Trump on trial: New York vs. Donald Trump Day 5 Highlights

MSNBC
23 Apr 202443:25

Summary

TLDR在这段文字中,描述了前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在曼哈顿法庭上面临的刑事审判。法庭上的气氛紧张,记者们报道了审判的详细情况,包括法庭的气味、警察的紧张状态、法官摩尔的声音以及检察官和证人的陈述。特别提到了前特朗普律师迈克尔·科恩与美国媒体公司CEO大卫·佩克的交易,以及他们如何通过做账来掩盖支付给成人片女星斯托米·丹尼尔斯的封口费。此外,还提到了特朗普组织的首席财务官艾伦·魏塞尔伯格在银行对账单上的手写记录,这些记录详细说明了如何将支付给丹尼尔斯的13万美元转换为看起来像是收入支付的42万美元。整个事件揭示了特朗普在2016年大选期间可能存在的非法行为,以及随后的掩盖行为。

Takeaways

  • 🚨 前美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在曼哈顿的法庭上面临刑事审判,这是美国政治历史上的重要审判。
  • 🎤 法庭上的氛围紧张,记者和旁听者都对这次历史性的审判表现出极大的兴趣。
  • 🤵 检察官Matthew Colangelo在法庭上表现出专业和坚定,他详细陈述了案件的关键点。
  • 📝 法庭记录显示,特朗普组织首席财务官Allen Weisselberg在银行对账单上记录了关于支付给Stormy Daniels封口费的详细步骤。
  • 💸 特朗普同意支付420,000美元给迈克尔·科恩,这笔钱远超过正常的偿还金额,表明特朗普有意掩盖科恩支付给丹尼尔斯的非法款项。
  • 🤫 法庭上出现了尴尬的失误,证人David Packer在试图回忆电话号码的最后四位时不小心说出了整个电话号码。
  • 📉 特朗普在法庭上看起来比以往老了许多,似乎对自己的刑事被告身份感到痛苦。
  • 🗣️ 辩护律师托德·布兰奇在开场陈述中多次被检察官提出异议,导致法官多次中断发言。
  • 🚫 法官对特朗普下达了禁止公开评论本案证人和陪审团成员的命令,但特朗普可能违反了这一命令。
  • 💰 如果特朗普被判藐视法庭,可能会面临罚款或最多30天监禁,尽管检察官并未寻求监禁。
  • ⏰ 法庭将于第二天上午就特朗普可能违反禁止公开评论证人和陪审团成员的命令举行听证会。

Q & A

  • 在法庭上,前总统唐纳德·特朗普的律师托德·布兰奇在辩护中提到了哪些关键点?

    -托德·布兰奇在辩护中提到,迈克尔·科恩向斯托米·丹尼尔斯支付的130,000美元是为了阻止她公开对特朗普的虚假指控,并且他认为签订保密协议是完全合法的。他还暗示特朗普是敲诈的受害者,并指出特朗普相信这些保密协议是合法的,因为他有律师为他谈判这些协议。

  • 检察官在法庭上提出了哪些证据来支持他们对特朗普的指控?

    -检察官提出了包括录音带、电话记录、银行对账单以及艾伦·魏塞尔伯格的笔记等证据。录音带中特朗普被听到提出支付现金以解决斯托米·丹尼尔斯的问题;电话记录显示了在关键时期迈克尔·科恩和特朗普之间的通话;银行对账单显示了科恩向斯托米·丹尼尔斯支付的130,000美元;魏塞尔伯格的笔记详细记录了如何将支付给斯托米·丹尼尔斯的款项伪装成收入。

  • 法庭上有哪些人对特朗普的案件进行了评论,他们的观点是什么?

    -法庭上,前FBI总法律顾问安德鲁·魏斯曼和前曼哈顿地区检察官助理凯瑟琳·克里斯蒂安对特朗普的案件进行了评论。他们讨论了法庭上发生的情况,包括特朗普律师的辩护策略,以及检察官提出的证据。他们指出,尽管辩护律师试图质疑证据,但检察官提供的证据是有力的,并且特朗普律师的辩护可能会面临挑战。

  • 法庭上提到的“catch and kill”操作是什么?

    -“Catch and kill”是一种新闻操作,指的是媒体机构支付某人以获取某个故事的独家权利,然后选择不发布这个故事,以此来隐藏或压制信息。在这个案件中,美国媒体公司(AMI)被指控支付了封口费给那些声称与特朗普有不当关系的人,以阻止这些故事在选举前被公开。

  • 为什么法庭上对特朗普的律师提出的一些陈述有异议?

    -特朗普的律师在法庭上的一些陈述被检察官提出异议,因为这些陈述包含了法律结论,比如称斯托米·丹尼尔斯试图敲诈特朗普,这超出了辩护律师的陈述范围。此外,一些陈述可能基于已经通过预先审讯的动议排除的证据,或者试图引入不允许的证据,如律师建议的辩护。

  • 法庭上提到的“gag order”是什么,它对特朗普有何限制?

    -“Gag order”是一种法庭命令,禁止被告或其律师在法庭外对案件、证人或陪审团成员发表公开评论。在这个案件中,特朗普被禁止发表或指示他人发表有关已知或可预见的证人或陪审团成员的公开声明。违反这一命令可能会导致罚款或监禁。

  • 法庭上提到的大卫·佩克是谁,他在案件中扮演了什么角色?

    -大卫·佩克是美国媒体公司(AMI)的前首席执行官,该公司拥有《国家询问报》。在案件中,他作为证人出现,证实了他在支付封口费决策中的作用,以及他对杂志封面故事的重要性的强调。他的证词有助于证明特朗普与AMI之间的协议以及支付封口费的不寻常性。

  • 检察官如何证明特朗普与AMI之间的协议是为了影响选举?

    -检察官通过展示特朗普和AMI之间的交易超出了常规的支票簿新闻学做法,例如在调查之前就支付了异常高的封口费,以及在选举后释放了封口协议,表明这些支付是为了选举利益而非其他原因。此外,检察官引用了特朗普的社交媒体帖子和竞选集会上的演讲,以证明他关心这些故事可能对他的选民支持率产生的影响。

  • 法庭上提到的《国家询问报》的封面故事对选举有何影响?

    -《国家询问报》的封面故事通过在全国范围内的超市结账台展示支持特朗普的故事,可能对选举产生了一定的影响。尽管该杂志的实际读者数量有限,但其封面故事的广泛分布可能对公众舆论产生了影响,尤其是在选举期间。

  • 为什么检察官认为特朗普支付给迈克尔·科恩的款项是为了掩盖对斯托米·丹尼尔斯的支付?

    -检察官认为,特朗普支付给科恩的款项是为了掩盖对斯托米·丹尼尔斯的支付,因为支付金额被夸大,并且通过做账使其看起来像是为服务支付的收入,而不是封口费的报销。这种做法与特朗普作为一个精打细算的商人的形象不符,表明他有意隐藏科恩非法支付给丹尼尔斯的真实性质。

  • 特朗普的律师在法庭上如何为特朗普辩护?

