该投资IVAS或下一代的ENVG-B护目镜。
Takeaways
- 🤖 美国陆军正在测试集成视觉增强系统(IVAS),这是一项高科技的混合现实头戴显示设备,旨在提高士兵的机动性和杀伤力。
- 💰 IVAS项目耗资巨大,计划在未来十年内购买多达120,000套设备,总价值高达220亿美元。
- 📡 IVAS集成了夜视、GPS导航、热成像、3D地图、武器瞄准和目标标记等多项功能,甚至可以在隐蔽处进行射击。
- 👓 IVAS由微软基于HoloLens 2智能眼镜技术开发,最新版本1.2在2023年发布,相较于早期版本在设计上更为轻便和舒适。
- 🚨 根据内部调查和士兵的初步反馈,IVAS面临一些重大挑战,包括士兵对设备的接受度不高和一些操作上的问题。
- 🤔 存在对IVAS是否会让士兵过分依赖技术的担忧,同时还有对其在网络战环境中潜在脆弱性的考虑。
- 🛡️ IVAS可能会取代传统的夜视镜,成为自二战以来步兵操作层面上具有重大影响的第二个设备。
- 📉 有关报告显示,士兵对IVAS的接受度低,偏好现有装备,并对IVAS的低光性能、显示质量、笨重性、可靠性等方面表示不满。
- 🧐 有观点认为,尽管存在不适,但如果IVAS能在精确火力和战场图像方面提供优势,那么这些牺牲可能是值得的。
- 💡 陆军认为IVAS与增强型夜视镜(ENVG-B)之间的资金分配不是问题,他们已经采购了足够数量的ENVG-B。
- ⏰ 陆军正在推动IVAS的快速发展,计划在2025年前将其投入使用,尽管目前存在争议和挑战。
Q & A
IVAS项目的全称是什么?
-IVAS的全称是Integrated Visual Augmentation System,即集成视觉增强系统。
IVAS与传统夜视设备有何不同?
-IVAS是一种混合现实头显,旨在整合夜视、通信、GPS导航和目标定位等多项功能,不仅仅是单一的夜视功能。
IVAS的目的是什么?
-IVAS的目的是通过提供改进的移动性和杀伤力,无论白天或夜晚,都能提升士兵的战场表现,同时替代多种现有的军用设备。
IVAS 1.2版本有哪些新升级?
-IVAS 1.2版本的主要升级包括改进的低光夜视增强功能,更小的设备尺寸,以及更轻便的眼镜式设计,提高了士兵佩戴的舒适性。
IVAS的开发商是谁?
-IVAS是由微软公司开发,基于其HoloLens 2智能眼镜技术。
为什么IVAS在军中的接受度较低?
-根据测试反馈,士兵们认为IVAS在低光表现、显示质量、舒适性和可靠性方面存在问题,这影响了其在实际操作中的使用效果和士兵的接受度。
IVAS与无人机技术如何结合?
-IVAS计划与地面和空中平台的传感器集成,可以实时接收无人机等平台的数据,改变侦察方式,提供战场上的实时图像和信息。
IVAS项目面临的主要挑战是什么?
-IVAS项目的主要挑战包括技术成熟度不足、士兵接受度低、设备的物理舒适性问题,以及高昂的成本和潜在的光学干扰问题。
美国国防部如何评估IVAS项目的进展?
-国防部的运营测试和评估办公室对IVAS的低光感应器和用户接受度表示关注,强调需要进一步改进以满足战场需求。
IVAS的未来展望是什么?
