AN APP STOLE MY EDIT? trying out "vidos- photo music video editor"
TLDRIn this video, Lauren addresses an issue where an app called 'Veto's Photo Music Video Editor' allegedly used her editing work as a template without her permission. She expresses her surprise at the app's difficulty to find and its high rating. Lauren explores the app, testing its features and comparing the results with her own editing skills in Adobe After Effects. She also discusses the variety of templates available, questioning their originality and the possibility of the app stealing ideas from numerous creators. Despite not finding her specific edit, she engages with the app's interface and considers the potential for improvement with additional editing. Lauren concludes by reflecting on the app's marketing tactics and her role in inadvertently promoting it through her investigation.
Takeaways
- 📱 The video is about an app called 'Vido's Photo Music Video Editor' which allegedly uses Lauren's edit as a template without her permission.
- 📈 Lauren has received numerous messages from followers about the app using her project file, which she believes is being monetized without her consent.
- 🔍 Despite its high rating, the app was difficult for Lauren to find, which she found suspicious.
- 🎨 Lauren experimented with the app's editing features and tried to enhance the output with additional effects using Adobe After Effects.
- 🤔 She was unable to find her specific 'Her the Sun' template within the app, leading her to question the authenticity of the app's templates.
- 👀 Lauren noticed that the app's templates were in various styles, suggesting they might be sourcing from multiple creators without credit.
- 🚀 She expressed concern that the app might be capitalizing on the work of real people and not giving them proper recognition.
- 💭 The video also humorously critiques the app's aggressive advertising and promotional tactics, including unexpected 'free gift' ads.
- 🧐 Lauren's investigation into the app raises ethical questions about content creation, ownership, and the use of others' work in app development.
- 📹 The video serves as a cautionary tale for creators about protecting their intellectual property and being aware of how their work can be used online.
- 📢 Lauren invites viewers who have had similar experiences to comment and suggests a collective effort to seek justice for uncredited use of creative work.
Q & A
What is the main issue Lauren is addressing in the video?
-Lauren is addressing the issue that an app called 'vidos- photo music video editor' is allegedly using her edit as a template without her permission, potentially profiting from her work.
How did Lauren become aware of the app using her edit?
-Lauren became aware of the issue when she received numerous direct messages from followers informing her that a company was using her project file and claiming it as their own in their app.
What was Lauren's initial reaction to the app's interface?
-Lauren was surprised by the lack of cohesion in the app's 'For You' page and found the variety of styles confusing. She also noted the app's difficulty to find on the app store.
How did Lauren attempt to enhance the app's video output?
-Lauren saved the app's video output to her camera roll and then imported it into Adobe After Effects to add motion blur, coloring, borders, and a watermark to see if it could resemble a professional edit.
What was Lauren's opinion on the app's templates?
-Lauren felt that some of the app's templates were creatively designed, possibly by real people, but she was critical of the app for not giving credit to the original creators of the transitions.
Did Lauren find her specific edit that was allegedly used by the app?
-Despite her search, Lauren did not find her specific 'Her the Sun' edit that was claimed to be used by the app in their advertisements.
What did Lauren think about the app's marketing strategy?
-Lauren believed the app's marketing strategy was manipulative, as it tricked her and others into thinking they had her edit on their app, which led to increased promotion for the app.
How did Lauren feel about the app's use of ads?
-Lauren was annoyed by the constant ads, especially the one offering a 'free gift' which turned out to be an ad for PayPal, a service she was already aware of.
What was Lauren's conclusion about the app?
-Lauren concluded that while the app provided a standard template for fast editing, it was sketchy due to the variety of styles in its templates, which suggested potential theft from numerous creators.
Did Lauren find any positive aspects in the app?
-Lauren acknowledged that the app had potential and some of its templates were creatively designed, even though she was critical of its approach to crediting original creators.
What was Lauren's final action regarding the app?
-Lauren did not take any legal action but expressed her disappointment and made her viewers aware of the situation. She also encouraged viewers to comment if they had similar experiences.
Outlines
😀 Introduction and Issue with Veto's App
Lauren introduces herself and immediately addresses the issue at hand: a recent trend she started on Instagram is being used by an app called Veto's Photo Music Video Editor without her permission. She has received numerous messages from followers alerting her to this. The app seems to be profiting from her work, which has been incorporated into their template without her consent or knowledge. She expresses her surprise at how hard it was to find the app and shares her initial impressions after downloading it, including the app's interface and user experience.
😕 Exploring Veto's App and Editing Capabilities
Lauren delves into the app's editing features, noting the stark differences in style among the available templates, which suggests that the app might be sourcing from various creators without giving credit. She experiments with the app's editing tools, such as blending modes and filters, and discusses the possibility of enhancing the edits with additional software like Adobe After Effects. Throughout her exploration, she expresses skepticism about the originality of the app's templates and continues to search for her specific 'Her the Sun' edit, which she was led to believe was included in the app.
🤔 Conclusion on Veto's App and Its Marketing Tactics
Lauren concludes her review by expressing her disappointment with the app, not only for the potential theft of her editing work but also for the lack of originality in the templates. She suggests that the app's marketing tactics are deceptive, as they led her and others to believe that her specific edit was available within the app, prompting them to download it. She feels used by the app for promotional purposes without her consent. Lauren thanks her viewers for watching and invites them to suggest other editing apps for her to review in the future.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Editing
💡Trend
💡Template
💡Project File
💡App
💡Transitions
💡After Effects
💡Motion Blur
💡Watermark
💡Indie
💡Marketing
Highlights
Lauren, an Instagram editor, claims her editing work has been used by an app called 'Vidos - Photo Music Video Editor' without her permission.
The app is allegedly using Lauren's project file as a template for others to use, potentially profiting from her work.
Lauren has received numerous messages from followers alerting her to the use of her work in the app.
Despite the app's high rating, Lauren finds it difficult to locate it on the App Store.
Upon opening the app, Lauren is greeted with an unrelated ad for PayPal.
The app's interface is explored, with Lauren noting the lack of cohesion in the available editing styles.
Lauren tests the app by creating a quick video edit with photos of Sabrina Carpenter.
She plans to enhance the video with motion blur and additional effects using Adobe After Effects.
Lauren's enhanced edit is compared to a professional After Effects edit to gauge its quality.
The search for Lauren's specific project file within the app's templates comes up empty.
Lauren expresses skepticism about the originality of the app's templates, suspecting they may be stolen from various creators.
She tries out different templates within the app, noting their quick editing capabilities but also their lack of professional polish.
Lauren edits a video using one of the app's templates and attempts to make adjustments to improve its quality.
Despite the app's marketing tactics, Lauren remains critical of its ethical practices regarding the use of creators' work.
Lauren concludes that while the app offers standard fast editing templates, its practices are questionable, and it may be using work from numerous creators without credit.
She feels used by the app for promotional purposes, as she and others were led to believe her edit was featured in the app.
Lauren invites viewers to comment with other editing apps they'd like her to review.