    -特朗普的律师在法庭上为特朗普辩护,主要是通过质疑保密协议的合法性,暗示特朗普是敲诈的受害者,并主张特朗普相信律师为他谈判的保密协议是合法的。此外,律师还试图区分特朗普的商业行为和个人行为,暗示特朗普并未指示任何非法的会计处理。

Outlines

00:00

🏛️ 曼哈顿法庭现场直击

描述了作者亲身体验曼哈顿法庭的情景,包括法庭的氛围、警察的紧张状态、法官摩尔的声音特点、检察官马修·科朗杰洛的言辞风格以及证人大卫·帕克在法庭上的失误。同时,对前总统唐纳德·特朗普在法庭上的形象进行了描述,并提到了法庭的紧张气氛。

05:00

📝 法庭笔记与证据

详细说明了迈克尔·科恩与艾伦·魏塞尔伯格就支付斯托米·丹尼尔斯封口费的财务安排,包括如何将这笔费用伪装成合法的业务收入。强调了检察官拥有魏塞尔伯格记录的笔记,这些笔记详细记录了整个财务安排的过程。

10:02

💸 特朗普的财务操作与辩护策略

讨论了特朗普作为一个商业人物的节俭形象与他在支付科恩封口费时的异常行为之间的对比。指出了辩护方可能会利用这一点来质疑科恩支付的真实意图。同时,提到了前FBI总法律顾问安德鲁·韦斯曼和前助理地区检察官凯瑟琳·克里斯蒂安对案件的分析。

15:02

🤝 特朗普与美国媒体的协议

描述了特朗普与美国媒体之间的协议,以及他们如何通过支付封口费来影响选举。提到了特朗普对负面新闻的关注,以及在选举夜之后,美国媒体如何释放了之前封口的人物。

20:02

🚫 防止选举影响的逻辑与辩护

分析了辩护方可能的策略,即强调特朗普支付封口费与选举无关,而是仅仅支付法律费用。同时,讨论了检察官如何通过逻辑和证据来反驳这一辩护。

25:03

🗣️ 法庭证词与编辑决策

提供了大卫·帕克,美国媒体公司前CEO的证词,涉及他在出版决策中的角色,以及他对支付给特朗普相关故事的财务批准。强调了支付给特朗普相关故事的费用远远超出了正常范围,这可能表明了与特朗普的不寻常协议。

30:04

📰 国家询问报的影响力与特朗普

讨论了国家询问报在选举期间对特朗普的支持,以及这种支持可能对选举产生的影响。提到了特朗普辩护律师托德·布兰奇在开场陈述中遭遇的法律异议,以及这些异议对法庭程序的影响。

35:05

⚖️ 法庭异议与辩护策略

分析了在特朗普辩护律师的开场陈述中出现的频繁法律异议,以及这些异议对法庭氛围和陪审团心理可能产生的影响。讨论了法官如何处理这些异议,以及这些事件对审判过程的潜在影响。

40:07

🚫 禁止公开评论的命令

讨论了法庭对特朗普发布的禁止公开评论已知或可预见证人的命令,以及特朗普可能违反该命令的情况。提到了检察官要求就特朗普违反该命令举行听证会,并可能对特朗普进行罚款。

Mindmap

曼哈顿法院
前总统唐纳德·特朗普的刑事审判
法庭氛围描述:紧张、陈旧
警察和法庭工作人员的紧张状态
法官摩尔的温和语气
检察官Matthew Colangelo的陈述风格
证人David Packer无意中泄露电话号码
特朗普外貌的变化和情绪状态
审判环境与人物描述
迈克尔·科恩与特朗普组织财务官艾伦·魏塞尔伯格的会面
关于支付斯托米·丹尼尔斯封口费的讨论
通过做账手段掩饰支付性质
科恩提供的银行对账单
魏塞尔伯格的笔记作为证据
特朗普批准支付金额
特朗普的商业习惯与此次支付的异常
封口费与做账问题
辩护方对封口费的不同解释
特朗普的商业习惯被辩护方用作辩护点
辩护方对检察官证据的质疑
辩护方策略
检察官对特朗普与美国媒体合谋的指控
特朗普与美国媒体的合作
美国媒体对特朗普的积极报道
特朗普对选举结果的关注
选举后释放保密协议的行为
检察官对特朗普行为的定性
选举影响与合谋指控
检察官与辩护方对证据的不同解读
法庭对特朗普言论的限制
特朗普可能违反法庭命令的行为
对特朗普违反法庭命令的潜在后果
法庭命令与特朗普的行为
陪审团的选择过程
特朗普对陪审团组成的评论
特朗普对审判过程的看法
陪审团与公众评论
法庭审判
Alert

Keywords

💡法庭审判

法庭审判是指在法院进行的正式审理程序,它是司法程序的核心部分,涉及案件的开庭陈述、证据呈现、辩论以及最终的裁决。在视频中,提到了曼哈顿的法庭审判,这是关于美国前总统的首次刑事审判,突显了司法公正和法律程序的重要性。

💡检察官

检察官是法律专业人士,负责在刑事案件中代表政府或社会公共利益提起公诉,并在法庭上提出证据以证明被告的有罪。视频中提到了检察官Matthew Colangelo,他在法庭上陈述案件,试图证明前总统涉及的刑事行为。

💡证人

证人是在法庭上提供关于案件事实信息的人,他们的证词对于案件的判决具有重要影响。David Packer作为前美国媒体公司的CEO,在视频中作为证人出现,他的证词涉及了与案件相关的财务交易和协议。

💡非披露协议

非披露协议(NDA)是一种法律合同,要求签署方对某些信息保密。在视频中,提到了与Stormy Daniels有关的非披露协议,这与前总统涉嫌的支付封口费有关,是案件的关键证据之一。

💡刑事辩护律师

刑事辩护律师是专门在刑事案件中为被告提供法律援助的律师,他们的职责是保护被告的法律权利并为其辩护。视频中Todd Blanche作为前总统的辩护律师,他在法庭上为前总统进行辩护,并试图质疑检方的论点。

💡审判程序

审判程序指的是法庭审理案件的正式流程,包括开庭、证据提交、证人作证、辩论、裁决等步骤。视频中详细描述了审判程序中的一些环节,如证人的宣誓、证词的听取以及辩护律师和检察官之间的互动。

💡政治历史

政治历史是指与政治事件、政治人物和政治制度发展相关的历史。视频中提到了这次审判是美国政治历史上的一个标志性事件,因为它涉及到前总统的刑事指控,这在美国历史上是前所未有的。

💡选举阴谋

选举阴谋指的是为了影响选举结果而进行的非法或不道德的行为。在视频中,检察官指控前总统参与了一个旨在影响2016年总统选举结果的长期阴谋,这包括支付封口费和其他非法支出。