-尽管存在挑战,但美国军方认为通过持续的技术迭代和改进,IVAS有潜力极大地改变战场操作方式,特别是在提高战场信息化和网络化方面。
Outlines
🤖 美军的先进视觉增强系统(IVAS)
IVAS 是美国陆军开发的先进视觉增强系统,类似于苹果的Vision Pro,但用途是帮助士兵呼叫炮火支援而非叫车服务。该技术已经研发数十年,最新版本已发放给10000名士兵进行测试。尽管存在一些挑战,如内部调查和初步士兵反馈不佳,IVAS 成为了国会激烈辩论的焦点,讨论是否应继续投资IVAS或转向下一代的EnV GB护目镜。IVAS 旨在通过混合现实抬头显示器提供夜视、通信、GPS、目标定位和模拟训练等功能。微软基于HoloLens 2技术开发了IVAS,目前1.2版本已经发布,带来了新的升级。同时,视频还提供了赢取价值超过7000美元的第三代夜视镜的活动。
📡 IVAS 的技术升级与争议
IVAS 的1.2版本在2023年发布,相较于旧版本,它具有更小、更轻的外形,改善了士兵在佩戴时的舒适度。2022年6月,70名步兵对IVAS进行了为期3周的实地测试,包括移动、攻击、防守和实弹演习。测试结果显示,IVAS 在六项操作测试中失败了四项,有士兵甚至认为该设备可能会危及生命。尽管IVAS 承诺将与地面和空中平台传感器集成,提供实时数据,但士兵们对其低光传感器的性能、显示质量、笨重性、可靠性、敌我识别能力、射击物理障碍和有限的周边视野等方面表达了不满。
🤔 IVAS 用户接受度与采购问题
内部调查指出,IVAS 项目官员没有定义最低用户接受水平来确定IVAS 是否满足用户需求。陆军未来司令部官员将用户接受度理解为士兵使用IVAS 更快更好地完成工作,但陆军尚未开发出任何百分比或其他衡量用户接受度的方法。此外,业务内参获得了士兵训练反馈,显示IVAS 在2022年演示中的用户接受度仍然很低,士兵们更倾向于使用他们当前的装备。关于采购,陆军表示已经采购了足够数量的增强型夜视镜,以满足他们认为的需求。
🎯 IVAS 的作战影响与国会的审查
IVAS 可能会成为自二战以来对步兵作战影响最大的设备之一。它能够实时将战场信息反馈给指挥部,使呼叫炮火支援变得更加容易。然而,也存在一些潜在的负面影响,如士兵在使用IVAS 时出现的头痛、眼疲劳、恶心等问题。国会对IVAS 计划进行了严格审查,因为陆军似乎没有为获取EN-VGB增强型夜视镜请求额外资金,而是为IVAS 请求了资金。尽管IVAS 遇到了问题,陆军仍全力推进该计划,计划到2025年部署IVAS 护目镜。
🛡️ IVAS 的未来发展与支持方式
尽管IVAS 存在许多问题,陆军领导层似乎相信,随着技术的快速发展,他们能够在资金耗尽前解决问题。IVAS 的成本相当高,大约为每个单位60000美元,但由于它是一个集成系统,可以替代许多单独的设备,如夜视镜和GPS,因此成本得到了一定的抵消。另一个主要担忧是IVAS 在网络竞争激烈的电磁频谱环境中的脆弱性,存在敌人可能黑客攻击该设备的风险。陆军的最新新闻稿特别称其为全天候战斗护目镜,表明它应该在各种天气条件下都能提高士兵的视力。作者认为,如果给予足够的时间和资金进行进一步开发,IVAS 将成为一个必不可少的工具,尤其对于指挥人员来说。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡ivas
💡夜视
💡GPS导航
💡热成像
💡3D地图
💡武器瞄准
💡士兵反馈
💡国会辩论
💡技术依赖
💡数据收集
💡增强现实
Highlights
美国陆军的IVAS(集成视觉增强系统)是一种混合现实抬头显示器,旨在提高士兵在白天和夜间的机动性和致命性。
IVAS旨在取代夜视镜、通信设备、GPS,并接管如何瞄准敌方位置以及与小队一起运行训练模拟。
公共防御合同为IVAS提供了在未来十年内购买多达120,000副护目镜的选项,总价值高达220亿美元。
IVAS 1.2版本在2023年发布,带来了新的升级,包括低光夜视图像增强能力的改进。
IVAS由几个独立的部分组成,包括一个抬头显示器护目镜、一个称为“冰球”的身穿式计算机、一个网络数据无线电和每个士兵的三个独立的电池组。
2022年6月,IVAS在实地进行了为期3周的测试,由70名不同的步兵进行了三项72小时的训练场景。
IVAS将与地面和空中平台传感器集成,能够接收有人和无人飞行器的实时数据。
IVAS可能会将每个士兵变成一个传感器节点,被动地收集关于单位移动、弹药状态和战场情况的实时数据。
IVAS项目因未定义最小用户接受水平来确定IVAS是否满足用户需求而受到内部调查的批评。
士兵反馈显示,IVAS在2022年的演示中未能通过六项操作测试中的四项,一些士兵对其实用性表示怀疑。
IVAS 1.0版本在重量、低光性能、显示质量、笨重性、可靠性、敌我识别能力、射击物理障碍和有限的周边视觉等方面受到批评。
IVAS的生理影响包括头痛、眼疲劳、恶心、定向障碍、头晕、运动病、颈部紧张和视野狭窄。
尽管存在问题,美国陆军仍计划在2025年前部署IVAS护目镜,并已获得资金支持。
美国国会对IVAS项目进行了审查,并对陆军未全额资助EN-VGB(增强型夜视护目镜)而对IVAS提供资金表示质疑。
陆军和国会之间存在关于是否应该投资IVAS或EN-VGB的激烈辩论,这关系到有限资源的分配。
IVAS的批评者指出,如果设备未能满足士兵的需求,可能会导致高达218亿美元的纳税人资金浪费。
IVAS 1.2版本被宣传为全天候战斗护目镜,旨在在各种天气条件下提高士兵的视野。
IVAS技术允许士兵在执行任务途中通过车辆周围的高端摄像头保持对周围环境的了解。
作者认为,如果给予足够的时间和资金进行进一步开发,IVAS将成为战场上的一个重要工具,尤其是对于指挥人员。
Transcripts
this is ivas It's the US Army's very own
version of Apple Vision Pro but instead
of helping you call for Uber it helps
you call for fire the military has
actually been busy working on the
concept for decades with the newest
attempt integrated visual augmentation
system being issued to 10,000 soldiers
for testing so far but an internal
investigation by the Pentagon and
initial poor Soldier feedback suggest
there are some major challenges ahead
and that's why ivas has become the
subject of a fierce Congressional debate
whether the Army should invest in ivas
or next Generation EnV GB goggles
goodbye fog of War hello crippling
addiction to technology what exactly is
ivas well according to the Army it's a
mixed reality heads up display to
provide Soldiers with improved mobility
and lethality during the day or at night
so essentially it aims to replace your
night vision goggles Communications GPS
and take over how you target enemy
positions and run training simulations
with your squad the Public Defense
contract for ivas has an option to buy
as many as 120,000 goggles over the next
decade for as much as $22 billion if
they want so a lot is at stake here with
this device version 1.2 just dropped in
2023 and we're going to talk about all
of its new upgrades as well as my
concerns as a regular old grunt about
whether this whole concept is really
practical or not but first I have an
awesome opportunity for you to win these
Generation 3 nvg 50 dual one tube night
vision goggles by tribe Optics they're
worth over
$7,000 I've partnered again with
veteran-owned small business get enterto
win.com to give these away to you the
way it works is you just click the link
in the description text below the video
head over to go. gettinger to win.com
taskandpurpose buy one of our sweet
limited edition Collectibles and you're
automatically entered to win these nvg
50 night vision goggles might be the
best available at any price price with a
minimum F specification of 1,600 they're
equipped with night vision intensifier
tubes manufactured by the same company
