BREAKING NEWS: Vivek Ramaswamy, Top Trump Allies Lambast Hush Money Trial As Michael Cohen Testifies

Forbes Breaking News

14 May 202412:25

Summary

TLDRIn the provided transcript, Governor Doug Bergham and Congressman Vake, along with other political figures, express their strong disapproval of a trial they perceive as politically motivated and unjust. They argue that the trial is an attempt to interfere with President Trump's campaign activities by tying him up in legal proceedings. They accuse the judge of being a political donor to Biden, the prosecutors of being Biden supporters, and the judge's relatives of financially benefiting from the trial. They also criticize the star witness as a serial perjurer. The speakers claim that the American people have already acquitted Trump, citing polls that show him leading in the election. They further assert that the issues that matter to the public, such as inflation, crime, and the economy, are not being addressed by the Democrats, who are instead focusing on pursuing their political rival. The politicians call for the trial to be concluded swiftly to allow Trump to return to campaigning and discuss the issues that matter to the American people.

Takeaways

📜 The speaker, Governor Doug Bergham, accuses the trial of being a politically motivated sham, suggesting that the judge and prosecutors are supporters of Biden and that the judge's relatives are financially benefiting from the trial.
💼 The star witness is described as a serial perjurer, casting doubt on the credibility of the testimony and the integrity of the trial process.
🔍 The accusation is made that the trial is an act of election interference, designed to prevent the president from campaigning and to distract from issues such as inflation, crime, and the economy.
📊 Polls, even from sources like the New York Times and Rasmuson, are cited to show that President Trump is leading in the polls, implying that the public has already 'acquitted' him.
🚫 The congressman argues that there is no crime in the legal expenses paid by the Trump campaign or organization, calling the proceedings a farce and a misuse of the justice system.
🏛 The judge is criticized for not recusing himself from the case due to perceived conflicts of interest, including his daughter's fundraising activities for Democrats related to the trial.
🤝 The speakers express support for President Trump and condemn the trial as a weaponization of the Department of Justice against the president and the American people.
📉 The trial is seen as a distraction from more pressing issues facing the nation, with the suggestion that the Democrats are not addressing real concerns like crime and the economy.
💰 The financial benefits reaped by the judge's family and the use of the trial for fundraising are highlighted as particularly egregious examples of the trial's alleged political motivations.
📉 The legal theory of the case is questioned, with the argument that it would be problematic if campaign funds were used for personal expenses, yet the case hinges on the opposite scenario.
🗳️ The speakers call for the American people to vote in November to reject the perceived weaponization of justice and to support Donald Trump as the 47th president of the United States.

Q & A

What does Governor Doug Bergham describe the trial as?
-Governor Doug Bergham describes the trial as a 'scam trial,' citing the involvement of a judge who is a donor to Biden, prosecutors who are supporters of Biden, and relatives of the judge who are financially benefiting from the trial.
According to the congressman, what is the main issue with the trial?
-The congressman argues that the main issue is that the trial is a politically motivated prosecution of a political rival by the Democrat Party, which he views as a misuse of the justice system and a travesty of justice.
What does the congressman claim about the judge's daughter?
-The congressman claims that the judge's daughter is making money by fundraising for Democrats, using the trial as a fundraising ploy.
What is the congressman's view on the importance of the issues being ignored due to the trial?
-The congressman believes that the real issues facing the nation, such as inflation, crime, and the border, are not being addressed by the Democrats, and that their focus is instead on pursuing Donald Trump.
What does the congressman imply about the American people's stance on Donald Trump?
-The congressman implies that the American people have already acquitted Donald Trump, as indicated by polls showing Trump leading in various parts of the country.
What does Congressman Cory Mills suggest about the motivations behind the continuation of the trial?
-Congressman Cory Mills suggests that the trial is being continued as a means of fundraising for Adam Schiff, Biden, and other Democrat opponents, and that it represents election interference.
What does Congressman Mills claim about Michael Cohen's credibility?
-Congressman Mills claims that Michael Cohen has no credibility or integrity, and that his testimony is part of the weaponization against President Trump.
What does the congressman argue about the use of campaign funds?
-The congressman argues that if Donald Trump had used campaign funds for a personal expense, he would be prosecuted for that. However, the case against Trump depends on the premise that he should have used campaign funds for an allegedly personal payment, which he did not.
What does the congressman describe as the best proof that the trial is a sham?
-The congressman describes the contradictory nature of the case against Trump—the fact that he would be criticized for either using or not using campaign funds for the alleged payment—as the best proof that the trial is a sham.
What does the congressman say about the judge's impartiality?
-The congressman questions the judge's impartiality, pointing out that the judge's children are allegedly collecting money from Democratic operatives by fundraising off the trial.
What does the congressman call on the American people to do?
-The congressman calls on the American people to vote in November to reject the weaponization of justice and to ensure that Donald Trump becomes the 47th president of the United States.