💡藐视法庭

藐视法庭是指不遵守法庭规则或不尊重法庭权威的行为,可能会导致法律后果,如罚款或监禁。视频中提到了前总统可能违反了禁止对证人和陪审团成员发表公开评论的禁言令,这可能构成藐视法庭。

💡国家询问报

国家询问报(National Enquirer)是一家美国的超市小报,以其八卦新闻和有时夸大或未经证实的报道而闻名。视频中提到了该报纸在2016年总统选举期间对前总统的支持,以及它在所谓的选举阴谋中的角色。

💡封口费

封口费是指为了确保某人对某事保持沉默而支付的款项。在视频中,前总统被指控支付封口费给Stormy Daniels,以防止她在选举前公开讨论与前总统的所谓婚外情。

Highlights

法庭上,前总统唐纳德·特朗普看起来比以往老了许多,似乎很不高兴。

法庭描述为简朴,不大,光线不佳,且在场的人都很紧张。

记者无意中在法庭上笑出声,因为听到了检察官马修·科朗吉洛的陈述。

检察官展示了特朗普组织首席财务官艾伦·魏塞尔伯格关于掩盖支付给斯托米·丹尼尔斯的款项的手写笔记。

检察官声称特朗普批准了支付给迈克尔·科恩的420万美元,以掩盖130,000美元的斯托米·丹尼尔斯款项和其他费用。

特朗普被描述为一个非常节俭的商人,但在支付科恩的款项时没有讨价还价,反而增加了金额,以将其伪装成收入。

辩护方利用相同的事实向陪审团提出了相反的观点,称特朗普非常吝啬,所以支付的款项一定是为了其他原因,而非科恩支付给斯托米·丹尼尔斯的款项。

前FBI总法律顾问安德鲁·魏斯曼和前助理地区检察官凯瑟琳·克里斯蒂安作为嘉宾,讨论了法庭上的关键证据和策略。

检察官引用了录音证据,其中特朗普被无意中听到提出用现金支付130,000美元。

检察官提到了电话记录,显示迈克尔·科恩和唐纳德·特朗普之间的交流。

辩护方可能会强调特朗普作为前总统的身份,并试图将每个行为描述为无辜。

检察官马修·科朗吉洛声称,特朗普和美国媒体之间有一个犯罪阴谋,目的是发布关于特朗普的正面故事并压制负面故事。

检察官将展示证据,证明在选举结束后,那些被支付封口费的人被释放了他们的保密协议。

辩护方可能会争辩说,这些支付与选举无关,特朗普只是为法律服务支付了科恩。

法庭上出现了多次反对,特朗普的律师托德·布兰奇在开场陈述中多次被打断。

法官可能会就特朗普违反禁止对潜在证人或陪审团成员发表公开声明的命令举行听证会。

如果特朗普被判藐视法庭,可能会被处以每天最多1000美元的罚款,或者最长30天的监禁。

特朗普在采访中讨论了他的审判陪审团,声称陪审团中有95%是民主党人,他认为这是一个非常不公平的情况。

Transcripts

00:01

i was at the courthouse today in manhattan i was in

00:02

the courtroom for opening statements for this first

00:06

criminal trial of former president i can report first

00:08

hand that the court room smells like old suit and stale breath

00:14

haha i can report that the police officers who police the

00:17

courtroom are working very hard and they appear to be very

00:20

stressed

00:21

i can report that judge moore shot is soft-spoken and has

00:25

what i think would be universally considered to be a

00:28

pleasant voice i can report that prosecutor matthew

00:31

colangelo speaks exactly like seth meyers speaks when seth

00:35

meyers is not telling jokes i can tell you that the first

00:39

witness david packer accidentally gave out his whole

00:42

phone number today when the prosecutor just asked him to

00:45

confirm the last four digits he was trying to remember the

00:48

last four digits and in order to get there in his head

00:50

he said the whole number out loud and loops didn't mean to

00:53

do that i can report that former president donald trump

00:57

looks a lot older than he used to

01:00

and that it seems to me and my subjective take that he knew

01:05

he seemed miserable to be but you know

01:08

i look a lot older than that used and i think anybody's got

01:12

a right to look miserable when they're sitting in a courtroom

01:14

charged with dozens of felonies at it as a criminal defendant

01:18

the courtroom is bare bones it is not large it is an

01:23

elegant it has an flattering lighting like i said it does

01:27

not smell good and everybody is very tense

01:31

what i mean to present to you with all of this information

01:35

is that given the choice nobody would want to be there

01:39

except of course journalists and reporters covering the most

01:42

historic trial in american political history

01:45

to that end

01:47

i'd also like to say that i'm sorry to the journalists who

01:50

are sitting immediately next to me

01:52

because i unintentionally snorted out loud and went to

01:56

when this happens today at the trial and when i read this

01:59

part of the transcript to you well know why i said

02:03

prosecutor matthew cole angela

02:05

in january twenty seventeen before the defendant move down

02:08

to washington to begin his presidency michael cohen met

02:12

with allen weisselberg the trump organization to talk

02:15

about how cohen was going to get reimbursed for the payoff

02:18

to stormy daniels weisselberg you'll remember was the trump

02:21

organization chief financial officer and he was one of the

02:24

defendants longest-serving and most trusted employees neither

02:27

trump nor the trump organization can just write a

02:30

check to michael cohen for a hundred and thirty thousand

02:32

dollars with a memo line that said reimbursement for porn

02:36

star pay off

02:38

they had to disguise the nature of the repayment so they agreed

02:41

to cook the books and make it look like the repayment was

02:44

actually income

02:46

payments for services rendered instead of a reimbursement

02:49

allen weisselberg ask mister cohen to bring a copy of a bank

02:53

statement showing the hundred and thirty thousand dollars

02:55

payment that cohen had made to keep stormy daniels quiet

02:58

before the election weisselberg and cohen agreed to

03:01

a total repayment amount of four hundred twenty thousand

03:03

dollars

03:04

here is how they got to that number

03:07

this is good

03:09

they started with a hundred and thirty thousand dollars that

03:11

trump owed cohen for the stormy daniels payoff then they added

03:16

fifty thousand dollars for a separate reimbursement cohen

03:19

was claiming which had to do with tax services he paid for

03:22

during the campaign that adds up to a hundred and eighty

03:26

then they agreed to double that amount to three hundred

03:28

sixty thousand dollars to account for taxes

03:32

now of course if trump was just reimbursing cohen there

03:35

was no need to grow set up for taxes they double that because

03:38

their plan was to call it income instead of a

03:40

reimbursement if cohen was getting money they were

03:43

calling income he would have to pay taxes on it cohen was

03:46

close to a fifty percent tax bracket so to make him whole

03:49

on the hundred and eight hundred and eighty thousand

03:51

dollars that the defendant owed him they had to double the

03:53

amount to three hundred sixty then he added another sixty

03:58

thousand dollars as a year-end bonus and all of that comes

04:01

out to a total of four hundred twenty thousand dollars

04:05

and allen weisselberg wrote all of that down

04:10

for a fine i annoyed the people sitting near me because

04:12

i snorted outloud said

04:14

he wrote it all down

04:16

if you're a fan of the wire this is the scene where

04:19

stringer bell turns to the young man and says are you

04:22

taking notes on a criminal conspiracy using a lot of swear

04:25

words

04:27

yes yes he was taking notes on a criminal conspiracy

04:31

prosecutor mike off that's your call angela allen

04:33

weisselberg wrote all of that down

04:38

the the hurricane you begin to believe this is real the bank

04:42

statement that i told you about that he asked cohen to bring

04:45

to their meeting the bank statement from the essential

04:47

consultants account which show the hundred and thirty thousand

04:50

dollar wire that cohen had made to keith davidson to keep

04:53

stormy daniels quiet you will see in this trial allen

04:56

weisselberg's handwriting down the side of that bank statement

05:00

laying out every one of the steps that i just described

05:03

showing how they converted the hundred and thirty thousand

05:05

dollars payoff them out to the four hundred twenty graham

05:07

cohen was going to get paid back as they grow step way to

05:10

disguise it not as reimbursement but as income

05:13

and they took notes about it every step of the way and the

05:16

prosecution has the notes

05:19

and then here's the kicker

05:21

magical angela prosecutor quote colin weisselberg been

05:24

met with trump who approved the repayment amount of four

05:26

hundred twenty grand on the hundred and thirty thousand

05:29

dollars stormy daniels payment and a few other expenses

05:31

now you will see evidence at trial that trump was a very

05:34

frugal businessman

05:37

he believed in pinching pennies he believed in

05:39

watching every dollar he believed in negotiating every

05:41

bill it's all over all of the books he's written here on the

05:44

trump organization with total control you will hear

05:46

testimony about his relentless focus on the bottom line

05:49

but when it came time to pay michael cohen back for the

05:51

catch and kill deal you will see that he didn't negotiate

05:54

the price down he doubled it and he doubled it so they could

05:58

disguise it as income and you will hear evidence that the