that supplies US Special Forces so
they're designed to deliver premium
performance at an affordable price the
tribe Optics nvgs are also excellent for
field use and hunting and the giant 50°
field of view is ideal for scanning
Woodland and Urban Terrain alike when I
was in Arizona recently my buddy used
his night vision goggles to drive
through the mountains and Pitch Black
these things really come in handy just
click the link in the description below
head over to go.get win.com
taskandpurpose and buy one of our cool
collectible mugs to automatically be
entered to win they're a veteran owned
small business so I'm really excited to
partner with them and to give you guys
this opportunity you must be a us
resident in order to be eligible to win
I appreciate your support and best of
luck beare Parts Army it's obvious why
Apple Microsoft Facebook are all pouring
the GDP of small countries worth of
dollars into developing this augmented
reality Tech this is because the Apple
vision and ivas goggles could
potentially unlock tremendous potential
in US mere mortals the promise of
networked soldiers is a dream that big
army has feverishly been working on in
one form or another since the 1980s each
time it's failed over and over again but
it's taken us one step closer the latest
iteration ivas started in 2018 so I
think the best way to break this down is
to start off explaining how it works
ideally in theory and then get into to
all of the negative soldier feedback and
the controversy surrounding it developed
by Microsoft it's based on their Hollow
lens 2 smart glasses headset technology
and they just delivered 20 of the new
and improved versions The 1.2 prototypes
a quick rundown of its promised
capabilities that were tested include
night vision GPS navigation thermal
vision 3D maps weapon targeting
objectives visually highlighted friendly
and enemy markers you could fire from
the hip or around the corner from behind
cover while seeing where the target
reticle is personally I could think of
one reason why better 3D maps would be
useful during my first raid on a house
in IR rock it took six kicks to get the
door open so everyone knew exactly where
we were coming from and then we figured
out it was the wrong house in the first
place and as I'm saying this out loud
I'm realizing it's an embarrassing story
I probably should have kept to myself
according to the Army the new IVs 1.2
version will give you the ability to
hinge the device so you can raise and
lower the display very similar to how
you do with with night vision goggles in
case you need to use your old human eyes
for a second and so from what I can
gather one of the major upgrades here is
improvements to the low light night
vision image intensifying ability the
ivas is made up of a few separate parts
actually kind of like the Apple Vision
it includes a heads up display goggles a
body worn computer known as the puck a
network data radio and three separate
battery packs for each Soldier more
stuff to carry yes I can't wait please
sir I want some more and in fact right
off the bat the first thing that jumps
out to me compared to the older variants
is its much smaller improved lower
profile glasses the first version in
2018 looked like cumbersome ski goggles
and now they look like lighter weight
hater blockers I mean look at the
original version they look a little
goofy looks like RoboCop 2014 and I want
to look like Robocop 1987 in all
seriousness this new version is a big
step up in addressing one of the biggest
points of criticism isms that the tested
soldiers had which was that it was
uncomfortable and annoying to wear now
where do they get those criticisms from
well hias was officially tested in the
field in June of 2022 over the course of
3 weeks by 70 different infantrymen to
see what needed tweaking they wore them
during three 72-hour training scenarios
which included movement toward an enemy
attacking and defending a position
couple of live fire events during day
and night and they put them through the
paces the goal of the mission today is
using the avas technology to launch and
recover other aircraft and to also call
in a nonline metac while they're also uh
receiving Dynamic Mission changes while
they're in route and also on the ground
what I wouldn't give to be able to test
those out at least it promises to make
recording Tik toks easier one of the
biggest updates to the program that I
never thought about before is how the
heads up display will work in