Outlines

00:00

🏛️ Sham Trial: Political Interference and Election Tactics

Governor Doug Bergham and Congressman Vake criticize a trial they deem a sham, alleging it's a politically motivated attempt to interfere with President Trump's campaign. They accuse the judge of being a Biden donor, prosecutors of supporting Biden, and the judge's relatives of financial gain from the trial. They also label the star witness a serial perjurer. Bergham and Vake argue that the American people have already acquitted Trump, citing polls showing him leading on key issues. They call for the trial's conclusion to allow Trump to campaign on matters important to the public.

05:00

📚 Legal Expenses and the Search for a Crime

Congressman Vake and others discuss the nature of the trial, focusing on the lack of a clear crime committed by Donald Trump. They highlight Michael Cohen's testimony regarding legal expenses paid by the Trump campaign and organization, questioning where the criminality lies. They accuse the Democrats of prosecuting a political rival during an election and neglecting real national issues. Vake emphasizes the safety concerns in New York due to the trial and criticizes the district attorney for focusing on political rivalry rather than actual crime. He calls for the American people to voice their opinion on the matter in the upcoming election.

10:01

🤝 United Front Against Politicized Persecution

The speakers, including Governor Burkham, Congressman Mills, and Congressman Donalds, condemn the trial as a politically motivated persecution. They argue that the proceedings are depressing and liken the situation to a Kafka novel, with the prosecution's strategy criticized as an attempt to bore jurors into submission. The speakers challenge the audience to identify the specific crime committed by Trump, suggesting that the case is based on vague allegations and bookkeeping errors. They also accuse the judge's family of profiting from the trial and argue that the case sets a dangerous precedent where any politician could be targeted. The speakers express their support for Trump and call for a strong voter response in the election to reject the weaponization of justice.

📉 Inflation and the Impact on the American People

In the final paragraph, the speaker addresses the American public, particularly those struggling with the economic challenges of inflation under the Biden administration. They assure the public that while the trial is ongoing, many are campaigning for Trump to ensure his message is heard. The speaker emphasizes Trump's strength on various issues including the border, crime, China, and the economy, contrasting this with Biden's perceived weaknesses. They argue that the legal system's politicization is failing and that the focus should be on issues that matter to the citizens. The speaker concludes by reiterating the importance of the election in determining the future of the country's legal and political landscape.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Sham trial

A term used to describe a trial that is considered to be unjust or lacking in legitimacy. In the context of the video, it is used to express the speaker's belief that the trial is a politically motivated act rather than a genuine pursuit of justice. The speaker, Governor Doug Bergham, uses this term to criticize the proceedings, suggesting they are a 'scam trial' due to perceived conflicts of interest and political bias.

💡Election interference

This refers to any actions, whether by foreign states or domestic entities, that are intended to influence the outcome of an election. The speakers in the video assert that the trial is a form of election interference, as they believe it is designed to prevent the president from campaigning and to sway public opinion against him.