06:00

trump organization was not in the practice of paying people

06:03

twice what they owed for anything this might be the

06:06

only time that ever happens and trump's willingness to do

06:10

so here shows just how important it was to him to hide

06:13

the true nature of cohen's illegal payment to miss daniels

06:16

and the overall election conspiracy that they had

06:19

launched in august twenty fifteen

06:22

prosecutors saying trump is paying a lot for this and he

06:25

never pays for anything that's how important and

06:28

sensitive this was

06:30

interestingly

06:32

moments later the defense used this same set of facts to make

06:36

the opposite point to the jury saying yeah trump really is

06:39

so cheap and so unwilling to pay for anything so

06:44

this must have been some other thing he was paying for

06:47

not the thing they have handwritten notes from his cfo

06:51

about

06:52

joining us now is former fbi general counsel andrew

06:54

weissmann also with us former assistant district attorney in

06:57

the manhattan district attorney's office katherine

06:59

christian author andrew thank you both for being here

07:03

andrew let me ask you first was stringer bell right to ask

07:06

allen west where are you taking notes on a criminal

07:09

conspiracy is this document potentially important east

07:12

so you might have seen by now it's because that is

07:16

started that was the page i had the same reaction

07:21

so one of things that you listen for when you listen to

07:25

openings on both sides is you know that they're witnesses are

07:29

going to testify do you think about how they're going to jay

07:31

whether they have memory issues whether they have

07:33

credibility issues but then you look for what is the

07:36

prosecution going to say with the spectrum with so-called

07:39

hard evidence and they're the things that stood out to me was

07:43

you had a reference to the tape recording that we've heard

07:46

about that's where donald trump is overheard saying

07:49

hey let's just pay the hundred thirty thousand in cash

07:52

that's that's a terrible tape for donald trump seconds

07:56

there was references to telephone records at a critical

07:59

time that the payments were first made by michael kahn

08:04

ju stormy daniels were there to cause that the prosecutor

08:09

referenced between michael cohen and donald trump and

08:13

then the third was this which is definitely a fall off your

08:16

chair moment where they have it in writing and what's so

08:21

interesting is that the defense said the repayment was not

08:27

repeat it was not reimbursement for the payments

08:30

to stormy daniels i do not know how they're going to deal

08:34

with that when you have these notes and remember when you

08:37

make a promise when you say something and openings as

08:41

catherine as kate in years that comes back to haunt you

08:45

if you have over promised if you've made a misstatement that

08:49

both sides are listening for that because they're going to

08:51

bring it up again in closing catherine is it is important

08:55

here that we don't expect allen weisselberg himself to be a

08:59

witness to potentially you know walked the jury through

09:02

what his notes matt and and explain this document that is

09:06

otherwise it's sort of a fall off your chair moment like

09:08

andrew said well it's a good thing since he's serving time

09:11

for perjury

09:13

so neither side wants him as a witness so it's it's very

09:18

good for the prosecution because they can just have the

09:20

notes and obviously donald trump doesn't want a perjurer

09:23

testify on his behalf so that's a good thing but i

09:26

agree with with andrew this is tucker operation when you talk

09:30

about michael cohen in his baggage this is where you have

09:34

cropper shun of his statement so there's no way the manhattan

09:38

da's office would have just relied on michael cohen's

09:41

testimony if they did not have corroborating documents

09:44

corroborating witnesses

09:47

now as lawrence o'donnell just mention today was the

09:50

first time that we've heard from the defense be heard from

09:53

the prosecution in effect with the indictment with the

09:58

announcement of charges that led to today's proceedings

10:01

but this is the first time we got to see the defense go

10:04

through their paces for the defense counsel for former

10:07

president trump we did get a sense and they're opening

10:10

statements today about how it looks like they're going to try

10:12

to defend their client if today's opening statements are

10:15

any guide they're going to stress that mister trump is a

10:19

former presidents and they're going to always call him

10:22

president trump they're going to stress beyond that that he

10:25

right now is the presumptive republican nominee for

10:28

president again or as his defense counsel called him

10:31

today the republican nominee not even presumptive they're

10:35

going to claim that every aspect of this was an innocent

10:39

act by trump that there wasn't an underlying sexual encounter

10:42

to cover up even though that would seem to be immaterial to

10:45

the charges they will seem to be claiming again of today's

10:48

opening statements are any guide that michael cohen

10:51

trump's lawyer paid a porn star on his own accord and for his

10:56

own reasons that trump only paid michael cohen for legal

11:00

services just like he always had he just changed to a weird

11:04

new way of paying him after the porn star thing because

11:07

well they'll think of something

11:10

but if you are in this defense team if you are in charge of

11:13

coming up with the defense for mister trump

11:16

here's the part of the prosecution's case that would

11:19

seem to be the most difficult thing to explain logically

11:23

if you're really going to try to mount a defense that trump

11:25

did nothing at all wrong that there was no conspiracy to

11:29

corrupt the election as the prosecution put it at the top

11:32

of their opening statements today well this would seem to

11:35

be

11:36

the toughest thing logically that you're up against here it

11:40

is this is from the opening statement from prosecutor

11:42

matthew collection clanzel quote

11:47

now at this sorry this is not going to forgive me this is

11:49

the introduction at this point colangelo has explained to the

11:52

jury that there was what he called a criminal conspiracy

11:55

between trump and am i american media to publish positive

11:59

stories about trump to publish negative stories about trump's

12:01

rivals to find negative stories about trump that hadn't been

12:05

published yet and then too hey the sources of the stories

12:09

to make them shut up and not tell anybody about the stories

12:11

before the election so the prosecution has explained to

12:15

the jury at this point that my american media national

12:18

enquirer they first found a doorman door man named dean

12:23

dinos to judon who said that trump had fathered a secret

12:26

child with a housekeeper so june was the first one that

12:29

am i paid to keep quiet about his story and was the second

12:33

one woman and karen mcdougal who said she had an affair with

12:36

trump they paid her to not tell anybody about that story

12:40

as well that there was the third one stormy daniels

12:42

and although this point the enquirer was still willing to

12:46

make arrangements for her to be paid to be quiet about that

12:49

story by that point they were not ready to put up additional

12:52

money and so michael cohen put up the money for that so the

12:57

prosecutors explained all this to the jury and then he says

13:00

this prosecutor matthew clanzel

13:03

cohen made that pay minute donald trump's direction and

13:05

for his benefit and he did it with a specific goal of

13:08

influencing the outcome of the election now look no

13:11

politician wants bad press but the evidence at trial will show

13:15

that this was not spend our communications strategy