combination with another new technology
that's changing the face of Modern
Warfare drones according to the Army IVs
will integrate with ground and Air
Platform sensors what that means is it
can take in data from manned and
unmanned aerial Vehicles a drone flying
overhead will be able to send you live
pictures of what you're walking into in
advance what does that mean for your
regular grunt the way you conduct
reconnaissance will completely change
but it also gives us a hint as to why I
think the Army is pushing this device so
hard the ivas would turn every Soldier
into a sensor node it's the concept of
soldier as a sensor you know as opposed
to Soldier as a human being think of all
the live data that this thing will
passively collect on your head is your
unit currently retreating or moving
forward is your Battalion at 20% ammo or
90% that info could be collected from
your weapon sent to your headset back to
command did you just make fun of your
Commander's uncanny resemblance to
Napoleon bonapart these these are all
things that your command wants no needs
to know Facebook and Instagram in their
Wildest Dreams want this level of access
to your personal information while many
of my favorite creators on YouTube are
busy reviewing the new Apple Vision Pro
wondering how it might change the way we
work love and play I'm wondering how
augmented reality will change the way we
fight Wars if I were to take a little
bit too big of a hit from the pieace
pipe I would say that these devices are
going to record every second of War so
they can be used this train models for
robotss to eventually replace soldiers
in the future they're like how we train
machines to recognize objects with
capture not sure how I would like a
video recording of all my war crimes but
everything has its tradeoffs the big
takeaway here is that you're now adding
a 100,000 data collection devices
running around on the ground feeding
targeting information to your bigger
ticket assets like your himars and f-35s
and developing a shared picture of the
battlefield infantry have one device
really since World War II that's been
issued to them that has a operational
level impact and I think that's the
radio it's their ability to call for
fire like a hell diver the IVs would be
the second device with an operational
impact for the grunts as it feeds
realtime information of the battlefield
picture back to headquarters and makes
calling for fire easier I suspect it's a
command and control device as much as
anything else it gives a shared picture
of the battlefield so you can know what
second Squad is is doing right now wait
second Squad what the are you doing
right now while all of that sounds
really exciting and it's easy to get
carried away about future potential here
there's also some big potential
downsides that we're going to need to
address and we get these straight from
the 50-page Inspector General report
that investigated the Army's management
of the program the IG is like when you
see police internal investigation
departments except for the military
these are the dudes who are responsible
for holding a lot of the defense
spending accountable if you blow the
whistle on defense project you'll end up
with an IG report unless it's one of
boeings don't do that what I'm assuming
is that someone close to or involved in
the project maybe someone who trained on
the device brought it to the attention
of the IG that the Army was moving
forward with the project even though
there was a high number of troops who
didn't find it effective that's
typically how these Inspector General
reports are spun up it could have also
been the fact that there was all these
major delays that have hindered the
program so far according to the internal
investigation the biggest thing is quote
ivas program officials did not Define
minimum user acceptance levels to
determine whether ivas would meet user
needs the report States Army future
command officials inferred user
acceptance as a soldier doing their job
better and quicker using ivas however
the Army has not developed any
percentage or otherwise measurement of
user acceptance to determine whether the
system is acceptable now with what the
internal investigation is suggesting
there is that the test results which are
mostly redacted from the public report
as you can see are not designed to
accurately determine if troops actually
found it useful or not Business Insider
got access to that actual Soldier
feedback from training according to