💡Star witness

A key or primary witness in a trial who is expected to provide significant evidence or testimony. The term is often used to denote a witness whose testimony is seen as crucial to the case. In the script, the 'star witness' is described as a 'serial perjurer,' casting doubt on the credibility of the witness and, by extension, the case itself.

💡Double digits

This phrase typically refers to a lead or margin that is measured in tens of percentage points. In the context of the video, it is used to describe the president's alleged lead in the polls over his rival, Joe Biden, on various issues such as the economy, crime, and border security.

💡Justice system

The system of laws, courts, and law enforcement that is responsible for the administration of justice in a country. The speakers in the video argue that the justice system is being misused and weaponized for political purposes, which they believe is a departure from the principle that justice should be blind and impartial.

💡Fundraising

The process of collecting voluntary contributions of money or other resources, usually for a specific purpose. In this video, fundraising is criticized as it is alleged that the judge's daughter is financially benefiting from the trial by using it as a means to collect money for the Democratic Party.

💡Weaponization

The act of using something (often abstract concepts or systems) as a tool or weapon for achieving a particular end, often with negative connotations. The video's speakers claim that the Department of Justice has been 'weaponized' against the president, suggesting that it is being used to attack him politically rather than serve its intended purpose.

💡Bookkeeping error

A mistake made in the process of recording financial transactions. The term is used in the video to downplay the severity of the alleged financial misconduct, suggesting that if any wrongdoing occurred, it was a simple accounting mistake rather than a deliberate act of fraud or corruption.

💡Gag order

A legal order prohibiting certain people from making public comments about a case or legal proceeding. The video mentions a gag order being imposed on the president, which the speakers argue is an unjust limitation on his freedom of speech and a part of the alleged political persecution.

💡Attorney-client privilege

A legal principle that protects the confidentiality of communications between a client and his or her attorney. It is mentioned in the video in the context of a claim that the 'star witness' is violating this privilege by disclosing confidential information, which the speakers argue is further evidence of the trial's lack of integrity.

💡Third Rate Banana Republic

A derogatory term used to describe a politically unstable and economically weak country. In the video, one of the speakers likens the situation in the United States to that of a 'Third Rate Banana Republic' to emphasize their view that the trial and the perceived injustices within it are beneath the standards expected of a developed, democratic nation.

Highlights

Governor Doug Bergham and Congressman Vake claim the trial is a 'sham trial' and a 'scam trial', accusing the judge and prosecutors of being politically biased.

They argue that the judge's relatives are financially benefiting from the trial, suggesting a conflict of interest.

The star witness is described as a 'serial perjurer', casting doubt on the credibility of the testimony.

The politicians suggest that the trial is an act of 'election interference', aiming to prevent President Trump from campaigning.

Polls are mentioned to show that President Trump is leading in the country, implying public support despite the trial.

Congressman Vake criticizes the lack of a clear crime in the case, calling the proceedings a 'joke' and a 'farce'.

The accusation that the judge's daughter is fundraising for Democrats using the trial is highlighted as a misuse of the justice system.

Congressman Mills claims the trial is a source of fundraising for political opponents of President Trump, calling it 'election interference'.

It is stated that even if campaign funds were used for personal expenses, it would be prosecuted, indicating a double standard.

The legal strategy of the prosecution is questioned, with the suggestion that it is designed to bore jurors into submission.

The politicians express their belief that the American people have already acquitted President Trump on the issues they care about.

They assert that the justice system should be blind to politics and that the current situation is a 'travesty of justice'.

The call for the American people to vote in November against the 'weaponization of justice' is emphasized.

A plea is made to the American people to focus on the real issues affecting them, rather than the trial.

The politicians close by reiterating the strength of President Trump on various issues, in contrast to perceived weaknesses of his opponents.

The overall message is one of political persecution and a call for the public to recognize and respond to the injustice they perceive in the trial.