13:18

this was a planned coordinated long-running conspiracy to

13:21

influence the twenty sixteen election to help donald trump

13:23

get elected through illegal expenditures to silence people

13:27

who had something bad to say about his behavior using

13:29

doctored corporate records and bank forms to conceal those

13:33

payments along the way it was election fraud pure and

13:37

simple we will never know and it doesn't matter if this

13:40

conspiracy was the difference maker in a close election

13:44

but you will see evidence in the defendant's own words from

13:48

his social media posts from the speeches at campaign rallies

13:51

and other events you will see in his own words making crystal

13:54

clear that he was certainly concerned about how all of this

13:57

could hurt his standing with voters and with female voters

14:00

in particular you will also see evidence that on election

14:03

night

14:04

as news outlets got closer to calling the election for donald

14:07

trump the lawyer for both stormy daniels and karen

14:10

mcdougal tech student dylan howard editor at the national

14:14

fire and he said quote

14:15

what have we done

14:19

about a month after the election david packard

14:21

the ceo of american media then authorize am i to release both

14:26

dinos issued and the doorman and karen mcdougal from their

14:31

non-disclosure agreements

14:34

say that again about a month after the election packer

14:37

authorize am i to release the first two recipients of catch

14:42

and kill money

14:43

release them from their non-disclosure agreements

14:46

once the election is over colangelo quote so having paid

14:49

for the stories in order to keep them from the public

14:51

before election day packer in a i then told both that google

14:55

and student a month after the election that they were no

14:57

longer bound by the nondisclosure agreements

15:02

just think about what that means this claim right from

15:05

the from the defense is that none of these payments game

15:08

said anything to do with the election to knows what michael

15:11

cohen was doing paying that porn star donald trump was

15:13

just paying for legal fees right that the defense is

15:16

saying said nothing to do with the election the prosecution

15:18

says they will present evidence that trump american media paid

15:22

for all of these people to be silent until the election was

15:26

over

15:28

and then once the election was over they then released all

15:30

these people from these agreements to be silent because

15:33

once the election happened they didn't care anymore

15:35

because at that point mission accomplished because the

15:39

mission was to influence the election

15:42

and so once the election was done there's no more need for

15:44

these agreements

15:46

the mission was the election the mission was not to protect

15:50

his brand

15:51

the mission wasn't to save his family embarrassment it was to

15:55

keep these people silent to pay them to be silent specifically

15:59

and only

16:00

in order to win the election full stop

16:04

prosecution calls this a criminal scheme to corrupt the

16:08

twenty sixteen presidential election one that was covered

16:10

up by lying in this business records

16:14

logically that hole releasing people from the agreements once

16:18

the election was over logically that would seem to

16:21

be

16:22

the crux of this case if the prosecution can prove it

16:26

legally though will safe lots

16:29

so rachel it here we arrive at the different burdens

16:32

of prosecution and defense the prosecution is going for

16:36

logic and you are following their logic and their lodger

16:40

takes you over to the national enquirer and it takes you over

16:44

to this guy who said told require that you know trump

16:48

fathered a child that that turns out not to be true ever

16:50

in the courtroom agrees but that wasn't true and then

16:54

it takes you over to karen mcdougal and those are the two

16:57

who are released from their confidentiality agreement after

17:00

the election and what the defense is going to say in

17:02

final argument is

17:04

that has nothing to do with this case absolutely nothing

17:10

because remember what the defense needs in final argument

17:13

is not logic they're not trying to take you through a

17:16

flawlessly logical story they're just trying to target

17:20

any little do they can find any where and they will lane in

17:26

final argument on that agreement in that courtroom

17:31

that that guy who said that holding choir that donald

17:34

trump diligently for father child was not telling the

17:37

truth wasn't telling the truth just like stormy daniels

17:40

wasn't telling the truth about donald trump and donald trump

17:43

gets hustle by these people all the time and we have to deal

17:46

with them in different ways donald trump has said publicly

17:49

this happens to

17:50

every man every man

17:53

clued you chris a sitting at this table every man whose

17:57

public every man who is in the public eye is constantly paying

18:02

off tens of thousands hundreds of thousands of these deals all

18:06

the time that stall trump's claim right and he's going to

18:08

say you know this is happening to me all the time

18:11

and and and all of that macdougal stuff

18:13

everything involving packer everything involvement choir is

18:17

going to be thrown out the door in the final argument of donald

18:21

trump's defense lawyers because none of that is a charged

18:23

crime not a single thing in any of that it's these

18:27

business records and the other piece of the defense that we

18:30

heard today about the business records is

18:32

this is the name of the woman who made up you know the

18:36

checks this is the name of the book keeper centered on the

18:39

record who filled out the forms this is the name of the

18:42

person who told her to say legal services and donald trump

18:46

never told any of them to say legal services

18:50

that's the defense donald trump didn't tell them to keep

18:53

the books this way and the money oh by the way was not

18:57

for having anything to do with stormy daniels says the entire

19:00

defense there's no other piece of that fence and it has

19:02

nothing to do with other people's home nondisclosure

19:07

agreements and all that stuff and and of course all that

19:11

stuff makes perfect sense when the prosecution is building you

19:15

this flawless table that has logical for logical legs to it

19:20

and defense is going to come along and say no it has no

19:23

legs the table has no life

19:26

you know we released all these people from these

19:28

agreements after the election because we love late november

19:35

release of their merry christmas is a time that

19:37

they're going to feel no need to offense will feel no need to

19:41

explain why those nondisclosure agreements are no longer in

19:45

four small they will have any need to wear in their final

19:47

argument don't throw something out there in the course of the

19:50

trial but that they won't feel compelled to explore what

19:52

you're talking about about that the claim of from dino

19:56

the dorm and being a false claim

19:58

what am i nevertheless agreed to pay for it and what

20:02

michael cohen was paid and how they arrived at that out

20:06

was the star your coffee out your nose in the courtroom

20:09

moment today we're going to talk about that including with

20:12

andrew weissmann and catherine christians were here you are

20:16

good at keeping us keeping us on the on the legal straight

20:18

narrow as we as we proceed with our primetime recap

20:22

today's criminal proceedings against former president donald

20:25

trump

20:37

okay questions from the prosecutor

20:40

so a ceo and president and chairman did you have the

20:43

final say over publishing decisions including which

20:46

stories would get published and which stories would not get

20:49

published answer from david packer former ceo of american

20:53