their report IVs failed four out of six
operational tests during the 2022
demonstration one test Soldier even
threw some serious Shades saying quote
theice would have gotten us killed when
referring to how the light from the
holographic display onto the goggles
would betray you by being visible for
hundreds of meters away so much for
light discipline to be fair I don't know
if they solved that in version 1.2
though so what this means is that old
versions The 1.0 and 1.1 will mainly be
used in training units to teach the
basics on the device Meanwhile your
close combat infantry units will start
receiving ivas 1.2 since it's more ready
for the prime time for example just how
effective will the night vision and
thermal sensors on it be compared to
Generation 3 nvg tubes I'm assuming it
uses digital night vision and thermal
which is currently not as bright or
clear of an image as far as I know sure
the ivas aims to offer an 80° field of
view which is like double what your
standard night vision goggles produce
however earlier versions that had that
wide field of view contributed to making
users feel weird and sick while wearing
them because resolution at the edges was
blurry I'd be very curious to know what
the refresh rate on the night vision is
for the ivas because if it isn't really
good latency the delay could make
operations like night driving more
dangerous compared to traditional nvgs
these are things I don't know however
there is an important aspect of
procurement that we need to address the
Army has stated that there are many
examples where Soldier acceptance was
initially low such as the original night
vision goggles in the 1970s machine guns
and the invention of automated transport
which obviously all turned out to be
very useful user acceptance isn't always
a metric that lends itself to objective
measures partly because troops can be
biased towards what they already know so
the arm is basically paraphrasing the
late steeve jobs here saying some people
say give the customers what they want
but that's not my Approach our job is to
figure out what they're going to want
before they do but there are more
downsides part of my degree of
skepticism of the I as comes from a 2022
and 2023 annual report for the office of
the director operational test and
evaluation this is the group that's the
main advisor to the Secretary of Defense
on equipment tests and evaluations
they're the ones that hold acquisition
programs accountable basically providing
independent assessments to Congress who
will end up approving what equipment
ends up in the budget and what does not
so what says has a Major Impact I'll put
a link in the description if you want to
read them yourself but the test office
wasn't exactly stoked on the new tech
stating that troops specifically wanted
improvements to the low light sensor on
the device saying quote the results of
the Ops demo user acceptance remains low
soldiers prefer their current equipment
soldiers cited ivas 1.0 poor low light
performance display quality
cumbersomeness poor reliability
inability to distinguish friend from Fox
difficulty shooting physical impairments
and limited peripheral vision as reasons
for their dissatisfaction I get it I can
barely hit the 300 met Target without
six camera strap to my head how much
does it weigh exactly Todd south of army
times wrote an article stating that ivas
1.0 version weighed a total of 3.4 lbs
with 2.4 of those pounds being the most
important part which is placed right on
the solders Noggin for context I was
surprised to learn that the en vgb also
weighs about 2.5 lb but un like that
this is something you're going to be
wearing either day or night this
suggests to me that it's possible to
slim down 1.2 version of the goggles
weigh even less so that's encouraging
news I'm uh Captain Wright I'm the
Charlie trip Commander 573 had second
airborn division it's being marketed as
kind of a night vision goggle that ties
Optics thermal messaging and planning
all into one one of the weirdest
problems identified in that
investigation that I found I think will
be familiar to any one of you who have
used civilian million virtual reality or
augmented reality devices the
physiological impacts which means troops
suffered headaches from wearing the
device in fact 80% of them who experien
problems found that after 3 hours of use
you would have eye strain and nausea
issues it's interesting because users
also reported feeling the same way when
using Apple vision and similar products