media yes i have the final say

20:56

on the celebrity side of the magazine industry at least on

20:59

the tabloid side we used checkbook journalism and we pay

21:03

for stories so i gave a number to the editors that they could

21:06

not spend more than ten thousand dollars to investigate

21:10

or produce are published a story so anything over ten

21:13

thousand dollars that they would spend on a story that

21:15

would have to be vetted and brought up to me if they were

21:18

going to spend more for approval question prosecutor in

21:22

addition to having to approve expenditures did you also have

21:25

final kind of editorial say in other words the ability to

21:29

determine that a particular story was not going to be run

21:32

or a particular story was going to be run answer david packer

21:35

being in the publishing industry for forty years

21:38

i realized early in my career that the only thing that was

21:41

important is the cover of a magazine so when the editors

21:45

produce a story are prepared to cover would have a meeting and

21:47

they were presented with the story would be with the concept

21:49

was what the cost is going to be question prosecutor and if

21:53

the story involves a guess for lack of a better way to say it

21:56

a big story or famous person did you have the final say on

22:00

whether or not to publish that story answer david pecker's

22:03

yes i did

22:05

the first witness in the criminal trial of former

22:08

president donald trump today was david packer the former

22:11

ceo of american media inc am i which is the company that

22:15

used to on the national enquirer now two salient

22:19

point here about that testimony from david packer is only on

22:22

the stand for like half an hour today but we get all of this

22:24

very salient stuff for the prosecution's case

22:28

first of all there's there's what he said about what counts

22:31

as a normal amount of money for the kind of checkbook

22:35

journalism that he says his company dots anything over ten

22:38

thousand dollars

22:40

that would be unusual that would be sort of out of bounds

22:42

that would have to get personal approval from him as the

22:46

chairman president and ceo of not just one of these

22:49

publications but the entire company with dozens of

22:52

publications ten grand was the ceiling beyond that it had to

22:55

go personally through him

22:58

but in this case prosecutors say they will present evidence

23:02

that am i was doing something and a whole other league when

23:05

it came to what they were doing for trump for example before

23:08

even investigating a trump property door man's claim about

23:12

trump supposedly fathering a secret child with a

23:15

housekeeper they paid that man thirty thousand dollars

23:19

they paid the man making the claim thirty thousand dollars

23:22

to make him be quiet about it before they even investigated

23:26

whether it might be true

23:28

triple what is their normal limit for having to go to the

23:32

ceo

23:34

also the claim about the affair with trump from former playboy

23:38

playmate karen mcdougal they paid her a hundred and

23:41

fifty thousand dollars which was fifteen times their limit

23:46

for going to the ceo and appears to have been way beyond

23:49

what they were paying anybody else for anything

23:53

prosecutor matthew clincial close after consulting with

23:56

cohen parker directed his editor in chief at the national

23:59

enquirer to negotiate an agreement to pay thirty

24:02

thousand dollars to the doorman to buy exclusive rights to that

24:06

story the evidence will show that packer was not acting as a

24:09

publisher he was acting as a co-conspirator

24:12

the evidence will show that this was a highly unusual deal

24:16

even for tabloid journalism it was a lot more money than

24:19

they would usually paid to a source

24:21

they bought the doorman story without even fully

24:24

investigating it was the first time david packer had never

24:27

paid anyone for information about donald trump

24:30

packard directed that the deal take place because of the

24:33

agreement he had reached a because he had promised trump

24:35

at the trump tower meeting in august twenty fifteen that he

24:38

would use his media empire to help the defendants campaigns

24:42

and they knew that public disclosure of the door man's

24:44

information would hurt that campaign

24:48

what prosecutors laid out today and what the witness help them

24:52

prove today is that the practices described here in

24:56

this alleged criminal conspiracy we're not at all

24:58

normal not even for tabloid check but journalism that pays

25:03

for stories and even for american media specifically and

25:07

the national enquirer specifically this is not their

25:10

back this is not part of what they do as a magazine

25:14

this is part of what they do as an alleged criminal conspiracy

25:18

with donald trump to illegally influence the election

25:22

so that's one

25:23

the second and final part about this david packer testimony

25:26

that is perhaps alien to the overall case here is the part

25:30

where he says that the quote only thing that's important is

25:34

the cover it's a magazine

25:39

stepping back from just the legal fight here

25:42

if this was a criminal conspiracy to influence the

25:44

election

25:46

how much influence we talking about here

25:49

in terms of how much influence this alleged criminal

25:51

conspiracy could have had on the election

25:54

how influential is the national enquirer all right i mean

25:57

the national enquirer only reportedly has about a hundred

26:00

and fifty thousand two hundred thousand copies sold nationwide

26:04

in a week these days

26:06

but the covers covers of the only thing that matters

26:10

they have their covers in the face of everyone who shops in

26:15

the mainstream grocery store anywhere in america in all

26:17

fifty states the cover of the national enquirer per david

26:21

packer the only thing that matters that covers of time

26:24

magazine from the time of this alleged criminal conspiracy

26:27

with trump

26:29

covers that were in your face in every supermarket in the

26:32

country week after week and for months on end looked like this

26:38

trump why i am the only choice for president

26:42

the donald trump nobody knows the babes and bucks the real

26:48

reason he hates obama and the clintons this one has a

26:51

special place in my heart

26:53

putin picks trump for president

26:57

this one how trump will win

26:59

or following how trump will win the debate also hillary's

27:03

nephew was in the klan

27:06

trump takes charge also bill clinton his diet

27:11

and hillary is dying haha areas

27:16

corrupt that was not clear enough just as corrupt as one

27:20

big word also hillary will never be president and this was

27:24

their election eve bombshell edition

27:27

just make sure you had all the bases here hillary corrupt

27:30

faces criminal

27:33

before twenty sixteen the national enquirer never-before

27:37

endorsed a presidential candidate

27:41

all right this is what they did in twenty sixteen when they

27:43

did those covers they were doing something very different

27:47

with donald trump the man ever done with any politician before

27:50

something that was in the face of every person who ever walked

27:55

up to the little conveyor belt thing at a supermarket checkout

27:58

line anywhere in america any time during the duration of

28:01

the alleged conspiracy which was the duration of the twenty

28:04

sixteen campaign whether or not you ever picked up that

28:07

magazine let alone opened it past the cover this

28:11

propaganda which was the product of this allegedly

28:14

illegal campaign scheme was in the face of

28:19

likely if not tens of millions of americans perhaps

28:23

more than a hundred million americans how many of us go to

28:26

a grocery store

28:28

this was strictly a strange out of character first time ever

28:32

arrangement they made but this one candidate with trump that

28:35

prosecutors today in their opening statement said was a

28:37

criminal scheme to corrupt the twenty sixteen presidential

28:40

election criminal scheme that was hatched in a trump tower

28:43

meeting just a few weeks after he announced his candidacy for

28:46

president

28:49

a criminal scheme which ultimately landed him in

28:51

criminal court today as the first-ever us president to be a

28:54

defendant in a criminal trial when you cover up of that

28:57

alleged criminal conspiracy which charged as a string of

29:00

thirty four felonies and new york state

29:04

trump's lawyer defense council dot todd blanche was in the

29:07

middle of his opening statements today when something

29:09

unusual happened todd blanche trump defense council quote

29:13

michael cohen paying stormy daniels or stephanie clifford

29:16

a hundred and thirty thousand dollars in exchange for her

29:19

green to not publicly spread false false claims about

29:23

president trump it is not illegal i'm going to say that

29:26

again entering into a nondisclosure agreement

29:29

prosecutor objection judge sustained

29:34

mister blanche entering into a nondisclosure agreement is

29:37

perfectly legal prosecution objection the judge overruled

29:44

mister thompson continues on for a moment then it happens

29:46

again pretty much right away todd blanche when miss daniels

29:49

threatened to go public with her false claim of a sexual

29:51

encounter with president trump back in two thousand eight

29:54

that it was as the people just said very close to the

29:56

election and it was almost an attempt by ms clifford ms

29:59

daniels to extort president trump prosecutor objection

30:03

judge sustains

30:06

lance then tries to keep going but then a moment later

30:10

mister blanche again entering into an agreement with another

30:12

individual you'll hear this agreement was negotiated by

30:15

lawyers prosecutor objection

30:18

now at this point judge for sean does not even rule on the

30:21

objection doesn't say sustain doesn't say overruled instead

30:24

calls lawyers from both sides up to the bench please

30:28

approach

30:30

lawyers and the judge then confer and then the judge

30:33

rules judge the objection is the state

30:36

still mister blanched trump's lawyer moves on to another

30:39

topic

30:40

but it makes it just three further pages into the

30:42

transcript and the whole thing starts all over again this time

30:45

it's over a mention of michael cohen todd blanche trump's

30:47

defense council quote separately from his obsession

30:50

with president trump has obsession get president trump

30:52

on multiple occasions michael cohen has testified under oath

30:55

and lied prosecutor objection the judge sustained

30:59

blanche he walked his he's walked into a courtroom very

31:03

near here raised his right hand and swore to tell the

31:05

truth and now he will tell you i expect that he was

31:08

lying prosecutor objection judge sustained

31:13

and for a second time the judge calls up the lawyers for

31:16

both sides to the bench to the best counsel please approach

31:19

and a second time he upholds the objection

31:22

the judge was shot the objection is the state

31:27

i was in the court when the string of objections happened

31:30

in the middle of trump's teams opening statements both sides

31:34

getting repeatedly hauled up before the judge that report

31:37

or excuse me the lawyer having to restart what he was saying

31:39

try to find his momentum again pick back up

31:42

to me as a lay person it seemed dramatic and strange

31:46

but i want to ask our lawyers here how rare is it for

31:48

objections to be made during opening statements how rare is

31:52

it for the judge to interrupt opening statements with

31:54

multiple directions to the lawyers including the one

31:58

making the opening statement they got to come up with a

31:59

mention doctor the judge

32:01

why are these objections made what does this tell us about

32:03

the trial and about the defense that trump's lawyer is trying

32:06

to make luckily joining us now is lisa rubin who was at

32:09

the courthouse today in the overflow room lisa i

32:11

understand that part of your sacrifice today was allowing me

32:14

to be in the courtroom in a seat that you might otherwise

32:16

have had your butt in so as not to attack a fight i'm very

32:19

grateful and i here by the creek back to yeah

32:25

you actually in some ways in the office of overflow or might

32:27

have a slightly better view of this than i did sitting at the

32:30

back of the courtroom watching it started down the aisle

32:32

what was happening there at how weird was it

32:35

so it was weird not just because there was one

32:37

objection but because of how many there were relative to the

32:41

brevity of todd lunches opening statement let's start

32:44

with the fact that tub lynch was an experienced prosecutor

32:47

and the southern district of new york but what he's not is

32:49

an experienced defense lawyer we learned today from new york

32:52

magazine something that confirms something that i

32:54

suspected which is that tomblin just right exactly one

32:57

trial as defense counsel and the last decade and on a fairly

33:01

narrow issue and if you were just in that courtroom he

33:04

probably would have expected as much because he's flow was

33:07

interrupted so many times by these frequent objections and

33:10

the side bars now that having been said rachel i think a

33:14

number of the things that he did today where perfectly

33:17

intentional because while they were objected to in the

33:19

objections were sustained he still planted the seeds of

33:22

doubt in the jurors minds and in particular for example

33:25

when he said that stormy daniels made donald trump a

33:29

victim of extortion that was immediately objected to in

33:31

sustained because that among other things is a legal

33:34

conclusion there was no prosecution for example

33:37

a stormy daniels for extorting

33:38

donald trump he would have known in advance the judge was

33:41

not going to allow them to get away with saying i think that's

33:43

probably right but there are other objections where he

33:46

definitely knew and i think the place where he definitely

33:49

knew was when he talked about what i'll call the diet advice

33:52

of counsel defense where he essentially said trump believed

33:56

that these nondisclosure agreements were totally kosher

33:59

because he had attorneys negotiating them for him

34:02

that's an issue that's already been litigated as part of the

34:04

party's motions in limon which are the advanced arguments

34:07

about what evidence can and can't come in todd blanche

34:10

near when he walked in the courtroom this morning that

34:12

that was not going to be an argument allowed because he was

34:15

trying to use the attorney client privilege as a sword and

34:18

a shield essentially saying my client relied on lawyers

34:21

advice but we're not going to tell you what that advice was

34:24

and just like judge kaplan did in the sam bankman-fried case

34:27

in fact just richaun cited that ruling in making his own

34:31

i'm not going to let your client do that there is no

34:33

advice of counsel light and yet that's where plants stolen

34:37

i'm going to give an instruction now that nobody

34:40

knows is coming and i know it's going make everybody move

34:42

around i'd like to talk to katherine christian effect

34:45

she's on the side of the room and lots of cameras after move

34:47

directly to make this possible hi catherine thank you

34:50

you have experience in the new york new york district

34:53

attorney's office the the what what what lisa's describing

34:57

hear about about mister bush's relative inexperience doing

35:01

this kind of lawyering and this kind of a case is one piece of

35:05

perspective here another piece of perspective here is what's

35:08

normal and new york the criminal proceeding like this