like VR here's the quote from the
operational test and evaluation report
by the government the majority of
soldiers reported at least one symptom
of physical impairment to include
disorientation dizziness eye strain
headaches motion sickness nausea neck
strain and tunnel vision in the Army if
you complain about a headache I
guarantee your squad leader will advise
you to get the sand out of your and take
a few moin but that's not exactly an
option when you can't take these off I
own virtual reality goggles and while I
find it to be an amazing experience
personally I also found that it gave me
a weird dissociative feeling after using
them for more than an hour Eddie burbach
did a great job outlining how that feels
in his review of the Apple Vision I
don't know maybe the Army sees that as a
good side effect that you're
depersonalized in the middle of combat
but this is part of the reason why I
think it's possible and I'm just
spitballing here let me know what you
think of this I'm just talking off the
cuff just Playing devil's advocate here
it's possible that the Army believes it
might be worth it for soldiers to be a
little uncomfortable and a little
impeded when it comes to shooting if it
means that the ivas is a device that can
better call for precision fire and give
better Battlefield picture on an
operational level even if it sacrifices
a little on the Tactical level uh think
of it this way body armor was
uncomfortable and reduced Mobility also
and I'd rather take that off but it also
is true that it saved a lot of lives but
that's not where the debate about this
comes from it comes from the possibility
that the Army might be prioritizing a
technology that's not yet ready to field
at the expense of one that is
what happened is the ivas program has
recently come under intense scrutiny
because the Army appears to have not
requested additional funding for
acquiring the en vgb enhanced night
vision goggles and has instead requested
funding for ivas despite the problems
it's run into they're pushing full steam
ahead with plans to field the ivas
goggles which they originally wanted to
do by
2025 here is the US Senate armed
services committee asking the secretary
of the army Christine waral questions
about the ivas program I asked um why
the Army had once again failed to
include full funding um for the enhanced
night vision goggles binoculars
emgb um Congress stepped in last year to
restore the full 300 million I think
Microsoft knows that this is this is it
they either get it done and get it to a
place where our soldiers want to use it
or we will move on so you can see they
have two different competing points of
view about what's happening there
exactly but this is why Congress denied
the Army's request to acquire 6,900
additional headsets and reduced their
overall budget they now have 40 million
to fix problems that these soldiers
identified and there's 125 million that
of the original funds that could go
towards completing version 1.2 so that's
what's at the center of this procurement
showdown in the one corner you have your
EnV GB it's a classic you know it you
love it soldiers love it it's a crowd
favorite then in the other corner you
have ivas it's a little risky it's bold
but it could eventually be the future of
warfare and a potential game Cher but
the two projects are indirectly
competing for funding and if you're in
an army leadership position it's your
job to figure out how to balance
allocation of the finite number of
resources now it's important to note
that the Army believes this is a
non-issue they state that they've
already procured the number of enhanced
night vision goggles that they thought
would meet their requirement one of the
biggest criticisms from the dod internal
investigation says quote procuring ivas
without attaining user acceptance could
result in wasting up to 21.8 billion in
taxpayer funds to feel the system that
soldiers may not want to use or use as
intended but saying the Army could waste
$22 billion is a little bit of an
exaggeration and some critics have
pointed out that it's kind of an appeal
to a motion because that assumes that
the entire 120,000 devices would be
fielded while the device doesn't work
which is unlikely that number is the
total hypothetical ceiling for the
project if it hits all of its
performance development milestones it
even includes the cost of spare parts
maintenance and training on it why
120,000 goggles that seems a little
arbitrary well my guess is because
that's how many active duty US Army