35:12

when these interruptions these objections happened during the

35:16

opening statements here from the defense how did that

35:19

strike you

35:21

it's not unusual andrew and i will probably have a

35:23

different experience new york state court is not his day t as

35:26

federal court so it's not shocking end defense attorney

35:30

some of them pride themselves on stepping on the line

35:34

so you know i have jack when i was a prosecutor because they

35:38

stepped on the line and as lisa said

35:41

hoops see the jury heard what he said so it's in their

35:45

head so this i can't say it happens all the time but it's

35:49

not shocking i rarely objective as a prosecutor

35:52

because i didn't want the jury to think that i was trying to

35:55

hide something from the marks of freight here i would have

35:58

objected because he was clearly saying things he shouldn't even

36:00

the judge already ruled against but it's not shocking

36:03

at least not in the world of a hundred center street in new

36:06

york

36:07

county and copper let me ask about something k frank

36:09

said earlier where she said that you know in the minds of

36:12

the jury mister branch might have not done himself a verse

36:17

with all of those the statements being objected to

36:19

today all those interruptions because the jury might have

36:22

thought even if the seeds were planted in their minds by

36:24

things he wasn't supposed to say that he nevertheless of

36:26

them here they at least would think that he was doing

36:29

something wrong by being essentially surf many

36:32

sanctioned by the judge in that way and and interrupted in a

36:35

slow

36:36

now in the judge instructed the jury about objections and

36:38

not to take them against the the the defense attorney

36:41

the prosecutor i have heard acquitting juries talk about

36:47

how they liked how that defense attorney really fought for

36:50

their client so i don't think you could read into is sustain

36:55

the jury is going to think very bad i think as lisa just said

36:58

there was a tactic

37:00

he knew that these for objection things he was saying

37:04

and they were objected to but it already you can ring the

37:07

bell is what usually say it came out to the jury and

37:10

prosecutors cannot appeal an acquittal

37:15

so under an order imposed by the court in this criminal

37:19

case donald trump is not allowed to make or direct

37:23

others to make public statements about known or

37:27

reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their

37:29

potential participation in the investigation or in this

37:32

criminal proceeding is not allowed to do that the

37:36

prosecution is now arguing that trump has done that a lot

37:41

it will be a hearing tomorrow morning at nine thirty

37:43

eastern before the jurors come into the courtroom prosecutors

37:46

are going to ask the judge to find that former president

37:49

trump willfully violated the gag order by attacking

37:52

well-known potential witnesses including stormy daniels and

37:54

michael cohen attacking the credibility on up to ten

37:57

separate occasions if the judge finds trump in criminal

38:02

contempt of court on these matters

38:05

trump could be fined up to a thousand dollars each for each

38:07

violation that's what prosecutors are asking for

38:10

he could possibly be sentenced to a maximum of thirty days in

38:13

jail of the prosecutors are certainly not asking for that

38:16

yet

38:18

i mean tonight trump sent around fundraising email called

38:22

my farewell message making it sound like he's definitely

38:25

going to jail

38:27

i already met to ask our legal experts about it but we just

38:30

cued up some new sound from donald trump today this is

38:33

from an interview on a conservative network called

38:37

real america's voice here it is donald trump talking about

38:40

the jury in his trial

38:44

that jury was picked so fast ninety-five percent

38:48

democrats the areas all mostly all democrat you think

38:52

of it as a just a purely democrat area it's a very

38:56

unfair situation that i can tell you

38:59

that jury ninety-five percent democrats again

39:02

the last item in the gag order forbids trump from making or

39:06

directing others to makes public statements about any

39:08

prospective juror are any juror in this criminal proceeding

39:14

andrew weissmann still with us here tonight the gag order has

39:19

been the discussion but i feel like we've had around the edges

39:22

of this case a lot because it's the way that trump has tried to

39:25

kind of shape the environment around this case it's going to

39:28

be in the courtroom front and center tomorrow morning at nine

39:31

thirty what do you expect judge were shot is going to do

39:34

what are you going to be watching for

39:36

so you have donald trump clearly coating the judge

39:41

he the fact that he's doing something that appears by all

39:44

accounts to be in direct violation the order has the

39:49

latest tonight and advance of a nine thirty hearing on

39:55

violations with respect to witnesses and a violation of

39:58

inspection jurors by the sun which are things that a judge

40:01

is going to care tremendously about you know i think the

40:07

you know i see is going hear from the defense and you

40:09

know the betting is that he's going to certainly say that

40:13

there was a violation and he can impose the fine that is

40:16

obviously negligible any can savor at all about what's next

40:22

this is one where what i would say hi or like if you are

40:26

seeing right here i would say leave aside pope politics

40:31

leave aside what he's going somebody to do

40:35

what would you do for any other defendant it we have seen

40:40

their legal system bend over shouldn't shofar to accommodate

40:45

donald trump he is he is not being treated worse he's being

40:49

treated show show much better weather turning back dear j

40:53

whether you're talking about all of the criminal cases and

40:56

this is one where he wouldn't have to impose thirty days in

41:00

jail but he can really j like a child give them a timeout

41:04

he can be step back and be kept in the pens in the courthouse

41:08

but i think this is so clearly like a child testing what will

41:11

happen and that's at the very outset of the case there isn't

41:16

a firm hand right now and the real allies imposed it really

41:21

is a terrible message in terms of how the trials going to go

41:24

forward because he's going to continue doing this at their

41:27

jersey doesn't like he can attack them if he's going to

41:31

try and seek mistrial pie by his antics that something could

41:34

try said the court which is extremely experienced i think

41:38

is going to have to be really careful about what exact as the

41:42

sanction has been imposed

41:44

how will the judge decide or how of the hearing on this go

41:48

again that's going to be the way that court starts tomorrow

41:51

is he going to ask defense is going to rule or is he going to

41:55

ask defense council and the prosecutors to make arguments

41:58

in front of him is he going to you know have a witness

42:00

talk

42:01

so he could asked both sides to state their position

42:05

he could see if there is a dispute the facts you could

42:09

actually have a hearing on this but there may not be

42:12

it's just get a facts and the facts seem so clear unless tom

42:16

trump's going to say somebody else took over my account

42:19

you know roger stone tried that one he was in violation

42:23

he actually took the witness stand and said i didn't see

42:26

that many later sort of a canton said okay i did do it

42:30

and yeah that was when he posted the judges picture with

42:33

cross hairs next her head and so there can be a hearing

42:39

but it may not be necessary just given the volume of

42:44

allegations here there's now i think up to eleven allegations

42:48

that are going to be before the judge but ultimately it would

42:52

be the state's burden to come forward