infantrymen there are although I've seen
estimates that are much lower than that
and the dod doesn't release that
information publicly believe me you I
would be the last person that you'll
find arguing against investing in
Innovation for our soldiers I think
incremental development of these devices
is absolutely the correct thing to do
they've already advanced leaps ahead in
just three short years and if I had to
guess I would say that Army leadership
is seeing how much better these are
getting in such a short period of time
and they believe they can get it to work
before they run out of funds many of the
reviews of those device also point out
the insane price of them costing roughly
as much as a used car but the military's
ivas takes it a step further running
taxpayers the low low cost of only
$60,000 per unit this is offset somewhat
by the fact that it's an all-in system
that replaces many other Standalone
devices like your night vision goggles
your GPS another major concern that t&
named was the quote IVs 1.0
vulnerabilities in a cyber contested in
electromagnetic spectrum environment as
detailed in the classified version this
means there's some concerns about if the
enemy could hack into the this device or
it could just be turned into a 32 lb
$60,000 brick I also heard rumors from
those close to the project that the
original version had trouble in light
rain and would frequently turn itself
off and had glitches often what would
every training NCO do if they couldn't
use their favorite phrase if it ain't
raining we ain't training I'm not
certain if that was fixed but some
evidence that it might have been comes
from the newest press release from the
Army which specifically calls it an all
Weather fighting goggle this is a new
term for the device that I haven't seen
any army Publications used for it before
the whole point is that it's supposed to
increase your vision not decrease it and
when they work out all the BRS and
improve it troops will have increased
Vision in some ways for example they'll
be able to see through their vehicle and
have situational awareness as to what
the heck is going on outside never mind
don't look out there what's going on
outside the vehicle isn't important this
prevents you from dismounting though
into dangerous situations now we've got
relatively high-end cameras all the way
around the vehicle both day and night
and the soldiers wearing the new ivas
technology are able to use those cameras
and access it while they're in route to
Mission so instead of staring at a blank
steel wall they can keep up with what's
going on around the vehicle if you're a
regular viewer of the channel you'll
know one of my least favorite things
about being in a mechanized infantry
Striker unit was being locked in the
back of a dark hole having no idea
what's going on outside the vehicle When
we dropped ramp having said all of that
my personal feelings on whether your
average INF would benefit from the ivas
device I think absolutely if it's given
enough time and money to further develop
the ivas it'll become an essential tool
even if it's just something that all
Squad leaders or platoon leaders are
given at first so that it's a tool for
command because that's really what a
squad Leader's main job is they're meant
to be setting up the most effective
fields of fire they're meant to be
coordinating Logistics ammo resupply it
wasn't me your lowest grunt who was
navigating and making sure your map was
correct that we were hitting that right
house during raid that responsibil is on
the squad leaders and Leadership and to
a lesser extent your team leaders that's
who I think would benefit the most from
having an ivas first so if you're
looking for a way to support me and the
channel just head over to go.get iner to
win.com taskin purpose get one of our
sweet limited edition Collectibles and
you'll be automatically entered to win
and the deadline to enter is April 26th
at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time as
always thank you very much for your
support and good luck
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
WHISTLEBLOWER Reveals Complete AGI TIMELINE, 2024 - 2027 (Q*, QSTAR)
I Survived 100 Days as an ELEMENTAL WARDEN in Minecraft
Best AI Music Generator in 2024 - SUNO vs UDIO
Microsoft's New PHI-3 AI Turns Your iPhone Into an AI Superpower! (Game Changer!)
Best FREE VPN for Windows 2024 💸 TOP 4 Free VPN for PC options! (TESTED)
Website Design Process for Clients (Start to Finish)